Substitution rule for SD Condition type
We have a pricing procedure ZPOS in which we have SD condition type ZM10 for 7% additional special levy on the basic billing.
The account key ERS is assigned to the condition type and a GL is assigned to the account key in VKOA settings.
Based on different invoice types, the special levy amount should hit different GL accounts via a substitution rule without creating multiple condition types.
Please respond if anyone has a solution to this scenario.
Hello,
You can use business transaction event for G/L account changing while posting FI documents.
But you can use SD exit while transfering SD invoice to FI document.
Please try this exit below,
SDVFX004 - User exit G/L line in transfer to accounting - EXIT_SAPLV60B_004
I hope this exit more useful than substitution.
Regards,
Burak
Similar Messages
-
Trigger substitution rule for a background job
Hi all,
I ve written a subroutine in Substitution rules for FI in GGB1 tcode for F110 transaction to replace the section code (bseg-secco) while posting a fi document.
but the substitution rule is not getting triggered as F110 runs a background job to post the document...
The substitution is active and the activation level is active all the time.
Could u please suggest how to get it triggered for a background job...Measuring External Processes
Use
The runtime analysis allows you to switch into work processes that are already running and to measure the runtime of dialogs running in them as though they were running in the current session. You can have up to ten external sessions, which may be of any type for example, dialog, update, or spool. This runtime analysis variant is ideal for monitoring long-running background jobs.
Filename and Directory
If you do not want to use the default filename and directory to store files, you can change them using the profile parameter abap/atrapath. If the profile parameter does not contain an entry at all, an error occurs when you start the runtime analysis. -
Substitution Rule for Payment Term
Hi Expert,
I have to have Substitution for payment term the following criteria:
Company Code = '1000' AND Document Type = 'L1' AND Posting key = '14', then ... substitution bseg-zterm with certain payment term.
Problem: there is no substitution for bseg-zterm.
I read the post at http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/substitution-rule-for-payment-term-489202
and found that I need to apply a SAP note 42615 in order to enable the BSEG-ZTERM field in Substitution Rule for Payment Term, and after that run Program RGUGBR00 to regenerate the substitution.
But, problem again, our SAP is ECC 6.0, and the said SAP note is not applicable.
Kindly advise is there any other way that I can enable the bseg-zterm field at substituion.
Thanks,
sbmelHi
1. Go to SE16N and enter Table GB01
2. Enter &SAP_EDIT in the command prompt i..e the space where you type your T code and press enter
3. BCL TAB = BSEG and Field = ZTERM... Execute
4. Remove the X for the field BEXCLUDE.. SAVE....
5. Select this entry and menu Table > Transport > Include in tr request
6. Run RGUGBR00
Br, Ajay M -
Steps to create substitution rule for field BSEG-RECID
MIRO generates FI document. FI document has BSEG-RECID field. I need to apply substitution for BSEG-RECID depending on the value of the RSEG-GEBER field in MIRO. The substitution must be activated only if account to be booked is PL account in FI and derived MM document based on ZNPP PO type.
Field values are as follows:
RSEG-GEBER BSEG-RECID
No value No value
N N
D D
A A
Could anyone please let me know the steps to create the above substitution rule for the FI document
Thank YouHi,
You can do it as below:
Prerequisite : Select the document type for which you want check, here you have to select the BKPF-BLART = " " (Give the document type for the MIRO)
Substitution: Use the User exit with the logic as you said.
If you want you can use the user exit in both PREREQ & SUBSTITUTION. It will be applicable in your case
VVR -
Asset substitution rules for mass changes
Dear all,
I create worklist in order to use substitution rule for mass change.
But when running transaction AR31 I have following error message:
No administrator found for the task
Message no. 5W141
I found transaction OAWF but what must I do with this?
Thanks for your help.
DavidHi David,
In sight of resolving the error 5W141 when running the workflow in AR31, maybe following information can help.
1- Transaction OAWF: check if the responsible users are assigned to the workflow tasks
Menu path: Basic Functions
Assign tasks to agent
Correct worklist
Release worklist
Correct and release worklist
2- Then also check if the users are assigned to the workflow-tasks in the basis-component (transaction PFTC).
