SUS Scenario Question

Hi all
I realise that there are limitations around both plan drive procurement and service procurement. Mainly around extended classic SRM and classic so no GR or invoice entry in SUS for extended classic.is the big problem.
We are running extended classic and do want both MM - SUS with material integration originating in MM system and SUS and Service procurement originating in SRM.
I can live with no GR in SRM no problem. However, is there a way that invoices can be entered into SUS for SRM POs and they transfer to the ECC back end rather than get posted in SRM and then can be sent to the backend and then transferred over the SRM after posting in SAP?
Has anybody tried this? What were the results?
Many thanks for sharing your experiences.

Hi Tracey,
Unfortunately what you expect is not possible. Also implementing MM-SUS and SRM-SUS with same SUS client is not feasible.
However if you switch to a classic scenario, then you can achieve your target as direct and indirect POs will be created in MM and these can be routed to SUS. Also invoice entered in SUS will be transferred to MM and will be reflected in SRM. But not sure if switching to classic scenario would affect your other business. You will have to take a call on that.
Regards,
Nikhil

Similar Messages

SRM, ROS and SUS scenario question

Hello Experts,
We are in the process of implementing MDM, ROS, EBP and SUS scenario in our present project. I went through the documentation. I have couple of questions.
1. Do we need to have seperate clients for ROS and SUS. What is the best practise.
2. Since we have SUS, once I transfer BP from ROS to EBP, check the portal vendor box, I would like to know how the registration code will be sent to supplier. Do we need to create the userid in EBP or with the receipt of registration code supplier will be able to create his first initial userid? Also how we can implement this with CUA and EP as part of landscape?
3. Also since we have MDM, how the new BP information can be migrated or mapped in MDM and how new BP can be sent to backend system? I understand there is BP monitor to check and approve the changes, but how the new BP will be transferred? Do we need to develop new XI message for this? if Yes, from where that can be managed? from EBP or MDM?.
I searched through help.sap.com for any documentation but no success.
Thanks in advance
Vijay.

Hi,
1.Refer the foll thread:
Re: Supplier Registration without SUS or XI?
2.For supplier registration,SUS is not mandatory.You need to configure ROS for this scenario.The extrenal vendors will register in ROS and then be replicated to R/3.
You can use EBP only for Supplier registration.
SUS,ROS and Bidding engine make up the SRM server 5.5/EBP component of SRM 5.0.
Pls refer the foll link for the complete process:
http://www50.sap.com/businessmaps/8F152C1AE8F1426FA3B442F905815F54.htm
For detailed settings/config of supplier registration,refer the foll threads:
Re: Not able to transfer suppliers from ROS to EBP
problems with ROS_PRESCREEN application for screen suppliers and manage bp
Re: SUPPLIER DIRECTORY (ROS) link not appearing in EBP in "SCREEN SUPPLIERS"
Supplier Directory
Re: Supplier Self registration
Re: SRM Supplier registration config
Re: External Web Service setting for Supplier Registration ROS to EBP
Re: Problems when transferring supplier from ROS to EBP...
3.Not worked on MDM so cant help you on this.
BR,
Disha.
Do reward points for useful answer

Few questions on EB-SUS scenario?

Dear Experts,
I have few questions on EB-SUS scenario which you may help with your expertise. It will be helpful for those who are new to scenario?
1. EB (enterpise Buyer or SRM) -SUS scenario is used for requesting external staff? can it be used for non stock or free text items in extended classic? does it support direct material procurement ?
2. Does EB-SUS or SRM-sus support service item with hierarchy like MM-SUS?
3. EB-SUS scenario is basically on extended classic or standalone scenario? But, in extended classic scenario, it does support only Purchase order and PO response scenario? What badi's or customization is required to enable the confirmation and invoice for extended scenarios?
Full marks for good answers !!!
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan

