Support for 3g2 video format?

I'm using Premiere Pro CS3, and I don't see how to export to 3g2 format for my Samsung phone. Does PP CS3 support 3g2? If so, how do I get to that format? If not, is there some other way to output to 1 format and convert to 3g2? Thanks in advance to all replies!
I'm a newbie to PP, so please be gentle! ha!
Chris

See the section
File formats supported for export in the PPro Help.
Frequently answered question
Cheers
Eddie
Forum FAQ
Premiere Pro Wiki
- Over 250 frequently answered questions
- Over 100 free tutorials
- Maintained by editors like
you

Similar Messages

  • [svn:osmf:] 10440: Add parser support for the Video tag.

    Revision: 10440
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-09-20 15:03:56 -0700 (Sun, 20 Sep 2009)
    Log Message:
    Add parser support for the Video tag.  Add unit test for an empty document.
    Modified Paths:
        osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/.flexLibProperties
        osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/org/openvideoplayer/vast/model/VASTInlineAd.as
        osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/org/openvideoplayer/vast/parser/VASTParser.as
        osmf/trunk/libs/VASTTest/org/openvideoplayer/vast/parser/TestVASTParser.as
    Added Paths:
        osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/org/openvideoplayer/vast/model/VASTMediaFile.as
        osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/org/openvideoplayer/vast/model/VASTVideo.as

    The video tag only supports a few formats and MKV (Matroska Multimedia Container) isn't one of them.<br />
    Your only option is to use the object (or embed) tag and use a player that can handle that format.<br />
    If might be better to switch to the WebM format.<br />
    * https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Media_formats_supported_by_the_audio_and_video_elements

  • Possibility to assign a color profile in the color management tab for more video formats

    Presently, in After Effects CS5, in the color management tab of the "Interpret Footage" dialog box the possibility to assign a color profile to footage is grayed out for many video formats.
    Formats that allow to assign a color profile include Quicktime/JPEG2000, Quicktime/Motion JPEG A, Quicktime/Motion JPEG B, Quicktime/MPEG-4, Quicktime/Animation as well as various image sequences, like tiff-sequences. (Motion JPEG A,B and Quicktime/MPEG-4 are not very helpful in this context because they have a small color shift when reimported to After Effects.)
    Formats that do not allow to assign a color profile include Quicktime/PhotoJPEG, Quicktime/H264, H264 main concept, DVCPRO HD 1080p30, F4V. (Here, H264 main concept has anyway the disadvantage that it has a color shift when reimported into After Effects.)
    In After Effects CS4 it was possible to assign a color profile to Quicktime/H264, Quicktime/PhotoJPEG, DVCPRO HD 1080p30, but in CS5 this is no longer possible.
    Those video formats that do not allow to assign a color profile automatically are interpreted as having the color profile HDTV (Rec. 709) Y'CbCr in case that the videos have 1920x1080 format; similar applies to PAL formats which get SDTV (Rec. 709) Y'CbCr color profile.
    (I did not find anything of this automatic assignment to HDTV or SDTV color profile in the "interpretation rules.txt" file, therefore it must be written into the programme itself.)
    With growing popularity of wide gamut monitors it becomes necessary to produce footage and other videos that have a color profile different from HDTV or sRGB. When such footage is reimported to After Effects it has the wrong color and the only workarounds are either to use (in After Effects) the effect "Color profile converter" which necessitates extra render time or to use somewhat unpopular formats, like JPEG2000 that has very large filesize.
    Presently many footage is produced in Quicktime/PhotoJPEG and therefore it would be very desirable to allow to assign a color profile to such footage in the color management tab of the "Interpret Footage" dialog box.
    Does anyone know why in AE CS5 the video formats Quicktime/PhotoJPEG and Quicktime/H264 do not allow to have an arbitrary color profile assigned (although it was possible in CS4), is it a bug, or does it have a deeper reason.
    In this context I have a related question, often I read that Quicktime videos have a gamma tag. Does this mean that part of the color profile (the gamma value) is actually embedded/remembered, like you have it for images where the gamma is part the embedded color profile.
    I use AE CS5 on Mac Pro 2009 with OS 10.6.7.
    Thanks,
    Volker

