Suggest a better graphics card for my mac pro mid 2010

I use my Mid 2010 Mac Pro (not macbook pro) to do very heavy visual / special effects editing for film using the programs Blender, After Effects, Premier Pro and Element 3D.  I need a graphics card with at least 3GB of VRAM but I am having a hard time finding one that isn't outrageously priced.  I would really appreciate any suggestions for cards that aren't overclocked that would have the above VRAM or greater that would work with my particular Mac Pro.  Thanks so much for any help.

How about HD7950  Mac Edition?
http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentation/product/product_index.aspx?cid=1&gid=3& sgid=1157&pid=1777&psn=&leg=0&lid=1

Similar Messages

  • Best graphics card for the MAC Pro 4,1

    I am using the 4870 card, but, is there a better graphics card for doing photography with Adobe CS5 Extended and Lightroom 3?
    Thank you.

    While recently discontinued, you can probably get your hands on an nVidia GTX 285 fairly easily. It's not only faster than your Radeon HD4870, it has double the video memory, and more importantly it's on the shortlist of cards that are support hardware acceleration of the Mercury Playback Engine in Adobe CS5. That's a HUGE feature, if you use Premiere or After Effects, it's probably worth the price of admission right there. I've got one in my machine, works wonders. Aside from a zippy system, lots of basic stuff that used to have to be rendered in order to preview no longer require it.
    The nVidia Quadro FX 4800 is also a bigger/faster card, and provides even more powerful support for the Mercury Playback Engine in CS5, but it's also vastly more expensive. As I type this the price is $1799 at Apple, and $1399 most everywhere else (Apple store managers, if you're seeing this you might want to check for a price drop).
    That's the current max, but it's possible that new graphics cards are right around the corner. In the spring nVidia introduced their next generation of GPU, there are a range of new GTX 4xx series cards on the mainstream line, and just last week new Quadro cards were launched for the high end. Adobe does not support either of them for CS5's Mercury Playback Engine hardware acceleration at this moment, but Adobe employees have said that it's coming in an update soon.
    It's also likely that the ATI Radeon HD 5770 & Radeon HD 5870 will be released for the Mac. My understanding is that the 5770 performance is on par with your HD 4870, and the 5870 will blow it away. Both the new ATI cards also boast two mini displayport plugs as well as a DVI out. Neither card is likely going to get support for hardware acceleration in CS5 anytime soon (not really Adobe's fault, ATI are still in their infancy on the high performance/OpenCL front compared to nVidia).
    My advice, if you need something now, chase down a GTX 285 and you won't be disappointed (especially in CS5). Otherwise, you may want to wait it out and jump on the next generation if/when it becomes available.
    Hope that helps!

  • Which New Graphic Card For 2008 Mac Pro?

    I'm going to buy Final Cut X, so I'll need a new graphic card for my 2008 MacPro. My current card is an ATI Radeon HD 2600.
    I asked AppleCare and they sent me a link to a lot of compatible cards (copied below).
    But it turns out that most of these cards need Windows - at least according to specs - and the rest don't have the (2) DVI-D connections I need - so which card should I buy?
    The card has to work with my 2 Acer P243W 24" screens at 1920 x 1200 @ 60 Hz.
    Here's Apple's list:
    •    NVIDIA
    o    GeForce 320M
    o    GeForce GT 330M
    o    GeForce 9400M
    o    GeForce 9600M GT
    o    GeForce 8600M GT  Note: OpenCL compatible, but does not meet system requirements for Final Cut Pro X, Motion 5 and Compressor.
    o    GeForce GT 120
    o    GeForce GT 130
    o    GeForce GTX 285
    o    GeForce 8800 GT
    o    GeForce 8800 GS
    o    Quadro FX 4800
    o    Quadro FX5600
    •    ATI
    o    Radeon HD 4670
    o    Radeon HD 4850
    o    Radeon HD 4870
    o    Radeon HD 5670
    o    Radeon HD 5750
    o    Radeon HD 5770

