[svn:fx-trunk] 11540: Adding a bunch of ASDoc samples for the following classes:

Revision: 11540
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-11-06 14:27:40 -0800 (Fri, 06 Nov 2009)
Log Message:
Adding a bunch of ASDoc samples for the following classes:
    ColorBurnShader.as
    ColorDodgeShader.as
    ColorShader.as
    ExclusionShader.as
    HueShader.as
    LuminosityMaskShader.as
    LuminosityShader.as
    SaturationShader.as
    SoftLightShader.as
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/shaders/Colo rBurnShader.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/shaders/Colo rDodgeShader.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/shaders/Colo rShader.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/shaders/Excl usionShader.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/shaders/HueS hader.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/shaders/Lumi nosityMaskShader.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/shaders/Lumi nosityShader.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/shaders/Satu rationShader.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/shaders/Soft LightShader.as

Similar Messages

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 8615: Added in enumerations to Inspectable metadata for a bunch of properties.

    Revision: 8615
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-07-15 17:06:27 -0700 (Wed, 15 Jul 2009)
    Log Message:
    Added in enumerations to Inspectable metadata for a bunch of properties.
    Reviewer: Ryan
    QA: Yes, regress
    Doc: No
    Checkintests: Pass
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/HGroup.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/SkinnableContainer.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/supportClasses/GroupBase.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/core/IDeferredContentOwner.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/core/SpriteVisualElement.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/AnimateTransform.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/AnimateTransform3D.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/HorizontalLayout.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/TileLayout.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/VerticalLayout.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/supportClasses/LayoutBase.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/BitmapImage.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/VideoElement.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/styles/metadata/BasicInheritingTextSty les.as

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 10866: Fix broken links in ASDoc comments for TLFTextInput. as and TextArea.as, and add OverrideBase.as to ASDoc output

    Revision: 10866
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-10-05 08:56:44 -0700 (Mon, 05 Oct 2009)
    Log Message:
    Fix broken links in ASDoc comments for TLFTextInput.as and TextArea.as, and add OverrideBase.as to ASDoc output
    QE notes: -
    Doc notes: -
    Bugs: -
    Reviewer: -
    Tests run: - checkintests
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/states/OverrideBase.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/mx/controls/TLFTextInput.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/TextArea.as

    Sorry about that. I am not exactly sure where the problem is, but I know it takes place after I put the <nav> in (in the html portion). If I understand what I am learning, the CSS at the top will structure my html code so I would have thought the CSS tageting my nav would be the focus. Maybe it is a different section though.
    CSS part:
    nav p {
    font-size: 90%;
    color: #FFC;
    text-align: right;
    font-weight: bold;
    background-color: #090;
    padding-top: 5px;
    padding-right: 20px;
    padding-bottom: 5px;
    border-top-width: 2px;
    border-top-style: solid;
    border-top-color: #060;
    HTML part: (bold italic is the part I added)
    <body>
    <div class="container">
      <div id="apDiv1"><img src="Lessons/images/butterfly-ovr.png" width="170" height="158" alt="GreenStart Logo"></div>
      <header></header>
      <nav>
        <p>Home | About Us | Contact Us</p>
      </nav>
      <div class="sidebar1">
        <ul class="nav">
          <li><a href="#">Green News</a></li>
          <li><a href="#">Green Products</a></li>
          <li><a href="#">Green Events</a></li>
          <li><a href="#">Green Travel</a></li>
          <li><a href="#">Green Tips</a></li>
        </ul>

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 5875: Renaming some of our asdoc samples.

    Revision: 5875
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2009-04-02 10:14:00 -0700 (Thu, 02 Apr 2009)
    Log Message:
    Renaming some of our asdoc samples. I am removing the "Fx" prefix from the filenames.
    Added Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/ButtonExample .mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/ListExample.m xml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/TextAreaExamp le.mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/TextInputExam ple.mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/ToggleButtonE xample.mxml
    Removed Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/FxButtonExamp le.mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/FxHSliderExam ple.mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/FxListExample .mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/FxNumericStep perExample.mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/FxSpinnerExam ple.mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/FxTextAreaExa mple.mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/FxTextInputEx ample.mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/FxToggleButto nExample.mxml
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/FxVSliderExam ple.mxml

