Support for 32" LED TV model no 32PS1V

Where do I find support for Toshiba 32" LED TV model no 32PS1V. I am looking for firmware upgrades to allow for USB avi compatibility as this model currently only supports JPEG photos and NOT movies.

Your 100% - I have a Toshiba 32C110U with the SAME? problem.
I get ".MP3" ONLY from my USBs - No Picture (.jpg) or Video ??? -
WHERE is THE FIRMWARE we NEED Toshiba !!
Maybe someone has a 'Hack' site with a FIX.
Garry

Similar Messages

Camera Raw Support for Canon 7D MkII

Just trying to get some idea if I should spend the $99.00 to buy Aperture from the Apple Store. This might sound a little over the top, but the work flow I miss by not having RAW support in Lightroom is worth the expense of buying Aperture.
I do find it very disappointing that Adobe have not as yet provided support for the new Canon 7D MkII. This will be a VERY popular camera.
More importantly I find this tardiness on Adobe's part very disappointing because they market CC buy saying "You will always have up to date software". When you consider Apple and Google Picasa have both already supported the Canon 7D MkII. I might add they both had support for the camera within days of it's release on 31 of Oct.
So after my little rant.
Can anybody from Adobe advise when we will see Camera Raw support the new Canon 7DMkII?
Even if it is in Beta form I would be very happy to be a Beta tester. I have very extensive experience in testing software and would be prepared to do structured Beta testing. I would be very happy if someone from Adobe Labs would contact me for the purpose of Beta testing Camera Raw support for the 7D MkII.
Kind Regards
Tom Croll

Thanks ssprengel, you have clearly put into words what is currently reality at Adobe, and confirmed my suspicion of Aperture being a dead product. Although Google's Picasa is not dead.
I do realize Adobe Products are very well developed and software does take time to perfect before it gets released. I have been in the software development game for 35 years
But Camera RAW is an adjunct to Lightroom, Photoshop, Premier Pro etc. As such the support for new camera models should be a relatively simple exercise and should not be held up by other R&D on the products that Camera Raw plugs into. I believe they have in the past released updates to Camera Raw that essentially was just for new camera models. I do realize I could be wrong on this point, but I fail to see why they can't achieve this outcome.
Also, as I said Adobe Market Creative Cloud membership saying you will always be up to date. Or words to that effect.
To have an Adobe support person get upset because he has a large number of people pestering Adobe, and not him personally, trying to get ans answer as to the timing of the release of support for a new camera model, quite frankly is totally unacceptable. Not acceptable to the customers and not acceptable to the poor support person who has to handle disgruntled customers due to poor planning on Adobe's part.
In my original post I made a very serious offer to do Beta Testing on support for the Canon 7DMkII Raw files. But when i last checked with Adobe Labs the current Beta does not include support for this camera.
There maybe extenuating circumstances around the timely supply of this support. Like when did Canon provide the Specs for the 7D MkII and are those specs so different from other currently supported models. Even some feedback as to what the problem is, would help us understand.
I hope I have expressed my thoughts objectively and hope this discussion stream will get to management at Adobe. In fact I am very inclined to ensure it does get to senior management. I don't want to start writing a personal letter to the Chairman of Adobe's Board, but sometimes things do need a shake up.
Kind Regards
Tom Croll

Canvio External HDD HDWC130XK3J1 -Is There Really No Support For This?

I bought a Toshiba Canvio 3TB external HDD USB 3 model number: HDWC130XK3J1.
When I access the Product Support page of Toshiba, there is no model number for the HDWC130XK3JI (but there is for an HDWC120XK3J1).
Is there really no support for the 3 TB model? For example, how do I go about making a warranty claim when the warranty tab - Enter your Serial Number and / or Model-Part Number (computer, tablet, TV only) - will not even recognise my serial number? Very frustrating!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

For future reference:
http://acclaim.toshiba.com/
worked for me today. Dunno whether it will work for you tomorrow. :-(
--- Stardance
nil carborundum illegitimi

Is it possible to add support for new database type in Data Modeler?