    Thank you Rick for this interesting explanations and the links to articles.
    In the past few days I performed a few tests in After Effects and it is interesting that you mention that cameras, like the Sony EX3, allow videos to have embedded color profiles. I am not working myself with cameras but either get footage from the internet or sometimes videos from our video department which produces videos with professional SONY cameras, usually I get them in a matrox mxf format.
    As far as my test with After Effects show it is not possible to embed color profiles in the videos rendered with After Effects. Independent of the color profile in the working space and independent from the color profile in the output module I always get the same reaction if I reimport videos rendered by After Effects back to After Effects:
    In AE CS5 videos made in the formats Quicktime/PhotoJPEG, Quicktime/H264, H264 main concept, DVCPRO HD 1080p30, F4V  are always interpreted as color profile SDTV/HDTV (Rec. 709) Y'CbCr (even if I made them in other color profiles, such as Adobe RGB, Photo RGB, sRGB); and there is no possibility to change this interpretation rule.
    In contrast videos made in the formats Quicktime/JPEG2000, Quicktime/Motion JPEG A, Quicktime/Motion JPEG B, Quicktime/MPEG-4, Quicktime/Animation are always interpreted as sRGB (even if if I made them in other color profiles, such as Adobe RGB, Photo RGB, HDTV); only this time I can change the interpretation rule. Therefore if I know for example that if I had selected Photo RGB in the Output module I can change after the reimport the interpretation rule from sRGB to Photo RGB and only then I get again the original colors.
    The only exceptions are picture sequences, such as tiff-sequences, where the original color profile is automatically selected in the interpretation of the footage.
    Therefore, unfortunately for videos produced by After Effects your advice "If it says something like sRGB and you can change it, in most cases you shouldn't change it because the guess is probably right. If there is no color profile assigned then you should assume that is correct." is not so easy to be applied. You have to know how you did it originally in the Output module and hope that you can change it to the proper color profile, in case that the original color profile in the Output module was different from sRGB and HDTV/SDTV. But it is interesting to hear from you that with cameras there seem to be more possibilities.
    For this reason it would be nice if in future versions of After Effects one could change the color profile in the the color management tab of the "Interpret Footage" dialog box also for formats such as Quicktime/PhotoJPEG, Quicktime/H264, H264 main concept, DVCPRO HD 1080p30, F4V.
    Of course one can always circumvent shortcomings by using tiff-sequences, QT/jpeg2000, or QT/Animation as formats for storing, which is anyway better for lossless or nearly lossless storing, but the files are then too large and also cannot be played easily with a player.
    Volker

  • Captivate 3 support for Open Document format?

    Hi,
    Does anyone know about support for Open Document Format in Captivate 3? (OpenOffice presentations)
    Is it possible to save OpenOffice presentation in open document format or does it have to be saved as microsoft power point file?
    What about Captivate 4? Any improvement?

    On the OpenOffice.org site, look under projects, and there's an Open Document Toolkit for Java. I've no idea of its status though.

  • A video codec or support for a compressed format (ZEN

    i was wondering if creative could include support for some form of compressed video format in the next firmware release for the Creative Zen V Plus. i ask this as the supplied video converter uses incredibly large amounts of space even for a small video file since the avi is uncompressed (afaik)
    could support possibly be added for wmv or something as that is relati'vely small and it would be great if the player could support it.
    please reply as this is a very common 'issue' for most owners of this mp3 player.

    PSE 4 does do 16 bit - although there are a limited number of things you can do at that depth.
    It has essentially no support for actions.

  • Support for RAW Video and Image Sequences

    Being a stills photographer who moved into video some years back, I'm very interested in the direction Lightroom is going with regards to video support. I haven't tried it yet but I wondered if LR4 supports Red R3D files? And would it perhaps support other future RAW video formats from the likes of Canon and Sony? It would seem like the perfect application, perhaps intergrating with Premiere in a similar way to RedCine with FCP. Be great to be able to log footage, orginize it into bins and do basic colour correction in LR, edit the project in Premiere and re-touch in After Effects.
    Another task LR would seem ideally suited to is combining image sequences into timelapse video. Shooting timelapse as an image sequence on a DSLR is pretty much standard practice these days; and I've used LR to colour correct, crop and scale my sequences (before fitting them together in Quicktime) for years now. It would be fantastic to be able to preview the clip and export the video (as DPX, ProRes or DNxHD) from within Lightroom.
    These are obviously fairly long term wishes. In the short term though, the video features are pretty much useless to me without support for exporting ProRes and DNxHD files. With this LR becomes a powerful asset manager that could be used to collect together footage from multiple sources/codecs and transcode it all for editing. As mentioned in a previous thred, XML support would make it even more useful in this context. There is definitly a gap in the market for an application than can handle this kind of task well.
    With other manufactures floundering or neglecting their professional user base, Adobe would seem poised to take the video post crown. I wonder if Lightroom could be part of the takeover?

