Subclips - Automate to Sequence: Ignores Subclip Length

My Research didn't find any answers to my problem:
Dragging and Dropping Subclips to the Sequence works as expected: Only the (shortened) length of the Subclip is dragged on the Timeline.
By Using "Automate to Sequence" the length of the original Clip (much longer) is dropped on the Timeline.
Is this by Design? I expected the same behaviour like dragging and dropping. With this behaviour its impossible to create quick rough cuts when you have Subclips in the project.
Any ideas?

Workaround for me: The length of the SubClip is not ignored if you check the "Restrict Trims To Subclip Boundaries" at the Subclip Properties at the time you use the "Automate to Sequence" Function.
If you had to trim/extend the SubClip Boundaries afterwards, you have to uncheck the option for every subclip you used. So this really just i a workaround in my opinion.
So is this an issue for a bug report?

Similar Messages

  • Audio tracks missing when doing automate to sequence.

    Using PMW200 with 4 audio tracks. When dragging single file to timeline I get the 4 audio tracks. But when I do an automate to sequence, I only get 1 audio track, plus, the default audio transition is not going on.
    I have all the tracks highlighted and have ticked apply audio and video transitions.
    Any idea where I'm going wrong? Thanks
    Mike Ward

    Hi Kevin.  I uploaded a clip onto you tube for you to try, but you tube mixed the audio tracks so it was useless.
    Basically, drag any video clip with 4 audio tracks recorded from camera onto timeline in cs6, and all audio tracks appear on the timeline.  But automate several similar tracks to timeline and only one audio track gets added.  The other 3 do not appear.  Is there a work around for this, rather than dragging all on one at a time.
    Thanks

  • Automate to Sequence - Set To Unnumbered Markers

    I'm using Premier Pro CS3 on a Windows XP machine. I've found that if I select the "Sequentially" Placement Option under "Automate to Sequence" the other option (Set to Unnumbered Markers)in the drop-down box completely disappears (not just grayed out but gone from the program). It doesn't re-appear with a re-boot. The only way to get it to come back is to first, find the Adobe Preferences file buried deep under the users tree and then delete it. I've had to do this several times and it works. I've recently installed CS3 on a brand new workstation (the one described above) and the problem has continued, a new problem is, now I can't locate the Adobe Preferences file anywhere on the machine so I'm unable to delete it.
    Is this a problem that Adobe is 1)aware of, and 2)working on.
    Are there any work-arounds?
    I use/need the "Set to Unnumbered Markers" frequently and hate wasting time chasing the rabbit when it runs away.
    Thanks.

    Thanks, Jeff.
    I just found that out the hard way trying to troubleshoot someone's problems on the phone.
    Seems you have to locate the ...\Adobe\Premiere Pro\3.0 folder in your user area and delete/change the name of the 3.0 folder nowadays to restart the many individual files that hold all the preferences nowadays.
    Looks like a useful folder to which to create a shortcut on the desktop to save having to keep looking for it if you have problems.
    For Tom: I guess it's the same with CS3, but with earlier versions the Preferences files were not replaced by a re-install of the program (nor deleted by the uninstall). Logic being that they are created if not there - so if they are there already the old ones are re-used. So you do need to deal with the preferences files to sort corruptions to the user interface or whatever, and a reinstall is unlikely to fix the problem.

  • Automate to sequence without transitions?

    I am using stills in a bin and I rearrange the order of them and then use automate to sequence though it keeps adding transitions between the images, and maybe I'm missing the option to turn this off, though I do not see it. Working in cs6, thanks in advance.

  • Automate to sequence audio tracks bug.

    Hi.
    When you select clips that contain 4 audio tracks, to apply "automate to sequence", only track 1 is added to the timeline. Please, can you fix?
    Regards.

    I think it is important to resolve this because I used to put multiple clips on the timeline, with the overlay option "x" frames and apply audio transition.

  • Audio track does not appear using Automate To Sequence

    When I use the Automate to Sequence feature after arranging clips in a Bin, none of the associated audio files show up in Audio 1 but the video clips do show up in Video 1. When I do this on other computers it works fine. (This is a classroom setting.)

    Start reading on mono and stereo tracks and project setup.

  • Automate to sequence - not on lowest track

    When I import a composition to Premiere Pro it seems the only way to move it to the timeline is to "automate to sequence". My issue is, the Automate to Sequence automatically drops it on the lowest video track number no matter what track I have selected. Any way to change this?

    By design, Automate to Sequence will target the lowest available video and audio tracks. You could lock the tracks you do not want it to automate to. e.g.: if you wanted to automate to track 3, then you would lock tracks 1 & 2. Hope this helps.

