SUN ULTRA 5 - MAIN DRIVE

Hello.
Sorry about my english.
I have a problem with SUN ULTRA 5.
I removed the master drive (Seagate Model ST320420A) and installed new drive (Western Digital WD400EB - 40GB EIDE).
The WD400EB capacity is 40GB but the OS (Solaris 2.6) recognize only 8GB. What could be the trouble?
Any help would be useful to me.
Thanks you

Hello Alejandro,
<i>The WD400EB capacity is 40GB but the OS (Solaris 2.6) recognize only 8GB. What could be the trouble?</i>
that's unfortunately correct. Solaris 2.6 is limited to 8GB for IDE harddisk disks, bigger SCSI disks (requiring an SCSI controller of cause) are supported.
Your 20GB drive had a special SUN firmware (the same model with Seagate firmware would be detected as 8GB).
This is a link to the "discussion"
http://supportforum.sun.com/hardware/index.php?t=msg&got o=6878
Use Solaris 8 10/00 (that's 10/2000) or newer. Solaris 10 is absolutely free, previous versions have been restricted by licenses, that's means you had to buy them or get them under service contract.
See the following link for an explanation.
<b>Solaris 2 FAQ by Caspar Dik</b>
http://www.science.uva.nl/pub/solaris/solaris2.html#q5.64
Michael

Similar Messages

  • Sun Ultra 25 - Bad magic number in disk label

    I have a Sun Ultra 25 SPARC that is booting fine to it's 80GB SATA drive. Solaris 10, OpenBoot 4.22.19.
    Here's what I did:
    I installed a 2TB Western Digital SATA drive into the HDD1 slot.
    I formatted the disk in the HDD1 slot via the format command, labeled the disk, and divided it into partitions.
    I then used newfs to build the ufs on all partitions.
    I mirrored the disk in HDD0 to the disk in HDD1 using ufsdump for all partitions. The data is accessible and looks ok.
    After this was done I did an installboot to /dev/rdsk/c1t1d0s0 (the / partition of the HDD1 slot).
    I then did a fsck on every partition to verify that they are okay.
    I then took the hard drive in HDD1 and put it in the HDD0 slot, now wanting to boot off that disk.
    At the reboot:
    Bad magic number in disk label
    Can't open disk label package
    If I do a probe-scsi:
    MPT Version 1.05, Firmware Version 1.08.03.00
    Target 0
    Unit 0 Disk ATA WDC WD20EADS-00R0A01 3907029168 Bocks, 2000 GB SATA device PhyNum 0
    As far as I can tell disk0 is the correct devalias which is:
    /pci@1e,600000/pci@0/pci@9/pci@0/scsi@1/disk@0,0
    I just don't understand how the fsck is okay, but the boot give bad magic number in disk label?
    The 80GB drive in HDD slot 0 works fine with the boot disk0 command, all I'm doing is swapping a larger disk with the same data for the smaller disk.

    if it is like any other Sun product, it needs to go through the format command and get a volname.... it is just a label, but it needs to be done.
    haroldkarl

  • Yet Another CD-ROM problem Sun ultra 10

    Hello There.
    I just got a Sun ultra 10 and I am trying to install Solaris 10 on it using the original DVD that I got from sun.
    However when i try running a boot cdrom at the ok prompt I see that it cannot read the label.
    Im sure it is because it is a DVD and not a CD. Isn't it?
    Can the sun ultra 10's CD reader read a DVD..i dont think so.
    By the way is there a work around for this.
    Is there a way to boot from the network. I am pretty new to the sparc platform and id love to have a simple How-to about booting from the network.
    I have a 10 Mbps LAN connection at home with Dynamic IP addressing.
    Hope to hear from you,
    Aijaz.

    hmmm..interesting.
    I do not seem to have a spare DVD drive at the moment. Can i not connect an xternal DVD drive to that machine?
    Additionally it says that the openboot version of the box is 3,19 and I wonder if it shud be at 3,3 inorder to have the proper install of the solaris 10.
    Hope to hear from you soon,
    regards
    Aijaz.

