Stuck on a case statement

Hopefully this is not to trivial for you experts but here goes
I am trying to run the below code - Its been a long while since I have done any SQL programming and need some help here
thanks in advance
select ETIC
     (CASE
     WHEN SUBSTR(AIRCRAFT.ETIC, 0, 1) = 'P' OR AIRCRAFT.ETIC IS NULL
THEN
     (CASE
WHEN (SUBSTR(AIRCRAFT.ETIC, 0, 1) = 'P') THEN
('P+' || LTRIM(SUBSTR(AIRCRAFT.ETIC, 6, 3), '0'))
ELSE AIRCRAFT.ETIC
END)
ELSE (TO_CHAR(TO_DATE( ('20' || AIRCRAFT.ETIC), 'YYYYDDDHH24MI'), 'DD-MON@HH24MI'))
     END)
     "ETIC"
from AIRCRAFT;

There may possibly be experts here, but few are actually clairvoyant.
The problem is...?
Does it have anything to do with SQL Developer? If it is a general Oracle SQL question it should be posted PL/SQL.

Similar Messages

Update and Case Statement

Dear All,
I got stuck with the following statement. The error "ORA-00904: "DOC"."CRED_RPT_RCPT_IND": invalid identifier" seems make no sense. I checked the column and it looks right to me. Can someone help? Thanks!
SQL> update zz_supplier_documentation A
2 set forma_dcmtn_rcpt_stus_cd =
3 (case
4 when loc.busns_type_cd ='1'
5 and doc.CASH_FLOW_RCPT_IND='Y'
6 and doc.BAL_SHEET_RCPT_IND='Y'
7 and doc.INCM_STMT_RCPT_IND='Y'
8 and doc.SCHDL_L_RCPT_IND='Y'
9 and doc.CRED_RPT_RCPT_IND='Y'
10 then '02' ---for complete
11 else '01' ---for incomplete
12 end
13 )
14 where A.suplr_id in
15 (select doc.suplr_id
16 from cbss.zz_supplier_location loc,
17 cbss.zz_supplier_documentation doc
18 where loc.suplr_id = doc.suplr_id);
and doc.CRED_RPT_RCPT_IND='Y'
ERROR at line 9:
ORA-00904: "DOC"."CRED_RPT_RCPT_IND": invalid identifier
Below is the table definition:
SQL> desc zz_supplier_documentation
Name Null? Type
SUPLR_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(38)
BIDDER_NUM CHAR(7)
NSC_NUM CHAR(10)
CASH_FLOW_RCPT_IND CHAR(1)
BAL_SHEET_RCPT_IND CHAR(1)
INCM_STMT_RCPT_IND CHAR(1)
SCHDL_L_RCPT_IND CHAR(1)
SCHDL_C_RCPT_IND CHAR(1)
CRED_RPT_RCPT_IND CHAR(1)
FORM_10K_RCPT_IND CHAR(1)
EXPNSN_LTR_RCPT_IND CHAR(1)
LGL_NTWRK_MBR_CNTRCT_RCPT_IND CHAR(1)
CRTFCTN_DCMTN_RCPT_IND CHAR(1)
FORMA_DCMTN_RCPT_STUS_CD CHAR(2)
LAST_CHG_USER_ID VARCHAR2(80)
LAST_CHG_DT DATE
FORMB_DCMTN_RCPT_STUS_CD CHAR(2)

Joel,
This is statement that I got an error on. The invalid character error was on line 9:
and doc.CRED_RPT_RCPT_IND='Y'
I do not see any invalid character on this line. So, I am stuck now.
update zz_supplier_documentation A
set forma_dcmtn_rcpt_stus_cd =
(case
when loc.busns_type_cd ='1'
and doc.CASH_FLOW_RCPT_IND='Y'
and doc.BAL_SHEET_RCPT_IND='Y'
and doc.INCM_STMT_RCPT_IND='Y'
and doc.SCHDL_L_RCPT_IND='Y'
and doc.CRED_RPT_RCPT_IND='Y'
then '02' ---for complete
else '01' ---for incomplete
end
where A.suplr_id in
(select doc.suplr_id
from cbss.zz_supplier_location loc,
cbss.zz_supplier_documentation doc
where loc.suplr_id = doc.suplr_id);

