Storage Spaces on WS2012R2 Server Essentials drive space error
So, I finally bit the bullet and retired my V1 Home Server in favor of building out a Windows Server 2012R2 Server Essentials box as a replacement. All seemed to go well with the install and so I built out a Storage Space (16 TB) using an external 8-bay
enclosure with about 14 TB of drives in it. The Space built out fine and I then moved my Server Folders to it which also went well.
At that point, I attached my 4 TB external drive that had my movie backups on it and started copying them over. After about a day and a half it is done, or so I thought. It copied over about 3.2 TB of data and now when I try to copy basically anything onto
the Storage Space, I get the following error message:
There is not enough space on <folder name>
xx.x GB is needed to copy this item. Delete or move files so you have enough space.
<folder name> is whatever the target folder name is and xx.x is whatever size the file or files add up to.
This then just has an option to Try Again, Skip or Cancel. Problem is, the drive only has a few TB of data on it and still shows mostly empty, yet I can't copy hardly anything to it. It seems to allow me to copy smaller files individually, but any larger
group of files, or a folder with larger files in it yield the error above.
Anybody have any ideas?
Hi,
What is the resiliency type of the virtual disk in the Storage Spaces? How much the free space of the virtual disk? The issue may because the free space of the virtual disk is less than 4 TB.
You could refer to the articles below to know more about the virtual disk size of different resiliency types:
Storage Spaces - Designing for Performance
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/15200.storage-spaces-designing-for-performance.aspx
Using the Storage Pools page in Server Manager to create storage spaces
http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2012/12/06/using-the-storage-pools-page-in-server-manager-to-create-storage-spaces.aspx
Regards,
Mandy
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here .
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Similar Messages
-
"Not Enough Storage Space" error - Acrobat 9 Pro
Hey gang,
I get a "not enough storage space" error message when trying to install Acrobat 9 Pro. I've got administrative rights and I'm trying to install from my local drive. Any ideas? Thanks! I've attached a screen shot of the error message.
My system particulars:
Windows 7 Pro (64-bit)
Acrobat 9 Professional
8 GB RAM
132 GB free on hard drive
Thanks again,
-terry-I cleaned the Temp directory and rebooted, making sure to kill the processes in the Startup folder. It went smooth like a gravy sandwich. Thanks for the help!
-terry- -
Windows Server Essentials Storage Service and Windows Server Essentials Email Service eating memory
Hi
I have Windows Server 2012 R2 with Essentials Role installed. I have integrated server with Azure AD, Office 365 and Intune using the Essentials Dashboard integration tools.
I can see that Windows Server Essentials Storage Service and Windows Server Essentials Email Service are eating much of server memory. What are these services for and why they use a lot of memory? Specially I am wondering about the Email Service. What is
it for? Server dont handle email in any way so what is this service for? I tried to google it but found nothing.Hi
I have 6GB of memory.
When I check from Resource Monitor, for Essentials Storage Service, Commit Set is 4G and Working Set is 1,8G.
Email Service Commit is about 1,8G and Working Set is just below 1G.
So these two services are reserving almost all the memory.
Memory is about 85-90% in use all the time, whether it be night or day.
Server have about 12 users and at the office there is about 2-6 person at the time. Link between server and office is 100M. There are no other services installed but the basic ones. We use server for AD (O365 integration) and file shares. Traffic in File
Shares are not big. They are more kind of an warehouse that in busy day-to-day use.
This server is about couple of months old and it has been like this since it was fired up.
I dont know what to look for from Event Logs and Process Monitor dont give me anything useful. -
Storage Spaces -error Location not available.
I have had Storage spaces running for a couple of weeks. 4 drives 3tb each, same make/model. Have them pooled into a striped "raid 5" setup thru storage spaces. I travel and do some shift work. I frequently try to get access to them remotely
and informed that the drive pool is not accessible. So when I get home I attempt to access it locally with same issue.
I see my pool (G:) in my drive list, I click on it no problem, can see 1st directory, and can go into 1 folder. If I try to do anything in that folder, go to any other folders or attempt to use any files in the root, it sits and waits and looks
like it is searching. I hear no drives spinning up and after about 2 minutes I get a pop up that says location not accessible.
In order to access the information, I need to shut computer down and reboot. Not only is this a bother, but sometimes not available remotely.
Are the drives going to sleep and not waking up?
Any help on how to fix this would be greatly appreciated.
ChrisHello Chris,
Do you mean that you use a RAID5 drive to create a storage space, and it worked for weeks and now has the issue about ‘location not accessible’?