  • Sun Ultra 10 with SunStorEDGE A1000/D1000 unable to setup

    I realise this covers old ground but I have not been able to trace a uitable resolvement and would be grateful for assistance.
    I have a Sun Ultra 10 with 256MB RAM and 440GHz cpu.. It has a pci Adaptec 2944UW HVD SCSI interface card. The storage system is a tray of eight scsi 72GB disks housed in a D1000 case. NetBSD reported it as an A1000 SunStorEDGE at sd0 having 16 targets and 8 luns. However NetBSD did not have a readily available controller to setup the raid system so I installed an alternative. I presume the case is a reused old case housing an A1000 unit.
    I tried to format the drives directly but they are not lists as devices such as ct1sd1 etc. and so this is not possible.
    I have installed Sun Solaris 10 but could not communicate and reported inability to use rdriver and rdnexus and after reading a number of reports that driver hooks had been removed from the kernel in Solaris 10 I have installed Solaris 9.
    On both occasions I installed a number of RAID Manager 6.1.1 control packs, namely SUNWosafw, osar, osau, osamn and vtsse direct from my CD here.
    I commanded dr_hotadd.sh to take up the challenge but it failed to communicate.
    I added a number of Rdac amendments to rparams in /etc/osa but this did not resolve the issue.
    I have tried to call probe-scsi-all after doing a reset-all from the OBP but this fails to report anything. I presume this is because the unit is connected by the interface card rather than a direct scsi disk.
    dmesg pipe grep scsi reports:
    unknown scsi sd0 at uata0 target 2 lun 0
    I would be very grateful fr guidance to resolve this connection so that I can create a suitable filestore.
    Thanks
    c

    blackfoot wrote:
    I realise this covers old ground but I have not been able to trace a uitable resolvement and would be grateful for assistance.
    I have a Sun Ultra 10 with 256MB RAM and 440GHz cpu.. It has a pci Adaptec 2944UW HVD SCSI interface card. The storage system is a tray of eight scsi 72GB disks housed in a D1000 case. NetBSD reported it as an A1000 SunStorEDGE at sd0 having 16 targets and 8 luns. However NetBSD did not have a readily available controller to setup the raid system so I installed an alternative. I presume the case is a reused old case housing an A1000 unit.If it's really an A1000, you won't have access to the drives. You'll only see exposed LUNS from the raid controller. Do you have a dial in the rear with a scsi address? That will be the address that the A1000 will respond on. In addition, the A1000 has only one pair of SCSI ports. The D1000 has two pair and doesn't have the scsi adress dial (because each of the disks in the chassis respond on their own addresses). Instead you have some DIP switches to change the addressing behavior.
    I tried to format the drives directly but they are not lists as devices such as ct1sd1 etc. and so this is not possible.
    I have installed Sun Solaris 10 but could not communicate and reported inability to use rdriver and rdnexus and after reading a number of reports that driver hooks had been removed from the kernel in Solaris 10 I have installed Solaris 9.That's fine. You can ignore them. Neither the A1000 nor D1000 require those drivers. You should still be able to use 'rm6' or the CLI tools to interact with an A1000.
    On both occasions I installed a number of RAID Manager 6.1.1 control packs, namely SUNWosafw, osar, osau, osamn and vtsse direct from my CD here.
    I commanded dr_hotadd.sh to take up the challenge but it failed to communicate.
    I added a number of Rdac amendments to rparams in /etc/osa but this did not resolve the issue.
    I have tried to call probe-scsi-all after doing a reset-all from the OBP but this fails to report anything. I presume this is because the unit is connected by the interface card rather than a direct scsi disk.If the controller doesn't support the OBP environment, then yes, you won't see anything then.
    dmesg pipe grep scsi reports:
    unknown scsi sd0 at uata0 target 2 lun 0So that might be a single LUN from an A1000 controller. If the selector switch in the back is set to '2', then it's even more likely.
    Darren

  • Installation of Solaris on an old Sun Ultra 2

    I have acquired an old Sun Ultra 2 and would like to install Solaris on it. One slight problem I have is that there is no floppy or CD drives. The only drive I have attached to the device is a tape drive, and I don't have solaris tape media. Could anyone offer a suggestion as to how I can install Solaris on this machine. Thanks in Advance

    Do you have a disk drive inside Sun Ultra 2?.
    If yes, you can do a network installation from another system (like
    linux or another Solaris box). The Solaris media are available
    from Sun web site.
    Juan Antonio

  • Upgrade for Sun Ultra 60 without DVD?

