Strange iChat AV router issue

Hello all,
I'm hoping someone can shed light on the situation I'm having with iChat AV attempting to vidoeconference with Apple's test servers (appleu3test01, etc...) When attempting to videoconference to the test servers on a macbook pro (10.4.6) powerbook g4 1.5 (10.4.6) mac mini core solo (10.4.6) it does not function behind our router (Cisco 1841 IOS version 12.4 3v ). However it works fine when I attempt it using the same iSight camera and the same port on our swith that I test the powerbook and mac mini with on my old 600mhz G3 ibook (10.4.6). This is baffling me to no end and apple support has not been much help over the phone. For reference this problem existed before we enabled our firewall on the 1841 and continues to exist after we opened up all the requisite ports. The OS X firewalls on all the machines are disabled. A few other people on this board seem to have problems with other cisco equipment, does anyone have a solution? Thanks,
-Brian
Cliffs: same network, all variables constant except machine
Works: iBook g3 600mhz
Doesn't work: Powerbook G4, MacBook Pro, Mac Mini Core Solo
Edit: forgot the mention the error it gives is "Disconnected from video chat because: can't get video from the camera"

Here's the issue. VOIP as provided in our solution isn't handled through a separate box like vonage that i could just plug into the router rather than between the router an the modem. We have a T1 handled by the modem in a slot in the chassis of our Cisco 1841 router/firewall. The VOIP service is just a separate VLAN on the router. Also there were no configuration differences between the old ibook and any of the other machine's I've tried. It too was running 10.4.6, all current patches, etc... Our IP phones are Cisco 7960s which are on that separate VLAN.

Similar Messages

Routing Issue with 2 Nics on Windows Server 2008 R2

Good Day
My issue is I needed to set up port forwarding for a web server to communicate with our hotels management server to check availability.
Initially the server has a single Nic configured in the 172.26.1.0 /24 network , Its default gateway the Switch vlan interface 172.26.1.1
We have many vlans for all the systems in the hotel and the server also needs to communicate with 3 other servers on different subnets which it does just fine.
I now added an additional adsl line with a managed router which has an interface of 192.168.10.1 /24 , My servers second NIC has the IP address 192.168.10.2 with its gateway being the 192.168.10.1
This 192.168.10.0 network is in a L2 Vlan and the rest of the network does not know it exists. It was working fine then just stopped asfter i added a static route to the server , which i did with RRas... I did this as the server could not communicate with
just one of the servers..
If i disable the 172.26.1.0 NIC the port forwarding works but then obviously the rest of the network goes down.. I know its a routing issue but am lost
please help

Hello,
using multiple default gateways is not a good idea.
See details in http://support.microsoft.com/kb/159168/en-us
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
MVP, MCP, MCTS
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
Twitter:

Routing issue- seeing same IPs for two hops

Hello All,
I'm seeing two same IPs in the traceroute output. Is that due to routing issue that nexhop is as the same device for the first time?
Log:
6 10.30.102.26 61.060 ms 10.30.100.142 61.266 ms 10.30.102.26 61.071 ms
7 10.30.102.26 61.139 ms 61.211 ms 10.61.191.2 60.948 ms
Can you guys help me to fix the issue??
Regards,
Thiyagu

Are you load balancing anywhere?
6 10.30.102.26 61.060 ms
   10.30.100.142 61.266 ms
   10.30.102.26 61.071 ms
7 10.30.102.26 61.139 ms 61.211 ms
   10.61.191.2 60.948 ms
HTH,
John
*** Please rate all useful posts ***

Routing Issue with Telia

I think verizon has a routing issue with Telia.

thought I would share this, Telia has admited an issue on their network
Twitter / Telia_service: @Ungvall routing problem? This ...
https://twitter.com/Telia_service/status/179661595276881921
Cached
Similar
Share
View shared post
BTW Apparently @Telia_service had routing problems on both the latest iOS and ... DNS problem and we are working with Akamai for a sollution to this problem

Routing Issue with 3550

I am having a routing issue with a 3550 switch. I have 5 vlans and I need one of the vlans to access a different router based on destination IP rather than our edge router. I have entered a static route on the 3550 that points to the secondary router whenever a certain network is tried to be accessed. My problem is I can't seem to get the traffic to flow correctly. When I trace route an address on the Internet the path shows as expected, the 3550 then my firewall then my edge router. When I trace an address that is on the other side of the secondary router I get the 3550 as the first hop, then nothing. I can ping the address so I know the path is up. What could be the issue? Thanks in advance.

