Subsequent Debit/Credit for Freight Costs

Is it possible to configure additional indicators for subsequent debit/credit specifically to capture freight costs that would then flow those costs down to the material? What is the proper process for this activity?

Hello
For subsequent cost accounting, the Process Trip Cost Accounting could be helpful.
Check the link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/b7/c44bc19d5411d189b60000e829fbbd/content.htm
Reg
Suresh

Similar Messages

MIRO- Document number already exists on Subsequent Debit/Credit for 3rd pty

We have problem in invoicing a third party Purchase order, we get the message as " Document -<SD invoice> already assigned".
Error: F5152
Our Flow is: SO created-- PO Created--MIGO MIRO VF01.
Now the Vendor sends a Debit/Credit for the same PO.
While posting a vendor invoice in MIRO for subsequent Dr/Cr, the system(FI_DOCUMENT_NUMBER_CHECK) checks the number range of already invoiced SD document# and we get the error message " Document -<SD invoice> already assigned".
I checked the other question posted for this but did not see the solution.
Nimit

Please dont cross post in different forums per forum rules.
As mentioned in the other forum check OSS Note 414742 - Error F5 512 during the billing document update.
Regards,

Regarding Subsequent debit,credit and cdedit memos

Hello Gurus,
Could any body explain the above said subject and when this scenario will be used pls give some examples.
regards
rk

Hi,
A subsequent debit/credit arises if a transaction has already been settled, and a further invoice or credit memo is received afterwards.
A subsequent debit/credit changes the total invoice value of a purchase order item; the total invoice quantity remains unchanged. Therefore, only a value-based update of the purchasing transaction takes place. There is no quantity-based
update.
1. Subsequent Debit :-You must enter an invoice as a subsequent debit if a purchase order item has already been invoiced and further costs are now incurred. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too low a price and then sends a
second invoice for the difference.)
2. Subsequent Credit :- You must enter a credit memo as a subsequent credit if a purchase order item was invoiced at too high a price and you have now received a credit memo. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too high a price and then sends a credit memo for the difference.)
If you enter a subsequent debit/credit, the system suggests the entire invoiced quantity, but no value. The maximum quantity that you can subsequently debit or credit is the quantity that has already been invoiced. You can only enter a subsequent debit/credit for a purchase order item if an invoice has already been posted for this item.
A subsequent debit/credit cannot refer to a particular invoice.
Subsequent debits and credits are listed separately in the PO history.
3. Credit Memo :- You usually receive a credit memo from a vendor if you were overcharged. As is the case for invoices, credit memos refer to purchase orders or goods receipts.
You post a credit memo if too large an amount has been invoiced. When you post the credit memo, the total invoiced quantity in the PO history is reduced by the credit memo quantity. The maximum quantity you can make a credit for is the quantity that has already been invoiced.
In the same way as the corresponding goods receipt is expected or posted for the invoice, in the case of a credit memo, the system assumes that the credit memo belongs to a return delivery or reversal of the goods receipt. This means that the credit memo is settled using the GR/IR clearing account.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Miro debit/credit note and subsequent debit/credit

Dear all,
May I know under what circumstances we use debit/credit note and
under what circumstances we use subsequent debit/credit
Need advice.
Thanks

Hi,
A subsequent debit/credit arises if a transaction has already been settled, and a further invoice or credit memo is received afterwards.
A subsequent debit/credit changes the total invoice value of a purchase order item; the total invoice quantity remains unchanged. Therefore, only a value-based update of the purchasing transaction takes place. There is no quantity-based
update.
1. Subsequent Debit :-You must enter an invoice as a subsequent debit if a purchase order item has already been invoiced and further costs are now incurred. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too low a price and then sends a
second invoice for the difference.)
2. Subsequent Credit :- You must enter a credit memo as a subsequent credit if a purchase order item was invoiced at too high a price and you have now received a credit memo. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too high a price and then sends a credit memo for the difference.)
If you enter a subsequent debit/credit, the system suggests the entire invoiced quantity, but no value. The maximum quantity that you can subsequently debit or credit is the quantity that has already been invoiced. You can only enter a subsequent debit/credit for a purchase order item if an invoice has already been posted for this item.
A subsequent debit/credit cannot refer to a particular invoice.
Subsequent debits and credits are listed separately in the PO history.
3. Credit Memo :- You usually receive a credit memo from a vendor if you were overcharged. As is the case for invoices, credit memos refer to purchase orders or goods receipts.
You post a credit memo if too large an amount has been invoiced. When you post the credit memo, the total invoiced quantity in the PO history is reduced by the credit memo quantity. The maximum quantity you can make a credit for is the quantity that has already been invoiced.
In the same way as the corresponding goods receipt is expected or posted for the invoice, in the case of a credit memo, the system assumes that the credit memo belongs to a return delivery or reversal of the goods receipt. This means that the credit memo is settled using the GR/IR clearing account.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Subsequent debit, credit and credit memo

