Strange Problem While Archiving

Hi Experts,
I am able to archive messages but the problem here if i menstion specific Interface which has to be archieved then it is not working. In the sense that with this interface it is archiving other messages also. I want to do conditions specific archinving not all the messages.
Please provide me the answer and don't provide me the links which has the steps of archiving. Because i alread followed those links and done the successful.
Thanks in Advance,
Best Regards,
Vijay

Similar Messages

Problem while archiving faulty files in File Sender Adapter

Hi All,
I am facing some problem while archiving the faulty files using Sender File adapter.
I have configured the option in the File Sender Channel to archive the files to some
other location. I have configured some custom modules inorder to perform conversion.
My file adapter is not archiving the faulty files. Please help me in this regard asap.
Best Regards,
Surya

I have checked with all the authorization issues. It is still no archiving the faulty file.
Can you please explain the mechanism behind this concept?
How File adapter will decide that it is faulty? On what basis?
How Modules play a role here?
Regards,
Surya.

Strange problem while clearing a customer

Hi everybody
I am encountering this strange problem while trying to clear some open items for certain customers. Though these customers have open items on them (checked in BSID and FBL5N), the system is giving a warning message saying that there are no open items on the customers while trying F-30 and F-32.
The only thing that was different for these customers from the rest was that these customers had some transactions which were supposed to be cleared through AP payment run. (transactions for customer payment).
Can anybody explain why the system was not considering these line items as open while accessing F-30 and F-32??

Hi,
- check SAP Note 136754
some table fields in the missing documents using Transaction SE16. The following conditions must exist:
BSIS-XOPVW = X      (Indicator: Open item management, only for G/L                     accounts)
BSEG-XOPVW = X      (Indicator: Open item management)
BSEG-AUGBL = space (clearing document number)
BSEG-DISBN = space (discount document number)
BKPF-BSTAT = space (document status)
BKPF-XSTOV = space (indicator reversal flag)
REGUS/REGUP -> see below
Should one or more conditions not exist, please note the following information:
1. BSEG-XOPVW <> X or BSIS-XOPVW <> X for G/L account line items:
              The line item presumably comes from a time before you activated the open item management of a G/L account. Documents before this master record change do not contain this technical information. Use report RFSEPA02 if you want to bring the documents in line with the new master record. You must refer to the documentation of this report.
              Because there may be problems subsequently acivating open item management, RFSEPA02 was changed as of Release 4.5A so that it cannot be started without modifications. SAP wants to make sure you are familiar with the problems, which may result from activating open item management. You can however restart RFSEPA02 when you have deactivated the line:
              leave program.
2. BSEG-XOPVW <> X for open item account line items:
              This data status is not allowed. Contact the SAP Hotline.
3. BSEG-DISBN <> space.
              The line item has already been used within bill of exchange accounting.
4. BKPF-BSTAT <> space.
              This is a document with a special function, for example a sample document or recurring entry document. Generally these are not taken into account in clearing transactions.
5. BKPF-XSTOV <> space.
              The document was flagged for reversal. Only if you cancel the reversal flag, can you clear the document again. You can do this by removing the planned date for the reverse posting (BKPF-STODT) in the document header using Transaction FB02 (Change document).
6. REGUS/REGUP:
              Look at table REGUS using Transaction SE16. Enter the account (KONKO) in the selection screen. If you selected an entry, use the information Run date (LAUFD) and Identification (LAUFI) in Transaction F110 (payment program). Check the status of the payment run. If only the proposal was carried out, the documents proposed for payment are blocked for other clearing transactions. It is only when you delete the proposal run that the items are taken into account again in the clearing transaction.
Rgds.

Strange problem while execution of query....

Hi Friends
I am facing a strange problem while executing the query.
I have one query ,its old one ,till yesterday everday it was working fine ,
But today i am trying to execute that query ,execution process takes very long time ,finally no response from bw server.
its an important report in our company
I checked query , Every thing is ok ,bze i haven't made any changes
So i need some suggetions .like where can i check and what can i do?
ASAP .... So Please ...its very urgent....
EVERY THING AND ANY THING WILL BE REWARED
Thanks in advance
RK

Hi
Stefan
Thank you for your valuable suggestion
the problem is solved
Already i assigned points.
Thnaks & Regards
RK

Strange problem while building a secondary index.