Please share us the whole error message and a screenshot is preferred.
Based on my test, I can normally create a storage space with 3 VHD. And it work with no accessible issue.
Please try to change ownership and permission of the drive and check if the issue still exists.
For more information about taking ownership, please take a look at the following article.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753659.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Best regards,
Fangzhou CHEN
Fangzhou CHEN
TechNet Community Support -
Not enough storage space error. wont let me back up
When my 4S attempts to automatically back up I get an error message saying there is not enough storage space. I'd like to see whats taking up the space on the cloud, but when I access the cloud, theres NOTHING that could be taking up that much space! (contacts, notes, calendar, reminders.) I cant even see my pictures on the cloud. Which are supposed to be backing up... so I'd like to know HOW to access the things I am backing up, and WHY it is saying there is not enough room when there is, and WHAT I can do about it. Please help!
Hello ttclarin,
I think it is trying to tell you that you have used your 5GB of iCloud storage. Check your device for iCloud usage and see how much space you are using there.
-Derrick Lambert -
Your Time Capsule disk is low on storage space - error
I am getting the error "Your Time Capsule disk is low on storage space." and it now flashes amber. I use the time capsule to set up a wireless network and I can no longer access the internet from my MapBook Pro in another room, only if I am next to the Time Capsule. Help!!! Why is my time capsule low on storage space? I thought it is suppose to delete the old backups to make room for the new backups.
MacDoz wrote:
I too am getting the same low disk space issue on my Time Capsule, and have not been able to find an answer anywhere given that I thought the Time Capsule was meant to automatically delete old back-ups.
Those are two different, independent, things.
Since you can use a Time Capsule for things besides backups, there's a built-in warning (the flashing light) when it gets near full (exactly how full is not clear).
Time Machine is separate; when it doesn't have space for a new backup, it will delete the oldest backup(s) as necessary, if it can, to make room for new ones.
The handling is a bit different, though, for Leopard vs. Snow Leopard.
In Leopard, if you have the +Warn when old backups are deleted+ box checked in Time Machine Preferences > Options, it will fail with a message. All you have to do is remove the check.
In Snow Leopard, it will delete old backups as necessary, do the backup, then send a message if you have the box, now worded +Warn after old backups are deleted,+ checked.
See #C4 in Time Machine - Troubleshooting for details. -
ICloud Storage Space Error? I have enough space though...
Hello,
My iCloud won't let me upload a spreadsheet that takes up only 10 megabytes. It comes up with an error saying not enough space, however when I checked the iCloud storage it says I still have 800mb of space left. Has anyone else encountered this problem? If so have you found a solution?
All help is appreciated.Contacting Apple for support and service
-
No roll storage space error in webi
Hi,
I am using SAP BW query in webi. while running the report i am getting the following error.
"Error in MDDATASetBW.GetCELLData. No roll storagespace of length 1293328 available for internal storage. table blocks..(WIS10901)"
I searched in sdn. but unable to find solution for this problem. can anyone provide solution for this..
Regards,
Shanthakumar.Hi,
Try with below steps. or check SAP Note 1369738 - Error in MDDataSetBW.GetCellData (WIS 10901) when refreshing WebI report using SAP BEx query.
Restrict query results to a smaller set of data.
Suppress the 'Not assigned/#' Hierarchy node (Exclude Selection) in the BEx hierarchy query. This reduces the size of I-Table & buffer requirements.
Avoid use of 'default values' for hierarchy & hierarchy node variables. Or, if a default must be assigned, set it to an attribute that has 0 levels.
Implement : Enhancement Pack 1 + Support Package 3 (or above) for optimized interoperability between BusinessObjects & SAP modules.
Thanks,
Amit -
Server 2012 R2 Essentials - Restore Storage Spaces - Sector size mismatch
I am attempting to restore my R2 Essentials server storage spaces drive using the server restore process. I have purchased new larger hard drives to replace the existing ones. When the restore begins, it immediately fails with the following error:
For search:
The restore process did not succeed because the sector size of the restore destination volume is different than the sector size of the backup source volume. This can happen if you change the hard drive, configure a new Storage Spaces, or remove the
old Storage Spaces. Make sure that you restore the backup to a volume that uses the same sector size as the backup source.