    20 January 2012
    Greetings,
    I have a Sun Ultra 60 (SUNW, UltraSPARC-II, 64-bit) currently running Solaris 9. The Ultra 60 was listed on the HCL for the Solaris 11 Express release last year, so I assumed it would run Solaris 11. But having downloaded Solaris 11 11/11 and burned it to CD, I get the error message:
    Error: 'SUNW, UltraSPARC-II' is not supported by this release of Solaris. Program terminated.
    Problem #1: The Solaris 11 Express release, which might work, is no longer available. Problem #2: The Solaris 10 8/11 release, which should certainly work, is available only on DVD or as an .iso image to be burned to DVD. (Too large for a CD, I presume.) The machine has neither a DVD reader nor burner, and obtaining one looks like a budget buster, even assuming I could find a driver for it for Solaris 9. So: Is there a way to get a version of Solaris 11 which will run on the Ultra 60, or a version of Solaris 10 on multiple CD's, or some other work-around? It is an odd situation that Oracle has a product which I wish to buy, but cannot find a form in which to sell it to me.
    Thanks in advance for your assistance.
    Sincerely,
    Ian H. Redmount

    23 January 2012
    Dear Mr. Magnus,
    Thank you for your reply. No, Live Upgrade does not address my problem:
    1) I do not have the Live Update software on this machine. Where would I get it?
    2) Live Upgrade still requires a source from which to update the mirror image of the boot environment it produces. The Oracle White Paper on the subject mentions the Solaris 10 DVD. If I could read the DVD, or if I had another source of Solaris 10, I would have no problem to begin with.
    We have to break out of the circular reasoning here. So the question remains: Where or how do I get a non-DVD form of the Solaris 10 operating system?
    Thanks again for your assistance.
    Sincerely,
    Ian H. Redmount

  • How to install Solaris 10 on sun ultra enterprise 450

    I just got a used sun ultra enterprise 450 and need to get a username and password. If I cannot get easily how do I reinstall the OS. What OS can I put on its? I am new to some equipment. It also came with a a storage unit for extra hard drives and how would I use it and set it up also?
    It now says type ctrl-d. What do I do?
    http://www.unix.com/sun-solaris/114206-how-get-root-password-how-install-sun-os.html
    http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/solaris-opensolaris-20/how-to-install-solaris-10-on-sun-ultra-enterprise-450-739614/

    This same question was cross-posted to another forum site
    [http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/solaris-opensolaris-20/how-to-install-solaris-10-on-sun-ultra-enterprise-450-739614/|http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/solaris-opensolaris-20/how-to-install-solaris-10-on-sun-ultra-enterprise-450-739614/]
    with the same unintelligible drivel.
    O.P.
    Go to Docs.Sun.Com and get the system's documentation. Also go get the OBP 3.x Command Reference manual while you are there. All you questions are answered in that documentation, except for those that are easily found with Google.
    [Example of a Google search for your question.|http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=solaris+root+password&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g9&fp=KxYPMM6r3XA]

  • Parallel port programming for a Sun Ultra 5 running Solaris 8

    Hi I'm trying to look for information about reading/writing to the parallel port of a Sun Ultra 5 running Solaris 8. I'd just like to see some basic programs written in C, nothing fancy, just reading and wrting to the port, getting the port address etc. toggling the lines.
    I've tried searching for this information and there is plenty of information about PC parallel port programming with windows or Linux. But there seems to be little for Sun's
    I've tried doing 'man ecpp' but that doesn't really give any clear example. What I need is an idiots guide.
    I've tried searching this Forum and I see that other people have asked the same question before but no one has replied to them. Why is this?
    Thanks if you can help.
    fishman.