    Once you look at what is sold, limits the list. None of those listed require Windows though. What specs? I don't see any specs. And of course nothing listed are Windows, that would be strange. Why you pasted notebook and iMac graphic adapters... unless Apple is selling FCPX for Windows.
    Forget the GT120 though some use it with FCPX and are okay with it, save a little though I think 5770 has more processing, bandwidth and of course 1GB DDR5.
    support for 6870 PC card is looking like a possible option now, too.
    It is more mainly just 5770 vs 5870. Or Quadro 4000.
    Amazon has PNY Mac Pro edition $790 vs Apple's $1195 for same card
    PNY Quadro 4000 2 GB DDR5 Mac Pro
    When FCX came out we had a couple threads on same topic.
    Apple Graphics Cards
    OSX and Graphics Cards
    Radeon 6870 3DMark 30% gain on 5870
    Flashed PC Radeon HD5870 Mac Pro 2008
    Flashed PC Radeon HD5870 Mac Pro 2008 - dual DVI works
    I include the above for same reason why when the 4870 came out, PC card was 1/2 price and $450 for 5870? really? when XFX and Saffire are under $199.
    Radeon 5870 vs 5770 GTX 285 4870
    Three Video Displays one card
    Display Adapters Needed

  • Best Graphic Card for a Mac Pro

    I am buying a Mac Pro very soon but i am still wondering about what kind of grahics card i should get? I will be doing lots of after effects and maya along with photoshop. I heard the X1900 is a good way to go? Any ideas on what i should get or is the best for me?

    You've got two choices.
    The X1900 (ATI) and the Nvidia Quadro FX 4500.
    The ATI is $299. The Nvidia is $2000.
    All around performance wise, the X1900 is usually faster then the FX4500. It's a more general purpose card, which I find works great in Photoshop and Cinema 4D (3D modeling). The FX 4500 is designed for high-accuracy complex models- usually that of a mechanical CAD drawing or something in engineering.
    Regardless, the FX 4500 is far too expensive for what you get over the X1900, which is relatively nothing in your case. The '1900 is cheaper and faster for your uses.
    If you've got money to spend, I'd suggest ether more RAM, or loading your Mac Pro up with hard drives (I personally use 4*500GB in two 500GB RAID0 arrays for redundancy).
    -SC

  • 2nd graphics card for 2008 Mac Pro 3.1

    I need to connect a third monitor to my 2008 Mac Pro 3.1 - 2.8/8 core - so I can view and control Logic from my vocal booth. I don't want a monster card. Just the bare minimum. The monitor will only be on when I'm recording by myself. I appreciate suggestions and any warnings of pssible problems.
    Thanks for the help.

    ATI Radeon 5770
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC742ZM/A
    http://www.amazon.com/Apple-ATI-Radeon-5770-MC742ZM/dp/B003Z6QH6M
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/726537-REG/Apple_MC742ZM_A_ATI_Radeon_HD_5 770.html
    How To Install and Remove Memory Mac Pro
    https://support.apple.com/kb/HT4433
    2x2GB FBDIMM DDR2 667MHz @ $32http://www.amazon.com/BUFFERED-PC2-5300-FB-DIMM-APPLE-Memory/dp/B002ORUUAC/
    Hardware Monitor
    http://www.bresink.com/osx/HardwareMonitor.html

  • Graphics Card for my Mac Pro...

    I use CS3 for graphic and web design. I currently use a DC2.3 PPC and sometimes in InDesign the graphics really labour the card/processor to preview all the effects.
    Is this handled by the graphics card or is it processor intensive?
    Should I get the stock ATI 2600 with my new Mac Pro or the NVIDIA 8800? Will the 8800 be faster or do you only see a benefit with 3D rendering?

