Sun Studio Express - February 2008 download link points to internal site

The download link at http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/ssx/readme.html, part 4 points to a Sun internal
site (http://dscpreview.sfbay/sunstudio/downloads/express.jsp).
Can this be fixed ?

Not exactly the same topic, but it is not currently possible to download the express edition of Sun Studio due to an error that occurs when submitting an email address. The error given (from http://subscriptions.sun.com/util/sunmail.jsp) is:
Error  :  Requested action failed for the email address [email protected]
SunMailThread : nullAttempting to use the "Send Comments" link is also met with failure. After I fill out all the information, it sends me to a page with just the first and last name fields highlighted, as if to tell me they need to be filled in (yet - they are), but there is no form to submit on this page. Hence, I am stuck.
So, I come here in hopes that both these problems get fixed sometime!

Similar Messages

  • Sun Studio Express February 2008 - Now Available

    Howdy,
    A new build, February 2008, of Sun Studio Express, which offers preview builds of the next version of Sun Studio software for Solaris and Linux platforms, is now available:
    http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/express/index.jsp
    Highlights in this build include:
    * Improved IDE based on NetBeans IDE 6
    * Project D-Light: app profiling that includes Dynamic Tracing (DTrace) instrumentation
    * Updates to the C, C++, & Fortran compilers
    * Improved x86 and SPARC optimizations
    * Latest bug fixes
    For more details, check out the README:
    http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/ssx/readme.html#2
    As always, let us know what you think via our forums:
    http://forum.java.sun.com/category.jspa?categoryID=113
    ...and bug (defect) and Request for Enhancement (RFE) facility:
    http://bugs.sun.com/services/bugreport/index.jsp
    Finally, check out the Sun Studio community site on the Sun Developer Network:
    http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/
    ...and keep up to date by subscribing to our RSS feed:
    http://developers.sun.com/rss/sunstudio.xml
    Thanks!
    /kso

    Hi,
    we are currently using SunStudio 12. I have noticed that early access product, SunStudio Express, Feb2008. It seems that new features coming from NetBeans 6.0 have contributed to SunStudio IDE. I prefer to use SunStudio Express IDE. But i have also noticed that sun CC compiler version is also different. Actually it is no surprise, since SunStudio is a complete product composed of compilers, tools and IDE.Now, i am quite doubtful whether we should use SunStudioExpress. That's why i want to learn when official new release for SunStudio will be announced.
    Though i have searched internet, i couldn't notice any news about the next official release of Sun Studio( Sun Studio 13 ). When will this early release( SunStudio Express, Feb 2008 ) be released as SunStudio13? What is the release roadmap of SunStudio?

  • Compiling MySQL 5.1.26-rc with Sun Studio Express on Linux?

    I managed to compile MySQL 5.1.26-rc with Sun Studio Express on Linux (OpenSuse 10.2 on x64), but I get unexpected crashes every time a connection thread exits:
    (gdb) where
    #0  0x00002b2ce0649535 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
    #1  0x00002b2ce064a990 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
    #2  0x00002b2cdf949795 in __pthread_unwind () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
    #3  0x00002b2cdf944425 in pthread_exit () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
    #4  0x00000000005048b2 in one_thread_per_connection_end (thd=0x16d88f0, put_in_cache=false)
    at /home/mysql/debug/sql//mysqld.cc:1893
    #5  0x0000000000513b75 in handle_one_connection (arg=0x16d88f0) at /home/mysql/mysql-5.1.26-rc/sql//sql_connect.cc:1122
    #6  0x00002b2cdf94309e in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
    #7  0x00002b2ce06da4cd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
    #8  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()If I compile with gcc using e.g. BUILD/compile-amd64-debug-max, I have no issue! But I want to use Sun Studio in order to be consistent with the Solaris version, and also because Sun Studio is likely to produce better code.
    Here is the compilation script, it downloads and extracts the source tree and builds it (it assumes Sun Studio Express is installed in /opt/sun):
    #!/bin/bash
    export PATH=/opt/sun/sunstudioceres/bin:$PATH
    wget -q http://mir2.ovh.net/ftp.mysql.com/Downloads/MySQL-5.1/mysql-5.1.26-rc.tar.gz
    tar xpf mysql-5.1.26-rc.tar.gz
    cd mysql-5.1.26-rc
    # Explicitly specify libs to avoid linking with the STL.
    export LIBS="-xnolib -lCrun -lm -lc -lrt"
    autoreconf --force --install > autoreconf.log 2>&1
    export MY_FLAGS="-g -mt -xtarget=generic -m64"
    CC=cc CXX=CC CFLAGS=$MY_FLAGS CXXFLAGS=$MY_FLAGS ./configure --with-big-tables --without-embedded-server --disable-shared --with-pthread --with-ssl -with-plugins=max > configure.log 2>&1
    gmake -j > build.log 2>&1Any idea about what is going wrong?
    Thanks.