Count Distinct Wtih CASE Statement - Does not follow aggregation path

All,
I have a fact table, a day aggregate and a month aggregate. I have a time hierarchy and the month aggregate is set to the month level, the day aggregate is set to the day level within the time hierarchy.
When using any measures and a field from my time dimension .. the appropriate aggregate is chosen, ie month & activity count .. month aggregate is used. Day & activity count .. day aggregate is used.
However - when I use the count distinct aggregate rule .. the request always uses the lowest common denominator. The way I have found to get this to work is to use a logical table source override in the aggregation tab. Once I do this .. it does use the aggregates correctly.
A few questions
1. Is this the correct way to use aggregate navigation for the count distinct aggregation rule (using the source override option)? If yes, why is this necessary for count distinct .. what is special about it?
2. The main problem I have now is that I need to create a simple count measure that has a CASE statement in it. The only way I see to do this is to select the Based on Dimensions checkbox which then allows me to add a CASE statement into my count distinct clause. But now the aggregation issue comes back into play and I can't do the logical table source override when the based on dimensions checkbox is checked .. so I am now stuck .. any help is appreciated.
K

Ok - I found a workaround (and maybe the preferred solution for my particular issue), which is - Using a CASE Statement with a COUNT DISTINCT aggregation and still havine AGGREGATE AWARENESS
To get all three of the requirements above to work I had to do the following:
- Create the COUNT DISTINCT as normal (counting on a USERID physically mapped column in my case)
- Now I need to map my fact and aggregates to this column. This is where I got the case statement to work. Instead of trying to put the case statement inside of the Aggregate definition by using the checkbox 'Base on Dimension' (which didnt allow for aggregate awareness for some reason) .. I instead specified the case statement in the Column Mapping section of the Fact and Aggregate tables.
- Once all the LTS's (facts and aggregates) are mapped .. you still have to define the Logical Table Source overrides in the aggregate tab of the count distinct definition. Add in all the fact and aggregates.
Now the measure will use my month aggregate when i specify month, the day aggregate when i specify day, etc..
If you are just trying to use a Count Distinct (no CASE satement needed) with Aggregate Awareness, you just need to use the Logical Table Source override on the aggregate tab.
There is still a funky issue when using the COUNT aggregate type. As long as you dont map multiple logical table sources to the COUNT column it works fine and as expected. But, if you try to add in multiple sources and aggregate awareness it randomly starts SUMMING everything .. very weird. The blog in this thread says to check the 'Based on Dimension' checkbox to fix the problem but that did not work for me. Still not sure what to do on this one .. but its not currently causing me a problem so I will ignore for now ;)
Thanks for all the help
K

Help With A Case Statement With Multiple Variables

I apologize if this is the incorrect Forum for this type of question, but it was the closest one that I could find. I'm pretty new with SQL and am stuck on this issue. I have roughly 26 dates that I need to compare to one another. Each date is tied to a step code. I also have a Stop value that is tied directly to the "max date" of the step codes. So, I need to compare 30 dates against one another to 1st - ID the max date; 2nd - ID if the Stop value is correct; 3rd - if the stop value is incorrect, identify what the correct value would be.
At first, this seemed like it wouldn't be that hard. I wrote a query that found the max date for each step code. Then I realized that multiple step codes could have the same date. So, I tried using this case statement, but I did not get the expected results. Is there a more efficient way of getting what I need? This code seems like it's not necessary and probably the source of my issue.
CASE
WHEN FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS1.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS2.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS3.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS4.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS5.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS6.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS7.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS8.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS9.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS10.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS11.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS12.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS13.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS14.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS15.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS16.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS17.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS18.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS19.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS20.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS21.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS22.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS23.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND FS25.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE > FS24.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE AND L.FORECLOSURE_STOP_CODE <= '8' THEN '9'
ELSE 'UH OH'
END AS "CHANGE FC STOP TO"
Any assistance is appreciated!

