Strategy 70 PIRs Consumption problem

Dear All
I am using strategy 70 at my HALB, the problem is system is not reducing its PIRs when i make GI against its FERT Order reservation.
Please advice..
regards
Navaid

Dear Navaid,
Thanks for feed back and nice to hear that your issue is resolved
I guess based on your below thread you have tried option 40 and 70 stratagies and it worked
[Planning Strategy;
Since issue is resolved close the threads
Good Luck !
Regards
Madhu

Similar Messages

PIR Consumption - Sales Order & Service Order

All -
I've come across an issue in our system as it relates to PIR consumption. We create a PIR forecast which is designed to be consumed by orders. (MM strategy group 40, PIR consumption indicator 1). PIR is successfully consumed upon sales order creation.
In the same area of our business (aftermarket service and repair), we also require PIR consumption when component requirements are added to our repair service orders.
With the current setup (strat 40, CI 1), the PIR is not consumed after service order component addition. It adds to the total material requirements.
I've altered our settings across the board to account for both order types, however, i am hitting a wall as to if my new settings are a help or a hinderance.
New settings are (MM strat 40, MM mixed MRP mode 3, PIR CI 3).
Visually, i can see that my total PIR count is actively reduced via MD04 monitoring, however, when looking at the PIR directly, I see that the PIRs have not been consumed. Instead they are still active and the reqs are hidden.
I don't know if consumption of PIR is allowed for multiple order types. I know that strat 40 directly relates to sales order requirement planning. I do not know if there is a strategy that works similarly for both sales order AND service order types. I'm also very skeptical of using mixed MRP mode 3 to accomplish the PIR consumption.
Could anyone enlighten me on this? I can't find any information on this sort of order types with consumption. If it's not possible to combine order types with PIR consumption, so be it. I'd just like some info.
Thank you in advance,
Ehren

Sure thing. I'm running in our test client for the results, but my settings are identical:
Image 1 = MD04 result of addition of PIR using VSF with consumption indicator 3:
Image 2 = Addition of sales order requirement for the same part, VQTEST1. Successfully consumes qty 1 of PIR material:
Image 3 = Modification of service order to add qty 1 of component VQTEST1. Rather than consuming one of the remaining PIRs, the order created a new requirement above the PIR forecast:

Use of PIR consumption for advance material order (MTO prototype)

Hi planing Gurus,
I am investigating the possibility to use PIR to trigger replenishement long lead time sub level mfg or purchase products in the context of building MTO prototype. I believe I could use planning strategy 70/consumption mode VSFB to handle eventual actual requirements that will be created at higher levels.
Q1. The parameters Fwd and Bwd consumption in MRP 3 are limitted. For instance, if I set 7 days each the system will only consider actual demand in this timeframe. I am not too in favor to set large value there to manage the fact that actual demand may not occur exactly as planned by the PIR. Is there any way the consumption can be iterative (eg. bwd 7, fwd 7, bwd 14, fwd 14)?
Q2. Is there another mean to trigger replenishment of long lead time mfg part/purch part in the contexte of MTO prototype and manage consumption.
Your help is greatly appreciate and speed up my curve to learn SAP PP architecture (I have experience with other mfg systems).
Francois Paquet

You had another question
Q2. Is there another mean to trigger replenishment of long lead time mfg part/purch part in the contexte of MTO prototype and manage consumption.
FOr this I would suggest even looking at Planning strategy (PS) = 50.
This strategy are probably the most widely-used strategies in a make-to-order environment.
Procurement of the long lead items (components) is planned by means of planned independent requirements entered at the finished product level. The system creates special planned orders at the finished product level for these planned independent requirements. These orders are only relevant for production once a sales order for the finished product exists.
The assemblies are, however, produced or procured before the sales order is entered. Production is carried out up to one level before the finished product level, and the assemblies and components required for producing the finished product are placed in stock to await the incoming sales order.
Final assembly is triggered once a sales order has been entered.
Hope this helps you take a good decision.
Thanks,
Ram

Consumption problem under strategy 40

Hi,
I have 5 VSF for the material with strategy 40, e.g.
2007/03/01 l00 pcs   not consumed
2007/04/01 l00 pcs   not consumed
2007/05/01 l00 pcs   --> consumed form here
2007/06/01 l00 pcs
2007/07/01 l00 pcs
and the consumption mode was set as Backward/Foreward 100/20, but sometimes the system consume the VSF in recent days firstinstead the VSF
in the past. Is there anything wrong?
Thanks and best regards.