Hi,
what is the difference between subsequent debit, credit and credit memo in MIRO transaction.
In case of vendor had given us credit note with relevant to particular for which we had already completed the invoice verification and payment also paid.
in this case what document should i use i.e crdit memo, subsequent credit memo or subsequent debit memo??
plz suggest

Hi
You need to use a credit memo.
Subsequent debit is used if you have already invoiced
You have already received an invoice from your vendor for all the goods received. Subsequently, freight costs are to be taken into account, however, the invoice quantity remains the same.
Subsequent credit is used if you already have done a credit memo on the PO
You have already received a credit memo from your vendor for all the goods received. Subsequently, freight costs are to be credited to your company, however, the credit memo quantity remains the same.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Billing Document Subsequent debit/ credit:

Dear SAP Experts,
I am in search of the Document type (Sales) , though which there can be subsequent debit credit to the billing document (Which is already posted to accounting) and the new accounting document should be created with the invoice reference as the Acc. Document of the original billing Doc:
Such as:
BIlling DOc. No : 90666767 (F2)        Accounting Dcou: 22000089789 (RV)
Next Subsequent Credit :   Billing document (F2)
Accounting Document 220056537292 (DZ)    But in the INV. Ref: there should be 22000089789
Please advice.
I have tried the INVOICE Correction Request (RK) But it generates RV doc Type in accounting and Invoice reference is not Present.
Regards,
A S

Dear SAP Consultant,
If, I have understood correctly, This is because,
Accounting Document 220056537292 (DZ) is your Collection-Document (DZ - is Collection Doc.type against Billing Doc. Type - BL) against your BIlling DOc. No : 90666767 (F2)
For Billing Doc-types, Check with: VOFA
Best Regards,
Amit.
Note: I was not clear with your doubt, while replying, so if its not related to your query, Please excuse.

Subsequent debit/credit

Hi,
to all SAP Guru,
Account Postings Made when an Invoice Is Posted as a Subsequent Debit:
PO- 100 Piece @ 10 Rs
GR- 50 Piece
Invoice 70 Piece @ 11 Rs == 770 Rs
Invoice for Rs 105 for 70 Pieces (Subsequent Debit).
At GR:-
Stock Account- 500+
GR/IR Account- 500-
At invoice-
Stock account- 50+
GR/IR account- 720+
Vendor Account- 770-
Subsequent Debit-
Stock Account- 75+
GR/IR Account- 30+
Vendor Account- 105-
So my question is
At Invoice- How stock account Dr.with 50, GR/IR Dr. with 720 Came........
& At Subsequent Debit- How Stock Account Dr.with 75, GR/IR Dr. with 30, came.....
plz sir/mam help me out..bcoz i always get confuse in account posting
And Same plz give me example of Subsequent Credit that how
Account Postings Made when an Invoice Is Posted as a Subsequent Credit:
plz........

At invoice-
Stock account- 50+
GR/IR account- 720+
Vendor Account- 770-
invoice price is 5 rs more than PO price, and you use moving average price so the additional price is hitting inventory account. If you use standard price, 50 will go to PRD account.
Subsequent Debit-
Stock Account- 75+
GR/IR Account- 30+
Vendor Account- 105-
If the quantity of the subsequent debit/credit is larger than the quantity delivered, the system distributes the relevant amount proportionally. The part of the subsequent debit/credit that does not have a goods receipt is posted to the GR/IR clearing account. The remaining amount is posted to the stock account u2013 or in the case of standard price control or insufficient stock coverage u2013 to a price difference account. picked from [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/a8/b99725452b11d189430000e829fbbd/content.htm]
In your case, system proportianately distributes the stock.. i.e 105/75 = 1.5.. you have stock of 50.. 50*1.5 = 75 which goes to stock account and the remaining goes the GR/IR clearing account. subsequent debit value 105 is credited with vendor account.. same happen in subsequent credit in a reverse way.