I think Igor pointed out a working solution before.
Applying it at your examples (you missed the operator after STOP_CODE, I assume it =):
CASE
WHEN FS25 = GREATEST(FS25, FS24, FS23) AND STOP_CODE = '9' THEN '9'
ELSE 'UH OH'
END AS 'CHANGE STOP CODE TO'
{code}
Be careful at the second example. You are checking:
{code:sql}
FS25 > FS24 OR FS25 IS NOT NULL AND FS24 IS NULL AND FS25 > FS23
OR
FS25 IS NOT NULL AND FS23 IS NULL AND STOP_CODE = '9'
{code}
Remember that AND has higher priority among operators than OR so if FS25 is greater than FS24 and FS23 the condition will be true even if STOP_CODE is not equal 9.
Regards.
Al

SQL Expression in decode function or case statement?

Can I put SQL expressions in decode function or case statement?
For example,
select le.profile, decode( select count(1) from profile_data where NAME= 'XXXX_AFTER' and object_id = le.profile, 0, 'N', 'Y')
from element le;
or
select le.profile, case WHEN ( select count(1) from profile_data where NAME= 'XXXX_AFTER' and object_id = le.profile) = 0 THEN 'N'
ELSE 'Y'
from element le;
None of the above work.
Can anyone tell me how to make it work?
Is there any workaround?
Thanks,
J

You simply needed and END to your CASE statement;
SQL> with profile_data as (
   select 'XXXX_AFTER' name, 1 object_id from dual),
     element as (
   select 1 profile from dual union all
   select 2 from dual)
select le.profile,
   case WHEN ( select count(1) from profile_data where NAME= 'XXXX_AFTER' and object_id = le.profile) = 0
   THEN 'N'
   ELSE 'Y'
   END new_col
from element le
   PROFILE N
         1 Y
         2 N

CASE not found while executing CASE statement on Submit Form

Hi to all APEX users and developers.
I have several APEX applications and they are all working well, but recently I got one strange exception when I try to submit page:
Session: Fetch session header information
...metadata, fetch page info
...Validate item page affinity.
...Validate hidden_protected items.
Add error onto error stack
...Error data:
......message: Error processing request.
......additional_info: ORA-06592: CASE not found while executing CASE statement
......display_location: ON_ERROR_PAGE
......is_internal_error: true
......apex_error_code: APEX.UNHANDLED_ERROR
......ora_sqlcode: -6592
......ora_sqlerrm: ORA-06592: CASE not found while executing CASE statement
.....error_backtrace: ORA-06512: at "APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW", line 9273
......component.type: APEX_APPLICATION_AUTH
......component.id: 41350431648668800
......component.name: MNRFR
...Show Error on Error Page
......Performing rollback
Processes - point: AFTER_ERROR_HEADER
Processes - point: BEFORE_ERROR_FOOTER
End Page Processinga
Page has more than 120 items (most of them are hidden), so my first thought is that page has problem with posting so many items, but APEX error message doesn't hel me at all. Any help would be very appreciated :)
Almir

Hi Almir,
actually it is the 100 page item limit. See (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17556_01/doc/user.40/e15517/limits.htm)
I also had a look into the source code and the code at the position where the error gets raised only supports 100 page items.
Can you have a look into the generated HTML code and look if you have a page items which is mapped to p_t101 or a higher number ?
I will file a bug to show a better error message.
Regards
Patrick
My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
APEX Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

Case statement

hi.
i have a case statement query. i wonder if in the select statement, can i do computation using different parameter from the main report to subreport?
for example, (qty * parameter)
if parameter = 0, i uses $P{abc} to multiply qty
if parameter > 0, i uses $P{xyz} to multiply qty
in this case, i've writen a sql (as below) but its does not execute.
select ....., (QTY *
case $P{QTY}
when 0 then ' * $P{abc}'
else ' $P{xyz}'
end
from....
hence, what should i do in order to get the right parameter to multiply with? pls guide. thanks.

