Support for Lumix DMC-GH1K

I just purchased a Lumix DMC-GH1K camera and have not been able to download the pictures into iPhoto. When I plug the camera in iPhoto starts and gives me thumbnail previews of the pictures but when I try to import them it says that it can not recognized the format (.RW2). Any ideas?

Download and try Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Macintosh. It's free and may work on those RAW files.

Similar Messages

  • RAW support for Lumix DMC LX2

    RAW support for Lumix DMC LX2--is this available? coming? Now that I have purchased Aperture and downloaded 1.5, am sad to find that I still must process RAW for my camera in Photoshop.
    Thoughts? Help?

    Did you try to first convert your RAW file into a DNG file (using Adobe DNG converter) and then import it in your Aperture library?
    I'm planning to buy an LX2 as an everyday camera, and I have the same issue.
    If you find a solution please tell me.

  • Please add support for Lumix DMC-LX1

    I've had this excellent camera for a few months and am frustrated I can't use its RAW files with Aperture.
    At least I can use it with Lightroom and Photoshop CS2, but I want to use Aperture. I sincerely hope cameras are added to Aperture at least as quickly as Adobe can add them.

    I doubt you will have much luck here. I wish support for my Konica Minolta A200 would be added but there is little hope now Konica Minolta have left the market.
    One of Apple's main shortcomings in this area is their lack of RAW support. This will probally lead Adobe to have the upper hand with RAW processing as they support 100s more cameras than Apple do!

  • Adobe DNG settings for Lumix DMC-LX1 workaround

    The question is for Pat Gilmore, who originally posted the workaround:
    Pat, I followed all your steps, but in Step 4 when I try to access the URL (where I will find out how to set the DNG preferences) I get this message:
    The requested URL /users/pat/galleries/tech/AptDNG/ApertureDNGDMCLX1.html does not exist.
    Can you provide any help with the preferenfces?
    Thanks from a frustrated owner of a Lumix DMC-LX1 (and Nikon 70)
    Susan

    I doubt you will have much luck here. I wish support for my Konica Minolta A200 would be added but there is little hope now Konica Minolta have left the market.
    One of Apple's main shortcomings in this area is their lack of RAW support. This will probally lead Adobe to have the upper hand with RAW processing as they support 100s more cameras than Apple do!

  • Aperture update 2.1.3 still no RAW support for Lumix G1

    Once again and after posting to Apple development we still have no RAW support for the Panasonic Lumix G1. How much longer Apple...!

    RAW support updates are separate from Aperture updates..
    Maybe with 10.5.7... or another RAW compatibility update sometime.. hopefuly soon.

  • RAW support for Panasonic DMC-FZ1000.

    My research indicated 5.2 supports the DMC-FZ100 for RAW.  I just purchased and installed upgrade to Lightroom 5.2 from 4.4 but it does not support the camera in RAW.  Non-support message is received when trying to import RAW files from the camera.
    Help?

    So, is it the FZ100  or FZ1000? The latter requires Lightroom 5.6 or newer. If you click on Help->Updates in Lightroom you will be guided to update to Lightroom 5.7.1. But when you start that version it will advise you that there is yet another upgrade. That would be to Lightroom CC/6. If you don't want to go that route right now just click on the ignore button in the lower left-hand corner of that notification.

  • CS4 raw support for Lumix LX5 RW2 files

    It appears that the new Camera Raw Adapter 6.2 that supports the new Lumix LX5 raw files is not compatible with Photoshop CS4.  Does this mean I will never be able to process LX5 raw files with CS4?

    Adobe provides backwards compatibility in CS2, CS3 and CS4 for new cameras through the FREE DNG Converter:
    Win: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4803
    Mac: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4802
    There are other benefits to using DNG besides backward compatibility if you haven’t explored those:
    The metadata, keywords and RAW adjustments are stored in the file – along with a processed preview of the image. This makes the file portable and keeps your metadata safe and secure.
    DNG files are smaller than the original RAW file which will save you disk space and time in the long run.
    DNG is an openly specified file format which means the file format isn’t going away. So if you use another RAW processor that supports DNG, you don’t have to worry about compatibility or portability of your metadata.

  • RAW support for Lumix GX1?

    When will Aperture start supporting RAW files from Panasonic Lumix GX1? Do I really have to switch to Lightroom?

