Substituion rules from UWL - nor working

Hi experts,
i have the following scenario:
employee 1 send his/her leave request to his/her manager (manager 1 lets say).
now that one is out of office (doesn't matter for what reasons) but has made a substitution rule "Fill in for ME" to another manager (manager 2 let's say).
Both receive the workitem and in theory manager 2 should be able to procces it. But in my case, manager 2 can see the workitem but after he clicks on it in order to process it the LeaveRequestApprover application is displaying the table empty. No leave request...
So i'm not sure what could be wrong...
Could be limitations coming from OM structure?
Any hints are more then welcome!
thanks in advance,
eugen

Hi,
By default the router is not filtering traffic from LAN to WAN.
The issue you are facing will need further investigation of the configuration of the router. Capture traffic can also help understanding what is happening. I would advise you to contact the technical support, so an engineer can have a look at it.
Hereby the contacts: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/web/tsd-cisco-small-business-support-center-contacts.html
Regards,
Kremena

Similar Messages

Getting Connection error while creating Substituion Rule in UWL

Hi Everybody,
Getting below error while creating Substitution Rules in UWL.
"error for the u201Cconnectionu201D to SAP_R3_Finance ".
Can be able to see all Work Items belongs to me. getting the errror while creating Substitution Rule only..
Could anybody tell me what might be the Reason what steps i need to take to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Naveen Kumar

Hi Uds,
are you running SOA Suite on a Linux server and not on your PC and just running JDeveloper on your PC?
If so try creating the repository file specifying a directory on the Linux server.
For example to:
/tmp/sample_repository
So Choose 'File' from drop down menu
Enter /tmp/sample_repository
Click on create button
This should create the file called sample_repository in /tmp on the Linux server.
Can you tell us what your environment is?
Regards Cel

"Old" update rule from ODS not working

Hi Gurus,
I need to set up the "old" fashioned update rule to load data from an ODS1 to another ODS2.
The thing is that I need to set up an update rule because I need to implement a Return Table Routine that is not supported (as far as I know) by the new Transformation/DTP.
When I select option (through the right mouse click over ODS1) "Other Options" - "Create Update Rule" it takes me out of the RSA1 and leaves me in the main menu making it impossible to create a new update rule.
The strange thing is that I have this working from and ODS to an InfoCube.....
Suggestions, a workaround??
Andrea.

Hi Jerry,
Just to confirm that this is not working. The tys_TG_1 structure only shows me the target infoprovider structure. Check that in the how to, to be able to derive employee first you need to assign eache source_filed to the result_field leaving employee blank.
I need to have in the same place, the source_field structure (source infoprovider field structure) and the result_field structure (target infoprovider structure). That is what the "old" return table gives me as in the same place I can have the communication_structure (source infoprovider field structure) with the return_table structure (target infoprovider structure).
Just to understand, in the source infoprovider I have 12 Key Figures (1 for each period) and I have to split each incoming record to 12 records. If I work only with the result_field structure tys_TG_1 and the result_package tyt_TG_1 I'm not able the see those 12 KF.
So... return table functionality is not fully supported by BW 7 as far as I know.
Any other ideas why I'm not able to create the old Update Rules from an ODS?
Regards,
Andrea.

Payroll function to read workschedule rule from IT0007 in schema

Hi Experts,
My client have a requirement, where they need to query work schedule rule from IT0007 ( if work schedule rule = tpwsr6) and if they maintain 1240 allowance wage type in IT0014 then payroll has to process in PC00_M40_CALC.
If WSR is not equal to tpwsr6 and if they maintain the wage type 1240 in IT0014, they payroll process has to stop for the respective employee.
Would appreciate a prompt reply...
Thanks

Hi Salman,
In this case maintain feature SCHKZ...
go to pe03. and enter SCHKZ..
And work schedule rule as tpwsr6..
This should sort your issue..
Regards,
Veeram

How to import Mail rules from Lion to Mavericks?

I tried importing my several dozen rules from OS X 10.7.5 to Mavericks 10.9.4. I tried the method described by SECollins7 here:
Import Lion Mail rules into Mavericks Mail?
It did not work. Nor does manually copying the text from «MessageRules.plist» to «SyncedRules.plist». They just do not appear in the rules settings in Mail in Mavericks.
Is there a way to import rules anyway?
Thanks for any hints!

