SUS Scenarios

Hello Guys:
I am a little confused about all the different deployment scenarios when you integrate SRM with SUS, and I am not sure if you could help me to solve some questions I have
I have the requirement to be able to retrieve PO, POR, confirmations and Invoices from SUS to the backend for direct and indirect materials so what I understand is this:
If I implement the MM-SUS scenario I will be able to retrieve these documents from SUS directly to the backend system. but what happens with the requirements coming from EBP (Shopping Cart)?? can I implement also the EBP - SUS scenario in order to procure indirect materials and retrieve these documents to the backend??  the EBP should be in the classic or in the classic extended scenario?? I know the CES only support PO and POR collaboration and some enhancements need to be done for the rest of the documents, but I that means the classic scenario supports all the follow on documents (PO, POR, Confirmation and Invoice)?? Should I use the classic scenario for my EBP-SUS integration for the indirect materials and the MM-SUS for the direct ones in order to fulfill my requirement??
Hugo

Hi,
You need PI in ROS if you are using ROS in conjunction with SUS. Say after selecting a vendor you now want to do business with this vendor, so you will have to push him from SRM to SUS system. PI is needed for this push.
And yes for document exchange (PO/PO response/ASN/IV) between you and the supplier you need SUS
Regards,
Nikhil

Similar Messages

  • MM-SUS Scenario: MM PO data transfered to SUS but SUS PO creation is fail

    Hello All,
    In case of MM-SUS scenario, when i created a MM PO and idoc data was sent to SUS, but in SUS transaction SXI_MONITOR i found that the line is scheduled instead of successfully status. In SMQ2 i found the error message: Storage form of product ID not yet defined in Cust omizing.  As i know that in MM-SUS scenario, the material master is not needed to maintain in SUS.  Please advise how to handle this trouble, thanks,
    Best Regard
    Joseph Chen

    Hi Devi Swain,
    Firstly thanks for your reply.
    i have setted this configuration as you mentioned, and Prod.ID Lenth = 18,  "Display leading zeros" and "save lexicographically" are not ticked.  Then the new error message show:Prod.ID Lenth is longer than the customized setting.
    By the way, MM material number lenth = 18
    Best Regard
    Joseph Chen

  • Few questions on EB-SUS scenario?

    Dear Experts,
    I have few questions on EB-SUS scenario which you may help with your expertise. It will be helpful for those who are new to scenario?
    1. EB (enterpise Buyer or SRM) -SUS scenario is used for requesting external staff? can it be used for non stock or free text items in extended classic? does it support direct material procurement ?
    2. Does EB-SUS or SRM-sus support service item with hierarchy like MM-SUS?
    3. EB-SUS scenario is basically on extended classic or standalone scenario? But, in extended classic scenario, it does support only Purchase order and PO response scenario? What badi's or customization is required to enable the confirmation and invoice for extended scenarios?
    Full marks for good answers !!!
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

    Hi,
    I am also interested in this question with another view of it:
    - Can SUS be used together with SRM (EB) for consumables in standalone scenario?
    - What are your experiences with SUS in general. I foresee that we would need some add-on development to the solution, is this easily done or does it take a lot of effort?
    Thanks for any good input
    Fredrik

  • Schedule lines tranfer from R/3 to SUS in a MM-SUS scenario

    Hi SRM gurus,
    We are working on the MM-SUS scenario where the scheduling agreement is created in the backend R/3 system. Delivery schedule lines are generated in the backend and transfered to the SUS thru. ME9E transaction for sending the delivery schedule to the SUS.
    We have a confirmation control key which guides us in SUS to create an ASN in the backend.
    Though there is a confirmation control key exist in the SA for that particular line item, when the ASN is sent from SUS to XI to R/3. There is an idoc error in the R/3 which says that there is no confirmation control key though it is there for the line item which is transfered to SUS.
    Now Pls. answer my questions :
    1) Will ME9E transfer the total lines in the SA or the schedule lines with the delivery schedules only ?
    2) Is it possible to resend the same schedule line ( with the updated delivery schedule) to the SUS as per the standard scenario?
    3) In the SUS how do we findout the materials corresponding to that particular delivery schedule line. Because in SUS the reference is only the scheduling agreement number as we could not see any scheduline line item.
    Pls. suggest.
    We are working on SRM(SUS) 5.0 with ECC6.0 as the backend.
    Best regards,
    Sridhar.

