Storage unit error

Hi,
          Im doing a transport order and we enter a SU existant. The system display the following error message:
"Storage unit 1000000000 is not consistent with other transfer order data".
We think that we can include in the same SU many materials, storage bin and quant number. It is posible?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Regards
Enzo

Hi Enzo,
In the WM system SU is always unique errspective of material, but you can store multiple material in one storage unit using mixed SU management consept .
For E.x: Two different materials or Two different batch materials can be placed in a single storage unit in this case two quants will be placed in a storage unit.
for the second question, If the stocsk available for the delivery quantity,it can be create single TO for any number of storage units for all the stocks, in this case quants will be different.
Thanks,
Madhu

Similar Messages

  • Unable to confirm transfer order due to error message "enter a storage unit

    Hi guys:
    I am unable to confirm transfer order due to error message popping up and saying "enter a storage unit", and I tried to search it in whole thread in the forum,it was suggestion to pick up destination storage unit via ls24, but I did went to ls24 and trying to click that line(transfer order) but unable to find the storage unit, so is there another way to fix it?

    Hi Allen...
    Pls check if your Storage Type is SU Active. If yes, then system will create a storage unit according to the setting done for the storage unit management, perhaps in your case you are confirmin TO for the putaway.
    Pls confirm and revert
    Regards
    Shiva

  • TO Error: Source HU ******* is not contained in Source storage unit *******

    Dear All,
    Our warehouse Handling Unit managed. I have created a delivery which is partially picked.
    After that when I am trying to create Transfer Order, I am getting an error "*Source HU ******* is not contained in Source storage unit ******"
    I am getting a pop up window in the name of "Enter withdrawal of Handling Units", and it is asking me to enter the Quantity to be repacked.
    I am getting this error only when I am doing Partial picking.
    How to get rid of this error. Kindly suggest.
    Regards,
    Mullairaja
    Edited by: MullaiRaja on May 26, 2011 10:47 AM

    Hello
    This can be the whole pallet have to be withdrawn from the source (flag LTAP-HOMVE is set on, 'X'), but HU picking control does not propose the source HU as the destination HU (flag LTAP-HUPIK is clear, ' '). Kindly check.
    If that is not the case then, for your reference refer following SAP notes:
    - 662020:      Processing of TO with different storage types
    - 514604:      Storage unit is not deleted when posting goods issue
    - 721901:      Errors LF-064, L3-848 while picking w/o pick-HU
    - 552073:      Message L3222 when creating transfer order with LT09
    - 505542:      Incomplete TO confirmation in Transaction LT0H & LT0I
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • Downloaded mavericks and now receive an error "the version of the server you are trying to connect is not supported" However I don't have a server I have a storage unit. How do I re-establish the connection

    I downloaded Mavericks and I now receive an error when I try to connect to my storage unit. I receive an error message that the 'server is not supported'. How do I correct this? Or how can I restore my previous operation system

    This may work for you:
    http://www.zdnet.com/mavericks-smb2-problem-and-fixes-7000022519/

  • Problems when creating a  transfer order for moving storage units

    Hi,
    When creating a TO for moving storage units with FM FU L_TO_CREATE_MOVE_SU i got problems when the storage unit consist of 2 items. The message 'Warehouse number does not exist (new selection required)'
    is displayed. When i use the FM again after this message then the TO is created correctly.
    When i debug the FM for 2 items is see that LEIN-LGNUM is empy en when performing:
    PERFORM T300_LESEN(SAPML03T) USING LEIN-LGNUM. and the message E080 is raised.
    The perform before this is determining the lein-lgnum (PERFORM LENUM_EINL_CHECK(SAPML03T) USING I_LENUM) but this value isnt passed to the calling program the first time (memory or something????)
    Does anyone have a solution for this problem?
    Thx in advance.
    Kind regards,
    John Nijburg

    Hello,
    I had the same problem today and I've fixed it by calling the FM in a different task (asychronous) .. this way the fugr/internal variables will be loaded again and you won't get this stupid error anymore. 
    CALL FUNCTION 'L_TO_CREATE_MOVE_SU' STARTING NEW TASK lv_task
    In case you need it syncronous use PERFORMING clause together with WAIT UNITL
    Hope this helps!
    Cristian

