Substitution rules . not working

Hi
I add a step in existing substitution. throgh GGB1. ( Cost accounting > Item Line ) . when i checked throgh FB60 or FB01. Cost center is not substituted.
Prerequsiti >>     COBL-AUFNR = 'FDX-5031'
Field                  is substituted by:
Cost Center            Constant value    50002
what i m missing.
thanks\james

Did you check the GGB4 activation of your substitution?
Edited by: Panagiotis Papaspyridakos on Dec 7, 2009 3:09 PM

Similar Messages

Substitution rule not working

Hi
The substitution rule for getting the desired Business place and Section code is not working in Transaction code MRIS, whereas this substitution rule is working in all other Transaction codes.
Please suggest.
Regards
Prakash

Bhanu,
Subsitution rule works when you are posting in Financial Accounting tables: BSEG and BKPF. FB60 and MIRO do that.
The report doesn't make post in mentioned tables to get substitution done. Please make sure if there is a existing call transaction or only a planning are being assigned.
regards

MRIS Substitution rule not working

Hi
the Substitution rule to populate the Business Place and Section code is working with all other transaction codes like FB60, MIRO etc., but not working with MRIS (Mass MIRO) by which we are facing problem in J1INCHLN. Please suggest regarding.
SAP Marketplace has rejected siting it as consulting issue.
Regards
Prakash.

Bhanu,
Subsitution rule works when you are posting in Financial Accounting tables: BSEG and BKPF. FB60 and MIRO do that.
The report doesn't make post in mentioned tables to get substitution done. Please make sure if there is a existing call transaction or only a planning are being assigned.
regards

Substitution Rule not working for invoice receipt

Hi All,
I have written a Substitution rule using OBBH T.code for Call point "2" - Line item, The rule details are as below
For Account "GR/IR Account" And "Business Area=XXXX" Substitute "Profit Center = YYYY"
When I do Goods Receipt the my substitution is working, it is replacing the existing cost center to "YYYY", but when i do Invoice Receipt the profit center is being derived from the account assignment of the WBS element.
I tried writing a derivation rule 3KEI and it didn't work either,
How can i make my above substitution to work on both (GR and IR) accounting documents.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Shasha

Hello,
Perhaps your prerequisite need to contain other BKPF values like, company code, t-code, etc (if any).
Also please run program RGUGBR00 in SE38 to activate programs.
hope this helps
Regards
Ajith

(Substitution Variables) not working in "SQL Developer" Environment !!!!!!!

this photo illustrate how that (Substitution Variables) not working in "SQL Developer" Environment :-
http://www.imagehosting.com/show.php/1555180_ddddd.PNG.html
any solve for this problem ?????!!!!!!!!!!

There is a dedicated forum for SQL Developer related questions
SQL Developer
I should admit however, that query you have provided ( with substitution variables) works like a charme in my environment (SQL Developer 1.1.0.23 build 23.64)
Best regards
Maxim

Word substitution does not work on texts

Word substitution does not work when texting. It's fine in all other applications. Not even the pre defined substitutions like "mypin" works within text.

yoyongsc wrote:
Mine doesn't work in all applications, bbm, text, email, etc.
Verry odd! My Word Sub works well in all of those you've listed.
It does not work in commenting on BBM group pictures and in some BBM Channel comments... works every where else.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Substitution does not work

Hi,
I create substitution using exit by copy RGGBS000 to ZRGGBS000 and activated it in tcode OBBH. When I test using Tcode F-02, saves as complated, it is work.
My questions:
1. When I changes my parked document, why my substitution does not work ?
2. When I create document using Tcode F-65 and save as complate, why my substitution does not work ?
Thanks,

HI,
Note 158739 describes in detail the standard program behaviour. It's not a bug! It's the designed system behaviour.
The requirement can be fulfilled by a substitution when the document is posted. Or you can work with the ENJOY transactions, which enable substitutions when a document is saved as complete or posted. In case of just parking the substitutions don't work in ENJOY either.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

Infopath form load rule not working in browser forms but works on Client

Hi
I am working on an Infopath form and there are rules on form load. The form load checks for a value in a list, if the username() matches the one in the list, then the form would change its view.
It works when I open it on client, but on the browser it fails.
Have anyone encountered such an issue.