    i have seen the code --> where the FM is called for creation of SAR in SRM.
    that is FM
    BBP_SAPXML1_SUSPO_CREATE_IN --> in this --> search for this
    Call API
          IF ls_header-description EQ 'DELINS'.
            CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_API_SUSPO_CRT'
            EXPORTING
              is_header   = ls_header
              it_item     = lt_item
              it_attach   = lt_attach
              it_partner  = lt_partner
              it_longtext = lt_longtext
              it_tax      = lt_tax
              it_limit    = lt_limit
              it_sdln     = lt_sdln
            IMPORTING
              es_header   = ls_header_e
    this one creates ---> the SAR in SRM.
    and also i have seen further --> there is no place where any BADI is also called.
    i am afraid it is not possible to control what you want using BADI.
    only --> difference between --> New document and the old document is
    the Indicator --> C for create
    U for update.
    And Also if you can see the XML message for the updated document --> you can see all the lines in the XML message.
    Not the added lines...

  • MM-SUS Scenario---Error while posting the PO in SUS System from R/3 system.

    Hi All,
    An error occurred within an XI interface: Exception occurred:BBP_PD:004 -Partner 0000003000 not found E:BBP_PD:147 -Enter a country for partner 0000003000 with type 'Sold-to Party' Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57
    The above is problem occurred in SUS system. I have checked the message SXMb_MONI Tcode for XML message.
    Can any one suggest what could be the problem and the solution for the same.
    we are working on MM-SUS scenario (Plan Driven Procurement).
    Thanks
    Jagan

    Hi
    <b>Please go through the links below -></b>
    purchase order doesn't create in srm sus
    purchase order not create in sus
    Enter a country for partner with type 'Sold-to Party'
    BBP_BUPA_SUPPLIER:101
    Unable to determine logical system of sender
    Help MM-SUS!
    SUS-MM:PO not transferred to SUS--message:'sold to party'
    Error in SUS PO creation
    Re: PO error in SUS-MM Scenario
    Cancellation from SUS hangs in XI interface
    Regards
    - Atul

  • MM-SUS scenario mapping of the Goodsreceipt for inbound delivery @SUS

    Hi SRM gurus,
      We are working on the MM-SUS scenario with SRM5.0 and ECC6.0 as the backend.
    We are creating a goods receipt in the backend with respect to the inbounddelivery created from the ASN made at the SUS end.
    But this goods receipt is not updated as the goods receipt in the SUS for that vendor.
    Can anybody tell me how it is configured for the backend?
    I could see a business object BUS2233 for the SUS confirmation transaction type as SUCF with the int.number range as 01 and the ext. number range as 02.
    I am not sure where it is configured in MM. I could find one MM--> IM --> Define Number Assignment for Goods Receipt/Issue slips  --> Number range grpg.code where there is an NO. rng.grpg.code and the Intern.number range as 01.
    Is this the place we have the external number range as 01 which is maintained as internal in SUS BUS2233.
    Any help in this regard.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Sridhar.
    Edited by: P.T. Sridharbabu on Jan 31, 2008 4:57 AM

    Hi All,
    The report is running fine and could be able to generate the Idoc and sending it to the XI systems also. But our XI system is not able to post the same to the SUS system and is giving the following error :
    The reference to a source object via the object number is different than the reference via the GUID Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_API; Include: LBBP_BD_APIF39; Line: 175
    Any thoughts on this.
    Shall I have to configure something in the SUS system for this report to capture there?
    Or
    Shall I have to configure something in the MM system ECC6.0 for this report to send it to XI correctly?
    Thanks in advance.
    Will be of most useful to us, if somebody throws some light on this.
    Best regards,
    Sridhar.