    There were a few issues indeed with maven and the version of the sdk we used in the sample.
    I just fixed by comitting a few upgrades in the builds:
    * we migrated the todo sample to flex-mojos 4 (you'll have to migrate to maven3 as well)
    ** This change was tested with maven 3.0.2.
    * and the flex sdk to 4.5.0.18623.
    Please note that as mentioned in the flexmojos docs in addition, there is one JAR (AIR development tools) that is packaged with the Flex SDK but is not open source.
    Because of this, flexMojos cannot host this artifact. To build from source, you will need to install this artifact into your own private repo:
    mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=com.adobe.flex -DartifactId=adt -Dversion=4.5.0.18623 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=adt.jar
    This JAR is bundled with the Flex SDK, which is freely available from: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Downloads
    This changes (cf. http://forums.adobe.com/thread/788583?tstart=0 ) should fix the issue you were facing with our todo sample.
    If you still have any, feel free to ping us again.
    Meanwhile there's also a very nice and very simple sample on sonatype docs presenting the maven/java/flex stack (but without cairngorm) :
    http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/reference-application.html

  • [svn:bz-trunk] 20970: Add or enhance include functionality for the following configuration elements :

    Revision: 20970
    Revision: 20970
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2011-03-25 14:26:37 -0700 (Fri, 25 Mar 2011)
    Log Message:
    Add or enhance include functionality for the following configuration elements:
    - Adapters
    - Channel definitions
    - Security Constraints
    - Destinations
    - Services
    The following elements are now allowed and can specify either the "file-path" attribute or the "directory-path" attribute.
    The "directory-path" attribute references a directory of XML files (names ending in .xml) that will be treated as a sequence of include files.
    Added unit tests for all the above.
    Fixed a bug in the unit test code that was terminating the verification early.
    Add the confirmation of the security constraints at the top level.
    Updated the example config file with usage examples.
    Modified Paths:
        blazeds/trunk/modules/common/src/flex/messaging/config/ClientConfigurationParser.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/common/src/flex/messaging/config/ConfigurationConstants.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/common/src/flex/messaging/errors.properties
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/SecuritySettings.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/ServerConfigurationParser.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/ConfigurationConfirmation.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/1c.xml
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/1e.xml
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/1e_destination_include .xml
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/1f_service_include.xml
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/Confirm1c.java
    Added Paths:
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/1e_adapter_include.xml
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/1e_channel_include.xml
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/1e_constraint_include. xml
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/1i.xml
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/1j.xml
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/Confirm1i.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/config/services/Confirm1j.java

    SDN is the place to discuss technical problems..
    Please avoid such weird post.
    G@urav.

  • [svn:osmf:] 14411: Adding command line build config files for the syndication library.

    Revision: 14411
    Revision: 14411
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-02-24 17:45:22 -0800 (Wed, 24 Feb 2010)
    Log Message:
    Adding command line build config files for the syndication library.
    Added Paths:
        osmf/trunk/libs/Syndication/syndication-build-config.flex
        osmf/trunk/libs/Syndication/syndication-build-config.flexcov
        osmf/trunk/libs/Syndication/syndication-build-config.xml

    Revision: 14411
    Revision: 14411
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-02-24 17:45:22 -0800 (Wed, 24 Feb 2010)
    Log Message:
    Adding command line build config files for the syndication library.
    Added Paths:
        osmf/trunk/libs/Syndication/syndication-build-config.flex
        osmf/trunk/libs/Syndication/syndication-build-config.flexcov
        osmf/trunk/libs/Syndication/syndication-build-config.xml

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 9453: Fix ASDoc comments, exclude the LayoutElementHelper class.

    Revision: 9453
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-08-21 10:48:14 -0700 (Fri, 21 Aug 2009)
    Log Message:
    Fix ASDoc comments, exclude the LayoutElementHelper class.
    QE notes: None
    Doc notes: None
    Bugs: None
    Reviewer: Hans
    Tests run: N/A
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/supportClasses/LayoutElementHe lper.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/GraphicEleme nt.as

  • [svn] 2594: For the following:

    Revision: 2594<br />Author:   [email protected]<br />Date:     2008-07-23 11:41:51 -0700 (Wed, 23 Jul 2008)<br /><br />Log Message:<br />-----------<br />For the following:<br /><br />  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><br />  <mx:Application xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009" xmlns:mx="library:adobe/flex/halo"><br />    <Graphic ><br />      <Model/><br />    </Graphic><br />  </mx:Application><br /><br />Two initializers were being created.  One for the top level variable,<br />created via ModelBuilder's registerModel() call.  The other for the<br />Graphic.content default property.  Both initializers were creating a<br />RHS initializer function, which was causing a duplicate function<br />error.  This fix just suppresses the creation of the top level<br />variable and it's associated initializer, if the Model isn't toplevel.<br />I suspect no one has run into this before, because most visual<br />components don't have an untyped property, which is set to a Model.<br />Very rare edge case.<br /><br />tests Passed: checkintests<br /><br />Needs QA: YES<br /><br />Needs DOC: NO<br /><br />Bug fixes: SDK-16039<br /><br />API Change: NO<br /><br />Reviewer: clucier<br /><br />Code-level description of changes:<br /> <br />  DocumentBuilder.java<br /><br />    Modified ModelBuilder constructor call to pass in null for the parent.<br /><br />  ModelBuilder.java<br /><br />    Added parent variable and modified constructor to set it.<br /><br />    Modified analyze(ModelNode) to pass in (parent == null) for the<br />    toplevel param of registerModel().<br /><br />  AbstractBuilder.java<br /><br />    Modified ModelBuilder constructor call to pass in model for the parent.<br /><br />Ticket Links:<br />------------<br />    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/utf-8<br />    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16039<br /><br />Modified Paths:<br />--------------<br />    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/builder/AbstractBuilder.java <br />    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/builder/DocumentBuilder.java <br />    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/builder/ModelBuilder.java

    Based on the current benchmarks and reviews, I would say the MBA could +in theory+ do all that, but I think you would be highly disappointed with its performance. You may be ok if you did only one of the things you listed at a time, but I'm getting the feeling that this isn't the way you would like to use your notebook.
    The biggest weakness of the MBA is the inability to upgrade the RAM beyond 2GB, as well as the slower parallel ATA interface the HDD uses. Bottom line - the MBA wasn't really designed for anything beyond light use (writing, note taking, email, web browsing) But if portability>performance (for you), then I'd suggest seeing how the MBA fares by heading down to an Apple Store and putting one through its paces before committing to buying one.
    I just see so many posts here where people with a laundry list of expectations from a notebook are ready to drop ~$1800 for an MBA when from a practical standpoint, that kind of money would be better spent on a higher performing MB or MBP. (IMO)
    Message was edited by: Shaggywerewolf

  • [svn] 3186: ASDoc fixes for the MXML RPC concurrency property

    Revision: 3186
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-09-11 16:10:56 -0700 (Thu, 11 Sep 2008)
    Log Message:
    ASDoc fixes for the MXML RPC concurrency property
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/rpc/mxml/Concurrency.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/rpc/remoting/mxml/RemoteObject.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/rpc/soap/mxml/WebService.as

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 7784: adding xslt change so info related to Alternative shows up in the asdoc

    Revision: 7784
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-06-12 07:46:21 -0700 (Fri, 12 Jun 2009)
    Log Message:
    adding xslt change so info related to Alternative shows up in the asdoc
    QE Notes: None.
    Doc Notes: None.
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/asdoc/templates/class-parts.xslt
    Added Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/asdoc/templates/images/P_AlternativeMetadataIndicator_30x28_N.png

    I've checked the resolution in Photoshop just as a double-check and it shows resolution as 300 PPI. When you say "because they can be mixed" do you mean because elements and graphics with the PDF can be of varying resolutions? I hadn't thought of that, if that's what you meant. I do have some items within my pdf that might be lower resolution.
    If these show up in my Preflight Panel as an issue, does this mean they would be flagged also with the Printer? In trying to find a resolution I read several forum discussions about how Printers often run your document through a Preflight process and will send it back when there are low resolution images in the document.
    Is there some other way to be sure these images are in the InDesign document as 300 PPI so I can know they will in fact print correctly?
    PS - Peter - thanks for the super quick response! And I saw your the highlighted "Exceptional Contributor" on the right sidebar for the InDesign forum - clearly well-deserved! Congrats

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 11483: Adding a LRU cache for the transcoding results of a CFF based DefineFont4 tag to avoid transcoding the same font description twice .

    Revision: 11483
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-11-05 16:01:37 -0800 (Thu, 05 Nov 2009)
    Log Message:
    Adding a LRU cache for the transcoding results of a CFF based DefineFont4 tag to avoid transcoding the same font description twice.
    Also we now throw a better error when CFFFontManager is asked to embed a local font by name as this is not yet supported.
    QE notes: Please test that the same font embedded twice does not take twice as long as a single embedding.
    Doc notes: N/A
    Bugs:
    SDK-23966 - Compiler should generate a warning or error when embedAsCFF is true and src:local is used for font embedding
    SDK-23806 - OEM compiler appears to transcode embedded fonts twice
    SDK-23788 - Search fonts recursively
    Reviewer: Paul
    Tests run: Checkintests, bug test cases
    Is noteworthy for integration: Yes
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-23966
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-23806
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-23788
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/lib/flex-fontkit.jar
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fonts/FontDescription.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/tags/DefineFont4.java