Hi,
I have a strange problem in creating a secondary index which is a part of primary data.
I tested my program and a working sample program
My data scheme looks like:
   Key = unique string
   Data = structure {
                    time_t timestamp;
    Secondary Key = timestamp in data (NOT unique)
My BDB environment flags is "DB_CREATE | DB_INIT_CDB | DB_INIT_MPOOL | DB_THREAD"
The primary DB is created as BTREE with a custom key compare function provided by calling DB->set_bt_compare.
int my_key_compare(DB *db, const DBT *key1, const DBT *key2)
     const char *k1_v = (const char *)key1->data;
     const char *k2_v = (const char *)key2->data;
     return strcmp(k1_v, k2_v);
The secondary Index DB is created as BTREE while permitting duplication. (DB_DUPSORT)
It has two custom callback functions; one for data compare, the other for extracting a data from the primary data.
int my_extract_timestamp(DB *db, const DBT *primary_key, const DBT *primary_data, DBT *secdondary_key)
     secondary_key->data = ( (MY_DATA *)(primary_data->data))->timestamp;
     secondary_key->size = sizeof(time_t);
     return 0;
int my_secondary_dup_compare(DB *db, const DBT *key1, const DBT *key2)
     time_t      k1_v = *(time_t *)key1->data;
     time_t      k2_v = *(time_t *)key2->data;
     return k1_v - k2_v;
The function 'my_extract_timestamp' is set by calling DB->associate().
My problem is 'my_secondary_dup_compare' function called with a strange DBT values.
I think the values should point to the value provided from my_extract_timestamp(), but they pointed to
the key which provided when calling DB->put on the primary DB.
Could somebody help me ?
Any help highly appreciated.

Hi,
In the secondary database, the key is what you extract and the data is the key of the primary database. As your primary key is a unique string, your data in secondary database is also a unique string. The DB->set_dup_compare sets the comparison function for the duplicate data, so you are comparing time stamps on unique strings, not on what you extract.
As you are comparing the time stamps which are the keys of secondary database, I guess here you want to set the bt_compare function instead of the dup_compare for the secondary database.
Also, about this sentence:
secondary_key->data = ( (MY_DATA *)(primary_data->data))->timestamp;
The DBT.data should be an address, but this is a value here instead of an address.
Regards,
Winter, Oracle Berkeley DB

Strange problem while login to SCN in Internet explorer

Dear All,
I am facing a strange problem, where i am unable to login into SCN through Internet explorer, as when i click logon button a blank screen is coming and the login screen is not opening.Its happening both in my office and house.
This question i am posting through google chrome, where i am able to get the below screen.
The attached image is what i am getting i am talking about
Is this problem coming for everyone,kindly let me know.As in my office we are using only Internet explorer and i am unable to work on SCN.
Kindly let me know bout it.Since i am active in this module, i am posting the question here.
Thanks&Regards
Darshan Desai

Hi,
Please repost at SCN Support to get quick solution.
IE 9 is best suitable for our forum. IE 11 is not working as required. I am also using Google Chrome at home. But at office i am using IE9.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Strange Problem While Recording

I have a PushBufferStream that I separated in 4, because the first one have 4 videos multiplexed. Then I tried to record one of the new PushBufferStreams by wrapping it in a new DataSource in a new Processor. I created the DataSink and started to record and it worked well. But the video file generated (an .AVI) have a strange problem. It has the duration of the original DataSource, not the duration of the recording time. If I start the original DataSource now and after one minute record the PushBufferStream by 5 seconds, the video file created have 1minute and 5 seconds. In the first image just a static image (the first frame) is shown, and in the lasts 5 seconds the video is shown normaly.
Does anyone could help me, I don�t know what could I do to solve the problem? Thanks.

just a thought, check how much memory your app is using, is it storing a minuites worth of video in memory, then when yu record for your five seconds, it's dumpng the whole lot into your avi file.
maybe empty your buffer before you record.