Actually, after toying around with it I just restored files instead of the full drive. Not optimal, but same as a robocopy that I would have ended up doing otherwise.Hi ,
From the error we can see that the sector between source storage and target storage doesn't match, we can run the now command line to display their sector:
C:\Windows\system32>fsutil fsinfo ntfsinfo H:
More information:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/5d9e2f23-ee70-4d41-8bfc-c9c4068ee4e2/backup-fails-with-error-code-2155348010?forum=windowsbackup
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj713539.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc976808.aspx
Hope this helpful.
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. -
Install Windows Server 2012 R2 VM on Storage Spaces with Storage Tiers
Hey guys
In my small/medium sized company we will soon update to Windows Server 2012 R2. I would like to implement virtual servers using Hyper-V. I didn't find a lot of information about Hyper-V in combination with storages spaces and autoamted storage tiers.
And this is very confusing to me as it seems to me that this would be the best practice as it is the most cost-efficient and most elegant solution.
My ideal scenario:
With Hyper-V I virtualize two Windows Server 2012 R2 instances. So two separate virtual machines.
I use the following disk setup:
1x cheap HDD 40GB for hyper-v server 2012 r2 core.
2x SSD 200GB (enterprise-grade)
2x HDD 4TB (7.2k, enterprise-grade)
Step 1:
I will install Hyper-V Server 2012 R2 Core on the 40GB HDD. Via command line, I will create a storage pool with automated tiered storage using the SSDs and the HDDs in mirrored mode the following way:
With Tiered Storage, I create a storage pool containing the SSDs and the HDDs. Then I create storage space A (1TB) and B (3.2TB) with the SSDs in a mirrored setup and the HDDs in a mirrored setup. The SSDs for the „hot files“ and the HDDs for the „cold files“.
Step2:
Ontop of the storage space A I want to install the first Windows Server 2012 R2 instance with Active directory. On storage space B I want to install the second Windows Server 2012 R2 instance for a business application to run on it.
Conclusion:
The SSDs are mirrored and therefore one SSD can fail.
The 4TB HDDs are mirrored and therefore one HDD can fail.
I have a fast and easy scalable environment.
But in the Internet I found many information that it’s not possible to install an operating system onto a storage tier.
Question 1:
Is this setup possible?
Question 2:
If this setup is possible, why is not everyone doing it?
Question 3:
Is it possible to do Step 1 over a GUI from a remote machine?
Question 4:
If the creation of Storage Tiers in the Hyper-V Server 2012 R2 is not possible. Would it work to use a Windows Server 2012 R2 as a parent system on the 40GB HDD? To do Step 1?
I would gladly get some feedback of people knowing Storage Tiers well.
Thanks a lot!I would absolutely prefer a GUI. But a Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard Licence allows you to run two VM machines.
It also grants you a physical installation ("POSE" in the licensing documents). You can buy one copy of WS2012R2 Standard, install it on the hardware, enable Hyper-V, and then operate two virtual machines with WS2012R2 Standard ("VOSE"
in the licensing documents). The only restriction is that the management operating system (POSE) can only run services and applications meant to manage the virtual machines and/or the management operating system. The Hyper-V Server license is the same way
so it's not really any different.
In short, given the benefits of the GUI at your stage of learning, you have no solid reason not to install the full system and take advantage of it. You can disable the GUI later once you get your footing. Or not. Whatever suits you. However, in response
to your Question 3, you can do this all remotely. Once you get WS2012R2 installed in a guest, you can use it to manage the management operating system if you want. There are many options.
But then I would also need to have redundancy on the 40GB HDD as if this HDD brakes, all others brake as well?
Yes, you're going to want some redundancy for the management operating system. But, you've listed 5 drives in your original layout. You don't really have a 5-bay system, do you? Is there an empty sixth bay? Could you not get two 40 GB drives instead of one
and use hardware RAID-1?
Eric Siron
Altaro Hyper-V Blog
I am an independent blog contributor, not an Altaro employee. I am solely responsible for the content of my posts. -
Storage spaces can only use whole drives
One of the features that I was really interested in with WS2012E is storage spaces as it replaces the old driver extender of WHS v1. Having now installed WS2012E onto my WHS2011 box I am bit staggered to find that it can only use whole drives. My box came
with 2 * 2Tb drives, the first partitioned as boot, then a 60G of OS followed by the rest allocated as storage. I have successfully created a Storage space pool of the second drive but cannot find any way to add the remaining storage from the large partition
on the other drive into the pool. As the UI just shows me drives rather than partitions, I am bit challenged. I thought that storage spaces was meant to be flexible about adding drives just like the old drive extender. Even add on technolgies like DriveBender
for WHS2011 allows for a storage space to be made up from this type of set up. So we seem to be going backwards.