  • Roles for Contact Person in MM-SUS Scenario

    Hi !
    When we create a contact person using the Create user option in SUS, we assign the roles to the contact person. These roles are basically the standard SAP roles for SUS. We have created Z-roles ( a copy of the standard roles) to restrict cetain txns for users and would like to assign these Z-roles to the contact person . How can we ensure that the Z-roles are displayed instead of the standard roles ?
    Regards

    Hi
    <u><b>Please go through these complete SUS-MM Configuartion detail links, which will definitely help  -></b></u>
    <u>Roles:</u>
    SAP deliver standard roles with authorisations, if You want to maintain your own go to transaction PFCG.
    There are two type of role:
    - single role
    - composite role - (one or more single roles)
    To roles You can assign transaction codes, reports, URL links, etc. SAP System automatically creates the authorisations that you can set on Authorisations tab page.
    <u>Authorisation:</u>
    Authorization profiles must be generated before you can assign them to users. An authorization is generated for each authorization level in the browser view, and an authorization profile for the whole role as represented in the browser view.
    Re: Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario
    Re: Cancellation from SUS hangs in XI interface
    Re: Vendor Replication in SUS scenario
    Re: SUS-MM for service items
    Re: Central Person already exists
    SUS and Central User Admin
    Re: User roles.
    <b>Please look at following links for Roles and Authorizations </b>
    <u>Links for user roles:</u>
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/52/6714b6439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/42/271d24d86211d2961a0000e82de14a/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/e4/15e48efd6c11d296430000e82de14a/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/d3/559a4271c80a31e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/4e/52b74065448431e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    <u>For profiles and authorisations:</u>
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/52/67151e439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/20/efcbfed8a511d397110000e82de14a/frameset.htm
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Goods receipt data from R/3 to SUS ( MM-SUS Scenario)

    Hi !
    In the MM-SUS scenario, we create an ASN in SUS and the system automatically creates an inbound delivery in the backend MM system.Now after we post a GR with reference to the Inbound delivery - can we send the GR data back to the SUS system. If yes - how do we do it ?
    If the answer id no - I would like to understand the use of  links available for Goods receipt on the SUS home page.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Manoj

    Hi
    <b>Please go through the list of SAP Consulting OSS Notes, which will definitely answer your queries -></b>
    Note 868192 - Consulting solution: SUS-MM (SUS-MMSRV) service procurement
    Note 1028264 - Consulting solution: Additional function for SRM-SUS
    Note 982871 - Consulting services: supplier integration in SRM
    Note 1026638 - GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47-
    Related Notes
    Note 1064557 - SRM 6.0 SP02: Additional Notes to be applied on SRM Server
    Note 995352 - SRM 6.0 SP Stack 01 (03/2007): Release Information Note
    Please implement the following notes as applicable, if you use GR Notifications functionality in MM-SUS scenario:
    Note 1028920: RPDODELVRY does not work when both PO and SAR are selected
    Note 1026638: GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47-
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • MM-SUS Scenario - Issue in vendor replication

    Hi Gurus,
    We are implementing MM-SUS scenario on SRM 7.0 interacting with a system R/3 4.6C and NW PI 7.0.
    Now we are workking on the vendor replication from R/3 by mean tx BD14. So we performed all neccesary configuration and functional steps on R/3 system and on SRM to be able to execute BD14
    After execution we obtain messages about succesfully IDoc creation for vendor data transmission and we see in tx WE02 that everything was OK, current status=03 (data passed to port OK).
    But when we login on SRM, we dont' found the correspondent business partner in tx. BP and neither his connection with central vendor group in tx PPOMV_BBP and user/password generation to be sended by automatic email to supplier.
    Can anybody help me with this issue?.Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Horacio

