Structure SI_BBSEG not found during upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0

Hi
We are upgradingour SAP system from 4.6c to ECC 6.0 and we are having an issue while generating the programs, error says '.INCLUDE SI_BBSEG ' not found. It seems like structure SI_BBSEG was not created by SAP'. How would i resolve this issue? i couldnt find any OSS note on this. Please advice.
thank you,
- A

Anil
SI_BBSEG is Include structure of BBSEG & comes already included in it as std SAP. (u can see it in SE11 >> BBSEG)
It does not exist till you want to enhance BBSEG & add your custom fields. Normally those fields will be added to Std SAP screens as custom enhancements . You can go to SE11 & double click; it will ask Do you want to create ?
What is the process you are following for moving Enhancements from 4.6 to ECC6 (user Exits, screen exits) ? If this SI_BBSEG exists in old system, then there must be std screen enhanced which uses the fields of this structure. There could be some programs too which are using this structure while creating FI Documents using std BAPI. recomended that these should move to ECC6 together.
If you have not enhanced BBSEG in 4.6 then refer note : 590977

Similar Messages

LONGPOST.LOG Errors during Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0

Dear all,
We have received the below errors during our upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
Basically we have received three types of errors:
1.
4PETG065 RSUPGDEC: Table/structure "BAPE_VBAK" (component "SD-SLS" ) enhanced illegally: Error "2"
2.
A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "/IRM/BADI_SDDOCFLOW" must still be migrated
A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZOTC218E_1" must still be migrated
A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZZ_MG_MASS_NEWSEG" must still be migrated A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZOTC218E_1" must still be migrated
A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZOTC218E_1" must still be migrated
3.
3PETG447 Table and runtime object "/SSF/DHEAD" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
3PETG447 Table and runtime object "/SSF/DTAB" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
3PETG447 Table and runtime object "/SSF/PTAB" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
Can anyone help us how to solve this issues.
Thanks & Regards
Senthil

Hi,
Senthil following are ans to ur questions
1. After the SPAU remediation is completed, should I manually release the transport or should I start the upgrade and the upgrade will release that transport?
Ans : Once your SPAU remediation is completed you should release the requests and then start the upgrade of the DEV system.
2. How do we import this SPDD & SPAU transport in the QA and PRD, I mean at what stage of the upgrade we need to specify/ include this transport?
Ans : Now when you start the QA or PRD upgrade at that time you come across a phase during PREPARE called ADJUSTPRP.
Refer following note for further information --
SAPNote 124522 - Importing a modification adjustment in 2nd upgrade
3. Suppose the QA & PRD has more objects to adjust than our Dev box, and this transport will not take care of the delta objects, so in that case how should we remediate, we need to create an other transport request in QA and then it will become two transports?
Ans : First of all this should not be the scenario where you have more modified objects than that in DEV. As all the modfications should take place in DEV first and then should be transported to QA and then PRD. But in such case what you can do is complete the upgrade of QA system and then you are still having 14 days to complete the SPAU objects. So you can make another request which can be transported as a post upgrade activity once the upgrade is completed in production. For SPDD you will have to take care of the SPDD objects if there are different than those in DEV during the ACT_700 phase only or else you might risk data.
This is the reason why SAP always asks you to follow a proper transport path.
4. If our dev box has more objects for remediation than our QA & PRD, then will these objects be also imported into the QA & PRD box?
Ans : Yes, thats why you should be very sure about the SPAU objects that you have found in DEV. You need to compare the objects with QA and PRD and then only make the modifications.
I hope i have answered all your queries.
Regards,
Suhas

Error during Upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

Hi All,
We are facing an error when upgrading from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We are facing this error on the table COEP - runtime object inconsistancy. What we found is there is ERP upgrade has created new extra fields in the table. In log file the error is specified as : Duplicate Field name, But we not able to find the duplicate field name in the table. Please kindly help as early as possible. The upgrade process is stuck.
Regards
Anil Kumar K

Hi Anil,
Is this issue fixed? Can i know how you fixed it?
replied to your message Re: How to adopt the index changes during upgrade.
Thanks,
Somar

Table Enhancement Category during upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0

When our sandbox was upgraded from 4.7 to ECC 6.0, Basis had the ABAP developers change the Enhancement Category on about 400 tables, some of which were custom tables. The enhancement category was previously u2018not classifiedu2019 on these tables.
Is this really necessary? Has anyone not changed the enhancement categories on tables that were flagged during the upgrade? Also, what happens if we select the wrong enhancement category?

