Summarization ( max number in fi reached)

Hi Gurus,
When i try to post goods issue in outbound delivery, it gives me an error max number in fi reached. then i customize for fi summarization. i made a customizing in OBYC work area VBRK and BSEG- MATNR.
But it still gives me the same error. Which work area do i have to customize in obyc?
PLease can you guide me ?

Now i get this error
Error in FI data compression
    Message no. F5843
Diagnosis
    The data in the FI document should be summarized via field ''. However,
    the system could not find this field in the internal structure (see
    'LFACIGEN').
System response
    This error stems from inconsistencies between the data base tables of
    the FI document and the internal summarization structure.
Procedure
    Start program 'SAPFACCG', in order to reset the internal structure, and
    then check whether field '' is in 'LFACIGEN'. enthalten ist.
I have checked and it is not empty. what can i do?

Similar Messages

Error "max number in fi reached"?

Hi Friends,
Our scanario is sales order related production in MTO ,
when I try to backflush accotding to palned order,it gives me an error "max number in fi reached",
Sap gives suggestion for summarization FI document ,But i dont want to delete the material number.
because my business need information based on all consumed material(for request of auditors),
Thanks in advance for your attention,
Azam

Hi
FI documents have a limitation of having only 999 line items. Hence you would have to reduce the no of material line items in your process to fit this.
Hope this helps
Thanks
Anupam Murarka

LDAP "ServerListener" stops responding (Max number of connections reached)

Hi --
The last four work days, in the evening, our OAS 10G server stopped processing portal logon requests. The response to login requests was this message:
Internal error WWC-00006 Unexpected error
encountered in wwsec_app_priv.process)signon
(User-Defined Exception) (WWC-41417)
An exception was raised when accessing the
Oracle Internet Directory 81: Can't contact
LDAP server. Details:
Operation dbms_ldap.simple_bind_s (The message also included other details such as the host, port and DN, and a reference to error message WWC-41743.)
Suspecting an LDAP problem, we looked on the server, and in ORACLE_HOME/LDAP/LOG I found recent log files (oidldapd[instance]s[pid].log) with several megs of messages that look like this:
2005/06/17:17:59:33 * ServerListener :2 * ERROR :
ServerListener : Max numbers of connections reached.
Num Conns = 874, Max Conns = 874, Closing the
connection. These messages repeated, several times per minute, overnight and the next day until I restarted the server. The same thing happened again the next night.
A metalink search pointed to docid "293391.1" which, in part, suggests that the problem may be caused by improper programming, and that the solution may be to, "investigate the applications that connect to OID and where possible modify them to perform an explicit disconnect."
Does anyone have any reference to how an application can perform an explicit disconnect from the OID? We do have a relatively new application which follows the "Java API for Oracle Internet Directory" -- documention found here: http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/network.920/a96577/oid_java.htm -- but in that document we cannot find any reference for how to "perform an explicit disconnect".
The application already calls the "context.close()" method, which according to the documentation closes the connection to the OID, but we cannot find any other "explicit disconnect". And, since the problem happens even though our app is already calling the context.close(), there must be something else.
Opened this up as a Metalink question related to Portal, but they said it's not their problem, and we should ask over here.
Any thoughts?

Looks like that's helped. While the errors persist, OID isn't dieing.
For anyone with similar problems, it looks like docid 437493.1 is useful. Upgrade clients to at least 10.2.0.3 to defeat a sqlnet problem.
Just tried it with the 10.2.0.5 patchset and it seems to be working and not generating the 104 error on the OID server.

