Support för Palomino core with OLD bios?

I have a question regarding MS-6380 compability
with the Palomino core with and old BIOS.
The problem is that my Tbird 1000MHz just burned up
and I haven't updated my BIOS at all, and now I in
pursuit of an new CPU. I dont remember what version it
is but I'm sure that its older than the 6380v15 that is
supposed to add support for "Palomin CPU support 1.5GHz -
1.7GHz".
So my questions are this,
will it work if I put in an AMD 1500+ or 1600+ cpu
(with the Palomoni core but no Higher clockspeed than
1400 Mhz)? Will it work long enough so I can update the
BIOS? Or will it not work at all?
In short will the Moderbord work at all with an Palomino
based CPU, even with a old BIOS (probably ver 1.0)?

Hi!
The XP1800+ will normally work at 1533 MHz, assuming a fsb of 133. If fsb is set to 100, the result will be 1533/1.33 = 1150MHz approximately.
Hans

Similar Messages

  • Disk greater 8GB with old BIOS

    I try to get a 40GB Western Digital WD Caviar 450AA work properly on the secondary IDE controller as a master drive. It should have the function as a data storage. I got the patch 110202-01 applied on my system, which should get disks greater than 8GB to work. It well has an effect on the system. I was able to fdisk the drive with a geometry file when the drive was set to LBA in the BIOS. Further I was able to partition the drive with the sol8 x86 native format tool - I set the 0 partition to 'usr' and got the whole disk size stuck in one partition. Thes disk was labeled, everything worked fine so far, but afterwards I was not able to build an UFS filesystem on the disk. Neither with 'newfs' nor with 'mkfs'.
    Has anyone an idea how to solve this problem?

    plenus wrote:1) It seems that I can't use a a regular partition larger than 2.2TB, so I will have to use GPT. Do I need (or is it recommended) to partition both disks with GPT? Does it work with non EFI BIOSes? Can I use a regular GRUB2 install?
    According to wikipedia, linux has no problem booting from GPT on BIOS, and accordind to archwiki, GRUB2 provides the ability to boot from GPT in both BIOS and UEFI based systems.. I dont think that formating both disk with GPT is necessary, but I am not sure.
    plenus wrote:2) What is the recommended way of installing arch using this set up? Do I install everything under the SSD and later move /var and /home to the HDD?
    I would install with this approach.
    plenus wrote:3) What is the best way to have the complete final root file system: using symlinks, bind mounts, or any other technique?
    In this setup (/var and /home on one big partition), I would use symlinks.
    plenus wrote:4) I deal with huge files and sometimes huge pictures and huge memory needs (Blender 3D, GIMP and Inkscape with huge files, radiosity rendering, etc). I've read that a swap partition is not needed nowadays. So I was thinking of creating just a swap file inside the HDD partition. Would it degrade too much the HDD performance or fragmentation? Could it be used for hibernation?
    This says Google about swap file/partition performance. You could use hibernation. I allways go with swap partition, but nowadays it is just proforma, because I have enough memory to never use swap.
    plenus wrote:5) Can I use the regular arch install procedure to accomplish all that or do i have to prepare anything before/after?
    I think (but I'm not sure, though) parted is on installation media.

  • [solved] How to install with old BIOS + 60GB SSD + 3TB HDD + fulldisk?

    I'm new to archlinux and this will be my first install. I use Debian and Kubuntu, but I'm no expert. I've read many archlinux docs (and they *are good*, congatulations), but I couldn't find specifics to what I want to do.
    My system is a desktop box (6GB RAM) that I use for video editing, compiling, browsing and many other unrelated things. What I plan to do is to organize things in the following way:
    SSD (60GB): first disk (for a fast boot up time) with only one partition, ext4
    / and everything, except for /home and /var
    HDD (3TB): second disk with only one partition, ext4
    Mounted as /something
    Symlinks (or bind mounts) to /var and /home
    My reason to use only one partition for / and one for /home and /var is to not have to worry about balancing partition sizes among system files, user files, web server files, etc.
    Could you please comment on the following:
    1) It seems that I can't use a a regular partition larger than 2.2TB, so I will have to use GPT. Do I need (or is it recommended) to partition both disks with GPT? Does it work with non EFI BIOSes? Can I use a regular GRUB2 install?
    2) What is the recommended way of installing arch using this set up? Do I install everything under the SSD and later move /var and /home to the HDD?
    3) What is the best way to have the complete final root file system: using symlinks, bind mounts, or any other technique?
    4) I deal with huge files and sometimes huge pictures and huge memory needs (Blender 3D, GIMP and Inkscape with huge files, radiosity rendering, etc). I've read that a swap partition is not needed nowadays. So I was thinking of creating just a swap file inside the HDD partition. Would it degrade too much the HDD performance or fragmentation? Could it be used for hibernation?
    5) Can I use the regular arch install procedure to accomplish all that or do i have to prepare anything before/after?
    6) Any other tips?
    Thanks
    Last edited by plenus (2012-04-21 02:49:47)

