Suggestions required!!

this is not a query i am posting. it wasjust an idea i had and was wondering what other prog. might think of it.
java has an extensive library and still is not used to build standalone client applications. this is because an exe file is not generated but yu have a class file which has to be compiled which makes it slow for apps. what if there was a way by which a prog. could write code for an app. which during installation on the client machine would link with the jre and create a standalone exe file. thus increasing speed !! then yu could actually write code for various apps which could be distributed across various platforms in class file format and get compiled to faster exe. these would be like jsp files slow during the first use but once installed as fast as normal applications. these apps would not be like internet applications but standard desktop applications.
what do yu guys think?

There are ofcourse a lot of applications written in Java and Java is used many times for standalone application development. But an Executable is not created because we already have an executable which can be used, i.e. java.exe. I think this could be because, java code is intended to do least harm to the system. This is ensured through a comprehensive set of Permission Checks and so on. If we were to create an executable, these checks cannot be done. If you say, why not create an executable which also does this checks, we already have one (java.exe). Also java programs follow runtime linking for which the Microsoft equivalent is use of DLL's and the Unix Equivalent is use of .so's. So if we were to create an application, we would create and exe, but if the same application is re-used, then we need a DLL. May be, some one thought in Sun Labs, why all these complications, lets keep the things simple. This could be the reason why we cant get an executable built out of Java.

Similar Messages

Suggestions required on All-In-One System

Dear Guru's,
We're having 2 doubt's regarding All-in-One system,
1. Shall we have 2 system landscape for All-in-One systems. System1(DEV Server)-having single instance with 2 clients 100 - DEV and 200 - QAS and System2(PRD server) having single instance with one client 100-PRD.
2. In our Server, we deployed All-in-One component for country specific of Arabic, is it possible to have another country specific of India in the same server on different client. (100 - Arabic and 200 - India).
Your valuable suggestions required for the above 2 queries.
Thanks in advance.
regards,
Guna

Hi,
I guess the better approach is to raise a OSS message.
Regards,
Karthik D

I want to purchase a new cinema display suggestion required

Respected Readers
i want to purchase a new cinema display suggestion required please guide me which on is good LCD , LED ,TFT, or any other i want to use it for color calibration help me i need it badly i have already 30 inch hd cinema display is it fine other or some other

You only have two choices. The 24" Cinema Display and the 30" Cinema Display. Whichever one best fits your budget and needs, get that.

Suggestions Required While Doing Idoc To File Scenario

Hi All,
My scenario is Idoc To File. I have to take the Purchase Order Idoc from system "A" and send it as a XML file to system"B".
The problem here is, i have three types of PO Idoc's with different fields.
1) Purchase Order (Fields : PO Number, date, vendor, material and quantity)
2) Delivery with serial number ( Fields : delivery number, est date, vendor, material, serial and quantity)
3) Delivery using serial number with subcontracting repair ( Fields :
PO Number, date, vendor, material, serial and quantity).
I have to convert all the above PO Idoc's into Xml file format and send it to system "B".
Here i have three different Idocs one per Purchase Order , one per Delivery with serial number and one per Delivery using serial number with subcontracting repair .
My question is, shall i need to create three different scenario's for the above requirement or shall i create only one scenario with all the fileds in file structure.
Is it possible by creating only scenario, to handle the above situation. If so where can i handle the conditions saying that the File Structure
for Purchase Order should be (With Fields : PO Number, date, vendor, material and quantity) ,
for Delivery with serial number should be (With Fields : delivery number, est date, vendor, material, serial and quantity) and
for Delivery using serial number with subcontracting repair should be ( With Fields : PO Number, date, vendor, material, serial and quantity).
Please provide the solution for the above situation.
And suggest me which is the best method to follow.
Regards,
Venkat.

Prasad,
My requirement is i will process only one Idoc at a time either it may be Purchase order or Delivery with serial number or Delivery using serial number with subcontracting repair . So no chance of multiple targets. For example
First time i may process Idoc related to Purchase Order then at that time only fields ( PO Number, date, vendor, material and quantity) should convert into Xml file and pass it to system "B".
Second time i may process Idoc related to Delivery with serial number then at that time only fields ( delivery number, est date, vendor, material, serial and quantity) should convert into Xml file and pass it to system "B".
Third time i may process Idoc related to Delivery using serial number with subcontracting repair then at that time only fields ( PO Number, date, vendor, material, serial and quantity) should convert into Xml file and pass it to system "B".
In all the cases the target is same "B" system.
I think now it is clear.
Regards,
Venkat.

