Support for the JPEG 2000 Image Format?

Does anyone know whether Adobe plans to support JPEG 2000 at
some time?

The RAW file format of the Nikon D90 is supported by Aperture 2, but not earlier versions, according to:
http://www.apple.com/aperture/specs/raw.html
* Requires Aperture 2 with Mac OS X v10.4.11 Tiger or Mac OS X v10.5.2 Leopard or later.
Download the trial version of Aperture 2 and see what happens.
Do not connect the camera directly to the Macinotsh. Use a card reader that is compatible with your cards, copy the files from the card reader to a dedicated folder of your choosing, and then import the image files from the folder.

Similar Messages

What is the most suitable image format for processing with imaq?

Hello.
What is the most
suitable image format for processing with imaq?
I want to capture an image of a usb webcam, store and
then process it with imaq. I need to know what format to save the
captured image can then load and process it with imaq vision.
Thanks

The only criteria is: don't use JPEG for anything scientific! The compression involved with saving JPEGs means you always lose information. I tend to prefer PNG - it's compressed, but non-lossy, and also widely supported. TIFF is fine as well, but I don't think has any advantages over PNG for this application. JPEG2000 can give good non-lossy compression I think is slower to read/write than PNG.

Problem with "Insufficient data for image" and embedded JPEG 2000 Images

I frequently download pdf from the http://www.glorecords.blm.gov web site. They are reporting a problem with Reader Reader 10.1.4 and the pdf files they have.
"("Insufficient data for image" and embedded JPEG 2000 Images)"
I am experiencing the same "Insufficient data for image" error when opening their downloaded pdf and viewing in ACROBAT X 10.1.4.
Can someone address this please?
Win 7 sp1

Read this:
http://blogs.adobe.com/dmcmahon/2012/08/21/acrobat-insufficient-data-for-an-image-error-af ter-updating-to-10-1-4-or-9-5-2/

Does after effects cs5 support jpeg 2000 images?

HI,
I am using photoshop cs5 and after effects cs5.
does after effects cs5 support jpeg 2000 images?
if not,then do we have something like encoder or decoder or plugin to make this thing work?
Vinay

I run AE 8 at work, and I have absolutely no problem with Jpeg 2000 stuff. I don't see why you would on AE 10.
And if you don't have it already, go download the latest version of Quicktime 7. Don't get Quicktime 10 or X or whatever they call it: it's a train wreck ready to happen. If you steel yourself to spend an extra 35 bucks, you can get Quicktime Pro, probably one of the most versatile little pieces of software available.

FR: JPEG 2000 Preview Format

I'd like to get PNG Image Sequence added as a preview option for all sequences. There are several benefits to using PNG for this purpose. They're lossless, so the previews can be used for export without any degradation. They're significantly smaller than other lossless options like TIFF or DPX. They can can contain alpha channel for transparencies. They can be up to 16 bit depth. And perhaps one of the largest benefits is that as an image sequence, preview rendering can be interrupted and resume where it left off. This is not possible with normal video files. If you stop a render, you have to start over. Not so with an Image Sequence.
Combine JPG2000 previews with the new Background Rendering feature suggested below, and I think PP becomes a much better NLE.
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1369235?tstart=0
Opinions?
[Thread title changed to reflect new request.]
https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
*******Enhancement / FMR*********
JPEG 2000 Previews
I would love to have the JPEG 2000 format available as an option for previews in all sequence presets.
Why is this feature important to you?
The ideal preview format should offer:
1. No resolution or frame rate limitations.
2. Sufficient quality to be used for export.
3. Can compete with UT or DNxHD for speed.
4. Doesn't take inordinate room on the hard drive.
5. Can be resumed if render is interrupted/Only changed frames need rerendering.
JPEG 2000 is probably the ONLY option that offers all these features.

