Supported Resolutions

I have the 2009 13" Macbook Pro and am looking at new monitors, specifically this one:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009165
Is the Mini Display Port able to support the maximum resolution of (2048 x 1152) and if so, which connector DVI, HDMI, etc. would be the best option?

You may want to phone Monoprice and ask about the maximum resolution supported by their HDMI adapter(s). HDMI connections are most often used by people connecting to HDTV sets, which all run at 1920 x 1080 or 1920 x 1200. I don't recall seeing any posts here from people using HDMI to connect to computer monitors at higher resolutions than those, and I don't know whether or not it's possible. As far as I know, all such monitors have DVI inputs (as does the one you've linked above), and those can certainly be used at higher resolutions. Single-link DVI should support up to 2048 x 1536 — at least Apple's adapter does.
In your shoes, I'd go with DVI rather than HDMI.

Similar Messages

X fails to detect monitor supported resolutions

I have 3 monitors connected to a Radeon HD 7750, using the radeon driver:
Left: NEC MultiSync 90GX², 1280x1024, connected via DisplayPort-to-VGA adaptor
Middle: Samsung SyncMaster BX2335, 1920x1080, connected via DVI
Right: LG Flatron Wide, 1680x1050, connected via HDMI
On every reboot (warm or cold), X fails to detect the NEC monitor's supported resolutions. xrandr will only set it to 1024x768 or less, and it shows "no signal". However if I disconnect the VGA cable, plug it into another monitor (which is broken, but still powers on), and run xrandr again, it lists up to 1280x1024. If I then set the correct modes and layouts, then return the VGA cable to the NEC monitor, it works just fine. Turning the display off via xset doesn't cause any issue either. So on every reboot I have to move the cable to a spare monitor, set up xrandr, then move the cable back.
How can I save this working configuration and force X to apply it on boot even though the monitor for some reason claims to not support it?
I didn't have this issue with Ubuntu, but my setup was a bit different there, so possibly it just didn't manifest.
Here is the Xorg.0.log and journalctl -k from the most recent boot. The get-edid output is also interesting (and contains some control characters which pastebin removed).

The NEC on DVI would be only temporarily to get it's real edid-data .
Once you got that in a file, you can use a special kernel parameter at boot to force use of the real edid-data for the NEC monitor.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ke … s_and_EDID describes how it could be done.
Note that configuring this is tricky.

Maximum Supported resolution on graphics card???

Does anyone know the maximum supported resolution on the MacBook graphics card? I'd like to see if i could get a cheaper and bigger display than the ones made by apple. Any info would be appreciated.

No, that's just for the internal display.
Here's the info from Apple's hardware documentation
Extended Desktop Mode- In extended desktop mode, the resolution of the two displays can be set independently. In this mode, the maximum external display resolution supported by the MacBook is 2048 x 1536 at 60 Hz for analog displays and 1920 x 1200 at 60 Hz for digital displays.
1920x1200 is the native resolution for the 23" Apple display, the 24" Dell display, and probably some others. They work great with Macbooks.

Supported Resolutions for Powerbook 12" Rev A

I have a Rev A 12" Powerbook (867MHz) that has the Geforce 4MX 32MB graphics card. I was wondering if anyone knew the resolutions that my Powerbook supports and in particular if it would support a 1680x1050 resolution since I want to buy the Dell 2005FPW which runs at a native 1680x1050 resolution and use it as an external monitor.

Just for everyone's reference, in case this information is still needed....
The Rev.A 12" PowerBook supported resolutions and refresh rates for an external monitor, according to the technology specs PDF file available when it was first introduced:
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-top: 10px;"><tr valign="bottom"><td>Picture size in pixels</td><td>Maximum refresh rate</td><td>Pixel depth with
12-inch display inactive</td><td>Pixel depth with
12-inch display active</td></tr><tr><td>640 by 480</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>800 by 600</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>832 by 624</td><td>75Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>1024 by 768</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>1152 by 870</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>1280 by 960</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>1280 by 1024</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>1600 by 1200</td><td>75Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr></table>

Supported resolutions for new 27" iMac

Would someone with a 27" iMac please do me a favor and go to System Preferences -> Displays and post back the list of supported resolutions?
I took the resolution down a notch (from the default native resolution) on my current 24" and it will make the desktop fonts larger - albeit just a tad less crisp, but it's a whole lot better than having to squint.
In any case, I just spent 40 (!!) minutes on hold with the Apple store until my phone battery went dead - he put me on hold because he didn't know the answer to that simple question.