Hello,
in addition to Mahmood´s post, what do you have defined as the next hop for the default route to the secondary router ? If you use an interface on the 3550 as the next hop, make sure that whatever is connected is in the same subnet, otherwise use the IP address of the next hop. So, let´s say your remote network is 192.168.1.0, and the secondary router is connected to FastEthernet0/1, your default route should look like this if the secondary router is in the same subnet (in this example, the IP address of the secondary router would be 172.16.1.2):
interface FastEthernet0/1
no switchport
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip route 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 FastEthernet0/0
Otherwise, try:
ip route 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.1.2
where 172.16.1.2 would be the address of the secondary router.
Does that make sense ?
Regards,
GNT

No airtunes with pppoE due to routing issues?

I just switched to an optical fiber to the home internet connection (which is getting pretty popular here in Japan). Needless to say, the network is very fast, however, I can no longer use airtunes via my airport express network. The airport express stations (both of them) no longer show up in iTunes. My guess is that this is due to a routing issue and the same problem must have been encountered by others before and hopefully solved. The new internet connection uses pppoE to make a connection to the internet service provider. This gives me an internet address of the form 125.197.xx.yy. I still have my airport express set to get an address via dhcp (which the new optical fiber hub provides) and is of the typical private network form 192.168.1.4. When I am connected by pppoE to the internet, my iTunes cannot see my airport express due to routing issues I assume. Is there an elegant solution to this -- can I use my airtunes and the internet at the same time? Would modifying the internet routing help here (I have used this before when I have had multiple interfaces going (e.g. one in a secure local lan and the other supporting an internet connection via ssh to the outside world). Any advise would be much appreciated. I haven't tried asking my airport express to log in via pppoE -- is this the only solution?

Well as I have for my last several posts -- I solved the problem myself. I am pretty sure that the root cause was a routing problem (pretty obvious in fact). By have the airport express base station connect via pppoE itself (I have a remote relay airport express as well) and switching to NAT and DHCP distribution of addresses via the airport express, I can both see my airtunes as well as my ethernet connection. It is a non-ideal solution as I have a fixed IP which would have been convenient to log in from outside to, but I guess I can live with that.

Audio tracks playing different audio tracks - routing issue?

I'm having trouble with some routing issues I believe. Here's the deal:
Some audio tracks are playing different audio tracks, when that region is not even in it. For instance:
Track #2 is Soloed. Output is Output 1-2. I hear the audio file that is in Track #1, which is NOT Soloed and I shouldn't even hear. I don't hear anything from Track #2. The only way I can hear Track #2 is by playing it from the audio bin, which obviously isn't going to work out right.
If I drag the audio region of Track #2 to a brand new audio track, I still don't hear anything. Is it possible this audio file(s) got corrupted somehow?
Please help!

Chris Joye wrote:
I'm having trouble with some routing issues I believe. Here's the deal:
Some audio tracks are playing different audio tracks, when that region is not even in it. For instance:
Track #2 is Soloed. Output is Output 1-2. I hear the audio file that is in Track #1, which is NOT Soloed and I shouldn't even hear. I don't hear anything from Track #2. The only way I can hear Track #2 is by playing it from the audio bin, which obviously isn't going to work out right.
If I drag the audio region of Track #2 to a brand new audio track, I still don't hear anything. Is it possible this audio file(s) got corrupted somehow?
Please help!
Check the parameters, in the left side of the arrange page window.
To me, it sounds as if you have a bunch of arrange tracks, which are all playing back through audio track #1.
Cheers