Plus when creating the drive pool it defaulted on a 2Tb drive to a 2Gb size! How useful is that? As soon as I started copying data to the drive it ran out of space. I then had to go in and expand it.I note that you did this with Windows Server 2012 Essentials. I cannot seem to do this with Windows 2012 Standard. I have two 500 GB disks and 40GB of the first disk, PhysicalDisk0 is partitioned for the OS. Nothing I do makes PhysicalDisk0
show up in the Storage Pool area of Server Manager - all I can see is PhysicalDisk1. (Refer to 'Physical Disks' in the bottom right corner of the previous poster's first screen shot above. I can only see 'PhysicalDisk1', not 'PhysicalDisk0'.) If
I click 'Disks' just under 'Volumes' in the same screenshot above, I can see PhysicalDisk0, and it shows 466 GB capacity, 423 GB unallocated. PhysicalDisk1 shows 466 GB capacity, 466 GB unallocated. My intent was to mirror the remaining 423 GB
on PhysicalDisk0 with 423 GB on PhysicalDisk1. I would then allocate the leftover 43 GB on PhysicalDisk1 as a 'scratch' disk. I have tried leaving everything unallocated and have tried all variations of creating volumes and virtual disks, but nothing
I do makes a difference. I found other threads related to this issue which indicated there was a flaw in the 2012 GUI and that this process could be done via Powershell. However, there seems to be a mix of Windows 8 and Windows 2012 in these threads
and, apparently the Powershell commands I've found apply to 8 and not 2012, as I get invalid command errors when I try to use them.
Can anybody tell me how to mirror the unallocated portion of the primary disk PhysicalDisk0 (which has a partition for the OS) with a same-sized portion of PhysicalDisk1 with Windows Server 2012? Thanks! -
How to configure local disk on OVM Server as storage space to create VMs
Hello,
We have installed OVM Server 3.1.1 on a machine that has 250 GB of Hard disk space [Single disk].
While installing used an option - Remove all partitions and create a new default partition layout.
Around 4GB has been used and remaining 246 GB is left as free space.
From OVM Manager - the server is discovered but didn't discovered the physical disk [i.e. remaining 246 GB raw disk space].
Can someone help me to understand how to use local disk as storage space for creating and running VM's.
Thanks
SrinivasYou can? You've used every conceivable BIOS out there? You must really be full of yourself. There is absolutely no BIOS that I know of that gives this basic function. BIOSs do not "hard partition" anything. A "BIOS" is not made for such things. Do you even know what "BIOS" stands for?
I wonder why there is some many wanting to do this and are having problems.... I mean if it is such a straight forward thing to do..... It must be down right "intuitive".
You maybe speaking of a RAID "BIOS" but you obviously think you're not. Some motherboards have integrated RAID abilities. Intel RST comes to mind... BUT this isn't a feature of a MOTHERBOARD BIOS.
I've got some $50,000 servers that will not break a single hard drive up into multiple logical drives..... Now, I haven't worked on a "Stinkpad" for many years. Don't want to. However, I have never seen one that would do what you're saying you're doing.
You maybe trying to help.... but you're leading people down a wrong path.
Its just as easy to run virtual box and use the virtual box templates for Oracle VM. In fact, its more practical if you want to run Oracle VM on a laptop for testing purposes than blowing everything away and attempting to setup different LUNS on a single hard drive.
For your review...
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/servers-storage-admin/configure-vm-templates-1656261.html
Although it's more reliable to use a separate location (such as an NFS share) for a storage repository, you can use a local disk of your Oracle VM Server instead, thus taking advantage of the local storage option. Beware, though: Oracle VM Server 3.0 doesn't allow you to utilize the unused space on the physical disk it's installed on. For local storage, you'll need at least one more physical disk. In other words, you'll need a total of two disks at minimum on your Oracle VM Server host if you want to use local storage. In practice, though, local storage is not a primary use case. The major downside to this approach is that local storage, by definition, cannot be shared between different servers.
Edited by: user12273962 on Dec 10, 2012 10:40 AM -
Has anyone else seen Windows Server 2012 Storage Spaces with a Simple RAID 0 (also happens with Mirrored RAID 1 and Parity RAID 5) virtual disk exhibiting extremely slow read speed of 5Mb/sec, yet write performance is normal at 650Mb/sec in RAID 0?
Windows Server 2012 Standard
Intel i7 CPU and Motherboard
LSI 9207-8e 6Gb SAS JBOD Controller with latest firmware/BIOS and Windows driver.
