Subtotal with more than 2 columns do not appear in Printouts.

Hi,
I have a very strange problem .... When I print an ALV report with 1 level of sub-total everything prints perfect.... But when I try to print the same ALV report with 2 columns as subtotals, the printout is not correct... i.e. the sub-totals are not getting printed correctly.
Help in this matter will be great as the matter is most urgent.
Thanks.

closed

Similar Messages

Trying to create Mouse over effect with more than one show image appearing in same cell

Firstly this is the link to my test page: http://www.design39.co.uk/indexhope.html
If you roll your cursor over the top left logo (the D&S) one it displays an image to the left. If you roll your cursor onto the next logo (Netnotts) it fades away again. Great. Exactly what I wanted and created in CSS (well done me as I don't normally do much with CSS but the new CS4 has very forced it).
What I am trying to create is: When you roll onto the Netnotts logo, not only does the original image to the left disappear but a new relative one appears, this is to be for all the logos. In CSS I can only create it as far as I can. I have thought about using AP DIV tags to do it which would obviously work but to keep it in the right place, I would then have to align my whole website to the left instead of centered like it is and to be fair, that's not particularly pleasing to the eye as this is my own portfolio of work.
I can do flash to make 'pretty things' but have no idea about actionscript and java is way over my head but I am sure with some help I would be able to get it together as the that particular effect, although done in CSS, is running javascript I noticed.
Many thanks in advance.

A relative positioned layer? does this mean it knows how far to be away from the table as a pose to an absolute positioned layer which is lay 15px from the left? I need to be able to keep the positioning as its key, cant have the layer popping up in different places pending on the users browser size.
I posted the question on a few forums and I got the following back: http://www.design39.co.uk/bla.html
which is exactly what i wanted it to do but have no idea how to insert java script into my page; Further more, that was done in layers not table cells.
Any ideas?

SVG with more than one series (not working)

i have a line chart of type series as described in http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/2006/05/25/generic-charting-in-application-express/
and it is working fine!!!
now i want to add a new series in changing the parameter of my procedure to show the 2nd line in the same chart but then the svg region is blank.
what i'm doing wrong
my datastructure is
timestamp|value series 1|value series 2
the timestamp is mapped to "name"
the series is mapped to "value"
Message was edited by:
wzilgens

its based on a transaction log table; one row is called TRX_LINES, another TRX_REDO
Series1:
SELECT link,label,value FROM TABLE(stat_pkg.populate_job_stats(208,'TRX_LINES'))
sample data:
null 2006.09.21 14:26:11 5004
null 2006.09.21 14:26:42 5041
null 2006.09.21 14:27:18 5022
null 2006.09.21 14:27:39 5416
null 2006.09.21 14:27:49 6000
series2:
SELECT link,label,value FROM TABLE(stat_pkg.populate_job_stats(208,'TRX_REDO'))
sample Data:
null 2006.09.21 14:26:11 4072572
null 2006.09.21 14:26:42 4266152
null 2006.09.21 14:27:18 4085460
null 2006.09.21 14:27:39 4441464
null 2006.09.21 14:27:49 4799588
as you see, the x axis are the same timestamps (because it is exactly the same row)

Row chaining in table with more than 255 columns

Hi,
I have a table with 1000 columns.
I saw the following citation: "Any table with more then 255 columns will have chained
rows (we break really wide tables up)."
If I insert a row populated with only the first 3 columns (the others are null), is a row chaining occurred?
I tried to insert a row described above and no row chaining occurred.
As I understand, a row chaining occurs in a table with 1000 columns only when the populated data increases
the block size OR when more than 255 columns are populated. Am I right?
Thanks
dyahav