Hi,
I am also interested in this question with another view of it:
- Can SUS be used together with SRM (EB) for consumables in standalone scenario?
- What are your experiences with SUS in general. I foresee that we would need some add-on development to the solution, is this easily done or does it take a lot of effort?
Thanks for any good input
Fredrik

Schedule lines tranfer from R/3 to SUS in a MM-SUS scenario

Hi SRM gurus,
We are working on the MM-SUS scenario where the scheduling agreement is created in the backend R/3 system. Delivery schedule lines are generated in the backend and transfered to the SUS thru. ME9E transaction for sending the delivery schedule to the SUS.
We have a confirmation control key which guides us in SUS to create an ASN in the backend.
Though there is a confirmation control key exist in the SA for that particular line item, when the ASN is sent from SUS to XI to R/3. There is an idoc error in the R/3 which says that there is no confirmation control key though it is there for the line item which is transfered to SUS.
Now Pls. answer my questions :
1) Will ME9E transfer the total lines in the SA or the schedule lines with the delivery schedules only ?
2) Is it possible to resend the same schedule line ( with the updated delivery schedule) to the SUS as per the standard scenario?
3) In the SUS how do we findout the materials corresponding to that particular delivery schedule line. Because in SUS the reference is only the scheduling agreement number as we could not see any scheduline line item.
Pls. suggest.
We are working on SRM(SUS) 5.0 with ECC6.0 as the backend.
Best regards,
Sridhar.

i have seen the code --> where the FM is called for creation of SAR in SRM.
that is FM
BBP_SAPXML1_SUSPO_CREATE_IN --> in this --> search for this
Call API
      IF ls_header-description EQ 'DELINS'.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_API_SUSPO_CRT'
        EXPORTING
          is_header   = ls_header
          it_item     = lt_item
          it_attach   = lt_attach
          it_partner = lt_partner
          it_longtext = lt_longtext
          it_tax      = lt_tax
          it_limit    = lt_limit
          it_sdln     = lt_sdln
        IMPORTING
          es_header   = ls_header_e
this one creates ---> the SAR in SRM.
and also i have seen further --> there is no place where any BADI is also called.
i am afraid it is not possible to control what you want using BADI.
only --> difference between --> New document and the old document is
the Indicator --> C for create
U for update.
And Also if you can see the XML message for the updated document --> you can see all the lines in the XML message.
Not the added lines...

SUS Material PO for EBP-SUS scenario

Hi All,
We are planning to implement EBP-SUS scenario for PO.
My Question is Can we use EBP-SUS scenario for material PO,POR and ASN
in extended classic mode.
Please help.I need this info urgently.
Also if anyone has config settings document for this scenaio then I would appreciate
if they can share with me Priyasinghsap at gmail
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Priya
Edited by: priyasinghsrm on May 23, 2010 11:20 PM

As far as I know, extended classic senario is not supported in SUS, only the following senarios is supported.
1) SUS-SRM ( In this case, SRM should be local.)
2)SUS-MM(R/3) (Only separate ERP system)
Because, in extended (classic) , there're over ERP/EBP systems, when post confirmation, system might have problem,
Eventhough, some customers is using, but this senario is not supported and customer need modification to archive this.
The SUS-EBP (service procurement) and SUS-MM (plan driven procurement) can be used only separately but not mixed.
Does anybody have more inputs?
Regards
Lauren

SUS Scenarios

Hello Guys:
I am a little confused about all the different deployment scenarios when you integrate SRM with SUS, and I am not sure if you could help me to solve some questions I have
I have the requirement to be able to retrieve PO, POR, confirmations and Invoices from SUS to the backend for direct and indirect materials so what I understand is this:
If I implement the MM-SUS scenario I will be able to retrieve these documents from SUS directly to the backend system. but what happens with the requirements coming from EBP (Shopping Cart)?? can I implement also the EBP - SUS scenario in order to procure indirect materials and retrieve these documents to the backend?? the EBP should be in the classic or in the classic extended scenario?? I know the CES only support PO and POR collaboration and some enhancements need to be done for the rest of the documents, but I that means the classic scenario supports all the follow on documents (PO, POR, Confirmation and Invoice)?? Should I use the classic scenario for my EBP-SUS integration for the indirect materials and the MM-SUS for the direct ones in order to fulfill my requirement??
Hugo

