SVHC checks not executing for pure substance

When checked for REACH SVHC for the Vend substances, check results shows as Compliance not ascertainable and calculated compliance status differs from existing status. These Vend substances have a DCT pulled in the production system and do not have any SVHC.
getting Errors like
Compliance data for product is missing from supplier
Speccification is not a ascertainable because of deeper level of product structure.
Calculated compliance status differs from existing status.
Kindly help
Ismail

Dear Anshul
SAP is using at many places "identification listings" of different kind. E.g. for hit list, for composition/spec listing, hazard inducer etc.purposes. For DG filling in most cases a different ident listing is used. Now it depends on how do you use SAP. There is a "standard" ident. listing to be used for DG purposes; you need therefore to compare the different ident listings and may be adapt the set up.
Any SAP standard is starting with "D_" in customizing (e.g. D_HITLIST etc.):
C.B.
PS: e.g. check: Identification Listing
Error in DG Filling
https://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/03/34981109d311d286e6080009b98822/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/EHSDGP/LOEHSDGP.pdf

Similar Messages

Depreciation is not executed for last month and the period is closed. Giving Error in this Dep. Cycle.

Hi All,
We had a month End scenario where the depreciation for a company code is not executed for the last month and closed the period without checking it.
While running the Depreciation posting for this month we encounted a error that last motn period is closed. Can we do the depreciation without opening the period closed. Kindly let us know the options available.
Regards,
Lakshmi Narayana

Lakshmi,
There is no way you can post depreciation without opening the prior periods. Please discuss with your business and secure all necessarry approval, I believe the business has a process on this kind of situations. As long as it is fully documented, auditors will not find it wrong.
This is the best time to improve your process, think of possible ways so that business will not forget to post depreciation (e.g send automatic email during 3 days before, 2 days before., 1 day before and during the day of depreciation run).
Hope this helps.
Thanks!
Jhero

"Prodcut allocation check not allowed for ATPcat.'BR' and application".

SAP Experts,
Whenever, I delete a delivery, I am seeing a pop-up message with the information message as "Prodcut allocation check not allowed for ATPcat.'BR' and application". Is this a standard functionality. We dont have ATP Check/Allocation check during delivery delete. How come we get this message ?
This is something curious. Can someone help me on this please ??
Thanks,
Babu Kilari

Delete the ATP category BR from check control for A (Sales document). It seems when you are deleting a delivery the transfer of requirements settings pop this
Let me know if you are successful
Regards,
Loknath

SD- Sales Order - ATP check not working for few item in same sales order

Hi Experts,
Need help we activated ATP check but for few item i could not find confirmation qty after availability check. In same SO out of 4 items for schedule line it confirming qty for 2 item but it's not confirming for remaining 2 items though stock is available. Please guide me how to correst and what need to check.
Manoj

Dear Manoj,
As you know, ATP is a big subject & some times its difficult to point the exact problem.
In your case, I suggest you to execute the function module:BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY using Tx:SE37
key in selection criteria , in results check the "ATPQTY"- it will show you how much actual stock is available for use i.e. ATP qtty.
still if you find the availability & system not confirming the qtty, then problem could be in checking rule
Tx:OVZ9 check in relevant combination, whether you are considering RLT or not?
is this case with MTS or MTO
because in Sales order -
for MTS - checking rule "A" & MTO checking rule will be "AE"
Regards,
Reazuddin MD

Budget check not active for commitment & actual budget

Budget check runs fine while checking budget limits for Production order and vendor invoices i.e does not allow to further create production order and vendor invoices if budget limits exceeds the released budget.
But this budget check does not work on procurement processes ( PR, PO &GR).
No warning or error message pop out and the system allows to further create PR/PO/GR beyond released budget
What config changes are required to make budget check active for procurement processes.

Hi vishal,
Check the Transcation groups in Budget tolerance limits.
PScostsbudget---define tolerance limits.
If you assign ++ All Activity groups it will activate the Budget avaliability control for all Transcation.
Check the avaliability control in OPS9 whether the activation type is 1 or 2 . If 2 run the avliability control CJBN.
Hope this will helpful,
Regards,

OAF : LOV mappings do not execute for specified default value in the LOV

Dear All,
I know the topic of default value in an LOV has been discussed a million times.
Please bear with me -
I set the "Initial Value" property for an LOV to populate a default value in the LOV field when the page loads. This works fine
My LOV has about 4 lov mappings that populate 4 "formValue" items on my page.
However, for the default value, these mappings are not executed and the formValue items remain empty. (Though the default value shows up fine on the screen)
Do I have to explicitly default these formValue items as well ? Is there anyway to get the mappings to execute ?
Thanks,
Gagan

Anyone ?