    plenus wrote:1) It seems that I can't use a a regular partition larger than 2.2TB, so I will have to use GPT. Do I need (or is it recommended) to partition both disks with GPT? Does it work with non EFI BIOSes? Can I use a regular GRUB2 install?
    According to wikipedia, linux has no problem booting from GPT on BIOS, and accordind to archwiki, GRUB2 provides the ability to boot from GPT in both BIOS and UEFI based systems.. I dont think that formating both disk with GPT is necessary, but I am not sure.
    plenus wrote:2) What is the recommended way of installing arch using this set up? Do I install everything under the SSD and later move /var and /home to the HDD?
    I would install with this approach.
    plenus wrote:3) What is the best way to have the complete final root file system: using symlinks, bind mounts, or any other technique?
    In this setup (/var and /home on one big partition), I would use symlinks.
    plenus wrote:4) I deal with huge files and sometimes huge pictures and huge memory needs (Blender 3D, GIMP and Inkscape with huge files, radiosity rendering, etc). I've read that a swap partition is not needed nowadays. So I was thinking of creating just a swap file inside the HDD partition. Would it degrade too much the HDD performance or fragmentation? Could it be used for hibernation?
    This says Google about swap file/partition performance. You could use hibernation. I allways go with swap partition, but nowadays it is just proforma, because I have enough memory to never use swap.
    plenus wrote:5) Can I use the regular arch install procedure to accomplish all that or do i have to prepare anything before/after?
    I think (but I'm not sure, though) parted is on installation media.

  • MSI Ge70 0nd-224Fr request old Bios

    Hi all,
    I have a problem with my MSI Ge70 0nd-224Fr Notebook.
    I have upgraded Bios from E1756IMS.511 to E1756IMS.514 and my graphic card GTX660M dosen't work correctly  .
    All was good with E1756IMS.511 Bios !
    So i want to rool back to E1756IMS.511 Bios.
    is anyone has this bios file because MSI website doesn't have link to old bios ?
    I will be very very happy is someone can help me.
    Best regards,

    Some games doesn't detect correctly Nvidia graphics card (I have try with 314.x  320.x nvidia driver [and with last beta 320.49] and i have selected game exe association with nvidia card but it was good with E1756IMS.511 but not with E1756IMS.513 and E1756IMS.514)
    example : i have bad shadows on mafia 2 bench (but with old bios it was good)
    and For example (my os is Windows 8) with Areo Glass mod from big muscle (it working with E1756IMS.511 bios but not with E1756IMS.513 and 514 ...)
    So for me, E1756IMS.511 is the best bios and the most "stable".
    I didn't want overclock my graphic card, i only want the most stable system (the last bios release has a very negative resut on my system  )
    I have read that the 514 Bios solved a bug with "incorrect detection nvidia graphic card frequency", so it was the only reason of why i have made an upgrade of my bios ...
    E1756IMS.514 Fixes:
    - Modify radio switch device only present in Windows 8.
    - Solve the problem of abnormal password window when first boot priority is IP4/IP6.
    - Solve the abnormal problem of resume from S4 after disable/enable Full Screen Logo Display.
    - Solve abnormal NVIDIA GPU frequency problem.
    So my result is with E1756IMS.514:
    - abnormal NVIDIA detection problem
    - Artefact on game
    Please, give me a link to original bios E1756IMS.511 and original EC.
    Thank you for advance for your help.

