Switch (non-cisco) configuration for UC320W + SPA508G Phones

Hi I have a TP-Link 24 port PoE switch (TL-SG3424P) which I have connected to a UC320W and 8 x SPA508G Phones.
What settings are required for the UC320W to be able to link to the 508G Phones?

The switch should support CDP so the phones will go into the voice VLAN.  If you need more info, you'll want to go into the UC300 discussions group.  Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • CCM MGCP configuration for an analog phone

    Hi all,
    I am in trouble with between CCM and FXS port. When I pick an analog phone up on FXS port, It always sounds busy-tone, so I can not dial everytimes. Strangely it is possible to call from ip phone to analog phone, but not from the analog phone to IP phone. Of course, I made sure that both of FXS port and phone were registered to CCM properly.
    In this case, Do I need specific configuration for FXS on IOS gateway, based on 2600xx, or on CCM ?
    can anybody else know about those kinds of situation or experienced people ?
    My simple config is the following
    -------- the following on 26xxXM IOS ---------
    MGCP
    mgcp
    mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band
    mgcp call-agent 192.168.10.10
    mgcp sdp simple
    ccm-manager mgcp
    dial-peer voice 101 pots
    application MGCPAPP
    port 1/0/0
    -------- the end --------------

    Knew codec's and their usages.
    But in an actual deploying environement haven't encountered (if there is any thing like guaranteed bandwidth; not much of as said by bevilacqua; but may be consumed by an ip phone to make its fresh registration), as very well we knew that the bandwidth 64k is enough to establish call using G729 WAN end. More over the 64k pipeline is used for voice and data.
    Thanks for sharing the link. Went through the topic. It's useful.
    Regds,
    Karthik

  • What is the Cisco tool for measuring traffic of wireless endpoint users

    Hi Experts
    I am looking to start a Mesh WISP utilizing Cisco Aironet products (1500 series) and would like to know what is the best Cisco (or if the case has to be "non Cisco") product for measuring the amount of traffic from wireless clients connected to my Cisco Mesh.
    Basically I want to be able to say User xyz has this IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx how much have they uploaded and how much have they downloaded this month.
    This also then allows me to integrate multiple business mobile devices into their broadband plans which is something no-one yet offers in my City.
    From what I have read Netflow is the measurement technology but how do I take this data and aggregate it by IP / User for billing purposes. Is there something better at it than Netflow? Your expert opinions and suggestions are much appreciated.
    Regards
    Ty

    That sounds like Cisco Wireless Control System (WCS).
    Cisco Wireless Control System (WCS) Data Sheet
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5755/ps6301/ps6305/product_data_sheet0900aecd802570d0.html
    Please don't forget to rate useful posts.  Thanks.

  • Configuring Switch for CCA is behind non-Cisco phone, NAC OOB VGW Deployment

    Hi,
    I need to configure the edge switch port to keep serving non-Cisco IP phone on deploying NAC as OOB VGW.
    I appreciate your advise, but make sure 802.1x solution as the last option.
    Thanks
    Mike

    Hi,
    Please look at the config guide:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/nac/appliance/configuration_guide/48/cam/m_oob.html.
    HTH,
    Tiago
    If  this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as  "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.

  • ISE web auth for non-cisco switch(D-link 3528)

    Is it possible to use ISE(inline posture node) to redirect the wired users to ISE guest portal ?
    And the wired users will get full network access after they pass the web auth.

    you can use ISE ln-line posture node with 3rd part switches
    RADIUS access device must supply the following RADIUS attributes:
        Calling-Station-Id (for MAC_ADDRESS)
        User-Name
        NAS-Port-Type
        RADIUS accounting message must have the Framed-IP-Address attribute
    VLAN, DACL features can be used  but again it depends on switch models let us know  specific switch  models . Certain advanced use cases, such as those that involve posture assessment, profiling, and web authentication, are not consistently available with non-Cisco devices or may provide limited functionality,

  • Cisco tool for building router/switch configurations

    Is there a tool on Cisco website that lets you build your own configurations of Cisco routers etc prior to you purchasing them? i.e. Giving you a complete list of part IDs ?