Hi,
I see that Data Modeler v.4 supports different versions of Oracle, DB2 and MS SQL. Is it possible to add support for a new database family,
PostgreSQL for example? I hoped that RDBMS Site editor can do it, but so far I don't see any possibility to add XML files with metadata for a new RDBMS.
I did it previously for PowerDesigner were it is possible to add and modify definitions for new relational databases.
Thank you,
Sergei

There is discussion option as an out of the box feature. Check this: BI launch pad 4.0: Participate in a discussion about a document

Support for legacy models

You might ask... Handly sounds interesting, but can it be of any use if I already have a code model with a well-established API? (Or, perhaps, you'd like to use Handly in a greenfield, but are a bit uncomfortable about the leakage of Handly API to your model's clients.)
If this sort of questions makes you delay considering Handly adoption, perhaps you should wait no longer. Handly can support legacy models while still providing the benefits of a uniform handle-based API. Find out how in this blog post:
https://pisv.wordpress.com/2015/07/09/handly-support-for-legacy-models/

Fax files are nothing but picture files. Chances are a program like Graphic Converter could open the files. You can download it and try it for free.
http://www.lemkesoft.de/en/index.htm

Is model M8852LL/B applecare for MacBooks still supported for macbook airs?

is model M8852LL/B applecare for MacBooks still supported for macbook airs?

Applecare must be purchased prior to the expiration of the original warranty period.
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MD014/applecare-protection-plan-for-macbook-ai r-13-macbook-pro
Ciao.
Message was edited by: OGELTHORPE

Lte support for lumia 1520 model in india

hi,
am planning to buy the lumia 1520 here in india.
What is the model number [ rm 937 or rm 938 or rm 939 or rm 940 ] of the model sold officially in india ?
does this model have support for 4g/lte networks, irrespective of the fact that carriers in india currently do not offer 4g/lte networks ?
is it true that even if the model has 4g/lte support, it is disabled for sale in india ?
Thanks in advance
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi hardisk88,
Welcome to the Nokia Support Discussions!
The RM model compatible with India is RM-937. The phone supports LTE frequency bands, however your network provider should also support this service to enjoy LTE connections using your Lumia 1520 in India. Here's the supported LTE frequency bands: LTE bands: 2100, 1800, 2600, 900, 200.
Hope this helps.

MST Support for MacBook Pro Retina Late 2013 - DisplayPort 1.2 - Will it ever happen? (with sources)

