Subsequent function '' not possible due to a credit block

Hello Experts,
We have the dynamic credit check at delivery, so while creating the deliery a pop-up message comes with the exceeding credit limit and allows us to save the delivery. After releasing the delivery with VKM5 when we try to enter the picking quantity in Picked Qty column we are getting the error Subsequent function " not possible due to a credit bock. Even though the delivery is released why it is again doing the credit check. How to over come this issue.
Thanks,
Sreehari.

Hi Ravi,
While creating the delivery if we enter both the delivery and picking quantity then it is throwing the error message, now it is being released with VKM5 transaction. In this case there is no second time credit check is happeing while doing PGI.
In case while creating the delivey if we enter only the delivery quantity (not entering pick qty) and save the delivery then also it is shows the delivery is blocking due to credit check. But after releasing it with VKM5, when we enter the pick quantity in the delivery (to do PGI) it again throwing the error message of credit block. The credit check is happening again in picking.
Please let me know how to resolve the issue.
Thanks,
Sreehari.

Similar Messages

Purchase requisition from sales document' not possible due to a credit bloc

hi experts,
i have to confirm delivery date and quantity for some purchase order items but i'm not able because i receive following message:
Subsequent function 'Purchase requisition from sales document' not possible due to a credit block'
Purchase requisition belongs to a sales order which has customer 10000.
The customer 10000 was block from FD32 but now i have unblock the customer from FD32, i have assigned customer to a category risk which is only a warning. (in OVA8 risk category 002 static check, reaction C, status/block uncheck )
There is any possiblilities to confirm quantity ?? I mean ... i understand that sales order was created when the customer was block due to credit limit exceded ... but now the customer is not blocked.
What should i do?
Thank you.

Hi Dan
If you want to confirm the delivery date then change the static check reaction to B . in OVA8 . But if you change the static check reaction to A , you can do Delivery and billing also
Regards
Srinath

Good issue from delivery not possible due to credit block

Hi gurus,
Please help me on this issue.while doing PGI for the delivery i am getting the following error message."Good issue from delivery not possible due to credit block "The simple credit check is assigned for the sales document type.iam doing free of charge delivery.
What are all the possible ways to get such error
Regards
Vis

but system behavior is not set in transaction OVA8, means combination of risk categories and 03 is not set.
I think you are checking the wrong risk category, please check once again the Risk category of the payer in FD32, what is it assigned and also check OVA8 with this risk category.
If you find the above settings are correct as per your observation, try to create a fresh cycle so that you will get the correct results as per your settings in delivery.
In your case what you are saying is correct, may be the risk category is changed recently this you can check the change log of the payer customer in FD32( if any change takes place).
If possible try to past the screen shot of both.
thanks,
srinu.

