Storage location control

Hi,
Based on our current requirement, the moment we create a sales order, an out bound delivery and TO should get create automatically, if stock is available. We are successfully acheiving this functionality. But system is creating out bound deliveries for the stock in GR interim area, and failing to create TO, since stock is not available in WH.
To avoid this, we are trying to use storage location control functionality. With this process we are facing below two problems.
We could not able set up configuration for multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type
number two the GR reversal process (with mvt 102) is not working. It is working when we do not confirm the TO which got created due GR posting with mvt 101. But when we confirm the TO and try to cancel material document in IM, WM process not completing.
Please advice.
With regards,
Prabhakar

>
prabhakar pisapati wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on our current requirement, the moment we create a sales order, an out bound delivery and TO should get create automatically, if stock is available. We are successfully acheiving this functionality. But system is creating out bound deliveries for the stock in GR interim area, and failing to create TO, since stock is not available in WH.

> To avoid this, we are trying to use storage location control functionality. With this process we are facing below two problems.
>
> We could not able set up configuration for multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type
> number two the GR reversal process (with mvt 102) is not working. It is working when we do not confirm the TO which got created due GR posting with mvt 101. But when we confirm the TO and try to cancel material document in IM, WM process not completing.
>
> Please advice.
>
> With regards,
>
> Prabhakar
Your cycle is: Sales order -> outbound delivery (automatic) -> picking of outbound delivery (automatic) -> Confirmation of TO (automatic).
It appears that in your system, the GR interim area is a separate storage location, and the warehouse is in a different storage location. So your technique of setting picking storage location is correct. 
The IM movement in standard is 601, and the WM movement is also 601 During picking, the system is trying to pick up stock from the storage type mentioned in the storage type search strategy. If stocks are present there, then a TO will get created and confirmed.
It is not clear why you require multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type. I am afraid I havent understood your current setup.
Problem 2: GR reversal not working
When a GR is done, a 101 IM movement calls a 101 WM movement, and the stock gets moved to a storage type based on the search strategy. When this is cancelled via 102, a 102 WM movement is triggered (in standard). In case this is not happening in your system then you will have to check the problem.
Try posting the 102 movement material document, and then create the TO against the mat doc using LT06. You will be able to see the problem (TR not created / immediate TO creation not configured / immediate confirmation not set).
Regards,
Aroop

Similar Messages

  • Storage Location Control and ATP

    Hello Experts,
    I have activated the storage location control for the putaway process and is working fine for MM and WM perspective. The following are happening without any problem:
    1. Doing a GR to the virtual Storage Location and this storage location is blank in TR.
    2. The stock from the virtual storage location is considered in MRP while planning.
    3. TO creation from TR and doing putaway in real storage bin and Transfer posting 311 at IM level.
    The requirement is: The stock from the virtual storage location should not be considered in the ATP while creating a sales order. At the moment, ATP is considering this stock as available and confirming to a date immediately but in reality it should not up until the putaway is complete. And I think this is the sole purpose of having Storage Location Control in place.
    I did my research in this fourm and looked at the Warehouse Management Guide and it says "This means that for the duration of the putaway process, the stock for putaway is either not visible at all or clearly visible as stock that can not be picked, depending on the configuration of the availability check."
    Can someone help me understand what to check or uncheck in ATP? Or should I post this question in the ERP-SD forum?
    Appreciate you help.
    Regards
    Narottam

    Hi,
    I believe your mistake is here:
    "800 K15 0800 8001 411 check box is checked "
    The combination should read
    800 902 0800 8001
    The storage type is the interim storage type, that is where the posting shall happen. And if you leave out the check box it happens automatically.
    But why movement type 411? This usually should be 311.
    Best regards
    Juergen

  • WM Storage Location control problem - no TR created in receiving warehouse

    Hi all,
    I have configured the system to perform a 311 mvt from sloc 4002 to sloc 0010. Both Slocs have different warehouse numbers assigned.
    The transfer is working fine, however in the receiving warehouse no TR is being generated even though I am using the standard *** 311 movement type which has create TR flag set.
    If I disable the config and perform the 311 in MIGO after confirming the TR in the sending warehouse, the stock is moved to the new warehouse and a TR is created.
    Has anyone experienced this before?
    Mark

