Strange & Unique requirement

need some great favour from you all. Please help me with your valuable inputs.
I have R/3(ECC 6.0) and SRM5.0 systems.
Now my communication is between R/3 & SRM-EBP(Component of SRM).
I will have to send the PO data along with its attachments to SRM-EBP from R/3.
Normally if only PO data, we have two ways to do. By standard ALE/IDOC or handle through XI. But the problem is even the attachments stored in those POs should be transferred to SRM-EBP.
More clearity on attachments in PO:
Normally they attach some documents like PDFs, txt file or even mails also to maintain some PO history or rather kind of versioning in R/e. You can see this by clicking the button "Service for Objects" on the Top Left hand corner.
First of all, is this possible through XI?
If yes, how?
If no, atleast by anyother ways?
Your inputs on this very highly appreciated.
Please let me know if you need any more info.
Many Thanks for your help.
Siva

Hey
as far as i know IDOC doesn't support attachments,you need to use proxy for this,ABAP proxy supports attachments.
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/04/19/xi-rfc-or-abap-proxy-abap-proxies-with-attachments
Thanx
Aamir

Similar Messages

Creation of movt.type - unique requirement

Dear Friends,
Here i am enclosing my unique requirement to create a movement type. In sales returns PGR (Post goods receipt) done automatically material document will be updated. This is value is picks in material master, this is normal process.
In normal process PGR done the fi entry is
Finished Goods Dr Eg. Rs.1000
COGS Cr Eg. Rs.1000
My requirement is to create a new movement type which can not hit regular GL both the Finished goods and COGS (which is mentioned in the above entry) when PGR done, to hit separate GL. Kindly tell me how to create a new movement type which is supports the above requirement and where i can assign new GL.
Pls tell me its very urgent.

I dont think its possible, as what u r thinking
Movement type only gives u the transaction keys
and in OBYC this transaction keys gl accounts are attached.
more over u can not make ur own movement type. U will have to create movement type by coping the std movement type only .
so when u copy this transaction keys are also copied. and this u cant change
look in OMWN u cant chang any thing hear.
so i think its not posible to by creating new movement type
hope this cleares
reward if useful

Parallel Processing in ODI with Unique Requirement

Hi All,
I have a unique requirement. I have a scenerio which i have to run multiple times in parallel with different user inputs.
Eg Suppose user inputs A,B,C then i have to run the same scenerio 3 times with input filter as A B and C respectively in parallel.
If user inputs A,B,C, and D then i have to run the same scenerio 4 times with inputs A B C and D in parallel.
Does any one know a way to achieve this.
Thanks in advance for your suggestions...
Regards
Edited by: 872116 on Jul 12, 2011 11:32 PM

Hi,
Take at look at the following 2 articles. Using the concepts outlined in them you should be able to achieve what you are trying to do.
http://odiexperts.com/interface-parallel-execution-a-new-solution
http://odiexperts.com/processing-multiple-interface-through-single-package

Sales Returms - unique requirement

Dear Friends,
The following is my unique requirement to process Sales returns. For sales returns i am using order type RE and movement type 655, 653 and 651. By using this movement types and order types PGR (Post goods receipt) will happen, stocks are moved in to unrest. use or QI. Upto this well and good. My requirement is the value of material is make to zero.
when PGR is done the entry is
Finished goods Dr Eg. Rs1000
COGS Cr Eg. Rs.1000
The above price is maintains in material master (VPRS), When ever PGR done this should be make zero it means that particular GL should not contain any value. If any body knows please tell me how to do the same. This is very urgent for me, kindly tell me.
Regards
Eswar
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>

Hi,
VPRS condition works as per requirement routine,the logic of this routine is
--Plant should be entered in the line item and there sould not be any billing plans in the order then only the requirement will satisfy and the condition type triggred during sales order creation.
Solution1:
You deactivate detemine cost check box in the return item category REN and try it.Iam sure it works,if it not works follow below,
Solution2:
Now if you do not want this to be determined during return sales,then you make customized routine and assgn this at requirement of pricing procedure without distrubing std. code. based on SD document category(for ex:H),so that you can arrive solution.
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Regards,
Chandra

Unique Requirement: No Financial entry only Inventory posting.