Hi,
Thank you very much for your answer, and I have a question is,
how it happened? I mean, why the oldest PIRs are consumed at last?
Thanks and best regards.

PIR consumption issue

We have been having intermittent problems with our R/3 implementation (4.7C)for a long time. PIRs get consumed without explanation (i.e. no sales orders coming it to consume the forecast, which is expressed as PIRs). We suspect it might have something to do with our delivery process, but have been unable to pinpoint it, or re-create it for showing SAP, or anyone else. Has anybody out there experienced something similar? We're at the end of our rope!

I am sorry for the very late reply Senthil.
Yes PIR is basically a requirement that is created manually ( t code :MD64) on the manufacturing plant. This enables the manufacturing plant to produce materials to stock ahead of actual customer requiremnts( the sale order).
The advantage of consumption mode is that it prevents dual planning. To better explain if the sale order is created when actual customer order is received it will first consume the PIR requirement as stocks have been produced ahead of time
(made to stock strategy) against the PIR. If the sale order qty is over & above the PIR reqt then only system will plan for additional qty to meet the remaining sale order qty.
For your case
Lets assume unconsumed PIR for last month was 10. This month PIR is 20.
now sale order comes this month for 10. It will consume the PIR of this month & not consume PIR of last month as your backward consumption is only 5 days. Then your earlier month PIR remains unconsumed & will cause excess planning.
Lets assume another sale order comes for 20. System will consume the remaining PIR (of this month) =10 & replan for additional 10 to meet actual Sale order.
So my advise for consumption periods is backward =30, forward = 30 or 60 days if you create PIR monthly. If your PIR is for weekly or daily buckets then consumption periods as per your selection should work well.
Lastly enusure that unconsumed PIR reorganisation run is carried out to avoid excess planning( tocde: MD74)
Hope this helps you. If you have further doubts please send me an email on [email protected]
Thanks,
Shenoy

PIR consumption at different plant

Hello dear gurus,
Here's a tough one; I have a situation (quite common) where there's a supply chain with one manufacturing plant and a number (like 4) of distribution plants. (CPG)
Normaly in SAP in such a situation you need to maintain PIRs for each distribution plant (there's where sales take place), and with special procurement key relate the supply to the manufacturing plant.
Thing is that in my case customer is not willing to maintain PIRs for each DC, but rather have one global forecast (at manufacturing plant level). To accomodate that I made a development that reflects the available stocks in DCs as supply elements in MFG. plant, so we can run one MRP planning run to get production planning.
My yet unsolved problem is the incorrect consumption of PIRs. I use strategy 10.
Ideally was if I found a way to consume planning in the MFG plant with sales in the DCs.
Any ideas?

Dear,
If you are maintaining the PIR in manufactering plant system will take the stock of manufactering plant.
Requirement will flow from DC to manufactering plant, In this case you maintain the requirement from in the form of PR from DC, how the system will understand the requirement from DC.
Hence correct and stright forward way is you need to maintai n stg 40 in C and maintain special stock indicator. Hence system will create PR after considering the stock at DC.
If this is not the case, you need to go for ZMRP.
Please come back your view is different and looking for some thing different

FM : For reduction of PIR /Consumption

Hi.
Is there any FM for reduction of PIR <Forecast> quantity for consumption mode forward/backward> .

Hi ALL experts,
I can send my screenshot to you guys, but I cannot upload them via picasaweb.
Is there any chance that SAP made some "upgrade" and make it happen by using "consumption 3+Mix MRP 1".
I use a customized strategy and I compare it with 40, here is the defferences:
                 Reqmts type (indep./customer)    Reqmts class (indep./customer)
40                        VSF/KSV                                       101/050
ZZ                      VSFB/KSV                                      105/050
default values for consumption type per reqmts class, VSF(101) is 1; VSFB(105) is 3.
Thank you.
BR!
ROCVEL

REM PIR consumption.

