Sudden increase of Bounce Backs

Everyone in our company has suddenly seen an increase in Bounce Back email messages. I've been reviewing most of them and they usually say "Host or domain not found". I then usually try to ping or telnet into one of these domains and most of the time the domain DOES respond.
telnet mail.teltec.fr 587
The only change we made to the servers recently was to install a Barracuda Spam Firewall and then changes the DNS mx record to point it instead of directly to our server.
So why is our system having such difficulty sending out these emails? Below is a sample bounce back:
---- START BOUNCE BACK ----
This is the Postfix program at host mail.noahprecision.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The Postfix program
<[email protected]>: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=mail.teltec.fr type=A: Host found but no data record of requested
type
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.noahprecision.com
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 219675945B1
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [email protected]
Arrival-Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Host or domain name not found. Name service error
for name=mail.teltec.fr type=A: Host found but no data record of requested
typ

Try to deactivate the Barracuda firewall (if possible) and then test the mail service again. If it works, the problem may have its origin at the Barracuda box. Not sure if you find an expert here, but you may post its configuration for trouble shooting.

Similar Messages

IPhoto randomly stopped letting me drag/drop photos into finder. It's been working all week and all of a sudden, the photos bounce back into iPhoto and don't copy. I tried to rebuild the iPhoto library using the ALT CMD buttons, but that didn't work...

Any suggestions?

What happens if you export the photo (file menu ==> export)?
What do you see if you right click on one ane reveal in finder?
LN

I browse the Mail icon of my Iphone and want to get emails but cannot enter into the screen I usually get emails. Just bounce back to the Front Page. Can you help ?

I browse the Mail icon of my Iphone 4 and want to get emails but suddenly the screen bounced back to the front page and cannot entered to the screen I usually to get emails. Tried many times and rebooted the Iphone have the same result. Can you help ?

Did you already set the phone up "as new iphone" without using the latest backup, in case this contains corrupt data? How to back up your data and set up as a new device

Sudden increase in BT Infinity Latency - Harwich E...

I have had BT Infinity for a couple of months now and have a SamKnows broadband monitoring unit connected. It originally reported the latency to be 10 milliseconds, however on 9th December at 13:00 it jumped to 20ms and has remained there ever since, so the latency is now worse than it was with my old ADSL2+ (approx 15ms) and my son reports problems with lag now when online gaming.
Does anyone have any idea why the latency should suddenly increase like this, I presume it's a network issue somewhere.
I have a HomeHub 5 fitted.
Whether it's relevant, my connection was the 1st in the cabinet.
Any information would be appreciated. Thanks.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

DLM has probably decided to add interleaving to your line.
If you do a 'tracert bbc.co.uk' you will see the first hop after the HomeHub as around 6ms without interleaving, and around 16 ms with interleaving.
No reason I know of to expect lower pings on FTTC than ADSL. My bbc pings with BE/ADSL were around 11ms (no interleaving) or 20 ms (interleaving). With Infinity they are around 22ms (no interleaving) or 31 ms (interleaved). On BE I had the choice; I chose interleaving for greater stability and lower packet loss depite the ping increase. With FTTC you don't have the choice; you get what DLM gives you. I have been on interleaved for most of my Infinity contract, it was removed a couple of months ago (probably as a result of changes to the updated modem firmware).
A lot of my Infinity extra is the silly routing of all my traffic Winchester->Sheffield->London before it leaves the BT network; this adds around 9ms to my ping times; around 4/5 ms each for the hops north and back south.

Sudden increase in memory space

We have developed an application using the Hyperion 9.3.1.
We are trying to load data and the data load itself is taking lot of time.
Again, the memory space is getting increased drastically (almost to 100%).
We see lot of page files being generated.
What can be the reason for this sudden increase in memory space utilization.

you should consider the folllowing factors for sudden increase in memory space
1.Minimize the no of hierarchies otherwise it leads to increase in the size of aggregated data and slows down view selection
2. remove fragmentation
3.Compact the outline to remove the records of members that we have been deleted
4.create transparent partition if neccessary which leads to enable write-back partition.By doing this we can reducethe size of the Database and reduces calculation time.
5.use compression if values are grouped together in consecutive members on dimensions or hierarchies rather than spread throughout the outline with lots of
#missing data between values.

Sudden increase of AEBS issues? Is it linked to the latest Airport updates?