[SOLVED]wlan0 up - Operation not possible due to RF-kill

Hello everyone.
I've encountered trouble trying to activate my wlan0 interface and I was wishing that someone here might be able to help me.
$ip link
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default
link/loopback
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether
3: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether
My attempt at trying to activate wlan0 renders the following;
$sudo ip link set wlan0 up
RTNETLINK answers: Operation not possible due to RF-kill
Unblocking everything with RF-Kill does not seem to change much in particular:
$rfkill list all
0: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: yes
Hard blocked: no
1: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: yes
Hard blocked: yes
$sudo rfkill unblock all
$rfkill list all
0: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: yes
Hard blocked: no
1: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: yes
Enabling/Disabling the wifi-button on my keyboard only changes the Hard Blocked-parameter of hp-wifi. The Soft block remains unchanged regardless of me trying to unblock all with rfkill.
The following is the output of dmesg | grep phy0
$ dmesg | grep phy0
[ 7.460715] ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rt: Info - RT chipset 5390, rev 0502 detected
[ 7.465387] ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00_set_rf: Info - RF chipset 5390 detected
[ 7.500363] ieee80211 phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'minstrel_ht'
dmesg | grep hp-wifi renders nothing.
Additional Information:
$uname -r
3.12.2-1-ARCH
Entire output of lsmod
Module Size Used by
hid_generic 1161 0
usbhid 40577 0
hid 90678 2 hid_generic,usbhid
arc4 2008 2
rt2800pci 11055 0
rt2800lib 74595 1 rt2800pci
rt2x00pci 2664 1 rt2800pci
rt2x00mmio 2945 1 rt2800pci
rt2x00lib 37807 4 rt2x00pci,rt2800lib,rt2800pci,rt2x00mmio
joydev 9671 0
eeprom_93cx6 2193 1 rt2800pci
mac80211 466554 3 rt2x00lib,rt2x00pci,rt2800lib
cfg80211 412854 2 mac80211,rt2x00lib
uvcvideo 72900 0
kvm_amd 52575 0
videobuf2_vmalloc 3280 1 uvcvideo
videobuf2_memops 2343 1 videobuf2_vmalloc
videobuf2_core 28027 1 uvcvideo
kvm 389125 1 kvm_amd
videodev 111140 2 uvcvideo,videobuf2_core
hp_wmi 7627 0
media 11751 2 uvcvideo,videodev
radeon 1284675 6
sparse_keymap 3154 1 hp_wmi
crc_ccitt 1371 1 rt2800lib
rfkill 15651 2 cfg80211,hp_wmi
r8169 58399 0
microcode 15216 0
evdev 10989 13
mii 4035 1 r8169
pcspkr 2035 0
k10temp 3058 0
psmouse 85428 0
ttm 63411 1 radeon
serio_raw 5049 0
rtsx_pci_ms 7266 0
drm_kms_helper 36286 1 radeon
memstick 7472 1 rtsx_pci_ms
drm 238206 8 ttm,drm_kms_helper,radeon
sp5100_tco 5824 0
thermal 8532 0
battery 6837 0
wmi 8419 1 hp_wmi
i2c_piix4 10592 0
snd_hda_codec_realtek 40772 1
i2c_algo_bit 5399 1 radeon
i2c_core 24164 6 drm,i2c_piix4,drm_kms_helper,i2c_algo_bit,radeon,videodev
ac 3332 0
acpi_cpufreq 10779 0
video 11228 0
snd_hda_intel 36904 0
shpchp 25465 0
button 4677 0
snd_hda_codec 149633 2 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel
snd_hwdep 6340 1 snd_hda_codec
snd_pcm 77709 2 snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_intel
snd_page_alloc 7242 2 snd_pcm,snd_hda_intel
snd_timer 18726 1 snd_pcm
snd 59173 6 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hwdep,snd_timer,snd_pcm,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_intel
soundcore 5450 1 snd
processor 24935 3 acpi_cpufreq
ext4 474187 4
crc16 1367 1 ext4
mbcache 6082 1 ext4
jbd2 83504 1 ext4
sr_mod 14898 0
cdrom 34848 1 sr_mod
sd_mod 30789 6
rtsx_pci_sdmmc 14332 0
mmc_core 95691 1 rtsx_pci_sdmmc
ahci 22896 5
libahci 21401 1 ahci
rtsx_pci 32049 2 rtsx_pci_ms,rtsx_pci_sdmmc
libata 170792 2 ahci,libahci
ehci_pci 4000 0
ohci_pci 4072 0
ohci_hcd 23937 1 ohci_pci
ehci_hcd 59220 1 ehci_pci
usbcore 180136 6 uvcvideo,ohci_hcd,ohci_pci,ehci_hcd,ehci_pci,usbhid
scsi_mod 130669 3 libata,sd_mod,sr_mod
usb_common 1656 1 usbcore
Entire output of lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 14h Processor Root Complex
00:01.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Wrestler [Radeon HD 6320]
00:11.0 SATA controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode]
00:12.0 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller
00:12.2 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller
00:14.0 SMBus: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SBx00 SMBus Controller (rev 42)
00:14.2 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) (rev 40)
00:14.3 ISA bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 LPC host controller (rev 40)
00:14.4 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge (rev 40)
00:14.5 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI2 Controller
00:15.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB700/SB800/SB900 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 0)
00:15.1 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB700/SB800/SB900 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 1)
00:15.3 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB900 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 3)
00:16.0 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller
00:16.2 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller
00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 0 (rev 43)
00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 1
00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 2
00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 3
00:18.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 4
00:18.5 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 6
00:18.6 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 5
00:18.7 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 12h/14h Processor Function 7
02:00.0 Unassigned class [ff00]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTS5209 PCI Express Card Reader (rev 01)
06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev 05)
07:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. RT5390 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R PCIe
It is worth mentioning that this problem has remained persistent throughout multiple linux distributions that I've tried on my laptop. The Wifi works fine in Windows 7 but as soon as I switch to any linux distro it stops working.
I intend to put your advice to good use so any help would be very appreciated.
Last edited by FunkDojo (2013-12-05 13:02:45)