  • Mixing materials with different Goods Receipt date in the same Storage Unit

    Hello everybody,
    I´d like to know how  FIFO strategy would affect to this example:
    Adding boxes from one storage unit (pallet) to another storage unit (pallet). Both storage units have different goods receipt dates, so there is a pallet which has boxes with different GR dates.
    Would FIFO make difference among boxes inside the storage unit?. As far as I know, when adding stock (boxes) to a handling unit (pallet), the system keeps the oldest GR date and does not create new quant number for the incoming boxes
    Thanks in advance for your help

    Hi Nagesh,
    Thank you for the input. I am receiving Stock from vendor and while creating Inbound delivery i created the Handling Unit and also packed it and i could also post it (PG Receipt). Now when i am creating TO i have that error message. The Storage Location where i am receiving is 9001and i have also maintained the partner Storage location,,, its like this Plant(1000)-SLoc(9001)-Partner SLoc(9002).... now the Storage Location 9002 is not HU managed,, the reason i gave this Storage location is, initially i gave 9001, but system said "Storage Location 9001 and 9001 must have different management systems". So now kindly tell me what is the purpose of the partner Storage location and which storage location should i give, as my partner Storage location across "1000-9001-????" thank you again for ur inputs.
    Regards,
    Samuel

  • L_TO_CREATE_SINGLE  -  new storage unit is not created by SAP

    Hello Friends,
    I am using a FM L_TO_CREATE_SINGLE to create transfer order.
    But, When I am not passing Destination SU as import parameter, it gives me following error.
    "Storage unit XXXXXXX is not consistent with other transfer order data"
    This is happening in ECC 6.0. Earlier i was using ECC 5.0 and there was no problem.
    How can I get rid out of this problem?
    Regards,
    RH

    Hi,
    Check the long text of the message.
    It clearly says that
    "Data in the transfer order item (such as the quant number, storage bin or storage type) does not belong to the storage unit number that you entered."
    So check to see if the storage unit number you entered is correct.
    This seems to be a data issue.
    Regards,
    Ankur Parab

  • L_TO_CREATE_MULTIPLE  storage Units

    hi,
    I'm trying to create a transfer order using function module L_TO_CREATE_MULTIPLE  but on certain cases I am getting error "Requested amount could not be supplied". I implemented the  user exit MWMTO004- Function module EXIT_SAPLL03A_005   to  assign differents  storage units onto T_QMAT internal table.
    Example:
    An example: Using FIFO when i am creating a TO for 100 pieces with these functions
    In the warehouse there is this stock:
    1000011358                  10           
    1000011348                  20
    1000011349                  20          
    1000011350                  20
    1000011351                  10           
    1000011352                  20
    How do  i need define my stock removal strategies? or How to solve it??
    Regards .
    Mireya A.

    Hi,
    Please try it in this way by passing only these many data to the function module.
    wa_lqua-werks TO wa_ltap_creat-werks,
         wa_lqua-lgort TO wa_ltap_creat-lgort,
         wa_lqua-matnr TO wa_ltap_creat-matnr,
         wa_lqua-charg TO wa_ltap_creat-charg,
         wa_lqua-bestq TO wa_ltap_creat-bestq,
         wa_lqua-sobkz TO wa_ltap_creat-sobkz,
         wa_lqua-sonum TO wa_ltap_creat-sonum,
         wa_lqua-verme TO wa_ltap_creat-anfme,
         wa_lqua-meins TO wa_ltap_creat-altme,
         wa_lqua-lqnum TO wa_ltap_creat-vlqnr,
         wa_lqua-lenum TO wa_ltap_creat-vlenr,
         wa_lqua-lgtyp TO wa_ltap_creat-vltyp,
         wa_lqua-lgpla TO wa_ltap_creat-vlpla.
    CALL FUNCTION 'L_TO_CREATE_MULTIPLE'
           EXPORTING
                i_lgnum                = lgnum
                i_bwlvs                = bwlvs
                i_commit_work          = c_x
           IMPORTING
                e_tanum                = tanum
           TABLES
                t_ltap_creat           = i_ltap_creat
           EXCEPTIONS
                error_message          = 99.
    Regards
    Hareesh Menon

  • Palletization and storage unit management

    Hi,
    On the WM view 2 in material master, there is a section call palletization.
    Question:
    1 u2013 If this material is going to be used in a storage unit environment, is it COMPULSORY to maintain it? If not maintain it, will I face error during TO creation for SU process?
    2 u2013 Because we wouldnu2019t know the Storage unit type upfront until when the truck actually stop at our warehouse, and we using scanner to perform TO creation. Thus, under such scenario, is there a way in the system setup to bypass this maintenance in the material master and later still allow me to put in the SUT  Type I desire on the spot?
    tuff

    palleteziation data is maintained in material master so that at the time of TO system can know how much quantity will be stored on which  type of pallet and accordingly system will search for the BIN or it will find out that the bin is full
    In case you do not mention it in material master then ceratinly you will get the error that please enter the palletelization data during Transfer order creation
    Regards
    Rahul

  • Storage Unit Inconsistency!!