This issue is caused by a combination of two things:
The file used in previous versions of OS X to store local (not iCloud-based) Mail rules is not used in Mavericks.
The migration process doesn't transfer the rules from the old file to the new one, which has a different format.
You may be able to recover the Mail rules by taking the steps below.
Warning: Do not use this procedure if you synchronize Mail rules with other devices via iCloud.
Quit Mail if it's running.
Back up all data.
Triple-click anywhere in the line below on this page to select it:
cd Library/Mail/V2/MailData; /usr/libexec/PlistBuddy -x -c 'Print :rules' MessageRules.plist > SyncedRules.plist
Copy the selected text to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C.
Launch the Terminal application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Terminal in the icon grid.
Paste into the Terminal window by pressing the key combination command-V. I've tested these instructions only with the Safari web browser. If you use another browser, you may have to press the return key after pasting.
Wait for a new line ending in a dollar sign (“$”) to appear. You can then quit Terminal. Test.

Interesting - Different views when creating substitute rule in UWL and normal view

Hi Guys,
Just came across something interesting i thought i should mentioned it here incase someone knows why. When creating the substitute rule on the MSS main page one gets the window without a small road map, however if you do that via the UWL menu you get a nice view with a road map.
From the main page when you click on the create rule button you get this
=>
From the UWL side menu you get this, but the button being clicked is teh same. Anyone know how this works and how to make it the same ?

Moderator Spotlight - Siddharth Rajora Thank you very much for your reply. So just to clarify a few things
Is it possible at all to have the road map when creating substitution rules from the main MSS lane/manager view on the main page? I am on Webdynpro ABAP. If so can you please help with the steps.
I am right in saying that the road map view in UWL is based on WEBDYNPRO JAVA?
We are currently on ECC6 EH6, would i be correct to tell the boss that road map will is not available in EHP7
Basically the boss would like the road map from the main MSS lane/Launch pad. Thats what he prefers. I have tried to identify the application that is used to display the road map but i cant find it, it looks like its not WEBDYNPRO ABAP. In UWL view When I right click on th button i do not get the technical help to see the application which is what i normally do and it works on the launch pad/MSS lane

Error in opening Workitems from UWL

Hi All,
I am trying to open a transaction from the workflow using a dialog task.
when i execute the workitem from SAP business workplace the task gets execute properly.
but when i try to run the same task from UWL it opens the SAP easy access screen.
All my other workitem like leave request approver are getting opened properly from UWL.
This might be related to some UWL configuration. I searched all the forums there are many similar questions but could not get any answer.
Regards,
Umesh Chaudhari.

Hi ,
please find the following solution .it will definitely work .
If you leave configuration is done.
There was an incorrect data in your system. To do these please follow following process.
delete this request using
PTARQ> Delete documents (RPTARQDBDEl)
Please read the report documentation before
deleting the request but it should be safe as it is
a development system.
Please delete this with the above information or delete all
the records for the approver.
After this,, there will be some incorrect workitem in approver inbox.
You need to clear that also by Tcode - SWWL.
Also try following
Can you check if the Pernr used
has correct information like It0105 etc, also the rules are
correctly defined.
For the Employee, First of all check the Period Work Schedule also
the Quotas of the pernr needs to maintained in 2006, Please do
this customisation and it should solve the issue.
Maintain the absence quota in the IT2006 and then try once.
Also make sure that the Settings in Webmo and PTARQ etc all is done
The pernr belongs to the a Rule and have absences defined for him.

Can I migrate rules from one account in Mail to another?

In mail I have 90 rules, many multi line criteria. I have just created a new imap account linked to fastmail. My rules wont run because they seem to be linked to my first account, not imap. I tried just duplicating them and re-mapping to the new "move to" folder. Wouldn't run. Added a new criteria for the account but then all mail will go to that folder since 90 rules include that account in the rule. This would work if there was 2 levels of logic in the IF command but alas its only IF ANY/ALL.
I really don't want to re-write all my rules as some have maybe 10 lines of criteria in them. Any suggestions?

