Support code table in searching function

Dear everyone,
In our portal, there are documents in Unicode code table (UTF-8) and other 8-bit code tables. So could you please help show me the way to customize so that with the same search conditions, the result includes all the documents in different code tables.
Thanks and regards
Nhan

I like to note that the "code table" mentioned above means also character set.
Thanks and waiting your replies
Nhan

Similar Messages

Input Text with LOV in table, the search list will be limited with 25 row?

Hi, experts
I got a strange problem with JDev 11.1.1.5.0, I created Input Text with LOV in Data View for one attribute with default setting, the LOV worked fine when I drop the DC with 'ADF form'; but when I drop it with ADF Table, the search function will just show 25 rows, I can see it try to fetch data when scroll down just like form, but then nothing happened, only the first 25 rows will be show without any error log.
Any special configuration needed for LOV in table? or a bug in LOV?
many thanks.

You can change the range size on the VO which you use for the LOV. If you only want to change it for the VO the lov uses, select the VO in question in the application module data model and clic edit. There you enter -1 fro raneg size.
If you want to change it globaly for this VO you open the VO and select the Tuning section and check 'all at once' which should get you all rows. Be careful that the VO don't return too much rows. A LOV wiht more then 50 rows is too big. In this case you may choose an other component.
Timo

Implementing Search functionality on Database Table

Hi Experts,
I am working with webcenter sites 11gR1.
I would like to implement search functionality in our Site on a Specific DataBase table.
could you please let us know the best solution.
Thanks in Advance
Rajendar Pilli.

Hi Jay,
Thanks for your response and help.
1)Both the ways are fine with me. Could you please suggest me know the best way.
2)And, if i want search on a table which is not an "AssetType" table , is it possible?
(Means,i want implement one search in my site that can search the data only in non Assettype table).
Could you please provide your valuable help ASAP.
Thanks in Advance,
Rajendar Pilli.

Why Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes

As we all know , Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes.
But i'm very confused .
Why Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes ?? what's its essential?

Creating a function based index creates a hidden virtual column (you'll see it if you query user_tab_cols) and once you index a virtual column you can no longer shrink the table:orcl> create table t1(c1 number,c2 as (c1 * 2)) segment creation immediate;
Table created.
orcl> alter table t1 enable row movement;
Table altered.
orcl>
orcl> alter table t1 shrink space;
Table altered.
orcl> create index i2 on t1(c2);
Index created.
orcl> alter table t1 shrink space;
alter table t1 shrink space
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-10631: SHRINK clause should not be specified for this object
orcl>so the issue is not with function based indexes per se, it is a level beneath that. Perhaps because the virtual column has no physical existance, when the row is moved there is no reason for Oracle to realize that an index needs updating? I haven't attempted to reverse engineer this, I would be interested to know if anyone else has.

Error in the search function in support forums

It is no longer posible to search the forums for specific key words. I usually use the search function a lot. Nov tt looks like the it only search people and not the forums.
Kirstine

I was given a hint to solve the problem.
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/837642?tstart=0
Looks like a change in the default settings.
Kirstine

RoboHelp 8 vs. 9 - Search Functionality Comparison and "All of the Words" vs. "Any of the Words"

