Substitution for specific subpopulation

Hi,
Is there any method to delegate tasks for a set population (positions or sub org units)?
My customer has an organization, where all managers have an assistant who can be appointed the responsability over a number of employees.
For example, the manager approves the leave requests for employees U, V, W, and the assistant approves the leave requests for employees X, Y, Z.
In the standard substitution method, you can specify the tasks for the substitute, but not for whom he will perform these. It are always all the employees in the org unit.
I know that a standard workaround would be to put the assistant and his assigned employees in a lower org unit, but this will pretty much double the amount of org units in the system, and we're facing a pretty complex org chart already.
Thanks!

Hi,
We're on ECC 6.0.
I've read the blog, but I didn't notice the option to delegate employees, only tasks.
The last chapter says:
"Additionally if you use structural authorization then a new structural profile could be created for substitute users. The profile could be configured with function module HRMSS_SUBST_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT which reads the active substitution rules and determines the root organization units"
But this is what we want to let the manager define himself; choose which employees are delegated to the secretary

Similar Messages

How we can mention varible substitution for diffrent message payloads

Hi,
How we can mention varible substitution for diffrent message payloads,
My sceanrio like following,
According the Outbound idoc message,based on the condition the messages to be split into 9 diffrent files.The sender message may or may not satisfied the condition to one or two messages or all messages.
I done the mapping 1:N multimapping in messagemapping & Interface mapping too.
In reciever file adapter i put the variable substiution like as fallows.
Variable Refrence
Name-- -
Filename -- payload:message_type_1,1,Segment1,1,Segment2,1,Field_1,1
<b>How we can mention variable substitution for remaining messages in the same communication channel.my message type names are diffrent for all 9 messagetypes.</b> Any ideas pl forward..,
When i am testing this scenario,able to processing a one file but the file is not placed in the specified target & gives the follwing error:
'Conversion configuration error: Unknown structure 'ns1:message_type_2' found in document', probably configuration error in file adapter (XML parser error)'.The file is
In this case Idoc data satisfied the one message condition only.
If any ideas & suggestions ..?

Hi Anjan
You could always put the "FileName" and "Directory" names into the Dynamic Configuration using a UDF in the map - possibly using a value mapping table to determine the correct values. Then simply reference "%Directory%" and "%FileName%" in the file adapter. This way you do not have to reference payload variables and you set the names in the map. You will need to tick the box for "use adapter specific message attributes" in the file adapter. you UDF code will look something like
String dir = "/path";
String fil = "filename.txt";
DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration)container.getTransformationParameters().get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey key = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File","Directory");
conf.put(key,dir);
DynamicConfigurationKey key = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File","FileName");
conf.put(key,fil);
- Stephen

FBL3N to BW report for specific GL's

Dear BW Experts,
I want to create report in BW for FBL3N for specific GL's, for open items.
I am done with development.
Report on standard DSO 0FIGL_O02 (0FI_GL_4)...
Simply GL in rows, with filter for open status.
Issue: Balance is not matching from ECC for one GL, because of one document,
which is closed in ECC but in DSO its still open (data is upto date in BW).
Thanks
Arun Purohit

I did re-load but without luck.....
that docment is there in BSAS(closed docs table) table not in BSIS (open docs table)...still ds 0FI_GL_4 shows that item still open....

Problem with roaming for specific apps

Hi :)
I have a problem with my iPhone 4s:
When i use roaming on my iPhone 4s i try to save some money by turning off roaming for specific apps, but one day for ca. 3 weeks ago it stopped working!
Some apps can use roaming but some can't ;(
There are like 10 apps always turned on, but if i try turning roaming off for an app that is on already it wont work!
If i close settings and reopen it, the app is now denied using roaming!
If i try allowing an app it changes but still wont work and after some time it gets in the same possission i cant change!
I have never experienced this before and i could't find an answer on google ;(
If you know how to fix it please respond to me here :)
~somonekilledme
P.S: Im really sorry if there are bad english here, but im mot english sooooo..... yeah