Check below:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16222681/infopath-rule-is-not-running-when-checking-sharepoint-list-field-value
Ensure that "Include data for the active form only" was checked (I had to separate this field into another data connection because that box could not be checked for another field I was using), and
Ensure that in the rule I was selecting from the "dataFields" folder under the data connection instead of "queryFields"
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/28554/infopath-form-load-rules-not-working
if I edit the Infopath form on Infopath 2007, it seems that the rules for the load form will be visible if created.
This look like a bug. Here are the steps below that will lead you to the bug:
Step 1: Open the infopath form in Infopath 2010 and create 6 rules for Form Load and Save it as a file.
Step 2: Open that infopath form that you created in Step 1 in InfoPath 2010 and go to the
Form Load section. You will only see the first 5 rules. The 6th rules that you created for Step 1 will just "vanish". Now, close that infopath form.
Step 3: Open that infopath form that you created in step 1 in InfoPath 2007 and select Tools > Form Option. In the
Open and Save category, click the Rules button and add a new rule in it and save it.
Step 4: Open that infopath form that you modify as describe in Step 3 in InfoPath 2010. That 6th rule will be visible.
Therefore, there might be a bug in InfoPath 2010 that restrict Rules to a max of 5 in Form Load and thus if anyone open that form in SharePoint, only the first 5 rules will be executed.
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Defaulting Rules Not Working for Repair Orders in OM?

Hi,
Defaulting Rules have been setup for return line & standard line based on few conditions and it is working fine if we create a sales order directly from OM (Manual SO)?
But in our project we are using Depot Repair(Repair Orders), we tried to create a service request and then converted to a sales order here defaulting rules not working for repair orders?
Please help me to solve this issue ASAP.
Thanks,
Kishor

Hi,
You have like this:
1. Price list
2.OE_DEFAULT_PVT.Get_SOB_Currency_Code
You have to make
1. XXOE_DEFAULT_PVT.custom_code
2. Price list
3.OE_DEFAULT_PVT.Get_SOB_Currency_Code
Did you made own custom code to pick currency?
Regards,
Luko

Alert Rule - not working. Wild Card character issue

Hi All,
I have a requirement where I need to trigger alerts for mapping failures
of all the interfaces whose namespace is urn:abc.com:odna* or urn:abc.com.odna*. (in the first instance, there is dot before odna and int he second instance, a colon before odna )
So to suit both the cases, I gave urn:abc.comodna in the Alert Rule.
It worked before. But now its not working.
Then when i changed it to urn:abc.com:odna* it works again. i really dont understand how it worked before and why it fails now.
What is the reason for the unpredicatable behaviour of WildCard Character based Alert Rules?
Should Wild Card Characters be avoided completely?

Hey
Just create two separate alert rules for the same alert category
one for urn:abc.com:odna* and another for urn:abc.com.odna*.
but before that please make sure that "Suppress multiple alerts of this rule" box is unchecked.
Also please check SAP Note 913858
Thanx
Aamir
Edited by: Aamir Suhail on May 20, 2009 9:16 AM

Rule not working in workflow but works in simulation mode

Hi guys
i have one more strange issue. I have a rule assigned to one of my task to dtermine the agnet based on a z table which is executed by a z function module in the rule. The rule works fine and gets the desired agent when run in the simulation mode. But when we test it from the workflow it dosent seems to be working. When i check the workflow log it says no agent for this task. any idea what am i missing?
thanks in advance.