So back in October, I purchased a brand new Macbook Pro Retina (MBPr), fully loaded with top of the line specs. I was soooo excited to have Thunderbolt 2 tech which Intel AND Apple describes as having DisplayPort 1.2a compatibility - which up to this point is unfortunately NOT the case. The point of the information/questions and requests in this article is to engage a conversation about the issues of not having MST support after Apple falsely mislead their consumers to think otherwise - especially when it is clear the MBPr is capable. Please read on...
Apple advertises that the Thunderbolt 2 ports on BOTH the MBPr and the new Mac Pro (NMP) will have 4K Display support with the famed 20gb/sec Ports (DisplayPort 1.2 only requires a little above 17gb/sec). Now that the 10.9.1 update has been released, we have failed to see MST or Multi-Stream Transport enabled on the MBPr Late 2013. Now, as for the New Mac Pro- it DOES have MST enabled in 10.9.1 with the AMD GPUs. For all of you out there that's questioning what this means, short answer is basically the Mac Pro will be able to power a 4K Monitor at 60Hz through the Thunderbolt 2 Port but the New MBPr is stuck with only HDMI 1.4 support which tops out at 4K 30Hz. 30Hz is unacceptable for anything but movies or a photo slideshow. At 30Hz the cursor will jump across the screen, eliminating any of the benefits of 4K.
BUT it gets worse...
Apple can be seen advertising that the new MBPr 15" model can power a 4K monitor THROUGH the Thunderbolt 2 Port here: http://www.apple.com/thunderbolt - This article quotes the following:
"Now with Thunderbolt 2 built into the new Mac Pro and MacBook Pro with Retina display, you can connect the latest 4K desktop displays and get double the bandwidth for your peripherals. And the two generations of Thunderbolt technology are compatible with each other."
Does this not let the consumer assume that the newest MBPr will be able to drive a 4K display through the Thunderbolt 2 Port? I would say yes it does, but at the time I wrote this, the TB2 Ports can't power a 4K display because, as previously stated, MST is disabled in Mavericks for the 15" MBPr Late 2013.
NOW, later on Apple posted the following article on 4K support here: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6008
4K support on the MacBook Pro (Retina, Late 2013)
MacBook Pro supports 4K displays and Ultra HD TVs at the following resolutions and refresh rates with the built-in HDMI port:
3840 x 2160 at 30 Hz refresh rate
4096 x 2160 at 24 Hz refresh rate (mirroring is not supported at this resolution)
In the article above the New Mac Pro is listed as having support for a 4K Display with the Thunderbolt 2 Port (or MST DisplayPort 1.2a Technology) at 60Hz with no problem. This leads myself and many others to believe that MST will NEVER be enabled on the newest MacBook Pro Retina with Nvidia GPUs. Yes, 4K IS supported but ONLY through the HDMI 1.4 port, which has the limitation of only 30hz. This two-faced advertising is extremely upsetting to a LOT of people, including myself.
Interestingly enough, THIS IS NOT a hardware issue. If one ventures into Windows 8.1 via Bootcamp and connects a 4K Display via the Thunderbolt 2 (or through DP1.2) Port, the Display registers at 60Hz, thus proving that the Thundberbolt 2 Hub Controller is completely capable of MST DisplayPort functionality. Clearly this a driver issue with Apple, Nvidia or Intel or any combination. What Apple has done here is forcing any professional that desires stable and clear 4K technology through their MacBook Pro Retina to do so only using Windows 8.1 on their own machines! Definitely an oxymoron if you ask me...
Later on when the Mac Pro was ready for ordering, Apple placed the Sharp PN-K321 as a compatible option for a 4K Display. On the Store page featuring the (over three thousand dollar) Sharp 4K display, located here http://store.apple.com/us/product/HD971LL/A/sharp-32-pn-k321-4k-ultra-hd-led-mon itor?fnode=53 Apple states the following:
"Note that 4K DisplayPort operation is only compatible with the new Mac Pro (Late 2013)."
All of that being said, and I'm terribly sorry for my wordy ranting...
This brings me to a final two requests to ANYONE reading this post:
a) Has anyone working with the new 10.9.2 Beta Update seen evidence that DisplayPort 1.2 capabilities will be enabled for the new MacBook Pro Retina (Nvidia 750M) with the promised "Graphics Driver Updates" within the next Mavericks update?
and
b) To others that purchased or were/are thinking of purchasing a new MacBook Pro Retina with TB2 Ports: If you are just as upset as me about this crushing blow to consumers that just purchased a $3,000 laptop that were promised something that wasn't delivered - I urge you please, write to Apple and let them know they are making a mistake. You can do this though the support page or through http://www.apple.com/feedback
Thank you for your precious time, and if anyone has anything to contribute to this issue, please jump in....

GOOD NEWS!
The Mavericks 10.9.3 update adds official support for Thunderbolt 2, 4K!
I'm not sure if you will be able to daisy chain anything to the 4K display. I've read that the design of Thunderbolt 2 includes support for DisplayPort 1.2 multi-stream (MST), which allows this type of daisy chaining with 4K, but we don't know if Apple has this supported on it's machines. Apparently it's been buggy in development because the graphics driver needs to work correctly with the Thunderbolt 2 host controller. I'm sure they will work it out if they haven't already.
The above is all via found information on this topic, but you can follow some more discussion here:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1713876
One more note on Thunderbolt worth sharing: always keep your fastest peripherals closer to the computer in the chain. If you have a TB1 device directly connected to the computer, anything further down the chain will be limited to TB1 speed/capability regardless of it's native speed. Always connect TB2 devices first, and save anything TB1 for the end of the chain.