Hi Gurus,
Previously material has strategy 10,now i changed to 40 but the PIRs are not consuming by incoming orders.
In other plant materials having strategy 40 working fine,the same i wanted to do in different plant (in which strategy is 10)thats why i made changes from strategy10 to40.But it dosent works i.e. PIRs are not consuming by incoming orders.
Pls help
Regards,
-Deven

Hi Deven.
check in "Requirement Class, Tcode : OVZG, The "Transfer of Requirement should " (Rq) should be clicked (on). Also check the Allocation Indicator (Allln).
The Allocation Indicator Controls the consumption of customer requirements with planned independent requirements whereby the customer requirements type is only allocated one consumption st
Also check in Requirement Class, whether the Right Requirement has been Assigned to Requirement class. Tcode : OVZH.
If solved, reward point & close the Thread.
Regards,
Nayeem Ahamed

N660 TF 2GD5 - PerfCap/GPU load/Power consumption problem

Hello,
at first, sorry for my english, I will try to do my best.
I have problem with my GPU when I play Battlefield 4. Problem occours with newest Nvidia drivers, also with beta and older drivers.
Problem is that I have huge FPS drops periodically, coming maybe every 5 minutes for 15-20 seconds, for example in BF4 it means FPS drops from 50fps to 15fps, really annoying.
It does not matter at scene complexity, it´s the same in huge battles as when I am alone looking up to the sky.
I was searching why is this happening and GPU-Z helped me to indentify PrefCap, and immediately GPU load + Power consumption going down from 100% to 40-50%
I have a screenshot, but can´t findout how connect attachment (external links are not allowed).
Could somebody explain me what is the problem and why is this happening? I am thinking about to sell my MSI graphics card and buy another one because of this, I don´t want any throtling problems because of compatibility or whatever
Is there any way how to turn it off or disable? Register, something.
Thank you

you seems to be right guys.
I undervoltaged my CPU by -0.1V, lovered Frequency to 3600MHz and problem is gone.
So, time for new PSU

Requirement strategy : PIR reduction with Production Order GR

Hello,
I'd like to manage in APO a requirement strategy reduced by Goods receipts of production order.
I'v tried to manage a specific strategy but I don't know wich Category Group setted in the customizing.
Could you help to:
- first confirm that we could reduce the PIR with GR from a production order?
- Then which category or category group should I select ?
thank you for your help
Renaud

Hi Renaud,
Below you have the strategies that are supported by APO. For your requirement you have to create a new strategy in APO that support your needs. The steps are described in my first replay. I don't think that you will find exactly the same logic that you have in ECC but something similar yes. In APO we can't do moving type!
For example you can modify strategy 10 and change the category group to FP1 (production fixed). So, it's clear that you will have in stock the quantity of the confirmed pl.order!
Thanks, Marius

Restricting PIR consumption based on custom Order Type

Hello Experts,
We have implemented BADI MD_PIR_FLEX_CONS in our system ( Version 4.7 )so that we can restrict the consumption of Order Reservations.
For this we have added code as per OSS Notes# 608760 and 127370 for the BADI Interface.
We have included MRP Element "AR" so that consumption can happen for the order reservations.
The BADI is restricting consumption of PIR now for the order reservations, but now we want to restrict the Consumption of independent requirement only against reservation generated by customized Order type ( Say ZXXX ).
Does this functionality exist for this BADI? If yes,then how can we implement this?
Regards,
Debasish Sahu