IB Routing issue. Unable to find routing to the corresponding incoming msg

Hi All,
We are facing a Routing issue. The flow of message across the DB is given below.
1) Message will be triggered from 3rd party application to PeopleSoft portal with Service Operation A
2) From portal one more service operation B will be invoked to communicate with CRM
Both the service operations are synchronous. I have tested the Service operation in CRM and I am able to get the results. But in Portal if I test, I am getting the error like
+"Unable to find routing corresponding to the incoming request message"+
I have checked the routing alias name between Portal and CRM data bases and Its same.
could you please give us a clue to debug this further?
Thanks,
Hari.A

You should check which permission list the service operation is attached to, and check if the user has been granted to, Something like the following from the backend :
SELECT   distinct c.roleuser
FROM     psclassdefn a, psroleclass b, psroleuser c
WHERE    a.classid = b.classid
AND      b.rolename = c.rolename
AND      a.classid = '<permission_list>' If nothing is returned for your user, then you could created a new role and give it to the user.
Also, since you are on Peopletools 8.52, all this configuration settings can be done through Integration Network WorkCenter. I wrote articles about that (and you can find something about permission list for a given service operation as well) :
http://gasparotto.blogspot.nl/2012/11/peopletools-852-integration-network.html
Nicolas.

NO HELP WITH ROUTING ISSUES FROM VERIZON

Spend 2 hours with technical support to no avail. Have routing issues where I can’t get from my FIOS residential account to remote web site abroad. Trace route fails at so-0-0-0.XT1.AMS2.ALTER.NET [146.188.14.209]. FIOS technical support is incapable of doing any troubleshooting beyond basic customer premises equipment, refusing to escalate the case to network engineering team. I was basically told by FIOS tech support supervisor {edited for privacy} that this is not Verizon’s problem and no help will be provided. What is even more frustrating that Verizon agents are not capable of receiving emails from customers with details such as trace route.
Is there anyone at Verizon monitoring this and able to help? Just in case, ticket number that I have with Verizon is {edited for privacy}
Here is trace route details.
tracert 212.44.136.226
Tracing route to brserv.bridgetour.ru [212.44.136.226]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1     1 ms    <1 ms     1 ms Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
2    12 ms     9 ms     9 ms L100.BSTNMA-VFTTP-71.verizon-gni.net [98.118.28
1]
3    16 ms    19 ms    19 ms G0-6-4-1.BSTNMA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.
75.132]
4    45 ms    15 ms     8 ms ae3-0.BOS-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.151.6
5    19 ms    19 ms    19 ms 0.xe-3-2-0.IL1.NYC9.ALTER.NET [152.63.26.81]
6    21 ms    19 ms    19 ms 0.ge-1-2-0.IL1.NYC12.ALTER.NET [152.63.26.86]
7   107 ms   108 ms   107 ms so-0-0-0.XT1.AMS2.ALTER.NET [146.188.14.209]
8     *        *        *     Request timed out.
9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
10     *        *        *     Request timed out.
11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
12     *        *        *     Request timed out.
13     *        *        *     Request timed out.

BT help aren't always that helpful, but BT engineers claim that it is a BT sales issue and nothing to do with them seems a bit extreme.
Are you sure your daily speed is 8Mbits, not 8Mbytes? How are you measuring this? Is it the number coming from the BT speedtest?
If it really is 8Mb, then I think it's worth checking with the mods;  at: http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951 . But be aware they take 3 working days to reply: sometimes more if busy.

Verizon/Time Warner Routing Issue

I've been having trouble logging on to my email through Outlook, IPad, or IPhone. The service provider is Time Warner. Apparently the problem is a routing issue between Time Warner and Verizon and they've had the routing issues for over 2 months and have still not resolved the problem. Since no one at Verizon seems to know anything about this, does anyone have any information as to when the issue will be resolved?