You are on the right track suspecting DHCP conflicts.
To configure your "roaming network" connect your "slave" Extreme to your main Internet router - either directly or through a switch - and place it in "bridge mode". That will work.
A router will be distributing IP addresses using DHCP. Anything connected to it should be configured as a bridge, the essential difference being that a bridge does not distribute IP addresses.
I do not believe your "slave" Extreme will function connected as it is to the "main" Extreme, but may work if you assign it a static IP address. It is not unusual for it to retain this static IP after having been changed to DHCP if its lease is still valid.
The OK article you referenced must be terribly outdated if it is referring to AirPort Admin Utility. That has not been used in about a decade. Read this one:
Wi-Fi base stations: Extending the range of your wireless network by adding additional Wi-Fi base stations
Unfortunately its screenshots refer to AirPort Utility 5.6, which has been replaced with the prettier, though less useful 6.2.

Define read-only authorization for specific field(s) on a form for 11.5.9

Dear all,
Can you pls let me know how is it possible to define read-only authorization access for specific field(s) per responsibility / user on a form in 11.5.9?
For example I want to protect the item master file by assigning for example to users with responsibility buyer authorization to modify the buyer information but to have read-only only authorization on other sensitive fields such as make/buy flag, expense accounts, etc
Through UI Modeller I have only managed to make specific fields on specific forms invisible, or whole tabs invisible, to specific responsibilities but this does not cover my needs as I want them to be able to view the data of the fields but to not be able to update them

Arun,
Almost but not quite.. The example you've given has the person VO at the top level which includes all the id's (City, State etc). My use case is slightly different.
query 1
     select org_id, OrgName from x;
query 2
     select emp_id, emp_name from y where org_id = x.org_id
query 3
     multi-table join (approx 9 tables) to retrieve depts associated to employee
     where org_id = x.org_id
     and emp_id = y.emp_id
Rather than using LOV's would it be better to create VO's and pass in the bind parameters at run time?

Sales Order Original Order Quantity for Specific Item

Hi there
Where/How can I find the Original Order Quantity for Specific Sales Order?
SELECT * FROM ont.oe_order_lines_history where version_number=0 ( I have multiple version for that specific Order)
Do I have to use version number 0 to get the Original Order Quantity?
Thanks
ASIM

Hi there
I wrote the following query to get the first version of the Sales order Line which shows the original Order Quantity , this query is very slow, it complete in 1 minute and 20 seconds for one Item.
SELECT hist.header_id,
     hist.line_id,
     hist.promise_date,
     hist.ordered_item
FROM ont.oe_order_lines_history hist
WHERE LTRIM (hist.ordered_item, '0') = '37879'
AND hist.version_number =
(SELECT MIN (hist2.version_number)
FROM ont.oe_order_lines_history hist2
WHERE hist.header_id = hist2.header_id
AND hist.line_id = hist2.line_id)
Is it the right method to get the Original Quantity?
Thanks
ASIM

Posting limit restriction ( UpTO 10000) for T Code FB60 - for specific GL

Dear All,
Posting limit restriction ( UpTO 10000) for T Code FB60 - for specific GL
Is it Possibal ?
Any other way to stop Posting Amt more than Rs 10000 ( Ten Thousand)
In specific T Code FB60
Required urgent Help,
Your early reply / solution is expected
Regards,
S Kulkarni

Hi,
Just go to OB28, define a validation (if you do not use one already), define one step, define the prerequisites on BSEG level of the account and define the check.
For example, you can use the validation for the following situation: You want to make sure that postings to the expense account "Telephone costs" can only be posted to the services cost center "Telephone". You can carry out the checks needed for this by using the validation.
Activities
If you want to define new validations, go through the following activities:
1. Place the cursor on a line in which company code and callup point are entered (you can enter company code and validation callup point via Edit -> New entries).
2. Afterwards select Environment -> Validation. You reach the first screen for maintaining a validation.
3. Select Validation -> Create. Enter the required name. After pressing ENTER, you come to an overview screen of the validation activities belonging to the validation.
4. Select Insert entry. On the next screen you can describe a new validation activity. You describe the check requirements and the actual check for this. The syntax to be used for this is described in the online help (F1 help) for the input fields for Requirements and Check. You can also define a message (warning or error message) which is sent if the check is not successful.
If you want to change validations which already exist, proceed as follows:
1. Place the cursor on an already existing entry and select Goto -> Validation.
2. On the next screen select Validation -> Display or Validation -> Change. After pressing ENTER, you get to the overview screen of the validation activities belonging to the validation. If you select Insert entry, you can carry out changes if necessary.
Regards,
Eli

