Supply scenario for single contract model

Hi together,
in normal case, a differnentiation in the supply of a point of delivery is made, using the supply scenario.
There it is defined, if it is only a grid usage, supply or any other kind of business scenario.
Now my question is:
does it make sence, to implement the functionality of the supply scenario, when I have a company in a country, that still has a single-contract-model (grid-usage and supply in one contract) ?
Where the differentation is made in the rate category on installation level and via the billing master data ?
And where only big customers ( > 100.000 kwh) are allowed to swich suppliers as they want to.
I have searched for information in this case, but did not really found any that is telling, that it is worth implementing it or stating, no, better not, because using the supply scenario functionality does only make sence, when implementing a two-contract-model (even in one SAP IS-U client) ?
What do you recommend / suggest / think ?
Thank you for your help and effort.
Kind regards,
Manuel

Manuel:
The supply scenario is used to define the service providers at the POD and contract – it was designed to provide the ability to automatically assign service providers to the POD and contract. It was designed to enable customers to implement using the single contract model; it can be used for a multiple contract model as well.
Supply scenario uses MDT to assign service providers and update master data (e.g. rate category). It is possible to copy the standard MDT and provide rules on how the master data is updated when there is a supply scenario change.
regards,
bill.

Similar Messages

Is it pssbl Psting 2 rates to 2 Co codes w/out going for 2 contract model

Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement, my client want to post two rates in a billing schema under two differnt co codes without going for two contract model, I see a problem in Account determination, I dont see any other solution within Billing Module, any suggestions this Please.
Thanks
Yash.

Yash:
Using billing master data, it is only possible to post to a single company code.
regards,
bill.

Scenario for single WLAN to multiple VLANs

Hi there,
I read from this forum some discussion about the WLC VLAN Select feature.
http://www.cisco.com/image/gif/paws/113465/vlan-select-dg-00.pdf
I see that you can use this feature to have multiple VLANS (interfaces) to map to the same WLAN (SSID).
What I try to learn is under what scenarios would people need to have mutliple vlan mapped to single SSID?
In my environment, I have 50+ AP int he campus on 20+ Cisco 4500 switches. I have single WLAN and it is mapped to one subnet. All wireless users would be on that subnets, whereas wired users are on 20+ subnets of their own.
Can someone help me to see under what scenarior (or requirement) that I would want to have multiple vlans mapped to single SSID?
Thanks.

having a large number of users in single subnet is not the best in all designs, since you will have a large single broadcast domain which is a true disaster with dense networks. If you the company policy states that we need only one single ssid
for the whole employees within the company, it doesn't make sense to have them all on the same subnet.
A lot of options are available to overcome such issues :
for example, we might have AP groups feature , dynamic vlan assignment given that we have radius server in place, and vlan pooling.
It might not be feasible to have RADIUS server all the time, and AP groups might be kind of administrtive overhead as well as it might induce a lot of issues when aps fail over from controller to controller --> Vlan select is a good soultion considering the previously mentioned reasons.
Please Make sure to rate correct answers

Configuration Scenario for BPM Using Integration Scenario

hi All,
I Have an Scenario where i am using BPM. Most of the blog tells about manually creating all Configuration objects. I had created an Integration Scenario for this scenario by referring to the earlier threads available for same.
Hoe to Create Integration Scenario for BPM Scenario
Integration Scenario in BPM and few more.
My IS looks like
Sender App Component - Integration Process - Receiver App Component
Now when i am trying to create Configuration scenario for same using model configurator, i am getting Model as "Not Configurable"
And when i click "Configurability Check" Button, i am getting below as status:
Component view IS_POC_BPM: Connection from receivePayload to getABSPayload does not have an inbound service interface
Component view IS_POC_BPM : Connection from sendABSPayload to getPayload has no outbound interface
getABSPayload and sendABSPayload are actions for Abstract interfaces.
IS_POC_BPM is the Integration Process Name.
Also in Integration Scenario, when i create connection between sender action to BPM action there is no inbound interface coming. And viceversa.
Please help me in identifying if i am doing any thing wrong in creating this scenario.
Is it possible to create Configuration Scenario for BPM Using Integration Scenario?
Thanks,
Mayank
Edited by: Mayank Gupta on Apr 21, 2010 6:35 AM

I think you shoudl refer the available Integration Scenarios created for BPMs in IR --> SAP BASIS --> http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/Patterns
Sender template will have the Action with Outbound Service Interface and then in the BPM Template the action will have Inbound Interface.....then within the BPM itself this inbound will be mapped to Action with Abstract Interface
may be after looking the Integration scenarios you will get more idea
Regards,
Abhishek.

Scenario for a single forest model

Kind greetings.
Could anybody please help me to know the best suited scenarios for a single forest model?
I would be much appreciated. Thank you.