    2nd entry in storage location control is ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311 
    1st case:The entry.e. ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311  seems to be wrong.
    Your warehouse storage location 0010 is managed with ZF4 and not ZF2.
    But in this case, the way you created entries concludes that you want to transfer the stock from one Sloc to other Sloc which have separate warehouses.
    i feel your approach to excute this scenario seems to be not a valid one. I don't understand why you are running this process as WM transaction followed by IM document. You said that you are creating the transfer order first.. must be with wm mvt 311 in LT01. Standard WM mvt 311 doesn't allows manual TO creation.Your both storage locations are assigned to different warehouses. You should post the movement in IM first, then follow the WM activities.
    2nd case:If you say that ZF2 is correct, then your storage location is wrong, it should be  4002 instead of 0010  and you are transferring stock from one storage type to other storage within same warehouse.
    If you want to do this scenarion as WM followed by IM, then please change the Wm mvt 311 in ZF2 to allow manual TO creation.
    In movement type properties, set the destination storage type as 501.
    Strorage location control should be ZF2 501 DE01 4002 311
    Please let me know your thoughts on this.
    Regards,
    Santosh

  • Reg Storage location control when pulled materials via fixed bin replenishm

    We are Using Storagelocation Control Functionality in WM
    We have below Storage locations
    RW01 - Raw Material Storing
    PD01 - Materials staged for Production Lines
    I have setup RW01 as Standard Storage location and PD01 as 'not copied to TR'
    When i try to do bin to bin tranfer raw material to production lines From Bin in RW01 to Bin in PD01, TO has RW01 as expected, i Run posting change background job and this functionality is working fine
    We would be using Fixed bin replenishment strategy to stage materials for productions from raw materials storage
    I run LP21 for PD01, it has created TR but has storage location PD01 instead of RW01.
    PD01 shouldnt have copied as i have set 'Not to be copied to TR' for PD01
    Fixed bin replenishment doesnt support storage location control? does we need to go for customization ?
    Please help

    Please help
    Bin to Bin is working fine as per storage location control functionality set-up
    We have issue with fixed bin replenishment combined with storage location control
    Please share your inputs, Thank you
    While debugging we relaixed SAP doesnt check storage location control config at all while doing fixed bin replenishment, only custom solution to force system to check storage location control config and assign storage location is TR?
    Edited by: Sasi nagireddy on Jul 18, 2011 8:34 AM

  • Storage location control, storage location ref.

    Hello all,
    I am new in WM,
    Can anyone please explain me the  *_Storage location control function_*  and *Storage location ref* with the exmple in detail.
    Go for this path if required:-
    Spro-- log execution-- warehouse mang- interfaces inventory mang-- Define storage location control..
    Please help me...
    Abhinay Waikar.

    Hi,
    I;'ve used it for the following:
    Standard inbound deliveries to be received in storage location 1000. After finishing the TO in WM, the material is transferred from SLOC 1000 to 1010. In the sales orders, 1010 is taken into account and 1000 is disregarded. I.e. stock in 1000 is not seen as available.
    In this case available stock is indeed available, also in WM.
    MdZ

  • Plant n storage location control

    Hi all,
    how can we control the plant and storage location control?
    If I creaet PO for one plant, I must not create PO to other plant.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You have created PO for ONE plant only, but one plant have multiple storage location and also created PO to multiple storage location in one purchase order based on authorization.
    Plant and storage location control through authorization of create,edit/change,display,print  of PO.
    Hope, it is useful for you.
    Regards,
    K.Rajendran

  • Storage Location Control at customer level

    Dear All,
    Need a Customer wise Storage location control.
    Eg.
    Customer Name: ABCD
    Storage Location: FG01
    Customer Name: WXYZ
    Storage Location: FG02
    Regards,
    Saravanan E