Jane,
This is what SAP says,
Short Text
Enhancement Category Selection
Definition
Structures and tables that were defined by SAP in the ABAP Dictionary can be enhanced subsequently by customers using Customizing includes or append structures. The enhancements do not only refer to structures/ tables themselves, but also to dependent structures that adopt the enhancement as an include or referenced structure. Append structures that only take effect at the end of the original structure can also cause shifts - in the case of dependent structures - even within these structures.
You must select an enhancement category for the following reason: In programs where there is no active Unicode check, enhancements to tables and structures can cause syntax and runtime errors during type checks and particularly in combination with deep structures.
In programs where there is an active Unicode check, statements, operand checks, and accesses with an offset and length are problematic - for example, if numeric or deep components are inserted into a purely character-type structure and the structure thus loses its character- type nature.
Depending on the structure definition, the radio buttons allowed in the dialog box are ready for input. Choose one of the possible enhancement categories:
Cannot be enhanced
The structure must not be enhanced.
Can be enhanced or character type
All structure components and their enhancements must be character-type (C, N, D, or T). The original structure and all enhancements through Customizing includes or through append structures are subject to this limitation.
Can be enhanced or character-type or numeric
The structure and its enhancement must not contain any deep data types (tables, references, strings).
Can be enhanced in any way
The structure and its enhancement may contain components whose data type can be of any type.
Not classified
This category can be chosen, for example, for a transition status; however, it must not be chosen for creating structures.
The rules for defining the enhancement category result implicitly from the structure setup and the classification of the types used. These rules are as follows:
If the object contains at least one numeric type or a substructure or component (field has a structure/table/view as its type) that can be enhanced numerically, the object can no longer be enhanced character-type, but is itself, at most, enhanceable character-type or numeric.
If the object contains a deep component (string, reference, or table type), or it contains a substructure or component that is marked as enhanceable in any way, then the object itself is enhanceable in any way.
If the object does not contain any substructure or component that is marked as enhanceable, you can select cannot be enhanced. If the structure has not yet been enhanced, you can choose the category cannot be enhanced in any case.
If you are creating new tables and structures in the ABAP Dictionary, the system proposes the category can be enhanced in any way as standard value for the classification of the enhancement options. If the developer chooses a more restrictive classification than can be enhanced in any way for a particular structure, then only the classification levels that adhere to the rules above are allowed. It is not possible to choose an enhancement option of a structure that is more restrictive than the classification resulting immplicitly from the structure setup and from the classification of the types used. Therefore, only the allowed categories are proposed for selection in the maintenance user interface.
If a structure depends on one or several other structures, the smallest category is chosen as implicit classification (in the order cannot be enhanced < can be enhanced and character-type < can be enhanced and character-type or numeric < can be enhanced in any way). This classification is greater than or less than the category in the other structures and also greater than or the same as the category that results from the actual setup in the original structure itself.

CVERSEXPORT.OUT not found during upgrade

Hi,
In the extraction Phase of the upgrade (upgrade to NW7.01) we are getting the below error
"SEVERE ERROR: File CVERSEXPORT.OUT not found or empty."
Please advice.
Regards,
Cs

Hi,
The problem seems to be an issue with your downloaded files for the upgrade .
Please check you have downloaded all the export files for the upgrade succesfully . If not download
again and repeat the field .
Also mount the CD immediately after the Drive. Like H://Export .
Make sure that the file path is not too lengthy .
Regards,
Nibu

SPAU / SPDD Transport During Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0

We are currently upgrading R/3 4.6C to ECC 6.0 SR2. During the DEV upgrade, we performed Dictionary Objects adjustments before ACT 7.00 and SPAU adjustments at the end of the upgrade. All the adjustments are collected in a transport.
I read in another thread that we will have to choose 'SELECT FOR TRANSPORT' button in SPAU and not release it. Then, continue with the upgrade. And in the same thread, it is also mentioned that DDIC object modifications should not be handled through transports.
Now, my question is, if I have collected the SPAU adjustments in a transport and continued with the upgrade without choosing the 'SELECT FOR TRANSPORT' button, can I do it after I complete the upgrade before I continue with QAS upgrade? Will the upgrade still automatically detect the transports and move them? And, my other question is, if DDIC modifications are not supposed to be dealt through transports, how else should they be worked upon?
Your response ASAP will be rewarded properly.
Thank you.