  • Booting from an USB stick with an old BIOS using a boot CD

    Hi
    I use larch to build a customized live-usb system, and I'm pretty happy with it.
    The problem is that I can't boot it on some old computers, with a BIOS that :
    Doesn't support booting from USB devices
    Doesn't support accessing USB devices
    This mean, that, when using a CD with GRUB, the USB stick cannot be seen by GRUB.
    That issue is discussed in the Ubuntu help : https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BootFromUSB
    As you can see, I have problem #2, so my option is to use Linux USB drivers to boot from the stick.
    kernel /boot/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true persistent
    The only problem is that, this seems to be Ubuntu-specific, and I don't know how to do that in Arch Linux : do I need a custom kernel or something ?
    I tried searching for "cdrom-detect" in the Linux Kernel Documentation, without success.
    Thanks
    Last edited by mickael9 (2010-09-29 20:08:53)

    I use Plop bootmanager to boot from usb cause my PC cant boot from usb because of BIOS
    http://www.plop.at/en/bootmanager.html
    I actually use a older version that seems to work better than newer one
    link to mine> http://multidistro.com/downloads/plpbt
    grub legacy entry
    title Plop
    root (hdx,x)
    kernel /boot/plpbt
    grub2
    menuentry "Plop" {
           set root='(hd0,1)'
           search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set e6adb195-3201-42f0-b6d6-f175abe1912c
           linux16 /boot/plpbt
    see if that works

  • Running new 10.8.2 on my pro 2x3 Ghz Quad core with 32 GB DDR2. everything seem to slow and frezze up some time

    I had fresh installed 10.8.2 on eight core with 32 GB of Ram. Everything seem to slow and frezze up sometime.  but running OSX 10.6.8 is fine. Can anyone help
    System Spec:
    Mac OSX 10.8.2
    Pro: 2x3 Ghz Quad-core Intel Xeon
    Memory: 32 GB 667 MHz DDR2
    Hard drive Raid 1-0: 500 GB

    I am certainly confused. 10.8.2 is not supported on pre-2008's. There was an 8-core 2008 that has 800MHz DDR2 FBDIMMs (and can accept 667MHz as well).
    A clean install is the safest and best way, you can migrate or let Setup Assistant import your settings.
    Old PowerPC apps, drivers and plugins are a no-no, no Rosetta. Check Roaringapps.com
    Put your system on an SSD.
    Put your data on a non-array or if you must use a mirror only. Stripe is fine. Both should have 2-3 backups and extra redundancy instead of trying software based 1+0 with four drives.
    Upgrade to new(er) drives. And format them with ML. Build or rebuild the arrays in ML.
    Where is SL located compared to ML? same drive with different partition? or different disk drives?
    10.8.5 is current and other than support for 3TB drives, you should not be using anything less than 10.8.3.

  • Satellite P300 - 01S or PSPCCC-01S01C CPU is underclocked with each Bios update

    Why is Toshiba crippling the performance of the CPU ,FSB and Memmory speed with each bios update
    when perchased bios version 1.60     
     *    internal clock speed 2001 MHz
    update to Bios version 1.80
    *   internal clock speed 1995 MHz
         crippled performance by .5 %
    update to Bios version 2.50
    *    internal clock speed 1993.4
         crippled performance by 1.95 %
    *    other issues fan coming on more often
         intel wireless unstable
         etc
    in this last Bios update 2.50 a noticable drop in performance under load
    I paid for >>"Intel® Core™ 2 Duo Processor P7350 (2.0GHz 1066MHz FSB, L1 Cache 32KB/32KB, L2 Cache 3MB)"  not a 1.9 Processor
    >> YOU ARE CRIPPLING THE FSB AND MEMMORY TIMINGS AND UNDER CLOCKING MY LAPTOP <<
    I would like it restored to its former advertised speed 2.0GHz
    The reduced speed is noticable.
    everyone should check for obvious reduced performance
    Thank YOU
    This is the make and model i perchased Model:     PSPCCC-01S01C - Satellite P300 - 01S
    (Mercury Silver Top Cover - ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650)
    PS/AC Adaptor:     Model: PA-1121-04 Toshiba Part No: PA3290E-3AC3 (Input 100-240V~2.0A 50-60Hz, Output 19V 6.3A) Three Pins Plug Connector
    FCC ID:      WiFi® CJ6UPA3655WL, Bluetooth™ RYYEYTFXCS (Sticker in the Battery Compartment)
    IC:     WiFi® 248H-DPA3655W, Bluetooth™ 4389B-EYTFXCS (Sticker in the Battery Compartment)
    Contains Radio Device:     WiFi® 512AN_MMW, Bluetooth™ EYTFXCS (Sticker in the Battery Compartment)
    CMII ID:     Bluetooth™ 2007DJ1022 (Sticker in the Battery Compartment)
    Environmental Credentials:     Energy Star 4.0 (Sticker on Upper Cover)
    RoHS
    Operating System:     Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Home Premium Edition SP1 64-bit Operating System
    - Bilingual English or French Operating System