Greetings!
Our organization focuses a lot on the accuracy of our searches, which is a necessity when we have hundreds of very lengthy topics (no matter how well organized they are).
I finally completed a detailed comparison of the search functionality of 8 and 9 and came to the realization that 8 is a disaster, while with 9 things get better, but there's still TONS of room for improvement. I have reported this to Adobe and so far there has been no official response. There are many blogs on here related to the search functionality, but I thought it may be a good idea to try to sum some of them up. I do hope that someone somewhere at Adobe runs into this and shares with all of us why Adobe's Search functionality is still in the 20th century!
I hope this helps everyone else who is curious to know about how the tool's search functions work and whether it's worth upgrading from 8 to 9 at this point. I have included some examples which are in a way internal to us, but they will give you a good idea of what to expect and I'm quite confident you'll be able to recreate them on your side in seconds.
I also wanted to ask a question or two, and if anyone can assist, that would be greatly appreciated:
Currently if we search for several words at once (not exact phrase), both 8 and 9 perform an "Any of the words" search which always returns too many results. Does anyone know a way to change the default to an "All of the words" search? For years I have not encountered a tool out there that doesn't have the option to modify this, alas with RoboHelp 8 and 9, we can't find a way to do it (with or without modifying the source code).
Out of curiosity, are there any other tools out there which offer Conditional Tag (or similar) functionality and which behave better than RoboHelp? (easier to maintain, less buggy, web interface, etc)?
RoboHelp 8 vs 9 - Search Functionality Comparison Table with some Examples:
Search Example
RoboHelp 8
RoboHelp 9
Expected Results
(based on industry standards)
1. Searching for Exact Phrase "Correspondent Banking"
Such a search returns topics which contain "Correspondent Banking" and "Correspondent Bank". The last one is included because "Bank" is the root of "Banking". The topics that contain the exact phrase appear at the bottom. When we click on any of them, we're not automatically taken to phrase so we have to scroll and look for it or use CTR+F.
Identical behavior except that when we click on the topics which contain the exact phrase, we're taken straight to it.
When we hear "exact" we expect "exact" and nothing else. Unfortunately, both versions keep searching for the roots of each word as well and incorrectly display those results at the top. Adobe has made it clear that this is a part of their functionality, BUT this is something we would not expect to see for exact phrase searches that are in quotes.
2. A Non-Exact phrase search of "Geographical Limits of market area"
The tool automatically performs an "Any of the Words" search instead of an "All of the Words" search. This is also related to the question I asked above this table. As you can imagine, this is returning almost every topic and it becomes virtually impossible to find what we're looking for. It even returns topics which contain "of" and nothing else.
Identical behavior
There to be an option which allows us to choose what the default search would be - "Any of the words" vs. "All of the Words"
3. Exact Phrase search of "low-score" with a dash
None of the topics that were returned contain the phrase. As some of you know, RH8 has problems with special characters, including dashes.
RH9 returned only the topic that which contains the phrase and we were taken straight to it when we open it.
The expectation is to see exactly what RH9 currently offers. Unfortunately 8 has a big problem with these types of searches.
4. Exact Phrase search of "2.4"
This is similar to the one above. Adobe doesn't like periods as well. It doesn't not find any of the topics which contain this phrase. In our case, this is a section number and sometimes people want a quick way to get to a specific section or sub-section.
We were hoping that this will be fixed with 9, just the way they fixed the dashes. Unfortunately, still ZERO results returned.
Expectation is for the topics which contain that exact phrase to be returned, no matter whether there's any special character inbetween.
5. Exact Phrase search of "300,000" or $300,000"
The tool only returned several random topics which contain "000" as part of larger numbers. The topic that contains "300,000" was not on that list, even though it also contains "000".
Identical behavior
Expectation is for topics that contain the exact amount to be returned, no matter if there is a coma or a dollar sign anywhere within the phrase.
6. Exact Phrase Search of "525-B5". Goal was to have a special character, a letter and numbers.
ZERO Results returned.
Only the docs that contain the phrase were returned and nothing else. It seems that this this was addressed in version 9 and now it behaves as expected.
Expectation is only for the docs that contain the exact phrase to be returned.
7. Exact phase search of "log" in order to test the Substring Functionality
Here's an extract from Adobe's Support Site:
“Substring search (WebHelp/Pro, FlashHelp/Pro) - If you enable this feature, a search for "log" returns topics containing the words "catalog" and "logarithm." Substring search takes longer than whole-string search.”
So with that in mind, we decided to test if turning the substring searches on and off does exactly as advertised, unfortunately the answer was NO. We even used an example almost idnetical to what Adobe provided on their site.
With Substring Searches disabled, we searched for the word "log". Unfortunately it returned words like "logbook" and methodology". How is that possible?
Identical behavior
Our expectation would be only for docs that contain"log" to be returned, no matter whether substring is enabled or disabled. In our case it was disabled.