(4) Hitachi 4TB 6Gb SATA Enterprise Hard Disk Drives HUS724040ALE640
(4) Hitachi 4TB 6Gb SATA Desktop Hard Disk Drives HDS724040ALE640
Hitachi drives are directly connected to LSI 9207-8e using a 2-meter SAS SFF-8088 to eSATA cable to six-inch eSATA/SATA adapter.
The Enterprise drives are on LSI's compatibility list. The Desktop drives are not, but regardless, both drive models are affected by the problem.
Interestingly, this entire configuration but with two SIIG eSATA 2-Port adapters instead of the LSI 9207-8e, works perfectly with both reads and writes at 670Mb/sec.
I thought SAS was going to be a sure bet for expanding beyond the capacity of port limited eSATA adapters, but after a week of frustration and spending over $5,000.00 on drives, controllers and cabling, it's time to ask for help!
Any similar experiences or solutions?Has anyone else seen Windows Server 2012 Storage Spaces with a Simple RAID 0 (also happens with Mirrored RAID 1 and Parity RAID 5) virtual disk exhibiting extremely slow read speed of 5Mb/sec, yet write performance is normal at 650Mb/sec in RAID 0?
Windows Server 2012 Standard
Intel i7 CPU and Motherboard
LSI 9207-8e 6Gb SAS JBOD Controller with latest firmware/BIOS and Windows driver.
(4) Hitachi 4TB 6Gb SATA Enterprise Hard Disk Drives HUS724040ALE640
(4) Hitachi 4TB 6Gb SATA Desktop Hard Disk Drives HDS724040ALE640
Hitachi drives are directly connected to LSI 9207-8e using a 2-meter SAS SFF-8088 to eSATA cable to six-inch eSATA/SATA adapter.
The Enterprise drives are on LSI's compatibility list. The Desktop drives are not, but regardless, both drive models are affected by the problem.
Interestingly, this entire configuration but with two SIIG eSATA 2-Port adapters instead of the LSI 9207-8e, works perfectly with both reads and writes at 670Mb/sec.
I thought SAS was going to be a sure bet for expanding beyond the capacity of port limited eSATA adapters, but after a week of frustration and spending over $5,000.00 on drives, controllers and cabling, it's time to ask for help!
Any similar experiences or solutions?
1) Yes, being slow either on reads or on writes is a quite common situation for storage spaces. See references (with some of the solutions I hope):
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverfiles/thread/a58f8fce-de45-4032-a3ef-f825ee39b96e/
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2012/10/10/windows-server-2012-storage-spaces-is-it-for-you-could-be.aspx
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserver8gen/thread/64aff15f-2e34-40c6-a873-2e0da5a355d2/
and this one is my favorite putting a lot of light on the issue:
http://helgeklein.com/blog/2012/03/windows-8-storage-spaces-bugs-and-design-flaws/
2) Issues with SATA-to-SAS hardware is also very common. See:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverClustering/thread/5d4f68b7-5fc4-4a3c-8232-a2a68bf3e6d2
StarWind iSCSI SAN & NAS -
Storage Space - Inaccessible, reconnect drives
Hi
My 2 HDD Mirror Storage Space is no longer accessible. I cannot see it in explorer, and under Storage Space Manager it says Inaccessible, Reconnect drives. Both disks under Physical Disks are displaying as OK, so I'm really scratching my head.