Hi Tino,
Thanks for your reply.
The deployment below is a simple environment with a single domain in a single forest, you can take it as an example:
Server1: Domain Controller and DNS server (only one NIC with a static IP address and DNS server points to itself)
Server2: Domain member (in the same subnet with Server1, DNS server points to Server1)
Install AD DS in server manager on server1, choose Create a new forest on Choose a Deployment Configuration page. On the Domain Controller Options page, select DNS server option and create the first domain controller with DNS role in a new forest.
Then promote server1 to a Domain Controller. After that, add Server2 to the domain.
More information:
Installing a New Forest by Using the Graphical User Interface (GUI)
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc755059(v=ws.10).aspx
How to Join Your Computer to a Domain
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb456990.aspx
Best regards,
Susie

XI SRM Integration Scenarios for ShoppingCart model

We've loaded the XI content for SRM (XI7_0_SRM_SERVER_7.xxxx) from the sap marketplace and reviewed the data types, messages, and interfaces. It appears there are no pre-built integration scenarios associated with a Shopping Cart model (Purchase Orders, Advance shipment notice, etc). Does a set of pre-built integration scenarios exist, or are these generally built manually? We are going to be pushing purchase orders from ECC to SUS in most of our scenarios. Thanks in advance.

Hi Brian,
You will have to use the standard XI scenario - " Plan driven procurement with supplier enablement" for document exchange between ECC & SUS.
This will help u push ur PO's from ECC to SUS.
Thanks
Nikhil

SAP IDES Scenarios for IS-OIL & Supply Chain Managment

Hello,
Will anyone share the link / where can i get SAP IDES business Scenarios for SAP IS-OIL & Supply Chain Management (SCM)
PV

Hello All,
I am looking for link SAP IDES Solutions for Model Company for SAP IS-OIL & SCM modules,
Similar to: please go through the below link
SAP Library - IDES - The SAP Model Company
with all scenarios with transactions clearly
https://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/a9/fc4f35dfe82578e10000009b38f839/content.htm
PV

PI setting for transferring Contract from SRM to ECC - Classic scenario

Dear Experts
SRM 702
ECC 6.0 EHP6
SRM - Classic scenario
Need to understand PI setting for transferring Contract from SRM to ECC, as currently document Central Contract document getting created in SRM, but it is not getting transfer to ECC
No XML message getting triggered in ECC systm as well
can you help me in this
if any additional information needed, pls revert
Regards
Prashant K

Fully approve and release the contract. It will trigger the XML Message.
Go to https://websmp203.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=00200682500000002672&_EVENT=DISPLAY&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000122&_HIER_… and download the configuration guide & check the PI setting and required Software Components in PI.

HCM Processes and Forms : Using single Form Scenario for Multiple Countries

Hi ,
I have a requirement to design a HCM P&F form ( Single Process, Single Form Scenario ) to support multiple countries. Form fields should be visible/invisible based on the country ( derived from the login Manager). please help me with the following questions.
1. Is it right way to enable/disable the fields in the same form scenario for multiple countries ( Approx. 20-25 countries)
2. Is there any limitation to no. of fields on the form? does the form performs well with multiple dynamic conditions?
3. If yes, what is the best way to do this? through Java Script / Back end Generic Service?
Thanks in Advance,
VR.

Hi VR,
1. Is it right way to enable/disable the fields in the same form scenario for multiple countries ( Approx. 20-25 countries)
-You can use same form scenario or process for multiple countries if you are using fields based on international structure HCMT_BSP_PA_XX_R*. If you intend to use country specific fields then you may like to use different form scenario for different countries.
2. Is there any limitation to no. of fields on the form? does the form performs well with multiple dynamic conditions?
- As such there is no limiation for the fields.Yes, form performs well with multiple rule configurations.
3. If yes, what is the best way to do this? through Java Script / Back end Generic Service?
I interpret you would like to derive & show fields based on same backend logic, in that case you should generic service.
If you want to show fields based on manager's logon then you should also use authorization BAdi.
Regards
Pooja

Is it possible to create different invoices for a single contract?

Hi All,
is it possible to create different invoices for a single contract?
My customer is asking an invoice per service line.
Thank you for getting back to me on this.
Kind regards
KK

Can somebody please advice?