    thank you for your repley
    i am very much in favor of stability ,reliability and performance but the fact remains
    that Toshiba Techs have made a conscious  and willfull decision to under clock the laptop and make no
    mention that the bios updates may result in processing reduction, as for the call to tech support it was fruitless
    because they are clueless as to why such things happen (Corporate Denial).
    In Canada there were two very close speced laptops
    one for 899.00 CAD with 1.9 GHz CPU
    and the one I bought 2 months ago 1149.00 CAD 2.0 GHz
    To me this looks like Toshiba overclocking the laptop to get out the retail door.
    its not just affecting me, it affects everyone that buys a Toshiba laptop.
    I will not back down on this point. The origional advertised and paid for specs, should
    be restored in an upcoming bios update. If not, then it just confirms my original
    findings.
    This is refered to as "BAIT and SWITCH" and the practice is illegal in Canada.

  • K9N2 Diamond works with X2 3800+ but not Phenomii 940 with updated BIOS

    The system in question.
    MSI K9N2 Diamond Current BIOS 7375v 2.6, have also tried 2.5, 2.4, 2.3, 2.2
    AMD Phenom II 940
    2X 2Gb Corsair CM2X2048-6400C5
    Antec True Power 750 Watt P.S.
    EVGA Nvidia GTX 260 GPU
    W.D. 300Gb HDD
    This system is about 6 months old. When I put this system together for my brother in law, he ordered the parts with the intention of using his old mobo but didn't realize it didnt support the phenom chip he ordered. SO rather than waiting for another ordered part we took a trip to our local Comp USA. K9N2 Diamond said it was phenom 2 ready, yeah ok. Anyway after a few hours of going crazy trying to figure this out for him I found out it wasn't phenom2 capable till you updated the BIOS with an older CPU. Lucky for us I use an X2 3800+ in my machine. So I popped my chip in and ipdated his BIOS with the USB drive tool. Everything seemed right with the world then.
     Now he brought the PC over for me to install Windows 7 64 bit for him. Did the install and was tracking down the few drivers Windows 7 missed and ran across Live update 4 for drivers and utilities. Should have known better but I went ahead and let it update the BIOS to 2.6. Sure enough, the CPU and GPU fans cycle on and off with no post. Check this post as his issues are identical to the ones I am experiencing. https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=133615.0 Now they never resolved this guys issue and it looks like he just RMA'd the board.
    So I started narrowing down the possible issues. First thing I did was find the MSI USB Flash Tool again and put BIOS 2.2 back on with my 3800+ back in his machine. Machine worked with every BIOS version from 2.2 to 2.6 installed with USB tool with my 3800+ in his machine but would not post at all with all BIOS versions and his phenomII. Every time his CPU is in the machine, when the power is turned on the CPU and the GPU fans both go to max RPM then turn off over and over. Cleared CMOS multiple times. I know the clear was working when I put my 3800+ in it would state the time was reset in BIOS. Pulled everything out but one stick of RAM and same thing, posts with 3800+, nothing with phenomII. Tried the other stick of RAM although it passed both a memory test with USB tool and memtest with 3800+ installed. Same. Pulled CoolMax 750W PS from my machine and put it in his. Same issues. No post with PhenomII, posts with 3800+. Now this is with NOTHING but a stick of known good RAM, PS, Mobo, CPU and CPU fan. Using onboard video. All other drives, fans, pci devices, ect are disconnected.
    So now I have 2 machines in my office all taken apart as I do not want to have to button my machine back up just to tear it back apart in case I have to do more to his Mobo with my CPU. I would rather not have to RMA the board if I do not have to like the guy in the link to the post I put up above.