  • Separate automatic document sequence numbering for diff. branches

    Hi,
    The client wants to have different automatic document sequence numbering for its various branches.preferably the sequence will start from a prefix depicting a branch and sequential vouchers will be generated. in this way all the branches will have their vouchers in sequence. tracking and filling will become easier.
    if sombody knows the way of doing it, please respond.
    null

    Hi
    By using Document sequencing, you can do this have separate document sequence numbers for each bank, each branch with a code.
    Please contact for further details.
    Thanks
    bharat

  • Automate To Sequence - "Placement" box do not open "unnumbered markers" option

    Hi all,
    I tried to place photos in a Sequence automatically by pressing
    the Automate To Sequence button .
    I want to place the photos at the unnumbered sequence markers that I had already marked .
    the problem is that the "Placement" box do not open this option.
    It opens only the "Sequentially" option.
    I have used this feature before in PPRO 2.0 and it was OK then.
    Please help,
    Miky

    Here's a suggestion from a user named Jusko that worked for me:
    Delete the pref file --- C:\Users\user id\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Premiere Pro\3.0\Adobe Premiere Pro Prefs
    then, the "At Unnumbered Markers" option will appear again.
    On my PC the file path is:
    C:\Documents and Settings\Sid\Application Data\Adobe\Premiere Pro\3.0\Adobe Premiere Pro Prefs
    Meanwhile, in case I run into this again, I've copied my latest good config file so I can fall back on it after deleting the corrupted one.
    Something else that works is to log in as a different user. Either way, you will need to update your preferences (path to scratch files, etc.)
    Here's a link to another discussion of the same problem:
    Sid Roberts, "Placement "At Unnumbered Markers" disappeared" #6, 5 Jun 2008 9:40 am
    Hope this helps,
    Sid

  • Automatically creating sequence diagram.

    Hi,
    Is there any way to create UML sequence diagram automatically from the existing java code? I am using jdeveloper 11.1.2.2.0. I know this feature is there in older versions, debug->debug with diagram. How can I achieve that in this version?
    Regards,
    Infy

    HI Shay,
    Thanks for your reply. Is there possibilities to create activity diagram from existing code in 11g?
    Regards,
    Infy

  • When I automate to sequence I get no audio transitions.

    I am working with clips from my Sony PMW-200. When I automate a bunch of clips to sequence the video transitions are there, but no audio transitions. I have been using Premiere Pro for years and this has never happened to me before.

    When Premiere is acting weird: reboot computer then hold down shift+alt while opening Premiere.
    See if that will help.

  • Automatic update sequence files

    Hi all,
    we have a simple step type, which will be usen in some hundreds of small sequence files.
    We have changed the step type, as we added some variables, and in the Specify Module dialog we have defined the variabla-table new.
    Now we want to update all the sequence files automatic. In the "Tools menu -> Update sequence files" there is a possibility, but it adds only the new variables to each instance of the step type, and doesn´t update the table, which we changed in the Specify Module tabe in the step type editor. If we open the updated file again, and go to Specify Module on an instance of the step type, we get the message "The prototype of the VI changed. The parameter information wil be updated to reflect the new prototype." 
    But the changes, what we have done in the Step Type editor, are not done to the instance.
    The question is: how to update the step types?
    regards
    MB

    Best way ist search for StepTypes Parameter in whole sequence (file(s)) and then set it explicit e.g. with Statement (see Screenshot)
    RunState.Sequence.Main["Action"].TS.SData.ViCall.Parms 
    e.g. RunState.Sequence.Main["Action"].TS.SData.ViCall.Parms["Sequence Context"].ArgVal="Locals.Test123"
    Attachments:
    TSstatementTypes.doc ‏152 KB

  • No at unnumbered marker option in automate to sequence

    I have unumbered markers on my sequence and I am trying to automate my bin to the unnumbered markers but it does not have that option available for me. Does anyone know why that is? I am using adobe premiere cs3 on vista.

    Please provide
    these details to help us help you.
    Cheers
    Eddie
    PremiereProPedia   (
    RSS feed)
    - Over 300 frequently answered questions
    - Over 250 free tutorials
    - Maintained by editors like
    you
    Forum FAQ

  • How to have diffenrent automatic number sequences for diff OU projects ?

    Client requirement is to have different project numbr sequence for diff OU's in the same BG . How can this be implemented?

    Hi,
    The Project number has to be unique across the OUs. But Iam not sure how you will achieve it. Since having different sequence numbers will cause issues(it will create overlapping project numbers and hence you will not be able to create a project)
    But technically it is doable. The way is given below. But it may cause issues in having project number to be unique across OUs.
    1. Make the Project Number 'Manual' for all OUs.
    2. Create one sequence for each OU.
    3. When creating Project through Forms/OAF, use custom code to populate the project number automatically
    by accessing the correct sequence, depending upon the OU.
    This is just a thought. Let me know if this works.
    Have fun !!
    Sathish
    www.projectsaccounting.com

  • Automatically insert sequence call by defined subsequences

    Good morning,
    is it possible, with TestStand 2012, to create a sequence call (automatically) in MainSequence for each defined SubSequence in the same sequence-file?
    I have many (as more as 120) tests which are applied as a SubSequence. these Subsequences get called from MainSequence. Now I have to set for every SubSequence a sequence call, this take much time.
    My idea is to write a script or a helper sequence which do this job for me, is this possible?
    thanks
    Heiko

    You can use this statement instead...(slightly different than the previous one...and more readable according to me)
    RunState.SequenceFile.Data.Seq[Locals.index].InsertStep(RunState.Sequence.GetStep(0, StepGroup_Setup), 0, StepGroup_Main)
    A few explanations :
    > Locals.index : local variable to index each subsequence in your sequence file
    > InsertStep : method to insert the step you specify into the subsequence (with options in order to specify where you want to insert the step in your subsequence : group, and position in the group)
    > GetStep : method to get a reference to the step you need to insert in the subsequence (with options in order to specify which step of your main sequence you want to get a reference to : group, and position in the group)

Maybe you are looking for