Hi there
Out of curiosity, why is it that you expect to hear from Adobe? I'm hoping it's not simply because you posted here. Certainly we have Adobe folks that visit here and we are thankful for that, but it isn't to be expected.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7, 8 or 9 within the day!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

Search function not working correctly

I have a problem searching in a specific document. For some reason, the search function only seems to sift through certain fonts, or types of text. The main text is not included in the search, but rather only (for example) the Table of Contents and some "examples" (in a special font) in the text. Everything else is omitted.
When I copy/paste the main text, it's pasted as a strange code in this fashion, despite the fact that it's quite readable in it's original form:
äíÉí=áåíÉ=Ü~ê=Ñí
This is probably the reason why Search can't find terms in the main text, as searchable text looks quite right when copy/pasted. But how can I solve the problem?
Thanks!
David

Did you check under the file Properties to see if the fonts are embedded? If they are not, you can reembed the fonts if you have Acrobat Pro using the Preflight tools.

How to add Value Table or Search Help for a field which is on Standard SAP?

Hi All,
I have a field HERST (tcode IE01) which doesnt have any value table or search Help. I have the same field in a Z table which I should display for the standard screen field in tcode IE01. So Pls suggest me on this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Jaker.

Hi, Tamas,
I found the reason. The function Z_WEBRFC_READ_DATA_SH had a string concatenation error.
CONCATENATE '{"results":[{"key": "shlpname", "value": "' l_shlp '"},"key": "fieldname", "value": "' l_field '"}]}' INTO htmldoc-line.
The correct code is like:
CONCATENATE '{"results":[{"key": "shlpname", "value": "' l_shlp '"},{"key": "fieldname", "value": "' l_field '"}]}' INTO htmldoc-line.
Another question is, I can't get any words in Chinese from WebRFC. It returns error when I try it. How can I configure it?
Xin

Writing a search function

Hello Folks,
I have written the below mentioned search() function which takes a 'one word' as an input parameter and searches a couple of CLOB datatype columns in my product table and returns the name and id of the corresponding product.
--- SEARCH FUNCTION ----
--- THE USER ENTERED KEYWORD IS SEARCHED IN THE PRODUCT DESCRIPTION COLUMN AND PRODUCT TAGS COLUMN
function search (search_string varchar) return datacursor as dataset datacursor;
begin
          open dataset for
          select prod_key,prod_name from dim_product
          where contains (prod_keyword, concat(concat('%',search_string),'%')) >0 or contains (prod_desc, concat(concat('%',search_string),'%')) >0;
return dataset;
end search;
note :
type datacursor is ref cursor;The code is working fine. Now I want to expand this function from one word search to many words that the user passes into the function to search the table. How can I achieve that?
Thanks!
Arun

You will allow your users to pass a long string of words.
You will have written some code which parses that string and separates it into individual search words. This code will probably strip out any words supplied which Oracle Text considers to be stop words. You might also want to strip out things like 'AND' and 'OR', 'NOT' and "BT' (and anything else which can screw up Oracle Text syntactically, like brackets and other punctuation that has specific meaning to Oracle Text).
You will then write code to construct a meaningful search term, by re-concatenating the separate search words into a single search string that contains syntactically-correct AND or OR or NOT joins.
You then modify your existing code to use this new search string
If, for example, I type "Beans, Pie and Chips", your code would turn this into "Beans", "Pie", "Chips". Then you'd concatenate that to be "Beans|Pie|Chips" (or maybe 'beans and pie and chips'). Then you'd stick that into your existing contains syntax.
You will have to make up business rules for how users are allowed to type stuff in. Are they allowed to type in things like "Beans and (Pie or Chips)", for example? Do you simply dictate that 'all search terms will be combined' (and thus concatenate them with forced ANDs), or do you allow for ORs, ANDs and a mixture of the two? Do you allow NOTs? (One time I did this, I had to write 'parsing code' which, if it saw a minus in front of a word, knew to add that back into the final string with NOT in front of it, for example. So we allowed users to type things like "beans pie -chips" and that would become "(beans and pie) not chips".
You will also have to make up rules about string delimiters. Do you allow users to comma-delimit their search terms, space-delimit them or a combination? If you are doing space delimiters, you'll have to loop round the input string until all multiple spaces are reduced to single spaces. Then you can break the string into its separate words before re-concatenating them into a syntactically-correct contains clause.
Hope that helps a bit,
Regards
HJR