I'm not sure about these parameter placeholders which are specific to whatever report tool you are using, but the structure would be (assuming the parameter value would never be less than zero):
qty * case when $P{QTY} = 0 then $P{abc} else $P{xyz} end

Case Statement in Answers Filter

Hi,
I'm trying to build a query in Answers that filters the data returned based on the current month number. If the current month is 1 then we want to show all 12 months, otherwise we want to show months less than the current month. If I use the following:
CASE WHEN extract(month from current_date) = 1 THEN "Calculated Values Monthly"."MONTH" >= 1 ELSE "Calculated Values Monthly"."MONTH" < extract (month from current_date) END
I get the error below. All works fine until I add the CASE.
Error Codes: YQCO4T56:OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
Location: saw.views.evc.activate, saw.httpserver.processrequest, saw.rpc.server.responder, saw.rpc.server, saw.rpc.server.handleConnection, saw.rpc.server.dispatch, saw.threadpool, saw.threadpool, saw.threads
Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 27002] Near <>=>: Syntax error [nQSError: 26012] . (HY000)
Can you use a case statement in a filter? If not, what are the other options, if any?
Thx

ziekc wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a query in Answers that filters the data returned based on the current month number. If the current month is 1 then we want to show all 12 months, otherwise we want to show months less than the current month. If I use the following:
CASE WHEN extract(month from current_date) = 1 THEN "Calculated Values Monthly"."MONTH" >= 1 ELSE "Calculated Values Monthly"."MONTH" < extract (month from current_date) END
I get the error below. All works fine until I add the CASE.
Error Codes: YQCO4T56:OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
Location: saw.views.evc.activate, saw.httpserver.processrequest, saw.rpc.server.responder, saw.rpc.server, saw.rpc.server.handleConnection, saw.rpc.server.dispatch, saw.threadpool, saw.threadpool, saw.threads
Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 27002] Near <>=>: Syntax error [nQSError: 26012] . (HY000)
Can you use a case statement in a filter? If not, what are the other options, if any?
ThxAccording to your requirements, when the month is January, you want all 12 months; any other number and you want months from 1 to "1 less than the current month number." Yes? Okay, here's what to do:
In the filter on your date column, click on the filter button, convert it to SQL and enter this:
MONTH(tablename.date_column) BETWEEN 1 AND CASE WHEN MONTH(CURRENT_DATE) = 1 THEN 12 ELSE MONTH(CURRENT_DATE)-1 END
Here's the logic:
a) When the current month is January, then the case statement will yield 12 and the filter will be:
WHERE MONTH(tablename.date_column) BETWEEN 1 AND 12 ...or all 12 months.
b) When the current month is any other month, say June, then the case statement will yield one less than the what the month number is, or in this case 5.
WHERE MONTH(tablename.date_column BETWEEN 1 AND 5 ...or all the months from 1 to 5 (Jan through May)
This will give you what you want...

CASE statement in Calculated column

Hi Frzz,
I have below requirement in Calculated column with CASE statement. Could some one help me how to achieve this with case statement.
String =   0Hello
                01Hello
                012Hello
                0123Hello
If 1st Character of the string is '0' then - 0Hello
    1st 2 characters of the String is '01' -   22Hello
    1st 3 characters of the String is '01' -   333Hello
    1st 4 characters of the String is '01' - 4444Hello
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Krishna.

Hi Krishna ,
Using IF and MATCH to do that: ( I took one of the conditions you specified )
IF(match("STRING1",'??0??'),'333Hello',"STRING1")
Output:
Regards,
Krishna Tangudu

CASE statement in PL/SQL

Hi PL/SQL experts,
I'm going a bit loopy here, so could someone please point out what I'm doing wrong with this case statement:
Test procedure is:
CREATE OR REPLACE procedure SCOTT.postcode_validate_2 (input_post_code VARCHAR2) as
alphabet_string VARCHAR2(52) := 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvxwyz';
number_string VARCHAR2(10) := '012345789';
last_part_postcode VARCHAR2(3) := NULL;
BEGIN
IF INSTR(input_post_code,' ') = 0
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We need a space in the postcode please');
GOTO exit;
ELSIF LENGTH(SUBSTR(input_post_code,instr(input_post_code,' ')+1)) > 3
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Last part of postcode can only be 3 characters');
GOTO exit;
ELSE
last_part_postcode := SUBSTR(input_post_code,instr(input_post_code,' ')+1);
END IF;
CASE input_post_code
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 2
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format A9')
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format A9');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 3
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format AA9')
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format AA9');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 3
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format A99')
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format A99');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 3
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format A9A')
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format A9A');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 4
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,4,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format AA99')
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format AA99');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 4
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,4,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format AA9A')
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format AA9A');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
END;
-- Check last part of format, should be AA9
IF (instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('End part of the postcode is in the correct format, 9AA');
ELSE
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('End part of the postcode is in the wrong format!');
END IF;
<<exit>>
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Please try again');
END;
However, I'm getting the following error:
LINE/COL ERROR
37/6 PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "WHEN" when expecting one of
the following:
:= . ( % ;
On a second note, can I not have the ELSE structure embedded within the case (currently commented out)?
Thanks very much in advance.
Dev