Suggestions required for transferring cost from GL account to a Project

Hi,
We have a requirement where we want to transfer cost captured in GL to PA in a specific project.
For example:
Incurred a misc cost 100 (outside project) and posted to GL (a/c 600010)
Dr 60010, Cr 120010
Later, realized this should be absorbed as a project cost (a/c 220010)
We need some mechanism to capture cost in project ABC such that Dr 220010, Cr 600010
If we use Web ADI to upload 'Costed' transactions: Dr 220010 Cr <NULL> (GL Transfer Status - Accepted)
If we use Web ADI to upload 'Accounted' transaction: Dr 220010 Cr 600010 (GL Transfer Status - Received), but in this case the entry is no passed to GL, to nullify the a/c balance in 600010
Appreciate suggestions from experts, to address the requirement.
Ashutosh

Hi
You can reverse the transaction posted in GL.
Then load the amount to Projects, as costed, not accounted EI.
When distributing the cost in PA it will generate the right accounting, and you could interface it to GL.
Dina

Cisco ISE Deployment suggestion required

Require Assistance on Cisco ISE Deployment for below scenario
-- We have Three Cisco ISE Appliances and Client has taken Advance Subscription License for 500 users
-- Client has DC & DR and needs to deploy the Cisco ISE in one Main Office which connects to DC & DR on MPLS Links
-- Client suggestion was to deploy one ISE node ( Admin + M&T + Policy Server ) in DC and its Standby Secondary in DR
     and only deploy Policy Server in Main Office.
     Idea behind the design is that ,
     1) If DC fails , Cisco ISE related logs will get generated on DR and any Cisco ISE related request will be taken care by Local Policy Server in Main Office .
      2) If Local Policy Server Fails , then ISE node in DC will act as Secondary backup and DR will act Teritary Backup
      below is view
                                     DC
                        Primary Node with Role
                   [Admin , M&T , Policy Server]
                                                                                                             Main Remote Offic
                                                                                                              Cisco ISE Node ( Only Policy Server) -----------> Network Devices
                               DR
                       Secondary   Node with Role
                   [Admin , M&T , Policy Server]
Please let me know is it possible

Yes, The scenario is quite achievable also please review the below link for assistance on deployment of ISE.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns744/docs/howto_50_ise_deployment_tg.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/install_guide/ise10_deploy.pdf

Suggestion required in target table structure change

Hi all good morning,
I have one requirement. I have a target table T with some coulmns. Now I need to add one additional column to T and one procedure is there to populate the data for new column. This target table T is used by 50 mappings.my questions is if we change the structure of the table do we need to import(I think we must import). If we import what could be the impact of this re-import. do we need to rebound and validate alla the mappings and then deploy?
the other possibility what I can do is I will create a replica of T as T1 with one additional column. I will create a new mapping which dumps data from T to T1and I will replace my T with T1 in my reporting environment.
pls suggest which is good one. it is urgent.
thanks in advance.
Viki

Hello, if you don't need the new column in the 50 mappings, you can temporarily leave them alone (you say it's urgent), and just feed the new col..
When you have more time, you should reconcile the mappings with table T and re-deploy them. OMBPlus scripting is ideal for this task.
Hope this helps, Antonio

Ur suggestion required

Hi All
As per my requirement..my application should pop up a window(with log message) in a regular time interval (Built using Form 6i, oracle 10g,Unix). Using timer i am able to do it. But timer is form level and there are 80 forms. The only solution i have is to change all the forms to create a timer and when_timer_expired trigger .
Please suggest some alternatives which will avoid change to all the forms.
regards,
Satya