I am going to go out on a limb and guess Barbara isn't wanting a Mac Pro. Let me guess ... Price. By the time you plunk enough money for a 27 inch iMac to suit your needs, the Pro won't look so expensive. If you know what you are doing "under the hood," there is a seller of used Macs in your neck of the woods. Check out PowerMax in Beaverton, Oregon. Not long ago, the Pro could be downgraded and priced out at something like $1700 new. Why did that have to stop? I can see Windows better. Used W7 Beta and RC on this iMac and could see if fine, once I bumped up the DPI to 125%. Audio drivers didn't work correctly, among other BootCamp issues. I absolutely hate 10.6 and have returned to 10.5. Windows ain't so bad ..... honest. At least you get to have the box your way. Guess we both must have what suits our needs. You could get the 21.5 iMac (newest) and hook it up to an external screen. Um, how silly is that? Steve isn't doing either of us justice. Stubborn old goat!

T400 Supported resolution for external monitor

I have Video Adapter Intel GL40/GM45/GM47/GS45 Chipset - Graphics Controller 0 [B-3].
Can I use 24" monitor with native resolution 1920 x 1200 px (94 DPI) ?
Thank you
Solved!
Go to Solution.

hans_, welcome to the forum,
the simple answer is yes The maximum resolution that is supported is 2048 x 1536 @ 75Hz.
Hope this helps
Andy ______________________________________
Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
PepperonI blog

Why do 15.4" Macbook Pro's not support resolutions greater than 1440 x 900?

Hi.
I am a Microsoft .net software developer and am seriously considering getting a Macbook Pro to do some iPhone development. My company has provided me with a 15.4" Dell Precision M4400 that features an LED-backlit screen and nVidia Quadro FX 770M discrete graphics card, supporting 1920 x 1200 native resolution. I'd like to know why the 15.4" Macbook Pro's do not support anything greater than 1440 x 900 when it seems entirely possible? I understand that 17" MBP's do support 1920 x 1200 but it is not currently an option I'm considering pursuing due to the increased size and weight.
Thanks.
Jon
Message was edited by: jonb86uk

Just to be clear, since you're bringing up graphics cards - the 15" MBP supports up to 2560x1600 resolution on an external display, and simultaneously supports full native resolution on the internal display. As Phil points out, the native resolution of the 15" MBP's internal display is 1440x900, and Apple does not offer a higher resolution option for that model (although higher resolution 15" displays do exist). As to why that's the case, only Apple can answer that or change that.
You can submit feedback to Apple: http://www.apple.com/feedback/macbookpro.html.
As you know, if you want to use the iPhone SDK, you need an Intel-based Mac running Mac OS 10.5 Leopard.
Ps. Welcome back, Phil!!

GT 120 does not support resolution 1440 x 900?

Hi there.
I have a 15" Macbook Pro and wish to use the Apple remote desktop to control my 2009 Mac Pro remotely. However I can't figure out a proper resolution -- 1440x900 in the remote desktop... This resolution is not supported either when I work on the Mac Pro itself.
Suggestions are appreciated.
-oolong

Hi, SophiaHat and a Warm Welcome to Apple Discussions and the G5 Power Mac forum!
Do you have or are you buying a dual-core G5 with the PCI Express graphics?
http://www.apple.com/powermac/graphics.html
Which display do you have or are getting?
Can you link to the exact card you are thinking about?

Supported resolution different between OSX and XP

Hey guys,
I have a proview PL576Ws 15.4" widescreen connected to my macbook pro.
It supports up to a 1280x800 resolution but only in Windows XP, when I try to get it to display 1280x800 in Mac OSX Leopard it claims "MODE NOT SUPPORTED" and fails to display anything.
I have tried to use the utility SwicthResX in osx but it doesn't seem to work, even though I am staring at in at 1280x800 right now, writing this post.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance for your help.

Easiest way - Connect printer to Mac and Add in printer Setup. In Sharing Prefs, turn on Windows Sharing and Printer Sharing.
On the PC Add the printer (should be able to browse to see it). Here's the twist - change the driver on the PC so you send postscript to the Mac. Apple Color laserwriter xx is a good driver, already included on Win XP.
Good luck.

Supported resolutions on the Mini

Can the Mini support 1440 x 900 @ 60 hz reolution, I have a ViewSonic VA1912W widescreen monitor and I plan to buy a Mini in the next few days and that is the recommended setting for this monitor.