Requested auto spell check not worked for months - gmail uses Firefox's

Tools Advanced setting is on auto spell check but has not worked for months - yes it had worked, probably for years. Looking at gmail for an auto spell checker I see that it leaves that to one's browser - Firefox.

Your More system details list doesn't show the en-GB dictionary.
If you do not have the en-US locale then check that you have a dictionary installed (Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) and selected.
You can see which dictionary is selected if you right-click in a text area and open the Languages submenu.<br />
Also make sure that [X]"Check Spelling" in the right-click context menu has a tick.<br />
You can also try to toggle the "Check Spelling" item off and on again.
See:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Spell_checking
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Dictionaries
You can look here for more dictionaries:
* https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/language-tools/

Designer 9i - nested DDL structure not executable for XML

To support an XML data transfer, we need to define types,collections, and tables. When we define a table that references types and collections, we do not get adequate DDL from Designer 9i that identifies all of the nested structures, and the DDL that is generated is not executable. We can manually type the DDL and specify the appropriate nesting. We have done that, executed that successfully. We have then reverse engineered this table into Designer 9i, and requested DDL from it. The resulting DDL is not executable. Has anyone run into this problem?

Designer 9i does not support these complex datatypes, hence your errors.
Regards
Sue

Exit for batch no check not fired for Tr MFBF

hi. experts,
i'm new to abap.
i've to check the manually entered BATCH No. entered in Tr. MFBF and accordingly throw a error message for wrong entry on the first screen.
for this m using the exit SAPLV1ZE and its Function module EXIT_SAPLV01Z_004.
i've created a project in Tr. CMOD and have assigned this exit. also i've created the include given inside the function module. i've activated all.
But while i set a breakpoint there and try executing the transaction, the transaction doesnot stop at the specified break-point in debugger and hence the message doesnot get fired.
Plz help as to why the exit is not fired and why it doesnot stop in the debugger.

try this XMRM0001 enhance ment in smod for mfbf.
NB : activate all the things.
regards
shiba dutta

Availability Check not working for Item Cat TANN or YG05 in Btch Split

Currently working on implementing Automatic Batch Determination (BD) project and one fine piece is holding up the implementation (make or break for project).
In our QA System:
- In inventory we have a quantity of 2 for a material: 1 in one batch and 1 in another batch.
- Create an order with 2 line items with the same material number for a quantity of 1 each. Line item category is TANN
- When you generate the delivery the batch determination causes the items to split (even though you have a quantity of 1 in the line item).
- When you go into the delivery and open up the 1st line item and look at the 900001 line, BD chooses the 1st batch for a quantity of 1. Line item category is YG05.
- When you open up the 2nd line item and look at the 900002 line, BD chooses the 1st batch again, NOT the 2nd batch which it should.
If I change the line item category on the Sales Order to TAN and generate the delivery, BD correctly assigns the 1st batch to the 900001 line item and the 2nd batch to the 900002 line item. Which is correct.
Now for the strange part. The TANN item category and BD works find in our DEV Sandbox, but NOT in our QAS system.
I have spent two days now trying to find out where Availability Check is assigned specifically to Item Categories and any differences between our DEV Sandbox and our QA systems to no avail.
Our customers need the ability to be able to put the same material number on multiple lines of a sales order due to special pricing per customer within an order.
Can anyone direct me to some configuration or transaction that controls Availability Checking by Item Category. I have checked the 0VLP transaction and they are identical between our DEV and QA system for the TANN and YG05 categories.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.