"error: thread-local storage not supported for this target"

I have a program that uses the __thread specifier, to be run on a Solaris 9/UltraSprac.
I am not able to compile it using gcc 3.4.4 or 4.0.4, it emits the msg "error: thread-local storage not supported for this target".
xz@gamera% gcc -v -Wall -D_REENTRANT -c -o func_stack.o func_stack.c
Reading specs from /opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/specs
Configured with: ../srcdir/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/3.4.4 --disable-nls
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.4
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/cc1 -quiet -v -D_REENTRANT -DMESS func_stack.c -quiet -dumpbase func_stack.c -mcpu=v7 -auxbase-strip func_stack.o -Wall -version -o /var/tmp//cc0poHSN.s
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.8/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/include
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C version 3.4.4 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
        compiled by GNU C version 3.4.4.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
func_stack.c:16: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
func_stack.c:17: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
func_stack.c:19: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
xs@gamera% gcc -v -D_REENTRANT -c -o func_stack.o func_stack.c
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.9
Configured with: /net/clpt-v490-0/export/data/bldmstr/20070711_mars_gcc/src/configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-checking=release --disable-libmudflap --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-cpu=v9 --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.4 (gccfss)
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/cc1 -quiet -v -I. -iprefix /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/ -D__sparcv8 -D_REENTRANT -DMESS func_stack.c -quiet -dumpbase func_stack.c -mcpu=v9 -auxbase-strip func_stack.o -version -m32 -o /tmp/ccjsdswh.s -r /tmp/cc2w4ZRo.ir
ignoring nonexistent directory "/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include
/usr/sfw/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss) (sparc-sun-solaris2.9)
        compiled by GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
func_stack.c:16: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
func_stack.c:17: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
func_stack.c:19: error: thread-local storage not supported for this targetJust as comparison, the corresponding output of compiling another file which does not have __thread declaration is as follows:
xz@gamera% gcc -v -Wall -D_REENTRANT -c -o common.o common.c
Reading specs from /opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/specs
Configured with: ../srcdir/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/3.4.4 --disable-nls
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.4
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/cc1 -quiet -v -D_REENTRANT -DMESS common.c -quiet -dumpbase common.c -mcpu=v7 -auxbase-strip common.o -Wall -version -o /var/tmp//cc4VxrLz.s
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.8/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/include
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C version 3.4.4 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
        compiled by GNU C version 3.4.4.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
/usr/ccs/bin/as -V -Qy -s -xarch=v8 -o common.o /var/tmp//cc4VxrLz.s
/usr/ccs/bin/as: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 Compiler Common 6.2 Solaris_9_CBE 2001/04/02Note that the last 2 lines seem to suggest that a Sun assembler is used as the back-end of gcc. I am not sure whether the failure to compile the first file (with __thread) was due to the incompatibility of this Sun assembler. In the first case, the error msg was emitted before these 2 lines are printed.
I further read a post about gcc 3.3.3's inability to compile code that has __thread in it, on a HP-UX 11.11: http://forums12.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1216595175060+28353475&threadId=1148976 The conclusion seems to suggest that "the 2.17 GNU assembler did not support thread local storage" and gcc sees that and thus disallows TLS.
If the assembler is the culprit, then does anyone know whether this "Sun WorkShop 6 update 2" assembler in my installation can work with TLS? And how come a Sun assembler becomes the back-end of gcc? I read that gas (the GNU assembler) is the default backend of gcc. (How) can one specify the assembler to be used for gcc?
As an aside, I am able to compile my file on this same Solaris 9/UltraSparc platform using the Sun Studio 12 C Compiler:
xz@gamera% cc -V -# -D_REENTRANT -c -o func_stack.o func_stack.c
cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_sparc Patch 124867-01 2007/07/12
### Note: NLSPATH = /pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/../lib/locale/%L/LC_MESSAGES/%N.cat:/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/../../lib/locale/%L/LC_MESSAGES/%N.cat
###     command line files and options (expanded):
### -c -D_REENTRANT -V func_stack.c -o func_stack.o
/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/acomp -xldscope=global -i func_stack.c -y-fbe -y/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/fbe -y-xarch=generic -y-xmemalign=8i -y-o -yfunc_stack.o -y-verbose -y-xthreadvar=no%dynamic -y-comdat -xdbggen=no%stabs+dwarf2+usedonly -V -D_REENTRANT -m32 -fparam_ir -Qy -D__SunOS_5_9 -D__SUNPRO_C=0x590 -D__SVR4 -D__sun -D__SunOS -D__unix -D__sparc -D__BUILTIN_VA_ARG_INCR -D__C99FEATURES__ -Xa -D__PRAGMA_REDEFINE_EXTNAME -Dunix -Dsun -Dsparc -D__RESTRICT -xc99=%all,no%lib -D__FLT_EVAL_METHOD__=0 -I/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/include/cc "-g/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/cc -V -D_REENTRANT -c -o func_stack.o " -fsimple=0 -D__SUN_PREFETCH -destination_ir=yabe
acomp: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_sparc Patch 124867-01 2007/07/12Interestingly, the output no longer mentions the "/usr/ccs/bin/as: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2" assembler.