    Hi,
    We have been investigated the issue and for some similar issues the procedure to
    delete the entried in VENMAP table and after to do the replication again
    have solved the issue.
    The steps to delete the entry from VENMAP:
    - Goto to transaction SE16
    - Open 'VENMAP' table
    - Type in the vendor number under 'VENDOR_NO' field, which you
       need to delete.
    - Select the record and open in display mode (or just double
       click on the record)
    - In the 'Table VENMAP Display' screen, on the transaction bar,
       type '/h' and press enter.
    - Click on the screen and press enter.
    - You will be in the debug mode. Change the 'code' value to 'DELE'.
    - Press F8 and execute the program. Now you will find a 'Delete Entry'
       button.
    - Click on the 'Delete Entry' button and remove the entry from VENMAP.
    Once this is done, run BBPGETVD transaction and unset 'Address
    Comparison to Identify Duplicates'.
    We can do other test, Would it be possible to you enter the supplier
    data to the BUT000 table manually for the currupted business Partener ?
    Partner GUID, Partner can be taken from the VENMAP table.
    Please test both procedure and update me if it solve the issue for
    the Partner.
    Please check the note 548862 FAQ: EBP user administration, topics 2
    and 3 about how you can check all EBP users and about BUP_BUPA_DELETE.
    We hope this information can help you.
    Kind Regards,
    Edel.

  • Error in invoice posting in MM-SUS scenario

    Dear Experts,
    I have configured MM-SUS scenario with SRM5.0, PI7.0 and ECC5.0. The invoice is coming from the SUS system but not getting posted in R/3 because of following error u201CA company code cannot be determined for LS SRM_V1u201D. (SRM_V1 is the vendor)
    I have done following invoice settings as mentioned in config guide:
    Tcode: OBCA
    Partner Type: LS
    Partner No.: SR5CLNT300 (SUS client)
    Comp. code name in invoice: SRM & Company Ltd.
    CoCd: SRM1 (company code maintained in R/3)
    Tcode: OBCD
    Partner Type Partner No.     Tax Type     Tx
    LS        SR5CLNT300     V0     V0
    LS        SR5CLNT300     V1     V1
    LS        SR5CLNT300     V2     V2
    LS        SR5CLNT300     V3     V3
    LS        SR5CLNT300     V4     V4
    LS        SR5CLNT300     V8     V8
    LS        SR5CLNT300     V9     V9
    Tcode: OMRY
    Partn.Type: LS
    Partner no.: SR5CLNT300
    Company Code: SRM1
    Invoice doc.type: RE
    Cred.memo doc.type: RE
    Any help in this regards will be appreciated.
    Regards,
    Ashish

    The invoice was successfully posted. I have done 2 thing:
    1) I got implemented User Exit: EXIT_SAPLMRMH_011 in Enhancement: MRMH0002
    2) Maintained Transaction VS5 and G/L account no. for relevent chart of accounts in R/3 table T030K.

  • R/3(MM) -XI- SUS Scenario Error

    Hello,
    I'm working on SRM Integration: R/3(MM) to SUS Scenario
    Whenever i post a PO message to SUS from R/3 (MM module), I see the following error in SXMB_MONI:
    ERROR:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?><!-- Call Inbound Proxy --> <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand=""><SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category><SAP:Code area="ABAP">APPLICATION_ERROR</SAP:Code><SAP:P1/><SAP:P2/><SAP:P3/><SAP:P4/><SAP:AdditionalText/><SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global">StandardMessageFault</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage><SAP:Stack>The application triggered an exception
    </SAP:Stack><SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry></SAP:Error>
    TRACE:
    "An error occured within an XI interface: SLD system SNT_BS is not known Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1; Include: LBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1F1Y; Line:92 "
    Can anyone help me resolve this problem ?
    Thanks,
    Regards,
    Sridhar

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply Vishnu. No i didn't create those OSS messages
    I just now found the reason and resolved the problem.
    Let me describe the reason for the problem:
    In the SRM box, values for the "System Landscape Directory Names" (Business System Names) in the "Definition of backend systems in B2B" were not entered.
    Txn : SPRO
    SAP Reference IMG> Supplier Relationship Manager>Supplier Self Services>Technical Settings>Define Backend Systems.
    Regards,
    Sridhar

  • Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario

    Hi !
    We are planning to implement EBP-SUS and MM-SUS in one Client . Request you to help us on the following issues.
    1. While the outbound messages will not have a problem from MM & EBP, how do we route inbound messages to MM & EBP effectively. Should be handle it in XI ?? If ues, what is the best criteria .
    2. Since both the config guides for MM-SUS and EBP-SUS scenarios include transactions for transferring Vendor & Comapny Code data, how do we check duplication.For ex : if we transfer a Vendor from R/3 and subsequently try to transfer the same vendor from EBP , is there any inbuilt duplicate check ?
    3. In MM-SUS, an ASN created in SUS creates an inbound delivery is created in MM. What would happen in case of EBP-SUS i.e when an ASN is created for an EBP PO ? We are on extended classic scenario ?
    4.If you do a confirmation in EBP-SUS, will a GR be generated in both EBP and subsequently in MM.
    Request yr help pl.
    Regards

