Strange/wrong sorting

I have a master-detail form with an update-able detail-query. In the detail there is a number (no ID or foreigen key, just a number). If we order by this column in the select, everything is fine. If we remove the order by and enable sorting in the column attributes, the sorting is rubish.
By accident we recognised, that the detailregion is ordered by the column, which follows after the "sortcolumn" in the select-statement. After we changed the select-Statement (just changed the columns) everything is ok.
Does anybody has an idea what happened ?

Solved in latest update!

Similar Messages

Wrong sorting of events

I have several Events called ! Event 1 and ! Event 2 and so on...
(That these are on top when sorting via names).
No problem with iPhoto 09, but iPhoto 11 has wrong sorting, even when i sort it via names.
Some ! Event x are in the beginning, then some "normal" names without ! are in and then again some with ! ....

Solved in latest update!

Wrong sort order for rapid sequences of images

When I have a sequence of shots taken at high speed, i.e. a number of them have the same timestamp, being taken within the same second, I find that LR displays some of them out of order. For instance, I have a sequence of 5 frames all with timestamp 9/4/07 2:17:32pm and the file names show up in this order - 1740, 1742, 1741, 1743, 1744 (these are the file names assigned by the camera)
The frames show in this order with any of the sort order options selected except, of course, File Name, and in that one instance they display in the correct order.
Is there a way I can specify in LR that I want to sort in Capture Time order then within that in file name order? This would give me the result I want. The reason I don't want to simply use file name order is that with images from different cameras with differing file naming conventions, or with file names I may have applied, that would not give me correct time sequence as shot. I want to see a whole day's images in correct time sequence regardless of file name.
If there is not a way to specify this in LR, should I add this to the Feature Request list?

Capture Time and Import Order do the same thing.
Additional information - I see the same wrong sequence is presented in the import dialog when I try to import the same photos again (they happen to still be on the card). So, I think it is initially caused by the order that the camera lays down the photos in the file structure on the card, or in the way that Windows reads them off the disk. (I have a Canon EOS 30D, SanDisk CF card, using a card reader rather than plugging the camera to the PC.)
If I use the import dialog's renaming process (in my test I chose filename - sequence) and apply a sequence number to the images the sequence number ends up wrong. So LR is importing the photos in the wrong order (may not be LR's fault?)
So, this modifies the definition of the problem and of the feature request. No longer is it simply the sort order displayed in the library; it needs to be addressed at import time as well.
Here is my attempt to redefine the feature request:
- when importing images that are taken in rapid sequence (multiple shots within the same second) LR should allow for sorting the images by camera-derived file name to correct out-of-sequence delivery from the card/camera. This sort order, when selected, should re-arrange the preview thumbnails so the photographer can verify the images will be imported in the correct order.

"View- Sort Photos- By Title" produces WRONG sorting order!

Hello,
I have a set of pictures named Scan 1.jpg, Scan 2.jpg, Scan 3.jpg, etc... up to Scan 102.jpg
They all belong to the same "Event" in iPhoto.
When I am inside that Event, I need them to be sorted by their name (Scan 1, Scan 2, Scan 3, etc).
So I choose the option: View->Sort Photos->By Title
However, that shows pictures in the wrong order, as follows: Scan 1, Scan 10, Scan 100, Scan 101, Scan 102, Scan 11, Scan 12, Scan 13, etc, Scan 19, Scan 2, Scan 20, Scan 21, Scan 21, etc... The logic is clear but it is wrong!
Finder recognizes the correct order of files, named in such way, so why doesn't iPhoto?!
Please suggest if you have any solutions OTHER than renaming the original files to Scan 001, Scan 002, etc. I assume that would work, but I really would hate to spend time on renaming. There must be an easier way. I am surprised that iPhoto makes this mistake in the first place - I remember coming across this issue during Windows Explorer times. When I switched to Mac it was a pleasant surprise that Finder understands in such situations that the order should be 1, 2 3, 4, 5 etc and not 1, 10, 100, 11, 110, 111, 12, etc. What a disappointment to bump into that bug in iPhoto! I hope there is a solution. Please advise!
Thanks everyone in advance.

That's been an issue with several apps for a while. You can batch rename the titles in iPhoto using the Photos ➙ Batch Change ➙ Title to Text menu option with the check box checked to add a sequential number to each photo.
Click to view full size
You can always revert back to the original file name using the same menu option.
OT

Thunar wrong sort order

Today after installing arch on my laptop i noticed that the sort order of my files and folders in thunar are wrong. I made a little test folder:
The order of the folders in the test folder don't change when I change the sort order but in other folders the sort order is reversed but the folders and files are not sorted.
Has someone the same Problem or a fix for it?

BrainWorker wrote:
AaronBP wrote:They notice because they are in the CC list. Whenever a new comment comes in they get an email. You should not open a new bug if there's already one open about it.
I don't really care if they are going to complain about it or not. My goal is to make them pay attention to this bug, because I think it is nicely forgotten.
This is open source, bro. You can't make anybody do anything, but you might encourage some admin to ban you if you willfully break rules. If you can't break open the source and fix the problem yourself (which is surely the most speedy solution!), you're better off following community procedures and being as helpful as possible. Otherwise you'll just be excluded and ignored.