Integration of SAP IS-U Two Contract Model with CRM 7.0 Contract Mgmt

Hi,
We have 2-Contract model for all customers in SAP IS-U for distribution and supply services. We are also planning to implement CRM 7.0 Contract management and integrate with SAP IS-U. There is a talk in the air that CRM 7.0 Contract Management does not work with 2-Contract model in IS-U because of some POD replication issues in CRM and heard that some clients are currently facing this issue.
Our client is operating in Deregulated environment and we were planning to use Two contract model to separate the services.
Has anyone faced this issue in your projects or Is SAP working on this issue?
Please let me know if there are any workarounds where we can still use 2-contract model and integrate with CRM 7.0? Any help or inputs that can you can provide will be very helpful to us.
Thanks in advance.
Sachin

DearSachin,
As per Design it's only possible to have one contract at the same time per PoD.
If you in a deregulation market it's recommended you to use the IDE integration in CRM.
Unfortunatly your desired business scenario can be achieved on project base only. There are several ideas how to provide the data and the information. One would be to download only the most used contract category into the CRM system (eiher grid usage or supply) and have the other contract only in IS-U (no replication). With a customer enhancement it would be possible do retrieve the whole supply sceanario within the IC webclient.
Another idea would be to attach a new customer based field to the contract which indicates if the contract is a grid usage or supply contract and have the check for double contracts respect that data - this solution is quite tricky and should be considered only by very experienced consultants.
Or use 1 installation with 1 contract for simple supply scenario. The schema contains a rate for both, distribution and default supply. The default supply can be switched with an installation fact. In CRM, there is 1 contract with 1 product. If a customer switches to a 3rd party supplier, an inbound message from the supplier creates a second installation with a supply contract and switches off the default supply rate. This installation/contract is not visible in CRM, it is not replicated to CRM.
As you can see, there are some ideas how to solve your needs on project base, but unfortunatly SAP generally will not change the main architecture which allows several contracts per PoD.
I hope this information is helpful for you.
Regards
Olivia

How to use pre-defined scenarios for RosettaNet with XI 3.0

Hi all.
   I am working in Comgroup Shanghai co. ltd. which is partner of SAP China.
   We have a potential customer who use RosettaNet as their Supply Chain EDI system.
   I would like to make a demo for demostrate the pre-defined scenarios for RosettaNet RNIF 2.0 packages.
   Where can I find such guideline ? I have checked the article: implementing RosettaNet with XI 3.0, but it cannot help me.
   Another question is how I can develop my own scenarios for the RNIF standards which are not included in XI RosettaNet business package ?

Hi Andy,
See the instructions below after you installed the RosettaNet STK.
Below given is the sample config for PIP3B2 Scenario. Part I is using STK and Part II is using 2 XI systems.
<b>Part I. Test Using STK</b>
In your XI ID:
1) Define both the parties 1) Shipper(Your Partner) 2) Receiver(Your company) with identifiers like DUNS Number.
2) In ID goto>Tools>Transfer Integration Scenarios from IR-->select the scenario "PIP3B2_Receiver" from the drop down list.
3) Follow the 4 steps in the config wizard.
4) While creating your CC, create it from the channel template delivered with the RosettaNet BP.
   4.1) Specify the URL for STK which should be in the following format
http://<STK Server>:<port>/rosettanet/servlet/listenerServlet?userId=<Party Name>
   4.2)In the location fields, enter your location and your partner location.
In your STK
1) Start the RosettaNet STK.
2) enter the UserID<Partner Name in XI>
3) Select the Test Scenario, 3B2V01.01-AdvanceShipmentNotification-0001-Scenario-Shipper
4) Enter Global Business ID(DUNS Number) and Location ID for both the partners. These fields should be same as in your R/3 Party configuration.
5) Enter the URL as follows:
http://<XI Server:<J2EE_Port>/MessagingSystem/receive/RNIFAdapter/RNIF
If everything is configured correctly as mentioned, you should be able to test your single-action scenario.
<b>Part II Test using another XI System</b>
For these follow the steps above for XI Config.
Configure one XI System as PIP3B2 Shipper using the Scenario "PIP3B2_Shipper" and config wizard as mentioned above.
Configure the other XI as PIP3B2 Receiver using the scenario "PIP3B2_Receiver" and config wizard.
In the Url field, specify the URL as follows:
http://<XI host>:<J2EE_Port>/MessagingSystem/receive/RNIFAdapter/RNIF
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sam Raju

BOM IN CRM Only for Service Contract

Hello
We want have a BOM explosion working in CRM for service contracts
Here are the details :
We have replicated the materials from ECC to CRM. We are not maintaining any BOMu2019s in ECC.
The idea is that we maintain the BOM Structure in CRM only, as we donu2019t want to have the Items as a billable item in a position, only for information purposes (or later on for metering)
We have maintained the product category for the header product in CRM so we are able to maintain depended components
(Relationship type SCDEC S Dependent Components (DC) )
Not we are able to assign dependent component to the header material
Item category groups:
We understand that the standard item category groups that should be used are ERLA for the header product and LUMF for the Item product.
In order to support the same functionality for the given item category group , maintained at the product level in ECC we copied the same setting for the item category group from the standard to
our settings.
Standart
Tx type     Item Cat Group          item category     structure scope
TA             ERLA                TAQ           A single level Explosion of Structured Product
TA         LUMF                TAP                   A single level Explosion of Structured Product
So we have copied TAQ to ZTAQ and TAP to ZTAP.
ZS01 is a copy of SC (service contract)
Tx type     Item Cat Group          item category     structure scope
ZS01     ZLEI                       ZTAQ          A single level Explosion of Structured Product
ZS01     LEIS                       ZTAP          A single level Explosion of Structured Product
But when we use a header product in the service contract, we cannot see the BOM is exploding.
We have also created some products in CRM with exactly the same Item Category groups as the standard and when we create a standard order (TA) in CRM, the BOM is NOT exploding.
Questions:
Is it possible to have the BOM setup only in CRM, like we try to do it?
Is it possible to use our own item category groups in CRM more is the functionality only working with ERLA and LUMF?
Is it possible to use the BOM Explosion in Service contracts as well ?
What steps are we missing to get the BOM explosion in CRM ?
Thank you for your help
Frank
Edited by: Frank Foerstner Foerstner on Dec 9, 2011 12:34 PM