A strange problem while Solaris9 CC compile union

I met a strange question while using solaris9 CC to compile my code.
These codes looks like as following:
typedef
struct {
int len;
union {
DWORD u;
#if BYTE_ORDER == BIG_ENDIAN
struct {
BYTE ext1 : 1;
BYTE codingStd : 2;
BYTE infoTransCap : 5;
BYTE ext2 : 1;
BYTE transMode : 2;
BYTE infoTransRate : 5;
BYTE ext3 : 1;
BYTE rateMutiplier : 7;
BYTE ext4 : 1;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
} U4;
struct {
BYTE EXT1 : 1;
BYTE CODINGSTD : 2;
BYTE INFOTRANSCAP : 5;
BYTE EXT2 : 1;
BYTE TRANSMODE : 2;
BYTE INFOTRANSRATE : 5;
BYTE EXT3 : 1;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE : 8;
} U3;
#elif BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN
struct {
BYTE infoTransCap : 5;
BYTE codingStd : 2;
BYTE ext1 : 1;
BYTE infoTransRate : 5;
BYTE transMode : 2;
BYTE ext2 : 1;
BYTE rateMutiplier : 7;
BYTE ext3 : 1;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE ext4 : 1;
} U4;
struct {
BYTE INFOTRANSCAP : 5;
BYTE CODINGSTD : 2;
BYTE EXT1 : 1;
BYTE INFOTRANSRATE : 5;
BYTE TRANSMODE : 2;
BYTE EXT2 : 1;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE EXT3 : 1;
BYTE : 8;
} U3;
#endif /* BYTE_ORDER */
}_U;
} CaBEARER, *CaLPBEARER;
at xxx.cpp , I write some codes:
bearer._U.U3.EXT1 = 0x01;
bearer._U.U3.CODINGSTD = 0x01;
bearer._U.U3.INFOTRANSCAP = 0x08;
bearer._U.U3.EXT2 = 0x01;
bearer._U.U3.TRANSMODE = 0x00;
bearer._U.U3.INFOTRANSRATE = 0x00;
bearer._U.U3.EXT3 = 0x01;
bearer._U.U3.LAYER1IDENT = 0x01;
bearer._U.U3.USERINFOLAYER = 0x05;
But I compile it, CC reports these errors
Error: Badly formed expression.
Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
What' wong with these codes? how to do ?
Thank you!

At a.h
typedef
struct {
int len;
union {
DWORD u;
#if BYTE_ORDER == BIG_ENDIAN
struct {
BYTE ext1 : 1;
BYTE codingStd : 2;
BYTE infoTransCap : 5;
BYTE ext2 : 1;
BYTE transMode : 2;
BYTE infoTransRate : 5;
BYTE ext3 : 1;
BYTE rateMutiplier : 7;
BYTE ext4 : 1;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
} U4;
struct {
BYTE EXT1 : 1;
BYTE CODINGSTD : 2;
BYTE INFOTRANSCAP : 5;
BYTE EXT2 : 1;
BYTE TRANSMODE : 2;
BYTE INFOTRANSRATE : 5;
BYTE EXT3 : 1;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE : 8;
} U3;
#elif BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN
struct {
BYTE infoTransCap : 5;
BYTE codingStd : 2;
BYTE ext1 : 1;
BYTE infoTransRate : 5;
BYTE transMode : 2;
BYTE ext2 : 1;
BYTE rateMutiplier : 7;
BYTE ext3 : 1;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE ext4 : 1;
} U4;
struct {
BYTE INFOTRANSCAP : 5;
BYTE CODINGSTD : 2;
BYTE EXT1 : 1;
BYTE INFOTRANSRATE : 5;
BYTE TRANSMODE : 2;
BYTE EXT2 : 1;
BYTE USERINFOLAYER : 5;
BYTE LAYER1IDENT : 2;
BYTE EXT3 : 1;
BYTE : 8;
} U3;
#endif /* BYTE_ORDER */
}_U;
} CaBEARER, *CaLPBEARER;
At b.cpp
#include "a.h"
CaBEARER bearer;
1:bearer._U.U3.EXT1 = 0x01;
2:bearer._U.U3.CODINGSTD = 0x01;
3:bearer._U.U3.INFOTRANSCAP = 0x08;
4:bearer._U.U3.EXT2 = 0x01;
5:bearer._U.U3.TRANSMODE = 0x00;
6:bearer._U.U3.INFOTRANSRATE = 0x00;
7:bearer._U.U3.EXT3 = 0x01;
8:bearer._U.U3.LAYER1IDENT = 0x01;
9:bearer._U.U3.USERINFOLAYER = 0x05;
But I compile it, CC reports these errors
Line 1:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 1:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 2:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 2:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 3:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 3:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 4:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 4:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 5:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 5:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 6:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 6:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 7:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 7:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 7:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 8:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 8:Error: Badly formed expression.
Line 9:Error: Identifier expected instead of "0x00000001".
Line 9:Error: Badly formed expression.