My client has a unique requirement.
He wants that for one of the Item Groups there should be no financial posting ie it should not reflect in Excise Registry but they want the same Item Group to have all inventory postings and records.
How to solve this
Khushwant

There is an item named "subcontracting" which my client is calling to all the outsourced job alloted to my clients from its Business Partner.
Their job is to do the job for its business partner on turnkey basis. They use to get the Raw Material from their Business Partner only and Finished goods are then forwarded back to my client's Business Partner.
In all this transaction no exise are affected although the items are excisable actually(in real world) but not in SAP.
So they dont want the Financial Entry to occur but only Inventory Tracking provision should be there in SAP.
Kindly Solve the issue if possible.
Regards
Khushwant

Voe4 : unique requirement

Dear Gurus
i have a unique requirement
in our existing scenerio, we have one vendor and one customer. thus in vendor master, we are maintaining in customer account field as single customer.
we also have a case of mutliple vendor one customer case which is also working fine which works fine by maintaining customer account field ( of vendor master) as single common customer.
in the present requirement we have one vendor but multiple customers. how to configure the same.
in the vendor master, we can maintain only one customer.
plz advice.

There is an item named "subcontracting" which my client is calling to all the outsourced job alloted to my clients from its Business Partner.
Their job is to do the job for its business partner on turnkey basis. They use to get the Raw Material from their Business Partner only and Finished goods are then forwarded back to my client's Business Partner.
In all this transaction no exise are affected although the items are excisable actually(in real world) but not in SAP.
So they dont want the Financial Entry to occur but only Inventory Tracking provision should be there in SAP.
Kindly Solve the issue if possible.
Regards
Khushwant

Unique requirement

Hi frenz,
There is a unique requirement from the client.
For PO returns we are following the sales process.
i.e treating the vendor as customer and selling the return material to them.(this is done for Excise recoverable)
They want Sales Account to be determined into Purchasing account.
i.e they want to assign a G/L account of Consumption/Purchase group in the Revenue account determination.
Is ther a way to do it.
regards,
Sathya

Hi Sathya,
Check the setting in OB40
Check the G/L account assignment in the tax code maintenance in FTXp transaction.
go to FTXP transaction enter your tax code then go in to the details of the tax code in the detail screen you place the cursor on tax Condition type then click on tax account tabs here you check G/L account asigened or not
If not assigned do the assignment then try.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Strange Unique Key Error When Copying Cube

I have an empty cube (cube2) I checked it many times. I am copying data from cube1 using an info package. In Info Package I set delete option, i.e., delete existing data in cube2 before loading.
As soon as loading starts, I get a short dump with error message:
An entry was to be entered into the table |
"\FUNCTION=RSAR_ODS_GET\DATA=L_TH_ISOSMAP" (which should have
had a unique table key (UNIQUE KEY)).
However, there already existed a line with an identical key.
The insert-operation could have occurred as a result of an INSERT- or
MOVE command, or in conjunction with a SELECT ... INTO.
The statement "INSERT INITIAL LINE ..." cannot be used to insert several
| initial lines into a table with a unique key.
I tried other cubes, same error occurs. I checked on SN, people have encountered this error but solution is not posted. Any idea, how can I get rid of the error.
Thanks a lot.

Hi
Try to load from Cube1 to cube2 without using that option and see if it loads. If that works then add an extra step on the
process chain ' Delete overlapping requests from the target ' after the infopackage load .
Thanks
Jay.