Boy, you ain't kidding.
My one minute test created UT, DNxHD and AVC-I files in less than a minute. The MPEG I-Frame took less than 30 seconds. The PNG files took over 14 minutes! This format is not nearly as practical as I imagined it would be.
Further, the PNG files actually took up more room than the UT, DNxHD and AVC-I files, though far less than TIFF and DPX, which are wholly too large to be practical.
That still leaves us with something of an issue to be resolved, though.
What preview format can offer these features (with this order of priority).
1. No resolution or frame rate limitations
2. Sufficient quality to be used for export
3. Can compete with UT or DNxHD for speed?
4. Doesn't take inordinate room on the hard drive
5. Can be resumed if render is interrupted/Only changed frames need rerendering
PNG fails big time at 3.
DPX and TIFF fail at 3 and 4.
UT fails at 5 and sometimes 2 (being 8 bit).
Uncompressed fails at 4, 5 and sometimes 2 (being 8 bit).
MPEG fails at 1, 2 and 5.
DNxHD and AVC-I fail at 1 and 5.
V-210 fails at 5.
What's left?

Why no support for the Leica M9 in LR 2.6 RC?

Hi - bemused that there's no support for the M9 in this release (especially as LR is bundled with the M9). Even more confusing as the Standard Adobe calibration profile for the M9 that comes with the LR3 Beta is pretty good (beats the embedded profile that comes with the Leica DNGs) - and this can be added to the LR2.5 profile library with a bit of copying and pasting.
I'd be grateful to hear from Adobe if there's any chance of a good M9 profile making it to the 2.6 final version. Seems a shame to miss this opportunity.
Thanks
Chris Tribble