Just as another comparison, I compiled a file without __thread on the Solaris 9/UltraSparc platform using gcc 4.0.4. Not surprisingly it worked. But I no longer see the mention of the Sun assembler as in the case of gcc 3.4.4. Nor did I see the mention of "GNU assembler" as in the case of gcc 4.0.4/Solaris 10/x86. Instead, I saw something called "iropt" and "cg". Does anyone know what they are?
xz@gamera% gcc -v -Wall -D_REENTRANT -c -o common.o common.c
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.9
Configured with: /net/clpt-v490-0/export/data/bldmstr/20070711_mars_gcc/src/configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-checking=release --disable-libmudflap --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-cpu=v9 --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.4 (gccfss)
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/cc1 -quiet -v -iprefix /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/ -D__sparcv8 -D_REENTRANT -DMESS common.c -quiet -dumpbase common.c -mcpu=v9 -auxbase-strip common.o -Wall -version -m32 -o /tmp/ccSGJIDD.s -r /tmp/ccKuJz76.ir
ignoring nonexistent directory "/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include
/usr/sfw/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss) (sparc-sun-solaris2.9)
        compiled by GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/SUNW0scgfss/4.0.4/prod/bin/iropt -F -xarch=v8plus -xchip=generic -O1 -xvector=no -xbuiltin=%none -xcache=generic -Qy -h_gcc -o /tmp/ccUl4mVM.ircg /tmp/ccKuJz76.ir -N/dev/null -is /tmp/ccSGJIDD.s
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/SUNW0scgfss/4.0.4/prod/bin/cg -Qy -xarch=v8plus -xchip=generic -OO0 -T3 -Qiselect-C0 -Qrm:newregman:coalescing=0 -xcode=abs32 -xcache=generic -xmemalign=8i -il /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4//gccbuiltins.il -xvector=no -xthreadvar=no%dynamic -xbuiltin=%none -Qassembler-ounrefsym=0 -Qiselect-T0 -Qassembler-I -Qassembler-U -comdat -h_gcc -is /tmp/ccSGJIDD.s -ir /tmp/ccUl4mVM.ircg -oo common.o

No Support for Windows 7! Extremely Frustrated! Help!

Ok, so here's the deal. I have TX1220us tablet pc. It came with Vista 32-bit Home Premium on it. Everybody knows that Vista is a resource hog, and running the 32-bit version on a 2.2 gig 64-bit processor is a complete waste of performance capabilities. So, what's the ideal thing to do? Upgrade to Windows 7 Ultimate of course! Not so easy... After upgrading, almost nothing works properly on my computer. I did this 8-10 months ago, and immediately noticed the problems. My CD/DVD Lightscribe Drive only functions partially, it only reads some discs and won't burn anything. The fingerprint sensor doesn't function at all. Worst of all, the digitizer (touchscreen) is no longer touch sensitive. The quick launch buttons werent working for a while, but I installed some vista drivers, and luckily was able to get 2 of the 4 to work.
So what do I do? I talk to HP Support for help. Unfortunately, the only "support" that I could get out of them was in the form of a few sentences. "Unfortunately, HP does not recommend upgrading from the pre-installed operating system. HP does not support anything but the pre-installed operating system" and "This is something that HP is currently developing, and we will update the support page as soon as updates are available for your hardware". The irony of this all is this: At the exact time that HP gave me the first statement, there was an ad with a link from HP on the right margin of my models support page stating "The Wait for Windows 7 is Over! Upgrading your computer has never been easier!".
Again this was 8-10 months ago that I went through all of this, and now I finally decided to give it another try. You'd think in 10 months that they would be able to develop some sort of updates for customers. Wrong... I once again received the exact same responses with absolutely no sense of concern or care for the happiness of a customer from the support representative. I have finally decided that this is some sort of marketing scheme or sales scam to force their customers to go out and buy a new computer, even though there is no need for it. My laptop is 300x faster on Win7 x64 than it was on Vista, and after paying for an expensive new operating system for a tablet that i purchased only 3 years ago for $1,600 I have no intent on going out and purchasing a new one just so I can run Windows 7.
Does anybody know who to talk to about getting issues like this resolved or to get compensation for HP's complete lack of care for customer satisfaction? Any info would be nice. Finally, if anybody has come up with a way to get this system working properly on Win 7, I'm open for suggestions. I have tried installing HP Vista drivers on my system, but when I run the setup packages, they exit out saying that the setup programs are designed for windows vista, that it has detected a different operating system, and that the setup will now exit.
Help!
tx1220us - Windows 7 Ultimate x64 - Nothing but problems