    The key is gettting the port into diag mode. Here's a quickly little example that turns all the data pins on and then turns them off:
    #include <sys/types.h>
    #include <sys/conf.h>
    #include <sys/stat.h>
    #include <unistd.h>
    #include <stropts.h>
    #include <fcntl.h>
    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <sys/ecppio.h>
    int fd = 0;
    // ecpp structures
    ecpp_transfer_parms etp;
    ecpp_regs eregs;
    // returns -1 if error otherwise returns fd
    int openoutput()
    fd = open("/dev/ecpp0",O_RDWR);
    if (fd==-1) { return -1; }
    // default is 90
    etp.write_timeout = 10;
    // the big secret
    etp.mode = ECPP_DIAG_MODE;
    ioctl(fd,ECPPIOC_SETPARMS,&etp);
    return fd;
    unsigned char in()
    unsigned char data;
    // from the man pages
    ioctl(fd,ECPPIOC_GETREGS,&eregs);
    data = eregs.dsr;
    return data;
    void out( unsigned char data )
    write(fd,&data,1);
    int main( void )
    int dummy;
    openoutput();
    //all data pins on
    out( 255 );
    scanf("%d", &dummy);
    //all data pins off
    out( 0 );
    scanf("%d", &dummy);
    close( fd );
    return 0;
    }

  • Upgrade for Sun Ultra 60 without DVD--Act II?

    29 January 2012
    As I previously marked the original version of this question as Answered, let me return to it in a new thread. I have a Sun Ultra 60 Workstation running Solaris 9, and I wish to upgrade it to Solaris 10 (8/11 version). It will not take Solaris 11. But Solaris 10 only comes as a 2GB .iso image suitable for DVD, not CD. This machine has no DVD burner or reader.
    User abrante (Magnus) suggested using lofiadd -a to interpret the .iso file as a logical device, mount the logical device on the system, then use Live Upgrade to create a Solaris 10 boot environment from the image. This all works, except for the last step. I can mount the .iso image as an ordinary file system, and browse through it in the usual way. I was able to load the Live Upgrade software via pkgadd. I was even able to run the Installer executable on the image, direct from the command line. This installed the Live Upgrade software again, but would not install anything else. And the kicker--the Live Upgrade software would not recognize the interpreted image as a Boot Environment. For that matter, it would not recognize the original boot environment on the system as a boot environment. For example:
    unknown# lucurr
    ERROR: No boot environments are configured on this system
    ERROR: cannot determine boot environment name for mount point </>
    unknown# lustatus
    ERROR: No boot environments are configured on this system
    ERROR: cannot determine list of all boot environment names
    This is rather odd, as the system does boot to a working Solaris 9 system. Trying to use the .iso image--mounted on /mnt--as a source for lucreate gets
    ERROR: source bot environment </mnt> does not exist.
    ERROR: cannot create new boot environment using options provided.
    OK, so what's the missing trick? How do I get the Live Upgrade software to recognize boot environments, and in particular how do I get it to recognize the .iso image interpreted by lofi?
    Many thanks for your further assistance.
    Sincerely,
    Ian H. Redmount

    Hello, Ian.
    I am a happy owner of the old decent Ultra 10, the junior sibling of your Ultra 60. I faced the same problem with Solaris 11 11/11 Error: 'SUNW, UltraSPARC-IIi' is not supported by this release of Solaris. And I have a couple of solutions for you.
      1.  Buy a DVD drive :). I confirm that at least Solaris 10 update 7 installs from DVD and then runs on Ultra 10 flawlessly (I didnt' try current update 10). The only trick is: discard regular Ultra's 40-wire IDE cable, replace it with modern 80-wire one.
      2.  Download Solaris 11 Express (2010/11). I confirm it installs and runs on Ultra 10 flawlessly. Yes, it is n/a on the Oracle web site, but still easily available in torrent networks. Search for "Solaris 11 Express 2010.11", and you will find many torrents. You need "sol-11-exp-201011-text-sparc.iso" (452M) CD image. I believe that downloading Solaris 11 Express is legal.
    One more thing - sometimes installer forgets to write a boot block on boot disk, and you may need to run installboot manually after installation.
    Regards,
    Konstantin Andreev.

