Support for higher resolution on iPad?

I realise the latest 1.2 release increased the maximum resolution supported to 2048x2048 at the expense of the number of layers supported.
Are there any plans to extend this further, even if it only means supported say 4 layers? Most of my image editing apps (iPhoto, FilterStorm, Photogene etc.) can support my Nikon 12.2MP images without reduction and output at the full size so it seems this is still a limitation with Photoshop Touch which can only support a 3rd of this resolution.

AndyWhiteford wrote:
I'm fine with how Adobe hace approached this. My point is I have managed to edit full 12MP images on the iPad in these other apps and output at full size without any issues at all. I appreciate the image size will have a direct impact on the layers supported due to the limitations of available RAM but even if they limited it to 2 layers, you would at least have the choice of being able to edit these images in Photoshop Touch. Even if they disabled layers entirely for large images, it would still be a benefit being able to use this application to edit images as opposed to switching to different apps depending on the task at hand.
The point I'm trying to hammer home to anyone reading this is to realize the limitations tablets currently have. Sure, you might be OK with being only to edit a few layers when using a higher resolution but are others? Do they even know their tablets' specs? (I bet most don't even know the memory capacity their tablets have.)

Similar Messages

  • Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?

    Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?
    Photoshop CC, Illustrator CC and Indesign CC have 200% scaling for high resolution monitors in their preferences panel but Bridge CC does not, when will this feature be added to Bridge CC Adobe???

    qsea wrote:
    Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?
    Photoshop CC, Illustrator CC and Indesign CC have 200% scaling…
    Inconsistency between or among applications in the artificial "suites" should come as no surprise.
    The "suite" concept is a fabrication of Adobe marketing and bean-counting types.  The engineering teams are totally independent of each other, they are not only in different buildings but in different cities and states of the American Union, even in different countries.
    The fact that they have little if any communication among them is highlighted by requests occasionally made in these forums by top Adobe engineers to let the other teams know when there are problems in one application that impact our workflow in another one.

  • Panel not resizing for high-resolution monitors

    Received this in an email from a person using an HTML5 panel:  "What I'm seeing on a high resolution monitor (3840x2160) is that the panel doesn't resize to fit its container."
    The container for the panel is appears to have scaled up, but the panel itself is tiny within this container.
    The pixel dimensions on which the panel was built (and what's coded into the HTML for the panel) makes the panel the correct size on "normal" monitors, but it doesn't appear to up rez for high-resolution monitors.  The user can scale the rest of Photoshop's menus and panels using some interface in the OS, but the panel doesn't scale.
    Anyone have any thoughts on this weather or not it's possible to get panels to up-rez for high-resolution monitors?
    Thanks.

    qsea wrote:
    Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?
    Photoshop CC, Illustrator CC and Indesign CC have 200% scaling…
    Inconsistency between or among applications in the artificial "suites" should come as no surprise.
    The "suite" concept is a fabrication of Adobe marketing and bean-counting types.  The engineering teams are totally independent of each other, they are not only in different buildings but in different cities and states of the American Union, even in different countries.
    The fact that they have little if any communication among them is highlighted by requests occasionally made in these forums by top Adobe engineers to let the other teams know when there are problems in one application that impact our workflow in another one.

  • Make Skype work properly with Windows DPI scaling for high resolution displays

    Hello, As of now, Skype does not work well with Windows DPI scaling. Everything looks fuzzy (fonts, icons, etc).Microsoft's recommendation is to turn off the DPI scaling ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2900023 ) but in this case, the text is too tiny to be read. Basically everyone with a high resolution display is stuck with either tiny of fuzzy fonts, making Skype unusable. It's really a pity because other Microsoft programs such as Office work perfectly with Windows DPI scaling, and Skype also looks great on Mac with Retina display. With high DPI displays becoming more and more common, this is a must have feature. Thanks for reading!

    pokegwa wrote:
    Hello, As of now, Skype does not work well with Windows DPI scaling. Everything looks fuzzy (fonts, icons, etc).Microsoft's recommendation is to turn off the DPI scaling ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2900023 ) but in this case, the text is too tiny to be read. Basically everyone with a high resolution display is stuck with either tiny of fuzzy fonts, making Skype unusable. It's really a pity because other Microsoft programs such as Office work perfectly with Windows DPI scaling, and Skype also looks great on Mac with Retina display. With high DPI displays becoming more and more common, this is a must have feature. Thanks for reading!It's been two years actually. As you can see Skype is really broken on HDPI displays and the issue is still being ignored/unacknowledged by Skype devs.