Strange problem while syncronizing catalog

I am doing a syncronization, once every two weeks or so. Since I started using Lightroom 3 (now 3.3) I end up with a very strange problem, that makes it almost impossible to sync the catalog.
I get the window were it tells me to "add" pictures or movies without "moving" the images, then after I push the buttom it only takes a moment before I get up a dialog box were it tells me; " Community toolbar" with bold text and then "We're sorry, but the Safari browser version you are currently using does not support the community toolbar"
If I do not push "OK", so that the dialog box dissapeare the syncronization will not move on. For every image I want to ad the same dialog box appears and I have to push "ok" again.
Do not understand this at all. I have tried to update the Safari. I also been in contact with the phone support that could not help me.
Anyone?
// Torbjorn

Hello
I use Mac OSX 10.6.6
Do not have any add-ons
And Yes it is when I syncronize the hole catalog. In the catalog I have several folders.
//Torbjorn

Problem while archiving the redo Log

Hi all,
I m having few issues in my server...
I get the following error in the alert log of oracle..
There are many errors
1) No space left on device
2) ARC0: I/O error 19502 archiving log 1 to
'/oracle/admin/SNM/arch/arch_1_393_668727286.arc'
ARCH: Archival stopped, error occurred. Will continue retrying
3) ORA-16014: log 1 sequence# 393 not archive*d, no available destinations*
Also please find the v$log file query
SQL> select * from v$log;
GROUP# THREAD# SEQUENCE# BYTES MEMBERS ARC STATUS
FIRST_CHANGE# FIRST_TIM
1 1 405 1073741824 1 NO CURRENT
60275455 20-OCT-09
2 1 403 1073741824 1 NO INACTIVE
59987366 19-OCT-09
3 1 404 1073741824 1 NO INACTIVE
60125083 20-OCT-09
Also the diskspace is almost 97%.
Can anyone let me know whether archival of redo log files is causing the issue here?
If so if i stop the archival of logs ,will it solve the problem?
Can anyone help me on this?
Mon Oct 19 09:54:39 2009
Errors in file /oracle/admin/SNM/bdump/snm_arc0_23831.trc:
ORA-19502: write error on file
"/oracle/admin/SNM/arch/arch_1_393_668727286.arc", blockno
577537 (blocksize=512)
ORA-27063: number of bytes read/written is incorrect
SVR4 Error: 28: No space left on device
Additional information: -1
Additional information: 1048576
ORA-19502: write error on file
"/oracle/admin/SNM/arch/arch_1_393_668727286.arc", blockno
559105 (blocksize=512)
Mon Oct 19 09:54:39 2009
Errors in file /oracle/admin/SNM/bdump/snm_arc0_23831.trc:
ORA-19502: write error on file
"/oracle/admin/SNM/arch/arch_1_393_668727286.arc", blockno
577537 (blocksize=512)
ORA-27063: number of bytes read/written is incorrect
SVR4 Error: 28: No space left on device
Additional information: -1
Additional information: 1048576
ORA-19502: write error on file
*"/oracle/admin/SNM/arch/arch_1_393_668727286.arc", blockno*
*559105 (blocksize=512)*
ARC0: I/O error 19502 archiving log 1 to
'/oracle/admin/SNM/arch/arch_1_393_668727286.arc'
ARCH: Archival stopped, error occurred. Will continue retrying
Mon Oct 19 09:54:40 2009
ORACLE Instance SNM - Archival Error
Mon Oct 19 09:54:40 2009
ORA-16038: log 1 sequence# 393 cannot be archived
ORA-19502: write error on file "", blockno (blocksize=)
ORA-00312: online log 1 thread 1: '/oracle/oradata/SNM/redo01.log'
Mon Oct 19 09:54:40 2009
Errors in file /oracle/admin/SNM/bdump/snm_arc0_23831.trc:
ORA-16038: log 1 sequence# 393 cannot be archived
ORA-19502: write error on file "", blockno (blocksize=)
ORA-00312: online log 1 thread 1: '/oracle/oradata/SNM/redo01.log'
Mon Oct 19 09:54:40 2009
ARCH: Archival stopped, error occurred. Will continue retrying
Mon Oct 19 09:54:40 2009
ORACLE Instance SNM - Archival Error
Mon Oct 19 09:54:40 2009
ORA-16014: log 1 sequence# 393 not archived, no available destinations
ORA-00312: online log 1 thread 1: '/oracle/oradata/SNM/redo01.log'
Mon Oct 19 09:54:40 2009
Errors in file /oracle/admin/SNM/bdump/snm_arc1_23833.trc:
ORA-16014: log 1 sequence# 393 not archive*d, no available destinations*
ORA-00312: online log 1 thread 1: '/oracle/oradata/SNM/redo01.log'
Mon Oct 19 10:00:16 2009
ARC0: Encountered disk I/O error 19502
Mon Oct 19 10:00:16 2009
ARC0: Closing local archive destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1:
'/oracle/admin/SNM/arch/arch_1_393_668727286.arc' (error
19502)
(SNM)