    Possibly the actual CC (or cc) command lines are not correct. The proper way to say not to link libCstd is the command-line option -library=no%Cstd. Then you don't need to add the default system libraries like -lc to the command line.
    Can you show the actual CC command lines that are generated by the makefile? They should be in the compilation log. I'd also like to see the command line(s) used to create dynamic libraries, if any, and the final executable.

  • Sun Studio Express 3/09 Now Available!

    Sun Studio Express 3/09, the official build used for the Sun Studio 12 Update 1 Early Access Program, is now available for download:
    http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/express/index.jsp
    The Sun Studio Early Access build is available on Solaris, OpenSolaris and the latest Linux distributions (Red Hat Enterprise Linux, SuSE,Linux Enterprise, CentOS, Ubuntu). Feature highlights since the Sun Studio 12 release include:
    * C/C++/Fortran compiler optimizations for the latest x86 architectures from Intel and AMD including SSSE3, SSSE4a, SSe4.1, SSE4.2 compiler intrinsics support
    * C/C++/Fortran compiler optimizations for the latest UltraSPARC and SPARC64-based architectures
    * DLight - New tool to utilize and visualize the power of Solaris Dynamic Tracing (DTrace) technology
    * dbxTool - New stand-alone GUI debugger
    * Full OpenMP 3.0 compilers and tools support
    * MPI performance analysis in the Performance Analyzer
    * NetBeans IDE 6.5 including new remote development features
    These new features are all described in the README and wiki pages:
    * March 2009 Express README:
    http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/ssx/express_March2009.html
    * Wiki pages:
    http://wikis.sun.com/display/SunStudio/Sun+Studio+Express+March+2009+Release
    We are exited to hear your feedback on the new features/enhancements in this Early Access build and encourage your participation in the Sun Studio 12 Update 1 Early Access Program so that we can gather valuable feedback to assess the readiness of our release.
    Sun Studio 12 Update 1 Early Access Program:
    http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/overview/earlyaccess/index.jsp
    View the Sun Studio Express 3/09 podcast to learn more: http://mediacast.sun.com/users/ikroopdhillon/media/sunstudioexpress0309/details
    Thanks,
    Ikroop Dhillon

    Hi,
    we are currently using SunStudio 12. I have noticed that early access product, SunStudio Express, Feb2008. It seems that new features coming from NetBeans 6.0 have contributed to SunStudio IDE. I prefer to use SunStudio Express IDE. But i have also noticed that sun CC compiler version is also different. Actually it is no surprise, since SunStudio is a complete product composed of compilers, tools and IDE.Now, i am quite doubtful whether we should use SunStudioExpress. That's why i want to learn when official new release for SunStudio will be announced.
    Though i have searched internet, i couldn't notice any news about the next official release of Sun Studio( Sun Studio 13 ). When will this early release( SunStudio Express, Feb 2008 ) be released as SunStudio13? What is the release roadmap of SunStudio?

  • Difference between Sun Studio 12u1 and Sun Studio Express...

    Hi,
    on my open solaris:
    SunOS opensolaris 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc
    I've installed Sun Studio Express to get the C/C++ compilers. What is the difference with the Sun Studio 12 suite (which is about 200 MB larger than the Express one)? Also I saw there are patches for Sun Studio 12 (last one Jul 20 2009) that might have a fix for a problem I just reported. How can I install such patches?
    Patch: http://sunsolve.sun.co.jp/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-126498-14-1
    Cheers, Fons.