user10952094 wrote:
Hi,
I have a table with 1000 columns.
I saw the following citation: "Any table with more then 255 columns will have chained
rows (we break really wide tables up)."
If I insert a row populated with only the first 3 columns (the others are null), is a row chaining occurred?
I tried to insert a row described above and no row chaining occurred.
As I understand, a row chaining occurs in a table with 1000 columns only when the populated data increases
the block size OR when more than 255 columns are populated. Am I right?
Thanks
dyahavYesterday, I stated this on the forum "Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows." My statement needs clarification. It was based on the following:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i4383
"Oracle Database can only store 255 columns in a row piece. Thus, if you insert a row into a table that has 1000 columns, then the database creates 4 row pieces, typically chained over multiple blocks."
And this paraphrase from "Practical Oracle 8i":
V$SYSSTAT will show increasing values for CONTINUED ROW FETCH as table rows are read for tables containing more than 255 columns.
Related information may also be found here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96524/c11schem.htm
"When a table has more than 255 columns, rows that have data after the 255th column are likely to be chained within the same block. This is called intra-block chaining. A chained row's pieces are chained together using the rowids of the pieces. With intra-block chaining, users receive all the data in the same block. If the row fits in the block, users do not see an effect in I/O performance, because no extra I/O operation is required to retrieve the rest of the row."
http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/B14340_01/data.htm
"For a table with several columns, the key question to consider is the (average) row length, not the number of columns. Having more than 255 columns in a table built with a smaller block size typically results in intrablock chaining.
Oracle stores multiple row pieces in the same block, but the overhead to maintain the column information is minimal as long as all row pieces fit in a single data block. If the rows don't fit in a single data block, you may consider using a larger database block size (or use multiple block sizes in the same database). "
Why not a test case?
Create a test table named T4 with 1000 columns.
With the table created, insert 1,000 rows into the table, populating the first 257 columns each with a random 3 byte string which should result in an average row length of about 771 bytes.
SPOOL C:\TESTME.TXT
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
INSERT INTO T4 (
COL1,
COL2,
COL3,
COL255,
COL256,
COL257)
SELECT
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
FROM
DUAL
CONNECT BY
LEVEL<=1000;
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
SELECT
FROM
T4;
SET AUTOTRACE OFF
SELECT
SN.NAME,
SN.STATISTIC#,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SPOOL OFFWhat are the results of the above?
Before the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 166
After the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 166
After the select:
NAME STATISTIC# VALUE
table fetch continue 252 332 Another test, this time with an average row length of about 12 bytes:
DELETE FROM T4;
COMMIT;
SPOOL C:\TESTME2.TXT
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
INSERT INTO T4 (
COL1,
COL256,
COL257,
COL999)
SELECT
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
FROM
DUAL
CONNECT BY
LEVEL<=100000;
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
SELECT
FROM
T4;
SET AUTOTRACE OFF
SELECT
SN.NAME,
SN.STATISTIC#,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SPOOL OFFWith 100,000 rows each containing about 12 bytes, what should the 'table fetch continued row' statistic show?
Before the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 332
After the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 332
After the select:
NAME STATISTIC# VALUE
table fetch continue 252 33695The final test only inserts data into the first 4 columns:
DELETE FROM T4;
COMMIT;
SPOOL C:\TESTME3.TXT
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
INSERT INTO T4 (
COL1,
COL2,
COL3,
COL4)
SELECT
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
FROM
DUAL
CONNECT BY
LEVEL<=100000;
SELECT
SN.NAME,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
SELECT
FROM
T4;
SET AUTOTRACE OFF
SELECT
SN.NAME,
SN.STATISTIC#,
MS.VALUE
FROM
V$MYSTAT MS,
V$STATNAME SN
WHERE
SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
SPOOL OFFWhat should the 'table fetch continued row' show?
Before the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 33695
After the insert:
NAME VALUE
table fetch continue 33695
After the select:
NAME STATISTIC# VALUE
table fetch continue 252 33695 My statement "Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows." needs to be clarified:
"Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows +(row pieces)+ if a column beyond column 255 is used, but the 'table fetch continued row' statistic +may+ only increase in value if the remaining row pieces are found in a different block."
Charles Hooper
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.
Edited by: Charles Hooper on Aug 5, 2009 9:52 AM
Paraphrase misspelled the view name "V$SYSSTAT", corrected a couple minor typos, and changed "will" to "may" in the closing paragraph as this appears to be the behavior based on the test case.