Nick, thank you for the reference. Even though I had gone through this note before, I couldn't apply this note because, this note was refering to "R3up" which, I guess, is no more used. "SAPup" is the program currently in use. Also the location mentioned in the note to execute "R3up" is "//usr/sap/put/exe" but, "SAPup" is located under "//usr/sap/put/bin/". So, I am not sure if there is any new notes refering to this. One other question I have with regards to this note is, one of the arguments for the command R3up is, "REL". For SPDD, the note suggests to use target release. And for SPAU, the note suggest to use the release mentioned in the DDIC activation phase.
In my case, I am upgrading from 4.6D (kernel) to 700 (kernel). The DDIC activation shows ACT_700. So, I am sure I would use "700" as value for "REL" for SPDD. But, am I supposed to use "46D" for SPAU? or should I use "700"?
Thank you.

HR Objects in SPAU during upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0

Hello,
We are in the process of upgrading and have come to the point in SAPup where we need to address all customizations in SPAU. There were several HR objects displayed (both logical and physical info objects), and from what I have been reading, there should be no HR objects listed. I followed the instructions in OSS note 519678 to remove unnecessary HR objects from table SMODILOG using program H99PDSY_REPAIR_SMODILOG. This did remove quite a few, but I am still left with some.
Can anyone provide information on what I should do to resolve this issue. I thought that maybe, the information that HR objects should not be in SPAU could be wrong, so I attempted to reset one object to original. When I did this, it prompted me to create a new "customizing" transport request, when all of the other objects related to SPAU were put into a "workbench" transport. I also understand that there should only be one transport for all SPAU adjustments, so this further makes me believe these objects should not be showing up.
Thank you,
Leeanna

Hello Leeanna,
Apply this note. and execute the mentioned report, this deletes all the HR objects
Note 634146 - SPAU: Objects from the customer namespace in SPAU

Multimedia audio controllers not found? Upgrade from Win XP to 7 on HP 1129n. Please help

so i upgraded my hp 1129n (oldschool li know) from win xp to 7, The install went smoothly except for the audio. Went into device manager and there is a question mark on other devices > multimedia audio controller.
I have searched everywhere for the driver update but its no where to be found, not on hp's site or i cant find it on the web. I have attempted to run windows vista sp37322 but no luck. i have changed the compatibilty to windows vista sp 2 and windows xp sp 2 and 3 and ran as administrator to see if i could get something but it still wont let me telling me error
UNINITIALIZED VARIABLE , UNDEFINED FUCNTION ON UNQUOTED STRING
ON LINE 433 OF W:\PATECHES\IP\SP37322\INSTALL.WBT
IF OS == "VISTA"
please help. Not sure how else to get the proper multimedia audio controller to get it fully functional.
thanks for your help

so i upgraded my hp 1129n (oldschool li know) from win xp to 7, The install went smoothly except for the audio. Went into device manager and there is a question mark on other devices > multimedia audio controller.
I have searched everywhere for the driver update but its no where to be found, not on hp's site or i cant find it on the web. I have attempted to run windows vista sp37322 but no luck. i have changed the compatibilty to windows vista sp 2 and windows xp sp 2 and 3 and ran as administrator to see if i could get something but it still wont let me telling me error
UNINITIALIZED VARIABLE , UNDEFINED FUCNTION ON UNQUOTED STRING
ON LINE 433 OF W:\PATECHES\IP\SP37322\INSTALL.WBT
IF OS == "VISTA"
please help. Not sure how else to get the proper multimedia audio controller to get it fully functional.
thanks for your help

M_vmvah missing during upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0

Hi,
After upgrading, our Z programs are having compilation errors due to missing table m_vmvah. Is there any replacement table for m_vmvah in ECC 6.0? Thanks.
Regards,
Abner