  • Support for High-DPI screens Windows

    This was posted two months ago by someone else, but I feel that it is too important to be ignored. I have a QHD resolution Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro laptop, and I use Spotify almost constantly. However, I almost never use the desktop app; with DPI scaling, the scaling is fine, but the resolution is horrrible. With my display, I would hope for 1080p resolution (at least), but apparently it will never happen. My question is: is it possible for the Spotify developers to create a Windows program with high DPI support? Or maybe a Windows 8 app? Pretty please?

    Hi there,
    I guess you are talking about this idea, I do agree that this idea is very important.
    As soon as an idea reaches 100 kudos it will reach the spotify team and they will change the status. To learn more about the processing of ideas read this post "How your feedback reaches Spotify"
    If would suggest to add your kudos and support in that idea, and keep sharing it on sites like Facebook, Twitter...
     

  • Aperture has not been updated to support new higher-resolution Facebook images

    In August facebook changed the maximum dimensions of a photo from 720x720 to 960x960 (http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=10150262684247131). Much like the last time they upped the resolution of photos on Facebook, Aperture didn't get updated to accomodate this change for months. As I understand this isn't some long gradual rollout -- all FB users can now use 960x960 images, and seeing as this is probably like one line of code to change, I'm just wondering if we'll be waiting months and months again to take advantage of this. In the meantime there's little reason to create FB albums through Aperture since you're forced to use lower resolution images.
    Anyone know how to perhaps modify Aperture to make this change while we wait for a proper update?

    Totally understand your first point. Some photographers want to protect their work. Thing is, some don't. It's just a hobby for me and I know I won't be making any money on it. People like me just want to put up the best version of a picture FB will allow us to. Perhaps Aperture should allow the user to CHOOSE the resolution of the image that gets uploaded.
    Facebook has, for the past while (long before the 960x960 change in August) allowed users to "download" the image, typically at a much higher resolution than what is displayed. The difference is that up until August, images viewed on facebook only displayed at 700x700. Now that's been upped to 960x960.
    Upon some re-testing I do have to eat my own foot. I just created a new FB album through Aperture and they are showing up as 960's instead of 700's. However all my older albums still show the images at 700x700 (something FB said would change automatically, since they technically already have much larger versions of these photos to resample to 960x960). It seems you have to force an update by editing the image so it gets reuploaded.
    So in conclusion, foot has been inserted into mouth.... though it'd be nice if I could simply "re-sync" my older albums to have them display at 960 without having to fool aperture into reuploading the whole thing....

  • Increase After Effects System text for high resolution monitor

    I just purchased a high resolution monitor.  The panels and system text (rendering queue, project panel, etc.) in After Effects is now just about microscopic.
    Is there anyway to adjust the default text size on all the panels?

    No, unfortunately not. This stuff is part of Adobe's specific UI libraries and cannot be changed. The main application menu should respect your settings though, as should file dialogs and a few text input fields, if that's any consolation. If possible, simply define a user preset in your graphics card settings that switches screeen resolution and system dpi when launching AE or any other Adobe app. Good monitors have good scaling chips, so it should not look all too shabby and you can always go back full res for pixel precision when needed...
    Mylenium

  • Dropped support for high-def dvd?

    Does anyone know if Mavericks dropped support for the HD DVD format offered by Compressor 3?
    A DVD authored with this format will not play on an iMac (2.4 Intel Core 2 Duo) running Mavericks, but will play on a Mac Pro (2x2Ghz Dual-Core Intel Xeon) running Mac OS 10.6.8. Other DVDs play fine on the iMac.
    Thanks in advance for any information regarding this.

