SXMB_MONI Error - transportation lane related

I have transferred a PO from R/3 to SNC but I am getting an error in SXMB_MONI. It says 'ShipFromLocation could not be determined from transp. lane'. All products on the PO are present in the transportation lane. Yet the error message says 'Transportation lane(s) not found'.
How do I correct this error?

Even am experiencing the same problem for my new client.
I have checked the following:
1. Transportation Lane available between the Supplier Location and Plant Location
2. Product in PO assigned to the TLane
3. Validity of Tlane is correct
4. Means of Transport assigned to the Tlane
5. Validity of MOT is correct
6. Tlane is in active Model - 000
But still when the PO comes it fails with the error "Transportation lane(s) not found : 071(/SCMB/MDL_BASIC)
Item 00010: ShipFromLocation could not be determined from transp. lane - 042(/SCA/DM_MDCOMP
Transportation lane(s) not found: 071(/SCMB/MDL_BASIC)
Is this got to do with Active Model / Version? If so how to rectify that?
Regards,
Bharath

Similar Messages

  • SXMB_MONI Error - Product location related

    Getting an error in SXMB_MONI which says 'Product not found in location'. However this product exists at the corresponding location. What else should I check?

    Hi,
    In which process you are getting this error?
    I am assuming you are getting this error in purchase order collaboration process (PO created in ECC sent to SNC and failed in SNC).
    In SXMB_MONI go to failed XML and copy product then go to location product master.
    Transaction code /n/SAPAPO/MAT1 Paste the product and enter location (sometime there will be typo mistake possible).
    Check this location product is assigned to model 000.
    If this product exists at the corresponding location then update with  all erros you are getting SXMB_MONI and also mention in which process you are getting this error (RON_IN XML or DDN_IN XML or ROC_IN XML).
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • SPP Error - No valid transportation lane between Supplier and LOC1

    Hi
    While running the EOQ and SFT planning service, we get the following error
    "No valid transportation lane between Supplier and LOC1". LOC1 is the entry location for our BOD.
    We have not created any procurement relationships as we are working on a standalone SCM trialbox.
    Appreciate any help/suggestions to resolve this issue.
    Thanks & Best Regds
    Mitesh

    Hi Mitesh,
    You need to have valid transportation lanes from the supplier. Maintain it manually. If I remember correctly it is possible to have External Procurement Relationships in APO only (type 4) and not just contracts, purchasing inforecords or scheduling agreements CIFed from ECC.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Somnath

  • Error in Transport Lane Determination (/APO/SDP94)

    Hi Guys,
                Please can you help on the isuue :
    When I am entering a quantity for Planning Book in SDP94 for particular period(Week Format) and after pressing the enter key POP-UP for Transport Lane Determantion is coming and after adopting the transport lane if I am going to enter the quantity for other period and after pressing enter the POP-UP is not coming. After exiting and then coming back again I am able to complete the process.
    I want to enter the Multiple daat same time but due to this error I am unable to complete it.
    Can you tell me is it a software bug or any setting problem?
    Thanks in Advance,
    Santosh

    Hi,
       In SDP94 user has to enter the data manually for Final Dispatch. (This is for Transportation Lane) The Data will be entered manually.
    I have a Product in Production Plant (PRDPT)  (Source Location) . It has be transported to other location(TRLOC1, TRLOC2) .
    When  I have to enter the Quantity in source location for Dispatch in PRDPT and Pressing the ENTER key the Pop UP will come and then I have to select the location where I have to dispatch either in the transportation lane of TRLOC1 or TRLOC2
    First time POP-UP is coming to select the Transportation Lane for Disptach Location.
    So assume I have selected in 32nd week in PRDPT and selected TRLOC1.
    but suppose I want to enter for 33rd week in PRDPT and after pressing the enter key no POP-UP is coming.
    I am able to do it if I am doing Save and Exit after entering the 32nd week data and coming again to same screen and then enter the 33rd week data and so on.
    Please note that I am not going to enter the data of 32nd, 33rd or other week same time. I have to enter the data one by one. It menas after determination of 1st data , I have to go for 2nd data.
    Regards,
    Santosh Kumar Mishra

