Storage area search for storage type

Hi Gurus,
iam trying to create a TO for initiainl Inventory load ( movement typer - 999), I enter the source storage type / section / Bin and dest storage type / section / Bin. Iam facing the error ' No storage area search has been defined for this material and storage type '. Please advise
thanks
Karthik

Hello,
Please check whether you have maintained storage type indicator in WM view for a material.
Also check whether you have maintaied storage type search, bin creation for the storage type.
Hope this will clear
Regards,
Prashant

Similar Messages

Error during search for movement type (953)

Hi All,
When I'm trying to issue goods to an internal order, I get the below error
Error during search for movement type (953)
The explanation is as follows
The movement type of the warehouse system and certain parameters are assigned to each movement type of the inventory management system
In this case no movement type of the warehouse management system was assigned to the inventory management movement type used by the paramaters enclosed in parantheses in the eror message.
Is there some config missing in this case?? Please let me know how to overcome this error
Regards,
Ashwin

when you create new movement types in MM, then you certainly have to create WM movement types too, if you want use the new movement types to post at a warehouse managed storage location.
This customizing needs to be done in IMG > LE > WM > Activities > transfers > define movement types
and
IMG > LE > WM > interfaces > inventory management > define movement types

Create storage location automatically for movement type 261

Hi Experts,
Currently we're inprocess of implementing "create storage location automatically" for reservation, and I've done with the configuration for both reservation side (Define Default Values) and movement type side (GI/transfer posting - Create Storage Location Automatically).
For movement type 201, new storage location successfully extended/created using T-Code MB21 (Create Reservation). But we found an error message while conducting the same thing for movement type 261 (which only can be created using T-Code IW31 (Create material reservation form Work Order).
Did we missed any required configuration? Pls kindly advice on what we should do.
Thanks a lot. Really appreciate the prompt response.
Rgds,
MD

Here's the current situation,
We configured the plant/storage view (SPRO), most of materials already extended to desired plant and storage location. Commonly, we can extend or create any materials for certain plant and/or storage location by maitain material master data (using T-Code MM01).
Recently, we develop the additional configuration to activate "automatic create storage location" for reservation, aligning with the movement type for Goods Issue (201,221,261,301,etc).
Let's say we have material number 123456789 and currently assigned to plant YYYY, but not extended to storage location XXXX. By performing T-Code MB21 (create reservation) with movement type 201 inputted, the respective material (123456789) is automatically created for the XXXX storage location.
But the above condition is not effected while performing the same thing using T-Code IW31 (create material reservation via Work Order) with movement type 261 (GI for Order).
Any idea to perform create storage location automatically while creating reservation for movement type 261? is there any possible configuration or procedure to be added?
Thank you

Black Screen on startup with message saying searching for storage devices

1. Hp Pavillion Desktop a6720y
2. Windows Vista 64 bit
3. Searching for storage devices at startup
4. No changes made that I can think to software or hardware

Soundmaster, welcome to the forum.
It appears that you have a failed hard drive. You can run SMART diagnostics from the BIOS to see what it says.
Please click "Accept as Solution" if your problem is solved.
Signature:
HP TouchPad - 1.2 GHz; 1 GB memory; 32 GB storage; WebOS/CyanogenMod 11(Kit Kat)
HP 10 Plus; Android-Kit Kat; 1.0 GHz Allwinner A31 ARM Cortex A7 Quad Core Processor ; 2GB RAM Memory Long: 2 GB DDR3L SDRAM (1600MHz); 16GB disable eMMC 16GB v4.51
HP Omen; i7-4710QH; 8 GB memory; 256 GB San Disk SSD; Win 8.1
HP Photosmart 7520 AIO
++++++++++++++++++
**Click the Thumbs Up+ to say 'Thanks' and the 'Accept as Solution' if I have solved your problem.**
Intelligence is God given; Wisdom is the sum of our mistakes!
I am not an HP employee.

Destination plant, description, material are editable for movement type 313

Hello
We are using movement type 313 for the transfer posting between storage location. We use MIGO for the same.
Ideally for the movement type 313, the destination plant and material should not be visible. We enter the material, batch,plant and storage locaiton in "From" side and enter only the storage location in "To" side of the MIGO screen. But now suddently after the EHP4 upgrade, we could able to enter the plant and materil in the "To" side also.
I checked the Field selections in OMJJ for movement type 313 and found that plant and material fields are suppressed.
Do you have any clue on why suddenly i am facing this problem and what could be possible solution.
Thanks
Venkat.