The results from
Get-PhysicalDisk | fl *
Get-StoragePool | fl *
Get-VirtualDisk | fl *
Any help here would be appreciated, really scratching my head. Even when I connect each of the single disks on their own they don't show up
Are as follows:
Usage : Auto-Select
OperationalStatus : OK
HealthStatus : Healthy
BusType : USB
CannotPoolReason : In a Pool
SupportedUsages : {Auto-Select, Manual-Select, Hot Spare, Retired...}
MediaType : UnSpecified
ObjectId : {1}\\OFFICE-PC\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Providers_v2\SPACES_PhysicalDisk.Objec
tId="{cef39ebe-7fba-11e3-8250-806e6f6e6963}:PD:{772e2d6a-f0f7-11e1-be68-806e6f6e6963
PassThroughClass :
PassThroughIds :
PassThroughNamespace :
PassThroughServer :
UniqueId : USBSTOR\Disk&Ven_Seagate&Prod_Portable&Rev_0130\2GHY5YD1____&0:office-pc
AllocatedSize : 956435529728
CanPool : False
Description :
DeviceId : 2
EnclosureNumber :
FirmwareVersion : 0130
FriendlyName : Seagate Portable USB Device
IsIndicationEnabled :
IsPartial : False
LogicalSectorSize : 512
Manufacturer : Seagate
Model : Portable
OtherCannotPoolReasonDescription :
PartNumber :
PhysicalLocation :
PhysicalSectorSize : 512
SerialNumber : 2GHY5YD1
Size : 999385202688
SlotNumber :
SoftwareVersion :
SpindleSpeed : 4294967295
PSComputerName :
CimClass : ROOT/Microsoft/Windows/Storage:MSFT_PhysicalDisk
CimInstanceProperties : {ObjectId, PassThroughClass, PassThroughIds, PassThroughNamespace...}
CimSystemProperties : Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure.CimSystemProperties
Usage : Auto-Select
OperationalStatus : OK
HealthStatus : Healthy
BusType : USB
CannotPoolReason : In a Pool
SupportedUsages : {Auto-Select, Manual-Select, Hot Spare, Retired...}
MediaType : UnSpecified
ObjectId : {1}\\OFFICE-PC\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Providers_v2\SPACES_PhysicalDisk.Objec
tId="{cef39ebe-7fba-11e3-8250-806e6f6e6963}:PD:{795ec931-3b3a-11e2-be6d-00247e572b92
PassThroughClass :
PassThroughIds :
PassThroughNamespace :
PassThroughServer :
UniqueId : USBSTOR\Disk&Ven_Seagate&Prod_Expansion&Rev_0215\NA41HDPW&0:office-pc
AllocatedSize : 956435529728
CanPool : False
Description :
DeviceId : 1
EnclosureNumber :
FirmwareVersion : 0215
FriendlyName : Seagate Expansion USB Device
IsIndicationEnabled :
IsPartial : False
LogicalSectorSize : 512
Manufacturer : Seagate
Model : Expansion
OtherCannotPoolReasonDescription :
PartNumber :
PhysicalLocation :
PhysicalSectorSize : 512
SerialNumber : NA41HDPW
Size : 999385202688
SlotNumber :
SoftwareVersion :
SpindleSpeed : 4294967295
PSComputerName :
CimClass : ROOT/Microsoft/Windows/Storage:MSFT_PhysicalDisk
CimInstanceProperties : {ObjectId, PassThroughClass, PassThroughIds, PassThroughNamespace...}
CimSystemProperties : Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure.CimSystemProperties
Usage : Auto-Select
OperationalStatus : OK
HealthStatus : Healthy
BusType : SATA
CannotPoolReason : Insufficient Capacity
SupportedUsages : {Auto-Select, Manual-Select, Hot Spare, Retired...}
MediaType : UnSpecified
ObjectId : {1}\\OFFICE-PC\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Providers_v2\SPACES_PhysicalDisk.Objec
tId="{cef39ebe-7fba-11e3-8250-806e6f6e6963}:PD:{ad47423f-540b-5a97-e386-ceff1f53db31
PassThroughClass :
PassThroughIds :
PassThroughNamespace :
PassThroughServer :
UniqueId : SCSI\Disk&Ven_FUJITSU&Prod_MHZ2120BH_G1\4&33c29369&0&000000:office-pc
AllocatedSize : 120034123776
CanPool : False
Description :
DeviceId : 0
EnclosureNumber :
FirmwareVersion : 0084000A
FriendlyName : PhysicalDisk0
IsIndicationEnabled :
IsPartial : True
LogicalSectorSize : 512
Manufacturer :
Model : FUJITSU MHZ2120BH G1
OtherCannotPoolReasonDescription :
PartNumber :
PhysicalLocation :
PhysicalSectorSize : 512
SerialNumber : K60VT9226KWM
Size : 120034123776
SlotNumber :
SoftwareVersion :
SpindleSpeed : 4294967295
PSComputerName :
CimClass : ROOT/Microsoft/Windows/Storage:MSFT_PhysicalDisk
CimInstanceProperties : {ObjectId, PassThroughClass, PassThroughIds, PassThroughNamespace...}
CimSystemProperties : Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure.CimSystemProperties
The two 1TB disks are the ones in the Pool.
