[svn] 640: Removing unnecessary dependencies on ant-contrib; we no longer have any need for it.

Revision: 640
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-02-23 16:44:05 -0800 (Sat, 23 Feb 2008)
Log Message:
Removing unnecessary dependencies on ant-contrib; we no longer have any need for it.
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/tests/checkinapp/build.xml
flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/modules/compiler/build.xml

My daughter has had her Razr for about 9 months now. About two weeks ago she picked up her phone in the morning on her way to school when she noticed two cracks, both starting at the camera lens. One goes completely to the bottom and the other goes sharply to the side. She has never dropped it and me and my husband went over it with a fine tooth comb. We looked under a magnifying glass and could no find any reason for the glass to crack. Not one ding, scratch or bang. Our daughter really takes good care of her stuff, but we still wanted to make sure before we sent it in for repairs. Well we did and we got a reply from Motorola with a picture of the cracks saying this was customer abuse and that it is not covered under warranty. Even though they did not find any physical damage to back it up. Well I e-mailed them back and told them I did a little research and found pages of people having the same problems. Well I did not hear from them until I received a notice from Fed Ex that they were sending the phone back. NOT FIXED!!! I went to look up why and guess what there is no case open any more for the phone. It has been wiped clean. I put in the RMA # it comes back not found, I put in the ID #, the SN# and all comes back not found. Yet a day earlier all the info was there. I know there is a lot more people like me and all of you, but they just don't want to be bothered so they pay to have it fix, just to have it do it again. Unless they have found the problem and only fixing it on a customer pay only set up. I am furious and will not be recommending this phone to anyone. And to think I was considering this phone for my next up grade! NOT!!!!

Similar Messages

How can I remove unread messages when I know I don't have any?

How can I remove "unread messages" when I know I do not have any?

Hit the num lock button again. Num lock forces only the numeric keypad underlying keys to work as a numeric keypad, and the rest of the keyboard won't work. Unfortunately Apple stopped including the numeric keypad hidden keyboard key labels on its keyboards. They used to include them. They are known as mouse keys: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.5/en/cdb_moskys.html

HT1420 how to remove an old authorized computer that i no longer have access to

Hello
I want to sync my iphone to my pc, but its telling me that i can't because this pc is not authorized and i'm only able to authorize 5 pc's but i only have 3 and one i them (the one i want to use) is not authorized, so how do i deauthorize any old pc's that i had in the past

You can deauthorize all computers linked to your account once a year from the Store Account window. Then you would just authorize the new computer again.
Check this Apple article out for more info -> iTunes Store: About authorization and deauthorization

[svn:osmf:] 17930: 1. Remove unnecessary logic from MulticastNetLoader.as

Revision: 17930
Revision: 17930
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-09-29 10:53:59 -0700 (Wed, 29 Sep 2010)
Log Message:
1. Remove unnecessary logic from MulticastNetLoader.as
2. Fix FM-1072
3. Fix FM-1081
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM-1072
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM-1081
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/elements/AudioElement.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/elements/LightweightVideoElement.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/MulticastNetLoader.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/NetStreamPlayTrait.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/elements/TestLightweightVideoElement.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/net/TestNetStreamPlayTrait.as

Repo URL has changed. Please update!
bump for update. changelog:
Revision 1:
qt-copy-svn: Fixed pkgconfig path in qt4 profile, svn update
strigi-svn: svn update
Added: rasqal, raptor (needed for soprano)
soprano-svn: Rebuilt against raptor/rasqal, svn update
kdelibs4-svn: svn update
kdepimlibs4-svn: svn update, cmake path was broken, fix required
kdebase4-svn: svn update
kdeartwork4-svn: svn update, force install to overwrite icons
kdeaccessibility-svn: svn update
kdeadmin4-svn: svn update
kdegames4-svn: svn update
Added: poppler-0.5.9, ghostscript-gpl (for kdegraphics4-svn)
kdegraphics4-svn: svn update
kdemultimedia4-svn: svn update, built against new poppler and gs-gpl
telepathy-qt-svn: svn update
tapioca-qt-svn: svn update
decibel-svn: svn update
qca-svn: svn update
kdenetwork4-svn: svn update
kdetoys4-svn: svn update
kdeutils4-svn: svn update
kdesdk4-svn: svn update
kdewebdev-svn: svn update
Added koffice-svn
amarok2-svn: svn update
did not build:
kdeedu4-svn: problems with testing for python boost (need to check the cmake test)
kdevelop-svn: problems finding kdedevmacros in cmake
Last edited by tardo (2007-06-06 22:53:49)

[svn:bz-trunk] 21002: Clean up build. xml and remove unnecessary delete task in the jar target.