Menu path: Task type: TS - Standard task
Task : corresponding task
Also check the minimum customizing for workflow: SWU3 => automatic customizing
Maybe the following SAP Notes help you in addition:
127931 Workflow for Mass change in FI-AA from 40B on
322526 Analysis for workflow problems
152871 Release Upgrade considerations for workflow
Best regards,
Brigitte -
In sales order for the condition type MWST, **Tax code** is displaying wron
Hi
In sales order for the condition type MWST, *Tax code* is displaying wrongly at header level i.e. FF instead of AO (under account determination tab)
AO tax is 0% but for FF it is 19%
I have checked with the Access sequence it is picking access 08 correctly according to this it should show AO in tax code field for MWST but it is not so..
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Even if I consider material tax classification and customer tax code should not be FF because tax code FF is not maintained for the combination of access sequences for condition type MWST
Please help me.
Rajendra PrasadDear Rajendra,
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Definitely material Tax classification will influence to determine the Tax code.
-->So Make sure that customer and material master having proper tax classification indicator.
-->Have you Update the price after changing the tax classification in the sales order.by going to item dat -->condition tab then click on Update push button bottom of the conditions screen.
-->Once again the check the condition record maintanence also for your MWST access sequence.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali. -
Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD
Hi,
We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
Thanks in Advance,
DharmveerHi,
We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
Thanks,
Dharmveer -
New Tax code Creation for CST(Condition type
Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue during creation of new Tax-code for CST; condition type JIN1. After defining the tax percentage; system is picking an automatic G/L account, which is a grey field and can't be editable. We need to change G/L account and need to assign a new one.
Can you please tell us how can we remove the default assigned and non-editable G/L account.
Your support is appreciable.
Rgds, Krishan Raheja.Hi Krishnan,
Use transaction OB40, here double click on the Account Key (you can check this account key assigned to condition type in OBQ3 and also in FTXP screen) that is mapped to condition type JIN1 and enter your chart of accounts. Now change the G/L account you want.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi. -
Function Module for getting the Sales Price for a condition type
Hi,
I am looking for a standard function module to which I can pass my condition type(new customizing) and it will return the sales price. The customer is going to create some new condition type to manitain the sales price. I'll have the necessary information like material/sales org/distribution channel, customer and need the standard function module to read the condition records for that condition type(as configured) and give me the price. PLease help if you know of a standard function module performing this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
MalthiHi malthi ,
welcome to sdn
for material sales area u can look for the validations is table MVKE.
the classification of the conditions is in tables like A901, a902 etc which in my opinion holds the condition types per classification .
put a A* in se11 and this will give the list of tables per classification .
u need to get the conditions as per kschl and dmbtr and
etc..
like this ..
Get Condition Values for Material/Plant combination
IF NOT i_a916[] IS INITIAL.
SELECT knumh kappl kschl krech
kbetr konwa kpein kmein
INTO TABLE i_konp
FROM konp
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_a916
WHERE knumh EQ i_a916-knumh AND
kappl EQ i_a916-kappl AND
kschl EQ i_a916-kschl AND
loevm_ko NE 'X'.
ENDIF.
Get Condition Values for Material/Plant/Ordertype/
Customer combination
IF NOT i_a925[] IS INITIAL.
SELECT knumh kappl kschl krech
kbetr konwa kpein kmein
APPENDING TABLE i_konp
FROM konp
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_a925
WHERE knumh EQ i_a925-knumh AND
kappl EQ i_a925-kappl AND
kschl EQ i_a925-kschl AND
loevm_ko NE 'X'.
ENDIF.
just check this Fm if u can apply ur condition over here ..
ME_GET_PRICE_CONDITION
regards,
VIjay. -
ME21N : Donu2019t copy the price for all condition types from last po
Dear.
When I create a purchase order the price for all condition types are copied from last purchase order inside the info-record.
But I have some condition types like FRA1 or FRA2 that I donu2019t want that system transfer price from last purchase order.
How can I do that ?
Thanks.Hi Cris,
Go to SPRO>MM>PUR>Info Record>Define Price History> Here with your Purchasing organization if the tick is active that
Specifies that the order price history (PO price history) is to be updated with the effective price.
Normally, the order price history is updated with the net price.