    Hi
    Welcome to world of SRM.
    I guess, you must have got enough details in the SRM guides.
    Anyways, better to understand the basics first,, before going in detail. I hope this will answer all your queries.
    <b>Refer to these links -></b>
    <u>Supplier Enablement</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cd/0e343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>SUS-EBP Scenario</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/06/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>SUS-MM Scenario</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/39/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>Supplier Self-services</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/25/99b13c48740d55e10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>Procurement</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/8e/e5623c046a9b67e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>Users in SRM user Management</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cd/6313513813554e941a02a91540c29e/frameset.htm</b>
    <b>Please try this SAP OSS notes as well to get System architecture details-></b>
    <u>Note 982871 - Consulting services: supplier integration in SRM
    963000 - Usage and release of SRM as AddOn to ECC in ERP2005
    868192 - Consulting solution: SUS-MM (SUS-MMSRV) service procurement
    573383 - EBP and SUS deployment variants</u>
    <b>Also do read this -></b>
    <u>Check whether the roles delivered by SAP meet your requirements. If not, you can create new roles and assign transactions to them. We recommend that you copy standard roles and tailor them to your requirements.
    All users assigned to a respective role are then allowed to carry out the transactions. If required, you can refine the authorization check on the tab page Authorizations.
    Standard SAP Single-roles
    SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER (for purchasing administrators - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER (for bidders - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_DISPATCHER (for dispatchers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER (for invoicers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR (for order processors - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_MANAGER (for managers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_AGENT (for service agents - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    If you want to use SAP Supplier Self-Services, proceed as follows:
    1. Select one of the following single roles:
    SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER
    SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_VENDOR
    SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER
    SAP_EC_SUS_DISPATCHER
    SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER
    SAP_EC_SUS_MANAGER
    SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR
    SAP_EC_SUS_PRODUCT_MANAGER
    SAP_EC_SUS_SAR_PROCESSOR
    SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_AGENT
    SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_MANAGER
    2. Choose Change Roles.
    3. Choose the Personalization tab page.
    Note: The personalization applies to all roles, meaning the user can also create his own roles, for example copying the delivered SAP SUS roles. He can tailor these roles to his requirements by changing the SUS-specific attributes (BBP_SUS_ROLE_ATTRIBUTES).
    1. Select the entry BBP_SUS_ROLE_ATTRIBUTES (SUS-specific role attributes).
    2. Choose Change values.
    A dialog box for maintaining SUS-specific roles appears.
    3. If required, perform the following steps:
    If the role should be displayed in the SUS User Management (UM) and should be able to be assigned to the relevant user by the supplier administrator, set the indicator to display the role in SUS UM.
    If the user should be displayed as a service agent for the purchaser, set the Service agent indicator.
    If you want to define the user as an SRM administrator, set the SRM administrator indicator. The user is then authorized to change all supplier data.
    If want to assign the role SUS administrator automatically to the user during registration, set the SUS administratorindicator.
    Sets the relevant indicators if you want users to receive the following notifications: Notification If Purchase Order Not Opened, Notification If Purchase Order Response Is Missing, Notification If ASN Is Missing, Notification If ConfirmationIs Missing, Notification If Invoice Is Missing,</u>
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • MM-SUS Scenario - BP Creation from MM with external number

    Hi Gurus,
    We are implementing MM-SUS scenario on landscape involving ECC 6.0 EHP5 and SRM 7.0 EHP1.
    In connection with Vendor transfer from ECC to SUS, We want to achieve that ECC vendor and SUS business partner (BP) have the same number (I E: vendor 300000 in ECC has BP 300000 in SUS)
    But in the tests we performed sending vendors executing on ECC tx BD14 (via PI system), SUS ever creates Business Partners with numbers from internal range in spite of we have available external number range.
    Can anyone tell me if is possible or SUS is able in standard way, receive a vendor xml message and perform BP creation with the same number (XML field <PartnerID>) sended from ECC.
    I appreciate any help of yours. Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Horacio Miranda