Sounds like you're just dumping your spec here. What have you tried exactly to solve this yourself?
Thomas

Creating search state to search for multiple types

Hi,
I am creating a search field where an user can type any word and it will search for it in three different types of assets.
As of now, I am creating three diff search states and adding corresponding constraint to them.
Is this the right way to do OR is there any work around where I can create only one search state and add three diff constrains for these diff asset types.
Any guidance will be really appreciated.
Thanks,
Nelash Jindal

Have you explored the integrated lucene search functionality? Basically you can allow lucene to index the asset types you want to search in and create a search form that queries the index. The internal search in the contributor UI is using the same method.
Check the developers guide page: 857 Public Site Search, this could be used for your purpose as well... On the authoring environment all asset types are already enabled to be indexed.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Rodney

Searching for a type of App in a particular Category ?

A couple of years ago I complained about the ridiculousty pathetic search facility on the iTunes Store.
Now I need to search for a certain type of iPad Apps in a particular category, i.e. I want to filter the results.
I seem to remember Apple brought out a "Power Search" (?) that was supposed to improve the search facility on the store then, but I can't seem to find it now, and I'm not at all certain that it was much of an improvement then anyway !
Apart from just typing hit and miss words into the little search box, is there any expanded or advanced search facilty on the store that I have missed ?

Hi Bobsax,
Looking at other posts over the last couple of years there have been several about the pathetic Search facility, and it seems that the "Power Search" facility just disappeared along the way !!!!
Presumably it was there in one version of iTunes and not the next ?
I can't understand Apple's attitude towards this lack of a decent Search. It not as if they don't actively update iTunes.....there seem to be updates at least once a month !
Being able to filter your Search to a particular category would help.
It's as if Apple doesn't want you to find what you are looking for ?
If Apple thinks the existing "Search" is good enough for us to find anything in the iTunes Store, maybe they can make a video tutorial showing us dumb mortals it's hidden magic ?

Clues about query's - Search for date type at INBOX

Hello Everyone,
At IC Webclient, does anyone experiment to add a new search date type at INBOX, at "search for date" search parameter?
I added a new date type at Date Management, ZDATA_PR.
When I try to assemble the query parts, I use something like this:
CL CL_CRM_QUERYAUI_RUN_BTIL
METH READ_BUSINESS_TRANSACTIONS
CALL METHOD cl_crm_report_qupart=>get_qupart_by_token
    EXPORTING
      iv_token     = 'DAT'
      iv_date_type = 'ZDATA_PAR'
      iv_from      = ls_query_aui-from
      iv_to        = ls_query_aui-to
    IMPORTING
      ev_qupart    = ls_qupart_range-querypart.
APPEND ls_qupart_and   TO lt_query.
APPEND ls_qupart_range TO lt_query.
However, I'm rewarded with an error message telling me that I have problems with the query.
Does anyone can give me clues how to perform this action? I'm clueless and there's not almost no information about this...
Thanks and Kind Regards
Bruno Garcia

Just to solve a mistake at example code:
CALL METHOD cl_crm_report_qupart=>get_qupart_by_token
EXPORTING
iv_token = 'DAT'
iv_date_type = 'ZDATA_PR'
iv_from = ls_query_aui-from
iv_to = ls_query_aui-to
IMPORTING
ev_qupart = ls_qupart_range-querypart.
APPEND ls_qupart_and TO lt_query.
APPEND ls_qupart_range TO lt_query.
does anyone has a suggestion or a clue to give?
Thanks
Bruno

Search for file types in multiple folders

Hello,
I would like to copy all jpg images from around twenty folders into one folder. In Windows you simply go to the root folder and search for *.jpg, and it will list all jpg files in these twenty folders.
How can I achieve the same effect in OSX? The finder doesn't seem to understand that command...

Activate the Finder and press COMMAND-F. You will see the button labeled "Kind" then "Any." Select "Image" from the second button. A third button appears labeled "All." Select JPEG from the third button. This will list all such images for the selected directory in the toolbar above. To find on the entire drive select This Mac. To save the search click on the Save button to the right.
You can use the + button on the right to add additional search criteria. Obviously you can create some very complex searches with a little time and practice.

Searching for Movie Types in iTunes

I would like to search for surfing movies in ITunes but it isn't possible to search for a movie by subject in iTunes the way that I can with tv shows. Am I missing something or should I continue to get my surf movies from Netflix?

You can browse movies by category (though there's not a category for "surf") but there's no way to search for them, only by Title, Actor, Director, Producer, or Year.