1. Call transaction SMQ1 and check whether all queues in all clients (client = '', queue name 'MCEX') have been processed. To process the queues, start the collective run report for each application in the displayed clients. If you no longer need the data in the BW system, deactivate the relevant extraction queues and DataSource in the LO cockpit (transaction LBWE) and delete the queue entries in transaction SMQ1.
2. If you use the V3 update that is not serialized (usually only for application 03): Start collective run report RMBWV303. Then check the update orders in transaction SM13. If there are incorrect update orders in transaction SM13, correct the orders and then start the collective run report again. If you no longer require the update orders, you can delete them. There may be inconsistencies between tables VBMOD and VBHDR. For further information about this, see Notes 652310 and 67014.
3. Before the upgrade, delete the contents of the setup tables. Execute report RMCEX_SETUP_ENTRIES to find out which setup tables still contain entries. You can use transaction LBWG to delete the contents of the setup tables for all clients.
Unfortunately the check that the system carries out during the upgrade or when you import a Support Package does not display all affected applications. Therefore, Note 1083709 provides a check report that you can use to determine all affected applications and tables or queues.

Find button issue in tool bar during upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6

Hi All,
I came across one issue during the upgarde.
In new system ECC 6:
When i run the transaction IW51 then give the notification type SE(service notificaton) and then hit enter key.
It leads to next screen there enter the value in the FUNCTIONAL lOCATION field some ex 9000004 and
opposite to that field there is a structure list icon.
Clicking that icon it leads to a structure list.
My issue is: the FIND button and FIND NEXT button are disabled in the menu bar.I need the both buttons to be active
When i seen in old system i.e 4.6c
FIND button and FIND NEXT button are active.
I made little change in the new system in include MIHIXF82 as shown below.
SET PF-STATUS 'MAIN' ."EXCLUDING gt_excl_tab.
I commented the EXCLUDING gt_excl_tab.
Now FIND button and FIND NEXT button is active but when i click the FIND button there is no pop up is displayed.
Usually pop up is displayed when we click FIND button in that we can enter the value which we have to find out.
Regards
Jai
Edited by: Jayanth16 on Jan 28, 2010 8:07 AM

Hi,
In that program gui status MAIN is used.
When i see that gui status and in FUNCTION KEYS the FIND button and FIND NEXT button
the function codes are in orange color.Remaing BACK,EXIT,and CANCEL button function code are in white color.
Whether the orange color indicates is in inactive mode?
If so how can i activate those Function codes?
Regards
Jai

Call SAP function from VB - Structure member not found " unknown "

Hello,
(I don't know if this is the appropriate forum, but I didn't find any which seem to match my topic ...)
I use the following VB code to call the SAP function ARCHIV_PROCESS_RFCINPUT:
    Dim bapiControl As SAPBAPIControl
    Dim logonControl As SAPLogonControl
    Dim functions As SAPFunctions
    Set bapiControl = New SAPBAPIControl
    Set logonControl = New SAPLogonControl
    Set functions = New SAPFunctions
    Set bapiControl.Connection = logonControl.NewConnection
    ' do login
    Set functions.Connection = bapiControl.Connection
    Dim myFunction As SAPFunctionsOCX.Function
    Set myFunction = functions.Add("ARCHIV_PROCESS_RFCINPUT")
    Dim myStructure As SAPFunctionsOCX.Structure
    Set myStructure = functions.CreateStructure("OARFCIN")
    ' the following values are just examples
    myStructure("ARCHIV_ID") = "01"
    myStructure("ARC_DOC_ID") = "1234567890123457890"
    myStructure("AR_OBJECT") = "TIF"
    myStructure("DOC_TYPE") = "FIIINVOICE"
    myStructure("BARCODE") = "1"
    myFunction.Exports("DOCUMENT_ENTRY") = myStructure
At this point execution stops with the following error message:
Err.Number: 1006
Err.Description: Structure member not found "<unknown>"
Err.Source: wdtfuncs
What is wrong? The function ARCHIV_PROCESS_RFCINPUT needs one input parameter called "DOCUMENT_ENTRY" which is of type OARFCIN ...
ARCHIV_CONNECTION_INSERT, which has only Strings as input parameters (no structures), works fine ...
I tried all variations I could think of:
myStructure.Value("ARCHIV_ID") = G_csDefaultRepository
instead of myStructure("ARCHIV_ID") = G_csDefaultRepository
declaring bapiControl, logonControl and functions as Object, and instanciating them with CreateObject(...)
myFunction.Exports(0).Insert "DOCUMENT_ENTRY", myStructure
instead of myFunction.Exports("DOCUMENT_ENTRY") = myStructure
(which gave me a "Collection member not found" error) ...
Nothing worked ...
What is wrong with this code??
Thanks for help!
Regards
Steffi