  • Sun Ultra 40 Suppl. CD V1.3 Bios + SLi Broadcast Aperture + Nvidia 91.29

    I am using a Sun Ultra 40 with dual Opteron and dual Quadro FX 4500 in SLi-Configuration.
    I just upgraded the Bios to the new release V1.3 and I just noticed an entry inside the Bios regarding the "SLi Broadcast Aperture". Following values are possible:
    1. Disabled
    2. SLi on Master
    3. SLi on Slave
    What is the recommended value for my system in order to maximize the performance? I assume the master is the first graphics card, but I would like to know the correct value.
    Another issue I found out with the newest supplied Graphics driver on the supplemental CD by Sun (Nvidia V91.29), after startup the driver recognizes the sysem as an SLi-System but by enabling the SLi-support it is stated that the system does not have two identical graphics cards and SLi stays disabled. With the older driver on the supplemental CD V1.2 everything works fine. I have the doubt, that Sun was slightly to fast by releasing this driver?!
    Anyhelp is more than welcome/needed and appreciated! For anybody intrested, the Sun Ultra 40 is an awesome system and for any heavy workload in CAD first choice!

    Both of these problems are now documented on the X2100 server release notes (which wasn't the case when I originally posted the topic).
    http://www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/hardware/docs/html/819-3722-15/
    The problem with sharing the bge0 port between Solaris and the IPMI is a bug in the bge driver, fixed by patch 122028-02.
    The problem with the bmc driver was more mysterious. Finally a note ("Adding SMDC Card Requires BIOS Flash") was added to the release notes web page. I had already upgraded my BIOS to the latest (1.1.1) revision, but re-flashing with the /cd switch as detailed in the note and performing a reconfiguration boot of Solaris fixed the problem.

  • Installing Windows Server 2008 on Sun Ultra 24

    I have a Sun Ultra 24 that I previously had Windows Server 2003 64 bit installed and working fine.
    I am going through the process to install Windows Server 2008 R2 64 bit, and it is failing at the last step of completing the install, saying that windows failed to install components.
    Prior to installing, I loaded the drivers for Intel ICH9 SATA AHCI Controller from my Drivers and Tools 1.4 disk and formatted the drive that was previously used. I am not attempting to install RAID and there are no additional hardware components in my system.

    when restaring the windows after that it give me the below message in the attached image from the KVM consol

  • Help w/ Time Machine and 2 External Drives + Main Drive

    I need some help on the best possible setup with the tools on hand...
    Currently I have the following:
    iMac with 500GB Hardrive
    My Book with 2 TB Hardrive
    My Book with 1.5 TB Hardrive
    What I want to do (in my head anyways) is have my main drive for my normal applications (ilife, iworks and everything else under the sun) and use the 1.5 TB for my iTunes as i have alot of movies and music and then use my 2 TB to back up the main drive and 1.5TB drive that way if my 1.5TB drive dies my iTunes are still in tack and likewise for my main drive with my applications.
    before I go ahead and do this... is it best just to use time machine on my 2TB drive? or should I parition it say 1.5TB for Time machine and 500 GB for Carbon copy so I can boot off of that drive if need be?
    I have done some research on the subject but just want to make sure I'm not missing a step or if there is a better set up I should do with my current gear (500MB main drive, external 1.5 TB and 2TB drives)
    thanks!

    Narayan9 wrote:
    total data that needs to be backed up isnt that much... probably around 600-700 MB currently
    I'm sure you mean 600-700GB
    (but it is growing). I'm in the mitts of ripping my purchased DVD's to itunes so I can watch them VIA Apple TV.
    The whole reason for me buying the 2 external drives was to ensure my itunes files wouldnt be lost in a hardrive failure as I have a very large DVD collect (around 300) and as you know its very time consuming to copy them to itunes in the first place and if my main drives dies Im not sure if I would have the patients to re-copy everything to my iMac.
    you can use the 2TB drive to back up everything you have now via TM. but if it grows much more then I would suggest using a different backup solution as outlined in my first post. TM needs space for incremental backups and some overhead just to operate. most other backup tools don't.