Different GL needs to pickup when we do PGI for specific Customers

Hi Team,
our client is looking for scenario as below.
when we do the PGI system will pickup the GL's from the OBYC settings based on the condition.
i.e COGS 123 a/c DR
inventory A/c
for all scenarios.
now client is expecting when i creat SO for specific customer and if i do PGI system should pick different COGS a/c not 123 considering above example.
please help me out is there any exit or badi or enhancement spot for this.
Regards,
Raman

Hi Subho da
We cant change transaction type based on Customer
One option is to create a Z movement type and assign a new modifier in OMJJ instead of VAX
Usually, PGI is done from 601 movement type which triggers GBB VAX
Create a Copy of 601 and change VAX to ZVX and assign another GL in GBB ZVX in OBYC
Br. Ajay M

How to set an alerting substitution for another user as admin?

Dear experts,
having the case on of our employees went on vaction without entering a substitution for his alerts.
How can I as an administrator setup a substitution for the alerts of this user?
Thanks in advance,
BR Matthias

No ideads around?

How to apply Software Restriction policy for specific user in local group policy object ?

I am working on implementing user based software restriction policy programmatically for local group policy object.
If i create a policy through Domain Controller,i do have option for software restriction policy in user configuration but in local group policy editor i don't have option for that.
When i look for the changes made by policy applied from Domain Controller in registry, they modifies registry values for specific users on path HKEY_USERS\(SID of User)\Softwares\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Safer\Codeidentifiers
They also have registry.pol stored in SYSvol folder in Domain Controller. When i make the same changes in registry to block any other application, application is getting blocked.
I achieved what i wanted but is it right to modify registry values ?
PS:- I am using Igrouppolicyobject API

I achieved what I wanted but is it right to modify registry values ?
You also can modify a registry programmatically based policy. Check this:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dsadsi/archive/2009/07/23/working-with-group-policy-objects-programmatically-simple-c-example-illustrating-how-to-modify-a-registry-based-policy.aspx
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

How to block accounting by MIRO for specific type of documents.

Hello
Is there any possibility to block accounting by MIRO for specific type of document? So you could only account specific type of documents by FBV* or FB*.
Regards
Marcin Obukowicz

Hi,
You can try to make a validation (OB28) which will check the document type based on transaction code prerequisites.
Regards,
Eli

How to make repricing for specific conditions at the time of billing?

Hello
I'm SD Pricing person. Let me ask here experts below my concern.
In EU countries, there is recycling fee in sales of electronics or Note PC with batteries....to keep our earth clean.
So when customers buy such products, they have to pay more as recycling fee including invoice amount.
My question is... we want to make repricing for recycling conditions when the billing is created.
Based on our configuration, recycling condition is not defined as a kind of tax condition.
So this value is just copied from sales order.
(pricing type in copy control is 'G' which means repricing for tax condition.)
In this situation, we want to make repricing for those conditions during operating system.
Is there any easy way to cover this?
As I think, this is not easy because the system is already operated.
To change condition attribution is really risky. If we dare do, we have to migrate all open orders.
So I want to put this way to the end of my choice.
For this requirement,
1. We have to change condition class or category or calculation type in order to be repriced based on pricing type 'G'.
(ex. Set the condition category as 'I' inter-billing or 'L' always repricing.)
But transaction data are created now and all open orders will be affected.
2. To create new conditions are not easy because these conditions are mapped to the CO-PA value field and the values are posted in FI doc.
3. To change pricing type in copy control is almost impossible because of the impact.
What can I do this in this situation?
What I want to do is just to make repricing for specific conditions at the time of billing in case that pricing type of copy control is 'G'.
Thank you in advance.