yes it is the production server.
Also the arch folder contains 2 GB file - arc file....
Does disable of archival will solve the issue?
I am try to clear the space or move to some other location..But the thing is my application files is of 3 to 4 GB.remaining thing is of dbf files.
6564 drwxr-x--- 2 oracle oinstall 512 Oct 21 2008 .
6563 drwxr-x--- 3 oracle oinstall 512 Oct 21 2008 ..
6568 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 7061504 Sep 30 11:58 control01.ctl
6569 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 7061504 Sep 30 11:58 control02.ctl
6570 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 7061504 Sep 30 11:58 control03.ctl
9283 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 5128192 Sep 30 10:21 mfxpima.dbf
6600 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 17179877376 Sep 30 11:50 muse0.dbf
6572 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 1073742336 Sep 30 08:10 redo01.log
6573 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 1073742336 Sep 30 10:16 redo02.log
6574 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 1073742336 Sep 30 11:58 redo03.log
6578 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 19293806592 Sep 30 11:58 sysaux01.dbf
6576 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 1698701312 Sep 30 11:56 system01.dbf
6579 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 2147491840 Sep 30 11:04 temp01.dbf
6577 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 4084211712 Sep 30 11:58 undotbs01.dbf
6580 -rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 5251072 Sep 30 10:21 users01.dbf
What as to be done....in this case....
Help me out...
I have no other option ....
SRinivasan

Strange problem while executing the Query.......

Hi,
I have created a new query and I am facing the strange behaviour.
When I execute it , it works fine but when one of my colleague execute it , it does not return any value for one of the Price variable.
It works fine with most of the people I have checked except one.
Can somebody let me know the reason.....?
Thanks , Jeetu

Hello,
If it is authorization problem go to transaction st01 and mark the first check for authorization. Under filter insert the user. Click Trace On.
Execute the query with that user and just after the lack of authorization message click trace off.
Read the trace.
Do the same with your user and compare the log of the two.
You'll see what is missing.
Assign points if helpful.
Diogo.