Max Number Errors Reached but all components were successful

Hello All,<o:p></o:p>
I have a package in which I have an Execute Package Task that in turn controls a bunch of other packages. I have one (I have disabled all but
a couple others) where the entirety of the package appears to run successfully (all green) but the Execute Package Task itself is failing with the error "Warning:
SSIS Warning Code DTS_W_MAXIMUMERRORCOUNTREACHED. The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (3) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure.
This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors." <o:p></o:p>
I increased the Max number of errors on the Execute Project Task "Load ARZ Demographics to Stage" to 100 but I still get the same error
-- Apparently, the max number it's seeing (1) is not on this task but I also changed the numbers of the package that this task calls. I am flummoxed as to where SSIS is seeing that the limit of 1 is set.
Thanks kindly,
Mike

Hello All,<o:p></o:p>
I have a package in which I have an Execute Package Task that in turn controls a bunch of other packages. I have one (I have disabled all but
a couple others) where the entirety of the package appears to run successfully (all green) but the Execute Package Task itself is failing with the error "Warning:
SSIS Warning Code DTS_W_MAXIMUMERRORCOUNTREACHED. The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (3) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure.
This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors." <o:p></o:p>
I increased the Max number of errors on the Execute Project Task "Load ARZ Demographics to Stage" to 100 but I still get the same error -- Apparently,
the max number it's seeing (1) is not on this task but I also changed the numbers of the package that this task calls. I am flummoxed as to where SSIS is seeing that the limit of 1 is set.
Thanks kindly,
Mike
before this error there might be some warning messages posted in execution results page. Please post that. or else message with red mark (error msg) will be posted.
- please mark correct answers

When i try to sign in icloud with different id it says max number of free accounts reached for this device what shall i do

PLease help me.....i wanna sign in icloud with different account but it says max number of free acconts reached

Somehow your Apple ID/iCloud account has been used on multiple iOS devices and exceeded the maximum. We have no way of knowing which devices. We are users like you on this forum.

Maximum number of items reached in FI

Hi,
How to avoid the situation(error)
Po raised for some 300 line items.
PO consists of 3-4 header conditions and all the conditions are linked to a differrent GL account all together.
GR to be done against PO.
System fails to post the document because of the error 'max no of items reached in FI(since counter limit for accounting document lines is 999).
This is most likey to happen frequently in my requirement since the POs are often consisting of 200-300 line items and alsmost 2-3 conditions minimum.
In addition to that we have thought of going for purchase account management which means that effectively 2 more additional postings in GR.
So all in all for every line in PO there could be atleast 6-8 accounting entries getting generated at the time of MIGO or any goods movement.
This very commonly happens in Sales issues also and in Invoicng also.
I have raised this issue earlier also but could not got any concrete answer.
Many suggested to go in for split GR but how far that is advicable.
There is summerization option but I am really not getting any que out of some notes I read and some forum postings I read.
Can anyone suggest me a simple step by step approach for achieving this and basically how it works and would be helpful for me.
I repeat and request you all to help me in this.If someone has already done this then please share the knowledge.
Regards,
arjman

Hi
Please check OSS note 36353. This is based on summarization/deletion of certain information like material number in FI documents, which will not impact other modules.
Hope this is useful
S Jayaram

Maximum number of items reached in FI--help required please

Hi,
How to avoid the situation(error)
Po raised for some 300 line items.
PO consists of 3-4 header conditions and all the conditions are linked to a differrent GL account all together.
GR to be done against PO.
System fails to post the document because of the error 'max no of items reached in FI(since counter limit for accounting document lines is 999).
This is most likey to happen frequently in my requirement since the POs are often consisting of 200-300 line items and alsmost 2-3 conditions minimum.
In addition to that we have thought of going for purchase account management which means that effectively 2 more additional postings in GR.
So all in all for every line in PO there could be atleast 6-8 accounting entries getting generated at the time of MIGO or any goods movement.
This very commonly happens in Sales issues also and in Invoicng also.
I have raised this issue earlier also but could not got any concrete answer.
Many suggested to go in for split GR but how far that is advicable.
There is summerization option but I am really not getting any que out of some notes I read and some forum postings I read.
Can anyone suggest me a simple step by step approach for achieving this and basically how it works and would be helpful for me.
I repeat and request you all to help me in this.If someone has already done this then please share the knowledge.
Regards,
arjman