Let me ask agagin to all experts.
I want to make A condition to be repriced at the time of billing.
For this, I have to set condition category as 'L' (Generally new when copying).
But I do not want to do in that way becauuse I am maintaining big operated system now.
In addition, though I migrate open orders after changing config. as 'L', it is almost impossible for use to migrate because we have more than a thound open orders per a DAY as Globalized system.
That is why I am asking.
Simply I can create new condition but as I mentioned, there are various recycling fee so we already created about 10 conditions. And this recycling conditions are linked to REA package of SAP. So creating another 10 more conditions can not be a way for us.
At last, what I want is not to be shown this condition only in billing doc.
'A' condition should be displayed in both Sales order and Billing doc.
And simultaneously, when the billing is created and if user changed 'A' condition master, then new value which is different from sales order have to be reflected in billing doc.
Thank you in advance.

Push notifications for specific apps not working even though the badge updates (Facebook, Google etc.)

So this has been happening for months now. I was expecting iOS 5 to fix it, but it hasn't. Push notifications for specific apps do not work. Some come through just fine, but Facebook and Google+ in particular don't work correctly. Facebook push notifications seem to work when the notification is generated from an action performed on a mobile device (ie: someone writes on my wall from another iPhone); if they do the same thing on the desktop, the notification doesn't seem to come through.
As for Google+, I've never seen a single push notification come through as it should, even though I've seen other iPhones with the same app reciving these notifications with no issue.
This is particularly strange because the badge on the app icon usually updates (though it feels like fetch, not push), but the notifications simply don't make it into the notification center (or on the lock screen as they should). As I said, this has been happening for months, long before iOS 5, and the problem has persisted now that I'm running iOS 5.
I've checked and rechecked all notifiation settings for these apps. I've uninstalled and reinstalled them. I've called Apple support and they couldn't offer me any help. Does anyone have any idea what's going on here?
Thanks for your time.

I got an iPhone 4s and I'm experiencing the same problems. I used facebook messenger, and used to get the push notifications to that app, but now that i've deleted it I no longer get the messages directly to the facebook app.
I have push on in the mail settings and notification center for facebook are on as well. I also have push notifications on in the settings for facebook.
I've tried deleting the app and reinstalling, no fix. I haven't tried a hard reset yet.
So far, I figured out that it's not iOS or the facebook app, somehow it is a problem with my account. I logged into my wife's account on my iphone and her account is able to recieve push notifications to my iphone.
Any thoughts?

Restrict creation of sales order for specific customer

Hello All,
I want to restrict creation of sales order (of particular sales order type) for specific customer, please let me know how can I do it.
Your early reply will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Mahavir

HI
As per My knowledge it is not possible in Standard SAP , you need to go with Enhancement
Go to SE38 : MV45AFZB, User Exit: USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAK
Regards,
Prasanna

Substitution for "Cost of sales Accounting" not working with cycle-trx KSC5

Hello togehter,
I have a problem that it seems that a created Substitution for "Cost of sales Accounting" is not executed in our System when running a cycle for Indirect Activity Allocation (Trx. KSC5).
Now I want to debug the Indirect Activity Allocation but I don't know how those Substitution Steps are generated as code that I can set a breakpoint when executing the cycle with Trx KSC5.
I want to try a trace when activating the substitution with transaction OBBZ but I'm not able to analyze in which Forms/Functions the Code is generated.
I also saw some OSS Notes that there are problems with "Cost of Sales Accounting" but I don't know concretely what to do to solve that special problem.
Kind regards
Udo

thanks for your answer.
I added the filed FKBER in table VWTYGB01.
Now I can select field "functional area" for CO Substitution.
nevertheless substitution does not work and set functional area on Dummy FB 9990 for CO postings to CO-object without Functional area.
Thats curious because I maintained exactly the same Substitution on an other SAP System (IDES Test System) and here it works.
Any ideas?
Are there further settigs required after maintenance of table VWTYGB01??
Thanks in advance

Substitution for specific subpopulation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for