    Studio Express is a pre-release or beta release. Some features may be missing or not functional. It cannot be patched. It can be replaced by a later release.
    Sun Studio 12 update 1 is an actual, supported release, later than the most recent (as of this date) Studio Express. If you install SS12u1 from packages (using the installer GUI for example), you can download and install patches for it as they become available. (Installations from a tar file cannot be patched; they can be replaced.)

  • Error message when starting Sun Studio express IDE

    When I start the Sun Studio express IDE version 3/09 I get the following error message:
    java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Instance_urn = urn:st: already exists in the registration data.
         at org.netbeans.modules.servicetag.RegistrationData.addServiceTag(RegistrationData.java:343)
         at org.netbeans.modules.servicetag.RegistrationDocument.addServiceTags(RegistrationDocument.java:304)
         at org.netbeans.modules.servicetag.RegistrationDocument.load(RegistrationDocument.java:126)
         at org.netbeans.modules.servicetag.RegistrationData.loadFromXML(RegistrationData.java:433)
         at com.sun.tools.swdev.sunstudio.registration.SSServiceTagSupport.getRegistrationData(SSServiceTagSupport.java:257)
         at com.sun.tools.swdev.sunstudio.registration.SSServiceTagSupport.getSSServiceTag(SSServiceTagSupport.java:306)
         at com.sun.tools.swdev.sunstudio.registration.SSServiceTagSupport.createSSServiceTag(SSServiceTagSupport.java:157)
         at com.sun.tools.swdev.sunstudio.registration.SSInstaller.restored(SSInstaller.java:97)
         at org.netbeans.core.startup.NbInstaller.loadCode(NbInstaller.java:419)
         at org.netbeans.core.startup.NbInstaller.load(NbInstaller.java:340)
         at org.netbeans.ModuleManager.enable(ModuleManager.java:906)
         at org.netbeans.core.startup.ModuleList.installNew(ModuleList.java:428)
         at org.netbeans.core.startup.ModuleList.trigger(ModuleList.java:364)
         at org.netbeans.core.startup.ModuleSystem.restore(ModuleSystem.java:276)
         at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.getModuleSystem(Main.java:165)
         at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.start(Main.java:312)
         at org.netbeans.core.startup.TopThreadGroup.run(TopThreadGroup.java:110)
    [catch] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)

    Hello!
    I googled "SSServiceTagSupport.java:257" and found out that it is filed as IZ 154094 against Netbeans:
    http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=154094
    Actually it was reported many times:
    http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=151921
    It suggests a few workarounds.
    Workaround 1:
    "Simple workaround is to disable registration using command line option -J-Dnb.registration.enabled=false"
    Workaround 2:
    "The file ~/.netbeans-registration/6.5/registration.xml is empty, so I have this file erased and restarted the IDE.
    After this step, the file was not regenerated, but the IDe starts now without this problem."
    Please, try one of them.
    Thanks,
    Nik