Hello Chris,
thanks for the nice feedback.
For the moment, I will use LR for the fast preview of all images,
cataloging etc., and RawDeveloper for the fine tuning, as often as the
image permit it.
(sorry for my english!)
Lets hope that we will get through all that without loosing our
perfectly nice temper !
All the best to you,
Alain
Le 11 déc. 09 à 09:39, Chris_Tribble a écrit :
Alain - 1eme - je suis un particulier - aucun fonction chez Adobe.
Aussi -
je m'excuse d'avant pour mon Francais bottant et sans elegance! Je
n'ai
jamais fais des etuded en francais - et aussi mon clavier anglais
manquent
les diacritiques...
>
Quelque petit reponses.
>
>>>> First I have installed the 2.6 version, that is said to work
>>>> alongside the 2.5... but of course, it has replaced it. How to
>>>> reinstall the 2.5 alongside, hase they have the same name ?
>>>
>>> C'est pas la peine - 2.6 est meilleur - vous pouvez rester
>> avec ca...
>
>> ok, mais c'est tout de même juste le contraire de ce que
>> disent sur le site Adobe vos notes d'installation (rien de
>> très neuf non plus en cette matière, hélas, quant aux infos
>> approximatives ou manquantes d'Adobe)
>
CT: Pas vrais je crois - Version 3 beta peut co-exister - mais 2.6
doit
remplacer 2.5...
>
>>>> And then, I have tried to find a M9 profile, read your
>> posts, do my
>>>> job, install the beta 3.0, fond the "M9 Digital Camera Adobe
>>>> Standard.dcp", put a copy of that in any cameraRaw description
>>>> files... and so what ? In 2.6, I only have the choice between
>>>> "embeded" (=incorporé in french) and "Adobe standard" when
>> I select a
>>>> M9 dng file / but I've more choice when I select a M8 dng
>> file (ACR
>>>> 4.4, ACR 3.6, Adobe standard, Adobe standard beta 2,
>> camera standard,
>>>> camera standard beta 2).
>>>> 1. Do I miss something ?
>>>> 2. what should I do to find and use the M9 specific profile ?
>>>>
>>
>>>> Encore une fois - il n'y a pas de probleme...
>>> "Adobe Standard" marche tres bien...
>> moui... si vous le dites... mais il me convient assez mal, et
>> j'aimerais tout de même comprendre pourquoi je ne peux pas
>> charger un profil correspondant à mon M9... je ne comprends
>> pas non plus pourquoi il n'y a pas de profil par optique
>> développé par Leica... et en Suisse, personne de chez eux ne
>> peut répondre à ces questions... alors même que LR 2.5 est
>> livré en bundle avec le m9!
>
CT: Alors - Adobe Standard EST le profil developé par Adobe pour le
M9 - et
c'est le meme qu'on trouve dans LR 3 beta. Selon mon experience c'est
meilleur que le "embedded profile". Pas parfait, mais pas mal non
plus
Vous pouvez vous meme telecharger le DNG editor
(http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Profiles).
>
>
>> je suis professionnel, et très loin d'être heureux avec LR...
>> (ni avec aucun raw developper, pour être franc, ni
>> captureOne, ni... encore que justement, RawDevelopper a des
>> qualités intéressantes - à côté de grande faiblesses... mais
>> c'est encore un autre sujet)
>>
>> mais j'ai bien l'intention de m'accrocher, ne serait-ce que
>> pour la puissance de gestion/catalogage et l'interface de
>> LR... quoi que je n'ai aucune confiance en son bricolage des
>> dng -> donc multiplier les backups des fichiers tels que
>> sortis du m9, etc... on dirait bien que malgré 15 ans
>> d'expérience, nous en soyons toujours au balbutiements du digital !
>>
>> C'est tout de même plus sérieux (du point de vue des
>> résultats) du côté de Leaf (j'utilise un L75 sur Alpa
>> 12SWA)... ça ressemble à quelque chose, mais en petit format,
>> après le m8, le m9 est vraiment encore loin du compte ! Et
>> leur développeur, bien sûr, ne développe... que leurs
>> fichiers propriétaires. Lorsque quelqu'un aura décidé dans
>> quelques années que leur format .mos est dépassé, mon travail
>> sera tout simplement perdu. Sauf à convertir en catastrophe
>> quelques dizaines ou centaines de milliers de fichiers ?
>> Encourageant, n'est-ce pas ?
>>
>>> By the way, I also had this blue pixels lines in the 2500iso
>>>>
>>>> files... anyway to save back the file without this bug ?
>>>
>>> Je ne vois pas cette image .... Peut etre vous pourriez
>> m'envoyer par
>>> email? (mailto:mailto:mailto:[email protected])
>> Je ne l'ai malheureusement pas avec moi, sur mon portable, et
>> n'y accéderai plus avant quelques jours...
>>
>> Leica Suisse (avec qui je suis en relation directe et qui a reçu ce
>> fichier) vient de m'appeler et ils reconnaissent - enfin - le
>> problème.
>> Mais ils ne savent toujours pas si et comment il vont le résoudre.
>> Rien avant l'année prochaine, quoi qu'il en soit, et ce sera
>> fixé, selon eux, soit :
>> - par un nouveau firmware (difficile à croire)
>> - par un passage de l'appareil entre leur mains, avec modif/
>> remplacement d'une partie du soft/hardware
>> - par un échange d'appareil (!!!) si c'est le capteur qui est
>> en cause (l'un de mes M8.2 avait été échangé de même à leur
>> frais après 3 mois, pour d'autres problèmes électroniques) Le
>> problème de ces lignes de pixels bleus sur certaines prises
>> de vue en haute sensibilité est largement débattu sur les
>> forums, et Leica vient de comprendre qu'il n'est pas
>> extérieur au M9, comme ils le disaient il n'y a pas si
>> longtemps... encore une petite bombe à leur actif !
>> Dite-moi si ça vous intéresse et je vous les ferai suivre...
>
CT: J'avais un tel probleme avec le M8.2 - chez le M9 pour le moment
ca
marche!
>>
>> Par ailleurs, ils viennent de me proposer de repasser toutes
>> mes optiques au banc (codées par leurs soins il y a moins
>> d'un an) pour les ajuster une nouvelle fois au mieux au m9...
>> là aussi, ils reconnaissent des failles techniques sérieuses
>> ! J'ai par exemple un summicron 35 asph parfait sur film et
>> sur m8, qui est... flou (sur les bords, et irrégulièrement)
>> sur mon m9 ! Interressant...
>>
CT: c'est vrais que les boittier numerique sont plus exigeant - je
conseil
un contact direct avec Leica a Solms.... Et aussi (si vous n'y etes
pas
inscrit deja) que vous faites appelle pour rejoindre le reseau Leica
Professional. Ca vaut la peine et augment le vitesse de reparation...
>
>>> Je vous conseiller aussi de visiter L-camera forum...
>>> (http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m9-forum/
>>> ) Vous y trouverez des francophones la bas et il y a beaucoup de
>>> bonnes informations...
>> je connaissais, mais les questions en français trouvent
>> rarement de l'écho... et le niveau technique n'est
>> malheureusement pas très élevé, malgré la gentillesse des
>> interlocuteurs.
>>
>
Oui! MAIS j'ai appris des choses la bas ...
>
>>> Bon courage!
>>> Chris
>>
>> Il en faut, en effet...
>> merci en tout cas !
>> (à propos, quelle est votre fonction chez adobe ? Puis-je
>> reprendre contact avec vous lors de mes prochaines
>> découvertes ?) Amitiés, Alain
>>
Encore une fois - bon courage..
>
Dr Christopher Tribble
MOBILE     || +44 (0)7917 473522
EMAIL     || mailto:[email protected]
WEB     || www.ctribble.co.uk
>