Procedure
Set this indicator if you want the order price history to be updated with the effective price.
Thanks
Diwakar -
Condition Records For Tax Condition types for SAP 4.7
Dear Experts,
What is the procedure to maintain condition records for tax condition types like CST , VAT and Service Tax. We are not using CIN. In MM01 and XD02 tax classifications i have maintained UTXJ condition Type and also maintained the above mention tax condition types.. But when i create condition records for UTXJ in VK11 the sysytem is asking for Tax code. In FTXP when i defined Tax code A1 for Tax ProcedureTAXIN1 where i maintained all the Tax condition types there.But i am unable to save the Tax % in FTXP.When i try to save the tax code it is not saving.
Is there any other procedure to maintain Tax condition types for SAP4.7.
My Pricing procedure that i maintained in V/08 is Z00001.
Regards
JyotiHi Jyoti
Since you are not using CIN, you can do the follwing for tax conditions
Check the assignment of the TAx procedure to country
once u do this , you will be able to maintin the vendor and customer records for MWST type for taxes
then create condition records for MWSt with access sequence MWST in condiution type or design one suited to your needs
alternatevely in the current procedure you can change access sequence for condition type UTXJ form the current one to MWST and then maintain condition records
hope this helps
thanks
Akasha -
Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation
Hi All,
I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
Actual Issue:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
Can anybody solve this issue!
What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.Hi All,
Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
Working:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
Actual Issue:
When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
tax value is not picked .
I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
What can be the issue over here!
Can anybody give me solution for the same!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep. -
Function module to change the value for pricing condition type
Hello experts,
I want to change the value for pricing condition type for an item in the transaction CRMD_ORDER.
I used many function modules but none are working.
Please kindly suggest a function module that will change the value for a condition type .
I have used the following function module but its not working, please correct the coding if anything needs to be changed or added. Please help me .
Thank you.
CLEAR PRCD_COND.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM PRCD_COND WHERE KPOSN = WA_ORDERADM_I-GUID AND
KSCHL = COND_TY.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
* MOVE-CORRESPONDING PRCD_COND TO L_COND_CHG.
* CLEAR L_COND_CHG-KBETR.
L_COND_CHG-STUNR = PRCD_COND-STUNR.
L_COND_CHG-KBETR = COND_PRC.
* L_COND_CHG-KSCHL = COND_TY.
INSERT L_COND_CHG INTO TABLE T_COND_CHG.
L_HEAD_GUID = CRMD_ORDERADM_H-GUID.
L_ITEM_GUID = WA_ORDERADM_I-GUID.
INSERT L_HEAD_GUID INTO TABLE HEAD_GUID.
INSERT L_ITEM_GUID INTO TABLE ITEM_GUID.
CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_READ'
EXPORTING
IT_HEADER_GUID = HEAD_GUID
IT_ITEM_GUID = ITEM_GUID
IMPORTING
ET_ORDERADM_H = LT_ORDERADM_H
ET_ORDERADM_I = LT_ORDERADM_I
ET_PRIDOC = IT_PRIDOC_RD
ET_DOC_FLOW = T_DOC_FLOW
* CHANGING
* CV_LOG_HANDLE =
* EXCEPTIONS
* DOCUMENT_NOT_FOUND = 1
* ERROR_OCCURRED = 2
* DOCUMENT_LOCKED = 3
* NO_CHANGE_AUTHORITY = 4
* NO_DISPLAY_AUTHORITY = 5
* NO_CHANGE_ALLOWED = 6
* OTHERS = 7
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
* WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_PRIDOC_RD TO L_PRI_COND.
INSERT L_PRI_COND INTO TABLE PRI_COND.
LOOP AT IT_PRIDOC_RD INTO LS_PRIDOC_RD.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_PRIDOC_RD TO L_PRIDOC_CHG.
L_PRIDOC_CHG-PRIC_COND = PRI_COND.
L_PRIDOC_CHG-REF_GUID = LS_PRIDOC_RD-GUID.
L_PRIDOC_CHG-COND_CHANGE = T_COND_CHG.
INSERT L_PRIDOC_CHG INTO TABLE PRIDOC_CHG.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT LT_ORDERADM_H INTO LS_ORDERADM_H .