    The CalDigit card is not rated to work on the NEWEST MacPros...the ones with different processors and other internal circuitry. It works fine on previous models. The big reason I suggest the Caldigit card over the rest is:
    1) It is half the price with all the same features
    2) It can be installed and removed by the customer. The Apple card can only be installed and removed by a certified Apple dealer.
    Now, Raid 5 is good as it offers PROTECTION...where RAID 0 does not. If one drive dies, the RAID 5 still works. If the same happened to Raid 0, all info is lost...ALL. Raid 5 will lower the capacity of all the drives, as it uses one for this protection, where Raid 0 is larger. Give and take.
    FYI...I cut DVCPRO HD and ProRes on internal drives...no raid. Firewire 800 drives are good for this format too. Raids are only needed for multiple streams of ProRes, and the uncompressed formats. And for protection.
    Shane

  • Performance Lag for higher resolution

    I have developed a touch based flash application with a resolution of 5120x1440.
    There is performance lag in two areas.
    1) FPS is low (below 33) and Graphic lag is high (sometimes hitting > 80 ms)
    2) Touch response is slow (using touchlib)
    I'm using a PC of the following specs.
    CPU: Intel i7-4770 3.4GHz
    RAM: Kingston 8GB
    Motherboard: Gigabyte Z87X-OC
    GPU: 4x Gigabyte Geforce GT630 2GB
    PSU: 1000W
    Currently, the GPU Load is hitting at most 20% and the CPU usage is most of time below 50%. If I keep invoking the touch events, the app will ocassionally freeze and GPU Load drops to 0% for a while before coming back to normal and app becomes responsive again.
    Is there a hardware compatilbility issue? Is there any way to improve on the touch responsiveness?
    Thanks...

    If the computer recognized the three monitors as three
    monitors, and not one really wide monitor, then you could run three
    full screen flash programs at the same time, one on each screen,
    also syncing them with localConnection. It could be pretty easy to
    sync content if you created a movie clip to hold all your animation
    (the movie clip can be 4080 px wide) and then animated everything
    so that a very wide clip had the entire animation. Then use a stage
    with a width of 1360 and move this clip to x positions 0, -1360,
    and -2720, each time saving the movie and publishing. If you have
    one that sends localConnection cues to the others, then it should
    be able to sync things up.
    This is much easier said than done of course, as I dunno what
    kind of content you're running, audio, video, etc. Plus, I think
    you're dealing with a situation where you have a computer that sees
    one big screen and not 3 smaller ones, so the second solution might
    not work.
    You could try a similar thing and drop all of them in a
    Director shell, which will do 4080 pixels wide, and use the same
    technique, but that could be a big performance hit, and it adds
    another (expensive) pieces of software.

  • Support for 1920x1080 resolution for external MacBook screen?

    Got a MacBook 2Ghz (white model) with smashed LCD. For the time being, I use a 19" LCD as main screen with not-too-got result via the MiniDVI-VGA adaptor. I understand that using DVI all the way will give more options regarding external screen resolutions, so I wonder: Will a 1920x1080 FullHD screen be supported correctly when using the MiniDVI-DVI adaptor from this MacBook model (that unfortunately lacks a separate graphics card....)?
    In advance - thank you.

    I doubt it.
    my x3100 machine only supports up to 1280x800. And HD monitors wernt standard kit when the 950 was around. Id say Find a larger monitor or Find out the optimal resolution of the monitor you are using and set it to that.
    Start at 1024x768, if that does not look right try going down or up untill it looks better.

  • Frustration with lack of support for Flash Player on IPad. When is Apple going to support Flash?