Firefox for Mac preferences shows .qif file format for quicken as "quicktime image format"-wrong application and won't let me select anything else

Post to Firefox forum; Oct.2011
Re: Quicken 2007; Mac OS 10.5
Problem: can’t import or download Qif format files into quicken from bofa or Chase. Mac can’t recognize; how do I set preferences in Firefox (or Safari).
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/new?product=desktop&category=d1&search=Firefox+for+Mac+preferences+shows+.qif+file+format+for+quicken+as+%22quicktime+image+format%22-wrong+application+and+won%27t+let+me+select+anything+else&showform=1
Hello,
I previously used Firefox on my old Mac G4 with OS 10.3.9; the above issue existed with that system and Firefox 2.00.2 (or similar). I then "tried" to move to a G5 Mac with OS 10.5, hoping that an updated Mac Operating system and updating Firefox would solve that problem.
I'm now working on my son's MacBook Pro, OS 10.5.8, 2.4 ghz Intel Core 2 Duo; 2gb Memory; 2 gb 667 Mhz DDR2 SDRAM.
I still have a problem in Firefox Preferences trying to download .qif files. BofA Mortgage accounts only allow downloading of .qif files. My .qfx download works fine, but the error message is as follows:
The error message is that this is a corrupted file or one that Preview doesn't recognize.
and it is still a problem when trying to download Quicken .qif format files for our B of A mortgage.
The preferences for Firefox under File Helpers won't let me name the extension I want; instead, it CONFUSES .qif (Quicken Interchange Format) with .qtif (Quicktime Image Format) for Mac.
Therefore, when I download .qif files and try to import them to Quicken, I get a message that this is a corrupted file:
thanks for any help.
Val in Seattle

Well, in the end, I just gave up and deleted the photos, in the hope that it was something to do with them. Took some more photos and they seem to have imported without any problems at all.
Given that the same irksome photos loaded on the wife's macbook without so much as a murmur, how weird is that?
Still- all's well that ends well. Thanks for the suggestions- much appreciated.
Matt

[Consolidation-Locked] Please add RAW support for the Nikon D600 to Lightroom as soon as possible!

My Fair Adobe,
Please add RAW support for the Nikon D600 to Lightroom as soon as possible!
ViewNX lets me get to the images, but come on!!! I know Lightroom, and you, ViewNX, are no Lightroom.
Yes, I see everyone else ASKING for D600 support. I'm here to beg for it! Don't make me wait much longer!
Message title was edited by: Brett N
Message title was edited by: Brett N

Rob, my reading of your site is that this plug-in copies settings from raw to jpeg, does it work the other way around as well?
Rob Cole wrote:
One of the great things about the new 0-based defaults and linear tone curve is:
You can develop the jpegs now, in Lightroom, and then sync the settings to the raws later (e.g. using RawPlusJpeg), and provided you select a matching camera profile, they will look almost the same (white balance won't translate over, but everything else will, more or less). Beware lens corrections applied to the raws might alter the registration of precision local adjustments.
Note: I recommend shooting with ADL off in order for this to work better, and consider turning sharpening off in camera as well, and noise reduction and everything else to whatever extent is possible.
Rob

How can I use JPEG-2000 images with my old Elements 2.0?

