Structure articles Price determination

Hi Folks,
I am new to SAP Retail. Can anyone tell me how the purchase price and sales price of the Structured articles in SAP Retail are determined.
My Doubts are as follows,
1. Since we are including components for structured articles (Prepack,Sales Set) do we need to maintain purchase view in Structured article master record. If not how the Purchase price is picked and what r the settings need to be maintained.
Please clarify me on this issue.....
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Madhan Raj. C

Hi
When a document is saved and you try to display the conditions , the data is fetched directly from database . At this point of time there is no condition access made and that is the reasn why you dont see pricing analysis available.
The pricing analysis data is determined runtime and not stored when the document is saved .
When you press update button , then Repricing is triggered and you will see pricing analysis when you click "Access button".
Regards
Me

Similar Messages

Custom defined FM for purchase price determination

Hi all,
can anybody help me with the problem below..
In IS-retail im assigning a custom defined function module for purchase price determination (MM42 -> sales view -> PP det. seq - 06).
example FM for which is WV_EXAMPLE_01.
but in the import parameter (structure KALP) im not getting the vendor number eventhough it is specified in the screen..
I need vendor number along with material(which im getting) to calculate purchase price..
Can anyone tell me wat the problem is and a solution for it.
Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
In VKP5 calculation,Purchase price Schema is pulled from Purchase price determination sequence.
In PP Determination sequence we can give PP schema based on PP determination type.
If the PP type is A,system will fetch the PP Schema from Standard schema maintained in MM.
Regards,
Krish

Price control V and price determination 3

In the material master record 'price control is given as V and price determination indicator as 3 . With this combination , in the sale order pricing, which price would be picked up by VPRS condition ? Material ledger is activated for this material .
Regards
Mahesh .

hi,
For Make to order scenerio, the price of finished goods will be Standard price ' s'. for Raw material it will be Moving average price"v".
For VPRS condition it will take Standard price of product.
if ur using with Quantity structure, then the price of Raw material in BOM and routing will be shown in ck11n.
Better to take EK02 Condition in pricing procedure with maitaining Requirement class and type.
It will automatically show the price of finished product when u click on cost calculation tab in sales order.
Regards,
Sreekanth Munipally

Condition Types in Price Determination Process

Hi
Can any one explain me about in Detail about the VARIOUS TABS that work in the CONDITION TYPE of PRICE DETERMINATION PROCESS
Thanks & Regards,
Senmani.