I can sign in using webmail and see my email. But I can't use Outlook, my IPad or IPhone utilities to see my email using TW as a provider. If I'm anywhere else, using any other provider, I can use Outlook, my IPad and IPhone without any problems.
When I called TW, they told me the problem was a routing issue that both TW and Verizon were working on and had been working on for at least 2 months, but no solution yet. They were surprised that no one at Verizon knew this.
Since everything worked fine until a week ago and nothing changed in my settings and Verizon verified that everything was set up correctly, I'm satisfied that this is the issue. My concern is that not one Verizon representative has acknowledged that there is a routing problem between TW and Verizon; especially if the problem has existed well over 2 months. You would think that an issue like this should be shared among all their troubleshooting team.

Possible internet routing issues driving me crazy!

I've somehow hit a problem accessing a particular favourite website and it seems I may have a routing issue.
I've spoken with a friend who is fairly network savvy and he's suggested I raise a case \ complaint with BT. I thought I'd use this forum to test if I'm missing something I could be doing to fix it before logging a problem with BT Helpdesk!
I've a BT Homehub 2 (Current firmware   4.7.5.1.83.3.5 (Type B) and I can access pretty much all websites I care to look at without any issue at all, however the site I read most days is now no longer viewable on any of my 2 PC's nor my iPhone. When I try to access it I get no error messages at all just a blank white page.
Doesn't matter if I try using IE or Firefox or Chrome browers it's the same result - I just see a blank white page.
The site in question www.celticquicknews.co.uk (or www.celticquicknews.com) and is definitely available, as I can access it when using a site such as http://www.free-internet-organization.tk/ on both my PC's and iphone so I know the web site is up and running and available for browsing but since Thursday lunchtime I've had no joy in being to access that particular site directly wihout resorting to using another middleman site to let me view it.
I have tweeted the guy who hosts the www.celticquicknews.co.uk site and he's said his site is fine but has numerous similar queries around BTINTERNET folks having the same issue as I'm reporting.
I run McAfee Internet Security and having disabled the various firewall \secure browsing functions no improvement still no joy.
I did successfully somehow connect directy to the illusive web site this morning (Sunday 1st May) on my iphone at around 10am, but by the time I boiled the kettle to have a coffeee and sit and read the site it became inaccessable again on my iphone and both my PC's! So what's going on?
www.celticquicknews.co.uk [217.174.253.143]
www.celticquicknews.com [217.174.253.143]
Homehub TCP\IP info is as below which I suspect is of value to the more techincal on the forum:
Broadband network IP address   109.152.154.29
Default gateway   217.32.142.102
Primary DNS   194.72.0.114
Secondary DNS   62.6.40.162
ADSL line status
Connection Information
Line state   Connected
Connection time   0 days, 01:11:16
Downstream   15,978 Kbps
Upstream   1,144 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI   0/38
Type   PPPoA
Modulation   G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type   Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up)   5.2 dB / 6.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)   31.0 dB / 13.8 dB
Output power (Down/Up)   23.6 dBm / 1.7 dBm
C:\>tracert -d 217.174.253.143
Tracing route to 217.174.253.143 over a maximum of 30 hops
1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms 192.168.1.254
2    15 ms    15 ms    15 ms 217.32.142.102
3    18 ms    17 ms    16 ms 217.32.142.142
4    22 ms    22 ms    21 ms 213.120.163.26
5    22 ms    20 ms    21 ms 217.32.27.30
6    21 ms    21 ms    21 ms 217.32.27.178
7    22 ms    21 ms    21 ms 109.159.250.78
8    33 ms    35 ms    35 ms 109.159.250.13
9    28 ms    28 ms    29 ms 62.172.102.1
10    29 ms    28 ms    28 ms 195.66.224.98
11    33 ms    34 ms    33 ms 88.208.255.61
12    38 ms    32 ms    33 ms 88.208.255.102
13     *        *        *     Request timed out.
14     *        *        *     Request timed out.
15     *        *        *     Request timed out.
16     *        *        *     Request timed out.
17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
18     *        *        *     Request timed out.
19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
20     *        *        *     Request timed out.
21     *        *        *     Request timed out.
22     *        *        *     Request timed out.
23     *        *        *     Request timed out.
24     *        *        *     Request timed out.
25     *        *        *     Request timed out.
26     *        *        *     Request timed out.
27     *        *        *     Request timed out.
28     *        *        *     Request timed out.
29     *        *        *     Request timed out.
30     *        *        *     Request timed out.
Trace complete.
C:\>
I've reset my HH several times over the weekend and am baffled as to how I can somehow have 1 site excluded from my browsing options for no obvious reason other than a suspected internet routing issue.
My iPhone is on ORANGE and when disabling the wireless connection it too is unable to view the site in question so it's a real pain!
Not sure where to go to progress this so any help \ guidance is very much appreciated.......
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Appreciate the help....been out for most of the day and checked in to see if any additional posts.
I tried pinging the site and it does seem to resolve OK and also tried accessing site via IP but same issue - blank white page.
>ping www.celticquicknews.co.uk
Pinging www.celticquicknews.co.uk [217.174.253.143] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Then tried the telnet command "telnet 217.174.253.143 80" and I do not get any errors and as suggested the command prompt goes blank but no matter what I type I get no errors or response from server 217.174.253.143.
My IP address has changed from this morning and sadly still same issue for me.
Internet connection configuration
Connection Information
Connection time
0 days, 10:05:37
Data Transmitted/Received (MB)
10.8 / 29.4
Broadband username
[email protected]
Password
Not configured
TCP/IP settings
Broadband network IP address
86.147.168.198
Default gateway
217.32.142.102
Primary DNS
194.72.0.114
Secondary DNS
62.6.40.162
The tracert comments make sense so that's helped me understand, thanks for checking that out.
So what's the best option for me? Am I wasting BT and my own time logging a case?
I'd not usually bother pursuing this for the sake of a single web site but I'm bemused how this has happened since last week?
Thanks again for all help and guidance.
PJ