Subclassing doesn't help you in avoiding changing the 80 forms. You still have to change all of them. The only benefit of subclassing is that if any subsequent changes are necessary, you can change the source object and only recompile all the subclassed forms to have them pick up the changes.
This is not very usefull for a trigger with a single line of code. If anything is going to change in the future it is the implementation of the shared procedure, not the single line calling the procedure.
You're code seems reasonable, although I would advice not to code it directly in the triggers. What if it needs a change in the future?
Create two procedures in a shared PLL library (or two procedures in a package in a PLL). Put your code in these two procedures. Then attach the PLL to your form(s) and add calls to the procedures in the appropriate triggers.
One other thing; I would never suggest using full paths in a call_form statement. You never know when this location is going to change. It's much more flexible to just do a call_form('dept.fmx'). Be sure to setup the FORMS_PATH correctly at the Forms server to have it search in the appropriate directories.
This approach can also be used to use the same form in a test and production environment. The two environments can be setup to look in a different path by manipulating the FORMS_PATH. In your example they would always look at the same directory.
PS. Remember that you code starts the timer to trigger 30 minutes after starting the form. Note what happens when the user starts a form, then after 25 minutes starts another form. The second form will start a new trigger and the "popup" will only appear once the whole session is 55 minutes old.
Also when you used call_form to open the second form, the focus will return to the first form when the user exits the second form. By then the timer of the first form probably has expired and will fire immediately.

ISE installation Suggestion required

Dear All,
This is sarveswaran and am working as a network engineer.
We have recently bought the ISE server and one 2504 WLC and two 3650 WLC.
Below are the agenda
Install the access points into the floor on the 3650 WLC and through the ISE authentication should takes place. Also we wanted to restrict the wireless access only to Domain users.
For Guest users, the authentication should takes place in the ISE. once validated, the guest will need to get the internet from 2504 WLC which we placed into the DMZ Zone. The reason why is to make sure the guest user doesnt want to enter into the network.
Whether ISE supports NIC redundancy, other than CIMC.
Expecting your feedback/suggestion and let me know if required any additional information.

Please refer
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-3/admin_guide/b_ise_admin_guide_13/b_ise_admin_guide_sample_chapter_010011.html
and
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11863271/ise-redundant-nics

Order BOM functionality suggestions required

Hi Gurus
I have a very immediate required question on a new functionality at my client place. My client had given a master data BOM and wanted to edit the BOM based on the customer requirement and selected BOM components should get transferred to MRP for the planning.
So BOM is already maintained and based on the order , Order BOM should be maintained. So after fixing the order BOM components should get transferred for planning. Please Suggest this scenario with all the tcodes and configuration involved .

Hi,
Order BOMS are to be used in a MTO scenario if the components are to be transferred to planning.
No additional customization are required for order bom, following steps are to be followed
(1) Create a master bom - CS01
(2) Create a sales order - VA01
(3) Create Order BOM - CS61 (you can refer to the master bom & copy the relevant components)
(4) Execute MRP - MD50/MD02
(5) System shall generate the planned order & it shall have the components assigned in the order BOM
I hope this addresses your query
Warm regards,
Umesh

Order Type for Item Demo - Suggestion Required

Hi Gurus,
My client has a specific requirement of capturing items issued in Demo terms to their customers. The business process is that they issue an item, say a new photocopier to the customer for 15 days as demo. If the customer is satisfied, he will confirm that he buys the photocopier. And if he do not want it he returns it back. The requirement to be captured is that:
a. A separate Order Management Transaction Type to be created (ex. Demo Issues)
b. Whenever an item is issued through this sales order type, the COGS to be hit should be a different account, like a Items on Demo account. It should not hit the normal COGS account as this is not considered as sales.
c. When the customer accepts the item, then need to do a RMA to take the item back to the inventory (virtually) and create a normal sales order and follow shipping. And if the customer returns it back, then only a RMA to be done. When doing RMA, it has to again credit the Items on Loan account the debit the Inventory.
d. A report to be made in order to show a statement of items sent on Demo and received back.
This is the requirement of the client. Can you please suggest me on
1. How to configure the account generator or SLA to hit the Items on Loan account instead of the normal COGS account for this specific transaction type.
2. Is there any other better way of capturing the above business process in Order Management?
Waiting for your suggestion. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Prasad Dhanakodi

HI
Planned order in REM is of PE type thar s non convertible in PO and also these planned orders are assigned to PVs thru Planning table and the Confirmation is done agianst these planned orders.
check these links:
Re: order type in repetitive manufacturing
http://www.sapfunctional.com/PP/REM/page1.htm
Regards
Anupam Sharma