    Hi
    Your question is not clear , if you asked about a tool which can help you to do a configuration for your purchase order for routers , switches , any solution for Cisco . You can configure your chassis , cards , SFPs, Power , and so on. Please use the below link:-
    https://cisco-apps.cisco.com/cisco/psn/commerce
    Thank you
    please rate all useful infomration

  • Using 802.1X and non-Cisco IP Phones

    Hi there,
    Having some questions about an 802.1x/non-Cisco ip phone setup and was hoping to find some answers/user-experience with this setup.
    Main questions i'm facing:
    1) When using non-Cisco ip phones (eg Nortel or Siemens) and a previous authorized client connected behind this ip phone gets disconnected. What will this action do with the authorized state of 802.1X on the switch port? WIll it stay authorized until the reauth timer expires or does it reject communication from any other device?
    2) What about EAPOL-Logoff messages from the ip phone to the switch. Are these only used by Cisco phones when they experience a link-status change on data ports?
    Thanks for sharing your thoughts

    Overall, you need to try and deal with the fact that a machine can disappear from the network and the network may not know about it directly (i.e. Link doesn't go down).
    I have no idea what other phones do, but Cisco phones send an EAPOL-Logoff when something is unplugged. This lets the switch know directly, and 1X session start is torn down immediately, closing what would be a security hole.
    Fundamentally, re-auth is a workaround only, and this is not the reason to enable re-auth to begin with.
    If your phone doesn't send an EAPOL-Logoff in this case, the switch might be left thinking an attack is underway when someone else tries to plug in (with presumably a different MAC). You do NOT want this to occur.
    Hope this helps,

  • SIP 7960 to non-Cisco Switch

    Does anyone know if a 7960 (SIP) phone can connect to a non-Cisco switch and separate the Voice traffic from the access port traffic?
    I tried connecting a 7960 to a baystack 450T, configuring the switchport as a "tagged trunk", and then changing the Admin Vlan ID on the phone to the desired voice vlan. It looks as though the switch wants the access port traffic to be tagged as well.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Darin

    Hi !
    You need to configure a 802.1q trunk on your non-cisco switch. The 802.1q native vlan should be the one the PC is in. The voice vlan will be tagged.
    Configure all parameters (like voice-vlan-id etc) on the phone manually (obviously CDP does not work). I have done it and it works fine (but i never tried on the switch you mentioned).
    Inline Power will also not work because the 7960 is not 802.3af compliant (yet).
    Mike

  • Non cisco/Third party phones are compatible with CCX 9 or not?

    Dear Guys,
    I have a CCX 9 server integrated with CUCM 9 and also non cisco based/Third party phones (SNOM IP Phones) as agent for CCX server. when i try to log in to CAD software with User ID and password that assigned to SNOM phone  i got JTAPI error but with CIPC(Cisco IP Communicator) works fine and i could log on without any issue. i checked RMuser controlled device and also allow controlled CTI port,all configured. i checked all documents about this issue but it is not mentioned anything about SNOM phone used as agent. any idea for that? any documents for compatibility list between CCX and agent platform...
    i have checked below links
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/custcosw/ps5693/ps1844/prod_qas0900aecd80422e66.pdf
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf
    Special thanks in advance for your help
    Sara

    Hi Sara,
    If you do not see it in the UCCX comp matirx, than please remember that you will not get support from Cisco TAC incase if you hit any issues with this deployment.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf
    Thanks,
    Anand

  • Catalyst Express 500 802.1q with non-Cisco Phones

    This weekend we spent hours trying to get 802.1q tagging to work on a VLAN with ShoreTel phones. The user interface on this switch seems to only allow "Cisco-Voice" VLAN, without any specifics. This didn't work. The specs on this switch say that the .1q is supported, but we couldn't figure it out. The more expensive switches were easier to configure for Voip QoS.
    Can anyone advise me on the tricks to getting this to work with the lower end Catalyst Express 500? Or does this switch only support 802.1q with Cisco phones?