    I understand the need for future proofing mainboards as much as possible. What I am not ok with is the labeling on the box stating the board is PhenomII ready when in fact it isn't ready unless you have an older CPU that you can use to flash the BIOS to make it ready. Plus, if Live Update is the POS that everyone makes it out to be on the forums, why is it the first option on MSI's website for driver and BIOS downloads? MSI's USB Flash Tool is probably one of the easiest things I have ever used to update a BIOS, why not have that as the first option?
    Anyway, I managed to talk a buddy into bringing his rig over to help me figure this out. Replaced his 965 with the 940 in question and it fired right up in an ASUS M4A785-M mobo. Tried the memory and PS in his rig as well just to triple check them and they were also good. Put his 965 in the K9N2 Diamond after making sure the BIOS was version 2.6 with the 3800+ and did not fire up with his 965 in the socket.
    So a quick recap.
    940 and 965 PhenomII will not post in the K9N2 Diamond but the 3800+ will.
    All three post in the M4A785
    tested memory by using only the slot closest to CPU in K9N2 on stick at a time. Both sticks work in the K9 with the 3800+ and both sticks work in the M4A785 with all three CPU's.
    have tried every BIOS version from 2.2 to 2.6 using the MSI USB Flash Tool with the 3800+ in the K9N2.
    Have cleared CMOS multiple times with the power cord out and holding down the On/Off switch for 20 seconds to discharge the caps before clearing. After every clear the next successful post says that the BIOS time needs to be updated.
    P.S. works on three different rigs.
    Any ideas or suggestions? If I must RMA than I must. But it works with the 3800+ so there has to be something firmware wise that is causing this.

  • Your recommendations on budget mobo with descent bios features?

    I need a new motherboard for work, so its a budget board with descent bios features I will overclock but am unlikely to go ballistic. Also I thought I'd use integrated video. I will also be replacing the cpu and was likely to get AMD possibly dual core so I guess I will stick with a 939 version. What are your thoughts?

    Quote from: amt on 02-June-06, 17:42:07
    what about this one http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=693, Website doesn't detail what bios options they have.
    Download the manual for it and read through the boards bios manual section . (thats what I did with the other one)
    http://66.96.84.4/support/mnu_exe/mbd_mnu/E7191v1.2.zip

  • Problem with downgrading bios. MSI P67A-GD65 (B3).

    Hi!
    I'm having problems with downgrading my bios from version 4.3 to 1.19. I want to downgrade, because 4.3 doesn't want to boot when I use xmp settings for my RAM ( that might be related to my CPU since I have i5 2500k which is 32nm and 4.3 version of BIOS is recommended for 22nm processors ). When I try to flash with the MSI Forum HQ USB Flashing Tool I'm getting an error: "Rom file ROMID is not compatible with existing BIOS ROMID". I've ran out of ideas how to downgrade my bios so I'm asking you for help. My specs:
    MOBO: MSI P67A-GD65 (B3)
    CPU: INTEL CORE i5 2500K
    RAM: G.SKILL RIPJAWS X 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 1600MHZ CL6 (F3-12800CL6D-4GBXH)

    Here you go. GD65 and GD55 usde the same BIOS files;
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=179837.msg1295420#msg1295420

  • Hi, I have iPad 2, when I buy it it has old iOS. Then I update it now it has 5.1.1 iOS and modern firmware 4.12.01. After update my wifi is not working. Only searching for wifi. 3G working well. But wifi olso worked with old iOS. So what can do ? Pls

    Hi, I have iPad 2, when I buy it it has old iOS. Then I update it now it has 5.1.1 iOS and modern firmware 4.12.01. After update my wifi is not working. Only searching for wifi. 3G working well. But wifi olso worked with old iOS. So what can do ? Pls

    Look at iOS Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections  http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398
    iPad: Issues connecting to Wi-Fi networks  http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3304
    iOS: Recommended settings for Wi-Fi routers and access points  http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4199
    Additional things to try.
    Try this first. Turn Off your iPad. Then turn Off (disconnect power cord for 30 seconds or longer) the wireless router & then back On. Now boot your iPad. Hopefully it will see the WiFi.
    Go to Settings>Wi-Fi and turn Off. Then while at Settings>Wi-Fi, turn back On and chose a Network.
    Change the channel on your wireless router (Auto or Channel 6 is best). Instructions at http://macintoshhowto.com/advanced/how-to-get-a-good-range-on-your-wireless-netw ork.html
    Another thing to try - Go into your router security settings and change from WEP to WPA with AES.
    How to Quickly Fix iPad 3 Wi-Fi Reception Problems
    http://osxdaily.com/2012/03/21/fix-new-ipad-3-wi-fi-reception-problems/
    If none of the above suggestions work, look at this link.
    iPad Wi-Fi Problems: Comprehensive List of Fixes
    http://appletoolbox.com/2010/04/ipad-wi-fi-problems-comprehensive-list-of-fixes/
    Fix iPad Wifi Connection and Signal Issues  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwWtIG5jUxE
    Fix Slow WiFi Issue https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2398063?start=60&tstart=0
    Unable to Connect After iOS Update - saw this solution on another post.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4010130
    Note - When troubleshooting wifi connection problems, don't hold your iPad by hand. There have been a few reports that holding the iPad by hand, seems to attenuate the wifi signal.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    If any of the above solutions work, please post back what solved your problem. It will help others with the same problem.
     Cheers, Tom

  • Qosmio X300-14Y- How can I find the old BIOS version 1.90?