Transferring files from one User Account to another

Transfering mail rules from Lion to Yosemite.

Help please, how do you transfer mail rules from Apple Mail 5.3 in Lion to 8.0 in Yosemite. Thanks

The file in question that you are looking for is SyncedRules.plist in the MailData folder. I tried re-naming a MessageRules.plist file and it didn't work. It would be an arduous task, but the best suggestion that I have, other than to re-create your rules, is to use a texteditor like SubEthaEdit to make the format of MessageRules comply with the format of SyncedRules.plist. I haven't tried it myself, but it might work. Best of luck!!!

Issue while accessing Approve Clockin/Clockout corrections from UWL

Hi All,
We are not able to access approve clockin/clockout correction application from UWL.
We found one Note - 1600953 and implemented but still we are facing issue.
Request_id value is passed as Null in the URL.
Please find the URL and XML below :
URL:
https://Hostname:port/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/pcd!3aportal_content!2fevery_user!2fgeneral!2fdefaultAjaxframeworkContent!2fcom.sap.portal.standalonecontentarea?NavigationTarget=OBN%3A%2F%2FBOTechnicalName%3Demployee%2FOperation%3Dapprovecorrections%2FBOSystemAlias%3DSAP_ERP_HumanResources&DynamicParameter=FROM_POWL%3DX%26Operation%3Dapprovecorrections%26BOTechnicalName%3Demployee%26REQUEST_ID%3Dnull%26BOSystemAlias%3DSAP_ERP_HumanResources&PrevNavTarget=navurl%3A%2F%2Fc3d9aa78324902a8e37ccfd1581ea857&sap-obn-url=OBN%3A%2F%2FBOTechnicalName%3Demployee%2FOperation%3Dapprovecorrections%2FBOSystemAlias%3DSAP_ERP_HumanResources&NavMode=1&CurrentWindowId=WID1401688105969
XML:
<ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.TS91000330.SAP_ECC_HumanResources" connector="WebFlowConnector"
defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="defaultAction" executionMode="default">
      <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="SAP_ECC_HumanResources" externalType="TS91000330" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
       <CustomAttributes>
        <CustomAttributeSource id="WEBFLOW_CONTAINER" objectIdHolder="externalObjectId"
objectType="WebflowContainer" cacheValidity="final">
          <Attribute name="REQUEST_ID" type="string" displayName="Request ID"/>
        </CustomAttributeSource>
      </CustomAttributes>
      <Actions>
        <Action name="defaultAction" groupAction="" handler="ObjectNavigationLauncher"
returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="yes">
          <Properties>
    <Property name="Operation" value="approvecorrections"/>
        <Property name="ObjectValue" value="REQUEST_ID=${item.REQUESTID}&FROM_POWL=X"/>
             <Property name="DynamicParameter" value="REQUEST_ID=${item.REQUESTID}&FROM_POWL=X"/>
            <Property name="ObjectName" value="employee"/>
<Property name="WebDynproApplication" value="HRMSS_A_CICO_APPR"/>
<Property name="WebDynproNamespace" value="sap"/>
<Property name="System" value="SAP_ERP_HumanResources"/>
    <Property name="openInNewWindow" value="true"/>
          </Properties>
          <Descriptions default="defaultAction"/>
        </Action>
      </Actions>
    </ItemType>
Please help.
Thanks,
Ravi.

Hi All,
This is resolved.
Issue was from WF approver task, in that Request id is not binded to correct Container element,.
After doing the correct binding it is working,
Thanks,
Ravi