  • Problems using Sun Studio Express 3 CC on OpenSuse 10.2

    Unable to compile a simple program with CC (compiles w/o errors using g++)
    -- test.cpp -------------------------------------------------------------------
    #include <string>
    #include <iostream>
    using namespace std;
    string xx = "Hello World ...";
    int main () {
    cout << xx << endl;
    return 0;
    sunCC -v -o testcc test.cpp
    ### command line files and options (expanded):
    ### -v -o testcc test.cpp
    ### sunCC: Note: NLSPATH
    = /opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/bin/../lib/locale/%L/LC_MESSAGES/%N.cat:/opt/sun/sunstudiom
    ars/prod/bin/../../lib/locale/%L/LC_MESSAGES/%N.cat
    /opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/bin/ccfe -y-o -ytest.o -y-fbe -y/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/bin/fbe -y-xarch=generic -
    y-xtab -y-verbose -O0 -ptf /tmp/16306%1.
    %2 -ptx /opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/bin/CC -ptk "-v -xs " -D__SUNPRO_CC=0
    x590 -Dunix -Di386 -D__i386 -D__i386__ -D__unix -D__unix__ -D__BUILTIN_VA_ARG_INCR -D__linux -D__linux__ -Dlinux -
    D__gnu__linux__ -D__SUNPRO_CC_COMPAT=5 -xdbggen=no%stabs+dwarf2 -y-s -xdbggen=incl -I-xbuiltin -xldscope=global -i
    nstlib=/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/lib/libCstd.a -I/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd -I/opt/sun/sunstudi
    omars/prod/include/CC -I/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/rw7 -I/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/cc -y-com
    dat test.cpp -s /tmp/ccfe.16306.0.s >&/tmp/ccfe.16306.1.err
    rm /tmp/ccfe.16306.0.s
    /opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/bin/stdlibfilt -stderr </tmp/ccfe.16306.1.err
    "/usr/include/string.h", line 272: Error: End of file encountered in macro
    arguments for "__nonnull".
    "/usr/include/string.h", line 272: Error: ")" expected instead of "(".
    "/usr/include/string.h", line 272: Error: Unexpected ")" -- Check for matching
    parenthesis.
    "/usr/include/string.h", line 272: Error: Operand expected instead of ";".
    "/usr/include/string.h", line 426: Error: "strerror_r(int, char*, unsigned)"
    is expected to return a value.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/new", line 32: Error: operator
    new(unsigned) was declared before with a di
    fferent language.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/new", line 35: Error: operator
    delete(void*) was declared before with a di fferent language.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/new", line 37: Error: operator new[]
    (unsigned) was declared before with a different language.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/new", line 40: Error: operator
    delete[](void*) was declared before with a different language.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/new", line 53: Error: Only one of a
    set of overloaded functions can be ext ern "C".
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/new", line 54: Error: Only one of a
    set of overloaded functions can be ext ern "C".
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/new", line 55: Error: Only one of a
    set of overloaded functions can be ext ern "C".
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/new", line 56: Error: Only one of a
    set of overloaded functions can be ext ern "C".
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 106: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 169: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 185: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 198: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 202: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 206: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 217: Error:
    Only one of a set of overloaded functi ons can be extern "C".
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 225: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 239: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 249: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 264: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    "/opt/sun/sunstudiomars/prod/include/CC/Cstd/rw/iterator", line 275: Error:
    Template declarations cannot have exte rn "C" linkage.
    Compilation aborted, too many Error messages.
    rm /tmp/ccfe.16306.1.err
    rm test.o

    It is a known bug. Check out this topic: http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5109045
    Fix for it should be available in the next installment of Sun Studio Express...
    regards,
    __Fedor.

  • Sun Studio Express Feb 2007, lingering dialog box upon Debug

    When I try to debug a project (say the Freeway sample application) in Sun Studio Express Feb 2007 on Solaris x86, Ultra 20, the following dialog box lingers. I am able to close it manually and debug normally however:
    Loading library
    /usr/lib/liblayout.so.1

    Yes, I've also seen this a number of times. I don't remember what was the problem exactly (dbx <-> IDE miscommunication?), but I believe it's gone now. Please wait for stable release , it should be available soon.

  • Heade files in sun studio 12

    Hello,
    I have Sun Studio Express - February 2007 Early Access Release.
    I intend to use it only in "C" projects.
    I had tried to create a "C" project successfully.
    When I generate a "C" header , named for example list.h, it is created thus:
    #ifndef listH
    #define     listH
    #ifdef     __cplusplus
    extern "C" {
    #endif
    #ifdef     __cplusplus
    #endif
    #endif     /* listH */
    I want to get rid of the "#ifdef     __cplusplus" so next time I will
    create a "C" header file it will not be created. How do I achieve this ?
    Regards,
    Ian

    Hi,
    This is not the time which bothers me.
    This is simply reduant since I am NOT working in c++, and I wish to get rid
    of this lines.
    The question is: how can I get rid of this lines in the template ?
    or is this somehow hard coded ?
    Regards,
    Ian

  • Sun Studio 11 do not parse make output and create link to file?