Price check during subsequent debit & credit

Hi experts,
My client wants a scenario which is enumerated below.
The client requirement is to have a tolerance level check during miro as well as subsequent debit & credit.
For the miro i have taken tolerance key PP: price variance with error message 083 & it is working fine for percenatge toleranace check i.e if the PO is made for 10 rs/unit & i have set upper & lower limit of tolerance of 10% system will not allow to do miro at price of more than 11 rs/unit or less than 9 rs/unit.
The problem i am facing is to activate the same check at the time of subsequent debit & credit i.e if somebody does a miro of 10 rs/unit & then does a subsequent debit to pay another 2 rs to the vendor the system is not giving an error message but actually the vendor is getting 12 rs/unit which is against norm. How do we check this thing so that system does not allow the same.
waiting for reply.

Hi all,
There is a new development. The error message is getting triggered for subsequent debit. That means if i have set a tolerance level of 10%,& initially received the invoice at a 10 rs/unit which is the PO price then system will not allow to do a subsequent debit for another 2 rs/unit ( by effectively making the price 12 rs/unit) as it falls outside the tolerance limit by throwing an error message.
But same error message is not getting effected for subsequent credit i.e after receiving the invoice for 10 rs/unit if i do a subsequent credit for 2 rs/unit then it is falling outside set tolearnce limit of +-10% ( by effectively making the price 8 rs/unit) but the system is not triggering any message.
Any idea whether it is a SAP default, that the message determination will trigger only for subsequent debit & not for subsequent credit.
waitng for reply.

Subsequent Debit/Credit Number Range

Dear Experts,
My client want seperate number range for Subsequent Debit/Credit in MIRO..
how can i can do this .....
Thanx
Neeru

Hi Neeru,
This is impossible in std, but SAP provides the enhancement LMR1M003 for this purpose (trs SMOD/CMOD). The subsequent D/C indicator is provided in the field E_TRBKPV-TBTKZ.
Note however that the flag for subsequent D/C can be set in individual items, even though the whole document is a normal invoice/credit note, field T_DRSEG-TBTKZ.
BR
Raf

Revaluation run (MRNB) v/s Subsequent Debit / Credit (MIRO)

Hello Experts
We are working on ECC 6.0.
I'am aware how to use MRNB & posting subsequent debit / credit note through MIRO.
I want to know when to use MRNB in comparison to Subsequent Debit / Credit?
Suppose vendor has suppiled certain goods at Rs 100 per unit. Invoice have already been posted against the GRs. Now the vendor asks for additional Rs. 2 per unit.
In such a scenario should MRNB or Subsequent credit is to be posted?
I've noticed that when MRNB is used material MAP remains unaffected unlike posting a Subsequent Credit / Debit. Why it remains unaffected during MRNB run? If the material price is changed then its impact should also come on inventory which doesnt happen in MRNB.
For both the cases is excise claiming to be adjusted through J1IH manually ?
Regards
Kapil

Hello,
Subsequent Debit and Credits
After an Invoice is successfully posted and the transaction is completed, Vendor approaches with additional amount invoice or correction in Invoice.You would like to post this additional invoice with reference to the original PO and item. Subsequent Debit / Credit functionality allows you to capture this difference without canceling original invoice.
Please check this link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/a8/b99890452b11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards,
Shailesh

LIV-Subsequent debit/credit

Hi all,
My company would like our users to be able post Invoice and Credit memo using MIRO but not Subsequent debit and credit. Is there a way to make this happen?
Few thoughts that come to mind are:
- Remove Subsequent Debit/Credit transactions from the list - but couldn't find an IMG to do this
- Control access to Subsequent Debit/Dredit transaction via authorization - but can't find auth object
Any advice from you guys?
Thanks in advance.
Aloy

Hi
Try the option of activating IV tolerance control -price variance (OMR6) - subsequent debit/credit will alter the price which can be avoided by invoice tolerance limits.
Thanks