  • Hard constraint for shipment planning related to transportation lane

    While building shipments manually in SCM 5.0 system, soft constraints are displayed when transportation lane do not exist from supplying location to destination location. Is there any way to make them hard constraints in scm 5.0 system?
    Thanks,
    Nikhil

    Hi Nikhil,
    I do not find any way to achieve this. In manual shipment planning, the system will just issue warning messages. However the optimizer always will respect all such constraints.
    Any specific reason why you want to plan the shipments manually ? Normally manual planning is used to apply corrections to the shipments planned by the optimizer.
    However if you still want this functionality, you can raise the message to SAP to seek their feedback on this.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sandeep Patil

  • Transportation lane KEY not getting generated in the table

    Transportation lane KEY not getting generated in the table
    Hi folks,
    The issue is like this :
    We have a weekly workorders upload program from legacy systems to SAP-APO. The legacy planners send a .CSV file containing material-wise workroders. A customised zee program picks these quantities & writes them in Prod.planned keyfigures in SNP planning book. This process is done for the manufacturing locations only.
    Lately workorders for two particular material M1 & M2 had failed to get upload. It gives the error 'NO VALID SOURCE OF SUPPLY COULD BE FOUND' in its Job log. We did some debugging & found that for successful materials the  TRPID is getting generated in the table /SAPAPO/V_TRPROD  whereas this TRPID is missing for M1 & M2. Why this is happening is our main concern. We tried deleting the PPM & creating this again, assuming that the PPMID is the precursor for generating this TRPID, but this yielded no results.
    ____ for successful upload______________
    se16 --> /SAPAPO/V_TRPROD
    Version = 000
    LOCTO = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
    MATID = MATID KEY of successfully loaded workorder
    Enter
    This gives the following results
    TRPID = TRPID KEY
    LOCFR = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
    LOCTO = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
    MATID = MATID KEY for successfully loaded workorder
    ( This seems a self-lane, i.e both TO & FROM location are same)
    ____ for unsuccessful upload________
    se16 --> /SAPAPO/V_TRPROD
    Version = 000
    LOCTO = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
    MATID = MATID KEY for unsuccessfully loaded workorder
    Enter
    This gives the following results
    Error = No Table entries found for specified KEYS
    We are perplexed why this TRPID is not getting generated for these two particular material M1 & M2?
    We have deleted their PPM & re-created them to cross-check if the PPMID KEY is the trigger for generating the TRPID key. This didn't work!
    Please let us know in case someone faced a similar issue.
    Many Thanks.
    Kumar
    Edited by: Blue Lotus on Jun 9, 2011 2:44 PM

    Yes Anand.
    We deleted the PPM & created it again, which didn't work.
    Later on we deleted the product itself from APO & re-CIFed it from R3 & then re-created the PPM.
    The PPMID which was missing earlier is now getting created! However no luck with the TRPID.
    Why this TRPID is not getting generated in our only concern
    Regards
    Kumar

  • Automatic Creation of multiple Transportation Lanes

    Hi all.
    Is it possible to avoid following standard behaviour:
    Change of Supplying Plant in the Special Procurement Type
    If you have changed the supplying plant in the special procurement type in the ERP system, the SCM system creates a new transportation lane for the new combination of supplying plant (from special procurement type) and material/plant. The already existing transportation lane and the now invalid combination of supplying plant and plant in the ERP system is locked for orders in the SAP APO system. This can be seen from the lock indicator X that is set by the system.
    Automatic Creation of Transportation Lanes - Transportation Lane - SAP Library
    Our need for some SKU is to create automatically two T-Lanes. Considering user exit EXIT_SAPLCMAT_001, we added a new line on CT_CIF_MATLOC (and relative CT_CIF_MATLOCX) with different SUPPLPLANT, but the system obviously blocks (SPRKZ) the SKU on one of the two T-Lane.
    Thanks in advance for your support.