Is my impression correct that AEBS issues of a certain type (a) have suddendly increased and (b) seem to correlate with the latest Firmware Updates for AEBS?
I posted already a problem (no LAN functionality, I have no access to printers etc). I was wondering what you think about.
Further, does somebody know how I can revert the FW Update 5.7 and go back to 5.6?

"Sudden increase of AEBS issues? Is it linked to the latest Airport updates?"
We are not allowed to ask that question. Remember, it must, must, must be our fault - we have to be careful about that. Well, I guess that if someone who leans to the right politically, can still question the actions of the current president - then I guess it is OK for Mac lovers to question Apple - so I take back what I said at the top.
Gino

Sudden increased frequency of dropped calls

Anyone else experiencing a sudden increase in the number of dropped calls? I am in the Cleveland, Ohio area and over the last 3 weeks I have been dropping almost every call that lasts over a minute. Called AT&T, they said they are sending "engineers" to determine if there is a network problem. At the same time suggesting that the issue is with Apple. I have had my iphone for over a year and never had any trouble with dropped calls until recently.

I have had the same problem, a couple of weeks ago and then a few days ago again. Every 30 seconds or almost a minute the call will drop off. I called apple care and they said it might be something with the network, so i called AT&T and they have no idea what was happening. They told me it might be an issue with my cel. After call apple again, they ask me to do a complete restore of the device. I did it and after 2 hours of the restore process it went back to normal again. So far is working like new. So try to do that and hopefully it will work.

Can`t drag and drop foto into pages document, it bounces back

trying to drag and drop a foto from iphoteo to pages document, it doesn`t work properly and steady.
Eventually it bounces back. I repeated to do so few times, sometimes it works into an blank page or into a fotoframe, sometimes it doesn`t.
I checked camera type and other informations of the pictures,seems to be not part of the problem.
I can drag and drop fotos to the desktop without problems, all jpg.
I did drag and drop a few pictures succsesfully onto the same document or into the same fotoframe and suddenly, again it does not work.
Any help?
Andi

Try making a direct shortcut to the Organizer and then the Editor.
You should then be able to drag and drop on to the desktop icon.
On Windows right click on the desktop and select New >> Shortcut
Browse to Computer OS C:
And find the PSE Organizer application in Program Files or Program Files (x86) on Windows 7 - 64 bit.
Inside the Adobe >> Photoshop Elements Organizer (yellow folder) you are looking for an application file “PhotoshopEementsOrganizer” with six small icons (e.g. representing thumbnails - could be different in PSE5 but look for the exe file)
Select it and click OK
Click next
Rename by taking out Photoshop Elements leaving just the word Organizer
Then click finish
You should now be able to launch directly form the desktop by double clicking on the icon.
You can set up a similar direct link to the Editor application.

Weird Bounce-back of an email address that is not even in my contacts!

Hey folks,
Recently I have been getting a bounced back email from an address that is not even in my contacts (I use outlook). It's only when I send an email to a particular person. She gets the email, but I get this bounce back from a SIMILAR email. It is annoying, and confounding.
I have scanned my laptop regularly with updated McAfee and Spybot, and have found nothing. I am using Vista Home and it is all updated as well.
Thanks!
Jim

If the message is being received and you are only sending to a single address on the sending line, then I would say the error is likely on the receiver's end (maybe they have a forward setup to the bogus address?). If you could include the full headers (email addresses redacted) of the message which is bouncing back, maybe someone here can spot something and suggest something further.

Zipeg and limewire no longer functioning (both bounced back).

Greetings,
Zipeg and limewire are no longer functioning on my mac (limewire first, about 3 weeks ago). In fact, i've tried to re-downloaded both softwares but the applications will only bounce back and not functioning. Previously (2 months ago), i have a same problem with MacDJView. Any idea what's wrong with my mac?
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!