    As I understand it Andy, its intention is to remain a photographers program, not a videographers program.  The basic video features are available for lightweight management of videos coming from digital cameras, but it's not going too much further than that at this point in time.  Of course that may change in the future, but we'll all have to wait and see on that one.

  • No QuickTime support for playing video?

    I have an iPhone 3G and a iPhone 3GS, I might just have never noticed it before but I recently tried to play a .mov file on my server via an HTML file (that plays on my PC and Mac) through iPhone's Safari with no sucess. I find it rather interesting given the 3GS capability to record Video and the iPhone being able to play video from Itunes and Youtube that it doesn't seem to support Apple's native Quicktime format to play .mov files from the internet.
    Am I doing something wrong or missing something? I have 3.0 OS on both phones.

    The iPhone includes QuickTime support - you can watch videos via Apple's website and other websites with video provided via QT, but the video must be in the proper format for the iPhone. YouTube converted all YouTube video for the iPhone's YouTube app in QuickTime format or in a video format that is supported with the iPhone via QT.
    Copied from this link.
    http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html
    Video formats supported: H.264 video, up to 1.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Low-Complexity version of the H.264 Baseline Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats; H.264 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Baseline Profile up to Level 3.0 with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats; MPEG-4 video, up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Simple Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats

  • 10.10.3 breaks support for ATI video cards

    The 10.10.3 update has broken support for a bunch of ATI video cards that worked just fine under 10.10.2. This is for my Mac Pro 5,1. Some folks also reported issues with breaking support for Nvidia cards, but have mentioned that the latest Nvidia beta drivers might work.
    There is a thread that may be found here that has some details:
    OS X 10.10.3 Update
    and here (reverting back to 10.10.2 fixes things):
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1864352
    Specifically, my Visiontek Eyefinity 6 7750 stopped working, and another users Radeon 7770 stopped working.  Yet, the 7970 continues to work.  Reverting to the old ATI 5770 that came with the machine renders it usable. This is a problem as the 7750 only took a single slot, and the two 5770s eat up 3 slots so I can't use my USB 3 card, etc.
    I remember this once happened before.  I think it was with the 10.9.2 update which borked a bunch of video cards that worked fine under 10.9.1, and then were again made to work just fine with the 10.9.3 update.
    All the 'standard' fixes have been attempted.  Clean installs.  Fix permissions. Etc.
    Not sure why apple would seemingly disable support for these cards, other than by accident, I assume, much like happened with the 10.9.2 update.
    Also not sure if just copying the correct driver from 10.10.2 might solve the problem until Apple get's around to fixing the issue.  Has anyone tried?  Any suggestions would be appreciated.  Thanks!

    Hi, i am using dual Cinema Display 30 and 23 with a HIS ATI 7750 1 GB on a Mac Pro 3.1. Post upgrade from 10.10.2 to 10.10.3 my display eded unusable blurry. Therefore I have tried to replace the 10.10.3 kext with the previous 10.10.2. But it did not work out as expected. I managed to get some video output but no acceleration at all. Therefore the system is unusable. Therefore i full downgraded to 10.10.2 now.
    Never the less it might be a good starting point for someone to get acceleration running. This is what I did:
    I have to set the nvram variable kext-dev-mode=1, but be warned this will allow any unsigned > .kext to load, including rootlets, malware, etc.
    I did this in order to allow me to modify the kext if necessary and to ensure that if 10.10.2 kext might be locked that they still be loaded and the computer will not be prevented from boot.
    sudo nvram boot-args="kext-dev-mode=1"
    sudo shutdown -r now
    Post this i copied from my other Mac running 10.10.2 the file /System/Library/Extensions/AMDRadeonX4000.kext to my Mac Pro 3.1 running 10.10.3 with no proper video output. Basically i copied all ATI related kext from one mac to the other.
    copied  [MAC10.10.2]/System/Library/Extensions/ATI* ----> [MAC10.10.3]/System/Library/Extensions/ATI*
    copied  [MAC10.10.2]/System/Library/Extensions/AMD* ----> [MAC10.10.3]/System/Library/Extensions/AMD*
    someone needs to do a diff here to identify the file with is necessary the only one i found with a significant change seems to be AMDRadeonX4000.kext
    I forced to rebuild kext cache manually
    sudo touch /System/Library/Extensions
    sudo kextcache -m /System/Library/Caches/com.apple.kext.caches/Startup/Extensions.mkext /System/Library/Extensions
    And reboot!
    sudo shutdown -r now
    After the reboot I had  display output but no acceleration at all. Seeing the video out put made me happy but the system is unusable to to the lack of acceleration of the display. I am really looking forward for Apple to fix the update and to reapply support for the ATI GPUs hence it allows to save environmental resources to keep good products like the Mac Pro 3.1 running...