Error in Java Program when passing table to RFC function . JCO is used

Hai All,
I developed a JAVA application to update data into SAP using JCO via RFC. When i pass table to the function module i am getting the below error
com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (104) RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE: Conversion from type T to D not supported.
Please let me know how to solve this.
Below is my code
IRepository m_Repository;
IFunctionTemplate ftemplate;
JCO.Table PwdReq;
JCO.Function function;
m_Repository = JCO.createRepository("MYRepository", client);
            ftemplate = m_Repository.getFunctionTemplate("Z_GESEFM_UPD_PWD_RESET_REQUEST");
// Create a function from the template
function = new JCO.Function(ftemplate);
// Feeding in input parameters
PwdReq = function.getTableParameterList().getTable("RESULT2");
String userid = "PATCHTEST14 ", reqDate = "",reqNo = "01",reqStatus = "03", boxID = "09",ind2 = "X",
                    lcode = "abcd",rem = "One record testing";
PwdReq.appendRow();
                PwdReq.setValue(userid, "USERID");
                PwdReq.setValue(reqNo,"REQ_NO");
                PwdReq.setValue(reqStatus,"REQ_STATUS");
                PwdReq.setValue(boxID,"BOX_ID");
                PwdReq.setValue(ind2,"IND2");
                PwdReq.setValue(lcode,"LCODE");
                PwdReq.setValue(rem,"OTHER_REMARKS");
            // execute the function with the input parameters
            client.execute(function);
Thanks & Regards,
H.K.Hayath Basha.

hi,
I am not very good in Java.
but try this code to giving input parameter.
function.getImportParameterList().setValue(userid, "USERID");
if you are not using Try and Catch blok then use Try and Catch blok,
Regards
Manoj

Problem in adding Search function in HeadMast.

Hello All,
I am working on EP6 SP2 and wanted to know how can I add the Search function (which is on Toolbar and appears below the HeadMast in Portal), to be included as a prt of HeadMast.
Please refer to this link:
http://www.sapdesignguild.org/resources/htmlb_guidance/index.html
Under <b>General -> Customer Branding and Style Editor</b> topic, kindly refer to the 1st snapshot shown.
It shows Search within the MastHead Area.
I tried doing this by manually adding the code of Search into MastHead using MastHead.par file (in Eclipse 2.1) but it gives me an error saying " <i>No security zone - access is denied:</i> ". I really cannot make out the differnce where I am exactly goind wrong.
Can anyone please help me sort this.
Awaiting Reply.
Thanks and Warm Regards,
Ritu

Hi Senthil,
Firstly thank you for your input.
I have checked the Portalapp.xml file and found a Security tag. Its like:
<b>
<property name="SecurityZone" value="com.sap.portal/no_safety"/></b>
Is it OK??
Senthil, I have another question too?
I am new into Portal development programming, so am trying differnet options:
Another experimet I was just checking was:
1> I imported the existing Headmast.par & ToolArea.par file.
2> Integrated both the methods together into HeadMast.par file.
<i>The Help, Personlize& LogOut options that we see on right side of MastHead is into a table.
I want to insert the ToolArea below it (within the HeadMast), such that the search option appears below it.</i>
3> Integrated the Portalapp.xml file, added Property tags from Search Portalapp.xml file into HeadMast Portalapp.xml file.
4> To test whether its possible to add anything below the Help, Personalize & LogOut table, I have successfully added a text to check the results. I need to replace this text with the Search textbox & button.
Can it be possible this way...?
Am I exploring different options.
Have I missed anything in the above steps??
Please help.
Awaiting Reply.
Thanks and Warm Regards,
Ritu

Address book search functions

Is there any BlackBerry device which has a search function that will find all files which contain a certain word? For example, using the search function, I want to display a list of all of my contacts in DENVER.

I don't believe so, as the search function of the BB reads only the first, last and company name fields in the search, unless the word Denver is a part of one of those fields.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

CF search function

Trying to create a user defined search function and keep getting errors. I wanted a user to type in a search field and the query would return results that match and are also similar to their search criteria. here is the code:
here is the results page:
Can anyone spot whats wrong? I get an error that says something about a SQL syntax error and its point to line 19: "and glass is LIKE '#glass#%'
any help would be greatly appreciated.

