Supplement Auto Posting/Recon. acct ready for input

Hi SapGurus,
I need help, i want to know the details like as why and when to use in which type of GL
1) Supplementary Auto Posting
2) Recon. Acct ready for input.
As the difference between   Recon. account for acct type (like K,D,A etc.)  and Recon. Acct ready for input.
Regards.
Tej

Hi,
1. Supplement for Auto Postings : This can be used when a GL Account determined by automatic Account assignment is to be replaced manually. If you do not have this tick in the GL, you cannot change GL's which are generated by automatic posting.
2. Recon Account Ready for Input : This is used in case of Alternate Reconciliation Accounts. The Recon Account is usually entered in the vendor/Customer master and all postings happen to that GL's only. But in case for a single Vendor, you want to post in different  Recon Accounts at run time, then you need to config the alternate recon accounts and mark this field"Recon Account ready for input' in GL master in FS00.
When you mark a GL for Recon Account type for A, K, D then that GL is marked as Reconciliation Account, but when you tick the Recon Account ready for input tick, then this Recon Account can be changed in run time at the time of posting.
Regards,
SAPFICO

Similar Messages

  • Recon account ready for Input-Not possible to change during MIRO

    Hello
    We are on ECC 6.0
    System does not allow users to change Vendor Recon A/c during invoice verification through MIRO. Recon A/c field is greyed out under Details tab in MIRO.
    Recon Account has been declared as Ready for Input and Alternative Recon A/c has been mapped wrt GL A/c by assigning it an ID.
    However, i am able to change recon A/c during invoice booking through FB60 or F-43 t codes.
    What am i missing?
    Does sytem allow change of Recon A/c in MIRO? If yes, how?
    Thanks.
    Vimal

    Hi, check vendor rec. account for this Company code, then check Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable-Business Transactions-Postings with Alternative Reconciliation Account-Define Alternative Reconciliation Accounts
    If there exists such Defining, so check may be Alternative account just for Aut.posting, or forbided for posting in this Currency

  • Recon acct ready to input field- in G/L Master data

    Hi Gurus
    What is the importance of field- Recon account ready to input in G/L master data?

    Hi,
    If you need more details with example, i will try to expalin you.
    when ever user want to change the reconcilitaion account at the time of creation of document, its not possible to change bcoz one account has only one recon a/c
    But with the help of this check box we can able to change that recon a/c at the time of document for that particular vendor /customer/ asset
    Pls go through this link
    [G/L account must be marked as ready for input;
    Regards,
    Gamidii

  • G/L account must be marked as ready for input

    Hi All,
    In our system (SAP 40B), I set a payer code reconcile account is 1000001. Then I add value "G/L Acc. 1000001, Alt. G/L 1100001" at IMG - Permitted Alternative Reconciliation Accounts.
    I used F-22 Input fi document for this payer code, when I changed the G/L account from 1000001 to 1100001, the system display below message.
    G/L account must be marked as ready for input
    Message no. F5 439
    Diagnosis
    A reconciliation account which is entered when you enter a document needs
    the marking "Reconciliation account is ready for input" in the master
    record. In this case, this requirement is not met.
    Where can I mark "Reconciliation account is ready for input" in the master
    record?
    Best regards,
    Eric Yang

    Dear Srikanth,
    Because one payer code only can set one reconcile account, user want to change reconcile account from account A to B (only for this document). So I set "Permitted Alternative Reconciliation Accounts" let user can change AR reconcile account by T-Code F-22。
    I have already sat the field 'Recon. acct ready for input' as display and solved this question, thanks for your help!
    Best regards,
    Eric

  • Reconciliation account ready for input

    Dear All,
    While creating GL, if it is a recon account, then it is picked up form the Account Type (ie) either vendors/debtors/assets.
    What is the use of 'Reconciliation account ready for input', Will there be any other recon items other than vendors/debtors, etc.
    Please clarify,
    JEERI

    Dear,
    Reconciliation account ready for input at time of posting - Indicator which determines that the reconciliation account is ready for input when posting a document. The indicator is used in Financial Assets Management like when you make initial load of the asset balances the balances are being posted to Asset Sub-Ledger but not to the GL Account.
    Hence, in such cases, you are required to Reset the Reconciliation Accounts in OAMK and post the same entries into GL Account that you have loaded to Asset Sub-Ledger and then again make them as Reconciliation Accounts.
    Note: On the other hand Reconciliation Accounts are only mean for posting by the System, but when you select the "Recon. account ready for input", it would become like a normal account, it will allow you to post directly, this would invalidate the integrity of the data. Therefore, you should never put the check box Reconciliation Account ready for input for RECONCILIATION accounts.

  • BADI Error: Field GOITEM-ACCT is not ready for input ? HELP!