Wrong sorting of non-English characters (iTunes 11.2)

Since version 11.2 of iTunes, there is a problem with sorting of names with non-English characters (such as ž, š, č, ř or other in Czech). It seems that iTunes completely omits these characters when sorting. As an example, I have Čajkovskij (which is the Czech spelling of Tchaikovsky) among artists in my library and it is currently sorted between Adele and Alan Parsons Project, i.e. it seems that the character Č has been completely omitted while sorting and thus the artist is sorted as Ajkovskij.
All my ID3 tags are of version 2.3 and in Unicode, thus this should not be any encoding problem. I even tried to change the ID3 tags to version 2.4, i.e. UTF-8, and it did not help.
I think that there must be many more people experiencing this problem. Not everyone has only English or ASCII names in the library and I am surprised that I could not find anything on this bug anywhere on the net yet.
Thanks for any help on this.

Looks like a bug in the latest build. See this recent thread.
You could report the problem via iTunes Feedback or sign up for a free Apple Developer Connection account and make use of Apple Bug Reporter.
tt2

A simple question about wrong sorting with multiple sort columns in Excel 2010

Hi, everyone! I have encountered a problem that I don't know how to explain.
So I post it here because I don't know if there is another more relevant forum...
I have a data sheet with the students' scores for the course.
All the data were generated with the randbetween function,
and pasted with the values.
To rank the students by their performance,
I did the sort with the column "total score" as the first sort-column
and "final term" as the second.
The weird thing to me is that the order of the data seems problematic.
That is, all the rows are sorted correctly with the first sort-column.
But for the rows with the same values of the first sort-column,
there are some rows whose values of the second sort-column are out of order.
(please look at the data file at
www_dot_kuaipan_dot_cn/file/id_67204268108546068_dot_htm
Please change the "_dot_" to the real literal dot.
Especially the rows with 56.7 as the first sort-column value
and some other values near the tail of the list.)
I tried to manually input and sort the same values of both columns
in a near-by region. The result was correct.
When some friend copied all the data to paste in Notepad,
and reload them in excel. The problem disappears.
Some friend also tried to wrap a round function at the values of the 1st sort-column,
the sorting order became correct!
But they could not explain why either.
How confusing! I even tried to swap the first and secod sort-column;
the output was right.
All the data were generated by randbetween function and pasted with values.
Where could all the special characters, if any, come?
Can anyone give me an explanation? I would be very grateful.
Thanks in advance!

Re: Sort is not in proper order
Sounds as if the data includes spaces or hidden characters that are affecting the sort.
That is indicated by the fact that manually entering the data resolves the problem.
Note: You can use a public file storage website to hold your file and add the link to it in your post.
Jim Cone
Portland, Oregon USA
Special Sort excel add-in (30+ ways to sort) - 3 week no obligation trial
https://jumpshare.com/b/O5FC6LaBQ6U3UPXjOmX2

Wrong sort order

iPhoto recently began reordering photos on its own. This started about the time I moved my library of photos from my old G5 to my new MacPro Quad Core. I have View/Sort Photos/ set to Manually for one of my albums and I've been adding photos to the end, the bottom of the album in thumbnail view once they've been imported. The next time I open iPhoto those and others added recently are at the top of the page, at the beginning of the thumbnails.
I'm thinking that whatever file it is that keeps track of the sort order may be corrupted. Does that sound right? Any ideas on how to fix this problem?
Thanks.

Thank you.
Actually there is no such exact option. There is a Repair the Database option, and one marked Rebuild the Database from the automatic backup. they are two separate options. Since I wasn't sure of the health of the automatic backup I selected Repair the Database. I've quite and restarted iPhoto a couple times. The first time I had to reorder one of the recently added photos. After that things seemed OK. I'll consider the problem solved, at least for now.
Thank you so much!

Wrong sort order for Photos taken in rapid sequence

Hi!
I have a number of Photos that are taken on the same second. These show up in what appear to be random order in the organizer. Is there any workaround for this, let´s say by first sorting on timestamp and then by file name (if timestamp is equal).
This must be a common problem with todays cameras taking a lot of photos in rapid sequence, but just timestaming them with a resolution of one second.
Please help!
Cheers!
/ Håkan

Thanks for the proposal, and yes, I could fix the problem in a number of ways, for instance by changing the timestamp of the pictures.
But as I see it, PSE 7 should have a built in feature for handling this issue. Frankly, handling this automatically should be one of the most basic features of the organiser. Any modern digital camera have the possibility to take several shots per second.
Please Adobe, fix this !