    Hi Mauro,
    In my opinion you have to create a program to delete the lock indicator. First you have to extract the information from tr.lanes, then change (delete X indicator) and save. This job should be scheduled before heuristic run.
    To extract data from tr.lanes you can use BAPI_TRLSRVAPS_GETLIST2. To change and save you can use BAPI_TRLSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI2.
    Hope that can help you!
    Thanks.
    Regards, Marius

  • Automatic creation of transportation lanes betwen intercompany plants

    Hello Experts,
      I need to create transportation lanes automatically through integration model between two intercompany plants. The relation between these two plants are of vendor--> customer in ECC and the documents used are of sales / PO type. Source list is availalbe for the purchasing plant. Is it possible to create transportation lane using source list? If this requires an enhancement, which BAdI is applicable?
    Regards,
    Raghavendra

    What is the Purchasing Document used - Purchasing Info Records or Contracts? You can CIF any of these to APO to create Procurement Relationships which in turn automatically creates Transportation Lane. You have to assign Means of Transport manually though. Note - T Lanes created with reference to Contract are however not used by SNP for source determination.
    The other option is Special Procurement Key - if assigned in Material Master will automatically create TLane in APO when Materials are CIFed. Downside of that process is no control on TLane Validity Date and / or other Planning Parameters like Lot Size / PDT.
    As for creation of T Lane based on Source List - SAP Help mentions it can be used but have not seen in any live project so cannot comment.
    Hope this helps.
    somnath

  • How to block CIFed Transportation lane from ECC to APO

    Dear all,
    I want to know if there is any way to stop automatic creation of Transportation lane in APO when material master records, with  procurement type F: External Procurement and special procurement U, are registered or modified in ECC.
    Although only APO-DP is implemented in our project, which does not require the transportation lanes at all, we have to delete not only a product location master record but also collesponding product specific transportation lane when the product is no longer available for demand planning. 
    The integration model includes only material master records, not other TL-related data such as Pur. info.
    I've tried to find any configurations or EXITs stuff which satisfy the requirement above, but couldn't find it...
    I would appreciate any information on this.
    Thanks in advance.
    So Kitagawa
    Edited by: So Kitagawa on May 14, 2008 6:12 PM

    I think this is created part of the Product Integration Model and is controlled via the Product Inbound User Exit - APOCF005.
    There is no User Exit for Transportation Lanes.
    In this User Exit ... there is a Structure /sapapo/matloc which I think contains the Procurement Type (BESKZ) and instead of the Spl. Procurement Key it contains the Supplying Plant (SUPPLPLANT),  Procurement Category (SUPPLTYPE).
    It's got to be the fields in the MATLOC Structure.
    Could be the MATLOCX Structure too ... I could not see any, so I think the above 2 fields should do it.
    Try Coding in this UserExit to make the SUPPLPLANT and SUPPLTYPE field as Blank via ABAP Code.  Do  not touch the BESKZ field as that is needed in APO. This should do it ...when you activate the Model the Inbound Processing.
    Hope this helps.  Reward Points if you do.
    Regards,
    Ambrish Mathur

  • AS2 Error: Transport status code: 403

    Dear SAP experts,
    Currently, our Trading Partner is sending messages to our server via HTTPS, AS2 connection.
    Our Trading Partner is getting error, Transport status code: 403.
    I've checked our AS2 adapter logs (SAP PI), and it says,
    Error in unkown channel: (No session available) >> Error type: LOGICAL_ERROR >> Error date: 1/14/10 7:28 AM >> Description: Inbound communication from ZZ-TRADINGPARTNER to 14-8410240001002 not allowed: com.seeburger.as2.exception.AS2PluginException: Failed to get inbound configuration from DATABASE. [1/14/10 7:28 AM]
    TRADINGPARTNER --> Sender ILN (Trading Partner)
    8410240001002 --> Receiver ILN (SAP PI - our server)
    Kindly advise where the issue resides.
    Is it from Trading Partner's configuration?
    Thanks very much!
    Gerberto

    It could be related to missing configuration at your side. Have you created the sender agreement properly? It could be problem with incorrect use of party while creation of sender agreement.
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Problem in using BAPI_TRLSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI to create transportation lanes

    Hi,
      While using BAPI_TRLSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI to create transportation lanes,bapi returns errors
    1.Product transportation lane not found in database or in the tables and
    2.Product <matnr> ( coming from the flat file in the program ) cannot be both product-independent and product-specific.
    Please suggest solution to the problem.

