Storage location based on valuation type

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario where the same HALB material in the plant can be of 3 different grades.
Accordingly, if split valuation is done based on the 3 grades, and 3 different storage locations are allocated for the 3 valuation types, how can the storage locations be configured so that material of one type procured or produced will not be allowed to be stored in any other location other than the one allotted for this type?
Regards
Sm.

Hi Bijay,
Since 3 locations are maintained, it is already decided that when a particular valuation type (or grade) is received with 101 movement , only a particular storage location will be chosen as the destination storage location for that batch. The issue here is that the user may mistakenly post it at a different storage location. My question is that how the necessary settings may be done so that the system does not allow that particular material to be posted to a different storage location ?
Regards
Sm.

Similar Messages

Storage Location for NON valuated material in MIGO

Hi friends ,
I have created a purchase order for NON-Valuated material (UNBW) with Account Assignment "K".I did check the material type UNBW configuration where only Value Update is checked for my Plant.
Now at the time of MIGO , system is asking for Storage lcoation (mandatory) and after MIGO system also updates quantity in Storage Location entered in MIGO.
while in normal cases (like ROH material type) , if we create Account Assigned PO ( like K) , system neither ask for Storage lcoation at the time of MIGO , nor system updates Qty at any storage location.
As per my understanding , if we create Purchase Order with account assignment K , system updates value in consumption and doesn't update Qty in stock (although material is stockable) .....which is simply like immediately issue of material to cost center.
Therefore wondering why system is updating Qty for NON-VALUATED material.
Does non valuated material means , POST value to Cost center (for account assignment K) and Update Qty in stock ?
Like in case of Account Assignment , value gets charged to WBS and qty gets updated as special stock "project"
All replies are welcome .....
Regards
Shrey

By definition UNBW's are ony qty updating and have no value assoicated with them. Since the system needs to stock this qty somewhere it by deafult asks for a Sloc.

Default SC Plant Company code and Storage location Based on Position

Hi All,
We are on version SRM 7.02.
We are using SAP ECC R/3 EHP7 based system as a back end FI and HR system.
Org structure in SRM is replicated fromm HR system.
We have case of concurrent employment in the HR org structure , which means one USER can be assigned to multiple Positions in an org structure.
We have a user A , who is created in Two different org units say O1 , O2 occupying positions P1 and P2, belonging to company code C1 and C2.
Whenever a SC is created a custom enhancement shows all the user positions to him and he has to choose one from the list of positions.
Now based on the selected position(P1) , i have to default plant(PL1), storage location(SL1) and Company code(C1).
Even after defaulting attributes based on the position, user gets an error "company code C1 is not valid for user"
This error (Message class : /SAPSRM/CLL ; # 135) is thrown from method : /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_DODM_SC_I_BD /SAPSRM/IF_CLL_MAPPER~UPDATE
after getting user's Company code using following method.
/sapsrm/cl_pdo_shared_user=>/sapsrm/if_pdo_shared_user~get_company_code
This gets Company code as C2 ; Based on Users Attributes and not based on User Position attributes.
If i overwrite values fetched by this method in Implicit enhancement, then plant(PL1), storage location(SL1) are not getting fetched.
Does anyone have any solution for this problem?
Regards,
Ashish Shah

Hi MURUGESAN !
      Can you give me some information more in Special Procument Configure in plant 2000 like:
          - Procurement type (maybe F)
          - Special procurement (Maybe U)
          - Plant (Maybe 1000).
          - Issuing plant (maybe 2000)
       We will check together.
       Regards,
      Tony

Serial numbers are not copied to new storage location for 311 mvt type

Hi Guys
I have 10 stock of material A in 001 Storage location ,which all the quantity is serial number managed
I have transfered 10 quantity of Material A to 002 location from 001 location using 311 MIGO
But serial numbers are not copied to 002 location after transfer posting
001 and 002 are both are WM linked and belongs to same plant
Can any body suggest good solution,how it can be done