hi
hi
control data 1 :
Condition Class is a grouping that lets you control each condition type differently.
For example, the condition type "taxes" defines that the taxes in a document must be recalculated if the country of the ship-to party changes.
Condition category (examples: tax, freight, price, cost)
A classification of conditions according to pre-defined categories (for example, all conditions that relate to freight costs).
Condition category basically identifies the type pf cost the Condition type is being used for & can be used for .
Calculation type
Determines how the system calculates prices, discounts, or surcharges in a condition. For example, the system can calculate a price as a fixed amount or as a percentage based on quantity, volume, or weight.
The calculation type can be set when generating new condition records. If this does not happen, the calculation type maintained here is valid for the condition record
Rounding rule
The rule that determines how the system rounds off condition values during pricing. The last digit will be rounded.
Example
In the standard rounding rule '_', values are rounded off according to business standards:
10.454 -> 10.45 DEM
10.455 -> 10.46 DEM
In rounding rule 'A', values are always rounded up:
10.459 -> 10.46 DEM
10.451 -> 10.46 DEM
In rounding rule 'B', values are always rounded down:
1045.9 -> 1045 LIT
1045.1 -> 1045 LIT
In this example, the currency of the condition rate is Italian Lira. The Italian Lira does not have any places after the point.
Structure condition
controls whether the condition type should be a duplicated condition or a cumulated condition.
This control is only helpful when you use bill of materials or configurable materials.
Aduplicated condition is duplicated into all assigned items.
A cumulated condition contains the net value of all assigned items.
control data 2 :
promotions
Specifies that the condition type in question is only valid for Promotions.
Use
Conditions for which this indicator has been set can only be maintained via the 'Promotion' menu - not via the Purchasing menu.
Accrual (e.g. Freight)
Indicates that the system posts the amounts resulting from this condition to financial accounting as accruals.
Use
If you mark this indicator, the condition appears in the document as a statistical condition.
Before Release 4.0 variant conditions (VA00) had to be created with the condition category 'O'
Problem: It was not possible to indicate a 'Variant condition' at the same time as 'Internal costing condition' and 'Freight'.
Solution: For this reason more indicators are being set up in 4.0 for the condition type:
'Variant condition' (KVARC)
'Internal costing condition' (KFKIV)
The characteristic values O and I for the condition category must no longer be used.
For more information, see the note 93426.
inv.list condi
Condition for invoice list
Marks the condition type as relevant for internal costing.
Quantity conversion
This field controls the quantity conversion during determination of the condition basis.
The field is only relevant for calculation rule 'C' (quantity- dependent.
It is relevant if the sales quantity unit and the condition quantity unit are identical (and is different to the basis quantity unit).
Deactivated: The condition basis quantity is converted via the quantity to the stockkeeping unit. This means that the condition quantity is determined for planned factors. This means that a change to the conversion factors in the delivery or the order are not taken into account.
Rounding errors can occur during quantity conversion.
Activated: If the sales quantity unit and the condition quantity unit are identical, the quantity of the document item is used, i.e. the actual quantity.
Condition for inter-company billing
Conditions for Internal Costing, for example PI01 and PI01 were defined before Release 4.0 by KNTYP = I (Price for internal costing).
Problem: It was not possible to indicate 'Freight condition' at the same time as 'Internal costing condition' and 'Variant condition'.
Solution: Therefore a new indicator 'Internal costing condition' (KFKIV) has been set up. You can use this to indicate a freight condition as an internal costing condition. For more information, see note 93426.
Scale :
Scale basis indicator
Determines how the system interprets a pricing scale in a condition. For example, the scale can be based on quantity, weight, or volume
Checking rule for scale rates
Indicates whether the scale rates must be entered in ascending or descending order.
Scale Type
Indicator that controls the validity of the scale value or percentage:
From a certain quantity or value (base scale)
Up to a certain quantity or value (to-scale)
Alternatively, it is possible to work with interval scales. Interval scales must be stored in the condition type, that is, the scale type "interval scale" cannot be changed in the condition record. The reason for this is technical restrictions resulting from the programming within pricing.
Formula for scale base value
Formula for determining the scale base value.
Use
You can use this formula to specify calculation methods that are not provided in the standard system.
reward points if helpful
thanks and regards
ravikant dewangan

No structure could be determined for internal activity

Hi,
When i do the cost estimates (CK11n) for a Finished good, i get the error 'No structure could be determined for internal activity XYZ (Cost Center: ABC)'.
I have maintained prices for the activity & cost center combination in KP26.
Is there any other place i need to check?
Please advise.
Thanks in Advance,
Safi

Hi,
You need to check if the activity rates are maintained for the Cost center and Activities combination in KP26.
While running the cost estimates (CK11n) go to the itemization view (F6) and verify that the activity costs for the material are Not zero (This would be now Zero for the cost center and activity combination-when error is displayed).
Thanks,
Safi

Error CK 694 No structure could be determined for internal activity

Hi everybody
When I do confirmation, I have an error like this: CK 694 No structure could be determined for internal activity
In KP26, I defined plan price for Exactly Cost center and activity, Price indication is 3.
In costing variance
In OPL1, Actual Cost for Activity I choose 1. Plan Price...
In OKTZ, I define Cost Element in Cost Component Structure
I don't use Activity Group.
I don't know how to fix this error. Does anybody help me ? Please
Thanks.
QuangDD

Dear,
CK11N check the cost component structure for this material
Check whether secondary cost element is assined to that activity.If it is assigned then check cost component structure in IMG where that secondary cost element is assigned or not.
Please refer this thread also,
PRODUCT COSTING ERROR -CK11N
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

MIGO : Price determination

Hi all,
I got a problem when I try to do the good receipt for a purchse order in MIGO. SAP occures an error :
"Transaction cannot be posted due to errors in price determination
[X]Error during maint. of delivery costs in master conditions
Delivery cost conditions in different validity periods not identical "
What does it mean ? Where can I find the place where those validity periods are customized ?
I've already checked in the RFQ, and the period value of the delivery cost condition seems to be OK for all the costs...
Someone got another idea ?
Thanks all !