    When is Apple going to support Flash Player on IPad? 
    The majority of sites that have multimedia content rely on Flash. Safari users are missing out on tons and tons of content that depends on Flash.  I have and love my IPad 2. I should be able to use this awesome thing to get at anything I need to on the Internet. Yet when I need to access Flash sites, I am forced back to my windows PC.
    Please Apple Make it happen! I'm tired of being ragged by android users on this. You need to fix it.

    xx66stangxx wrote:
    Flash is a dieing technology.
    Really it's not seeming that way.
    In fact, since the iPad release, and Steve Jobs famously declairing the death of Flash, Flash useage has increased.
    Check it out 95.75% of all internet connected devices have the Flash Player.
    http://www.statowl.com/flash.php
    (the mac only has 12% share, it must be totally doomed then)
    IOS Apps are now made using Adobe Flash
    http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/09/09/the-best-selling-ipad-app-on-the-app-stor e-was-created-with-adobe-flash/
    And so are Android, Blackberry etc.
    And HTML5 was supposed to be Apple's answer to all the missing content, yet here, 3 years later, HTML5 is no where to be seen, and lacks support/performance to compete with Flash.
    http://getmoai.com/images/banners/mobilegaming-html5-vs-alternatives-011112-moai .jpg
    Just look at how when you step outside the reality distortion field, things look much different. Look at HTML5 performance compared to Flash.... wasn't HTML5 supposed to outperform and save us from dead batteries? Well even 3 years after Steve Jobs claims it's still using 5x more resources than Flash.
    This demo shows 16,250 sprites animating at 60fps using the Flash player, something HTML5 can't even do with less than 100 sprites.
    http://www.bytearray.org/?p=4074
    HTML5 is a joke, Flash is real, and is providing real content to real people right now. If you as an Apple owner believe the ownership of an IOS device is worth this loss, then more power to you.

  • QuickTime SDK for Windows ICMCompressionSessionEncodeFrame crashes for higher resolution cameras  2 MP

    I implemented a while ago a H.264 re-encoding to output H.264 QuickTime .mov file usng QuickTime Window SDK  7.3.0.70. The code uses ICMCompressionSession to compress the frames going into the container. The code works fine with cameras with resolutions up to 2 Megapixels (1600 x 1200). The crash occurs in QuickTime API call. Here is the code to compress the frame:
    CVPixelBufferRef pixel_buffer = nil;
    int nWidth = (**pixMap).bounds.right - (**pixMap).bounds.left;
    int nHeight = (**pixMap).bounds.bottom - (**pixMap).bounds.top;
    CVReturn ret =
    CVPixelBufferCreateWithBytes(kCFAllocatorDefault,
                                 nWidth,
                                 nHeight,
                                 k24RGBPixelFormat,
                                 GetPixBaseAddr(pixMap),
                                 3 * nWidth,
                                 NULL,
                                 NULL,
                                 NULL,
                                 &pixel_buffer);
    //.....code ommitted for clarity
    // set image data into the pixel buffer
    CVPixelBufferLockBaseAddress( pixel_buffer, 0 );
    // Feed the frame to the compression session.
    m_OSerr = ICMCompressionSessionEncodeFrame( compressionSession, pixel_buffer,
            displayTimeMsecs, displayDurationMsecs, validTimeFlags,
            frameOptions, NULL, NULL );
    //unlock the pixels
    CVPixelBufferUnlockBaseAddress( pixel_buffer, 0 );
    CVPixelBufferRelease(pixel_buffer);
    The call to ICMCompressionSessionEncodeFrame fails either  with
    1. Error code -108
    memFullErr = -108, /*Not enough room in heap zone*/
    OR
    2. An access violation QuickTimeH264.qtx!6782522d()
    [Frames below may be incorrect and/or missing, no symbols loaded for QuickTimeH264.qtx]
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!6782529a()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!676c7a13()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!6777467b()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!676ac709()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!6777abbe()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!6777ac1a()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!67698aa1()
    kernel32.dll!@BaseThreadInitThunk@12() + 0x12 bytes
    ntdll.dll!___RtlUserThreadStart@8() + 0x27 bytes
    ntdll.dll!__RtlUserThreadStart@8() + 0x1b bytes
    Has anyone encountered the same problem and if so what was the resolution?

    i suspect its a weak psu ,can you run any thing stresses the vga card under linux

  • Flash for higher resolution displays

    Newbie here (using CS3 Professional...just completed first
    basic tutorial). I've been searching Adobe documents and this
    forum, but haven't found an answer to my question. I'm wanting to
    use flash for a tradeshow digital signage application and I need my
    PC to output a flash movie at a resolution of 4080x768. An external
    Matrox card will divide that resolution over three LCD flat-panel
    displays. I learned that Flash's max stage size is 2880 pixels
    either horizontal or vertical. Any workarounds? or is this even
    do-able?
    Thanks!