Unique Requirement regaridng SY-UNAME

Folks,
We have been on SAP system for 10 years. The SAP login user name till this point are made up of names. Now they want to change it to alpah numeric one that includes personnel number. Almost all the transaction data in SAP records the created by information which until now is based on names. After the conversion, it will be a number.
Since it will be difficult to recognize a person based on the number, the business wants a conversion to happen that translates the number into a name format.
We considered using screen exits. But it will help hand picked transactions. Owing to the volume of changes, we are considering implementing CONVERSION EXITS and change the domains of system fields like UNAME, XUBNAME, UBNAME, etc.
Your opinion on this matter is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Manoj

Hi Manoj,
1. I personally feel that
 such requirement should not be encouraged.
2. Tampering with the user Id/ user names
 either for data purpose / display purpose
is not suggested. It may create confusions.
3. Regarding personnel number,
 sometimes it happens that due to business
 circumstances, a new number is given
 to the same person.
(The old number is shown as resigned)
4. Moreover,
 whenever we look at a screen,
 and we see the user id,
 then from the name (user id)
 one can somewhat know about the actual person.
 But from personnel number,
 it is practically impossible.
5. Tampering with the source information
 about the userids,
 (the information is almost 10 years old - as u said)
is practically not advisable
in my opinion irrespective of
whatever trick/conversion exit/data manipulation/etc
we use.
6 This requirement is almost like
 changing 10,000 material codes in the system,
 chaning the company codes so that
 the code Looks & Feels Nice!
 etc etc.
 Afterall , what is the point in doing that ?
 what will be the gain ?
 - absolutely nothing !
Regards,
Amit M.
Message was edited by: Amit Mittal

A unique requirment for business process

I have recd. a unique requiment for GRs. My clients wants to block selected GRs for parking the invoice. No one should be able to park the invoice against such GRs without permission from authority.
Can we map this procdure???
If Yes then HOW??
Atul Kulkarni

Try using this BADI : INVOICE_UPDATE ,
You can use the business add-in (INVOICE_UPDATE) to further process the following functions or, if necessary, forbid them:
Creating invoices (invoices, credit memos, subsequent debits, subsequent credits) in Logistics Invoice Verification
Parking documents in Logistics Invoice Verification, and making changes to these documents, for example, deleting them
Regards
Raviraj

SRM EBP - XI - SRM SUS

This is very similar to my earlier post with title "Strange & Unique requirement".
Now I have to send all the POs along with those attachments which are in EBP to SUS with the help of XI.
Any thoughts please.
Thanks
siva

Thanks: Nichil.
I follow your instructions., when I make simulation in Generation Log. show all lights in yellow color for example:
Receiver Determination(s):
| SRD_009 | PurchaseOrderRequest_Out | * | *
Analysis
Required sender communication component: | SRD_009 A receiver determination was found for the connection All receivers are contained in the receiver determination found
Results
The reused receiver determination is already assigned to the configuration scenario
Notes
Check the conditions for all receivers of the receiver determination. The default result value for the generated condition is: TRUE
I am message for test and I can see the message into PI the estatus is Recorded and flag is color Green.
but no show an error or problems only stay in Recorded Status , othe observation into the SXMB_MONI the fiel Receiver component and Receiver Interface are empty,
what you suggets ?
best regards.

AR - Requirement to split the receivable line

As part of implementing OrderToCash for an international shipping company, we have a unique requirement to split the receivable line with respect to the number of revenue lines.
Due to the accounting doc having one receivable line, we are facing challenges in applying cash and disputing at the individual line item (shipment level).
We effectively need there to be a 1:1 relationship between a Billing document line and an AR invoice line (currently the AR receivable line is a cumulation of the Billing lines). This said, is there any configuration or user-exit on the SD or AR side to split the receivable line (at the time of releasing it to accounting) even though it is hitting the same reconciliation account?
Thanks,
Anthony

Hi Anthony
I know that when you enter FI side invoice we can use the 'Amount split' tab on FB70 or FB60 screen after entering the total amount in the 'Basic data' tab.
But I am not sure how to enable it when using copy control from delivery to billing to accounting.
Assign points if useful...
Thanks

The book "" was not copied to the iPad because it requires a newer version of ibooks