Hello n_n:
Some programs will not run if they are located outside of the "/Applications" directory on the
boot volume. I have Zipeg, but I don't have the other programs you use, so I don't know
if they will run on your second partition. My Zipeg install is on my boot drive, I've never
tried to run it on my data partition. I, like you, do have programs located on a second partition,
and every now and then I try to install one there and it will refuse to run, if it does refuse to run,
I go ahead and install it on the boot volume, however the majority of apps don't care where they
are installed.
Did you just install these apps or have they been working and just decided to quit?
Kj

Sudden increase in buffer gets per executions in update statement

Hi,
Recently we have encountered one performance issue, which is most likely caused by a sudden increase in the buffer gets per execution.
The SQL is an update statement, updating a table using a primary key (we have checked to confirm the running execution plan is using the primary key), and one field being updated is a BLOB column.
As shown in the below statistics, there is no major change in the number of executions during the every 20 minutes monitoring interval. However, the buffer gets per executions has been more than double, and the CPU time is almost doubled, hence the exec_time (elapsed time) has been doubled.
The same SQL has been running for the past four years in multiple similar databases. The database is Oracle 9.2.0.4 running on Solaris 9. For the past 300 days, the average elapsed time per execution is about 0.0093s, while the average buffer gets per execution is about 670. The update statement has been executed about 9 times per second.
The question is why there is a sudden increase in the buffer gets? The sudden increase happened twice for the past two days.
<pre>
B_TIME E_TIME EXECUTIONS_DIFF EXEC_TIME CPU_TIME BUFFER_GETS EXEC_PER_DAY
2009-11-25-14:04 2009-11-25-14:23 8513 .0069 .0068 315.56 646329
2009-11-25-14:23 2009-11-25-14:43 10170 .007 .0068 312.28 726188
2009-11-25-14:43 2009-11-25-15:05 11873 .0072 .0069 320.17 787885
2009-11-25-15:05 2009-11-25-15:23 8633 .011 .0101 844.83 675014
2009-11-25-15:23 2009-11-25-15:44 9668 .0144 .0137 1448.51 680778
2009-11-25-15:44 2009-11-25-16:04 9671 .0163 .0156 1809.04 702163
2009-11-25-16:04 2009-11-25-16:25 10260 .0188 .0177 2107.67 711447
2009-11-25-16:25 2009-11-25-16:44 9827 .0157 .0151 1834.3 739593
2009-11-25-16:44 2009-11-25-17:05 10586 .0171 .0164 2008.25 714555
2009-11-26-08:04 2009-11-26-08:24 11028 .0182 .0172 1979.61 800688
2009-11-26-08:24 2009-11-26-08:44 10533 .0154 .0149 1734.62 750248
2009-11-26-08:44 2009-11-26-09:04 9367 .018 .0168 2043.95 685274
2009-11-26-09:04 2009-11-26-09:24 10307 .0214 .0201 2552.43 729938
2009-11-26-09:24 2009-11-26-09:45 10932 .0251 .0234 3111.48 762328
2009-11-26-09:45 2009-11-26-10:05 10992 .0278 .0254 3386.41 797404
2009-11-26-15:03 2009-11-26-15:16 7183 .0425 .0348 4615.42 746824
2009-11-26-15:16 2009-11-26-15:23 2921 .0417 .0373 4887.75 682092
2009-11-26-15:23 2009-11-26-15:43 9597 .0393 .0352 4603.62 679656
2009-11-26-15:43 2009-11-26-16:03 8797 .0411 .0362 4783.66 630755
2009-11-26-16:03 2009-11-26-16:23 9957 .0453 .0391 5168.28 718100
2009-11-26-16:23 2009-11-26-16:43 11209 .0436 .0369 4870.77 808395
2009-11-26-16:43 2009-11-26-17:03 10729 .0428 .0375 5119.56 766103
2009-11-26-17:03 2009-11-26-17:23 9116 .0409 .0363 4912.58 659098
</pre>
Yesterday I did a trace on one of the sessions running the update statement, and below is the tkprof output:
<pre>
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 76 0.03 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 76 4.58 5.14 0 567843 19034 76
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 152 4.61 5.14 0 567843 19034 76
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 88
Rows Row Source Operation
1 UPDATE (cr=30 r=0 w=0 time=6232 us)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN <PK Index Name> (cr=3 r=0 w=0 time=58 us)(object id 81122)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
Waited--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL*Net message to client 152 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 152 0.00 0.22
SQL*Net more data from client 1894 0.00 0.03
SQL*Net break/reset to client 152 0.00 0.00
buffer busy waits 14 0.00 0.00
enqueue 1 0.61 0.61
</pre>
GaoYuan