In VOV6 the 'CP' Schedule Line Cat. has the Availability flag check. There were a few areas where I found an "Availability" flag and made sure there were all set.
But, I did finally find out what the error was:
Logistics Exec -> Shipping -> Basic Shipping Functions -> Avail Check and Transfer of Requirements -> Transfer of Requirements -> Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transactions
There are entries by Item Category. For
I/C = TANN
MRP type = PD
the Requirement Type was missing (if you look at the entry for TAN/PD you see an 11 in the RqTy column).
So I entered a 11 (Delivery Requirement) into the field and now the Availability Check works and I am getting the correct Batches and quantities during Batch Determination.
There is no entry for the YG05 batch split, so I guess the system just uses the Item Category of the main line item.
Thanks for the responses. Sorry to bother you I should have figured this out earlier.
Scott.

Credit Check not occurring for Customer with Partial Credit limit existing

Hi,
I have a scenario
1) where, if credit limit is crossed, then on creation of order I get an credit check even when i have not entered materials in sales order.
2) Partial Credit limit is pending (for e.g Credit limit of 100, 50 is still pending) when i create a new order with unconfirmed quantity, for amount 100, there is no credit check happening. (system should give message for extra amount 50)
Can I please get guidance on this issue.(2nd point)
Thanks & Regards,
Ganesh.

HI Ganesh,
Your issue is not clear. What do you mean by
2) Partial Credit limit is pending (for e.g Credit limit of 100, 50 is still pending) when i create a new order with unconfirmed quantity, for amount 100, there is no credit check happening. (system should give message for extra amount 50)
Please explain clearly
Thanks
Jobi

CRM Availability Check not working for certain Item Category

Hi there,
I have a situation where for certain order type/item category combinations, the availability check on the same material is not working.
The check is set up to happen in SAP ECC.
I have checked the config. under SPRO->CRM->Basic Functions->Availability Check->Availability Check using SAP ECC
as per many SDN posts on this, and everything looks fine.
The new item category, which was a copy of an existing one, works (i.e. gives availability) for certain order types, but not others.
If I create the same order directly in ECC, it works correctly every time.
I searched the code (from consultants who set it up originally) and can see nothing specific to the order type/ item category.
I also put a breakpoint on AVAILABILTY_CHECK function module in SAP ECC - it is not being hit, in the case where check is not successful.
Breakpoints in MV45AFZZ (Sales Order userexit) also not being hit, but they are hit for the Order/item category combination when it works successfully.
Any suggestions on where else this could be configured would be appreciated!
thanks,
David

Hi David,
One 'simple' reason for this could be that the copied item category does not have the
ATP Profile set up in the item category in the IMG. Make sure you have an ATP profile assigned in the area 'ATP Profile' in the item category.
Please see as well the SCN Wiki link:
Availability Check CRM-BTX-BF-ATP - CRM - SCN Wiki
Best regards
Christophe

Query not executing for one particular value

Hi
I have query on multi provider. and this multi provider is combination of Info objects only but not any ODS or cubes. I have one key figure in this multi provider.while executing the query i need to give input for variabl which has 7 different values. Query is executing fine for 6 values but not for one particular value.
query executed in listcube transaction and it is executed fine here for the same selection. then what might be the reason?
Please advise as soon as possible.
Thanks

Hi Kiran,
are you maintaining any filters in the query? or is there any logic in the exit for this variable.
regards.

VAT Reg number check not working for EU

Dear All,
Our countru is a member of EU and all the country wise checks for VAT number are activated. However when i try to save a GB vat number in a vendor master which has country code FI, I expect the system to throw an error stating that country of vendor does not match with VAT reg numbver.
However such a things does not happen and system is saving the GB vat code for FI vendor
PLease help
Pooja

In 4.7, we get message AR191 when we are trying to assign a GB VAT number in LFA1-STCEG for a supplier in country FI.
This is checked in function EU_TAX_NUMBER_CHECK with code:
* ------ Länderkennzeichen korrekt ?------------------------------------
      check_number_save = eu_tax_number.
      IF t005-pruin <> space.
        country_code = check_number_save(2).
        IF t005-intca NE 'GR ' AND country_code NE t005-intca OR
            t005-intca EQ 'GR ' AND country_code NE 'EL'.
          MESSAGE e191 WITH country_code RAISING not_valid.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.