    I can tell you this about the ATI cards because I have had two now. I'm now using the ATI X1900 with 512ram and under Tiger it worked well, under Leopard it has been aa nightmare. Random graphic splotches, overheating (I must blow out any dust on a near weekly basis), I must use fan controlling software, and the screen does not come up without at least one line streak if not several. I had Apple replace the card but it seems to be a prevailing problem with many who use the ATI card. I'm about to CTO a new MacPro 3.2GHz machine and will probably go with the NVIDIA 8800 hoping to be relieved of the ATI graphics problems. Just a head's up to those of you who are toying with the idea of opting for the ATI graphics card.
    John

  • Replacement graphics card for 2006 Mac Pro?

    My Mac Pro is a dual-core Intel Xeon, model 1,1 purchased in 2006. The graphics card is doing death throes. I can't afford a new computer, so I need to replace the graphics card.
    Can I use any PCI express x16 card, or are my options restricted? (They were at the time - there was a choice of two.) If my options are restricted, what cards can I buy?
    Thanks,
    Pam

    ATI 4870 is your best bet. Ignore what apple says about it not being supported; it is.
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB999ZM/A?mco=ODc4ODk3MQ

  • What Graphics card for Intel Mac Pro early 2007?

    I have a Nvidia 7300 GT Graphics Card at present, but if I were to replace it now what card would I be able to replace it with? I heard the Nvidia Geforce 8800GT is a good alternative! is this still the case?
    Your advice would be much appreciated.
    Regards Denis
    I think I may have posted in the wrong area sorry Denis
    Message was edited by: Denisimo

    Thanks Hatter, Re X1900's They are on the UK site too at £264.00 I expect they are hoping some unsuspecting user will still be daft enough to buy them not having been made aware of the problems now evident some way down the line

  • ATT 600 for a Mac Pro - Mid 2010?

    I understand I can use an HD with this spec. Is that true?
    TIA

    If you insist on using *TLAs, you need to be sure you are getting them right. If uncertain, spell out the words for maximum understanding and no mistakes.
    Mac Pro (tower) uses Serial ATA drives. Any size as long as you initialize them for use as Mac Volumes using GUID partition Table. A Fast 1TB drive for your Mac can be had for under US$100. Do not use Green drives for anything that needs performance, they are fine for Backups.
    Drives labeled ATA or Parallel ATA use a 40-pin ribbon cable and will not work in your Mac.
    * Three Letter Acronyms

  • Is a dedicated graphics card better than an integrated graphics card for running Logic Pro?

    I am trying to figure out if a dedicated graphics card is better than an integrated graphics card for using Logic Pro. I have heard opinions supporting both. From what I have been told a Mac mini with an integrated graphics card would work just fine. I have also heard that a modest dedicated graphics card could also benefit Logic Pro. Honestly, I have heard more people saying that the integrated graphics card on the Mac mini would do the job. But still, I have heard a couple people (even 2 senior Mac experts) state that a dedicated graphics card (iMac) is the way to go. Maybe a Mac mini with integrated graphics card will do the job, but an iMac would do the job better, I don't know, if anyone could help me I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you.

    One thing is Logic Pro and another thing is Final Cut Pro. Logic Pro is a music production app, so it doesn't use the GPU heavily and you can use it with an integrated GPU without any problem. However, video editing apps like Final Cut Pro or iMovie will note the difference

  • How does having 2 Graphics Cards in a Mac pro help if it doesnt have something like Crossfire??

    Hi,
    I am thinking of buying a Mac pro for visual effects & graphics work.
    My question is quite simple, what are the benifits of having to graphic cards in a Mac Pro,
    For instance, i am thinking of putting in a Quadro 4000 with a 5870 in my mac pro.
    now is it possible for me to set say the ATI 5870 for powering my display and my Quadro 4000 for graphic processing tasks such as rendering stuff, and so on and so forth.
    Any thouights will be great.
    Cheers.
    Ani

    You need to find a way to add 3rd aux power connector.
    Mac Pro only comes with a mere 2 6-pin connectors, not a lot of power.
    Apple has had multiple problems with Nvidia drivers, with support, with say using two 4000s together, which sounds nice and makes more sense (and especially if one wants to run Windows at all where mixing ATI and Nvidia use to be against all the rules, now it seems like it is an Apple issue).
    Yes, there can be processing improvements, Adobe Mercury Engine for one, CUDA still has advantage over ATI-Apple OpenCL.