  • Sun Ultra 40

    Has anyone gotten dual-display to work with a Sun Ultra 40 with Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 4.0? The dual-display works when booting and shutting down but doesn't work in normal operation when the machine is booted. I've tried both the nvidia driver that comes on the disc with the machine and the latest driver from Nvidia's website.
    Any help would be my appreciated.
    mike

    The best option is to contact Sun support ( or Red Hat if your contract is with Red Hat ), the systems GA date was Feb. 14 and at this time there is limited InfoDocs and SRDBs.

  • Sun Ultra 40 M2 SAS and SATA compatibility

    Is the Sun Ultra 40 M2 SAS backplane compatible with SATA HDD's? Can I mix SAS and SATA hard disks connected to the same backplane, or can I only use SAS HDD's with the SAS backplane?
    Thanks

    Hello All,
    I just wanted to follow up with an update on my progress.
    I put the 2TB drive back in and I did a green field build from media and everything went fine.
    I went into the bios and flushed the device configurations.  Some of the documentation that I was able to find suggest that you need to perform a low level format but I did not have to do that.
    The data channel speed will not go past 1.5GB but the drive that I have is a 6 GB SATA drive.  I only hoped to get 3 GB like the SAS drive.
    The  system with the SATA drive seems to be slower to boot and sluggish. I will try to take some timings and post as I think I want to try to run this machine with mixed disk.  If the SAS drives are going to give me faster boots, I will populate slots 1 and 2 with SAS and the rest with SATA for data.
    Eunix

  • Sun Ultra 1 model 140E specifications

    Does anyone know the disk drive height limitation of Sun Ultra model 140E? What are the disk drive interfaces supported by it? I'm having a hard time looking for documents indicating Sun Ultra 1 model 140E's specifications and limitations.

    Hello John,
    That's exactly the kind of attitude that I got from the Linux crowd
    this is probably a misunderstanding !
    I read his inquiries, posted answers, then reviewed his profile (Recent Messages) and realized that he asked exactly this kind of questions before. He got very detailed answers from haroldb and me (I re-activated my second screen name due to the announced changes regarding case sensitive screen names).
    These forums are user-to-user, not paid Sun support. One of the prequisites is to investigate before asking.
    I try to provide background information (links to the source of information) instead of just a brief answer. It's worth the effort to tell how and where to locate information ("Teach people how to fish instead of just feed them").
    What do you think, which answer takes more time for me ?
    fast scsi disks with SCA connector, 1" height.
    locating the documentation, provide links to the information and trying to insert a 1.6" high bracket into a real Ultra 1.
    Michael
    P.S.: I see your web site is still active. I repaired your old digital satellite receiver and realized that it won't properly display 16:9 on our 4:3 tv set. Letterbox is missing ...

Maybe you are looking for

  • Free Goods Query.

    Hi friends, If i want to give cost of free good as discount what should i do? my requirement is Free Good Line Item should be displyed along with the Main Line Item (In Output also).But I dont require this item delivery instead i need cash discount.

  • KSB2 report: purchase order items have no commitment lines

    Hi, everybody! We switched on the Availability Control recently. We rebuilt the FM budget using transaction FMVB and we realised there is some information that appears on FM reports and not on CO reports. There is a purchase order that has been invoi

  • JDK 1.4.2 NTLM Support?   Problems with IIS

    Has anyone got the NTLM support in java 1.4.2 to work with MS Internet Information Server (IIS)? I can get the Apache group's httpclient to work, but using the java 1.4.2 authenticator stuff always gives me a status code 500 from the server.

  • How to create a georaster object?

    Hi, I type this codes to create a georaster object. but there is error msg. SDO_GEOR.createBlank( rasterType IN INTEGER, ultCoord IN SDO_NUMBER_ARRAY, dimSizes IN SDO_NUMBER_ARRAY, cellValue IN NUMBER, rasterDataTable IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL, raster

  • Patch 8833297 - 11.1.0.7.1 Patch Set Update question.

    Hi The O.S oul5x64 database version 11.1.0.7.0 after applied this patch Patch 8833297 - 11.1.0.7.1 Patch Set Update and went thru the post installation procedure. SQL> select * from v$version; BANNER Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.