Hi,
You need PI in ROS if you are using ROS in conjunction with SUS. Say after selecting a vendor you now want to do business with this vendor, so you will have to push him from SRM to SUS system. PI is needed for this push.
And yes for document exchange (PO/PO response/ASN/IV) between you and the supplier you need SUS
Regards,
Nikhil

MM-SUS Scenario: MM PO data transfered to SUS but SUS PO creation is fail

Hello All,
In case of MM-SUS scenario, when i created a MM PO and idoc data was sent to SUS, but in SUS transaction SXI_MONITOR i found that the line is scheduled instead of successfully status. In SMQ2 i found the error message: Storage form of product ID not yet defined in Cust omizing. As i know that in MM-SUS scenario, the material master is not needed to maintain in SUS. Please advise how to handle this trouble, thanks,
Best Regard
Joseph Chen

Hi Devi Swain,
Firstly thanks for your reply.
i have setted this configuration as you mentioned, and Prod.ID Lenth = 18, "Display leading zeros" and "save lexicographically" are not ticked. Then the new error message show:Prod.ID Lenth is longer than the customized setting.
By the way, MM material number lenth = 18
Best Regard
Joseph Chen

MM-SUS Scenario---Error while posting the PO in SUS System from R/3 system.

Hi All,
An error occurred within an XI interface: Exception occurred:BBP_PD:004 -Partner 0000003000 not found E:BBP_PD:147 -Enter a country for partner 0000003000 with type 'Sold-to Party' Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57
The above is problem occurred in SUS system. I have checked the message SXMb_MONI Tcode for XML message.
Can any one suggest what could be the problem and the solution for the same.
we are working on MM-SUS scenario (Plan Driven Procurement).
Thanks
Jagan

Hi
Please go through the links below ->
purchase order doesn't create in srm sus
purchase order not create in sus
Enter a country for partner with type 'Sold-to Party'
BBP_BUPA_SUPPLIER:101
Unable to determine logical system of sender
Help MM-SUS!
SUS-MM:PO not transferred to SUS--message:'sold to party'
Error in SUS PO creation
Re: PO error in SUS-MM Scenario
Cancellation from SUS hangs in XI interface
Regards
- Atul

MM-SUS scenario mapping of the Goodsreceipt for inbound delivery @SUS

Hi SRM gurus,
We are working on the MM-SUS scenario with SRM5.0 and ECC6.0 as the backend.
We are creating a goods receipt in the backend with respect to the inbounddelivery created from the ASN made at the SUS end.
But this goods receipt is not updated as the goods receipt in the SUS for that vendor.
Can anybody tell me how it is configured for the backend?
I could see a business object BUS2233 for the SUS confirmation transaction type as SUCF with the int.number range as 01 and the ext. number range as 02.
I am not sure where it is configured in MM. I could find one MM--> IM --> Define Number Assignment for Goods Receipt/Issue slips --> Number range grpg.code where there is an NO. rng.grpg.code and the Intern.number range as 01.
Is this the place we have the external number range as 01 which is maintained as internal in SUS BUS2233.
Any help in this regard.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Sridhar.
Edited by: P.T. Sridharbabu on Jan 31, 2008 4:57 AM

Hi All,
The report is running fine and could be able to generate the Idoc and sending it to the XI systems also. But our XI system is not able to post the same to the SUS system and is giving the following error :
The reference to a source object via the object number is different than the reference via the GUID Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_API; Include: LBBP_BD_APIF39; Line: 175
Any thoughts on this.
Shall I have to configure something in the SUS system for this report to capture there?
Or
Shall I have to configure something in the MM system ECC6.0 for this report to send it to XI correctly?
Thanks in advance.
Will be of most useful to us, if somebody throws some light on this.
Best regards,
Sridhar.