  • 4K Monitor and Display card for a Mac Pro 2012.

    I am looking for a 4K monitor and a Display Card for my Mac Pro 2012. Do you guys recommend any that is presently available in market?

    <http://store.apple.com/us/product/HA959LL/A/nvidia-quadro-k5000-gpu-for-mac>

  • Sound Card for the Mac Pro

    Hello,
    I've searched around but can't seem to find any definitive answer to buying a sound card for my Mac Pro. I want to plug in a guitar and microphone for garageband and voice overs on FCP. Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Jake

    Best look for usb/fw audio interfaces which can be inexpensive and easy to get up an running.
    There are many many cards on the market all depending on how many I/O you are chasing and overall sonic results.
    If your in the market for entry level cards - check out
    www.m-audio.com
    www.focusrite.com
    www.digidesign.com
    or
    if your in the semi-pro market, look at www.rme-audio.com (mainly the fireface series)
    My pick if you are an entry level user wanting a great 2in/2out interface, have a look at the Duet by Apogee.
    http://www.apogeedigital.com/
    (I use all their top end pro kit and can tell you they are a very good company in both product and support)

  • Graphics card crash on Mac Pro RAID

    I've had a very odd issue with a Mac Pro RAID running SL client.
    The Mac Pro serves files to a small network of Macs and is usually very reliable, however I was archiving and moving around a lot of files (over 100gb) overnight and when I returned next day, the monitor that the Mac pros connected to wouldn't show the desktop screen.
    The monitor had power, and the Mac was turned on, still serving files as normal and had not crashed in any way.
    I VNC'ed into this Mac and the desktop appeared, and looking in system profiler the video card wasn't there.
    A restart sorted it out.
    This has happened a few times and it's always when a large file copy is in progress overnight. The screen is switched off overnight by default.
    I've thought the graphics card (ATI Radeon HD 5870) maybe overheated, so I cleaned the inside of the Mac of dust (it was a bit dusty but not much), but the problem remains, always when a large file copy takes place.
    The past couple of times this has happened I couldn't even VNC into the Mac and had to restart it remotely using the terminal.
    I've seen this article from Apple, but the video card cables are connected as normal:
    Mac Pro (Mid 2010): Black screen after installing ATI Radeon HD 5870
    My next steps are a hardware test, but would that test the video card?
    Any help much appreciated.

    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4208248?tstart=0
    Want to play safe w/ Apple ATI 5770 or play with PC flash/injector just to save $$

  • I have a Mac pro(1 free bay) and a mac mini I need to back both of them  Is it better to use an external NAS HD or an internal hard drive on my mac pro (mid 2010) What option has the faster GB/s?

    I have a Mac pro(1 free bay) and a mac mini I need to back up both of them (time machine)  Is it better to use an external NAS HD or an internal hard drive on my mac pro (mid 2010)
    What option has the faster GB/s?

    Disk drive using native SATA bus interface will allow the drive to copy and always present and ready.
    But once you have backup any hourly changes should be smaller and as long as the NAS and your switch should allow enough.
    You should always have off line backups and don't rely on just one backup set or just TimeMachine.
    WD RED models are designed for RAID and NAS and 7.2k instead of your more standard slower green 5400 rpm green models while still costing less than WD Blacks.
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008JJLW4M/
    How to clone your system:
    http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-HowToClone-backup.html
    http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-HowToClone.html
    http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/7032/carbon-copy-cloner
    Using Cloning as a Backup Strategy
    http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/7032/carbon-copy-cloner
    http://www.bombich.com/software/updates/ccc-3.5.html
    Clone to internal, TimeMachine to NAS is one way to go at it.

Maybe you are looking for