    Hi,
    Running Sun Studio 11 and can only get file links in the output window when I run a make command that uses CC -g (debug option). We have integrated other tools into our make system (flexlint, cppUnit..) and even though we make sure that the syntax is exactly the same as the compiler output and matches regular expression under tools->options->building->make settings->error expression, it doesn't work. Why do you have to debug compile to get sun studio to create a file link in the output window? Doesn't sun studio just parse the text from the make command?
    example of flexlint output for which no link is created:
    "/vobs/project/oss/fm/fm4/fm-fmalib/fmbal/fmaaulib/src/FMA_List.cc", line 440: Error 84: sizeof object is zero or object is undefined'�
    example of make debug output for which we do get a link:
    "/vobs/project/oss/fm/fm4/fm-fmalib/fmbal/SunOS5.10/inc/FMA_alarm_record.hh", line 1310: Warning (Anachronism):Info "static" is not allowed and is being ignored.
    Regards,
    Ola

    I'd second Maxim's suggestion: try NetBeans 5.5 with C/C++ Development Pack. The official release of NetBeans C/C++ Development Pack 5.5 has happened a few days ago. You can download it from
    http://www.netbeans.info/downloads/all.php?b_id=2284
    Some of the changes between the beta3 build and FCS are:
    * Significant performance improvements in the code parser resulting in faster results in the Class View and Code Completion
    * Programs now run in an external terminal (system dependent) by default. This allows better input control
    * Significant performance improvement in the debugging module
    * Significant functionality improvement in the debugging module
    * New project type "C/C++ Project From Existing Code" which simplifies creating a project from existing code
    * Macro support in code completion
    * Hyperlink navigation for macro usages and #include directives
    * Reformat code
    * Code folding
    * Code completion
    All these features will appear in next Sun Studio release, so you can
    consider NetBeans C/C++ Development Pack 5.5 as a preview of new
    Sun Studio IDE.

  • Problems with sun studio 12 in suse linux 11

    Hi.
    I installed Sun Studio 12 suse linux with no problems. However, the debugging modules (DBX) are not working any more. When I started Sun Studio, it gave a message about modules that could not be loaded in tha moment. I did not pay attention. But I noticed that all debugging options were disabled.
    Using the module manager, I saw the DBX module was not checked, and I could not change it. I was marked with a red X. So I thought to reinstall the application. However, the uninstall utility doesn't work either.
    According with the documentation, running ./uninstaller does it, but I get the following error message instead
    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: uninstall_Sun_Studio_12/class
    Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: uninstall_Sun_Studio_12.class
    at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
    at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:276)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:251)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:319)
    I tried to uninstall manually, and then execute installer, by using first the software manager in linux and deleting the producregistry file manually. It worked because I executed the installer. However, in Sun Studio IDE, debugging options are still not available despite I "reinstalled" the application. I checked the log files and they say the file uninstall_Sun_Studio_12.class could not be written.
    So my questions are:
    1. Is there any other way to repair Sun Studio? What could be the possible for this module to stop working?
    2. Does anyone have an idea of why the installer cannot write the uninstaller class?
    I found that perhaps problems regarding Java / Netbeans versions could be the problem, but the ones I have installed are those packages that were installed along with Sun Studio, and both are valid.
    Thank you very much.

    Perhaps you can simply delete the Sun Studio 12 installation tree, because it will not work on SUSE Linux 11.
    This OS is not supported, so any problems you see with SS12 on SUSE 11 will not be fixed.
    But we have a newer version, that should work better.
    You can try to download and install Sun Studio Express 2008/11 (extract pre-installed image from tar.bz2 file).
    Here is a pointer to the web page:
    http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/express
    All you need is to provide a email address, and press "Download Now" button.
    You will see a page, that gives you 2 options to download Sun Studio Express 2008/11.
    Use "Option 2": Download Tarfile Installer
    Thanks,
    Nik

  • How to change Makefile file name in sun studio for linux 11?