Usage : Other
OperationalStatus : OK
HealthStatus : Healthy
ProvisioningTypeDefault : Fixed
SupportedProvisioningTypes : {Thin, Fixed}
ReadOnlyReason : None
RepairPolicy : Sequential
RetireMissingPhysicalDisks : Auto
WriteCacheSizeDefault : Auto
FileSystem : Unknown
Version : Windows Server 2012
ObjectId : {1}\\OFFICE-PC\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Providers_v2\SPACES_StoragePool.Objec
tId="{cef39ebe-7fba-11e3-8250-806e6f6e6963}:SP:{47405101-f1b2-11e1-be68-00247e572b9
2}"
PassThroughClass :
PassThroughIds :
PassThroughNamespace :
PassThroughServer :
UniqueId : {47405101-f1b2-11e1-be68-00247e572b92}
AllocatedSize : 1912871059456
ClearOnDeallocate : False
EnclosureAwareDefault : False
FriendlyName : StoragePool
IsClustered : False
IsPowerProtected : False
IsPrimordial : False
IsReadOnly : False
LogicalSectorSize : 4096
Name :
OtherOperationalStatusDescription :
OtherUsageDescription :
PhysicalSectorSize : 4096
ResiliencySettingNameDefault : Mirror
Size : 1998770405376
SupportsDeduplication : False
ThinProvisioningAlertThresholds : {70}
WriteCacheSizeMax : 107374182400
WriteCacheSizeMin : 0
PSComputerName :
CimClass : ROOT/Microsoft/Windows/Storage:MSFT_StoragePool
CimInstanceProperties : {ObjectId, PassThroughClass, PassThroughIds, PassThroughNamespace...}
CimSystemProperties : Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure.CimSystemProperties
Usage : Other
OperationalStatus : OK
HealthStatus : Healthy
ProvisioningTypeDefault : Fixed
SupportedProvisioningTypes : {Thin, Fixed}
ReadOnlyReason : None
RepairPolicy : Parallel
RetireMissingPhysicalDisks : Auto
WriteCacheSizeDefault : Auto
FileSystem : Unknown
Version : Windows Server 2012 R2
ObjectId : {1}\\OFFICE-PC\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Providers_v2\SPACES_StoragePool.Objec
tId="{cef39ebe-7fba-11e3-8250-806e6f6e6963}:SP:{cef39ebf-7fba-11e3-8250-806e6f6e696
3}"
PassThroughClass :
PassThroughIds :
PassThroughNamespace :
PassThroughServer :
UniqueId : {cef39ebf-7fba-11e3-8250-806e6f6e6963}
AllocatedSize : 2000137748480
ClearOnDeallocate : False
EnclosureAwareDefault : False
FriendlyName : Primordial
IsClustered : False
IsPowerProtected : False
IsPrimordial : True
IsReadOnly : False
LogicalSectorSize :
Name :
OtherOperationalStatusDescription :
OtherUsageDescription :
PhysicalSectorSize :
ResiliencySettingNameDefault : Mirror
Size : 2120443895296
SupportsDeduplication : False
ThinProvisioningAlertThresholds : {70}
WriteCacheSizeMax : 107374182400
WriteCacheSizeMin : 0
PSComputerName :
CimClass : ROOT/Microsoft/Windows/Storage:MSFT_StoragePool
CimInstanceProperties : {ObjectId, PassThroughClass, PassThroughIds, PassThroughNamespace...}
CimSystemProperties : Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure.CimSystemProperties
Usage : Other
NameFormat :
OperationalStatus : Detached
HealthStatus : Unhealthy
ProvisioningType : Thin
ParityLayout : Unknown
Access : Read/Write
UniqueIdFormat : Vendor Specific
DetachedReason : Incomplete
WriteCacheSize : 0
ObjectId : {1}\\OFFICE-PC\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Providers_v2\SPACES_VirtualDisk.Objec
tId="{cef39ebe-7fba-11e3-8250-806e6f6e6963}:VD:{47405101-f1b2-11e1-be68-00247e572b9
2}{4740510d-f1b2-11e1-be68-00247e572b92}"
PassThroughClass :
PassThroughIds :
PassThroughNamespace :
PassThroughServer :
UniqueId : 0D514047B2F1E111BE6800247E572B92
AllocatedSize : 955898658816
FootprintOnPool : 1911797317632
FriendlyName : Storage space
Interleave : 262144
IsDeduplicationEnabled : False
IsEnclosureAware : False
IsManualAttach : False
IsSnapshot : False
LogicalSectorSize : 4096
Name :
NumberOfAvailableCopies :
NumberOfColumns : 1
NumberOfDataCopies : 2
OtherOperationalStatusDescription :
OtherUsageDescription :
PhysicalDiskRedundancy : 1
PhysicalSectorSize : 4096
RequestNoSinglePointOfFailure : False
ResiliencySettingName : Mirror
Size : 998579896320
UniqueIdFormatDescription :
PSComputerName :
CimClass : ROOT/Microsoft/Windows/Storage:MSFT_VirtualDisk
CimInstanceProperties : {ObjectId, PassThroughClass, PassThroughIds, PassThroughNamespace...}
CimSystemProperties : Microsoft.Management.Infrastructure.CimSystemPropertiesThey do not show up in Disk Manager. They're part of a Storage Space, and the Virtual Disk for said storage space is not attached for some reason. Please see the logs per above from the get-virtualdisk command, and see a brief version below
FriendlyName ResiliencySettingNa OperationalStatus HealthStatus IsManualAttach
Size
me
Storage space Mirror Detached Unhealthy
False 930 GB -
How storage spaces mirror onto multiple storage pool drives...