Hi,
The issue what you mentioned is really a very painful and most complex one which we are also researching. OSS suggested a OSS note and it didn't work. Yes, as you said, we have that issue in MIRO for now....I am afraid, it would comeup in MIGO as well, then, I will have no sleep, for sure....suprizingly, OSS is working very slow on this issue to my surprize. The OSS note doesn't clearly specify what to and how to summarize. We have different issues in MIRO....one for number of tax lines exceeding 500 lines...and GR/IR lines exceeding on another end...we thought if we can't fix tax lines, at least we can work on GR/IR lines but neither one is successful....We have this issue in ECC 5 for the past 3 months...with real good expert in each functional space in the team, we couldn't fix it yet!!!
just FYI

Max number of orders

Hi,
I am working on ECC 6.0.
I have been trying to use the Max number of orders for a Z condition type .
The Max number of orders it is not working even after reaching the max order even after reaching the max order. If anyone has faced such an issue before kindly help.
I had set the limits for pricing in the VK11 - additional data- Max number of order But of no use.
Thanks
Manoj

hi,
pl check if the conditin update field in the condition type definition is ticked or not at V/06.
regards
sadhu kishore

Max. no. of sessions reached - using ITS on WAS

Hi All,
We are facing an issue wherein whenever we try to create a new session in SAP GUI we are getting an error saying
"Maximum no. of sessions reached"
We are using ITS on WAS(webgui) i.e.using the WAS URL we are signing in where we can see the SAP Easy Acess screen.Whenever we are giving /ose38 it throws up a popup saying max.no. of sessions reached.
Can any1 tel me how this can be avoided?
Is there a ITS parameter through which we can change the max limit of sessions per user? If yes,can you tel me how to do it?
Also how many sessions can be opened in parallel using SAP logon pad ?? And how many sessions when are we acessing the backend frm the browser window?
Regards,
Abhishek

Abhishek,
the following parameters (set them with RZ10) should solve your problem:
rdisp/max_alt_modes (maximum number of sessions per user)
login/disable_multi_gui_login ( enable / disable multi-login)
kr, achim

Max no of items reached in FI

Hi,
we have 470 lines in delivery and "Max no of items reached in FI" comes up during post goods issue. The goods have physically left the dock. Is there a way to get around this and do a PGI. I have looked at the OSS note_0001171573_max_num_GI-Items_reached but don't know the impact on FI side. Any input or suggestion is well appreciated.
thanks

Hi
the error exists coz of line item has a three-digit item number in FI and therefore the system
cannot process more than 999 items for each document at the time of post goods issue
Kindly go through the OSS notes 36353 & 123223 it may help you to resolve the issue
Regards
Damu

Max number of items exceeded?

I am trying to develop a questionaire like application. Most of the logic is stored inside pl/sql functions (that is retrieving the previous or next question with possible answers and answer-types, like, eg. radiogroup, select-list, textarea, ...) while all of the questions and respective possible answers are kept inside a collection. In processing the answers after submit I store given answers inside the same collection, basically by nullifying all possibly previously given answers for the current question and then looping through eg, g_f01.count to refill. The entire application remains on the same page, showing eg., in one 'frame', one or two questions with say 7 checkboxes and two textareas.
Everything seems to work fine, I can go forward and backward and will find new questions or ones that already have been answerd, but!!...
after the 50st item (answer), that is after I reached the 50st radiogroup, checkbox or textarea, new checkboxes or radiogroups even though shown the resulting values will not be stored inside the collection anymore.
generating the page i use:
htp.prn(apex_item.radiogroup(p_idx => 1, p_value => c2.a_id, p_selected_value => c2.qa_id, p_attributes => 'id="P2_QUEST_' || i || '"'));
and in processing correspondingly ...
FOR i IN 1 .. apex_application.g_f01.COUNT
LOOP
FOR c2 IN
(SELECT seq_id,
c001 q_id,
c002 a_id,
c012 qa_id
FROM apex_collections
WHERE c001 = to_char(p_q_id)
AND collection_name = 'ANSWERS'
AND c002 = apex_application.g_f01(i))
LOOP
apex_collection.update_member_attribute(p_collection_name =>
'ANSWERS', p_seq => c2.seq_id, p_attr_number => '12',
p_attr_value => c2.a_id);
END LOOP;
END LOOP;
to me I only use f01 ... f04 say, ... Is it possible that I still hit the max of 50 page-items?
Regards
j.

max number of items exceeded?