Error while copy of Update Rules from ODS 0SD_O03 to InfoCube 0SD_C13

Hi all,
I work on a NW04s SPS9 System I would like to simply copy Update Rules (from an ODS to an InfoCube) from the BCT to the 1:1 Z-Copies of these Objects.
To do so, I copied the InfoProviders 0SD_O03 and 0SD_C13 to Z-Versions. In SAP BCT the InfoCube is updated from the ODS. The ODS itself is updated from InfoSource.
After successfully copying the two InfoProviders as next step I tried to copy the Update Rules from the Content version Objects to the Z-Version Objects to link them.
Similar to copying update rules in 3.5 I tried
- right click on "ZSD_C13"
- choose Additional Functions - Create Update Rules"
- choose DataSource: ODS Object "ZSD_O03"
- choose Copy from: InfoCube "0SD_C13"
This result in the error "0SD_C13 is not suitable as a template for copying update rules".
Some hints that might help:
1. The very same error occurs if I try to copy the Update Rules from 0SD_O03 to 0SD_C13.
2. I also tried to copy both Update Rules (to C12 & C13) on a BW 3.5 system where it worked fine: The update rules from both Z-ODSs to both Z-Cubes were copied correctly 1:1 and without any errors.
3. In the NW04s System I was able to copy the Update Rules from the InfoSource 2LIS_11_VAITM to 0SD_O01 (as well as from 2LIS_11_VAHDR to ODS 0SD_O03). So I only cannot copy Update Rules from ODSs to InfoCubes while it is possible to copy Update Rules from InfoSources to ODSs.
4. During copy of 0SD_O03 the system warned: "InfoObject 0FISCVARNT needs to be in key for DataStore object ZSD_O03". No matter whether I move this IO to the keys of the Z-ODS, the Update Rules copy does not work.
- This warning does not show up on BW3.5 when I copy the very same ODS. Can anyone explain this?
- This warning is not displayed during the copy of ODS 0SD_O01, just for 0SD_O03.
5. Obviously during a preceding test I actually must have been able to copy the Update Rules for another copy of 0SD_C13 (as I can see the Update Rules in the SAPGUI). I stopped this first test as I was not able to do the Update Rules copy for 0SD_C12.
Yet as of today I cannot copy Update Rules this for both cubes 0SD_C13 as well as 0SD_C12. So yesterday there was no error on copying the Update Rules to InfoCube ZSD_C13, but today there is. To my knowledge nothing has been changed in the System Setup / Customizing in the mean time.
6. For both cubes ZSD_C13 as well as ZSD_C12 it is possible to copy Update Rules that map from the BCT ODS to the Z-InfoCbes. So I can copy Update Rules from 0SD_O03 to ZSD_C13 and from 0SD_O01 to ZSD_C12. This would point in the direction that the copied ODSes are the source of this behavior?
I am not sure whether this is a special NW04s behavior and how to use it correctly so the Update Rules can be copied.
Please could you help on how to copy these Update Rules in NW04s or share your experience if you had similar?
Thanks a lot,
Werner

Hi Vinod,
Check the update rules for the original cube. Are they active? It appears that they contain a formula...check this too.
Hope this helps...

Can only add music with Autofill from Library (not working with playlists)

I can only add music using the Autofill feature and it will only work when the main music library is selected. Autofill does not work when a playlist is selected and I can not add music directly by dragging songs from a library or playlist as described in the owner's manual.
Is there something wrong with iTunes, the iPod or is this user error?

Hi Steve,
You're right it's the same for me.
I don't know as you mentionned whether it is an user error or not but I've got 2 iPods now, one is 60 Go color display (60Go) and the other received yesterday is 2G iPod Shuffle (Clipod). I can't drag songs from 60Go nor to iTunes Library neither to Clipod Music. The autofill function works only from iTunes Library where I've got 5 songs only (new MacPro), somebody knows how to export 60Go music to iTunes Library ?
Thanks,
Peloche
MacPro 2.66, 6GB, 1.7TB; Mini G4, 1.45, 1GB;iPod 60 GB; 30" & 20" ACD; Apple IIC Mac OS X (10.4.8) X1900XT

From-outcome not working

Hi, I have
<navigation-rule>
     <from-view-id>/dys/pages/config/sucks.jsp</from-view-id>
     <navigation-case>
          <description>
          This shit is so buggy it sucks
          </description>
     <from-outcome>done</from-outcome>
     <to-view-id>load.jsp</to-view-id>
     <from-outcome>add</from-outcome>
     <to-view-id>load.jsp</to-view-id>
     </navigation-case>
</navigation-rule>
I have a bean LoaderBean, all of its jsf stuff is working, yet when I call LoaderBean.done which just returns "done"
<h:commandButton id="submit" value="Submit" action="#{LoaderBean.done}"/>
My page doesn't go anywhere.
Can anyone explain what I'm doing wrong?
Also, how is <from-view-id> defined? I can't seem to find a clear definition of what path is required
My url is
http://localhost:33300/dys/jsf/pages/config/sucks.jsp
jsf is the jsf handler mapping.
I've tried so many combinations in <from-view-id> it's driving me crazy
Thanks so much