    Cisco IP Phone uses CDP to let the ip phone know what vlan it's suppose to be (via voice-vlan). shore tel would definitely not use CDP since CDP is cisco proprietory, so it's voice vlan must be defined on it, I rememer Avaya being the same way. So, having said that, just make sure that the Shore tel Ip phone are in the right vlan. what does not work anyway? shore Tel IP Phone will not come up? Will not get it's configuration from it's software PBX? Use the smartport configuration on CE500.
    Please rate all posts.

  • Switchport Configuration for NEC Phones

    Having an issue setting up a switch for NEC ip phones.  If I use something like this:
    int gi 0/23
    description Phone and PC, no hubs
    switchport mode access
    switchport access vlan 10
    switchport access voice vlan 5
    spanning-tree portfast
    lldp transmit
    lldp receive
    The phones boot up fine, but get ips from the dhcp pool for vlan 10.  My pc behind that also gets an ip in vlan 10.  I went to a test phone and enable cdp and when I went back to my switch I saw the phone in cdp neighbors, but the phone still grabbed the ip from the other vlan.  If I manually key in the vlan on the phone it gets the correct ip and the pc behind it gets the correct ip as well.  Just wondering if there is a better to go about this as they are deploying 150 phones.

    Have a look at table-10 and make sure you have configured all the options (150, etc.) correctly.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/5_0_4/ccmcfg/b02dhsrv.html#wp1050520
    HTH

  • Ce 500 non-cisco switch

    How should I configure the smartport on a catalyst express 500 switch if I am connecting a non-cisco switch like a small linksys. I dont think I can make the smartport a switch because it tries to trunk?? right??
    And if I leave it as a PC it complains abouting having to many devices connected to it.
    Would having it configured as something like an access point work??

    Now, I noticed something very odd, I kept the switch option selected on the port on the ce 500 that the linksys was plugged in to and the devices plugged in downstream behind the linksys all kept the correct VLAN assignment. Phones were in the voice vlan and PC's were in the data vlan. Does not really make sense to me how this is working??

  • Configuration of Cisco 2911 for Asterisk

    Hi all
    I use Cisco 2911 for Asterisk phone system communicate with external.
    However, sometime I can make call in and out. Sometime, just call in or out. Sometime, cannot make any call.
    I think it is the NAT, PAT and ACL in Cisco 2911 problem.  This Cisco is also a gateway to internet for users.
    Please any advice
    Thanks a lot
    Here is the configuration:
    Router#show run
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 1981 bytes
    ! Last configuration change at 20:06:06 UTC Thu Nov 14 2013
    ! NVRAM config last updated at 15:04:59 UTC Tue Nov 5 2013
    ! NVRAM config last updated at 15:04:59 UTC Tue Nov 5 2013
    version 15.1
    service timestamps debug datetime msec
    service timestamps log datetime msec
    no service password-encryption
    hostname Router
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    enable secret 5 xxxxx
    no aaa new-model
    memory-size iomem 20
    no ipv6 cef
    ip source-route
    ip cef
    multilink bundle-name authenticated
    crypto pki token default removal timeout 0
    license udi pid CISCO2911/K9 sn FTX1603AH9C
    interface Embedded-Service-Engine0/0
    no ip address
    interface GigabitEthernet0/0
    description internal-LAN
    ip address 172.x.x.x 255.255.0.0
    ip nat inside
    ip virtual-reassembly in
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    no ip address
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1.1
    encapsulation dot1Q 11
    ip address 172.16.x.x 255.255.240.0
    interface GigabitEthernet0/2
    description internet
    ip address 50.240.x.x 255.255.255.240
    ip nat outside
    ip virtual-reassembly in
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    ip forward-protocol nd
    no ip http server
    no ip http secure-server
    ip nat inside source list 100 interface GigabitEthernet0/2 overload
    ip route profile
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 50.240.x.x
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.10.0.30 name ROUTE-VPN-REMOTE
    ip route 172.16.240.0 255.255.254.0 172.10.x.x
    access-list 100 permit ip 172.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
    access-list 100 permit ip 172.16.240.0 0.0.0.255 any
    access-list 100 permit udp any any range 5004 5090
    access-list 100 permit udp any any range 10000 20000
    control-plane
    line con 0
    line aux 0
    line 2
    no activation-character
    no exec
    transport preferred none
    transport input all
    transport output pad telnet rlogin lapb-ta mop udptn v120 ssh
    stopbits 1
    line vty 0 4
    login
    transport input all
    scheduler allocate 20000 1000
    end