    Than you very much again Nikhil.
    Also SAP answered to us about this topic as how you did, and definetely is impossible manage in SUS same number for BPs as vendor number in ECC.
    Regards,
    Horacio Miranda

  • Problem in processing of SAR in MM-SUS scenario

    Hi,
    We have upgraded SRM4.0 to SRM 5.0 in MM-SUS scenario. We have a problem in processing of SAR list on the supplier logon portal.
    When we click on All SAR list on supplier home page to display the list of SARs its going in infinite loop and giving timeout error after 30mins. When we checked in transaction SM50, found that program is not able to read records from table BBP_PDVIEW_IAP.
    Number of entris in this table are 16lac.
    Can anybody suggest the probable reason and solution?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Prashant

    Hello,
    could you solve this issue? I just got the same problem.
    If you found a solution, please tell me how you dealt with.
    Did you change the Mappings in XI?
    Kind regards,
    Barbara

  • SUS Scheduling agreement - MM SUS Scenario

    Hi,
    In MM SUS scenario, we create Scheduling agreement and the delivery schedule will be released and schedule will be sent to SUS which is a standard functionality.
    But our requirement is to send the Scheduling agreement as whole..like we sned PO from MM to SUS. Does it work if I create a custom idoc message type similar to PO (orders) with proper segments relevant to Scheduling agreement and corresponding mapping with XML in SUS ?
    Has anybody worked on this kind of development? if yes please share some inputs.
    Appreciate any help
    Regards
    Kiran

    Hi Abhishek,
    we don't want to change the idoc type: we would like to know if is correct to configure idoc DESADV for ASN created on SUS from a scheduling agreement release...because the idoc DESADV is not registered on ECC6 because of the error mentioned in my first post.
    Anyway, the note you suggested is referred to software components that differ from ours.
    Thanks for suggestion.
    Francesca

  • MM SUS scenario

    Hi ALL,
    We are implementing EP-MM-XI-SUS scenario and for this we have couple of requirement :
    1. How to populate payment term text which is there in MM PO , tax information on SUS PO screen.
    2. Also, we need to disable reject button and reject link on SUS PO screen.
    How can we achieve this.
    Regards
    Ashish

    1) payment terms and tax information comes from the Purchase ordr created in MM system.
    2) If you want to disable reject button ---> you have to go in for changes in the standard system ( as this is not possible using any BADI).
    all the user who have the SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR role will have ability to reject and accept in SUS PO

Maybe you are looking for

  • Should I be able to use my Vision:M when it's docked/connected via U

    I recently got a Vision:M, and when I was initially charging it using the included USB cable, it worked fine. Once I installed the software and transferred files,it stopped reacting to any key presses while connected to USB. It will receive files, bu

  • Broadcast Event to all objects

    I'd like to broadcast an event to all loaded modules. If I understand bubbling correctly events can bubble up, but not across. Lets say that a user logs out of the application. How do I pass this "event" to all loaded modules.

  • Publish Cordova App

    Hello, I have made an app and I am trying to publish it in the Windows Phone Dev Center. Now after many hours I'm stuck with the error: "The package identity associated with this update doesn't match what's in the uploaded package: "DoMoControl". The

  • To retreive Excise Invoice No in Dunning SAPSCRIPT Program(F150)

    Dear Friends, My requirement is to retrieve excise invoice number-> J_1IEXCHDR-EXNUM, instead of MHND-BELNR in dunning (F150) program. I customized the sap script program-> F150_BE_DUNN_01 and try the logic. Note: In Standard SAP script Program MHND-

  • Illustrator CS4 restarts itself immediately after I quit it

    This happens pretty much every time I quit Illustrator. So I'd like to find a remedy. I'm running OS X.5.4 on a new iMac 3.06 GHz Dual with 4GB RAM Illustrator CS4 v14.0.0.