Hi - i've been working on a textbook in iboos author for a week and have been using preview as well as the "file / Export" function to copy the book to my ipad 3. Now all of a sudden, I am getting this strange "..requires a newer version of ibooks" error. I have not done any updates to either ibooks author or ibooks on my ipad. The book also won't copy to my older ipads which also worked fine before. I've reinstalled ibooks and ibooks author on all devices, but am still gettting this error. Even when i go and create a new book from scratch using the template picker and just save a fresh new file, I am getting the same error.
Has anyone had this problem as well ?
Thanks for any suggestions
Marc

thye chean - i've already uninstalled and reisntalled ibooks author version 1.1 (190) and I am still getting the same error message.

View joining two spatial tables and strange CBO behaviour

Hi all,
I've following view in my database:
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW my_view AS
SELECT id, 'table1' AS source, location FROM my_table1
UNION ALL
SELECT id, 'table2' AS source, location FROM my_table2;
When I execute query:
SELECT * FROM my_view WHERE SDO_RELATE(location, SDO_GEOMETRY(...), 'mask=anyinteract') = 'TRUE';
It works as expected.
When running query like (getting location with subquery):
SELECT * FROM my_view WHERE SDO_RELATE(location, (SELECT location FROM my_table3 WHERE id = 123, 'mask=anyinteract') = 'TRUE';
It doesn't work. Oracle Throws "DatabaseError: ORA-13226: interface not supported without a spatial index"
Further investigation revealed strange behaviour of CBO:
In first case Oracle CBO uses Spatial index just fine and as expected.
But second query and CBO get's a bit strange - unique index scan is used for subselect, but for view tables is full table scan is used and SDO_RELATE is not happy with that since no spatial index is used.
How I can use spatial indexes regardless of that subselect?