Thanks Nablan, I could do that for multiple header coming in file. But I have a question for you on BAdI ALM_ME_006_GOODSMVT. I have implemented this BAdI , and this BAdI is called by a function Module ALM_MEREP_006_CREATE. When I test this FM giving the Material , Orderid and Movement type entries, this BAdI is triggered when giving a breakpoint. I've given this code for changing the movement type to 961. Cause the stanadrd scenario does not maintain Movement type 961 in Mobile Asset Management. The Movement type 961 for unplanned Materials comes to SAP and changes to 261 as maiantained by TCOKO table. To bypass this & retain the movement type 961 in SAP I'm using this BAdI. Currently this is what I'm doing and am stuck in the method interface how do I call the method.
method IF_EX_ALM_ME_006_GOODSMVT~CREATE .
break-point.
*DATA : i_ce_goodsmovement TYPE REFERENCE
          ALM_ME_CUSTOMER_ENHANCEMENT.
DATA : lr_badi_goods_movement TYPE REF TO if_ex_alm_me_006_goodsmvt.
DATA : ls_user_data TYPE ALM_ME_USER_DATA-USERID.
*DATA : goods_movement TYPE ALM_ME_MATERIAL_MOVEMENT.
CALL METHOD lr_badi_goods_movement->create
EXPORTING
       ce_goodsmovement = ce_goodsmovement
IMPORTING
       user_data        = ls_user_data
       custom_user_data = ls_ce_user_data
       goods_movement   = goods_movement
changing
       return           = return[].
CALL FUNCTION 'ALM_ME_COMMIT_OR_ROLLBACK'
       TABLES
            return = return.
endmethod.
Please help me to get the data in this method. How do I call this.

Fetching Supply Scenario based on Installation number ?

Hi All,
I have got an installation number. Can anyone give me the table names from which i can get the installation's supply scenario ?
Thanks,
Hrushikesh

Hi Hrushikesh,
You are talking about the Supply Scenario field in the ES32 transaction. There are following scenarios
001 -Grid Usage for Points of Delivery Supplied By Third Party
002 -Supply for Point of Delivery in External Grid (Tranmission)
003 -Supply for Point of Delivery in Own Grid (Fully Supply)
Usually we choose to keep this field as blank as it keeps on changing with each contract.
It usually tells whether the installation is currently associated with the Retailer or Distributor. You can find that through Service Provider and Invoice Service provider at contract, that in which scenario installation is. But you can choose to keep this field blank also.
Regards,
Manish Bisht

Periodic Billing for Rental Contracts

Hi Gurus,
Periodic Billing for Rental Contracts
I have a customer requirement where in i need to create a Rental Contract of type say MV.
Billing should be periodic in nature. Say today is the GI date 22/SEP/2008, they give 7 days of lead time up to 29/SEP/2008. From this date onwards the customer is to be billed. They do the invoicing on a quartely basis. From 29/SEP/2008 up to 28/DEC/2008, they need to create one single invoice. This single invoice will be generated sometime in January 2009. How will i configure the system to generate date specific invoices...?
In Periodic billing system will generate billing only on month ends say 30/SEP/2008, 31/OCT/2008 and so on...
This is a high priority issue...Please reply with a solution as soon as possible;
Thanks in advance;
Regards,
Syed Nasir

Hi Syed,
This is not an easy option to do:
In our case, we have opted out of this scenario, but we have evaluated these two options:
1) You can do the monthly billing as present in the SAP, and then you can make one lumpsum invoice for the three invoices generated in a quarter. But the problem is that the revenue shows to be pending and can hurt the business targets.
2) If you have to create this process for only few customers. You can use any two special fields for the contract one field for date and a field for quaterly tagging. Then you have to just create a daily batch job which invoices the contract on the basis of contract type, date and tag. But if you have large number of contracts to process then this would not be recommendable solution.
Hope this helps,
Abhishek

Supply scenario for single contract model

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for