Hi Ralf,
try substituting following code:
' the following values are just examples
myStructure("ARCHIV_ID") = "01"
myStructure("ARC_DOC_ID") = "1234567890123457890"
myStructure("AR_OBJECT") = "TIF"
myStructure("DOC_TYPE") = "FIIINVOICE"
myStructure("BARCODE") = "1"
myFunction.Exports("DOCUMENT_ENTRY") = myStructure
with that one:
Set myStructure = myFunction.Exports("DOCUMENT_ENTRY")
' the following values are just examples
myStructure.Fields("ARCHIV_ID") = "01"
myStructure.Fields("ARC_DOC_ID") = "1234567890123457890"
myStructure.Fields("AR_OBJECT") = "TIF"
myStructure.Fields("DOC_TYPE") = "FIIINVOICE"
myStructure.Fields("BARCODE") = "1"
Let me know!
Enjoy!!

Can we activate Classic General Ledger in ECC6.0 during upgrade from 4.6C

Dear SAP Gurus,
Greetings
My Client's technical team had upgraded their system from 4.6C to ECC6.0 and they had activated classic GL instead of New GL. And they had also activated classic withholding tax in place of Extended Withholding tax.
They are facing some error during posting of transactions (like generation of excise invoices, posting of WHT transactions, etc.) I told that it can be a reason of not activating New GL.
Is my understanding correct...?? Can we activate classic GL during upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6.0...??
In case of a new client built (with ECC6.0), can we activate the classic GL instead of the New GL..??
Does the system will work correctly in the long run if they had activated classic GL and classic WHT...??
Please clarify. Thanks in advance for your time and efforts
Regards,
Chaps
P.S. Points will be awarded for answers !!

Hi,
I think that you should read long text of OSS note 999614 carfully and you are
aware of the fact that you will have additional migration efforts in
case you need to migrate to new G/L later on.
In case you are convinced that this is the best way please feel free
to deactivate new G/L as described in note 999614.
Please make sure that you deactivate new G/L in all clients of your
new system in case there were already client copies done.
Yes this is possible and I would not automatically assume that
error during posting of transactions are due to New GL not being activated.
Note 756146 documents the issue and possible repercussions
of using Classic GL.
In the case of a new installation the new G/L accounting
is active by default in ERP. In principle, the use
of the classic GL is also possible for new customers, however,
SAP does not recommend it since this requires an additional
migration expense in later years.
Regards,
Aidan

BW specific task during R/3 upgradation from 4.7 to ECC 6.0

Hi Everybody,
We are planning R/3 upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0. We are using BW 3.5 . So, Can anybody share BW 3.5 specific task during pre-upgrade as well as post-upgrade for ECC Upgrade.
Thanks & Regards,
Sushant N. Tiwarekar

Hello ALex,
There is not a must to upgrade also your solman 3.2 when you upgrade your satellites, only consider if you need the solman diagnostic or not and also that the new functionality in solman 4.0.
Which system is unicode, the satellite?
There is also not problems having a non-unicode solman with unicode satellites and the other, having a unicode-solman "linked" to unicode-satellites.
Hope this helps,
Dolores

HT1386 my sync stops due to iphone not found during the final copy step...how do I fix?

my sync stops with an error message that iphone not founds during the final copy step...how to I fix? always work before.

The backup is located at: iTunes/Preferences/Devices. Select the backup from the window and hit the delete key. Then connect your iPhone to your computer. It'll take a new backup.

Class not found during deserialization of descriptor UserSession

I am using JDeveloper 3.1.1.2 (build 767) to deploy an EJB to Oracle 8.1.6 and I get the following error message....
Generating EJBHome and EJBObject on the server...
Class not found during deserialization of descriptor UserSession
*** Errors occurred while deploying the EJB to JServer ***
*** Deployment completed ***
I've tried
a) to deploy all the classes in the project,
b) create a new project step by step,
c) use 'deployejb' and I still get the same error...
Can anyone help? Thanks.

Yep, JDeveloper auto generates the <>.ejb and it is a binary file.
Seems a pretty specific error message....any help available from the JDev team??

Structure SI_BBSEG not found during upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for