Hi folks,
Looking over these responses and not finding a lot of clarity yet in terms of leaving a trail for future readers to glean an answer from. I was just looking through the back-and-forth and curious myself about the issue First of all I think Jani's observations are quite on target. This CBO reaction is weird and does not work they way most Oracle users would expect it to work. Secondly, Jani really should tell us his Oracle version and folks providing answers should as well - the CBO is always being tweaked. Thirdly, Stefan provides a solution though it's a rather expensive solution to my taste. And finally, I think we as a group need to spend a bit more time reproducing things in code. I will give it a shot, feel free to correct anything I got wrong.
So first of all, I wrote this up quick on 12.1.0.2 and verified it was the same on 11.2.0.4
DROP TABLE my_table1 PURGE;
CREATE TABLE my_table1(
 objectid INTEGER NOT NULL
 ,tsource VARCHAR2(30 Char)
 ,shape MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY
 ,PRIMARY KEY(objectid)
DROP TABLE my_table2 PURGE;
CREATE TABLE my_table2(
 objectid INTEGER NOT NULL
 ,tsource VARCHAR2(30 Char)
 ,shape MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY
 ,PRIMARY KEY(objectid)
DROP TABLE my_table3 PURGE;
CREATE TABLE my_table3(
 objectid INTEGER NOT NULL
 ,tsource VARCHAR2(30 Char)
 ,shape MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY
 ,PRIMARY KEY(objectid)
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE seeder(
 p_count IN NUMBER
AS
 sdo_foo MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY;
 int_counter NUMBER := 1;
 FUNCTION random_line
 RETURN MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY
 AS
 num_x1 NUMBER;
 num_y1 NUMBER;
 num_offx NUMBER;
 num_offy NUMBER;
 BEGIN
 num_x1 := dbms_random.value(-179,179);
 num_y1 := dbms_random.value(-89,89);
 RETURN MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(
 2002
 ,8265
 ,NULL
 ,MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,2,1)
 ,MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(
 num_x1
 ,num_y1
 ,num_x1 + 0.0001
 ,num_y1 + 0.0001
 END random_line;
BEGIN
 FOR i IN 1 .. p_count
 LOOP
 sdo_foo := random_line();
 INSERT INTO my_table1
 VALUES (
 int_counter
 ,'table1'
 ,sdo_foo
 int_counter := int_counter + 1;
 sdo_foo := random_line();
 INSERT INTO my_table2
 VALUES (
 int_counter
 ,'table2'
 ,sdo_foo
 int_counter := int_counter + 1;
 sdo_foo := random_line();
 INSERT INTO my_table3
 VALUES (
 int_counter
 ,'table3'
 ,sdo_foo
 int_counter := int_counter + 1;
 END LOOP;
 INSERT INTO my_table1
 VALUES (
 0
 ,'table1'
 ,MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(
 2002
 ,8265
 ,NULL
 ,MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,2,1)
 ,MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(
 -87.8211111
 ,42.5847222
 ,-87.8212
 ,42.5848
 INSERT INTO my_table3
 VALUES (
 0
 ,'table3'
 ,MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(
 2002
 ,8265
 ,NULL
 ,MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,2,1)
 ,MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(
 -87.8211111
 ,42.5848
 ,-87.8212
 ,42.5847222
 COMMIT;
END seeder;
BEGIN
 seeder(100000);
END;
SELECT 'my_table1: ' || COUNT(*) AS invalid_count FROM my_table1 WHERE MDSYS.SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(shape,0.05) <> 'TRUE'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'my_table2: ' || COUNT(*) AS invalid_count FROM my_table2 WHERE MDSYS.SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(shape,0.05) <> 'TRUE'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'my_table3: ' || COUNT(*) AS invalid_count FROM my_table3 WHERE MDSYS.SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(shape,0.05) <> 'TRUE';
BEGIN
 INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata(
 table_name
 ,column_name
 ,diminfo
 ,srid
 ) VALUES (
 'MY_TABLE1'
 ,'SHAPE'
 ,MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ARRAY(MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X',-180,180,.05),MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y',-90,90,.05))
 ,8265
 COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
 WHEN OTHERS
 THEN
 NULL;
END;
BEGIN
 INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata(
 table_name
 ,column_name
 ,diminfo
 ,srid
 ) VALUES (
 'MY_TABLE2'
 ,'SHAPE'
 ,MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ARRAY(MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X',-180,180,.05),MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y',-90,90,.05))
 ,8265
 COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
 WHEN OTHERS
 THEN
 NULL;
END;
BEGIN
 INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata(
 table_name
 ,column_name
 ,diminfo
 ,srid
 ) VALUES (
 'MY_TABLE3'
 ,'SHAPE'
 ,MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ARRAY(MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X',-180,180,.05),MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y',-90,90,.05))
 ,8265
 COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
 WHEN OTHERS
 THEN
 NULL;
END;
CREATE INDEX my_table1_spx ON my_table1
(shape)
INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX
NOPARALLEL;
CREATE INDEX my_table2_spx ON my_table2
(shape)
INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX
NOPARALLEL;
CREATE INDEX my_table3_spx ON my_table3
(shape)
INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX
NOPARALLEL;
BEGIN
 dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(USER, 'MY_TABLE1');
 dbms_stats.gather_index_stats(USER, 'MY_TABLE1_SPX');
 dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(USER, 'MY_TABLE2');
 dbms_stats.gather_index_stats(USER, 'MY_TABLE2_SPX');
 dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(USER, 'MY_TABLE3');
 dbms_stats.gather_index_stats(USER, 'MY_TABLE3_SPX');
END;
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW my_view
AS
SELECT
objectid
,'table1' AS tsource
,shape
FROM
my_table1
UNION ALL
SELECT
objectid
,'table2' AS tsource
,shape
FROM my_table2;
set timing on;
-- QUERY #1
-- Jani's original setup, works as expected
SELECT
COUNT(*) AS single_geom_counter
FROM
my_view a
WHERE
MDSYS.SDO_RELATE(
 a.shape
 ,MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(
 2002
 ,8265
 ,NULL
 ,MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,2,1)
 ,MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(
 -87.8211111
 ,42.5848
 ,-87.8212
 ,42.5847222
 ,'mask=anyinteract'
) = 'TRUE';
-- QUERY #2
-- Now the problem statement
SELECT
COUNT(*) AS table_problem_counter
FROM
my_view a
WHERE
MDSYS.SDO_RELATE(
 a.shape
 ,(SELECT b.shape FROM my_table3 b WHERE b.objectid = 0)
 ,'mask=anyinteract'
) = 'TRUE';
-- QUERY #3
-- Stefan's solution
SELECT /*+ ORDERED */
COUNT(*) AS stefans_solution
FROM
my_table3 a
,my_view b
WHERE
a.objectid = 0
AND MDSYS.SDO_RELATE(
 a.shape
 ,b.shape
 ,'mask=anyinteract'
) = 'TRUE';
Anyhow, so the hard coded query #1 that Jani provided works exactly the way most folks would expect, the second item in the relate is applied to each spatial index participating in the view. I think we can agree this is what we want.
Now when we move on to the problem, well its all goes off the rails as I think its looks to apply the spatial filter to the view itself which lacks an index (not sure really)
So as Stefan says, you can work around this by rewriting things as query #3 does above though now its a full table scan of both tables in the view. This is a long way performance wise from Query #1!
So on my 12c test box
 query #1 Elapsed: 00:00:00.016
 query #3 Elapsed: 00:00:33.534
On 11g production box
 query #1 Elapsed: 00:00:00.49
 query #3 Elapsed: 00:02:31.45 (ouch!)
So hopefully someone else can jump in with more information on better solutions?
I overall tend to avoid the kind of unioned views that Jani is using here. I have a hard time recalling why but I must have been burned similarly many years ago when I was first starting with Oracle spatial. I tend to always want my spatial indexes right there where I can keep a grim stink eye on them. It may be that a unioned view with multiple spatial indexes behind it might just be a bad practice better done with a materialized view? Or maybe a lesser term? Unprofitable practice? fraught? "Best if you don't do that"?
Anyhow, I would be interested in what others have as input on the matter.
Cheers,
Paul