Is there a way to open CSV files with more than 255 columns?

I have a CSV file with more than 255 columns of data. It's a fairly standard export of social media data that shows volume of posts by day for the past year, from which I can analyze the data and publish customized charts. Very easy in Excel but I'm hitting the Numbers limit of 255 columns per table. Is there a way to work around the limitation? Perhaps splitting the CSV in two? The data shows up in the CSV file when I open via TextEdit, so it's there. Just can't access it in Numbers. And it's not very usable/useful for me in TextEdit.
Regards,
Tim

You might be better off with Excel. Even if you could find a way to easily split the CSV file into two tables, it would be two tables when you want only one. You said you want to make charts from this data. While a series on a chart can be constructed from data in two different tables, to do so takes a few extra steps for each series on the chart.
For a test to see if you want to proceed, make two small tables with data spanning the tables and make a chart from that data. Make the chart the normal way using the data in the first table then repeat the following steps for each series
Select the series in the chart
Go to Format sidebar
Click in the "Value" box
Add a comma then select the data for this series from the second chart
Press Return
If there is an easier way to do this, maybe someone else will chime in with that info.

Table with more than 35 columns

Hello All.
How can one work with a table with more than 35 columns
on JDev 9.0.3.3?
My other question is related to this.
Setting Entities's Beans properties from a Session Bean
bought up the error, but when setting from inside the EJB,
the bug stays clear.
Is this right?
Thank you

Thank you all for reply.
Here's my problem:
I have an AS400/DB2 Database, a huge and an old one.
There is many COBOL Programs used to communicate with this DB.
My project is to transfer the database with the same structure and the same contents to a Linux/ORACLE System.
I will not remake the COBOL Programs. I will use the existing one on the Linux System.
So the tables of the new DB should be the same as the old one.
That’s why I can not make a relational DB. I have to make an exact migration.
Unfortunately I have some tables with more than 5000 COLUMNS.
Now my question is:
can I modify the parameters of the ORACE DB to make it accept Tables and Views with more than 1000 columns, If not, is it possible to make a PL/SQL Function that simulate a table, this function will insert/update/select data from many other small tables (<1000 columns). I want to say a method that make the ORACLE DB acting like if it has a table with a huge number of columns;
I know it's crazy but any idea please.

Spatial index creation for table with more than one geometry columns?

I have table with more than one geometry columns.
I'v added in user_sdo_geom_metadata table record for every column in the table.
When I try to create spatial indexes over geometry columns in the table - i get error message:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29855: error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA table
ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA table
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD", line 8
ORA-06512: at line 1
What is the the solution?

I'v got errors in my user_sdo_geom_metadata.
The problem does not exists!

Report with more than 30 columns

XML Pub Gurus,
I have a requirement where I need to create a table layout with proper spacing for more than 30 columns and I asked this question in Open World XML Pub team and they responded to my question as "The page size in word has to be increased to allow to add those many columns". I was satisfied with the answer without knowing that Word will not allow more than 22" long in landscape. So, I am puzzled with the answer in Open World.
So, could somebody please give me guide lines to create this type of report for more than 30 Columns. This is very common requirement for us to report some of the stuff from the db.
Thanks in advance
Ram G

What do you want your final destination format to be? I'm thinking you'll probably want to go out to HTML or Excel. I would think that would be the only place where you could read and use a report with more than 30 columns.
Here's an idea if you want to go to excel and if you are using the 10.1.3.2 Enterprise (standalone) version.
1. Create your query with as many columns as you want.
2. Don't create a layout at all
3. Launch Excel Analyzer.
4. From within Excel, build your report based off the downloaded data (for example add a pivot table).
5. Upload your excel Analyzer template back to the server
This template can now be scheduled and delivered like normal templates or updated with current data directly from within Excel.