EventHandler not executes for more of an user

Hi Guys,
I have three eventhandlers Post-Process, generator user login, associate the user manager and changer user status, from OIM 11g. When executes my HR reconciliation, and exists a new user to be created, is executed all eventhandlers normally, but when exists more than one user to be created, is executed all eventhandlers but only the creates user login isn't executed.
In my config eventhandlers, this eventhandlers is in order 1000.
Someone know me speak how resolve this issue?
Thanks

Hi Kevin,
I used the same structure in all the java class. Below is the my bulkevent code, for you try help me indentify something wrong:
public BulkEventResult execute(long l, long l1,
BulkOrchestration bulkOrchestration){
tcUserOperationsIntf userOperationsService = Platform.getService(tcUserOperationsIntf.class);
logger.warn("CreateUserLogin.execute BulkEventResult");
HashMap parameters = bulkOrchestration.getParameters();
logger.warn("Parameters.BulkEventResult " + parameters);
String operation = bulkOrchestration.getOperation();
logger.warn("PostProcess Operation " + operation);
String lastName = (parameters.get("Last Name") instanceof ContextAware)
? (String) ((ContextAware) parameters.get("Last Name")).getObjectValue()
: (String) parameters.get("Last Name");
String firstName = (parameters.get("First Name") instanceof ContextAware)
? (String) ((ContextAware) parameters.get("First Name")).getObjectValue()
: (String) parameters.get("First Name");
String fullName = (parameters.get("Nome Completo") instanceof ContextAware)
? (String) ((ContextAware) parameters.get("Nome Completo")).getObjectValue()
: (String) parameters.get("Nome Completo");
String cpf = (parameters.get("CPF") instanceof ContextAware)
? (String) ((ContextAware) parameters.get("CPF")).getObjectValue()
: (String) parameters.get("CPF");
String role = (parameters.get("Role") instanceof ContextAware)
? (String) ((ContextAware) parameters.get("Role")).getObjectValue()
: (String) parameters.get("Role");
String loginRecon = (parameters.get("User Login") instanceof ContextAware)
? (String) ((ContextAware) parameters.get("User Login")).getObjectValue()
: (String) parameters.get("User Login");
if (fullName == null || fullName.isEmpty()){
fullName = firstName.trim()+" "+lastName.trim();
String nome = fullName.substring(0,fullName.indexOf(" "));
String sobrenome = fullName.substring(fullName.indexOf(" ") +1,fullName.length());
sobrenome = sobrenome.replaceAll(" ", " ");
sobrenome = sobrenome.replaceAll(" ", " ");
if (loginRecon.equals(cpf)){
try{
boolean valido = false;
int tentativa = 1;
int sequencia =1;
String login = null;
String iTResourceName = getLookup().getDecodedValueForEncodedValue("Lookup.xxx.Customization","ADITResourceName");
String criar_email = getLookup().getDecodedValueForEncodedValue("Lookup.xxx.Customization","Criar_email");
logger.warn("Atributo ADITResourceName = "+iTResourceName);
logger.warn("Atributo Criar_email = "+criar_email);
while (!valido) {
logger.warn("TENTATIVA ("+tentativa+")");
login = GeraLogin(nome, sobrenome, tentativa, sequencia);
HashMap<String, String> validalogin = new HashMap<String, String>();
validalogin.put("usr_udf_login", login);
tcResultSet valida = userOperationsService.findUsers(validalogin);
if (valida.getRowCount() > 0){
valido = false;
tentativa++;
if (tentativa > 3){
sequencia++;
else{
logger.warn("Verificando existencia do login "+login+" no Active Directory");
String retAD= ValidaLoginAD(login,iTResourceName);
if (retAD.equals("Existe")){
valido = false;
tentativa++;
if (tentativa > 3){
sequencia++;
else{
valido = true;
HashMap<String, Object> mapAttrs = new HashMap<String, Object>();
if (criar_email.toLowerCase().equals("yes")){
String email = login+"@xxx.com";
mapAttrs.put("Email", email);
mapAttrs.put("Login de Rede", login);
getEntityManager().modifyEntity(bulkOrchestration.getTarget().getType(), bulkOrchestration.getTarget().getEntityId(), mapAttrs);
else{
mapAttrs.put("Login de Rede", login);
getEntityManager().modifyEntity(bulkOrchestration.getTarget().getType(), bulkOrchestration.getTarget().getEntityId(), mapAttrs);
}catch (Exception e) {
logger.error(e.getMessage());
e.printStackTrace();
else{
logger.warn("No generate "+loginRecon);
return new BulkEventResult();
Thanks a lot

SVHC checks not executing for pure substance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for