Is there a plug-in or other step that will allow me to work with JPEG-2000 images using my Elements 2.0 software?

I do apologize, as i should have asked what operating system you were using.
Anyway, It looks like that plugin is to new for pse 2 on the mac side.
I believe it only works in pse 6 and newer, though they used to have older versions, there doesn't seem to be any links to them.
You should remove that plugin and for future reference, plugins/filters should go in the Plug-Ins folder, not in the photoshop elements 2.0 application package.
Are you able to open the jpeg 2000 files in the Preview application?

Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version , SQL Server Extended Events , Optimizing Reading from XML column datatype

Team , Thanks for looking into this ..
As a last resort on optimizing my stored procedure ( Below ) i wanted to create a Selective XML index ( Normal XML indexes doesn't seem to be improving performance as needed ) but i keep getting this error within my stored proc . Selective XML
Index feature is not supported for the current database version.. How ever
EXECUTE sys.sp_db_selective_xml_index; return 1 , stating Selective XML Indexes are enabled on my current database .
Is there ANY alternative way i can optimize below stored proc ?
Thanks in advance for your response(s) !
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes] Script Date: 3/11/2015 3:10:42 PM ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
-- EXEC [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON --Does'nt have impact ( May be this wont on SQL Server Extended events session's being created on Server(s) , DB's )
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
select getdate() as getdate_0
DECLARE @XML XML , @Prev_Insertion_time DATETIME
-- Staging Previous Load time for filtering purpose ( Performance optimize while on insert )
SET @Prev_Insertion_time = (SELECT MAX(EE_Time_Stamp) FROM dbo.MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log ) -- Perf Optimize
-- PRINT '1'
CREATE TABLE #Temp
EventName VARCHAR(100),
Time_Stamp_EE DATETIME,
ObjectName VARCHAR(100),
ObjectType VARCHAR(100),
DbName VARCHAR(100),
ddl_Phase VARCHAR(50),
ClientAppName VARCHAR(2000),
ClientHostName VARCHAR(100),
server_instance_name VARCHAR(100),
ServerPrincipalName VARCHAR(100),
nt_username varchar(100),
SqlText NVARCHAR(MAX)
CREATE TABLE #XML_Hold
ID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY , -- PK necessity for Indexing on XML Col
BufferXml XML
select getdate() as getdate_01
INSERT INTO #XML_Hold (BufferXml)
SELECT
CAST(target_data AS XML) AS BufferXml -- Buffer Storage from SQL Extended Event(s) , Looks like there is a limitation with xml size ?? Need to re-search .
FROM sys.dm_xe_session_targets xet
INNER JOIN sys.dm_xe_sessions xes
ON xes.address = xet.event_session_address
WHERE xes.name = 'Capture DDL Schema Changes' --Ryelugu : 03/05/2015 Session being created withing SQL Server Extended Events
--RETURN
--SELECT * FROM #XML_Hold
select getdate() as getdate_1
-- 03/10/2015 RYelugu : Error while creating XML Index : Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version
CREATE SELECTIVE XML INDEX SXI_TimeStamp ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml)
FOR
PathTimeStamp ='/RingBufferTarget/event/timestamp' AS XQUERY 'node()'
--RETURN
--CREATE PRIMARY XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index
--SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_2
-- RYelugu 03/10/2015 -Creating secondary XML index doesnt make significant improvement at Query Optimizer , Instead creation takes more time , Only primary should be good here
--CREATE XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold_values] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index , --There should exists a Primary for a secondary creation
--USING XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold]
---- FOR VALUE
-- --FOR PROPERTY
-- FOR PATH
--SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_3
--PRINT '2'
-- RETURN
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_3
INSERT INTO #Temp
EventName ,
Time_Stamp_EE ,
ObjectName ,
ObjectType,
DbName ,
ddl_Phase ,
ClientAppName ,
ClientHostName,
server_instance_name,
nt_username,
ServerPrincipalName ,
SqlText
SELECT
p.q.value('@name[1]','varchar(100)') AS eventname,