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 7677: adding xslt change so Theme shows up in asdoc for the styles ( where applicable)

    Revision: 7677
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-06-09 10:54:15 -0700 (Tue, 09 Jun 2009)
    Log Message:
    adding xslt change so Theme shows up in asdoc for the styles (where applicable)
    QE Notes: None.
    Doc Notes: None.
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/asdoc/templates/ASDoc_terms.xml
        flex/sdk/trunk/asdoc/templates/class-files.xslt

    Sorry about that. I am not exactly sure where the problem is, but I know it takes place after I put the <nav> in (in the html portion). If I understand what I am learning, the CSS at the top will structure my html code so I would have thought the CSS tageting my nav would be the focus. Maybe it is a different section though.
    CSS part:
    nav p {
    font-size: 90%;
    color: #FFC;
    text-align: right;
    font-weight: bold;
    background-color: #090;
    padding-top: 5px;
    padding-right: 20px;
    padding-bottom: 5px;
    border-top-width: 2px;
    border-top-style: solid;
    border-top-color: #060;
    HTML part: (bold italic is the part I added)
    <body>
    <div class="container">
      <div id="apDiv1"><img src="Lessons/images/butterfly-ovr.png" width="170" height="158" alt="GreenStart Logo"></div>
      <header></header>
      <nav>
        <p>Home | About Us | Contact Us</p>
      </nav>
      <div class="sidebar1">
        <ul class="nav">
          <li><a href="#">Green News</a></li>
          <li><a href="#">Green Products</a></li>
          <li><a href="#">Green Events</a></li>
          <li><a href="#">Green Travel</a></li>
          <li><a href="#">Green Tips</a></li>
        </ul>

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 10959: Adding support for FXG 2. 0 additional blend modes that do not have a SWF equivalent.

    Revision: 10959
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-10-09 13:38:19 -0700 (Fri, 09 Oct 2009)
    Log Message:
    Adding support for FXG 2.0 additional blend modes that do not have a SWF equivalent. For the optimized FXG case, we now generate an ActionScript SymbolClass and set the corresponding blend shader. This requires checking in the additional shader classes and PBJ files, but note we do not yet use them in MXML graphics.
    Note: This change does not address luminosity masks.
    QE notes: Please update FXG opt. testsuites for additional blendModes.
    Doc notes: No
    Bugs: N/A
    Reviewer: Paul
    Tests run: checkintests, mustella spark/core/fxg
    Is noteworthy for integration: Yes, this change includes support for the additional blendModes of FXG 2.0 (though only for the optimized FXG case, and not MXML graphics).
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/SparkClasses.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/fxg/FlexFXG2SWFTranscoder.java
    Added Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/Color.pbj
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/ColorBurn.pbj
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/ColorBurnShader.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/ColorDodge.pbj
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/ColorDodgeShader.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/ColorShader.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/Exclusion.pbj
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/ExclusionShader.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/Hue.pbj
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/HueShader.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/Luminosity.pbj
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/LuminosityShader.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/Saturation.pbj
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/SaturationShader.as
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/SoftLight.pbj
        flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/shaders/SoftLightShader.as

    Ive resolved vertical refresh and resolution issues by declaring VideoRam value in fglrx section of my xorg.conf.

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 12367: Added deprecation warning for the use of SVG.

    Revision: 12367
    Revision: 12367
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-12-02 08:30:21 -0800 (Wed, 02 Dec 2009)
    Log Message:
    Added deprecation warning for the use of SVG.
    QE notes: None
    Doc notes: None
    Bugs: SDK-24392
    Reviewer: Paul
    Tests run: SVG test cases.
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-24392
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/media/SVGTranscoder.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler_en.properties

  • [svn:bz-trunk] 9838: Bug: BLZ-416  - Can bypass checks for which channel and protocol a destination can be called over by using NetConnection instead of BlazeDS messaging .

    Revision: 9838
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-08-31 11:27:50 -0700 (Mon, 31 Aug 2009)
    Log Message:
    Bug: BLZ-416  - Can bypass checks for which channel and protocol a destination can be called over by using NetConnection instead of BlazeDS messaging.
    QA: Yes
    Doc: Yes - note the new enforce-endpoint-validation setting.
    Details: Added the following config setting:
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-416
    Modified Paths:
        blazeds/trunk/modules/common/src/flex/messaging/config/ConfigurationConstants.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/MessageBroker.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/MessagingConfiguration.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/ServerConfigurationParser.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/SystemSettings.java

Maybe you are looking for