Word Mail Merge does not accurately import a Text field in Excel with more than 15 numbers

Hi, I've looked through some of the discussions regarding importing numbers from excel into word mail merge. I'm having a problem. In Excel I have a column that includes numbers with more than 15 digits. In Excel, I have made this column a text format, so
now in Excel those long numbers show up correctly. However, when doing a mail merge in Word, again the numbers past 14 digits change to zeros. I've read many help articles about this but am still not finding a solution. I even tried going the DDE route and
that didn't do it either. I checked out this answer: http://www.techsupportforum.com/forums/f57/mail-merge-data-corruption-429351.html which was the most helpful, but again, DDE seemed to work for this person but not for me. I hope someone can offer a solution.
I was hoping that I could do a picture switch, but that does not seem to be an option for this particular problem. I don't know why importing it in DDE format did not solve the problem. Thanks for any help!

Wow! After all my searching and just after posting this I figured out the solution! I originally had { MERGEFIELD Field_Name \# # } But then I just removed everything after the field name, as is normal for any other text field, so not indicating it was
a number, and now it shows up correctly even if the number (from a Text formatted field in Excel) is longer than 15 digits. Hope this helps anyone else who has a problem. I did not use DDE to solve this problem.

Spool request with more than 255 columns

Hi,
Please let me know what formatting type has to be used to have spool output with more than 255 lines.
X_24_80_JP        L      ANY           00024   00080   ABAP list HR Japan: At least 24 rows by 80 columns
X_44_120          L      ANY           00044   00120   ABAP/4 list: At least 44 rows by 120 columns
X_51_140_JP       L      ANY           00051   00140   ABAP list HR Japan: At least 51 rows by 140 columns
X_58_170          L      ANY           00058   00170   ABAP/4 list: At least 58 rows by 170 columns
X_60_80_JP        L      ANY           00060   00080   ABAP list HR Japan: At least 60 rows by 80 columns
X_65_1024/4       L      ANY           00065   01024   ABAP List: At Least 65 Lines 4*256=1024 Columns Four-Sided (Only for SAPlpd)
X_65_132          L      ANY           00065   00132   ABAP list: At least 65 rows by 132 columns
X_65_132-2        L      ANY           00065   00132   ABAP List: 2-column 65 characters 132 columns (only for SAPLPD from 4.15)
X_65_200          L      ANY           00065   00200   ABAP list: at least 65 lines with 200 columns (not for all device types)
X_65_255          L      ANY           00065   00255   ABAP/4 list: At least 65 rows with a maximum number of columns
X_65_256/2        L      ANY           00065   00256   ABAP list: At least 65 lines 2*128=256 double columns (SAPLPD only)
X_65_512/2        L      ANY           00065   00512   ABAP List: At least 65 Lines 2*256=512 Columns 2-sided (Only for SAPlpd)
X_65_80           L      ANY           00065   00080   ABAP/4 list: At least 65 rows by 80 columns
X_65_80-2         L      ANY           00065   00080   ABAP List: 2-column 65 characters 80 columns (only for SAPLPD from 4.15)
X_65_80-4         L      ANY           00065   00080   ABAP List: 4-column 65 characters 80 columns (only for SAPLPD from 4.15)
X_90_120          L      ANY           00090   00120   ABAP list: At least 90 rows by 120 columns
X_PAPER           L      ANY           00010   00010   ABAP/4 list: Default list formatting
X_PAPER_NT        L      ANY           00001   00001   ABAP/4 list: Obsolete (do not use)
X_POSTSCRIPT      L      ANY           00001   00001   Pre-prepared PostScript
X_SPOOLERR        L      ANY           00001   00001   ABAP list: Spooler problem report
X_TELEX           L      TELEX         00001   00001   Telex: 69 characters wide, only as many lines as supported by TTU
ZABC_SAP        L      ANY           00065   00550   LCM Report Page Type
I have created a custom Format Type with 65*550 (ZABC_SAP) , but still the output gets truncated in the spool.
In sp01 . For the spool request ... If it displayed in Graphical layoout ... Output is getting truncated but when we see in Raw format .. i can see the entire output. But it is not at all formatted.
Thanks,
Tanuj
Message was edited by:
        Tanuj Kumar Bolisetty