Roles for Contact Person in MM-SUS Scenario

Hi !
When we create a contact person using the Create user option in SUS, we assign the roles to the contact person. These roles are basically the standard SAP roles for SUS. We have created Z-roles ( a copy of the standard roles) to restrict cetain txns for users and would like to assign these Z-roles to the contact person . How can we ensure that the Z-roles are displayed instead of the standard roles ?
Regards

Hi
Please go through these complete SUS-MM Configuartion detail links, which will definitely help ->
Roles:
SAP deliver standard roles with authorisations, if You want to maintain your own go to transaction PFCG.
There are two type of role:
- single role
- composite role - (one or more single roles)
To roles You can assign transaction codes, reports, URL links, etc. SAP System automatically creates the authorisations that you can set on Authorisations tab page.
Authorisation:
Authorization profiles must be generated before you can assign them to users. An authorization is generated for each authorization level in the browser view, and an authorization profile for the whole role as represented in the browser view.
Re: Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario
Re: Cancellation from SUS hangs in XI interface
Re: Vendor Replication in SUS scenario
Re: SUS-MM for service items
Re: Central Person already exists
SUS and Central User Admin
Re: User roles.
Please look at following links for Roles and Authorizations 
Links for user roles:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/52/6714b6439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/42/271d24d86211d2961a0000e82de14a/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/e4/15e48efd6c11d296430000e82de14a/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/d3/559a4271c80a31e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/4e/52b74065448431e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
For profiles and authorisations:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/52/67151e439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/20/efcbfed8a511d397110000e82de14a/frameset.htm
Regards
- Atul

Goods receipt data from R/3 to SUS ( MM-SUS Scenario)

Hi !
In the MM-SUS scenario, we create an ASN in SUS and the system automatically creates an inbound delivery in the backend MM system.Now after we post a GR with reference to the Inbound delivery - can we send the GR data back to the SUS system. If yes - how do we do it ?
If the answer id no - I would like to understand the use of links available for Goods receipt on the SUS home page.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Manoj

Hi
Please go through the list of SAP Consulting OSS Notes, which will definitely answer your queries ->
Note 868192 - Consulting solution: SUS-MM (SUS-MMSRV) service procurement
Note 1028264 - Consulting solution: Additional function for SRM-SUS
Note 982871 - Consulting services: supplier integration in SRM
Note 1026638 - GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47-
Related Notes
Note 1064557 - SRM 6.0 SP02: Additional Notes to be applied on SRM Server
Note 995352 - SRM 6.0 SP Stack 01 (03/2007): Release Information Note
Please implement the following notes as applicable, if you use GR Notifications functionality in MM-SUS scenario:
Note 1028920: RPDODELVRY does not work when both PO and SAR are selected
Note 1026638: GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47-
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

MM-SUS Scenario - Issue in vendor replication

Hi Gurus,
We are implementing MM-SUS scenario on SRM 7.0 interacting with a system R/3 4.6C and NW PI 7.0.
Now we are workking on the vendor replication from R/3 by mean tx BD14. So we performed all neccesary configuration and functional steps on R/3 system and on SRM to be able to execute BD14
After execution we obtain messages about succesfully IDoc creation for vendor data transmission and we see in tx WE02 that everything was OK, current status=03 (data passed to port OK).
But when we login on SRM, we dont' found the correspondent business partner in tx. BP and neither his connection with central vendor group in tx PPOMV_BBP and user/password generation to be sended by automatic email to supplier.
Can anybody help me with this issue?.Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Horacio