Revision: 21002
Revision: 21002
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-03-31 09:47:04 -0700 (Thu, 31 Mar 2011)
Log Message:
Clean up build.xml and remove unnecessary delete task in the jar target.
Checkin tests passed.
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/core/build.xml
    blazeds/trunk/modules/proxy/build.xml
    blazeds/trunk/modules/remoting/build.xml

Well obviously it is an Ant build.
It looks to just compile/build a web application into a war so you can deploy it where you want to.
You don't need to edit it every time you are making a new page. It should work for any generic struts web application laid out in the fashion it expects.
Cheers,
evnafets

[svn:osmf:] 9163: Remove unnecessary libs reference.

Revision: 9163
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-08-06 17:31:50 -0700 (Thu, 06 Aug 2009)
Log Message:
Remove unnecessary libs reference.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/akamai/PluginTest/.actionScriptProperties

Hi,
Thanks. That worked out perfectly.
Now I have errors in OSMF integration tests.
The reports shows this -
testParseF4M
Failure
Timeout reached before event.
Timeout reached before event.
at org.flexunit::Assert$/fail()
at org.osmf.elements.f4mClasses::TestMultiLevelManifestParser/handleTimeout()
at Function/http://adobe.com/AS3/2006/builtin::apply()
at org.flexunit.internals.runners.statements::ExpectAsync/protect()
at org.flexunit.internals.runners.statements::ExpectAsync/handleAsyncTimeOut()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
at org.flexunit.async::AsyncHandler/handleTimeout()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
at flash.utils::Timer/tick()
12.638
testParseMultiLevelF4M
Failure
Timeout reached before event.
Timeout reached before event.
at org.flexunit::Assert$/fail()
at org.osmf.elements.f4mClasses::TestMultiLevelManifestParser/handleTimeout()
at Function/http://adobe.com/AS3/2006/builtin::apply()
at org.flexunit.internals.runners.statements::ExpectAsync/protect()
at org.flexunit.internals.runners.statements::ExpectAsync/handleAsyncTimeOut()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
at org.flexunit.async::AsyncHandler/handleTimeout()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
at flash.utils::Timer/tick()
1.615
I am not sure how to proceed from here.
Please help me out.
Thanks!

Remove unnecessary SD orders in SCM system

Hello,
To remove unnecessary Sales Orders regularly in SCM system I found out a program "/SAPAPO/SDORDER_DEL ". But I am unable to figure out the parameters to be used once I execute this program. Can someone please let me know, if there is a document which explains the fields in the tab of the program /SAPAPO/SDORDER_DEL :
1. Delete on database
2. Delete in SAP livecache and in Database
3. Delete All DB Sales order data
Suggestions are much appreciated.
Thanks

HI,
This is the Program Documentation available in system
Short text
ATP: Delete (SD) Orders From Database
Purpose
You use this report to delete the SD sales document data from the database. Normally, the order data remains in the database (it is not deleted as in liveCache).
In order to limit the data volume, you should schedule the report to delete the orders, if necessary, and it should be dependent on the lifetime of your orders.
Example
For example, a sales order is completed in six weeks. Such a sales order would be archived in SAP R/3 but such an archiving concept does not exist in SAP APO. You use this report to remove the sales order from the database.
Integration
A location product or a location can only be deleted if SD sales documents for this location product no longer exist in the database (that is, if, for example, no more entries exist in the tables /SAPAPO/ORDADM_I or /SAPAPO/ORDPART).
Features
A check is normally carried out before an order is deleted to see if this order still exists in liveCache. If this is the case, the order is not deleted.
You can also print out a list of the orders that cannot be deleted if you have set the relevant indicator.
In exceptional cases, you can deactivate this check and nevertheless still delete the selected orders.
If you have set the Delete all orders indicator, the order data from the database is completely deleted without any check. You should take great care when using this function.
Note
If you have deleted orders that are still being used for business purposes, you must start a new initial data supply or, if you know the orders, you must perform a further ATP check to transfer the data from SAP R/3 to SAP APO.