Hi Prasad,
Indeed this PO already has a GR, but this GR was cancelled.
Now when we try to do again the GR, we get that error.
But I check the PO and the delivery costs are still here. If I erase the delivery cost from the PO, I can do the GR. If I put back manually the delivery costs, I get the error during the GR.
So, do you have a solution ?
Thanks,
Mathieu

Price determination date control in Scheduling agreement (ME33)

<<Do not ask for or offer points>>
Dear SAP chams,
I have one doubt at the time of scheduling agreement creation. I am creating scheduling agreement trough t'code ME33. In the same, Select line item, go to item data, go to Additional data. Here the field Pr. Date Cat (Price Determination (Pricing) Date Control) contains the value "5" (i.e. GR date). I want to change this value. How can i change this determination ??...
Helpful answers will surely be awarded by points.
Thanks and regard,
Tarpan Vadaliya
Edited by: Matt on Feb 27, 2010 10:47 PM

Hi
Price determination category 5 cannot be change in scheduling agreement if your document type is time dependent. (See config spro>mm>purchasing>scheduling agreement>define document type. In that you will see a tick for time dependent condition)
If the config tick is removed then you can change price determination to any other option.
Regards
Antony

Issue with stock qty of component in Structured Articles in SAP BI

Dear Experts,
We are extracting stock in BI through SAP standard data source. We have used 2lis_03_bx and 2lis_03_bf data sources. We are facing issue with stock data validation due to structure articles (pre-pack) available in SAP source system.
We have stock of structure articles available at DC in source system. When we extract this information in BI, this article gets split into its components automatically. Due to which stock of components articles gets increased with huge amounts.
To analysis it in further detail, we have created below scenario:
Article Document Number: 4900000827
Article Number (Pre-pack): 300000082901
Article Number (Component): 300000082002
Stock of pre- pack article at this article document number: 174 pc
Stock of component article at this article document number: 348 pc (due to splitting of pre-pack article) + 151 (its own stock movement). Total stock for this article is 499. But actually total stock for this article should be 151 only.
As per our Business requirement, pre-pack article should not be split into its components. And stock in BI should be totally in sync with SAP stock.
I kindly request you to suggest the solution to rectify the same.
Thanks in advance.
--Vikas

Hi Vikas,
Check the OSS note L 1320386 - Frequently asked questions regarding BW Trade Foundation too.
Regards,
Rajesh

Price determination after historical simulation

I am confused about price determination after value at risk historical simulation run, my evaluation day is 2014.March.31, for commodity forward, the floating leg is based on price 42.17286 (the eighth shift for VaR calculation, my holding period is 10 days), which is shown in the attached picture, but my commodity price curve is showing 41.***,if I click "commodity price" under calcuation basis tab, it shows in March.31.2014, my commodity price is 41.57 USD. thus I will like to know how 42.17286 derived, is it from commodity price curve or commodity price? at which point of time? and the difference between commodity price curve and commodity price, if in March.26 , commodity price curve show 42.68, but commodity price shows 41.57, is it inconsistent?

hi,
it s really interesting issue!
this may not be the right solution but i ve tried and it worked right.
1-go to ME12 click the conditions tab on header line.
2-click the scales and click the details for scale type and choose "B" "last scale" for the scale type.
save and exit..
you ll be able to do PO-migo-and miro.
i hope it ll help.
regards.

Updating the Price Determination Field in the Material Master (MBEW-MLAST)

I'm doing a material conversion into an existing SAP system and the program to load the materials didn't load a value in the price determination field (MBEW-MLAST). Normally this field is required but because the conversion BAPI doesn't do as much validation as MM01 it was possible to create the record without a value. The field is not open to input when I use MM02, and even though it appears to work, when I do MM17 mass change the field is also not updated. Finally I tried transaction CKMM - Change Material Price Determination for Material Ledger but it required an entry in the Old Price Determination field and it won't let me enter blank.
We've since corrected the program but my problem is that I've converted about 5000 materials without a value in the field meaning the FI guys can't release cost estimates which is causing a bunch of problems for the testing that we want to do in this system. We've taken about 3 weeks to do this conversion so going back and doing it again is a terrible option. Does anybody know a way to get a value into this field other than what I've mentioned above (MM02, MM17, CKMM)?
Suggestions please.