Fixed code:
CREATE OR REPLACE procedure postcode_validate_2 (input_post_code VARCHAR2) as
alphabet_string VARCHAR2(52) := 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvxwyz';
number_string VARCHAR2(10) := '012345789';
last_part_postcode VARCHAR2(3) := NULL;
BEGIN
IF INSTR(input_post_code,' ') = 0
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We need a space in the postcode please');
GOTO exit;
ELSIF LENGTH(SUBSTR(input_post_code,instr(input_post_code,' ')+1)) > 3
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Last part of postcode can only be 3 characters');
GOTO exit;
ELSE
last_part_postcode := SUBSTR(input_post_code,instr(input_post_code,' ')+1);
END IF;
CASE
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 2
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format A9');
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format A9');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 3
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format AA9');
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format AA9');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 3
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format A99');
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format A99');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 3
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format A9A');
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format A9A');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 4
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,4,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format AA99');
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format AA99');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
WHEN (length(substr(input_post_code,1,instr(input_post_code,' ')-1)) = 4
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,4,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('We have a valid postcode in the format AA9A');
-- ELSE
-- DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Sorry but that is an incorrect postcode! Format AA9A');
-- GOTO exit;
-- END IF;
END CASE;
-- Check last part of format, should be AA9
IF (instr(number_string,substr(input_post_code,1,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,2,1)) != 0
AND instr(alphabet_string,substr(input_post_code,3,1)) != 0)
THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('End part of the postcode is in the correct format, 9AA');
ELSE
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('End part of the postcode is in the wrong format!');
END IF;
<<exit>>
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Please try again');
END;
/As VG2 pointed out you were missing some semicolons.
Also, CASE input_post_code was replaced with just CASE since you are doing a searched case.
Also, END at the end of the case statement was replaced with END CASE.

Case statement in advanced sql

how to use case statement in advanced sql.Example if quarter=1 i need to select jan,fev,and march months from table

this is the case statement i am using :
case when 1=@{quarter} then substring(cast((etxnmis.month_year) as char) from 5 for 2) IN ('03', '04', '05') else null end
and i get the below error
: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 27002] Near <IN>: Syntax error [nQSError: 26012] . (HY000)

T-sql case statement in a select

When I execute the following t-sql 2012 statement, the "NO Prod' value is not
being displayed from the sql listed below:
SELECT DISTINCT
IsNull(cs.TYPE,'') as type,
CASE IsNull(Course.TYPE,'')
WHEN 'AP' then 'AP Prod'
WHEN 'IB' then 'IB Prod'
WHEN 'HR' then 'HR Prod'
WHEN '' then 'NO Prod'
END AS label
FROM CustSection cs
INNER JOIN dbo.Person p on P.personID = cs.personID
Left join customCustomer cs564 on cs564.personID = p.personID and
cs564.attributeID ='564'
   where ( cs.type is null and cs564.attributeID = null)
     or
    (cs.type IN ('HR','AP') OR
      (cs.type='IB' AND SUBSTRING(cs.code,1,1)='3'))
ORDER BY label
What I want is for 'NO Prod' to be displayed when
cs.type is null and cs564.attributeId is null.
Thus can you tell me how to fix query above so the 'NO Prod' value is displayed in the
select statement listed above?