Hello Tanuj,
You need to use a page format greater than 255 columns for sure. However still if it does not solve the issue then you may consider using the note 186603.
PS: I guess you are on a higher release than 4.6 C . For this release this note íIt has a text attachment for a report tat allows to display such spool requests.
Regards.
Ruchit.

Not able to create a table with more than 64 fields in dictionary

Hi,
I have created a java dictionary in Netweaver Developer studio. I have to create a table with more than 64 fields in it. I was able to create the table in dictionary, but when i tried to build it, I am getting an error message as "more than 64 fields are not allowed". If i create the table with 64 fields or below 64 fields, i can build the dictionary and deploy it.
That is, when i create a table with more than 64 fieds, I am not able to compile the dictionary, But if i reduce the fields to 64 or below, i can compile the dictionary.
Kindly help me to solve the problem.
Regards,
Sudheesh

Hi,
Sudheesh,as far as I am aware creating of fields in the table actually depends on the total width of table that can be used for various Vendors.
So I actually tried out creating a table with too many fields,and I am reproducing the errors which I have obtained -
Error Dictionary Generation: DB2:checkWidth TMP_1: total width of table (198198 bytes) greater than allowed maximum (32696 bytes) TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages
Error Dictionary Generation: DB4:Table TMP_1: fixed length: 198366 (32767). TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages
Error Dictionary Generation: DB6:checkWidth TMP_1: total width of table (297200) including row overhead is greater than the allowed maximum for 16K tablespaces . TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages
Error Dictionary Generation: MSSQL:checkWidth TMP_1: total width(198215) greater than allowed maximum (8060) TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages
Error Dictionary Generation: SAPDB:checkWidth TMP_1: total width(198297) greater than allowed maximum (8088) TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages
Error Dictionary Generation: Table TMP_1 is not generated TMP_1.dtdbtable TestDictionary/src/packages 
I hope you can understand what the errors state.I am trying to create a table whose total width(sum of width all columns) is greater than the maximum allowed for various Vendors,such as DB2,MSSQL,SAPDB etc.
I hope this answer helps you create your table suitably
Regards,
Harish
(Please award points if this answer has been usefull)

Reports with more than 100 columns

I am using Apex 3.2. I am using a classic report with more than 100 columns. So to use the custom heading in the report, I exported the page,did modification in exported sql file and imported back.
But when I am passing the parameters from a input screen for the first time either it is showing the all data avilable in the database or with only header. If I do the refresh in input screen and try it then it is working as intended. I am updating at the below loaction of the page.Let me know if I have to update anything more in the sql file.
declare
s varchar2(32767) := null;
begin
s := null;
wwv_flow_api.create_report_columns (
p_id=> 200100535534034253 + wwv_flow_api.g_id_offset,
p_region_id=> 2003453533453 + wwv_flow_api.g_id_offset,
p_flow_id=> wwv_flow.g_flow_id,
p_query_column_id=> 157,
p_form_element_id=> null,
p_column_alias=> 'XYZ',
p_column_display_sequence=> 157,
p_column_heading=> 'XYZ 123',
p_column_alignment=>'LEFT',
p_disable_sort_column=>'Y',
p_sum_column=> 'N',
p_hidden_column=> 'N',
p_display_as=>'WITHOUT_MODIFICATION',
p_pk_col_source=> s,
p_column_comment=>'');
end;
/