Tricky question to pose..
I currently have 2 * 2TB drives in a storage pool. I have a 2 TB storage space assigned to this pool (lets call them A and B). I have 2TB of mirrored storage across 4TB of drives. All is well...
If I add a third 2TB drive "C" to the storage pool, how will 2-way mirroring work now? My hope is that it will evenly mirror across each drive in the pool ( 1TB mirrored across A + B, 1TB across A+ C and 1TB across B + C) giving me effectively
3TB of mirrored storage.
If it does work as I hope, does the server rebalance the mirroring? Say I have already used 1.8GB of storage by the time I add in the 3rd drive, there is only 0.2GB on each of the morrored drives available. When I add in the 3rd drive, if the
server does not re-allocate, then I would only gain 0.4GB of storage (0.2GB A+C, 0.2GB B+C) leaving 1.4GB unusable.
If not as I hoped, how do I make use of the 3rd drive? I assume the 3rd drive is useless in that pool unless I do 3-way mirroring or I add another 4th drive?
Thanks, Mark.Tricky question to pose..
I currently have 2 * 2TB drives in a storage pool. I have a 2 TB storage space assigned to this pool (lets call them A and B). I have 2TB of mirrored storage across 4TB of drives. All is well...
If I add a third 2TB drive "C" to the storage pool, how will 2-way mirroring work now? My hope is that it will evenly mirror across each drive in the pool ( 1TB mirrored across A + B, 1TB across A+ C and 1TB across B + C) giving me effectively
3TB of mirrored storage.
If it does work as I hope, does the server rebalance the mirroring? Say I have already used 1.8GB of storage by the time I add in the 3rd drive, there is only 0.2GB on each of the morrored drives available. When I add in the 3rd drive, if the
server does not re-allocate, then I would only gain 0.4GB of storage (0.2GB A+C, 0.2GB B+C) leaving 1.4GB unusable.
If not as I hoped, how do I make use of the 3rd drive? I assume the 3rd drive is useless in that pool unless I do 3-way mirroring or I add another 4th drive?
Thanks, Mark.
A Storage Spaces mirror configuration stores 2 copies of each data block on 2 different physical drives. However, it does not balance the data. So in your specific example, adding a third drive to a mirror environment won't help much.
You would really need to add a fourth 2 TB drive at the same time.
You can get more info on Storage Spaces here.
Maybe you are looking for
-
A question about development of livecylcle forms
Hello, I have been asked to build complex static forms for a client of ours using Livecycle Designer version 8.2. The forms are static (fixed field) forms that will not interact with users in any way. We will be populating the form fields from a .
-
Visually handicap, needs to increase font size in logic pro, Command doesn't work
Hi, I'm visually handicapped, and new to logic-pro. I'm having a miserable time reading the internal logic-pro fonts. Command + doesn't work, and I can't find any preferrence or settings options that affect the default font sizes, any ideas?
-
Hello, We have a Windows Server 2008 R2 with iis 7.5 with some app pools running. Every 4 days (exactly) we get 403 13 errors in our iis log and all client connections are refused. The only way to solve that problem is to reboot the server. The probl
-
Recovery not happening...
log are not applying, SQL> select process,sequence#,status from v$managed_standby; PROCESS SEQUENCE# STATUS ARCH 0 CONNECTED ARCH 0 CONNECTED ARCH 0 CONNECTED ARCH 0 CONNECTED RFS
-
Pleasant surprise with CSP UR points!
I logged in to check out my UR points balance and noticed my earnings on next statement was MUCH higher than anticipated. Since I'm still working on my intro spend I looked to find out if I had earned some other type of bonus or something. Turns out