    Greetings,
    For historical reasons, our makefiles are called Make.bld
    Sun Studio refuses to accept these as makefiles.
    It'd be a big pain to modify our entire build system to take makefile as the name.
    Is there a way to instruct sun studio to accept a different filename for makefiles ?
    Thanks,
    Bill

    There is no supported way of getting the Sun Studio IDE (or NetBeans) to recognize
    Make.bld as a Makefile. However, the solution Nik pointed out with a .nbattrs file will
    work.
    Here is a complete file which, if copied to each directory containing a Make.bld file
    will work. However, if the directory already contains a .nbattrs file you should edit
    the existing one and add the <fileobject>...</fileobject> lines rather than overwriting
    the entire file.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE attributes PUBLIC "-//NetBeans//DTD DefaultAttributes 1.0//EN"
    " http://www.netbeans.org/dtds/attributes-1_0.dtd">
    <attributes version="1.0">
    <fileobject name="Make.bld">
    <attr name="MAKEFILE_TYPE" stringvalue="foo"/>
    </fileobject>
    </attributes>
    Note: I split the DOCTYPE line myself. It should be a single line in the file (although
    its probably OK if split, I didn't verify that so I'll suggest a single line).
    I should warn you that the next release of the Sun Studio IDE will no longer use
    .nbattrs files and you'll need a different solution. A preliminary version of the next
    release is currently available by downloading Sun Studio Express 3. The IDE is
    significantly better than the current one! You also get a lot of the same features
    by downloading NetBeans 5.5 with the C/C++ Development Pack.
    Gordon

  • Sun Studio 12 on SPARC: Missing Symlinks

    Missing Library Symlinks
    On SPARC systems, when installing Sun Studio 12 from the "tarball" download, some important symlinks might not get installed. This could cause linker errors or strange runtime behavior from compiled programs.
    Here is how you can tell if the symlinks are missing and how to create them:
    If the command:
    ls <install-directory>/SUNWspro/lib/sparcgets the result
    sparc: No such file or directoryyou need to run the following commands (where +<install-directory>+ is the path to the location of the Sun Studio 12 installation, for example /opt )
        cd <install-directory>/SUNWspro/lib
        ln -s v8plus  sparc
        ln -s v8plusa sparcvis
        ln -s v8plusb sparcvis2
        ln -s ../v9  v8plus/64
        ln -s ../v9a v8plusa/64
        ln -s ../v9b v8plusb/64Note that this only applies to the Sun Studio 12 tarball download on SPARC platforms, and not the Sun Studio Express downloads.

    Missing Library Symlinks
    On SPARC systems, when installing Sun Studio 12 from the "tarball" download, some important symlinks might not get installed. This could cause linker errors or strange runtime behavior from compiled programs.
    Here is how you can tell if the symlinks are missing and how to create them:
    If the command:
    ls <install-directory>/SUNWspro/lib/sparcgets the result
    sparc: No such file or directoryyou need to run the following commands (where +<install-directory>+ is the path to the location of the Sun Studio 12 installation, for example /opt )
        cd <install-directory>/SUNWspro/lib
        ln -s v8plus  sparc
        ln -s v8plusa sparcvis
        ln -s v8plusb sparcvis2
        ln -s ../v9  v8plus/64
        ln -s ../v9a v8plusa/64
        ln -s ../v9b v8plusb/64Note that this only applies to the Sun Studio 12 tarball download on SPARC platforms, and not the Sun Studio Express downloads.

  • All Studio 10 and 11 Download Sites broken

    seems all the download links on the oracle sites are broken and point in circular motion or to a paysite.
    I need the Studio 10 compilers from the software Archives for compiling our software on my sparc machines running solaris 9 and 10, and went happily on with my saved sun links... or so i thought. They sent me to Oracle... so far, so good, but... the Oracle Download Pages supposed to get me to the solaris content send me through the Oracle Maze in circular motion. No way to get to the sun software archive that HAS to be here somewhere, according to oracle...
    Then I tried the Studio 11 download ( not sure if it works for me though ) from the oracle download pages but here i go carouselling again.
    Now I am dizzy.
    If i dig in deep and try to go to the downloads from the sun archives, Oracle is asking me a support identifier, which i obviously only get if i pay, as far as i found out...
    and if i try to get the studio 11 i get fooled in circles.
    help!
    Edited by: user11384438 on 12.10.2011 15:59