Hi,
Its just a general thought and I realize you know your application and user community better I do, but do you think your users are going to be very happy when they are presented with a report with more than a hundred columns? Have you considered maybe presenting the data in some sort of rolled up form from which the user can then drill down to the data they are particularly interested in. Also, I'm sure your LAN administrator would be happy not to see 100+ column by x number row reports being regularly shipped across the network.
Also, 100+ column reports suggests tables with 100+ columns which are probably not designed in a very relationally compliant way. I find that good DB design usually results in applications that have to make less compromises, such as hacking export files in order to fool the API into making ridiculous, unsupported and unsupportable compromises.
Just a thought..................
Regards
Andre

Can I create a table with more than 40 columns ?

Hello,
I need to organize my work with a table and need about 66 columns. I am not very good with Numbers but I know a little bit of Pages. I cannot find a way to create a table with more than 40 columns... Is it hopeless ? (Pages '08 v. 3.0.3)
Thank you all

It's never too late to try to teach users that the Search feature is not only for helpers.
The number of columns allowed in Numbers is not a relevant value when the question is about Pages '08 tables.
I tried to copy a 256 columns Numbers table into a Pages '09 document.
I didn't got a table but values separated by TABs.
I tried to convert this text range in a table and got this clear message :
If I remember well, in Pages '08, the limit is 40 columns.
It seems that you are a specialist of inaccurate responses, but I'm not a moderator so I'm not allowed to urtge you to double check what you wrote before posting.
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) vendredi 29 avril 2011 14:57:58
Please :
Search for questions similar to your own before submitting them to the community

Create a logical column with more than one data source

I'm having a problem to create a logical column with more than one data source in Siebel 7.8.
What I want to do is the union of 2 physical tables in one logical table.
For example, I have a "local_clients" table and a "abroad_clients" table. What I want is to have a logical table "clients" with the client data from the 2 tables.
What I've tried is dragging the datasources I need onto the logical column.
However this isn't working because it only retrieves the data from the first data source.

Hi!
I think it is not possible to do this just by dragging the columns to the logical table. A logical table can have more than one source, but I think each column must have just one direct source column.
I'm not sure, but maybe you should do the UNION SQL to get the data of the two tables. In the physical layer, when you create a new physical table, it's possible to set the "table type" as a "SELECT". I didn't try that, but it seems that it's possible to have the union table in the physical layer.
Bye.
Message was edited by:
user578388

Need help: Dimensional column has assoc with more than 1 level

Hi,
I am trying to have multiple drill paths for a single dimension. For example, the Date dimension should be navigable by the following hierarchies:
DateDimension
+---- Calendar Year
......---- Calendar Quarter
............--- Calendar Month
..................-- Day
+---- Calendar Year
......---- Day
So, in other words, in Answers I should be able to add 'Calendar Year' to my report, display results, and then click down the path Calendar Year -> Calendar Quarter -> Calendar Month -> Day OR Calendar Year -> Day.
However, when I model this in the Admin tool, it allows it, but then I add the column in Answers and get a runtime error:
+[nQSError: 14064] Dimensional column [column name] has associations with more than one level+
This is possible in BO and other tools. If it is not possible in Oracle BI EE, then one alternative would be to have two separate versions of 'Calendar Year' added to the report in Answers, each with their own drill path.
Any ideas???
Thanks for any help you can provide.
Matt Warden
Balanced Insight, Inc.

Hi,
You try this one .
Create the Hierarchy Year --> Quarter--->Month-->Week-->Day in rpd as usual manner .But in Year report use navigate option in column properties add Quarterly Report (Caption it as 'Quarter')and Day level report(Caption it as 'Day') in navigate option.So when you click on Year column it i will prompt to select either Quarter or Day and when u select Quarter u will have normal drill functionality from Quarter to Month to Week and Day.Hope this helps you.
Thanks.

Subtotal with more than 2 columns do not appear in Printouts.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for