Hi
1.Check in material master whether serial number management is active in Plant data/stor Tab and serial number profile is assigned
2. Check while doing MIGO once if u enter the material and transfer qty you are getting the serial number tab or not
3. If everything is ok, then after posting the document check the serial number status in IQ09, check the stock type and the storgae location in the serdata tab
Regards
Amuthan M

Multiple receivng storage locations on Reservation (movement type 311)

Hi
We have a requirement where we create a reservation document either using BAPI or BDC (MB21). At the time of creation we require to maintain different receiving storage location on the reservation. Currently SAP allows to maintain receiving storage location on the header field RKPF - UMLGO only and then copies the same value on all line item field (RESB-UMLGO)..The line item field is not editable or set as I/O field therefore working on finding a user exit or BADI to update fields RESB - UMLGO in background. Has any one had this requirement and in case yes can you please advise how was this addressed.
Thanks
Lokesh

Hi,
If my understanding is correct. You want to transfer post a stock of material from one storage location to another ( IM perspective ) and from one bin to another bin belonging to different storage types but same plant ( WM perspective ).
As this transfer posting does not involve any Sales order what is the logic behind the selection of movement type 311 E.
I hope you can very well make use of 311 movement type for the transfer posting in IM which will lead to the generation of a PCN in the WM side. On confirming the same you will be able to do the reflection of Transfer posting in WM side also.
I would suggest you to follow the above steps.
1) First check the transfer posting 311 E which you have already completed a PCN in the background. If it is availble, just try to confirm the posting Change notice which will clear off the negative entry and a correponding postitive entry in the receiving storage type.
2) In case if the system have not generated the PCN, then better to cancel the material docuemnt and re do the transfer posting to carry out the process from the start with the movement type 311 which will yield a PCN which can be confirmed to see the stock in the required storage type and in the respective bin accoring to the strategy set.
Regards,

Create storage location automatically for movement type 261

Hi Experts,
Currently we're inprocess of implementing "create storage location automatically" for reservation, and I've done with the configuration for both reservation side (Define Default Values) and movement type side (GI/transfer posting - Create Storage Location Automatically).
For movement type 201, new storage location successfully extended/created using T-Code MB21 (Create Reservation). But we found an error message while conducting the same thing for movement type 261 (which only can be created using T-Code IW31 (Create material reservation form Work Order).
Did we missed any required configuration? Pls kindly advice on what we should do.
Thanks a lot. Really appreciate the prompt response.
Rgds,
MD

Here's the current situation,
We configured the plant/storage view (SPRO), most of materials already extended to desired plant and storage location. Commonly, we can extend or create any materials for certain plant and/or storage location by maitain material master data (using T-Code MM01).
Recently, we develop the additional configuration to activate "automatic create storage location" for reservation, aligning with the movement type for Goods Issue (201,221,261,301,etc).
Let's say we have material number 123456789 and currently assigned to plant YYYY, but not extended to storage location XXXX. By performing T-Code MB21 (create reservation) with movement type 201 inputted, the respective material (123456789) is automatically created for the XXXX storage location.
But the above condition is not effected while performing the same thing using T-Code IW31 (create material reservation via Work Order) with movement type 261 (GI for Order).
Any idea to perform create storage location automatically while creating reservation for movement type 261? is there any possible configuration or procedure to be added?
Thank you

Issue material to particular storage location with particular mvt type

Hi
I have a question about production order confirmation
If i enter the storage location in goods movement page automatically come for movement type
ex.
I want to issue the material to scrap location.if i enter material and storage location SCR movement type should come 531.
Is it possible ?
Pl guide me

531 movement type is used for receipt of By-products. So in your case if a particular item you want to receive in scrap location by the use of 531 then you have to define the item as by-product.
If you define the material as by-product then during production order confirmation at goods movement screen, the movement type will be automatically 531.
The main material (manufactured material) will be received using 101 and the by-product will be received by 531.
Please follow below steps to define the item as by-product:
- First change the BOM of the header material (the material which is manufactured) and enter the item with negative quantity.
- Run Re-read PP master data for the production order.
- Try confirmation.