Remove unnecessary field in Web UI - not applied

Hello, dear Experts!
I'm trying to remove unnecessary fields from contact view page in Web UI.
I performed the following steps:
1. created new config role key ZTMP
2. created new business role and binded it with my config role key
3. bound business role in organizational structure
4. copied <default> configuration in BSP Workbench for my new ZTMP role key (BP_CONT/ContactDetails view)
5. removed unnecessary fields in my copied configuration and saved all
But after this steps no changes affected in Web UI - fields not removed, it's looks like default config. Same result for BP_HEAD/AccountDetails.
Technical data for contact page (when i press F2 in contact page):
Role Key (Searched For) - ZTMP
Role Key (Found) - ZTMP
Comp.Usage (Searched For) - Overview
Component Usage (Found) - <DEFAULT>
Object Type (Searched For) - <DEFAULT>
Object Type (Found) - <DEFAULT>
Maybe some "checkbox" blocks my config?

hi,
Procedure to change config is
1) Create role config key.
2) Assign it to your bussiness role.
3) Open found config.
4) Copy config and give your role config key. Do requried changes. Save it.
5) Write required code in do_config_determination if your config is not called.
Procedure that you are telling is correct and configuration found is ztmp, def, def. What is subobj type found? if it is default, again see configuration and compare with fields that you are getting on screen. May be you forgot to save because you have covered all the steps.
Best regards
Pankaj Kumar

Does ASC 2 remove unnecessary activation objects?

The release notes for ASC 2 say: "Reduces function overhead by removing unnecessary activation records. "
Does this actually happen? Can someone give a code example that shows this?
I've tried the braindead cases where you'd think this would happen (empty with, empty anonymous function, empty try), but the resulting bytecode doesn't seem to show this optimization. I'm using the optimize and remove-dead-code flags.
Am I missing something obvious? I'm sure I'm using ASC 2, because I can put code above a package block.

Activation objects should no longer be generated for a try/catch (empty or not). I just tried out a simple example, and ASC2 did not generate an activation object for the method containing the code:
try{x = 10;}
catch(e){print(e)}
How are you testing if the activation object is present? Do you have some sample try/catch code that is generating an activation object that you could post?
Activation objects are still generated for 'with' and nested functions, so if you have one of those in your method you will still see the activation object.

What is a good utility for removing unnecessary files and freeing up space on a MB disk?

Does anyone have a recommendation for a utility to free-up storage on the MBP HDD by listing files that are duplicates, temporary, or that are no longer required by the current configuration?

Good software, and good suggestion.
You may find, however, that removing dupiicate and unnecessary files reaches a point of diminishing returns. The average user will reclaim only a few gigs of extra space, at best. '
Your best strategy will be to aggressively delete or archive space consuming media files; a complementary approach woud be to increase your HD space by either getting a bigger HD, or investing in an extra drive. Prices are very good, and several manufacterers offer reliable devices. I have three, which may also serve as backup devices.
Post in this thread if have additional questions!

Class dependencies with Ant?

The "Show Dependencies" functionality for Java classes doesn't work because I use Ant as the build system:
Message
showDeps.ShowDepsNoDepBuildSystem: Cannot show dependencies as the projects build system does not support this.
Cause
The build system for the project (e.g. Ant) you are using does not support generation of dependencies that this feature requires.
Action
Switch to a build system that does support generation of dependency information. The standard JDeveloper build system supports this.
Now is there a way that I can configure Ant to create this dependency information (maybe by using the Oracle compiler in JDeveloper)?

At this time there is no way to configure this feature to work when using the Ant build system. It is possible to use the Oracle Java Compiler from within your Ant buildfile. However, due to the arbitrary content of an Ant buildfile, JDeveloper still has no way of knowing if the resulting compilation will produce all the information needed for an accurate dependency analysis. Therefore, this feature is disabled when using the Ant build system. A possible solution might be to configure your project to use the normal JDeveloper build system to enable this feature, and run Ant manually by right clicking on the buildfile in the System Navigator and selecting the target you want to bulid.
-Matt Hawkins, JDeveloper Team

[svn:fx-trunk] 16385: -removed the utilities package target since it' s not used any longer - at least what is contained in this target.