There are tables for condition type ZCB0 but they cannot be maintained

Hi,
I'm encountering a problem with Conditions in SAP CRM 7.0 - TPM scenario.
Here you can find the error:
"A condition type was selected that cannot be maintained in this system or for which there are no maintanable tables in this system."
Procedure:
"If maintenance for condition records of a specific condition type/ table is required in this system, this must be set up in Customizing Notes for data transfer from the R/3 System"
Can anybdy better clarify what do I have to do?
Thanks in advance,
Andrea

Hi,
I proceeded with the download of the following objects
u2022 DNL_CUST_CND_BO
u2022 DNL_CUST_CNDALL
u2022 DNL_CUST_CND_CD
u2022 DNL_CUST_CND_FG
u2022 DNL_CUST_CND_PR
u2022 DNL_CUST_FGD
u2022 DNL_CUST_PRC
u2022 DNL_CUST_CAD
u2022 DNL_CUST_BON
and I've run the report /SAPCND/RV12N001 for the generation of condition tecnique (Application: CRM; Usage: CD,PR,BO; Table number : *) but the condition tables are not assignable to the Condition Generation Types and I'm not able to create Trade Promotions with Trade Spends.
What should I do in order to solve the problem?
Thanks in advance and Best Regards,
Andrea Ricci

Storage Type Search for Multiple Storage Types

Hello experts.
I have an issue that I cannot seem to resolve.
Background
- We are using kanban strategy 0006 in order to move materials from Plant A to Plant B. Plant A is warehouse-managed but Plant B is not.
- Within Plant A we have one wm-managed Storage Location with many Storage Types.
- Within Plant B we have two Storage Locations ( each one representing a separate, physical building ).
- A majority of the kanban materials in use only have one Supply Area assigned to them. However we have approximately 15 materials that have multiple Supply Areas assigned to them. This is because these materials are common parts across two different Storage Locations in Plant B. As a result, they also have two different Storage Types assigned to them in Plant A ( the source of the material ).
Problem
Because we have common materials in two different Storage Types, the Storage Type Search (defined in OMLY) does not always return the correct Storage Type for the Stock Removal Strategy.
I understand that this occurs because the Storage Type Search is defined based upon the Warehouse Number, Removal/Putaway Indicator and the Storage Strategy. Therefore both Storage Types will use the same Storage Type Search when determining the Destination Storage Type for the transfer order.
FYI, here's an example :
- Material 123ABC is defined in Plant A, Storage Location SL00, Warehouse WH1 with Storage Types ST1 and ST2.
- Material 123ABC is defined in Plant B, Storage Locations SL01 and SL02.
- Material 123ABC has Supply Area SA1 for Storage Location SL01 and Supply Area SA2 for Storage Location SL02 defined for kanban.
- Material 123ABC has Stock Removal Strategy 003 assigned in the WM1 view for Plant A, Storage Location SL00 and Warehouse WH1.
- The Storage Type Search sequence defined for Stock Removal Strategy 003 is Storage Location SL01 then Storage Location SL02.
- When I execute kanban for Material 123ABC for Supply Area SA2, the Destination Storage Type for the transfer order should be ST2. However because the Storage Type Search is based upon the Warehouse (and not the Storage Type level), the Destination Storage Type for the transfer order is ST1 because it is the first item in the Storage Type Search sequence.
So my question : does anybody know how I can resolve this issue? We don't want to adjust our master data for these materials or supply areas. Is there a USER_EXIT that we can implement that will account for this condition?

Hi Mathew,
Based on the storage location indicator you can maintan different storage types for picking and putaway. I think your scnario willl be addressed using this indicator.Please explore this option before going for User exits.

ID Point for Storage Type V.S. Value in Storage Type Search Table.

I am trying to perform a GR without PO (MVT 501) for material ABC into Plant 1000, Warehouse number 100, Storage Location 0100.
During creation of Transport Order, the Destinated Storage Type appeared
is 011 (ID point for st.ty.010). However, the desired Destinated Storage Type should be 015 (High Rack) instead of 011.
I have checked the following configuration:
1. At the SPRO->LE->WM->Master Data->Define Storage Type, the value set for Field: Assigned ID (Identification point) for storage type under the Stock Placement Control = 011 (ID point for st.ty.010).
2. At the Storage Type Search Strategy, 015 is put as the first Storage Type, followed by Storage Type 001 (high Rack Storage)
3. And I found out that using LX03 (Bin Status Report) that there is no
Storage Bin created for the combination of the following
Plant 1000, WN 100, SLOC 0100, Storage Type 015, Storage Section 001
Since we do not have any Storage Bin created for Storage Type 015, it will display 011 as the destinated storage type during TO creation.
My question
After I have manually created a Storage Bin 03-01-01 for storage type 015, during the TO Creation, system still suggests 011 as Destinated Storage Type instead of the 015 I put in the 1st column of the Storate Type Search.
I already have the Storage Bin created for Storage Type 015, why the system still fails to pick it but suggests 011 from Assigned ID (Identification point) for storage type.