Moving average price based on valuation type for material

Gurus help needed.
we want to maintain the moving average price of the material in the pricing, and this depends on the Valuation Type. We have 3 valuation types.
If valuation type is blank then one MAP(Moving average price) value will come and if nn one map will come and for nn one map will come.
We have copied VPRS conditon type to YVRP and changed conditon category as T( Moving cost).
But in pricing the YVRP price is not picking from valuation type which is blank.
Where can i make the settings to tell the system to pick the moving average price from the material master where the valution type is blank always based on the condition.
Do we need to creat a routine? If so is there any standard routine which we can use or make minor changes to it?
If it is a new routine please tell me how to start with VOFM?
Note : We need the value to come automatically from material master same as VPRS.

Hi
The first method is not to set the pricing condition VPRS as statistical.
Simply remove PR00 and it will work fine if you always use VPRS as your pricing base inside the pricing procedure.
VPRS will reads both prices based on the price control in the material master.
Price control S for standard price.
Price control T for moving average price.
It is this simple if you do not have any other "Prices" in the price procedure.
However, if you are using one pricing procedure where for some items you price using VPRS and some others using PR00, then you should use requirement routines to enable the correct price condition type at the right time.
The second method involves more work as you need to write a formula (VOFM) to get that information.
This is how it goes :-
1. Set VPRS to be the first step in the pricing procedure and to be subtotal B (as standard).
2. Set PR00 with alt. calc. type formula, which sets the value of PR00 to be equal to the subtotal B.
Step 1 VPRS statistical, subtotal B, reqt 4
Step 2 PR00 Altcty 600
With regards
baalakrushnan.da

ATP check in certain storage location based on item category

hi gurus,
i need to know whether any one can help me. i need to know how to set the availability check in certain storage location by each item category. such as :
mat A item category TAN, ATP check only include in SLOC 01,02,03
but mat A with item category TANN, ATP check only include SLoc 04.
case:
in MMBE:
mat A
plant 1000 pc
     sloc 01 - 400 pc
     sloc 02 - 200 pc
     sloc 03 - 300 pc
     sloc 04 - 100 pc
so when create SO:
1. mat A itCat TAN qty 1000pc
   (Sistem will say that the stock not enough, bcoz stock in Sloc 01,02,03 only 900pc)
2. mat A itCat TANN qty 200pc
(Sistem will say that the stock not enough, bcoz stock in Sloc 04 only 100pc)
actually i prefer to use the standard solution but i think that must be use user exit, if so, do u know which user exit i shuld used, if not maybe u have a standard solution,.
thank you so much..
regards,
cindy
Edited by: cindy himawan on Feb 22, 2008 6:17 AM

Hi
As per my knowledge there is standard solution available for your requirement.. you may need to do some customisation using Z tables..
Muthupandiyan

Stock transport order between storage locations and assignment category type E not in MRP

Hello Gurus,
I have a stock transport order between 2 storage location which belongs to the same plant. Besides the stock transport order is allocated to a sales order (account assigment category E). When I run the MD03, the system take into account the quantity of the stock transport order as a future entry and this is wrong. I need that the MRP has not into account the stock transport order as an entry.
As an important information, If I modify the stock transport order removing the account asignment category E (sales order), then the MRP doesn't take into account it, so this is correct.
Could anybody tell me how to get it?
Thanks in advanced.

Laura,
It is normal that MRP will consider an STO as a receipt element; this is basic planning. It is unclear to me why you think you do not want it to do so, but I will assume you have some logical reason.
Contrary to what some others may have suggested, changing the scope of check for availability checking has no effect on which elements are considered for MRP. MRP is a completely separate functionality from Availability Check.
For Location > Location STOs (within a plant), then, you normally have the receipt element of the STO in the destination storage location, and the requirements element of an equal amount in the source storage location. Net of these two elements is zero, unless you have already issued the STO at the source location.
Changing the Account assignment from "E" means that the STO will not be relevant for your Sales order (in other words, when you receive this STO into the destination storage location, it cannot be used for your sales order). In a general MTO scenario, it also means that the proceeds of this STO (the stock you received) cannot be used for ANY sales orders.
One way that some people make an STO 'not relevant' for MRP is to alter the destination storage location such that it is not relevant for MRP. You can change the MRP relevancy of the storage location in MM02 > MRP4 tab
Best Regards,
DB49

Storage location wise project stock valuation

Hi all,
I am tying to generate a report for storage locationwise project stock valuation. MBBS is giving the data valuation type as well as WBS element wise valuation.That is fine. I want to show the data storage location wise. So, I have taken MSPR table where I am getting data storage location wise. For this stock, i am picking up unit price from QBEW table. My user says there will be cases that the material comes in with different prices in a same financial period.Here I am facing issue when there are two prices for the same material with same Val.area and same WBS element .Pls tell me how can I pick up the correct price.