    Hi,
    First of all; I am so sorry for my bad english knowledge..
    Im from Turkey.
    I use x300 14 y since one week. factory bios version for vista 32 bit 1.90. But I upgraded to 2.10.
    How can I find old bios 1.90 setup file again. ? Please help.......

    You are right. On Toshiba download page you will not be able to find older BIOS version.
    When the new BIOS update is realised the old one will not be available for download.
    If you need older version contact nearest authorized service provider.
    They must have it. Be cool and talk with them. Maybe they can send it to you per mail.

  • Lion OS to ever support the older Intel Core Duo processors?

    Does Apple Lion OS have any intention of supporting the older Intel Core Duo processors?  If not, then doesn't that mean there's a lot of Mac's that are going to be left behind?  Does Apple plan to do anything else for these Mac's?

    Intel Core Duos are older machines - the last one was discontinued in September 2006 (if I remember correctly); that means the newest of them is about 5 1/2 years old - a lifetime for electronics.
    As for Apple having any plans for these older machines: first, we are not allowed to speculate here, but I can't see anyone supporting or doing anything for a computer that age.

  • Pls, help. Activation lock with old ID not my ID when update ios 7.0.4

    i bought old iphone 4s with ios 7.0.3, i signed in my ID icloud in setting. i update ios to 7.0.4. I get activation lock with old id not my id. I can't pass activation lock my iphone, pls...help me

    hoatrieuvan wrote:
    i restore ios 7.0.4 and I get the old previous owner ID. pls.... help
    The Apple ID and Password that was Originally used to Activate the iDevice is required
    If you do not have that information you will not be able to use the Device.
    Activation Lock in iOS 7  >  http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5818

  • Problem making modified WCF web service operation compatible with old client

    Hi,
    I am trying to make a modified version of a a WCF web service work with old clients. The method signature looks like:
    [OperationContract]       
    itemList GetItemList(getItemList param);
    I am adding elements to the "getItemList" class which should be optional. The class is generated from XSD schema with xsd.exe (this means we are using schema-first design). The new element is:
    <element name="itemOwner" type="string" maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="0">      </element>
    and the new generated code in the getItemList class becomes:
    private string itemOwnerField;       
    public string itemOwner
    get {return this.itemOwnerField;}
    set {this.itemOwnerField = value; }
    When I look at the new WSDL it has:
    <xs:element name="itemOwnerField" nillable="true" type="xs:string"/>
    Now I was expecting the old client to still be able to call the new client, since the new field is nillable. The client has a service reference to the old version of the web service so it uses a C# stub. When the old client tries to invoke the new service,
    I get error:
    The formatter threw an exception while trying to deserialize the message: There was an error while trying to deserialize parameter http://tempuri.org/:param. The InnerException message was 'Error in line 1 position 754. 'Element' 'itemIDField' from namespace
    'http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/ServerBaseAPI' is not expected. Expecting element 'itemOwnerField'.'.  Please see InnerException for more details.
    My interpretation is that the server side of the new service cannot deserialize the incoming message since it expects it to contain itemOwnerField. Why it that, when it is nillable according to the WSDL? What can I do to solve or work around the problem?

    Hi gaor.mawell,
    The nillable attribute is a special attribute in the XML Schema instance namespace that provides an interoperable way to explicitly represent a null value. The receiving end can interpret these as
    null, zero, and null, respectively. There is no guarantee that a third-party deserializer can make the correct interpretation, which is why this pattern is not recommended. The
    DataContractSerializer class always selects the correct interpretation for missing values. So have you tried to use the DataMember's
    IsRequired property? this
    DataMember's
    IsRequired property tells the serialization engine whether the value of itemOwnerField must be presented in the underlying XML.
    For more information, please try to refer to the this artcle:
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa347792(v=vs.110).aspx .
    Best Regards,
    Amy Peng
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

Maybe you are looking for