Message no. F5727:maximum number of items reached in FI sereen MI07

hi sap techies
Message no. F5727:maximum number of items reached in FI in screen MI07
when i try to post inventory difference in MI07(Physical difference posting) i give the difference amount and reason for movement and i try to save it.it gives me the error maximum number of items in FI reached please help
kind regards
sap fico
arman
Edited by: akausar on Oct 10, 2011 3:23 PM

Dear Akausar,
The error F5 727 is an error from the FI component side. This is
because FI cannot accept a posting document with more than 999 line
items.
There is a limit of (999) line items which can be posted per FI
document. This is because the line item number (BSEG-BUZEI) field
length is defined as (3) numeric positions, i.e., (999) line items.
The fact that an MM document contains X positions, doesn't
mean that the FI document will contain the same number. This is the
reason why in some occasions the error message is triggered when posting
an invoice in MM.
Please bear in mind the 'rule of the thumb' for this kind of scenarios
in which you have a large MM-Document: consider an average of 4 line
items created for each line: this is due to discounts, tax postings,etc.
Unfortunately, there are no immediate plans to expand the number of
line items beyond the current limit of (999) lines per document.
SAP's Development group is aware of this functionality change request;
however, the change is massive because BSEG is a cluster table which
is used in numerous R/3 programs. The most commonly used workarounds
are as follows:
1) Implement FI summarization (per note 36353).
2) Cancel the original billing document and split it into smaller
documents using different payment terms but actually with the
same terms.
This will avoid the (999) line item limit for FI postings.
br, Guido

Max number of 'OR' elements in a single query?

Hi there,
I'm running on 9i and was wondering if there is any limit on the max number of elements allowable in an Or query.
i.e: column1 = value1 OR column2 = value2 OR etc.. etc..
If there is a limit, what is it?
Can it be configured?
What is a good value for performance (all columns are in the same table)?
Thanks for any input...
P Lowry

Hello,
Yes there is a limitation of elements on a BSP page.
Please read:
/people/brian.mckellar/blog/2005/04/25/bsp-programming-gen-branchoffset-limit-reached
Regards,
Dezso

Maximum number of clients reached

Hi all,
I have Arch running on my laptop since a year, recently i started to have a very annoying problem, with few just few X client sometimes i can't open any X program, for example mousepad from the terminal will show:
Maximum number of clients reached
(mousepad:21270): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0
while
xlsclients | wc -l
shows 24 clients? the maximum should be 255!
The only one thing that might be related which i did recently was to install compiz and enabling desktop effects, but i removed them completely including the user configuration files that are left, after that i started to see the problem occasionally.
Any hint?

Any updates on this?
After a recent update, when I tried to launch chromium (or google-chrome) via terminal I got a parse error for the file "/usr/share/hwdata/pci.ids"
After I re-installed some related programs
pacman -S usbutils pciutils hwids
I was able to run chromium again, but now I get this max clients error.
Here is the output of xlsclients
$ xlsclients
Maximum number of clients reachedxlsclients: unable to open display ":0.0"
How can I go about debugging this?
EDIT: The bug is with VLC. When VLC is closed, everything works as expected.
Last edited by beardedlinuxgeek (2013-02-19 13:35:29)

HT204053 Max number of devices on one iTunes account?

Max number of Devices on a single iTunes account

Devices or Computers? The former there is no limit. For the latter there is a limit of 5.

Summarization ( max number in fi reached)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for