Hi,
If stock with different price under 1 plant and 1 WBS Element put into different storage location based on the material price then in table MSPR we can have LGORT (storage location) as indicator there. Otherwise, since valuation type is not implemented, there is no other way you can differentiate stock based on price as you mentioned before.

Re:Valuation control at Storage location

Dear Guru's,
I have below requirement :
I want to control the Valuation of a material in Storage location or at material level. i.e that particular Raw material will be non-valuated or all the materials in 1 particular storage location are non-valuated materials
I know that can be control at Plant/company code level ( Plant as valuated or not valuated )
Also is it possible to mantain same raw material code as Valuated in 1 plant & non-valuated in other company code/Plant ?
Kindly guide
Regards,
Ishwar

Hi Ishwar,
If you had mentinoed your business requirement then it would be easier for us to resolve your issue. However it wont be possible to have valuation control at Storage location.
but you can have some alternative solution.
1. Create New Material Type (say ZXX) which should have only Qty update Ticked ( Do not ticket Value update Checkbox).
2. Create Material Code of Newly Created Material Type (ZXX) . These newly created Part code will not be valuated.
Also is it possible to mantain same raw material code as Valuated in 1 plant & non-valuated in other company code/Plant ?
It is very much possible to have Same part code to be valuated in 1 plant and non-valuated in Other Plant, Provided your valuation occurs at Plant level and not the company code level.
Regards,
S Anand

Difference in VAluated and Storage location Stock

Hi SAP Gurus,
I'm facing following problem during viewing Stock on Posting Date (MB5B)
For a perticular material, perticular plant, particular period
When I view storage location /Batch Stock (storage location not specified): Lesser Stock is shown
When I view Valuated Stock stock shown is more.
What may be the problem
Regards

Dear Ranjan,
I am using T.code MC.9 and MC.1
when i am executing the MC.9 for all materials
some of the materials with ZERO stock i mean valuated stock is ZERO but its showing value of the Valuated stock. same case with MC.1 also which is storage location wise
for a ZERO qty in storage location its showing valuated stock,
i have raised an issue to SAP they are working on it , we have open our PRD system to check SAP people.
Regards
venu gopal

Storage Location for Movement type

Hi,
How do I set up Storage Location Can not Movement type '261' goods issue ?
Thanks

Thx for all yr replies ....
I do agree with yr statements ....
103 doesn't update inventory at storage location level therefore it doesn't make sense to have storage location at the time of 103.
But at our end , we are using 103 for MIGO data entry by store user and 105 for MIGO approval .Store users are the right person who are enter correct storage location to which material should go.Therefore looking for a way thru which store user can enter storage lcoation at the time of 103 only.
Since approvers or purchaser are not very sure about the correct storage lcoation to which material should move therefore storage location at PO level or 105 level will not help me.
Any work around ??
Regards
Shreyh

Automatic Storage Location determination based on Customer in SO Creation

Hi Guru,
We have the scenario where some customer goods need to be out from the bonded WH, and Some customer will always take the goods from General WH, can i know if there is a way to maintain the default storage location based on which customer?
Thank you very much,
Regards,
Chee Wee

Dear Chee Wee,
First, Storage location will not be defaulted in Sales order with std system settings. Still if you want to automate storage location , you have to use exist.
Include: MV45AFZB
Form Exit: USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAP
Based on Customer you can bypass sales process ( whether goods can procure externally or produce internally),
but not default the storage location based on Customer.
Regards,
Reazuddin MD

Storage location based on valuation type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for