    Hi,
    I am not sure but Explore STOCK DETERMINATION topic,
    IMG >> MM >> Inventory management & Physicl inventory >> Define strstegies for stock determination
    where define stock determination group and Rule
    Assign it header and Item level
    On item level maintain storage location and for FG01 - put priority 1 and FG02 - Put priority 2
    Assign stock determination rule to Application - Delivery.
    check whether it works with batch.
    I also update you if working fine.
    Kapil

  • Put away to production lines directly, storage location control WM

    We are Using Storagelocation Control Functionality in WM
    We have below Storage locations
    RW01 - Raw Material Storing
    PD01 - Materials staged for Production Lines
    I have setup 001 as Standard Storage location and 002 as 'not copied to TR'
    Few materials are received directly to production lines instead of going to Raw material storage
    PO--> GR is posted for PD01
    Now TR got generated but doesnt have storage location in it, this is fine as per functionality
    When i try to convert to TO it is copying MP01 since it it standard storage location
    This is where we are getting 902 negative entries for MP01
    No TR creation but bin to bin transer only solution ????

    Any pointers ???

  • IW41 - Storage Location Control (User Exit)

    Hi,
    While I'm trying to use function Goods Movement in PM order confirmation, I only want to consume ingredients from one storage location.
    Is there any user exit for this control?
    Thank & Regards,
    Begum

    Hi Venkatesan,
    Thanks for your reply. We first try to use the user exit CMFU0002 - Set parameters for time confirmation and goods movements. However, the system doesn't see this user exit while we are trying to consume materials from a storage location.
    Best regards,
    Begü

  • Storage type to be assigned to particular storage location

    Hi,
    As per clients new business requirement, 2 storage locations of a plant are assigned to same warehouse.
    But as the storage types comes under warehouse they come under both the storage locations. Is there any configuration to assign specific storage types to a particular storage location.
    I tried in SPRO under interfaces>IM>Storage location control but it does not allow.
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Pratap

    Hi,
    I feel the solution given by E060123 in his first reply should work well.
    Did you first define the storage location refernce and then in the same config node under "Control of Assignment "Plant / Stor.Loc. - Whse Number" assigned the sloc reference to the respective storage location
    And then assigned the reference to the search table as mentioned previously.

  • Storage location determination at UD level

    Hi ASAP,
    Hope you must be doing great.
    I wanted to determine storage location of material automatically at UD level.
    It is working fine for movt. type 101/321 but for 103/105 system is not able to pick storage location of material automatically at UD level.
    Please let me know where what config. is require.
    Thanks & Regards
    Manoj Singh

    Hi
    Check if this can be handled in Wearhouse management --> Invent. managent --> Define storage location control
    Hope this works

  • Plant and Storage Location determination at Item level during Copy control

    Hello Freinds,
    We are experiencing issues within Sales Order creation when the line item is referencing a contract. The plant and storage location is being determined from the contract - this should not be done, we have an enhancement in place for sales order plant/storage location determination which is how these values should be determined.
    Kindly suggest, if it can be achieved through configuration setting at Copy control level, to avoid the Plant and Storage location determination from Contract in to Sales Order.
    Thanks,
    Anup Bansal

    Hello
    You can mention the additional logic of redetermining Plant and storage location whenever copied from contract.
    In a sale order, i think you are maintaining a enhancement in prog MV45AFZB & user exit userexit_source_determination.
    YOu can maintain the coding at same place.
    thank you
    Anirudh

  • Authorization Control for Transfer Posting's Storage Location

    Dear Gurus,
    Hi ! May I know is that SAP has any Authorization Object to control Transfer Posting (SAP R3 4.0B) ?
    Let say in MB1B I only allow certain user to do transfer posting with P230 storage location, how should I control it ? With Authorization Profile?
    I had tried remove all storage location P230 authorization M_MSEG_LGO from those user who are not allow to use, but sad to say that most of the user who allow to use transaction MB1B also able to do good receipt or transfer posting with storage location P230.
    I had check those user's profile, actually in their authorization, there could not get P230 in their M_MSEG_LGO authorization  object.
    Thank you!
    Warm regards