I think you would be very surprised at how many of your drivers are supported natively by Windows 7. I have an even newer AMD laptop which I installed W7 on and had to install very few drivers. Running Windows Update manually from Control Panel and choosing to also see 'Optional' updates gave me those.
******Clicking the Thumbs-Up button is a way to say -Thanks!.******
**Click Accept as Solution on a Reply that solves your issue to help others**

Print driver for HP Designjet 5500 (Model Q1251A)

Looking for print driver for HP Designjet 5500 (Model Q1251A), non-PS (post script) printer for MacBook Pro, OS X 10.7.5. Current drivers on HP web support does not have driver for the non-PS printer and directs me to Apple's support site, but can't find location to look for a driver.

Hello ..
Try here > OS X: Printer and scanner software available for download

SOLVED - BIOS UPDATE "SYSTEM DOES NOT CONTAIN the NECESSARY WMI SUPPORT for this VERSION of HPQflash

If you get infamous error when updating HP Portables (laptops/notebooks/ netbooks) BIOS within Windows:
"SYSTEM DOES NOT CONTAIN THE NECESSARY WMI SUPPORT FOR THIS VERSION OF HPQFLASH":
I am posting a solution found for own business laptop (HP 8540W & 8760W) so WebSearch engines index/register it in a few days - future sufferers come here and get a SOLUTION, finally. Disreagrd previous "experts" advises, they don't work 100% & pity on TechSupport folks who get HP paychecks yet don't know products their co. designs/manufactures (on deep Technical level):
Below is a SOLUTION (WORKING) !
Go into Services (Run "services.msc" or get there thru ControlPanel-->AdminTools-->), find following 2 services ==> make sure they're running, chances are they're NOT (as in my case I keep them disabled unless need running):
1) "HP Software Framework"
2) "HP Service" [no typo - a real plain name]
If not running, set Properties-->Manual and click "Start", make sure both are running.
Rerun BIOS updater, choose option for "Within Windows" or something to that effect (using HPQ/ROMpaq updater), rather than "create USB BootDisk on Key", this time it should work without the hassle of a BootDisk creation.
Should work from within Windows environment.
Notes:
a) Likely only one (1) service is responsible - namely "HP Software Framework" for HPQ Updater to fail, but doesn't hurt to reenable/restart both services.
I in fact am responding to other customers who elect to Update BIOS within Windows, perhaps oldfashioned but to me Boot Updater is more natural & always works regardless of WMI Support.
b) After done, don't forget:
*) Recheck BIOS settings - update may've added new and/or changed old, so rescan tobe sure.
**) Go BACK into Windows-->Services.msc & redisable both aforementioned Services if were originally disabled; or you're a computer Pro, you know what you're doing & like me keep all HP services disabled. The ones we got on EliteBook 8760W are pests consuming system resources, you just enable "Software Framework" when occasional issues emerge with HP softupdate (typically no issues) & redisable after use, rest of services are bloatware - some attempt to overrun Windows Wireless console, some seekout HP Networked printers (Ethernet, Wireless, but not USB), some do this & that - I study/know which one does what and decided to disable all. This is called a "minimalist" philosophy & turns your machine into a fast beast, I recently sold a very obsolete 4-year laptop which however handles 3DMCAD & complex designs/simulations, better new machines out fo a store, as new machines are loaded w/bloatware chocking down resources.
BUT nobody is requiring you to disable anything though.
The solution merely states the fact:
These 2 (or 1) services when not running halt BIOS Update "within Windows" (you can still run "BootDisk option", however, if preferred).
Simply restartung them solves your problem. Usually
Ya'll have a good day and enjoy!
===========
BELOW ARE IMPORTANT WARNINGS:
1) IF YOUR BIOS UPDATE STILL FAILS, SOME OTHER PIECE IN WMI SUPPORT IS MISSING - IN MY CASE WAS THESE 2 SERVICES, BUT THERE'S REMOTE POSSIBILITY SOMETHING ELSE MIGHT BLOCK UPDATER. DON'T WASTE TIME & CHOOSE "USB/BootDisk" options instead
2) Once BIOS updater does its job, will ask to auto-restart - let it go on & complete, it will self-shutdown (click "Next" to skip 60-second timer), then do NOT turn it on manually!, wait - it'll turn on by itself in 15 seconds, let it boot into Windows, you're done!
3) WARNING: close other apps before proceeding, be 100% sure your ACpower won't be interrupted or better yet - make sure battery is in/charged (so if ACpower accidentally disconnects, you're autoswitched onto battery) b/c power loss may result in severe damage to internal hardware. In the old days it'd result in fatal damage, these days powerloss would still result in a major repair (ROM chip corruption).
So to summarize: those 2 services I specified, are often responsible for whether HPQ/ROMpaq will or won't run.
Other causes possible, but I've not witnessed; and if so - choose BootDisk option.
===
Stan M. Starinski, MSEE.