Hi,
I've reformatted your output for better understanding (with {noformat}...{noformat}):
B_TIME           E_TIME           EXECUTIONS_DIFF EXEC_TIME   CPU_TIME BUFFER_GETS EXEC_PER_DAY
2009-11-25-14:04 2009-11-25-14:23            8513      .0069      .0068      315.56       646329
2009-11-25-14:23 2009-11-25-14:43           10170       .007      .0068      312.28       726188
2009-11-25-14:43 2009-11-25-15:05           11873      .0072      .0069      320.17       787885
2009-11-25-15:05 2009-11-25-15:23            8633       .011      .0101      844.83       675014
2009-11-25-15:23 2009-11-25-15:44            9668      .0144      .0137     1448.51       680778
2009-11-25-15:44 2009-11-25-16:04            9671      .0163      .0156     1809.04       702163
2009-11-25-16:04 2009-11-25-16:25           10260      .0188      .0177     2107.67       711447
2009-11-25-16:25 2009-11-25-16:44            9827      .0157      .0151      1834.3       739593
2009-11-25-16:44 2009-11-25-17:05           10586      .0171      .0164     2008.25       714555
2009-11-26-08:04 2009-11-26-08:24           11028      .0182      .0172     1979.61       800688
2009-11-26-08:24 2009-11-26-08:44           10533      .0154      .0149     1734.62       750248
2009-11-26-08:44 2009-11-26-09:04            9367       .018      .0168     2043.95       685274
2009-11-26-09:04 2009-11-26-09:24           10307      .0214      .0201     2552.43       729938
2009-11-26-09:24 2009-11-26-09:45           10932      .0251      .0234     3111.48       762328
2009-11-26-09:45 2009-11-26-10:05           10992      .0278      .0254     3386.41       797404
2009-11-26-15:03 2009-11-26-15:16            7183      .0425      .0348     4615.42       746824
2009-11-26-15:16 2009-11-26-15:23            2921      .0417      .0373     4887.75       682092
2009-11-26-15:23 2009-11-26-15:43            9597      .0393      .0352     4603.62       679656
2009-11-26-15:43 2009-11-26-16:03            8797      .0411      .0362     4783.66       630755
2009-11-26-16:03 2009-11-26-16:23            9957      .0453      .0391     5168.28       718100
2009-11-26-16:23 2009-11-26-16:43           11209      .0436      .0369     4870.77       808395
2009-11-26-16:43 2009-11-26-17:03           10729      .0428      .0375     5119.56       766103
2009-11-26-17:03 2009-11-26-17:23            9116      .0409      .0363     4912.58       659098
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse       76      0.03       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute     76      4.58       5.14          0     567843      19034          76
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total      152      4.61       5.14          0     567843      19034          76
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 88
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 UPDATE (cr=30 r=0 w=0 time=6232 us)
      1   INDEX UNIQUE SCAN <PK Index Name(cr=3 r=0 w=0 time=58 us)(object id 81122)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
SQL*Net message to client                     152        0.00          0.00
SQL*Net message from client                   152        0.00          0.22
SQL*Net more data from client                1894        0.00          0.03
SQL*Net break/reset to client                 152        0.00          0.00
buffer busy waits                              14        0.00          0.00
enqueue                                         1        0.61          0.61
********************************************************************************Can you please provide a DDL for the table, indexes, type of the tablespace(s) they reside in (ASSM/MSSM, extents sizes), the UPDATE statement, how many sessions on average/peaks are doing the same thing concurrently, how many sessions are working this table concurrently and how do they use it?

HT1338 My mail will not delete. When I move it to trash and then delete it within a few minutes it has all bounced back in again. Checked my preference settings and all seems to be in order. Any ideas how to resolve this frustrating problem?

My mail will not delete. When I move it to trash and then delete it, within a few minutes it has all bounced back in again. Checked my preference settings and all seems to be in order. Any ideas how to resolve this frustrating problem?

That sounds like a compatibility issue with an add-on that you have installed, as reported by a number of users in both Firefox 22 and Firefox 23 over the last couple of months. If you would provide a listing of your installed extensions ''(as you were prompted to do when creating this thread)'' maybe one of us can advise you which extension is the mot likely culprit. You will need to re-install Firefox 23 to do further diagnostic testing.
As far as the compatibility of Firefox 23 and Win XP SP3, Mozilla has verified they are compatible and not one user ''(including me on two separate PC's)'' has reported a problem with compatibility.