Problem while archiving a smartform

Dear All,
We have implemented records management and in GMGRANT tcode, we created button and which would create a smartform when we press that. Based on the Archive link settings from OAAD tcode, when ever we try to archive that smartform, it would trigger event 'ASSIGNED', we did type linkage for this even and assign a custom function module. There we designed to add this smartform as an element to Grant record. Its working perfectly in Production till yesterday. Suddently, its not working now, and when I checked the event trace, this event is not getting triggered. Would you let me know the possible reasons for this??
Thanks and regards,
Chandra.

Dear All,
We have implemented records management and in GMGRANT tcode, we created button and which would create a smartform when we press that. Based on the Archive link settings from OAAD tcode, when ever we try to archive that smartform, it would trigger event 'ASSIGNED', we did type linkage for this even and assign a custom function module. There we designed to add this smartform as an element to Grant record. Its working perfectly in Production till yesterday. Suddently, its not working now, and when I checked the event trace, this event is not getting triggered. Would you let me know the possible reasons for this??
Thanks and regards,
Chandra.

Strange problem while checking Mandatory fields

Hi ,
I am checking mandatory fields with the method following method.
CL_WD_DYNAMIC_TOOL=>CHECK_MANDATORY_ATTR_ON_VIEW( VIEW_CONTROLLER = my_controller ).
It was working fine for mandatory fields and also showing one extra input field which is not mandatory with red border .
Please tell me how to avoid this and What could be the problem.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Vijay

Hi Vijay,
            the extra vield thats showing in re d will be a field that doesnt support blank entry. try commenting the method thats calling CL_WD_DYNAMIC_TOOL.
            CL_WD_DYNAMIC_TOOL=>CHECK_MANDATORY_ATTR_ON_VIEW will check only mandatory fields.. thats for sure.
   the error message thats showing on the optional fild is coming from some standard check
Regards
Sarath

Strange Problem while deploying BPEL processes by ANT Script.

Hi,
Ant script is working fine in Dev environment but is failing in the other environment. Somehow the BPEL server is not able to pick the latest deployed process , due to this the dependent BPEL processes are failing. If we restart the server , it moves forward and then fails at the point where it couldn’t find reference to the processes deployed after restart. Restarting the server at every failed interval will deploy all the BPEL processes which is not the solution.
example : we have BPEL Processes say A, B, C, D and E. A,B are independent processes C is dependent on A, D is independent and E is dependent on D. So I have Ant script to deploy in A,B,C,D,E order. Now I run the Ant Script: It deploys A,B processes and Fails at C saying it couldn't find the process A.wsdl(But A is deployed). So if i restart now it recognizes A and B are deployed so C is also deployed succesfully it also deploys D as it is Independent but fails at E. If i restart the server E is also deployed.
The Environment is clustered.
Any suggestion to make my Ant script to run at a go will be highly appreciated
Thanks
Krishna
Edited by: KrishnaBhaskarla on Oct 30, 2008 5:22 PM

Krishna,
Could we see your ant script? If you are using oc4j andmin_client.jar, there is a -redeploy command which may prove helpful. You might redeploy AB, then CD, then E.
-Mike

Problem while adding SAP Netweaver 7.3 As Java in Solution Manager 7.1

Hi All,
We are facing strange problem while configuring managed system- SAP Netweaver 7.3 As Java in Solution manager 7.1 SP3. We added this system in SLD of solution manager and synchronized it with LMDB. As a result this As Java system is present under Technical systems in SMSY. Now we are assigning Product system to it with Landscape verification tool. But the problem is when we try to save after assigning Product version as SAP Netweaver and Product as SAP Netweaver 7.3. It always gives below error:
Fatal error trying to update Technical System (UPDATE_TSYSTEMS). Update could not be executed.
Product instance 54 not found
Product instance number error keep on changing depend upon what usage i select like ADS 7.3, Application Server Java 7.3 etc.
Please suggest if someone has faced this issue.
Thanks
Sunny

Hi Sunny,
You can refer to my first blog on this topic:
#sapadmin:: How to assign Product System in SOLMAN 7.1 & How LMDB, SLD, SMSY and Landscape Verification work in SOLMAN7.1
Try to select only one product instance in LMDB and saved. After that, you can add more product instance in SMSY.
Hope it helps.
Cheers,
Nicholas Chang

Strange Problem While Archiving

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for