It really depends on whether your monitor is VGA or DVI. For DVI the max resolution is 1900 x 1200. For VGA it's 1900 x 1080. Both are larger than what you need, so you shouldn't have any problems.
The Mini's graphics output is DVI, but Apple includes an adapter for VGA monitors.
Based on what I found on the ViewSonic site, your monitor is VGA. However, it's best to check your monitor input just to be sure.
DVI inputs look like this:
VGA inputs look like this:
Ilya Smirnov

Qosmio X870-F0086 - Highest supported resolution via HDMI?

hi there
I have one of these, Toshiba Qosmio X870-F0086
http://www.toshibamea.com/ComputerProduct/4/Qosmio_X870-F0086/52569?pageid=4
I currently run an external monitor connected via HDMI with a resolution of 1920x1200
I would like to know if this Laptop supports higher resolutions via HDMI? 2560x1440 is what I require.
Please can someone assist.
Regards,
T

Good morning everyone (and Paulo ;) )
I have return to inform everyone that the specs stated on the Toshiba website are incorrect.
Yes, I was right.
I knew I was right from the start, as it simply made no sense to stipulate that 2048x1536 was the max res for analogue, but then to also state that 1920x1080 was the max for HDMI.
I knew that was wrong, as I had a 1920x1200 monitor connected via HDMI.
The bottom line, is that I now have a 2560x1440 monitor connected via HDMI at 60Hz.
*Works perfectly.*
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/t/qbxyn.jpg
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/t/8g566.jpg
My suggestion is that Toshiba update their website, to correctly reflect this scenario.
With the new generation monitors, more and more people will be asking these kinds of questions.
Cheers! :)

MSI TI4800SE supported resolutions.

I have a MSI TI4800SE and my old monitor died recently, and I have been thinking about getting a widescreen monitor to replace the old one. All the ones I have seen have a warning stating to make sure your card can support the resolution(1440x900 or 1680x1050). I do not see either of those resolutions in the manual, but it does say the actual settings may be different because of different monitors. So you can see why I am a bit confused. So if I do decide to get a widescreen monitor am I going to also have to get a new graphics card to fully utilize the monitor?

piercedfreak,
Quote
Supports super high resolution graphics modes
640x480 8/16/32 bit colors with 150Hz
800x600 8/16/32 bit colors with 150Hz
1024x768 8/16/32 bit colors with 120Hz
1152x864 8/16/32 bit colors with 120Hz
1280x1024 8/16/32 bit colors with 100Hz
1600x1200 8/16/32 bit colors with 85Hz
1920x1200 8/16/32 bit colors with 75Hz
2048x1536 8/16/32 bit colors with 60Hz
Take Care,
Richard

Re: Satellite R630 -13F: Possible supported resolution of external LCD screen

Hi there,
I am planning to purchase a LCD screen for my editing work.
My laptop is R630 -13F.
I was wondering if I get the high resolution LCD screen (2560 x 1440), would my laptop support such screen? Many thanks.
Tim

Hi
The external display resolution depends on the graphic card and the external monitor.
As far as I know the Intel graphic chip which is used in this notebook is able to handle the max resolution of 2048x1536 at 32bit
2560 x 1440 seems to be too high

Non Supported Resolutions

Is there a way to get resolutions that Mac OS X Leopard does not think your monitor can support. I have seen way better resolutions on my display under Linux than I have on Mac OS X.

<http://www.madrau.com/>
<http://www.3dexpress.de/>

Video support: resolution, portrait mode and aspect ratio

I have been playing with a friend's PowerPC-based mini (while I wait for Leopard to come out) and have some pre-purchase questions:
1) Do the current Core 2 Duo mac mini models support the VESA standard Preset Timing Mode of 1680 x 1050? (That's not listed on his older mac mini and would affect my choice of monitor.)
2) Does the current mac mini support portrait mode with any monitor at all?
3) The specs list maximum resolutions of 1920 x 1200 (16:10) with DVI and 1920 x 1080 (16:9) with VGA. I'm guessing that is related to bandwidth of the cable and does not mean that all output to DVI would be at the 16:10 aspect ratio and all output to VGA would be at the 16:9.

mexibeetle,
As far as the resolution of 1680x1050 I cannot answer you. I have a Power PC mini as well as an intel mini. The resolutions available change based on the display connected, but neither of mine offer that particular resolution (the 17" monitor I have does not go that high on the PPC mini via VGA and the intel mini is hooked up to a 40" LCD TV via HDMI...those resolutions are either 1600x900 or 1920x1080)
Neither my monitor nor my HDTV list that particular resolution (1680x1050) as being available, regardless of what they are connected to, so I cannot say whether or not the mini is capable of driving a screen at that resolution.
As to portrait mode, on both the older and newer minis in the display preference pane there is the option to rotate your image...90, 180 and 270 degrees. Mounting your monitor horizontal or vertical should not pose any problem as far as I can see.

Supported Resolutions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for