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_ORDERADM_H TO L_HEADER.
INSERT L_HEADER INTO TABLE HEADER.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT LT_ORDERADM_I INTO LS_ORDERADM_I.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_ORDERADM_I TO L_ITEM.
INSERT L_ITEM INTO TABLE ITEM.
ENDLOOP.
L_FIELD-FIELDNAME = 'STUNR'.
INSERT L_FIELD INTO TABLE FIELD.
L_FIELD-FIELDNAME = 'KBETR'.
L_FIELD-CHANGEABLE = 'X'.
INSERT L_FIELD INTO TABLE FIELD.
L_INPUT-FIELD_NAMES = FIELD.
L_INPUT-REF_KIND = 'E'.
L_INPUT-REF_GUID = LS_PRIDOC_RD-GUID.
L_INPUT-OBJECTNAME = 'PRIDOC'.
INSERT L_INPUT INTO TABLE INPUT.
CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'
EXPORTING
IT_PRIDOC = PRIDOC_CHG
IMPORTING
ET_EXCEPTION = EXCEPT
CHANGING
CT_INPUT_FIELDS = INPUT.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
* WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
REFRESH EXCEPT.
CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_SAVE'
EXPORTING
IT_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE = HEAD_GUID
* IV_UPDATE_TASK_LOCAL = FALSE
* IV_SAVE_FRAME_LOG = FALSE
* IV_NO_BDOC_SEND = FALSE
* IT_ACTIVE_SWITCH =
IMPORTING
ET_SAVED_OBJECTS = SAVED
ET_EXCEPTION = EXCEPT
ET_OBJECTS_NOT_SAVED = UNSAVED
* CHANGING
* CV_LOG_HANDLE =
* EXCEPTIONS
* DOCUMENT_NOT_SAVED = 1
* OTHERS = 2
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
* WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.Hi,,
To be able to call a function module in an update work process, you must flag it in the Function Builder. When you create the function module, set the Process Type attribute to Update with immediate start
Alternatively u can use this function module.
CRM_STATUS_DATA_SAVE_DB
BAPI_CUSTOMERCRM_CHANGE (If u wish to use a bapi for this).
Also , Let me know what error you got when implementing other function module.Does the function module didnt return any error but still the value is not changed for pricing condition type? -
Table for Substitution rules for profit center
Can anybody help me with the table name for Substitution rules for profit centers ?
Thanks
SandeepHi
Check This tables
CEPC - Profit Center
CSKS - Cost Center
Ranga -
Hide values for certain condition types in Quotation Saleorder and Invoice
Hi All,
I have written code to hide values for certain condition types in LV69AFZZ,
this works fine in the ITEM LEVEL.
But for the same condition types, I could not hide the values in the HEADER LEVEL.
Unless I hide it at header level also, this is useless.
Please guide me how to do it.
Thanks & Regards
PradeepHi,
We have been using FORM USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION of LV69AFZz for item level & FORM USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFIC_KOPF of LV69AFZZ for hiding heade level conditions.
I hope this helps,
Regards
Raju chiutale.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Changing preferences for photoshop cs5 in windows 7 64bit
[email protected] Why does nothing tally in photoshop? The tutorials always differ to the text in photoshop? why is there no preference editing for windows 7 64 bit?
-
Time Capsule no longer recognizing USB Disk
We purchased a new all-in-1 printer and tried to hook it up USB to the TC. Scanning wasn't available, so we decided to hook the printer up to a local Mac. Now, the USB port doesn't recognize external USB drives like it used to for handy TC backups an
-
Thierry - Open website in new window link
Hey Thierry, I'm trying to validate a page of mine for xhtml strict and am working on the target="_blank" issue (last error). I thought I remembered you posting something about an article of yours, which I found, but I can't seem to get it to work. I
-
OAM lost pswd mgmt stylesheet issue
We are getting stylesheet error after making changes to lpm_changepwd.xsl. How do we go about troubleshooting it? We are able to open the the xsl file in IE and see the content. Thanks. VS
-
iPhone 5, Icons and screen suddenly become large, Very hard to switch phone off , when I switch phone back on all icon back to normal ? My phone is 1 year old.