Will a 2 port LAG setup between 2 cisco 200-50s create routing issues?

I followed this guide. http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/GetArticle.aspx?docid=caae365b755f46f5989177cb68216304_Link_Aggregation_on_Cisco_Series_Managed_Switches.xml&pid=2&converted=0 and linked ports 2 and 26 on both switches. Outside IT staff seems to think this will cause routing issues if multiple vlans are not involved.

Hello,
VLANs are not required for LAGs to function properly. Once you configure the LAG members you can configure the LAG as a trunk port with multiple VLANs, and access port with just one, or even a routed port with an IP address on it.
As long as both sides of the LAG are configured the same way there won't be an issue. Since these switches are Layer 2 only, they don't even do any kind of routing, so your outside IT may have meant a layer 2 loop, which will happen with multiple connections between the same switches. But when you configure them as a LAG is treats those links as the same connection, so there is no layer 2 loop either.
Hope that helps,
Christopher Ebert - Advanced Network Support Engineer
Cisco Small Business Support Center
*please rate helpful posts*

IChat video connection issue, not related to router

I received a brand new 20" iMac Core 2 Duo just yesterday and intended to use iChat AV to video conference with my girlfriend, who has a 12" iBook G4 1.2GHz with an iSight and all system software up-to-date.
We both have DSL connections at home. We also both have wireless routers. The very first time we tried a video conference, it worked perfectly without a hiccup and everything just looked and sounded wonderful. At the time, she was connected wirelessly and I was connected both wirelessly and through Ethernet to my router's local network.
The second time we tried it (only a few hours later), seemingly without having changed any settings, it failed to work, and hasn't worked since. At first, we would get Error -22, saying something about how bandwidth is insufficient to maintain a video conference. However, I do not believe bandwidth is the real issue since all other network/internet tasks on both ends are spiffy as usual. We also both tried turning off Airport and just connecting through Ethernet to our routers' local network. Same problem.
To then determine if the problem was with one our routers, we both set them aside and plugged our DSL modems directly into our computers and connected to the internet with PPPoE. This appears to partially fix the problem: we are able to initiate a video conference, we both have audio, I can see her, but she can't see me; sort of a one-sided conference. On my screen, the image of myself freezes as soon as the conference is initiated. So unless I'm missing something, the ultimate cause of this problem doesn't appear to be the routers.
You can bet I tried a bunch of the common tips mentioned in this discussion forum before posting this question, such as changing the iChat port in the preferences, turning off Firewalls in the Sharing preferences and changing Quicktime streaming speed.
In summary, it worked once and hasn't worked since, and routers do not appear to be the cause of the issue. Does anyone have any further advice for me? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
iMac 20" Intel Core 2 Duo 2.16GHz Mac OS X (10.4.7)