Can't apply AP credit for freight only

It is sometimes necessary to enter an A/P Credit Memo for freight only. This has been doen by entering a service-type credit memo, with nothing in the rows but an amount in the Freight section of the footer. Then this credit memo can be selected along with one or more invoices when creating an outgoing payment. This procedure has worked without any problms in version 2007.
Now the customer is upgrading to 8.81 PL8. When the scenario above is followed, there is an error on the outgoing payment which says "No Record Matching" and references RPC1, the A/P Credit Memo rows. If I populate a row on the credit memo with any GL account and a zero amount, there is no error. We have tested at 8.81 PL9 and also 8.82 PL0, and the error also comes up in those versions.
Is this a bug in the system? There doesn't seem to be any reason why the credit memo should not be accepted in the outgoing payment, regardless of whether it has anything in the rows or not.
Thanks for your help.
Marcia

Thank you both for your replies.
I have checked this issue in several different databases, including the SAP demo, in the different versions referenced above. The results are consistent: there is no error in versions prior to 8.81 PL8, and there is an error from PL8 onward.

How to define routes for freight cost calculation

Hi,
in our company we plan to use LE-TRA Transport with Freight costs calculation. To use Transport it is a must to maintain routes in all sales orders/deliveries. Currently we do not use it and now we have the challenge to define routes and later due to freight costs calculation Stages. There are different solutions for routes. In some other companys we have only routes dependent on the Transit duration, but that's all. They don't use stages and they don't use freight cost calculation in SAP.
As I know routes should describe geographical locations (The way location A till location B). Based on the route we have a defined stage with a distance, shipping type.... That would mean for a company: They need to analyse all delivery channels with different forwarding agents and so on. Is that possible when the forwarding agent is responsible for scheduling? That means for a company with customer around the world thousands of routes?
Alternatively it is possible to create stages in the transport documents. Is that more recommendable? It would be nice, when someone could post his experience with that topic.
Thank you,
Raphael

Hi Luis,
thank you for the response. My problem is not the technical view. I know how to create the routes and what kind of information I need. The problem is to unterstand how this concept can operate in practise in a company with many different customer.
The following site describes the concept of routes in SAP:
http://blog.tkreddy.com/2010/09/17/understanding-the-concept-of-routes-le-shp-in-sap-ecc-6-0/
A company with many delivery plants and customer around the world needs to forward all delivery channels they have to us, A route describes an area and includes stages with location A and B. The stages are assigned to a forwarding agend. Based on that information I can start a freigt cost calculation. The structure of stages and routes also depends on the situation how many different forwarding agents are involved in a delivery process.
In my opinion it is really a big effort to find a reliable solution for the amount of routes and stages. I am thinking about to use the solution to create the stage manually in the transport document and to use the routes to describe the transit time.
Raphael

Subsequent debit function for MRKO settlement

Hi,
We have one business requirement for one of our client,
The business requirement is ERS - Automatic invoice settlement is paid for the amount of Rs 150 for the qty of 10. After the automatic invoice settlement via using t.coe MRRL, We can able to Post the subsequent debit for the for qty of 10 and amount increased of 200 by vendor. Incase of price changed by vendor after settlement through the ERS we can post the excess amount using subsequent debit settled accordingly.
The same requirement is needed for Consignment and Pipeline settlment (MRKO) function also,but however we settled the invoice using MRKO after that in MIRO transaction not able to post the corrosponding subsequent debit.
Any other setting is require to post the subsequent debit for consignment and pipe line?
How to settle the excess amount in case of price change of consignment invoice?
- Regards,
Velu

Hi,
ERS - Automatic invoice settlement is always refer the PO .
so, you can post the Subsequent debit if price increase. because price dertermined from Purchase Order.
But MRKO. the Price determined from Info record.
If the Info record the how can we use subsequent debit option.
also MRKO is the process to intimate to consignment vendor about the cunsumption only. it won't determine any price.
Not possible to use subsequent functionality for MRKO.
SAM
Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jun 23, 2010 3:04 PM

Credit Memo Freight Cost Negative COPA

While posting a credit memo system post to fright cost value field with a negative amount.
The user is asking since no material movement associated in this scenario why its post to the freight cost value field.
Regards
John

Hi Guys,
Any clue.
Does in credit memo system pick the copa value field?
In our case in credit memo billing document system do posts to freight account.
Is it correct?

Subsequent Debit/Credit for Freight Costs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for