p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') AS timestampvalue,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS objectname,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ObjectType,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="database_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS databasename,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ddl_phase,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clientappname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_hostname"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clienthostname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_instance_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS server_instance_name,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="nt_username"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS nt_username,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_principal_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS serverprincipalname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="sql_text"]/value)[1]','Nvarchar(max)') AS sqltext
FROM #XML_Hold
CROSS APPLY BufferXml.nodes('/RingBufferTarget/event')p(q)
WHERE -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Perf Optimize - Filtering the Buffered XML so as not to lookup at previoulsy loaded records into stage table
p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') >= ISNULL(@Prev_Insertion_time ,p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime'))
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') ='Commit' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - Every Event records a begin version and a commit version into Buffer ( XML ) we need the committed version
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
AND p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'Replication Monitor' --Ryelugu : 03/09/2015 We do not want any records being caprutred by Replication Monitor ??
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_4
-- SELECT * FROM #TEMP
-- SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #TEMP
-- SELECT GETDATE()
-- RETURN
-- PRINT '3'
--RETURN
INSERT INTO [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
[UserName]
,[DbName]
,[ObjectName]
,[client_app_name]
,[ClientHostName]
,[ServerName]
,[SQL_TEXT]
,[EE_Time_Stamp]
,[Event_Name]
SELECT
CASE WHEN T.nt_username IS NULL OR LEN(T.nt_username) = 0 THEN t.ServerPrincipalName
ELSE T.nt_username
END
,T.DbName
,T.objectname
,T.clientappname
,t.ClientHostName
,T.server_instance_name
,T.sqltext
,T.Time_Stamp_EE
,T.eventname
FROM
#TEMP T
/** -- RYelugu 03/06/2015 - Filters are now being applied directly while retrieving records from BUFFER or on XML
-- Ryelugu 03/15/2015 - More filters are likely to be added on further testing
WHERE ddl_Phase ='Commit'
AND ObjectType <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
AND ObjectName NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
AND T.Time_Stamp_EE >= @Prev_Insertion_time --Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Performance Optimize
AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log] MN
WHERE MN.[ServerName] = T.server_instance_name -- Ryelugu Server Name needes to be added on to to xml ( Events in session )
AND MN.[DbName] = T.DbName
AND MN.[Event_Name] = T.EventName
AND MN.[ObjectName]= T.ObjectName
AND MN.[EE_Time_Stamp] = T.Time_Stamp_EE
AND MN.[SQL_TEXT] =T.SqlText -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 This is a comparision Metric as well , But needs to decide on
-- Peformance Factor here , Will take advise from Lance if comparision on varchar(max) is a vital idea
--SELECT GETDATE()
--PRINT '4'
--RETURN
SELECT
top 100
[EE_Time_Stamp]
,[ServerName]
,[DbName]
,[Event_Name]
,[ObjectName]
,[UserName]
,[SQL_TEXT]
,[client_app_name]
,[Created_Date]
,[ClientHostName]
FROM
[dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
ORDER BY [EE_Time_Stamp] desc
-- select getdate()
-- ** DELETE EVENTS after logging into Physical table
-- NEED TO Identify if this @XML can be updated into physical system table such that previously loaded events are left untoched
-- SET @XML.modify('delete /event/class/.[@timestamp="2015-03-06T13:01:19.020Z"]')
-- SELECT @XML
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_5
END
GO
Rajkumar Yelugu

@@Version : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 - 11.0.5058.0 (X64)
   May 14 2014 18:34:29
   Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
   Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
(1 row(s) affected)
Compatibility level is set to 110 .
One of the limitation states - XML columns with a depth of more than 128 nested nodes
How do i verify this ? Thanks .
Rajkumar Yelugu

Just bought a Nikon d750 and confused about adobe LR4 and PS6 support for the RAW files. I have DNG 8.7 but wondering if LR and PS will import direct soon Thanks for any advice