Hello Ceramics.
Your ProBook is an Enterprise model. It would be a good idea to also post your question to the HP Business Boards as those forums deal specifically with that kind of product. Here is a link.
Have a great day!
Please click the white star under my name to give me Kudos as a way to say "Thanks!"
Click the "Accept as Solution" button if I resolve your issue.

Lack of support for rented movies

Last night I rented a movie from the AppleTV. It appeared to download okay. But when I tried to play it, all I got was a white screen.
I immediately tried to call Apple support. After a few minutes with the voice response system, it told me they were closed – call tomorrow. Why didn’t the voice response system say that at the beginning?
I called early next morning (6:30am PDT). After navigating through the voice response system, I got a technician who asked for my AppleTV serial number and verified that I had an AppleCare agreement. After about 20 min of research, he told me to unplug the AppleTV, wait 30 sec., then plug it back in and see if that fixes the problem. Well, it did – I could view the movie. He told me the problem is due to the way the firmware handles an HDMI connection – but only with rented movies. What??? The technician then said “good, we fixed the problem you’re good to go.”
I said not so fast – and asked how Apple was going to compensate me for going through the motions of downloading a rented movie, trying to troubleshoot and calling in (only to be told I was SOL), spending 45 min the next morning, and never being able to see the movie due to an Apple hardware problem. The technician put me on the phone with his “supervisor” - again a 5 min wait on hold.
The supervisor asked what was the problem – since I still had 12 more hours to watch the movie (we were talking at 6:30am). Then she had the audacity to say there wasn’t a “technical problem” since un-plugging the AppleTV reset it and I could now see the movie. I told her that I wanted to watch the movie last night and there most certainly was a technical problem at that time - i.e., white screen. She reluctantly said that she would “try” to get me a refund for the movie.
I then asked her how was I suppose to get support in real-time for AppleTV download issues? She again reiterated that their hours are 6-6 and they don’t accept support calls after 6pm PDT. She asked why I didn’t go on-line and seek help on the Apple Web site. Excuse me? I was sitting down to dinner with my family who wanted to watch the rented movie. Going off to a computer to research an Apple hardware problem wouldn’t have been politically correct under the circumstances.
I also told her that the technician wouldn’t talk to me without evidence of a AppleCare support agreement on the AppleTV. Hey, a rented movie wouldn’t play. Why do I need an Apple support agreement to merely get what I paid for? I asked, what if I had just purchased the AppleTV, how would I solve this sort of problem? She said that I could have paid a one time $49 support charge to get someone to tell me to unplug the AppleTV. Mind you, that’s a $49 charge to see a $4.99 movie due to a known problem with Apple’s firmware. Unbelievable!
Given the frustration of not getting the movie to play (at dinner time), no realistic support to fix the problem, and the baffling conversation with Apple’s insensitive support manager - all I was offered is someone will “try” to get me a refund.
Okay, this won’t happen to me again. Because I won’t be renting or downloading movies from Apple’s service. Sorry I bought the AppleTV - wonder if I can get a refund for it?