    Try to user APO Loader Excel and fill the data you are filling for BAPI "BAPI_TRLSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI" and see whether it works or not ?
      Alternately you can fetch the data from APO to Excel using the get option of the "APO Loader Excel"
    Please reward points if this helps to you.

  • Mass deleting product specific transportation lanes

    I am trying to use MASSD transaction for mass deletion flag of T lanes. Can someone explain what component and attributes should I enter in selection criteria and components and attributes to be maintained?
    I am doing product u2013 product in u201Cselection criteriau201D
    Product u2013 block indicator in u201Ccomponents and attributes to be maintainedu201D
    When I set fixed value to u201CDu201D and save, itu2019s giving me lot of warning and error messages. I doubt if I am using the right selection criteria
    Example of error messages:
    LANE (Product) : Time-based validities overlap
    LANE (Means of Transport) : The validities of means of transportation XXXXX overlap
    LANE (Product) : Product X does not exist in source location Y
    Thx

    Satyajit,
    I deleted the product from location Y and tried MASSD again, still it shos some errors.
    Main error being
    LANE (Means of Transport) : The validities of means of transportation XXXX overlap
    what does this error mean? I cjhecked the vality for both product specific trans lane and means of transport. they both are same. even if I want to change it in change mode, its greyed out.
    I just checked one more material and it did not show any error message. but when I go check in SCC_TL1, i dont see "D" set for that product. do u know why it did not carry over from massd? Thx

  • Transportation Lanes Deletion

    We have a transportation lane established between 2 DCs. Now there is a change in supplying DC and a new DC will be supplying these products.
    I am attempting deletion of existing transportation lanes. The end gaol is to establish a new transportation lane and have SNP pick that automatically instead of the existing lane.
    I deleted all orders using RLCDELETE. However I am still getting an error message while deleting existing transportation lane that says "Orders Still Exist".
    I was wondering if there any utility that shows the orders on that transportaion lane.

    I guess there are some livecache order exist in the system for those TL.
    Please check with tcode  WUF and try to delete them by /SAPAPO/SDORDER_DEL
    /SAPAPO/DELETE_PP_ORDER
    and let us know if you are not able to delete it by above report with order details.
    Manish

  • Automatic creation of transportation lane between two Plants or location

    Hi,
    I am aware that when we cif Inforecords from R/3 to APO new transportation lanes automatically gets created between the Plant and Vendor.
    The isssue which i am facing is that i want transportation lanes to be created between two plants . The TL should be created automatically. I could find the below details from sap help.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm41/helpdata/EN/3e/dfaf376ed96c21e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    Transportation Lanes with Reference to R/3 Material Master Record
    Storing a special procurement type with procurement type F: External Procurement and special procurement U: Stock Transfer (in the MRP 2 view of the R/3 material master record), means that the material has to be procured externally from another plant (supplying plant) or transferred from another plant.
    To also be able to perform stock transfers for this material in the SAP APO system, there has to be a transportation lane from the supplying plant to the receiving plant. If you have transferred a material with this special procurement type from the SAP R/3 system, the SAP APO system automatically creates a corresponding transportation lane from the supplying plant to the receiving plant for the supplying plant (from the special procurement type) and material/plant combination. The transportation lane is given the creation indicator u201CSu201D for special procurement.
    I am not able to make sense of special procurement U: Stock Transfer (in the MRP 2 view of the R/3 material master record),
    Is this Special procurement some sort of customization as i could not find U: Stock Transfer  in my implementation.
    Please help me understand this. What exactly should i do to create TL between Plants automaticcaly through Cif.