Web Gallery photos bouncing back

When sending photos from the iPhone to a Web Gallery, the message bounces back with this error:
Relaying denied, try authenticating.
I was under the impression that in order for a Web Gallery to show up on the iPhone, I had to be logged in correctly to my .mac account to begin with.
It's also worth mentioning that the Web Galleries created within iPhoto do not appear on the iPhone (Web Gallery Albums view) and vice versa. However, they all appear on the web via Safari.
Any suggestions?

Still not working this morning. Here is text from my recent error message:
+The original message was received at Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:15:21 -0700 (PDT)+
+from smtpin05-en2 [10.13.10.150]+
+----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----+
<[email protected]>
+(reason: 553 5.7.1 <[email protected]>... Relaying denied, try authenticating.)+
+----- Transcript of session follows -----+
+... while talking to [10.150.68.1]:+
DATA
+<<< 553 5.7.1 <[email protected]>... Relaying denied, try authenticating.+
+550 5.1.1 <[email protected]>... User unknown+
+<<< 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient)+
+Reporting-MTA: dns; smtpoutm.mac.com+
+Received-From-MTA: DNS; smtpin05-en2+
+Arrival-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:15:21 -0700 (PDT)+
+Final-Recipient: RFC822; [email protected]+
+Action: failed+
+Status: 5.7.1+
+Remote-MTA: DNS; [10.150.68.1]+
+Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 553 5.7.1 <[email protected]>... Relaying denied, try authenticating.+
+Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:15:28 -0700 (PDT)+
+From: Jim Little <[email protected]>+
+Date: September 17, 2007 9:15:05 AM PDT+
+To: Web Gallery <[email protected]>+

My incoming emails are bouncing back to sender. Administrator says user acct. is temporarily overflowing". I have emptied my trash as well as my inbox. This is in my iPad. Any suggestions?

My incoming emails are bouncing back to senders. Administrator says the user account is temporarily over quota. I have emptied all trash and most of the inbox and have rebooted, but still am not getting emails. Any suggestions?

have you tried deleting emails directly on your webmail? see if it works

AOL mail bounce back

I am getting bounce backs from any mail sent to an AOL account. The mail will go through if I log onto my mailbox at my ISP provider (Optimum Online). The bounce back has this message:
Reason: SMTP transmission failure has occurred
Diagnostic code: smtp;554-: (ISP:B2) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554ispb2.html TRANSACTION FAILED
Remote system: dns;mailin-01.mx.aol.com (TCP|167.206.4.199|54475|205.188.156.185|25) (rly-ya06.mx.aol.com ESMTP mailrelayin-ya6.5; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:17:46 -0400)
If I go to the aol link in the message I get this explanation;
554 ISP:B2
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554ispb2.html
EXPLANATION:
Your IP address has generated a high volume of mail to AOL which exceeded our rate limit or has generated AOL member complaints. Possible causes include a compromised or virus-infected personal computer or a non-disclosed server relaying mail within the ISP's network. Note, this block is automatically removed within 24 hours.
SOLUTION:
The IP address in question is not the connecting MTA, but is commonly the originating IP. If your originating IP is static and has valid and meaningful reverse DNS, then please contact us with that IP. If you are not sure what your originating IP address is or if you are unsure as to whether your originating IP is dynamic or static, please contact your ISP for further information regarding your type of service.
If you are sending large volumes of mail from a dynamic IP address, please contact your ISP and inquire about purchasing a static IP or business class IP address. Furthermore you can attempt to reduce the amount of email recipients sent during one session. If you are sending to a mailing list you should verify that the recipients on your list are still interested in receiving your email.
If you did not send an extraordinary amount of email, we recommend scanning your computer or network for viruses and malicious applications.
If you are an ISP receiving this error from an excessive number of your customers you may have an undisclosed proxy or relay on your network. Please contact us to resolve this issue.
I am not sending high volumes of mail to AOL unless one or two emails a day is large. This is a recent problem. Has anyone experienced this or does someone have a solution? My ISP says there is nothing they can do on their end and AOL won't talk to you unless you have a paid account.
Dan

AOL's explanation per the link provided covers your options.
* You contacted your ISP which indicated there is nothing they can do or there is nothing they are willing to do in your behalf.
* You are not sending high volumes of mail to AOL.
* You can scan your Mac for viruses and malware which can't hurt but will be a waste of time in this situation.
This leaves contacting AOL. Other than that, wait until the 24 hour block period has expired.

Sudden increase of Bounce Backs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for