As I can see you have two wireless interaces, when i see only phy0 with rfkill, it's maybe your hp-wifi that force to disable phy0 interace. I think if you blacklist the driver it might allow phy0 to be enabled.
Please download and install lshw available in the community repo and enter in a terminal :
$ lshw -c network
Last edited by maxarsys (2013-12-05 06:26:05)

Mapping for ND_FORM to ND_FORM not possible due to recursion

Hi Experts,
I am trying to define external context mapping...with the steps..say there are two components ZOMP1(in which i am using other component) and ZCOMP2(this is used in zcomp1)
1. IN the component zcomp2 I define ZCOMP1 under the used components
2.in the component controller of ZCOMP2 under properties tab I create controller usage of zcomp1 and two entries are created
3.I go to the context tab of component controller of zcomp2 and drag and drop the ND_FORM node from ZCOMP1 to context node of ZCOMP2
when I do a check I get the error
Mapping for ND_FORM to ND_FORM not possible due to recursion
Don't understand why am I getting this error though the node I am trying to map is not recursive?
This is what I see in long text of error:
Message no. SWDP_WB_TOOL263
Diagnosis
Mapping from ND_FORM to ND_FORM is not permitted, as ND_FORM has its own mapping that refers directly or indirectly to ND_FORM.
System Response
The mapping can neither be created nor used.
Procedure
If you receive this error message when you check a context or when you update the mapping to context node ND_FORM, delete the mapping to ND_FORM using the context menu function with the same name.
Please help,
Anubhav

Hi Anubhav,
following restrictions apply on recursion nodes:
1. You cannot nominate a recursive node to act as the data source in a context mapping relationship. Recursive node structures are restricted to the scope of a single controller.
2. The root node of a context cannot be used for a recursion.
Please check this...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/47/45641e80f81962e10000000a114a6b/content.htm
Also Cehck This,..
Enhancement FPM of Trip application
Cheers,
Kris.

The first boot of iphone 5 is not possible due to lack of battery charge , it happened after charging, is there s any issue of battery life

the first boot of iphone 5 is not possible due to lack of battery charge , it happened after charging, is there s any issue of battery life

Charge the phone for 15 minutes with the Apple charger. Then hold the HOME and SLEEP buttons at the same time until an Apple logo appears.

Functions not possible because of transfer to OLTP system

Hi gurus,
when i am doing /SAPAPO/VERMER, getting error like "functions not possible because of transfer to OLTP system" can you suggest me and elaboratly.
Thx
moon

turn off transfer to OLTP for both SNP and Deployment via SDP110.

Error Message: Change of update mode not possible due to open V3 update

Hi Gurus,
I got error message when i change update mode (LBWE) from V3 to Direct or Queued delta method.
Error Message: Change of update mode not possible due to open V3 update
Long text: You are not allowed to change the update mode for application 11 from V3 to another method. This is because there are still V3 update entries for update module MCEX_UPDATE_11 that have not been processed yet.
Pls anyone give solution for this.
Thanks
Muthu

Hi Sreeni,
i did check in all the below Tcode as you adviced.
1. Clear all record at SM13, LBWQ / SMQ1, Setup tables, RSA7 for particular datsasource or application..
2. For LBWQ provide date range and delete not required records.
I did not get the 3rd point " Need to clear in CLINTS of R/3 system" of your reply.
what does that mean?
I checked all the above tcodes and got the same message as no queue or data exists".
I went SBIW tcode and activated my data source and try to change the Update mode but still it is throwing error message as "Change of update is not possible due to open V3"
Please help me out.
It will be very helpful for me if you could share steps or docs regarding this issue.
Thanks,
Shailaja

Activation is not possible due to warnings (Partner Assignment)

Hi,
While activating a contract getting an error "Activation is not possible due to warnings (Partner Assignment)"
Thanks and Regards
Srihari

Hi all
Just had an upgrade and I am experiencing the same problem: Message no. RECN027
Activation is not possible due to warnings (Partner Assignment) when trying to activate the Contract in RECN.
Where in the Business Partner do I change the validation of the partner please
Thanks in advance
Gavin

EHP4 installed but "DSD is not active - function not possible"

Dear Gurus,
        In IDES ERP6 EHP4, it have "SAP Menu -> Logistics -> Logistics Execution -> Direct Store Delivery" menu.
        But DEV ERP6 EHP4, it don't have above menu.
        When I run t-code "/n/DSD/VC_VP", it error "DSD is not active - function not possible"
                   Note Message no. /DSD/VC_MESSAGE001
        How to activate DSD on ERP6 EHP4?
        Please advice.
Best regards,
Choosak B.