First off I want to thank James for his willingness to help me test connections today. James has suggested I check into upping my Mother's connection. I will definitely look into that.
I wanted to update the thread that I tried the three test accounts at Apple (appleu3test01-3) and had success from all three on my home computer via my wireless configuration no less. This is what stumps me about my connection issues with my Mother - we can both connect to others but between us we get error -8's since iChat 3. I also find it odd that this is happening even though we are both Earthlink customers - I would chalk it up to routing tables or something if we were on different ISP's.

Macbook Pro 15" (late 2013) - Cant get proper 802.11ac WiFi-speed. Mac or router issue?

Hey
Im from Norway and just bought the 2013 Macbook Pro Retina 15 inch. My router is an Asus RT-AC66U, which should be capable of 1.3 Gbps connection speeds. When i connect my mac to this router on a 5 GHz network with N+AC only mode, i only get a link speed of about 200Mbps, often lower aswell. I was under the impression that you should get the theoretical maximum speed of the 802.11x youre using, as link speed. When i go to "about this mac"-"system report"-WiFi" it clearly says that im connected with 802.11ac. Why do i get such a low transmission rate? Its a problem with bootcamp aswell (Windows 8.1), which leads me to belive that the router mighth be the issue?

It seems that i have found a solution to the problem, but at the same time encountered a new one. The router was the problem. I live in an apartment building with many other students, and there are tons of other WiFi signals from other apartments. The router was in N+AC (there doesnt seem to be an AC only mode as of now?), and the signal strenght was around -40dB (Macbook placed three meters from router with no obstacles in the way). I downloaded a program called inSSIDer for Office and scanned all the network and associated channels and it turned out the router hadn't exactly choosen the optimal channel. When I changed the channel to a less populated one (44), the link-speed suddenly jumped from around 200 to a little over 1000 Mbps. I really didnt know just how sensitive to interferrence WiFi truly is.
The strange thing in windows though is that even though the linkspeed is great (i get much lower link-speeds in Windows, 400-600 (seems to be stuck at 802.11n in windows) compared to 800-1300 in OSX) i max out at 30 Mbps download (speedtest.net), while upload speeds remains unaffected at 94 Mbps (100/100 Mbps subscription). And when I turn on automatic channel selection on the router the link speed goes down to about 200 again (because of the interference issue), but the download speeds go up to 94 Mbps. This is not an issue in OSX, so maybe its an Windows Boradcom driver issue or something?

Cisco C827-4V router issues

Hi,
I have the Cisco 827--------PIX-------Cable The 827 has 1 San Antonio 2 Portland 5 San Diego 6 Phoenix 7 San Jose 8 Denver 9 Dallas 10 Chicago 11 Boston 12 Houston 13 Garden Grove 14 Seattle 26 Minneapolis 3 Glendale 18 Hartford 19 Charlotte 21 Cleveland 22 South Beloit This setup Thanks very much following escenario and I'm having some issues getting calls to most of the offices; the strange part it that the calls work for about 4 out of the 18 locations and they're all configured the same; here is the equipment I'm using:
modem
a 4 port voice module and this is what happens when we try to call other locations which in most cases have 2620 or 2621 routers with voice cards as well:
001, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
002, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
005, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
006, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
007, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
008, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
009, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
010, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
011, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
012, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
013, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
014, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
026, rings once, dialtone, additional digits do not break dialtone, times out with dead air
003, Dead air, times out with a busy
018, Works
019, Works
021, Works
022, Works
worked long time ago when the router was on the outside with no firewall; and again with the current set up, it works for 4 of the locations and I'd like to know if somebody over there has a similar scenario and would like to share any information.

I think its some config problems in the PIX .
Add commands the following commands in PIX.
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00801fc74a.shtml

Strange iChat AV router issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for