I agree the OP could not have known to restart the device but I do rather think their expectations after receiving help were unrealistic.
From the Applecare diagnosis it was an issue with the tv that led to the OP being unable to watch their movie when they wanted, not the rental, and technically one would need warranty or Applecare to receive phone based support for the tv.
I accept it was unfortunate the OP's experience wasn't as it should have been and that it was made a little worse by not being able to speak to someone out of hours, although I do see the need for staff to verify that Applecare has been purchased with each caller.
At the end of the day, the OP's issue was resolved and their was no financial loss to the OP. These things happen, it's unreasonable to expect, or fulminate over not getting, some form of compensation, (although it wouldn't be unreasonable to ask for the rental for free without expectation). What sort of compensation does one thing you would get from Canon if your video camera broke down in the middle of filming your sons graduation day ceremony.

Support for n-channel icc-profiles

I have recently attended a symposium where some speakers touched on Photoshop’s (or the whole CS’) lack of support for n-channel ICC-profiles.
And (while I have to admit that the ramifications may be beyond my comprehension) the point seems very much valid.
I suspect this issue might also concern the matter of the Spot Channels-and-Layers-situation that has come up in this Forum repeatedly and changing the current situation may well fall in the neighbourhood of Programming and Nightmare.
Moreover the question of who should or could provide those profiles in any quality regarding the overprint behaviour of the tints (and their possible combinations) would appear daunting.
Still, even a simplyfied physical model may be an impovement to the recent situation.
Plus, as the speakers pointed out, anything above a 7-channel profile is hardly realistic, anyway.
In all probablity Adobe is already aware of the matter through its contacts with/in ICC, FOGRA and other bodies concerned with printing-matters (and their representative at said symposium).
Nonetheless I would like to voice my support for the demand to see n-channel ICC-profile-support in Photoshop.
Edit: This might be especially beneficial with flexo-printing in CMYKOGB (CMYK + orange + green + blue) – I don’t have enough experience with flexo to judge this with any statistical relevance, but it seems to be fairly popular.

Thanks for Your answers.
changing to support an arbitrary number of channels of color data will require a huge number of changes to the application to make even common features work
Understandably.
But it would seem that this may be a solution to certain dissatisfactions with the Spot Channels’ behaviour that have come up in this Forum, too.
Well, not a straightforward solution, I guess, as one may not want to separate an image using the additional Channels but keep that in CMY(K) and only use the Spots for graphic elements etc. … and if Photoshop were to provide seven-Channels-Layers I suspect it wouldn’t be long until someone asks for eight.
The packaging-industry’s needs don’t seem to be met by the CS currently, but the cost-benefit-considerations are certainly valid.

Why No Support For HP hd7500s Personal Media Drive?

I have a Personal Media Drive hd7500s (750 gb), installed in the equipment bay, that my HP Pavillion has stopped recognizing. There is power to the drive as indicated by the lights on the front. General Troubleshooting info at this site suggests I attempt to hook it up as an external drive, using the USB connection. Before I can, however, the USB port on the back of the personal media drive appears to have a plastic protective cap on the USB contacts; but I am wary of using any more plier force than I've already applied to remove this unsuccessfully. So I went to this site looking for tech data on my drive.
No matter how many different ways I enter the SKU, the model number, even the serial number of this HP Personal Media Drive, the search returns nothing. What gives??

Apparently HP does not offer support for this device. Seems pretty bad as I purchased mine about a year ago and if I had known HP was not going to support it I would not have purchased it....SUPRISE, I guess that is why they did not tell me!!!

Support for 32" LED TV model no 32PS1V

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for