    I think the Aperture RAW releases are consistently shoddy versus Adobe.  And Adobe is not a company people tend to hype.
    I've had a GX1 since before Christmas, and about 10 weeks later RAW suuport is still not available in Aperture while it has been in Adobe Camera Raw for some time.  Apple consistently drags the chain on getting RAW updates out. 
    No sense blaming the camera manufacturer.  It's unlikely they rush details to Adobe and sit back for a few months before letting Apple know.
    I paid about $250 for Aperture in Australia and soon after it was being sold for around $80.  Not a happy experience.  Now with Lightroom 4 floating around, I think I'll be switching soon.
    It's strange how Apple offers such a great customer experience and such excellent products across most of the company, while little niches like Aperture and Filemaker seem to so lag behind.

  • Missing Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 is a bug and you must help! Workaround!

    I've found out that Apple does a simple string check inside the RAW files and doesn't support the Lumix DMC-GF1, because it simply doesn't check for the name.
    If you open a RAW file from the DMC-GF1 you will immediately see the text
    PanasonicDMC-GF1
    close to the start of the file.
    If you change that to PanasonicDMC-GF1 Aperture 3 will then accept the RAW file and open it without a flaw. You can use the file it without a problem. But be aware: It doesn't work if you change it to PanasonicDMC-G1, though. I think that's because of the length of the text.
    Please go to the feedback page of Aperture 3 and send this as a BUG REPORT.
    I did this a few minutes ago and urge you to do the same. The more reports Apple gets the faster they will do something about this and it's easy for them to solve this problem.
    Message was edited by: Electonic
    Message was edited by: Electonic

    Sorry for the double post. My bad!
    Message was edited by: Electonic

  • Pse 13 support for camera raw 8.6

    Does pse 13 support camera raw 8.6 for  lumix dmc fz1000?

    Hi
    Thank you for posting to forums.
    Yes, it should support the lumix dmc fz1000.
    You can check the list of supported camera for Camera RAW plugin from the below link
    Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
    Thanks
    Parth Vyas

  • When is LR5 going to add support for the Lumix DMC-LX100?

    Is there a date for the release of LR support for the Lumix DMC-LX100?

    Anyone who knows is not allowed to say. And anyone who gives you a date doesn't know. Adobe doesn't make announcements about new versions in advance.

  • Oh no- new update and still no support for my panasonic lumix dmc-lx2-

    sorry, but i was writing several support-mails and hoped so much, that this new camera could be supported. no way.
    how can it be, that the »Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1« is supported, but the dmc-lx2 not? are the raws different?
    i don't get it…
    iMac 20'' Intel 2 Duo   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   Titanium 550, some iPods

    Read the slightly newer topic by Pat Gilmour "Lumix DMC-LX1 RAW......" and you can see it is feasible, if not convenient. Note that for the LX2 you have to follow the instructions for the LX1 but write LX2 instead. It works a beauty for me
    Al
    MBP Core 2 Duo 17''   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • Support for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ8

    Is Apple planning to support RAW for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ8 in Aperture? Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom provide support for this camera.
    Any ideas?

    Adobe releases regular update with new camera support. One ought to be along before too long.

  • RAW Support for Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5?

    When is the RAW Support for Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5 available?

    We don't know - only Apple will know that. This is a User-to-User forum.

  • Support for Panasonic Lumix DMC G3K

    I have recently bought the Panasonic Lumix DMC G3K and discovered that neither LR or CS5 will support the raw files. The irony is that LR is part of the package when you buy this camera before the end of Aug. When will Adobe support this camera?

    Adobe releases regular update with new camera support. One ought to be along before too long.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How Does The BEA WebLogic Face This Competition?

    Websphere application server 4.0 is claiming that it will be the ultimate application server and it soon 'll become the no.1 in the market because WebSphere Application Server, Version 4 Leverage your e-business with the foundation of the most rapidl

  • HOWTO: Install and use opensync-0.22 to sync Evolution to Nokia phone

    Opensync-0.3x is unstable and fraught with danger, the only relatively-safe version is opensync-0.22.  Installing opensync-0.22 is quite a task in x86-64 (i686 users might be able to use the unofficial kpiche repository on this page http://wiki.archl

  • Include Package parasitics in IBIS File Spartan6, TQG144

    Hi, want to generate an IBIS-File from my project within ISE 14.7, and it works, bot there is the following message inside the file: [Package] |WARNING:PostProcessors - IBIS [Package] Section data is not currently |available for tqg144. Please use Xi

  • Numbers crashes when loading budget template

    Numbers crashes every time I try to use the Budget template from the template chooser. I can open other templates just fine. Any ideas?

  • Loop auditions correctly but doesn't play correctly in Logic project

    I've found this particular loop, "Euro Move Synth 3" play correctly when I audition it but as soon as i drag it over into a project, the file will not play as auditioned. I've tried deleting the loop and reinstalling and creating new projects. Using