Just bought a Nikon d750 and confused about adobe LR4 and PS6 support for the RAW files. I have DNG 8.7 but wondering if LR and PS will import direct soon Thanks for any advice

Support for the Nikon D750 was introduced in the latest version of LR 5.7 and ACR 8.7 on Novemder 18th 2014.
Further updates to LR 4 were stopped when LR 5 was released on June 9th 2013. No further updates for bug fixes and new camera support.
Nada, LR 4 will never support Nikon D750. The Nikon D750 was introduced into the market in September 2014 some 15 months after further development of LR 4 was discontinued.
You can use the Adobe DNG program (free download for the package) to convert the Nef (raw) files from your Nikon D750 to the Adobe DNG format which will permit you to import those into LR 4. This is the crutch provided by Adobe to allow for the processing of raw files with outdated versions of LR and ACR.
You can also update the ACR plugin for PS CS6 to version 8.7 which can also work with the raw files from the D750. For direct support in Lightroom you will need to upgrade (paid) to version 5.7.

Is there support for the GraphicsFmt object in FrameMaker 11 ExtendScript?

I was reading the FDK documentation for FrameMaker 11 and I see that support has been added for Object formats using FO_GraphicsFmt.
Is there support for the GraphicsFmt object in FrameMaker 11 ExtendScript?
If not, when will it be added?
Another question: Will the ExtendScript documentation ever be improved?

Stuart,
I am pretty sure you can use the object from ExtendScript. With the FDK documentation you should be able to guess the property names in ExtendScript, but the easiest way is to use a small test document and write a small script to get at the GraphicsFmt object. Set a breakpoint and use the Data Browser and/or JavaScript Console to see how FM uses the object.
As for better ExtendScript documentation: I am working on a website (www.progframe.com) that will feature better documentation, combining the current docs with stuff picked up from the FDK reference and test scripts. It will also have tutorials for newbie scripters. If Adobe does not put an effort into the docs, I might as well do it and possibly pick up some scripting jobs that way. I am planning to launch the website early next year and keeping it up to date so that ExtendScript info is immediately available when a new FM version hits the market.
Kind regards
Jang

RAW Support for the New EOS 5D

Please update the RAW plug-in to support the new Canon EOS 5D!

Andrew,
Version 3.2 of Camera Raw has unofficial support for the 5D (in other words it works NOW). Download version 3.2 and install it in the PROPER location. If the thumbnails still don't appear you should purge the cache for the folder containing the 5D images - assuming you installed it correctly it WILL work
BTW: if you'd gone to the camera Raw forum you would have already to the above info!

[svn:osmf:] 10440: Add parser support for the Video tag.

Revision: 10440
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-09-20 15:03:56 -0700 (Sun, 20 Sep 2009)
Log Message:
Add parser support for the Video tag. Add unit test for an empty document.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/.flexLibProperties
    osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/org/openvideoplayer/vast/model/VASTInlineAd.as
    osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/org/openvideoplayer/vast/parser/VASTParser.as
    osmf/trunk/libs/VASTTest/org/openvideoplayer/vast/parser/TestVASTParser.as
Added Paths:
    osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/org/openvideoplayer/vast/model/VASTMediaFile.as
    osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/org/openvideoplayer/vast/model/VASTVideo.as

The video tag only supports a few formats and MKV (Matroska Multimedia Container) isn't one of them.<br />
Your only option is to use the object (or embed) tag and use a player that can handle that format.<br />
If might be better to switch to the WebM format.<br />
* https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Media_formats_supported_by_the_audio_and_video_elements

No ext4 support for the micro SD

I have a 64GB micro SD card that I formatted to ext4 and works without any problem in my LG GPad 8.3 Android 4 tablet and Linux computer.
I tried it in my Z1C, but it tells me the SD is damaged.
When is Sony going to add ext4 support for the micro SD port?
It can't be that hard, as Android is based on Linux and Linux has support for ext4 for several years now.

As far as I know,only exFAT is supported for now.Contact xperia care for more info:
http://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/support/contact-us/
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us - J.R.R. Tolkien

Support for the JPEG 2000 Image Format?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for