    With the acquisition of Sun, by Oracle, the Oracle Solaris Studio (frmly, Sun Studio) site has moved to the Oracle Technical Network (OTN):
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solarisstudio/overview/index.html
    You can download the latest release, Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2, here as well as a few older releases. The Sun Studio 11 download page has a link to a page explaining the download changes for older Sun software. That page has a link to the Sun Archive, which is available in My Oracle Support (MOS) for Oracle support customers:
    https://support.oracle.com/CSP/ui/flash.html#tab=KBHome(page=KBHome&id=()),(page=KBNavigator&id=(from=BOOKMARK&bmDocTitle=Sun%20Archive&bmDocID=1302856.1&bmDocType=ANNOUNCEMENT&bmDocDsrc=KB&viewingMode=1143))
    Sun Studio 11 is available in the Sun Archive. Sun Studio 10 can be made available via a request to Oracle Support.
    /kso

  • Oracle Solaris Studio Express 6/10 - Now Available!

    We are pleased to announce the availability of Oracle Solaris Studio Express 6/10, which can be freely downloaded here:
    *[http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/express/]*
    Sun Studio Express has be renamed Oracle Solaris Studio Express. Supporting both Solaris 10 (SPARC, x86) and Linux distributions (OEL 5, RHEL 5, SuSE 11), Oracle Solaris Studio Express 6/10 will be made available on OpenSolaris in the near future. Downloads included both the package installer (SVR4, RPM) and non-package tarballs.
    Highlights include the following:
    => C/C++/Fortran compiler optimizations for the latest UltraSPARC and SPARC64-based architectures such as UltraSPARC T2 and SPARC64 VII
    => C/C++/Fortran compiler optimizations for the latest x86 architectures including Intel® Xeon® 7500 processor series (Nehalem-EX) and 5600 processor series (Westmere-EP)
    => Enhanced debugging and code coverage tooling
    => Improved application profiling with the Performance Analyzer
    => Updated IDE based on NetBeans 6.8
    Please provide feedback via the Customer Feedback program, where you can file bugs/rfes, make your voice heard via a short survey, and discuss the product in the Studio forums:
    *[http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/customerfeedback/]*
    Thanks!
    /kso

    Hi,
    we are currently using SunStudio 12. I have noticed that early access product, SunStudio Express, Feb2008. It seems that new features coming from NetBeans 6.0 have contributed to SunStudio IDE. I prefer to use SunStudio Express IDE. But i have also noticed that sun CC compiler version is also different. Actually it is no surprise, since SunStudio is a complete product composed of compilers, tools and IDE.Now, i am quite doubtful whether we should use SunStudioExpress. That's why i want to learn when official new release for SunStudio will be announced.
    Though i have searched internet, i couldn't notice any news about the next official release of Sun Studio( Sun Studio 13 ). When will this early release( SunStudio Express, Feb 2008 ) be released as SunStudio13? What is the release roadmap of SunStudio?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Email Spool

    Hello Experts, how to email output of the Spool into the PDF format. Regards!!

  • Extended Help on Gui

    Dear Experts, We are searching for a solution to extend the Help option for the user. For example start the transaction NE21N for creat purchase order and press on one of the F buttons to get more help on the transaction to a file in the server ( PDF

  • What is the equivalent to wwv_corners in portal 10g?

    Hi, I'm migrating some pl/sql applications from portal 8i to 10 g, and I've found that the wwv_corners is gone in 10g. what happened? how come I cannot find anything on the documentation about this inner hidden database objects? Does anyone know wher

  • Slow word 2007

    My word 2007 is responding so slowly to commands i cannot work on it. Also when I save a file, send it ti my other laptop which is running fast, the document which is 74 pages long reopens with only 2 pages, 1 of them blank and the other is my first

  • Anyone else having trouble with LiveDock on ICS?

    So I updated my Xperia arc yesterday to ICS and I must say it's a nice update. The touchscreen is very responsive, transitions smooth, apps run nice, all in all it was worth updating for me, until I met mr. Bug. First bug is the notification LED not