Wrong sorting of tasks by calendars

Hello,
Since i've synced from OmniFocus to iCal and created more calendars, the tasks from my new calendars (which were inserted in the structure of my calendars) are not sorted correctly as my tasks from late calendars are listed below the other calendars.
It is very chaotic to me as i can't fix the trouble: i've cleared plist files, caches, the calendars itselves (backuped first and then restored) but nothing seems to be working.
Can anybody explain to me this bug(?) ?

No one can help.

Phone shows duplicate and wrongly sorted contact e...

Have synched my 6303 Classic with my contacts in Outlook 2003 SP3 on XP
Nokia communication centre (from PC suite 7.1.30.9) looks perfect - my contact list is fine and sorted by first name, last name
Unfortunately my phone is sorted last name, first name and (worse) is showing double entries thus
Bloggs, Fred and
Bloggs; Fred/M
Can I change this on the phone?
P.S. I use subfolders within my Outlook contacts, and also copy the contents up to the top level as I also have a Palm which only looks at the top level. I had assumed this was the cause of the duplicate entries on my phone, but if this is the case how come communication centre gets it right?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi tolgan,
Atleast in S60 5th edition phones have the following options
In phone Contacts > Options > Settings > Contact to display
1) Phone memory
2) SIM memory
3) Service numbers
Check boxed will be there in front of all these options, you can select/deselect. If you select both phone and sim memory, and if the same contacts are present on both these memories, it will duplicated on the Contacts of the phone, but an icon will be displayed before those contacts on the phone to show SIM contact/phone contact. If its a sim contact, an icon of SIM will be displayed before that SIM contact.
One way is to cumulate all those contacts either in Phone memory or in SIM memory and select only the required option where all the contacts are stored, its one time manual work but it will avoid some confusions. Once you cumulate all the contacts in SIM memory, it would suggest you to copy those contacts to phone memory and select phone memory as your primary contact, so that those contacts can be backup-ed while backuping your phone using Content copier of Nokia PC Suite/Nokia OVI SUite, because as of now, Content copier will backup only phone memory alone, it wont backup SIM memory contacts.

Wrong sort date when importing .mbox

hi, i hve just converted my .pst files to .mbox, after importing my inbox to entourage and sorting these according to the "received" date all emails only sort according to todays import date and time only....(the email still shows the original sent/received date)
how can the emails be sorted according their correct date and NOT according to import time? help appreciated.

Why is knowing that important during the edit?
Yes, FCP only shows the date imported" date metadata. Future updates of FCP X I assume will add more metadata support, such as Creation Date and Modification Date, since metadata is vital to FCP X and there are some metadata handling features that are on the way.

Wrong sorts after synchronisation of intelligent playlists

Hello
i have an intelligent playlist for my 5 Star rated songs. I sorted it in itunes 9 alphabetically but on the iphone (3.1) it is not in the correct order.
I havent had this trouble before i updated!!
Any ideas

Everyone who upgraded to iTunes 9 seems to be experiencing this inability to sort playlists on the iPhone. There are many other threads discussing this, e.g.:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2151606
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2153447
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2152353
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2154747
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2160489
Please report this bug to Apple at:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html
http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

New Date() -- getYear() & getMonth() return strange/wrong values

Hi,
I am writing this Javascript under a text field initialize event of Livecycle:
var date = new Date();
xfa.host.messageBox("year "+date.getYear(),"Message",3);
xfa.host.messageBox("month "+date.getMonth(),"Message",3);
I get "113" for the first messageBox and "5" for the second.
Shouldn't they be 13 (or 2013) and 6 as we are in June 2013 now??
Thanks

Apparently solved, sorry for rush-asking the forum. I am using date.getFullYear() to have 2013 and I found that months are 0-indexed. Therefore, January is 0.
Thanks anyway

CSS strangeness / wrong tags used.

We've developed several websites and use a particular css file that is crafted slightly differently mostly to do things like use a different color. The css file has the same name in each site. The tags have the same name, etc.
Since upgrading to 10.3.9 and Safari 1.3 I am seeing colors from site A used when I display site B.
This is easy to see.
(1) In a new window: http://pricetargetresearch.com/
(2) In another new window: http://iragent.com/
The navigation bar on IRagent is supposed to be green. To see this:
(3) Close the two windows
(4) Empty the Cache
(5) In a new window http://iragent.com/
(6) In another new window http://pricetargetresearch.com/
The navigation bar is now green on PriceTarget Research when it should be blue.
Clearly there is some type of scope issue, probably surrounding the ability of Safari to set a css file for the whole browser.
Anyone see this in Safari 2 and Tiger?

JLS,
You are experiencing the background image caching problem.
www2.harrisdirect.com/pre/login.htm has:
<td "/images/bg.gif" height="25" width="5"> </td>
while:
www.macminute.com has:
<table width="730" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bgcolor="#ffffff" "/images/bg.gif">
The rendering problem is inconsistent because it counts on the change that a css file and tag or background image filename is equivalent between two pages from different domains which are open simultaneously.
It is the nature of such bugs that they would be inconsistent.
I reported it immediately, but maybe I should report it again now that the situation is clearer thank to this discussion.
Regards,
Dave

Strange/wrong sorting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for