Hello Prakash,
Thanks for your response.
The Def. Documentation does not describe how the process is carried out.
The documentation is as follows:
Application component: PP-MRP, PP-MP-DEM, PP-MP-LTP
Function group: M60A, M61X
You can use Business Add-In (BAdI) MD_PIR_FLEX_CONS to make the consumption and reduction processes for planned independent requirements more flexible.
In the SAP R/3 standard system there were previously four possibilities for consumption and reduction of planned independent requirements (planned independent requirements consumption indicator):
SPACE     no consumption
'1'     Consumption with customer requirements (planned independent requirements)
'2'     Consumption with dependent requirements, dependent and manual reservations, release order requirements from stock transfers (dependent requirements)
'3'     Consumption with planned independent requirements and dependent requirements
You can use Business Add-In MD_PIR_FLEX_CONS to realize consumption processes in which there are controls to define for each MRP element whether consumption or reduction should occur.
This Business Add-In replaces modification note 127370 in release 4.70.
&PRECONDITIONS&
&STANDARD_SETUP&
o     The Business Add-In is not active in the standard system.
o     The system cannot be used multiple times.
&ACTIVITY&
INCLUDE MD03_BADI_MRP OBJECT DOKU ID TX LANGUAGE EN
INCLUDE MD03_BADI_IMPLEMENT OBJECT DOKU ID TX LANGUAGE EN
&EXAMPLE&
In the sample-coding, planned independent requirements with consumption indicator '4' (see method documentation) are consumed against all of the consumable SD document types (sales orders, SD scheduling agreement schedule lines, deliveries) and release order requirements from stock transfer purchase procurement proposals (purchase orders, purchase requisitions, scheduling agreement schedule lines, planned orders).
&ADDITIONAL_HINTS&
<DS:IO.IF_EX_MD_PIR_FLEX_CONS        CHECK_PIR_CONS_REDUC> Documentation on BAdI method CHECK_PIR_CONS_REDUC
There is no details on the manner in which we implement this functionality.
Please let me know if this is of some help.
Thanks,
Debasish

PIR consumption

Please suggest me with effective planning.
I have a FG "A" having phantom A_PHAN which has a component "B" (planning strategy 70). when i plan for B, lets say i entered 600 qty in a planning table for 12/2010. now i got a sales order with 2 schedules line item for same material A with delivery dates as 10.12.2010, 15.12.2010, when i ran MRP before sales order i got a planned order for qty 600 on 1.12.2010, after SO when i re ran MRP i got 2 planned orders, 1 for qty 100 on 1.12.2010, second one for qty 500 (200+300, 2 dependent requirements of A) on 10.12.2010. what should i do to get one planned order with 600 qty and rest are as dependent requirements of 200 and 300.
when i used PS 40 it will generating 3 planned orders one with 100 qty others 2 with 200 and 300 respectively. what strategy di i need to use for component "B". is there anything to do with consumption periods lengths.
if i have multiple similar components (d,e, f) can i put them in phantom assembly A_PHAN, can i plan for A_PHAN for 600 qty for 12.2010 will they transfer to all components, in that case what strategy do i need to use.
Thanks in advance.

7,
For your component part, you are saying that you have two requirements, each of which is on a different day, you have no stock, and you want MRP to create only one planned order which will 'cover' both of the requirements..
The creation of planned orders is dependent upon the Lot sizing procedure. I will assume you are using EX lot size in the Material Master of your component. If you wish to consolidate planned orders, you probably want to use a "Period Procedure" based lot size, such as "weekly" (WB), Monthly (MB), or a custom built Period procedure lot size. You can create new lot size strategies in OMI4.
Best Regards,
DB49

BOM Consumption problem.

HI !
Pls help me on below issue. We are using SAP AFS System.
Make to Stock scenario, problem with BOM.
BOM Created with Two different type of raw materials, one material consumption showing correctly and another material consumption showing error.
fiished mateial required qty is 500.
1st raw material Stock requirment showing 200 mtrs. ( 2mtrs required for 1 pc of final product)
2nd raw mateial Stock requirment showing 490 pc's. (1 pcs required for 1 pc of final product). as per BOM it should give 500 pcs's.
Thanks in advance.