  • No support for avi video files in symbian belle

    well, the os is super impressive and the video player too.. But there is a problem while playing avi files. There is no preinstalled support for this type of file. While mp4 works fine without any problems. (i'm talking about nokia 600,603,700,701,n8,,etc)

    Yeah, there are some issues for some codecs. But you should be fine for aac/xvid files. I can run them without any problem. Also i can run .mkv files.
    THANK YOU
    If this post was useful, click the white star.
    Nokia 808 with Belle FP2 (113.010.1506)
    Type RM-807
    Product code 059p7z2

  • Aperture support for unsupported raw formats

    I was doing some tests with Aperture to see if it could fit my workflow. My concern was support of old files from a Nikon Coolpix 5400, raw (thanks to firmware update at the time) as well as a recent Nikon DSLR. No problem with the DSLR. 5400 was not supported. After some internet research I found out there is a pref file (Raw.plist in /System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/ ImageIO.framework/Versions/A/Resources) that has info about all supported cameras. This add raw support for the cameras listed in the file for Preview, iPhoto, Aperture (system-wide). Same list that Apple provides as camera compatibility list.
    In that list I chose to duplicate the NIKON-E8400 array and renamed it NIKON-E5400. Didn't change any value in the array. To my surprise, even without rebooting, this added support for the Nikon Coolpix 5400 images. The image looks pretty much the same with these default settings (when opened in Preview for example) than it does in ACR in CS2. The only odd difference is the image size loosing 10 vertical pixels (from 2592x1944 opened in ACR CS2 to 2592x1934). I have no idea why it does this but it is no big deal really as it is no scaling, just loss of pixels.
    I am a bit concerned of course about the possibility to carry on this tweak in the next OS updates.
    I guess any raw from any camera could have support this way.
    Just need to name the array in Raw.plist properly. For mine I just opened a raw in text edit and saw first line the name of camera, was "NIKONE5400". I compared the format of this name to other names in the array and decided to add the "-" to look like others so "NIKON-E5400", and that was it. Now I was lucky the default setting for the 8400 I used as a base worked for the 5400, apparently. It could have not been the case and then I would have had to play with the values in the array. Quite a few so a long process I am afraid, but possible.
    The deal would be to release a little utility software that would let us play with these values easily and see a result live on a sample image, and once satisfied it would modify this Raw.plist file. This way people could add support to their own raws.
    If anyone in the know sees a big issue in doing what I did please tell.
    Of course playing with this Raw.plist file is at your own risks so keep backup and bee careful.
    The tweaking of this raw.plist file had been talked about in different forum in the past concerning the support of Canon 3xxD that had a different US name Rebel something. The change of name of the corresponding array added support before an OS update did it for everyone.

    I also modified my Raw.plist file to import RAW files from my Olympus C-5050Z. But that doesn't make Aperture import a type of RAW file it didn't support before. It just turns out that your Nikon 5400 RAW files are the same format as the Nikon 8400 files except for size, just as my Olympus C-5050 files are substantially similar to the Olympus C-7070 files. I think the Raw.plist file used by ImageIO contains hints on how to treat the data and color in the images and as long as the cameras don't behave too differently, substituting one model with another will work.
    The RAW.plist file is a standard plist file that can be examined and modified with the Property List Editor. What I would like to see is documentation of the parameters so that we can more easily add support for cameras that aren't supported out of the box.
    MacBook Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   2.16GHz 2GB RAM 256VRAM

  • ICloud support for .pdf file format

    Help mentions iCloud supports .pdf file formats, but then does not show anything about how to get one of these files onto iCloud.  Since the pdf files I have were never created by one of the supported Application how does one place or retrieve a pdf file to/from iCloud?
    Thanks

    PSE 4 does do 16 bit - although there are a limited number of things you can do at that depth.
    It has essentially no support for actions.