There is no CASE statement in SQL; we have a CASE expression. We do not use the old 1970's Sybase*- ISNULL(); we have COALESCE().
There is no such thing as a magic generic “type” in RDBMS. There is no such thing as a generic “code” in RDBMS. They have to to be “<something in particular>_type” and “<something in particular>_code” in a valid data model. How about blood_type
and postal_code??
There is no such thing as a generic “person” table in RDBMS. First of all, do you really have only one person, as you said?? But the important point is that these persons play a role in the data model – customers, students, etc. You are doing the wrong thing
and doing it badly. This table should not exist any more than a table of “Things” such exist.
And the reason you are beyond any real help is “attribute_id” which tell us that your schema is a total disaster of data and meta data mixed together in a non-RDBMS written in awful SQL. Based on cleaning up bad SQL for 30 years, it looks like you are an OO
programmer who never unlearned his prior mindset.
Why did you allow an encoding schema with blanks? Why do you have so many NULL-able columns?
SELECT DISTINCT is very rare in a properly designed schema. The DRI references assure that rows cam be matched. To get you started, look at this skeleton:
CREATE TABLE Products
(product_gtin CHAR(15) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
product_type CHAR(2) DEFAULT 'XX' NOT NULL
CHECK (product_type IN ('AP', 'IB', 'HR', 'XX'))
The table name is a plural noun because it models a set (NOT an OO class).
The GTIN is an industry standard identifiers, and not have to invent our own.
The product_type (not blood_type, not automobile_body_type!) has a constraint that assures it is never NULL and never blank; I invented 'XX' as a default.
You need more help than you can get in a forum, but if you will follow Netiquette and post the DDL, we can get you started.
--CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

CASE Statement in a SELECt

I want to do something like this in a SELECT where I set the value of one field based on another. Is this possible. If not are there any alternatives? Thanks
CASE WHEN [var_cpnt_brkpt_ct] = '0' THEN [enrc_cpnt_var_price_rt] = '0'

There is no CASE statement in SQL; we are a declarative language. We have a case expression! There is no control flow, like you are trying to write. You do not even know that fields are columns. This is as silly
as asking for the color the feathers on a fish.
--CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking in
Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL
Thank you for your support. Good day Sir.

CASE Statement in Where Condition with Multi Valued parameter in SSRS

Hi All,
I am little confused while using CASE statement in Where condition in SSRS. Below is my scenario:
SELECT
Logic here
WHERE
Date IN (@Date)AND
(CASE
WHEN NAME LIKE 'ABC%' THEN 'GROUP1'
WHEN ID IN ('123456', '823423','74233784') THEN 'GROUP2'
WHEN ABC_ID IS NULL THEN 'GROUP3'
ELSE 'GROUP4'
END ) IN (@GROUP)
So above query uses WHERE condition with CASE statement from @GROUP parameter. I want to pass this parameter as multi- valued parameter and hence I have used CASE statement IN (@GROUP).
For @Date one dataset will pass the available and default values and
for @GROUP parameters, another dataset will pass the available and default values.
But this is not working as expected. Please suggest me where I am making mistake in the query.
Maruthu | http://sharepoint-works.blogspot.com

Hi Maruthu,
According to your description, I create a sample report in my local environment. It works as I expected. In your scenario, if the selected values from the Date parameter contains some of the Date field values, the selected values from the GROUP parameter
contains some of GROUPS (‘GROUP1’,’GROUP2’,’GROUP3’,’GROUP4’) and the corresponding when statement is executed , then the dataset returns the corresponding values.
In order to trouble shoot this issue, could you tell us what results are you get and what’s your desired results? If possible, you can post the sample data with sample dataset, then we can make further analysis and help you out.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Using null in CASE statements

Hi,
I have query with a case statement as follows:
SELECT * FROM table
WHERE
CASE WHEN :variable like 'A' THEN column END is null
WHEN :variable like 'B' THEN column END is not null;
This works fine when returning "column is null" but not when "column is not null".
Can I use a CASE statement like this?
Thanks
Lucy

My data is too complicated to show, but depending on the value of the bind variable in the statement I want to return all the rows in a query where the data in a particular column is either null or not null.For example, looking at the EMP table, if my bind variable is whether I want to show the top manager or not, if set to 'Yes' I would like to return all rows of the EMP table where mgr is null (i.e. the one row where ename is 'KING'), if it were set to 'No' I would like to return all the rows where mgr is not null (i.e. all the other rows). The difference with my query is that the column contains strings, not numerics.
I've used a CASE statement before where I equate the column to a particular value and that works fine, but I'm not sure how they deal with nulls. I've also tried DECODE and didn't get anywhere with that.
Thanks
Lucy

Stuck on a case statement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for