COST ROLLUP SUGGESTION REQUIRED

Hi Gurus,
I got a requirement where i need to add three type of 'Planned Cost' to the material at the time of 'Cost rollup' by using Costing sheet.
These costs are - 'Discharge Cost' (Plant Specific), Freight (material specific) & local freight (material specific & it is also on need).
For meeting the requirement i created two type of 'Overhead Percentrage' i.e. D100(discharge cost)- this is having dependency D020 (Valuation type & Plant), & F100 (Freight Cost)- this is having dependency D010 (Valuation type & overheaad key).
But i am unable to plant for third cost i.e. local freight which may or may not be involve in 'Cost rollup'.
Please suggest in meeting this requirement & reply me any other information required.
Thanks
Sandeep

Hi,
Regaiding non working of origin group- example: i am having finished material 'A' which is made by material 'B', this material 'B' is there in both plant 1 & 2. if material 'B' moves from Plant 1 to Plant 2 then we need to capture 'Freight' (planned value), in this scenario if we use origin group is working fine as material is moving from plant 1 to plant 2 but when material 'A' is made by material 'B' from plant 1 itself, it will capture 'freight' which is wrong because there is no movement. And we cannot change every time material master data.
Red solution- value in material master: is it possible for you to give step by step solution along with tcode or path, as i don't know how to configure, it will be really gr8 help for me.
Thanks

Fixed dial for one specific international number suggestion required

Hi,
We have a requirement that one of our client require to configure one fixed number like 6666 for one international Help-desk number. In CUCM, they want to configure this number. Second thing they are acquiring, is it possible that when any person dial 6666 call goes out respectively from their local router. Not from their HO router.
Regards,
Humza Khan

Hi,
I tried with translation pattern, call is routing from HO router, not from remote side router. I assigned css which contains outbound calls partitions of all remote & HO sides. But all in vain.
Any Suggestions.
Regards,
Humza Khan

Design Suggestions Required for Message Center functionality

Hi All,
I am looking for some suggestion, for one of the requirement for my customer.
Requirement is as below.
Customer wants to have a Message Center, where in, user will be able to send a message to another another user with some content and with or without attachment. they should be able to send multiple attachment as well.
The message which users are sharing with each other should be in the conversation mode. Like for One topic or subject if a users ha sent a message to another user, the same content should be in the conversation mode and an email should be sent to other users
with he content and attachments.
In addition to above, all the messages exchanged should be stored below in the tabular format.

Discussion board does serves the purpose. But how we can control the item level permission. For example, if we wantto show items which are relevant to user who is logged in, i mean show items based on the logged in user ?

Usage of CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN SAP Help Link and Suggestions Required

This is regarding CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN fm
Currently we are using function module crm_order_maintain outside Loop i.e calling once for all the contracts as sap crm performance standard ,
Is there any standard documentation where we can find that states CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN should be only used outside loop,
As some are telling us to use in Loop Endloop because of timeout error in background job with contract having 180 line items,Which i feel that this create unneccessary load on execution (Not Recommendable)
Please share any comments and suggestion this and also provide me the SAP Help Link on this

Hi,
for example to you, look for FM CRM_LRP_APPOINTMENTS_GET_DIAG which using CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN and parameter it_appointment.
Hope this helps.
Regards, Kostya Khveshchenik

Want to move to SAP BW. Suggestion required

Presently I am working in India in the Data Warehousing area as Business Analyst. I have considerable functional experience and very good exposure to Supply Chain. Apart from that I have some exposure to BAAN ERP package. I would like to move to SAP BW. I have access to SAP BW and want to move to SAP BW. Can any want suggest what kind of role I can fit into?

Hi,
I think in most of BW Projects only 1 or 2 developers will be alloted to it. So most of the time you have to handle all things.
When comparing BW project with other DW projects, It is very pretty and easy job. If you have functional knowledge in the learning phase of BW ,It is very good.
So try to learn all things like Extraction,Modelling,Reporting,some sort of Sytem maintanance. And I think Work in Each part is dependent on other parts. i.e Modeling and Reporting are mutually dependent to each other.
With rgds,
Anil

Suggestions required!!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for