Hi,
We have been investigated the issue and for some similar issues the procedure to
delete the entried in VENMAP table and after to do the replication again
have solved the issue.
The steps to delete the entry from VENMAP:
- Goto to transaction SE16
- Open 'VENMAP' table
- Type in the vendor number under 'VENDOR_NO' field, which you
   need to delete.
- Select the record and open in display mode (or just double
   click on the record)
- In the 'Table VENMAP Display' screen, on the transaction bar,
   type '/h' and press enter.
- Click on the screen and press enter.
- You will be in the debug mode. Change the 'code' value to 'DELE'.
- Press F8 and execute the program. Now you will find a 'Delete Entry'
   button.
- Click on the 'Delete Entry' button and remove the entry from VENMAP.
Once this is done, run BBPGETVD transaction and unset 'Address
Comparison to Identify Duplicates'.
We can do other test, Would it be possible to you enter the supplier
data to the BUT000 table manually for the currupted business Partener ?
Partner GUID, Partner can be taken from the VENMAP table.
Please test both procedure and update me if it solve the issue for
the Partner.
Please check the note 548862 FAQ: EBP user administration, topics 2
and 3 about how you can check all EBP users and about BUP_BUPA_DELETE.
We hope this information can help you.
Kind Regards,
Edel.

Error in invoice posting in MM-SUS scenario

Dear Experts,
I have configured MM-SUS scenario with SRM5.0, PI7.0 and ECC5.0. The invoice is coming from the SUS system but not getting posted in R/3 because of following error u201CA company code cannot be determined for LS SRM_V1u201D. (SRM_V1 is the vendor)
I have done following invoice settings as mentioned in config guide:
Tcode: OBCA
Partner Type: LS
Partner No.: SR5CLNT300 (SUS client)
Comp. code name in invoice: SRM & Company Ltd.
CoCd: SRM1 (company code maintained in R/3)
Tcode: OBCD
Partner Type Partner No.     Tax Type     Tx
LS        SR5CLNT300     V0     V0
LS        SR5CLNT300     V1     V1
LS        SR5CLNT300     V2     V2
LS        SR5CLNT300     V3     V3
LS        SR5CLNT300     V4     V4
LS        SR5CLNT300     V8     V8
LS        SR5CLNT300     V9     V9
Tcode: OMRY
Partn.Type: LS
Partner no.: SR5CLNT300
Company Code: SRM1
Invoice doc.type: RE
Cred.memo doc.type: RE
Any help in this regards will be appreciated.
Regards,
Ashish

The invoice was successfully posted. I have done 2 thing:
1) I got implemented User Exit: EXIT_SAPLMRMH_011 in Enhancement: MRMH0002
2) Maintained Transaction VS5 and G/L account no. for relevent chart of accounts in R/3 table T030K.

R/3(MM) -XI- SUS Scenario Error

Hello,
I'm working on SRM Integration: R/3(MM) to SUS Scenario
Whenever i post a PO message to SUS from R/3 (MM module), I see the following error in SXMB_MONI:
ERROR:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?> <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand=""><SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category><SAP:Code area="ABAP">APPLICATION_ERROR</SAP:Code><SAP:P1/><SAP:P2/><SAP:P3/><SAP:P4/><SAP:AdditionalText/><SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global">StandardMessageFault</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage><SAP:Stack>The application triggered an exception
</SAP:Stack><SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry></SAP:Error>
TRACE:
"An error occured within an XI interface: SLD system SNT_BS is not known Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1; Include: LBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1F1Y; Line:92 "
Can anyone help me resolve this problem ?
Thanks,
Regards,
Sridhar

Hi,
Thanks for the reply Vishnu. No i didn't create those OSS messages
I just now found the reason and resolved the problem.
Let me describe the reason for the problem:
In the SRM box, values for the "System Landscape Directory Names" (Business System Names) in the "Definition of backend systems in B2B" were not entered.
Txn : SPRO
SAP Reference IMG> Supplier Relationship Manager>Supplier Self Services>Technical Settings>Define Backend Systems.
Regards,
Sridhar

Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario

Hi !
We are planning to implement EBP-SUS and MM-SUS in one Client . Request you to help us on the following issues.
1. While the outbound messages will not have a problem from MM & EBP, how do we route inbound messages to MM & EBP effectively. Should be handle it in XI ?? If ues, what is the best criteria .
2. Since both the config guides for MM-SUS and EBP-SUS scenarios include transactions for transferring Vendor & Comapny Code data, how do we check duplication.For ex : if we transfer a Vendor from R/3 and subsequently try to transfer the same vendor from EBP , is there any inbuilt duplicate check ?
3. In MM-SUS, an ASN created in SUS creates an inbound delivery is created in MM. What would happen in case of EBP-SUS i.e when an ASN is created for an EBP PO ? We are on extended classic scenario ?
4.If you do a confirmation in EBP-SUS, will a GR be generated in both EBP and subsequently in MM.
Request yr help pl.
Regards

Hi
Welcome to world of SRM.
I guess, you must have got enough details in the SRM guides.
Anyways, better to understand the basics first,, before going in detail. I hope this will answer all your queries.
Refer to these links ->
Supplier Enablement
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cd/0e343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
SUS-EBP Scenario
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/06/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
SUS-MM Scenario
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/39/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Supplier Self-services
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/25/99b13c48740d55e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Procurement
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/8e/e5623c046a9b67e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Users in SRM user Management
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cd/6313513813554e941a02a91540c29e/frameset.htm
Please try this SAP OSS notes as well to get System architecture details->
Note 982871 - Consulting services: supplier integration in SRM
963000 - Usage and release of SRM as AddOn to ECC in ERP2005
868192 - Consulting solution: SUS-MM (SUS-MMSRV) service procurement
573383 - EBP and SUS deployment variants
Also do read this ->
Check whether the roles delivered by SAP meet your requirements. If not, you can create new roles and assign transactions to them. We recommend that you copy standard roles and tailor them to your requirements.
All users assigned to a respective role are then allowed to carry out the transactions. If required, you can refine the authorization check on the tab page Authorizations.
Standard SAP Single-roles
SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER (for purchasing administrators - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER (for bidders - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_DISPATCHER (for dispatchers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER (for invoicers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR (for order processors - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_MANAGER (for managers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_AGENT (for service agents - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
If you want to use SAP Supplier Self-Services, proceed as follows:
1. Select one of the following single roles:
SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER
SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_VENDOR
SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER
SAP_EC_SUS_DISPATCHER
SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER
SAP_EC_SUS_MANAGER
SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR
SAP_EC_SUS_PRODUCT_MANAGER
SAP_EC_SUS_SAR_PROCESSOR
SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_AGENT
SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_MANAGER
2. Choose Change Roles.
3. Choose the Personalization tab page.
Note: The personalization applies to all roles, meaning the user can also create his own roles, for example copying the delivered SAP SUS roles. He can tailor these roles to his requirements by changing the SUS-specific attributes (BBP_SUS_ROLE_ATTRIBUTES).
1. Select the entry BBP_SUS_ROLE_ATTRIBUTES (SUS-specific role attributes).
2. Choose Change values.
A dialog box for maintaining SUS-specific roles appears.
3. If required, perform the following steps:
If the role should be displayed in the SUS User Management (UM) and should be able to be assigned to the relevant user by the supplier administrator, set the indicator to display the role in SUS UM.
If the user should be displayed as a service agent for the purchaser, set the Service agent indicator.
If you want to define the user as an SRM administrator, set the SRM administrator indicator. The user is then authorized to change all supplier data.
If want to assign the role SUS administrator automatically to the user during registration, set the SUS administratorindicator.
Sets the relevant indicators if you want users to receive the following notifications: Notification If Purchase Order Not Opened, Notification If Purchase Order Response Is Missing, Notification If ASN Is Missing, Notification If ConfirmationIs Missing, Notification If Invoice Is Missing,
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

SUS Scenario Question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for