  • Support for FITS file format

    Hi,
    I'm thinking about upgrading to 4.0 (from 2.0) but was wondering if anyone could tell me if 4.0 has support for 16 bit color depth? I generally use elements to do post-processing of astro images. These images are in fits format and there is a free plug in available for them but they require 16 bit depth. The maker of the plug-in makes no mention of 4.0 but says it works in 3.0. Here is a link to the plug-in:
    http://www.spacetelescope.org/projects/fits_liberator/index.html
    Here is partial requirements they list on their site:
    # Photoshop CS2 (best), or
    # Photoshop CS (16 bit colour)
    # Photoshop Elements 3.0 (partly 16 bit colour), or
    # Photoshop 7.0 (only 15 bit colour, and only partial functionality for more than 8 bit colour)
    # Photoshop Elements 2 (only 8 bit colour) (Elements 1.0 NOT supported)
    Also does 4.0 have support for actions like Photoshop cs? I'm on limited budget so I prefer not to upgrade to PS CS2 if I don't have to.
    TIA,
    Fred

    PSE 4 does do 16 bit - although there are a limited number of things you can do at that depth.
    It has essentially no support for actions.

  • How to extend interMedia to support for new Image Format

    Does anyone here has experience to extend interMedia to provide support for a new image format.
    I have read the related chapter in Oracle Intermedia User Guide, I'm not very clear about it. Hope a step-by-step tutorial for this topic is available.
    Thanks in advance for any idea

    Can you send the details of your application to [email protected] and explain the reasons extensibility is needed by your application?
    At this time, the only way to extend formats is to write your own procedures (ususally java stored procedures) to populate the image object... This does not extend the image processesing functionality to the new image format. Internally, this requires a translation to and from an intermediate format.
    Larry

  • Skype Update Broke Support For USB Video Capture D...

    We use video to USB adapters to integrate Skype into our classroom set ups and the most recent upgrade seems to have broken support for these types of devices. The only solution we've come up with so far is to downgrade to 6.1.0.129 and turn off auto updates (which is a band-aid at best). Any idea why Skype chose to do this and what might be the best way around the issue? The issue is with everything from cheap StarTech USB dongles all the way up to Black Magic Design's Intensity Shuttle. Our class capture cameras do not support USB unfortunately. 

    I believe at least starting with 6.2 the video support was being reworked in one way or another, possibly from the ground up.  It appears a lot of compatibility especially with virtual video devices/overlays was lost.  I don't believe that was intentional. The only thing you can do is continue to use 6.1 until a future release restores compatibility.

  • Does iMovie support Sony MicroMV video format?

    Hi, there
    I have one Sony MicroMV HandyCam (Model No. DCR-IP55E) and try to use iMovie to import the video from it. iMovie can recognize this machine (It shows the correct name and format for it!). But it can not import the video. As iMovie only recognize DV or mepg-4 format, what should I do now? Please kindly advice.
    Thanks,
    David

    Sony videocams are very popular in the market and
    this videocam is very compact and with many
    attractive features, like bluetooth and internet
    access.
    I've been covering the photo industry as a journalist for over 14 years and frequently deal with Sony. I never said they don't make some good products, but that they always do things their own way and have NEVER made much of an effort to support the Mac community.
    It is very sad that as a new Mac user, it
    seems like I have to use the PC to import the clips
    and then use Mac to do the editing. So is it possible
    that Mac new Operating system will provide certain
    software or driver for SONY MicroMV videocam in the
    near future?
    I certainly doubt it based on past experience. BTW, it's up to Sony to supply the necessary drivers to make things work on a Mac (or some third party) - Apple doesn't do this. Since Sony sells PC format computers, they don't seem to have any reason to do so.
    I suppose you could buy a new Intel Mac and also install Windows - then you could use the Sony supplied software to get the video into your computer.
    There are plenty of great camera choices that DO work with the Mac.
    F Shippey

Maybe you are looking for