    You need to define setting in IMG for this from source to Target location.
    Follow this path :
    Production->Material Requirements ->Master Data->Define Special Procurement Type
    example :
    Plant      1004
    SP type    40   Stock transfer (proc.from alter.plant)
    Procurement type     F    External procurement
    Special procurement  U    Stock transfer
    Plant                1039
    Manish

  • ERROR: transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use

    Hey guys,
    I created 2 WL 10.3 Domains. I can start the admin server in domain but when I start the second admin server i get the following error:
    starting weblogic with Java version:
    ERROR: transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use
    ERROR: JDWP Transport dt_socket failed to initialize, TRANSPORT_INIT(510)
    JDWP exit error AGENT_ERROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197): No transports initialized [../.
    ./../src/share/back/debugInit.c:690]
    FATAL ERROR in native method: JDWP No transports initialized, jvmtiError=AGENT_E
    RROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197)
    Starting WLS with line:
    C:\bea\JDK160~1\bin\java -client -Xdebug -Xnoagent -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket
    ,address=8453,server=y,suspend=n -Djava.compiler=NONE -Xms512m -Xmx512m -XX:Com
    pileThreshold=8000 -XX:PermSize=48m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m
    -Xverify:none -Xverify:none -da:org.apache.xmlbeans... -ea -da:com.bea... -da:
    javelin... -da:weblogic... -ea:com.bea.wli... -ea:com.bea.broker... -ea:com.bea.
    sbconsole... -Dplatform.home=C:\bea\WLSERV~1.3 -Dwls.home=C:\bea\WLSERV~1.3\serv
    er -Dweblogic.home=C:\bea\WLSERV~1.3\server -Dweblogic.management.discover=tru
    e -Dwlw.iterativeDev=true -Dwlw.testConsole=true -Dwlw.logErrorsToConsole=true
    -Dweblogic.ext.dirs=C:\bea\patch_wlw1030\profiles\default\sysext_manifest_classp
    ath;C:\bea\patch_wls1030\profiles\default\sysext_manifest_classpath;C:\bea\patch
    cie670\profiles\default\sysextmanifest_classpath;C:\bea\patch_alsb1031\profile
    s\default\sysext_manifest_classpath -Dweblogic.Name=TestAdmin2 -Djava.security.p
    olicy=C:\bea\WLSERV~1.3\server\lib\weblogic.policy weblogic.Server
    ERROR: transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use
    ERROR: JDWP Transport dt_socket failed to initialize, TRANSPORT_INIT(510)
    JDWP exit error AGENT_ERROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197): No transports initialized [../.
    ./../src/share/back/debugInit.c:690]
    FATAL ERROR in native method: JDWP No transports initialized, jvmtiError=AGENT_E
    RROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197)
    Stopping PointBase server...
    I changed the port address of both admins but I dont' think that's the issue. Can someone tell me whats going on.
    Thanks

    Hi
    Iam getting the Same Error , Can you provide me some information on what changes did you made to the setDomainEnv.cmd file to make this work
    thanks in advance

Maybe you are looking for

  • Creating Radio Button on Module pool Screen

    Hi Gurus, I am currently working on a program which involves module pool selection screen. In my selection screen i have placed 2 radio buttons, i have kept these radio buttons in same group. But when i am running the program both the radio buttons a

  • Do search engines make use of IPTC Core metadata?

    I'm using Bridge to organise a large group of maps (the maps are JPEG images), which will be published on my organisation's website. These maps are about niche topics and very specific areas of the UK. I'm wondering if there are any SEO benefits from

  • Bad colors in Vim

    Hello, My problem is that colors for Molokai color-schema in Vim doesn't look exactly the same as in screenshot. Molokai isn't the only color-scheme for me that looks kinda weird and I think that's somehow related to terminal support for 256 colors.

  • Restarting SC WF after "No approver found RR_REPORTING_LINE_UNIT BUS2121"

    Hello, We are running SRM 7 SP10 with BRF WFs. One of the Process level points out at an Org unit. This org unit was no user so we got an error message : No approver found RR_REPORTING_LINE_UNIT BUS2121 in Application Monitor / Approver assignment. W

  • BR 1310 tracert response

    I have a  small network with 2 x BR 1310's. Home site islinked to first(root) 1310 with fibre; then wireless link 1km to customer site with second 1310; at customer site CAT5/6 to Sonic Wall (Dell); then customer switch; then Video/Voice over IP. The