Maybe I'm missing something, but I've looked those.
Consider this
2 from ids.
<from-view-id>/path1/page0.jsp</from-view-id>
<from-view-id>/path0/page0.jsp</from-view-id>
From the examples you're pointing me to, all I'll ever need is
<from-view-id>/page0.jsp</from-view-id>
Yet they may be very different.
My question is, how do I know how much, if any, of a path is required.
Additionally,
The leading '/' usually implies the root of the "virtual web" yet, my jsf files may be n directories deep.
Thanks again.

Responsibility rules : Agent determination only works after restarting the WF

Hi Experts,
We are facing a very strange issue related to agent determination in one of our custom workflow:
For agent determination we are using a responsibility rule with two parameters "Company code" and "Plant".
The responsibility rule works well and returns the agents for all the company code.
Recently I have added few company codes to this responsibility rule in the same way we used to maintain and simulate it . It returns the correct agent for newly added company codes but at run time the agent determination is getting failed and the WF goes into an error because of it. However when i restart the WF via SWPR it works well and the agent determination works well either.
This is only happening for newly added company codes the old ones agent determination work well at the run-time.
Pls suggest what could cause this problem. If there is a problem in responsibility rule then why it works after restarting from SWPR.
Thanks in advance. The helpful/correct answers will be rewarded.
Regards,
Him

Hi Rick,
Thanks for replying.
1. Can you replicate this problem in the test system?
Yes I could replicate this issue in test system and it works fine there.
2. Is this a true responsibility rule or does e.g. a function module get called?
We have a responsibility where several responsibilities have been added with two parameters "company codes" and "plant". Every responsibility has a POSITION assigned into it and this position contains the related users.
This responsibility rule is getting called in one other rule with FM. Here in this another rule we are calling the responsibility rule by using the standard FM RH_GET_ACTORS to fill the ACTOR_TAB.
I have tried to simulate both the rules and it returned correct agents but failing at run time.
Regards,
Him

PDF not displaying in Portal from UWL : cl_fitv_navigation= navigate_to_object

Hi Experts,
We are using a custom webdynpro application for the approval of expense claim.If I am clicking the link from UWL, a new window is opened and it is showing a blank page and PDF is not displaying in the browser.
I have checked from application level (SE80) and it is working fine,PDF is getting displayed in browser.We have done the UWL re-registration as well.
We have used the class 'cl_fitv_navigation' and method 'navigate_to_object' to display the PDF.
Also I have debugged the same method and could found that the codes are different for calling the application from portal and for using SE80.
Kindly let me know what could be the issues or if I missed any parameters.Also please let me know if I need to check any related R/3 configs and parameters maintained in R/3.
Thanks & Regards,
Arun Narayanan.

Hi Pramod,
We are not using iFrame to display the PDF.
We are using the class and method
CALL METHOD cl_fitv_navigation=>navigate_to_object
    EXPORTING
      component           = l_api_component
      operation           = l_operation
      business_parameters = lt_bo_params.
where ;
l_api_component = wd_comp_controller->wd_get_api( ).
l_operation = 'DisplayForm'.
and
ls_bo_param-key   = 'SAP_FITV_PERSNO'.
ls_bo_param-value = l_pernr.
INSERT ls_bo_param INTO TABLE lt_bo_params.
ls_bo_param-key   = 'SAP_FITV_TRIPNO'.
ls_bo_param-value = l_tripno.
INSERT ls_bo_param INTO TABLE lt_bo_params.
ls_bo_param-key   = 'SAP_FITV_TRIPCMP'.
ls_bo_param-value = ''.
INSERT ls_bo_param INTO TABLE lt_bo_params.
ls_bo_param-key   = 'SAP_FITV_DATASRC'.
ls_bo_param-value = ''.
INSERT ls_bo_param INTO TABLE lt_bo_params.
Regards,
Arun.

Substituion rules from UWL - nor working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for