have a look into OSS Note 1491364 - BAdI CKML_SET_VPRSV: Price determination cannot be changed

Override consignment price determination during goods issue process

Hi ALL,
My requirement is that User is asking want to override consignment price determination during
goods issue process. Is there any BADI/User Exit or Enhancement spot which can override the price value and in the
database level during Goods issue.
If yes provide me the enhancement details and where I can implement.
I will very thankful to you all if I get your valuable input.
Regards
Subhasis

Dear Laxman,
Check these links,
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/Batch+Determination
Automatic batch determination
Re: how to make the batch determination process automatic
Regards
Mangalraj.S

The Condition for service price determination incomplete

Dear experts,
I run the System with EC&O Best Practice. Howerver, I can not enter Services on tab Service of Sales Order: Short text of Service, Quantity, UOM, Gross Price. the error "Condition for service price determination incomplete" occours when I press Enter key.
Conditions for service price determination incomplete
Message no. SE477
Diagnosis
Either the calculation schema for services does not exist or the condition types have not been defined correctly.
Procedure
Please check your Customizing settings for service conditions.
If you have not yet defined any conditions for services, you can adopt the standard SAP settings from client 0.
Please help me check this issue on the attached file.
Thank you very much.
Thanks,
Binh Tran
<Personal details shared by OP is removed by Moderator. >
Message was edited by: Jyoti Prakash

Hi All,
Thank you very much for your inputs.
I checked all the notes, 25357, 27024 and 1383066. Everything is ok in the system. and these notes explained more on the MM part not on the SD- BOS. However, still i am not able to complete the Inquiry, same error exists.
This error is in SD not in MM, while i am creating the inquiry BOS.
If any one come across it and solved it, please let me know.
Regards,
Suresh

Price Determination (Pricing) Date Control - Purchase Order

Hi,
We are exploring the Price Determination (Pricing) Date Control in the Purchase Order.
Clientu2019s requiring is, correct me if it is a wrong requirement:
We have created Tax Codes:
C2 - CST 2% valid from 01.04.2010
C3 - CST 3% valid from 01.04.2010
We have created a purchase order with Tax Code C2 - CST 2% on 30.03.2010 as we are in doing back log entries. Since the tax code is valid from 01.04.2010 only , the purchase order is not displaying the Tax Code Value .
Now we are doing the Goods Receipt on 01.04.2010, the system will not pass the entry for the CST as at time of GR, the System picks up the Tax data from the Purchase Order.
Now we want that the System should pick up the Data at the Goods Receipt, not from the Purchase Order. Some one advised me to use put GR Date in Pr. Date Cat. Under Item-> Condition Control tab. We are able to view the Pr. Date Cat by changing the Screen Layout of ME21N.
We want to know what use of the same & under what condition is, we use this.
Our suggestion:
1. We are of the view that we should create the Tax Codes with Valid Date from 01.01.2010 (not from 01.04.2010 as currently maintained)
2. Or since we are doing the back log entry, we should create all the Open Purchase Orders dated 01.04.2010.
Is this the correct way which we are suggesting?
Please note that we are dealing with Excise Materials also?
Please guide.

Thanks for the reply,
While testing the same, I also encountered the somewhat same problem.
You are suggesting that we should change the Tax Code Valid From Date.
What do mean by the follwoing:
Pricing date category "GR date" can't be set in PO if price is entered manually (with condition type PBXX). This also means manually entered conditions at Po will not be used.
Regards,

NEW FIELDS FOR PRICE DETERMINATION in MM

Hi all experts,
we have added new field in customizing so that in the purchase order in MM we can use new fields for price determination.
However we do not finde the exit or program were we can set a value for these fields.
for instance, we want to differenciate countries belonging to the EU and not. We create a yes/no field and get its value from table T005 where each country has this info. Everything seems to be ok, but our field is not populated into KOM* tables and therefore we don't go through the condition price...
Any ideas? Thanks.

Hi,
You can try using Info Record.
Thanks,
Venkat

Structure articles Price determination

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for