Hi,
       Thank you for your response.
       Now, I can activate DSD with SPRO -> Activate Business Functions -> ENTERPRISE_BUSINESS_FUNCTIONS -> /DSD/BF
Best regards,
Choosak B.

Error: Item(s) was/were not activated due to online payment block

Hi,
I have an issue with F-58 transaction.
When i try processing an open line item of the vendor (in F-58) i get an error "1 item(s) was/were not activated due to online payment block".
Please advise as to how i can locate the issue.
Thanks,
Safi

Before that try transaction code MRBR. This should help you in releasing the documents.
Else
There must have been a workflow that has been developed for the removal of the payment blocks. Please check up if there is a workflow, it woould have triggered a mail in the SAP inbox to a user. This user will have to release the payment block and you should be able to make the payment. Else you would have to change the configuration and make the field editable and then you will be able to remove the payment block. Until you remove the payment block you would not be able to complete the transaction in F-58.
Karthik
Edited by: Karthik Coneru on Sep 17, 2008 12:12 PM

Qty update not active, function not possible error in MIGO

Dear all,
User faces , u201Cqty update not active, function not possibleu201D error in MIGO.
The receipt is for an STO and the material is split valuated. Qty and value updation is active and already similar receipt has been done for many qty.
Throw some light on this
Regards,
Antony

Hi Antony,
Was the material type for the material changed recently? Pls. check the same.
If the qty update is active for the receiving plant & material type, then there should not be any issue.
Regards
Prabhu S

Sales Orders not flowing in COPA if Credit block is set

We are implementing COPA for reporting in BW. The Billing information is flowing well in COPA. However, we have one issue with Sales Orders. Here is the scenario:
When we create a new Sales Order without any credit blocks, the information is flowing to COPA Tables in R/3. However, if the Sales Order is blocked for Credit reasons, then the Sales Order information is not available in COPA. The moment the Credit block is released we are able to see the info in COPA Tables.
The requirement is to have the Sales Order information availabe in COPA no matter what. Is there a way via which we can make the Sales Order info flow in COPA the moment it is created, no matter it has any blocks.
Any info on this is highly appriciated.
Thanks
Srini

Hi,
I think it is a standard behaviour of Co-PA.Refer the note: 139725
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Credit management not updated for the first credit blocked order only

Hi experts,
Pls help to solve. Thx.
Case: The first sales order is created against credit block because the credit limit is exceeded. In FD33, no credit data related to the first order indicates, i.e. credit limit used shows zero as well as sales value, credit exposure. In VKM1, the blocked order can be captured.
As long as the second order is created, the credit management can be updated. But, it still does not capture the data from the first order.
The sales orders I test have the same delivery date.
Questions:
1. Is the standard behavior for the dynamic credit check?
2. If not, how to make credit management consider the first order data?
PS. In OVA8, update 000012 is applied while horizon is 4 months.

Hello Jonathan,
After testing, I found credit management can consider the first order data if using 000018 only. Why 000012 cannot consider it?
I have checked the explanation for those two update groups by F4. I feel obscure about the explanation of sales order between them (see below).
000012:
Sales order
Increases open order value from delivery-relevant schedule lines
000018:
Sales order
Increases open delivery value
By the way, my testing data as below:
1. were the two sales orders of the same document type? Answer: yes. Same document type, same customer, same delivery date, etc.
2. were the item categories the same? if not, was one not relevant for credit check? Answer: Yes, the same.
3. did the documents have the same value? if the second order had a lower value and was not blocked for credit, the exposure will be updated. Answer: yes, credit management can consider the second order data ONLY. It seems the first order have not been created if checking credit management.

Year end close not possible due to negative values in AUC

When I raun the transaction AJAB I am getting an error -Depreciation /update of values has errors for AUC 4000253 . Further analysis of the problem:
Diagnosis
+The depreciation values for asset 000004000253-0000 in company code 9000 were not calculated completely and correctly.+
System Response
The year-end closing cannot be carried out for company code 9000.
Procedure
Recalculate depreciation for the asset.
You can recalculate depreciation in the 'Change asset master record' transaction by choosing the menu option 'Edit' -> 'Recalculate values.'
The system then either completely recalculates depreciation for this asset, or provides a detailed error message explaining the error.
I have done everything possible as per this error analysis but its not working. Kindly note that the AUC was previously settled from an internal order but during the course of the year, internal orders were discontinued and we now use PS/IM.
Please help!!!

Hi,
For detail click on the this link:
Re: Credit to AuC
This will solve your problem.
Regards
Javed

Subsequent function '' not possible due to a credit block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for