Pointers required in BW Reporting -

SDNers,
I need some help in setting up some unique requirements of my client.
1. How do I have exception color coding for a characteristic. I have the following - risk number ( KF ) and I need to show 1- "ATTN" / 2- "Normal" / 3- "HIGH" based on the risk value with color coding of red , yellow and Green. I understand I can have exception color coding for the risk number but how do I acheive this?
2. I have a requirement to have a RRI jump on single click. I did find an onclick provision in the web template - but is there any api for using the onclick functionality through javascript.
3. One more requirement is to have comments displayed in the template . my options are :
a. use an ABAP report
b. somehow show it in BW web template - the scenario is that the user( project manager) will give comments on project overruns and that has to be displayed on the template for everyone else to see - the size of the comment is restricted to 255 characters and stored in a table in R/3. How do i handle this?
I need all the help I can get ...
Arun Varadarajan

Ashwin,
Thanks for the reply but...
1. Exception reporting is for a KF and I have to highlight a Characteristic - This topic was also discussed earlier but am unable to find the thread.
2. If you select view source for a web template - you will have each value with a onclick=; which means that there is an API available for the same - I am trying to find the same. I can do it with crystal reports but it would involve changes to the setup we have with respect to EP Integration etc.
3. A dummy characteristic can accept only 60 characters , I have to show atleast 255 characters - and as of now the only available solution seems to be ABAP - any ideas on how to do it through BW - one option I read about was :
1. Split it into pieces of 60 each and then concatenate them in the cell definition in the table modify class - but this will not work if we are to have drilldowns - and with regard to using documents - the client does not want to click and get the data - h/she wants to see it on screen. Also how do I show documents for all values rather than only at the header level ?
2. Change the translation length or something like that to allow for 132 characters - but was unable to find the same.
Any other options ?

Strange & Unique requirement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for