Revision: 16385
Revision: 16385
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-06-01 13:32:35 -0700 (Tue, 01 Jun 2010)
Log Message:
-removed the utilities package target since it's not used any longer - at least what is contained in this target. I believe this was a leftover from flex 2 days.
-fix up the packaging targets to ensure they are being properly built. I removed depends="temp-clean" and inserted antcall target="temp-clean" because a target gets executed only once, even when more than one target depends on it.
QE notes:
Doc notes: no
Bugs: no
Reviewer: Guarav
Tests run: no
Is noteworthy for integration: no
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/build.xml

http://blogs.adobe.com/jkost/2014/06/installing-the-2014-release-of-creative-cloud.html
-This messages says (at least some) CC 2014 programs use NEW plugins https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1499663
-so do not uninstall the older CC programs if you use plugins in your programs until you are sure you have plugins that work in CC2014
If you are sure you don't need the old CC programs
-http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/help/install-apps.html to install or uninstall

[svn:fx-trunk] 7747: Remove override of focusInHandler since TLF now calls preventDefault on any nav keys it processes .

Revision: 7747
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-06-11 07:28:32 -0700 (Thu, 11 Jun 2009)
Log Message:
Remove override of focusInHandler since TLF now calls preventDefault on any nav keys it processes.
QA Notes: we need to be sure to test RET keyboard input and navigation on AIR since the keyboard events are slightly different than for the player
Doc Notes:
Bugs: SDK-21552
Reviewers: Gordon
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-21552
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/RichEditable TextContainerManager.as

Dropping down to the next line is normal behavior because Menus don't resize. For what you want, you should probably find a good Responsive Menu system.
http://responsive-nav.com/
http://jasonweaver.name/lab/flexiblenavigation/
http://www.projectseven.com/products/templates/pagepacks/dmm/affinity/menu-modes/index.htm
Nancy O.

[svn] 4366: Remove hard references to the Application class.

Revision: 4366
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-12-19 12:54:06 -0800 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008)
Log Message:
Remove hard references to the Application class.
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
Bugs: None
Reviewer: Alex
tests: checkintests, Application, controls, containers/Accordion, containers/ApplicationControlBar, containers/ControlBar
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/containers/ApplicationControlBar.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/states/AddChild.as

All components can only be shown in one spot at a time. It's not anything you've done wrong in particular as it will happen with any component. The solution is to abstract the data you want to display away from the canvas, using the subclass merely as a window to the data. Then, you can have mutliple instances of your subclass using the same reference to the data. So whenever the data changes, all instances of the canvas subclass will get the changes (although they may still need to be repainted to display the change). Feel free to ask if you have any more questions.
-JBoeing

[svn] 2472: remove flex4. swc - should not have been checked in as it gets produced during the compile

Revision: 2472
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-07-14 13:21:25 -0700 (Mon, 14 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
remove flex4.swc - should not have been checked in as it gets produced during the compile
remove StyleProperty.vm - it is no longer used
Removed Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/libs/flex4.swc
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/as3/StyleProperty.vm

My daughter has had her Razr for about 9 months now. About two weeks ago she picked up her phone in the morning on her way to school when she noticed two cracks, both starting at the camera lens. One goes completely to the bottom and the other goes sharply to the side. She has never dropped it and me and my husband went over it with a fine tooth comb. We looked under a magnifying glass and could no find any reason for the glass to crack. Not one ding, scratch or bang. Our daughter really takes good care of her stuff, but we still wanted to make sure before we sent it in for repairs. Well we did and we got a reply from Motorola with a picture of the cracks saying this was customer abuse and that it is not covered under warranty. Even though they did not find any physical damage to back it up. Well I e-mailed them back and told them I did a little research and found pages of people having the same problems. Well I did not hear from them until I received a notice from Fed Ex that they were sending the phone back. NOT FIXED!!! I went to look up why and guess what there is no case open any more for the phone. It has been wiped clean. I put in the RMA # it comes back not found, I put in the ID #, the SN# and all comes back not found. Yet a day earlier all the info was there. I know there is a lot more people like me and all of you, but they just don't want to be bothered so they pay to have it fix, just to have it do it again. Unless they have found the problem and only fixing it on a customer pay only set up. I am furious and will not be recommending this phone to anyone. And to think I was considering this phone for my next up grade! NOT!!!!

[svn] 640: Removing unnecessary dependencies on ant-contrib; we no longer have any need for it.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for