    If the computer recognized the three monitors as three
    monitors, and not one really wide monitor, then you could run three
    full screen flash programs at the same time, one on each screen,
    also syncing them with localConnection. It could be pretty easy to
    sync content if you created a movie clip to hold all your animation
    (the movie clip can be 4080 px wide) and then animated everything
    so that a very wide clip had the entire animation. Then use a stage
    with a width of 1360 and move this clip to x positions 0, -1360,
    and -2720, each time saving the movie and publishing. If you have
    one that sends localConnection cues to the others, then it should
    be able to sync things up.
    This is much easier said than done of course, as I dunno what
    kind of content you're running, audio, video, etc. Plus, I think
    you're dealing with a situation where you have a computer that sees
    one big screen and not 3 smaller ones, so the second solution might
    not work.
    You could try a similar thing and drop all of them in a
    Director shell, which will do 4080 pixels wide, and use the same
    technique, but that could be a big performance hit, and it adds
    another (expensive) pieces of software.

  • Reconnecting for Higher Resolution

    Hi
    I'm working on a project in which the film has been scanned in as an Apple Pro Res file, 1920 x 1080
    I've edited the entire thing, thinking my settings were in HD, but it turns out I've edited the video as 720 x 480 (yeah I know, dumb thing not to notice)
    I've tried looking around at any tutorials for reconnecting media, hoping that it would read the HD file and make my edited timeline HD
    I've made a new timeline with HD settings, and copied my 720 timeline into that. The videos are now very small on the screen. I could always physically drag the video and make it bigger, but I'd be afraid if I exported that as 1080, it would drastically lose the quality.
    Is there anyone who can help with what I'm trying to do, and have FCP detect all the in/outs of the original 1080 file, and match them with the 720-video on my now-1080 timeline?
    I apologize if that got confusing at any point I feel like I repeated myself
    Message was edited by: Book1245

    HI -
    On the copy sequence you made, click on the timeline and type Command + A to select all your clips.
    Then control click on any one of the selected clips and from the drop down menu, select Remove Attributes. From the Remove Attributes window that opens select Basic Motion and Distort (if it is bold and clickable), then click OK.
    Your clips should now resize themselves to the correct size, if you have set the sequence settings correctly.
    Hope this helps.
    MtD
    Message was edited by: Meg The Dog to fix typo

  • Support for 4k monitors

    Apparently CS6 does not support 4k monitors; what can be done to enlarge the type in cs6 when using a 4k monitor? i'll be getting a new eizo
    tia
    steve

    It not so much a 4K monitor thing it is a high resolution display thing. There currently is no  support for high resolution monitors only an temp patch to run high resolution display as a low resolution display.
    Large 4k Displays are not high resolution display they still have a resolution in the same ball park as old desktop displays.
    IBM old 4k LCD t201 22.2"  3840x2400px 16:10 aspect ratio has a 204 DPI and the newer 24" 4k  3840x2160px  16:9 aspect ratio have a 185 DPI resolution Larger displays still have resolution near the old standard desktop display's 96 DPI  resolution.    Laptop and tablets can can have high resolution.
    High resolution displays have smaller pixels than low resolution display so things display smaller on high resolution text, icons and button display smaller so they are harder to see and touch.
    If you get a new large eizo 4k display you will have no problem for it will not have resolution that is that much greater than old desktop displays things will be somewhat smaller but not be a problem for they will be sharper and look better than on old desktop displays..
    149DPI is about the highest I see on their site
    CG318-4K 
    - 31.1"
    - 4096 x 2160 resolution
    - Dual DisplayPort, and HDMI
    - 149 ppi
    - Built-in calibration sensor

Maybe you are looking for