    I get this error message when testing my BADI in the MIGO Transaction.  The BADI is the MB_MIGO_BADI.  It is from the Line_modify method.  Here is the entrie message:
    BAdI: Field GOITEM-ZZREG_ACCT is not ready for input. (Change is not copied over)
    Message no. MIGO050
    Diagnosis
    The contents of field GOITEM-ZZREG_ACCT have been changed in BAdI MB_MIGO_BADI (method LINE_MODIFY). The field, however, is not ready for input, so the change cannot be copied.
    In method LINE_MODIFY, only the contents of fields that are ready for input can be changed.
    The field is defined correctly in the screen as an input/output field - so it does not relate to that.
    HELP!!!!!

    Yes - I have reviewed all of the code and I never do any modify to the screen attributes of a field - although it sure acts like it.  The screen lets me put in data and it stays there up until it finishes the method line_modify.  The error is when i press return after i enter the field- it completes the BADI method and then goes to the main program and does field validation and always comes back with some internal table field called "work" with a value of 0 and it should be a value of 6.
    Thanks! 
    Scott

  • Field property indicator is not ready for input in sap

    HI All,
    i am trying to post transaction in GJT1.
    i am getting below error "field property indicator is not ready for input"
    i tried taking different asset,
    now it is showing below error msg. please assist me on both the issues.
    "system status CRTD is active"

    I got the answer.
    using GJVV i was able to resolve my issue.

  • Hidden variable but ready for Input - BEx

    Hello everyone,
    I wanted to know if it's possible to create a variable for selection screen in the BEx which is hidden but still ready for input.
    I guess that if I uncheck the option "Variable is Ready for Input" in the variable properties in BEx, I will have a variable which is hidden and can be manipulated in a SAP Exit function module. I don't want to manipulate the variable there but send a value through RRI to this report (where the Variable should be hidden). If I uncheck the option "Variable is Ready for Input" I cannot set this in the RRI settings because I don't see the variable since it is not ready for input
    Do you know a possible solution for this?
    Thanks,
    Carlos

    Hello Bob,
    Thanks for your fast answer. I got what you said, but it is not as simple as it is, for that reason I will describe the scenario a little bit more:
    Source query has:
    Variable: Key Date (Single, mandatory) -> InfoObject /APC/ACCTRADAT
    Key date means "all before that date" (defined in the extractor).
    Target query has:
    Variable: Transaction Date (selection Option, optional) -> InfoObject /APC/ACCTRADAT
    Transaction Date means "only that date" or "from one date to other date".
    If I send the date through RRI, the target query will think that the value it is getting is a single value, but it's actually a range (all before that date).
    For that reason I created a new InfoObject called Key Date for Recon. (/APC/RCTKEYDAT) with a single optional variable. I don't want to show the InfoObject as a free char because it makes no sence on it. So, depending on the variable I get, the extractor will decide either if it is a range or a single value. Any ideas?
    Regards,
    Carlos

  • MIGO Field display to ready for Input

    Hi,
    Field EBELN purchase order is made mandatory for movement type 541
    When i am doing MB1B its ready for input
    But when i am trying to post 541 using MIGO the field is display only
    I tried Enjoy settings for MIGO but the field is not available in modifiable or influencing node
    Is there any way i can add the field or other workaround solution?
    Thanks
    Diwakar

    Hi Jurgan,
    Thanks for your reply ,
    The requirement here is to track the link between 541 and 542 ,
    The processor PO is updated by user in PO field and also added the vendor field (custom) which is again updated by user
    while doing 541 on saving exit finds out the latest PO number for combination of Vendor and material and updates it in one field
    Hence 541 document always contain the processor PO ,and vendor PO
    Normally client use MB1B for this but , if required MIGO can not be used because of this PO field constrain
    Hope its clear
    Thanks
    Diwakar

  • User exit to open field for change / ready for input in delivery

    Hi !
    We need to open a field for change / ready for input in the header level of a delivery after it has been goods issued. Is there a BADi / User exit that can open a field for change / ready for input in the delivery after the delivery has been goods issued ?
    Regards,
    Ashok.