    Hi,
    I did not tried OLMB before, but I couldn't get  the option you ask me to click.
    Please refer to the screen, is it the Basis Administration is what you mention lately?
    [http://www.pikipimp.com/pp/pimped_photo/s/image/40/552/543/OLMB-compiled.JPG?ts=1232093107390]
    I had assign the storage location P230 to the authorize users, but the problem now was those unauthorized users also can use the storage location P230 to do Transfer Posting (MB1B) although I did not assign to them in PFCG.
    Thank you.
    Warm regards.

  • How to control print-out in GI Slip based on storage location

    Hi Experts,
    Presently my smartform - GI Slip is giving print out for each line item. But the requirement is: no. of print out will depend on no. of storage location, independent of line item. Since GI Slip is a collective slip hence its showing same details for each line item. The print out are first taken from MB1A and then MB90 is for reprocessing.
    How can I control the no. of printouts based on storage location
    Please help me in this issue...
    Thanks in Advance...
    Pinki.

    You have to modify your driver program,
    Ex: Loop at < internal table>
    AT NEW <storage location>
    <New-page>
    End at.
    End loop.
    The above syntax will help you to close the issue.
    Rgds,
    SR

  • Re:Valuation control at Storage location

    Dear Guru's,
    I have below requirement  :
    I want to control the Valuation of a material in Storage location or at material level. i.e that particular Raw material will be non-valuated or all the materials in 1 particular storage location are non-valuated materials
    I know that can be control at Plant/company code level ( Plant as valuated or not valuated )
    Also is it possible to mantain same raw material code as Valuated in 1 plant & non-valuated in other company code/Plant ?
    Kindly guide
    Regards,
    Ishwar

    Hi Ishwar,
    If you had mentinoed your business requirement then it would be easier for us to resolve your issue. However it wont be possible to have valuation control at Storage location.
    but you can have some alternative solution.
    1. Create New Material Type (say ZXX) which should have only Qty update Ticked ( Do not ticket Value update Checkbox).
    2. Create Material Code of Newly Created Material Type (ZXX) . These newly created Part code will not be valuated.
    Also is it possible to mantain same raw material code as Valuated in 1 plant & non-valuated in other company code/Plant ?
    It is very much possible to have Same part code to be valuated in 1 plant and non-valuated in Other Plant, Provided your valuation occurs at Plant level and not the company code level.
    Regards,
    S Anand

Maybe you are looking for

  • Family sharing Apple id

    I've been using one Apple id for iTunes purchase - shared by all - and one for icloud data syncing - photos, contacts, calendar etc. With family sharing is there a way now to use the main iTunes account, change the email address to the icloud one I n

  • Captures but won't export Anamorphic

    Hi.. I'm using FCP 4.5 in conjunction with a Sony Handycam. I'm shooting in the Cam's 16:9 aspect, and can successfully capture such clips, and edit them in FCP4.5, often in real time, even on a 1.42Ghz Mini! However, when I export the edited clip us

  • Highlights from the Second Life Destination Guide 7/17/2015

    Still trying to get into Hair Fair 2015? Fret not — your good friends over at the Second Life Destination Guide have got your back. Stop by the Relay for Life of Second Life event this weekend and support a great cause! Find out more about their fund

  • Why doesn't it start?

    If I close my iBook, the glowing light stays on. But then when I open the iBook, the whole thing goes dead. I then have to hold the button down for a few seconds twice to get it to restart. What is wrong? If this helps, recently the battery went dead

  • Last and First pages of the Interactive report

    Hello, I have successfully inserted this code <div style=""> <table> <tr> <td style=""> <img align="absmiddle" alt="<<" title="<<" src="#IMAGE_PREFIX#srmvall.gif" onclick="gReport.navigate.paginate('pgR_min_row=1max_rows='+$v('apexir_NUM_ROWS')+'rows