    Dear Experts,
    One background job in SAP which runs every 10mins got canceled because the storage unit was inconsistent with the transfer order data. I am not able to find the cause of this inconsistency of storage unit!!
    Any ideas??
    Regards

    Can I know what kind of error (details of inconsistencies) you are getting?

  • Storage unit type

    Hi,
    I would like to put a material away. but I get this error "Storage unit type is not allowed in storage type 050"
    where can I define the storage unit type for this storage type
    Thanks
    Dede

    Can you explain how you are getting this error ?
    Storage unit type navigation:
    SPRO->logistics execution->master data->material->define storage unit types
    Thanks
    Seshu

  • Storage Unit type controlling

    Hi,
    I have really a serious problem about storage unit type controlling in my wm project.
    I desinged the warehouse system according to some backround jobs like RLAUTA10. All my storage types managed with stoge units but we have just one storage unit type 001. But the problem is that when program RLAUTA10 run it gets errors about storage unit type. The job asks in every transfer requirement sut.I have just one sut and it must be default sut in system. Than the pragram RLAUTA10 can run as a backround job succuessfully.
    Thanks.

    Hello,
    Please check if you have maintained the palletization data in the material master in WM2 view.
    If you havent thats probably the cause why your background jobs are asking for SUT in TR's/
    Please check and hope this helps.
    Thanks,

  • Storage unit is without appendant HU

    When doing a goods receipt for an inbound delivery into an HU-managed storage location, I get this error: "Storage unit 00000000001000000111 is without appendant HU".
    Can some one help what this error is...........?
    Much appreciated!
    Edited by: Sylvia Hernandez on Mar 5, 2010 3:32 AM

    HU is created while packing the inbound delivery....SU is also create as part of TO confirmation...........when i try to come back and post PGR, the system gives the appendant error.
    Sylvia

  • R/3 request storage unit during TO confirmation

    Dear all,
    I bump into an obstacle while perform TO confirmation.
    During TO confirnmation, there is one screen requesting me to key in the storage unit.
    I tried to put in some of the storage unit from the the search screen (i.e. the little round shape next to the field), but system don't allow.
    May I know how to handle this?
    Do I need to create a new storage unit and put in to this field during TO confirmation?
    thanks
    tuff

    Dear Sinéad, and other,
    Ok this is how I bump into the error (in between, my WM knowledge has not reach the Storage Unit yet).
    I have created a TO for picking from a delivery order via VL02N's menu screen (i.e. movement type 601). Next, I perform a TO confirmation in LT12, and when I click the "Confirm Internally" button, R/3 jumps to this screen requesting the following two data:
    1- Storage unit
    << I tried to assign some randomly existing SU unit to this field but R/3 complaint "Storage unit 00157032650003548391 does not exist Message no. L3209">>
    2- Destination Storage Unit
    << I tried to assign some randomly existing SU unit to this field but R/3 complaint "Target handling unit 157032650000046104 is not assigned to TO 0000353991 Message no. L3822">>
    I just don't know how to proceed now as without the confirmation there is no picking (i.e. as the actual quantity field in the LT12 screen still empty) and there is a problem on PGI later on my delivery.
    Please teach me how to proceed when encounter above obstacles.
    thanks
    tuff

  • Create transfer order for moving storage units

    Hello guys,
    I need to create transfer order for moving storage units, the same with the transactions LT09, I found this FM 'L_TO_CREATE_MOVE_SU' but no work, somebody have an example for this FM, thanks a lot!

    Hello,
    I had the same problem today and I've fixed it by calling the FM in a different task (asychronous) .. this way the fugr/internal variables will be loaded again and you won't get this stupid error anymore. 
    CALL FUNCTION 'L_TO_CREATE_MOVE_SU' STARTING NEW TASK lv_task
    In case you need it syncronous use PERFORMING clause together with WAIT UNITL
    Hope this helps!
    Cristian

Maybe you are looking for