Dear Karthik
You are right, I did activated Indicator: Activate Storage Unit Type Check for Stock Placement in SPRO->LE->WM->Master Data->Define Storage Type
The Indicator: Storage type with storage unit management was also ticked automatically by system when I selected Indicator: Activate Storaget Unit Type Check for Stock Placement.
Are you trying to say the ID Port defined in Storage Type will have higher priority over the Storage Type value I maintained in the Storage Type Search Table?
I have already maintained the Storage Bin and I still do not understand why system still go for ID port. As far as I know, system will suggest the Storage Type from ID Port ONLY if storage bin in this storage type as their destination are not maintained in first in the other setting.
Quoted from SAP HELP
Identification point for storage type
Identification point (storage type) of the current storage type.
All goods movements that do not have a specific storage bin in this storage type as their destination are first directed to the identification point.
Here the goods are identified and a transfer order is generated for the actual transfer of the goods into the storage type concerned.
Please help.
Edited by: Daimos on Nov 4, 2011 3:25 AM

High Level Bin Search, before Storage Type Search

Hi,
Can anyone help me to guide, which user Exit/Badi, be used for searching Empty bins, before storage type search. I come to know from one of colleague below message.
"" if you want to check the quantities on a higher level (before storage type search ), you can use the user exit "+++".""
I am unable to understand which kind of user exit "+++".
Background: Want to do putaway with storage type 007: Our high rack is having space (Bins) with different capacity. One rack can have 4 type of racks.
We want to putaway material with different bin types in one storage type.
Regards,
Mainsh Gupta

Hi Vijay,
Thanks for your quick reply. I am trying user exit given by you. Once again I would like to submit my requirements here.
a) We have 98 racks in Warehouse.
b) Product is Ball Bearing.
c) Bearings are handeled in Ea, Issue and Stock unit is Ea
d) Alternate Unit of Measure is Box, i.e. per box quantity is mentioned into Material Master.
e) Each Rack is having 5 different type of bins.
f) We want to fill rack from bottom to top for first rack, and then next rack.
g) Once we do putaway for any material, each time system should pick Next empty bin, and each bin type is different.
Case 1) If going with Storage Type 007:
                i) Need to maintain palletization data in Material master WM view 2.
               ii) Can not maintain any capacity check for Capacity utilization in Material Master. Capacity is only Pallatization data.
              iii) While creating TO, System goes for placemet of material from bottom to Top in Rack, but give similar quantity for each bin, & these quantities are defined from Material Master from Palletization data.
              iv) In this case it is not checking bin capacity.
My query:
i) How can we split quantity during TO Creation based on Next Empty Bin avaialbe with certain capacity and all further bins with other capacity.
ii) Can we have different type of bins in one storage type if we are going for Storage type 007. or it is mandatory to have similar kind of bins.
Case 2) If going for Storage type 002:
              i) Not maintined Palletiztaion data in Material master.
             ii) Maintining capacity check in WM View 1.
            iii) Maintained Capacity check in Bin master.
            iv) WHile careting TO , system doesnot spilt quantity for next empty bins avaialbe, Only one line item comes for whole quantities. and system throw an error.
Message Number: Message no. L3068
Message Details: Maximum quantity for storage bin TR-15 will be exceeded by 740.000 PC
My query: How can we split TO quantity as per next empty bins available.
If you will give me your contact number, I can speak to you over phone and eleborate in more details for your clear understanding my issue.
Regards,
Manish

Storage Location field mandatory for Movement Type 103

Hi , We are using movement type 103 and 105 to receive material.
Here we want to make storage location mandatory for movement type 103.
How can we do that.
Regards
SHREY

Thx for all yr replies ....
I do agree with yr statements ....
103 doesn't update inventory at storage location level therefore it doesn't make sense to have storage location at the time of 103.
But at our end , we are using 103 for MIGO data entry by store user and 105 for MIGO approval .Store users are the right person who are enter correct storage location to which material should go.Therefore looking for a way thru which store user can enter storage lcoation at the time of 103 only.
Since approvers or purchaser are not very sure about the correct storage lcoation to which material should move therefore storage location at PO level or 105 level will not help me.
Any work around ??
Regards
Shreyh

Storage area search for storage type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for