    There are some VSP where they do the NAT.  If your VSP (like mine) do the NAT, then you need to globally disable NAT in your Asterisk.
    My VSP also recommends I disable ALG on my router.
    So you need to ask you VSP.

  • Configuring Cisco ASA for site to site VPN ( Issue with setting up local network)

    OK, so our primary firewall is a checkpoint gateway. Behind that we have a cisco ASA for vpn users. I have a project at the moment where we need to connect to another company using site to site VPN through the cisco ASA, as the checkpoint gateway is unable to establish a permanent tunnel with the other companies Cisco ASA.
    What would be the best practise for setting up the local network on my side? Create the network on the ASA and then use a L2 vlan to connect to the Core switch? 
    Setup a L3 interface on the core switch and point it towards the checkpoint gateway which would then point to the ASA?
    When you have to select your local network through the site to site wizard do you have to put the inside network address of the ASA?
    Our network is setup like this: Access layer switch > Core 6500 Switch > Checkpoint-Firewall > Internet
    The ASA is connected to a checkpoint sub interface
    Any help would be beneficial as im new to cisco ASAs 
    Thanks
    Mark

    Mark
    If we understood more about your environment we might be able to give you better answers. My initial reaction was similar to the suggestion from Michael to use a L2 vlan. But as I think a bit more my attention is drawn to something that you mention in the original post. The ASA is there for VPN users. If the VPN users need to access your internal network then you probably already have something configured on the ASA that allows access to the internal network. Perhaps that same thing might provide access for your site to site VPN?
    HTH
    Rick

  • Optimal configuration for Cisco E3000 Router

    Hi All,
    Following are the details of my current home network setup, I would like to hear more recommendations and drawbacks of this setup.
    ISP has provided with a Cisco  DPC3825 DOCSIS 3.0 Gateway which has 4 Ethernet ports and a wireless networking but only 2.4 GHz.. This router is connected to the cable CPE box to internet. I have enabled the Firewall features of this router and disabled the Wireless network. This has also the DHCP server running. 
    The Second router is a Cisco E3000 which supports 2.4 GHz / GHz wireless networking. Connection to gateway is made via the 1st Ethernet port of gateway and then to the Internet port of E3000 router. I have connected my wireless devices to E3000 with GHz wifi lan. This router also has the firewall activated and DHCP server running as well.
    Both routers have WEP2 Personal / AES security configured. Currently these two devices are on two different IP ranges ..etc gateway is 192.168.0.1 and e3000 is 192.168.1.1.
    The E3000 is primarily configured for my online video for TV (Panasonic Vireacast). Please let me know if this is the best configuration or any other possible options.
    Thanks,
    RG

    This configuration is called LAN to WAN configuration and this is the best configuration considering that you want to behave both the router as a router.
    Because the other confiuration would be LAN to LAN then you can only use 1 router as a router and 2nd router as a switch.
    http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=529c188bc0ee4f7da79ffc22f2be33ec_4579.xml&pid=80&r...
    The first configuration in the article is is LAN to LAN, scroll down the window for LAN to WAN configuration.

Maybe you are looking for