now let me try to post my code again

<cfquery name="rsBulbs" datasource="rlBulbs">
SELECT item
FROM rlbBulbs
ORDER BY item ASC
</cfquery>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title>Member Search</title>
<link href="rlb.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
<div id="wrapper">
<cfinclude template="header.cfm">
<div id="main">
    <div id="sidebar"><cfinclude template="sidebar.cfm"></div>
    <div id="content">
      <h2>Search for a Member</h2>
      <form action="results.cfm" method="post">
        <table width="500" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0">
          <tr>
            <td colspan="2" valign="top"><p>Please enter data in one or more of the
              fields below and <br />
              click the Search button.<br />
              </p></td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th>Item Number:</th>
            <td><input type="text" name="item" size="50" /></td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th>Base Type:</th>
            <td><input type="text" name="base" size="50" /></td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th>Glass Type:</th>
            <td><input type="text" name="glass" size="50" /></td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="center" colspan="2"><input type="submit" value="Search" />
              <input type="reset" value="Reset" name="reset" />          </td>
          </tr>
        </table>
      </form>
        </div>
</div>
<cfinclude template="footer.cfm">
</div>
</body>
</html>
results page:
<cfparam name="FORM.item" default="" type="String">
<cfparam name="FORM.base" default="" type="String">
<cfparam name="FORM.glass" default="" type="String">

<cfquery name="rsSearch" datasource="rlBulbs">
SELECT      id,
   item,
   base,
   glass,
FROM rlbbulbs
WHERE 0 = 0
<cfif item IS NOT "">
AND item LIKE '#item#%'
</cfif>
<cfif base IS NOT "">
AND base LIKE '#base#%'
</cfif>
<cfif glass IS NOT "">
AND glass LIKE '#glass#%'
</cfif>
ORDER BY item
</cfquery>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title>Members Search Results</title>
<link href="members.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
<cfinclude template="header-members.cfm">
<h2>Search Results</h2>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
    <th>Item</th>
    <th>Base</th>
    <th>Glass</th>
</tr>
<cfoutput query="rsSearch">
    <tr>
      <td><a href="details.cfm?id=#rsSearch.id#">#item#</a> </td>
      <td><a href="details.cfm?id=#rsSearch.id#">#base#</a> </td>
      <td><a href="details.cfm?id=#rsSearch.id#">#glass#</a> </td>
    </tr>
</cfoutput>
</table>
<cfinclude template="footer-members.cfm">
</body>
</html>

Search function in Help not working in any application

The Search function is not working in any application's Help. Upon entering the terms I need help for I get a hang at "Searching..." but never any result. This problem started sometime in the last year or so. Prior to that the search function in Help worked fine. My network connectivity is excellent.
I recently reinstalled OS X 10.5 but I'm sure the problem existed before that and persisted after the reinstall.
The reinstall was due to upgrading to 10.7 and only then finding that I had lost needed functionality, but I don't think this has anything to do with the current problem. All other aspects of Help seem to be working fine
I don't find any reference to this problem anywhere so I'm hoping someone can help with my Help(!) problem. Thanks in advance.

Try running your Leopard install disk again, as well as the 10.5.8 combo updater. This might reinstall any 'missing bits'.
You can do this without deleting the hard drive, just install straight over your existing system, but close all applications and external devices first.
Or you could also do this via an Archive and Instal:
How to Archive & Install:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1710
and this also:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2196?viewlocale=en_US
This document explains how to correctly reinstall a prior version of Mac OS X in the event that other troubleshooting does not resolve an issue:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25404
BUT: Don't install older versions of Mac OS than what came with your computer:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2186?viewlocale=en_US

When an album has multiple artist how can you make them show up on an iPod Touch 4G? I can find an artist using the search function but they don't show up in the artist view on my iPod. iTunes shows them OK when you sort by artist.

Tech support seemed to understand the question but had no answer. Why would an album with only one artist show the artist but an album with multiple artist not show any of them. The album art show various in iTunes. That makes sense but on my iPod I would expect to see all artists.

Wish I did. I tried the group function but that didn't help in iTunes. The search function is the best I came up with. I can answer the question do you have susch and such artist. But I can't browse for an artist I don't remember exactly or have misspelled. Fortunately I don't think I've bought anything from iTunes that i already had. If you can't see an artist it's possible you think you don't have something you actually do have. Sorry, still hoping for a better work around or better yet a fix.

Support code table in searching function

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for