OK, i will give some more information on issue.
final product required qty is 500 pc's Shirts.
BOM - 1 pc shirt = 2 mtrs Fabric + 1 pc Sticker + 1 Pc label + 1 pc silk lablel + 10 pc's Buttons.
for 500 pc's shirts, required materials are as below as per BOM.
1. 100 mtrs Fabric,.
2. 500 pcs Labels.
3. 500 pcs silk lables.
4. 5000 pcs Buttons.
But System showing only below quantities.
1. 100 mtrs Fabric.
2. 400 pcs Labels.
3. 400 pcs silk lables.
4. 4000 pcs Buttons.
what could be the reason where its going wrong. item one is fabric material, for this system giving correct qty. item 2,3,4 is trim material system giving wrong qty for this materials only.
Thanks in advance.

HOWTO Workaround Power Consumption Problem w/ Garm...

Preface
After suffering from low standby battery life for quire a while (less than 24h on E51) I have figured out that the problem comes from a background service installed by Garmin Mobile XT. I have made a few measurements w/ Nokia Energy Profiler and the difference between having Garmin installed or not is 3 fold. That is 0.05W average standby power consumption w/o Garmin installed and 0.16W average standby power consumption w/ Garmin installed, everything else the same.
The Problem
Garmin Mobile XT installs a small service w/ unknown to me purpose which sucks the extra .10W of power even w/o Garmin started. There is an option to Enable/Disable this service in Garmin Mobile XT's configuration menu which is Disabled by default. The problem is that even that the default setting is Disabled, the service still runs once Garmin is installed.
The Workaround
Until Garmin fixes this bug you can disable the background service by following these steps:
0. Install Garmin Mobile XT on your handset if you haven't done so.
1. Start Garmin Mobile XT.
2. Select "Tools" from the three buttons on the right.
3. Select "Settings".
4. Select "System".
5. Scroll down and set "Launch background service" to "Enabled".
6. Exit Garmin Mobile XT.
7. Repeat steps 1 - 5 but this time set "Launch background service" to "Disabled".
8. Reboot your handset.
Done
Result
Now the background service will be *truly* disabled and your standby battery life should return to normal.

Thanks for your suggestions, but i was finally able to figure it out myself. linux-lts was unfortunately no option for me, as i want to use bumblebee. But the direction, this pointed me to was good. It seems one of the kernel updates broke my bumblebee package, so the power management didnt work and the card was constantly powered on. This was nothing new, but my powertop completely messed it up, by adding this additional power consumption to eth0. Funny enough, this power consumption even disappeared, when i unloaded eth0. After deleting powertops saved results and recalibrating it, it now shows up all components power usage correctly.
Thus i mark this thread as SOLVED.

CPU Consumption Problem?

Hello all,
I have a 13-inch mb aluminum with snow leopard 10.6 and had a question with a problem that I've been having recently. After doing some searching, I couldn't find anyone with the same problem.
So basically, what happens is that my computer will be working perfectly fine and the cpu will be idling at 1-3% capacity, which is what it's supposed to do when you're only checking websites/doing word processing ect. Then all of the sudden, my CPU % usage jumps to 50-60% capacity and my laptop starts getting really hot (I have smcfancontrol and it says it's 78C degrees and the fan's speed is 7000rpm). I then proceed to the activity monitor to see what program(s) are sucking the CPU power, but to no avail. All of the processes that are showing aren't taking any more than 4-5% CPU power combined. What gives? This has happened to me twice already in the past 4 days, so I feel that it'll happen again.
The quick fix is restarting my computer... But I was wondering if there's a more serious problem? Has anybody else experienced this? If so, how did you fix it? I appreciate all of your feedback. Thank you in advance!

Thank you for your help all! I do have a brother 2170w and did notice the other day that it wasn't working (the wireless part) and had to print elsewhere. So I guess snow leopard is to blame? It all makes sense now, because yeah, I did try to print something after upgrading to snow leopard to no avail.
Jay,
I did download and install the new drivers, so hopefully it'll work. I wasn't however, able to find the previous drivers while doing a search in finder (I tried brother, br, and other variations). I just downloaded the new ones and installed it... Think it'll be a problem? Computer's working fine now.

Strategy 70 PIRs Consumption problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for