Hi
yes both the workflow and the dialog step( in our case a decision step) is categorized as General task. I also have used the SWU_OBUF to refresh the buffer but still the same results. Rule works fine in simulation but when it is run in a workflow the workflow log says no agent found. any more suggestions? the workflow to rule binding is fine as well. The rule requires 3 parameters and in the binding i am pasing all the 3 elemts to the rule containers. so i am not sure why its not working?

Text substitution does not work on all apps

Text substituiton feature works fine in Mac Mail, but does not work in Microsoft Word, excel and others.
How can I fix this?

Word and Excel do not support the system level text substitution routines. These work only with native apps like Mail, TextEdit and so forth. Some third-party apps can also tap into them.
The workaround is simple:
Preferences>AutoCorrect
Word will allow you to create any number of text substitutions. They won't, though, interact with native apps like Mail.
Microsoft Outlook, being more of a native OS X app, does support the system level text functions.

Delete rule not working

I subscribe to a mailing list using a particular email address (not my primary account), all mail for which is redirected into a mailbox. I only want to keep messages from the last five days. I have a Rule which is set as follows:
If ALL of the following conditions are met:
Account = <the account>
Date Received is Greater Than 5 days old
Perform the following actions:
Delete Message
This rule does does not work. It is the first rule in my list of Rules. And it simply does nothing. Why?

Maxplanar,
Mail rules only run when the item is first processed. So you are in effect going to delete things only when they are received in an "old" state.
I would set up a smart mailbox or two. One to only show the 5 days of mail you want to pay attention to. Optionally make another smart mailbox to contain messages older than 5 days. You can just refer to the first mailbox and only see the messages you want. The other mailbox will be there for once a month when you select all the messages and delete them.
Most macs can handle 5 to 10 thousand messages without even starting to slow down. Perhaps once you have a managable folder that shows you the messages you care to see, you can live with manually cleaning up much less often?

Derivation Rules Not Working for other company codes

Hi,
I have 5 Company codes and only for one FM was activated. now i want to activate FM for all 5 company codes. for which i have assigned the FM area to all 5 company codes. I have also assigned the derivation strategy to all 5 company codes as well. now when i post a transaction for any other company code derivation rules is not being process hence no commitment item or fund center is derived. however for the original company code for which FM was activated in the first derivation rule are working fine means system is deriving commitment item and fund center. can any one tell me why derivation rules are not working for other company codes? do i have to add Company code in source field of derivation strategy? could this be the reason? because in beginning there was no other company code so we did not included any company code field in the first place.
Regards,

Faizan,
Go to Funds Management Government> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration> Activate/Deactivate Funds Management.
In the screen create an entry for each Company Code and Funds Management Area combination.
Activate the AA Derivtn flag if you want the derivation to be called and the Update flag if you want to update commitments and actuals in FM.
Thanks
Shyam

Copa derivation rule not working for Discount GL

Hi All,
Kindly note that I have a distribution rule where company & plant combination is used where condtion is that customer group 3 should be 018 and then replace distribution channel to 03.However the rule is not working for discount GL posted in the billing document.
I tried testing it in FB50 but then it does not allows me to enter plant and because of that derivation rule fails. However in my billing doc I do see a plant against discount GL and still the rule is not getting picked.
I had raised this issue earlier but the reply where not as expected and so I have rephraised my question.
Kindly help me on this.
Regards
Pranay

Hi Pranay
I could not understand your req to a great detail, following are my observations
1. There should be derivation rule in place 1st of all to derive customer group from billing doc...
Check if Cust Group is populated in your COPA doc or not.. For this cust group should be a segment level char in KEQ3
2. Create a derivation rule using method "Derivation".
Source fields would be Cust Group, Plant and Company code ( I guess you want to change dist channel with this combination)
Target field would be VTWEG (Dist Channel)....Click on the magnifying lens beside VTWEG and choose relevant radio button "Overwrite if ......."
CLick on RULE VALUES and maintain the required Values there
This should work...
Regards
Ajay M

Substitution rules . not working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for