    Hi,
    As per the SAP Process it is not recommendable to edit the closed delivery. In order edit the devlivery you have to cancel the post goods issue and then update the same.
    So there is a option like in PBO user-exits, we can force the status fields values and open up the delivery fields. But this would lead to inconsitency.
    If you are updating just any information, you can always use the Text fields in header or items to update at any time of delivery processing.
    Regards,
    Sivparatap

  • Migo: field not ready for input

    hello  ,
    i am stuck with an issue , which is ---
      I have to add two fields in migo tablecontrol with dyndr- 200, for overdelivery tolerance and under delivery tolerance.
    I am able to add them with my custom fields (ZZUEBTO,ZZUNTTO). and now fields are their in table control .
    But now the issue , when i am initializing values to these fields using badi MB_MIGO_BADI ,and method LINE_MODIFY,
    its showing warning that --
    BAdI: Field GOITEM-ZZUEBTO not ready to accept input (Change will not be adopted)
    Message no. MIGO050
    Diagnosis
    The contents of field GOITEM-ZZUEBTO have been changed in BAdI MB_MIGO_BADI (method LINE_MODIFY). The field, however, is not ready for input, so the change cannot be copied.
    In method  LINE_MODIFY, only the contents of fields that are ready for input can be changed.
    if any one , please revert me back .
    Thanx,
    Jeetendra Chauhan
    Edited by: jeet.chauhan on Jun 2, 2011 7:58 AM

    Hi
    If I understand you, you are modifing the standard dynpro SAPLMIGO 0200 (ie: the table control TV_GOITEM). I suggest you to avoid it and mantain these fields in a new tab with this BADI and methods PBO_DETAIL and PAI_DETAIL.
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Navigational Attribute as 'Ready for Input'

    I have a navigational attribute called sub category for profit center. Both has the variable 'ready for input'. I am able to get the report output based on the profit center input but not on the sub category. Do we need follow anything while providing the navigational attribute as 'ready for input'? Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Mahesh Kumar

    Hi,
          I am getting "Time Out error" and "Error while reading data; navigation is possible".  I am able to get the Sub Category data in the multi provider.
    Mahesh
    Edited by: MAHESH KUMAR on Oct 6, 2009 12:40 PM
    Edited by: MAHESH KUMAR on Oct 6, 2009 12:41 PM

  • Where is the "not ready for input" field stored in SAP?

    Hi,
    In the tcode CT04, the 'Additional Data' tab has a field called 'not ready for input'. I want to find this value in a table. I thought it was in CABN-ATINP but this does not seem to be populated all the time.
    e.g.
    1. characteristic ABCDE has the value checked in CT04 but there is no entry in CABN-ATINP
    2. characteristic ZYXWV has the value checked in CT04 and there is an entry in CABN-ATINP
    Does anyone know:
    a) why?
    b) how to find the value for point 1 above?
    Thanks,
    Kroc.

    obviously, that is wrong.
    It is true that the ATINP value for batches which have a reference field in CT04 does not ever change but having a reference field does not necessarily mean that it should be display mode.
    Anyone know why the reference field stops the ATINP field update?
    And how does the program know that it should be 'not ready for input' when the ATINP flag is not changed?
    Thanks.

  • Bex variable ready for input not displayed in webi

    Hi,
    I created bex query with some variables.
    Variables are defined as "optional" but "ready for input". On productive system the prompts are all displayed, but when i transported the webi report to dev, some prompts are not displayed.
    we are on BW 7.31 and BO 4.0. I also tried with BO 4.1. but the problem is the same.
    I have no idea what's wrong here! Attached you can find some screenshots on my current settings.
    thanks,
    Katharina

    Hi,
    yes the reports are based on BICS and I moved them from prod to dev.
    I already checked, the query panel does not show these variables!
    I copied query and saved under new name, and i also created a new webi report upon this query, but some variables ready for input are still not displayed.
    Regards,
    Katharina

  • How to hide a varible that is ready for input and personalized for a value

    Hi All,
    Is there anyway to hide a variable in variable screen selection which is ready for input and its personalized value is stored in the ODS.
    Any help greatly appreciated.
    Suresh.

    Hi Roberto,
    Is there anyway to hide that variable from the variable screen(with still option being selected as ready for input).I ried all the options such as replacemetn type & copy from another variable.Always it appears in the varaible screen.
    I don't want user to change the value of this variable.
    Cheers,
    Suresh.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Validate the Date Time

    Does any java library class support to validate the date of the user input?

  • Will Elements and Lightroom open RAW files fro the Sony DSCRX-100 camera?

    Will elements and l;ightroom  open RAW files from the Sony DSCRX-100 camera ?

  • Color profile confusion

    I'm using Windows 7 home premium, Lightroom 5.2 RC, Photoshop CS6. After working on an image in Lightroom, I went to Photoshop to do some finishing. In the process I wanted to convert the profile from prophoto to sRGB. I expected to see the choice of

  • Archiving Emails in CRM

    Hi Experts, I am trying to archive E-mails recieved in the CRM system. To do so, I am trying to schedule a SARA job to archive WORKITEMS in the system. But when I try to execute the report WORKITEM_WRI in test mode and enter the parameters, I get the

  • Book TOC wrong order?

    Greetings, I've just created an InDesign book with each of its chapters being an InDesign document. Each chapter needs its own TOC and there is a separate chapter for the Main TOC. All works fine but for some reason, an entry in the Main TOC is liste