SXMS_CONF_ITEMS
hi
under component monitoring, under self ping test, I see four options. One is does the Integration engine know the buisness system ? Another is Are roles in SXMX_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent ? What exactly do these tests mean ? When do we use these tests ?
Midhun
Hi Midhun
Go to
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/a5/1b5342d8a7be30e10000000a155106/content.htm
What exactly do these tests mean ? When do we use these tests ?
These tests are useful while installation, Adding Business system etc in your SLD, Installing new SP on PI server.
Hope this clear your doubts.
Thanks
Gaurav
Similar Messages
-
Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent?
hello!
i installed and configured my new XI system.
when i go in Runtime Workbench (via browser) i see an error in result of Integration Engine monitor .
"Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent?"
i check all in SLD and i think is ok.
have you any suggestion?
thanks
AlexThe role of a business system is defined centrally in the SLD.
However, you can overwrite this setting locally in the table SXMS_CONF_ITEMS.
This test checks whether the role descriptions are consistent. If not, the locally defined role is used at runtime.
if helpful reward points are appreciated -
Role for business system defined in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS'
hi
in RWB integration engine status is red in detail it is showing.
'No role for business system defined in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS'.
how can i fix this.
regards,
krushiHI
Runtime Workbench - Integration Engine
Are the Roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and the SLD Consistent?
//***The role of a business system is defined centrally in the SLD. However, you can overwrite this setting locally in the table SXMS_CONF_ITEMS.
This test checks whether the role descriptions are consistent. If not, the locally defined role is used at runtime.
extract taken from this thread
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/a5/1b5342d8a7be30e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Message was edited by:
Anusha Ramsiva -
No role for business system defined in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS
Hi Experts.
I have the following problem. We were set up the XI in our company and now we are trying to configure and run it propertly. We had some problems so far and now there is the next one: I configured the simple scenario FILE-XI-FILE but it doesn't work <b>:(</b>. Every step from the scenario was completed successfully (after some problems) but when I have started runtime Workbench (RWB) in order to monitor the functionality of XI and I choosed <b>Component Monitoring | Components | Integration Server | Integration Engine GPI</b> I see that I have an error in Self-Test Status | <b>Are roles in SXML_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent</b>? In detail it's <b>No role for business system defined in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS</b>. My business and technical systems look to be well configured but now I'm hopeless because I can't find nothing more specific about <b>SXMS_CONF_ITEMS</b> table. I tried some notes and threads from the forum but nothing helped me after all. So please help if someone has an experience with something similar. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks
OndrejHi,
The role of a business system is defined centrally in the SLD. However, you can overwrite this setting locally in the table SXMS_CONF_ITEMS.
This test checks whether the role descriptions are consistent. If not, the locally defined role is used at runtime.
Check in transaction SXMB_ADM -> integration engine configuration a parameter (Corresponding Integ. Server) if all parameters are correct n not lost.
refer : http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a5/1b5342d8a7be30e10000000a155106/content.htm
Runtime Workbench - Integration Engine
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/70/58b43be7492354e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Regards
Aashish Sinha
PS : reward points if helpful -
SXMS_CONF_ITEMS error in PI 7.10
Hello,
We installed new PI 7.10 and consulting Readiness Check to configure it.
In RWB integration engine status is RED in detail it is showing. No role for business system defined in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS.
As well as Central CCMS monitor not available
How can i fix this.
Thanks
RhishabhHi Rhishabh
Check in trx sxmb_admin
-> Integration Engine Configuration
-> Role of Business System (should be Integration Server)
-> Corresponding Integ. Server (should be left empty or contain the Integration Server URL)
"As well as Central CCMS monitor not available" - this is because CCMS is not configured in this system yet. If you wish to use CCMS then you will need to configure it.
Regards
Mark -
Runtime Workbench Proxy Runtime Configuration
Hi
I'm trying to setup the RWB proxy runtime configuration. However our ERP system shows up as an ALE-Logical system and not a Business System in the Configuration tab of the RWB and doesnt appear at all in the Component Monitoring tab so we cant monitor messages from it through the RWB.
We've tried deleting the business and technical system and re-registering them with RZ70 as well doing a CPA Cache refresh. But that hasnt resolved the issue.
I have compared this system to another system in the SLD which does show up as a Business System and can be monitored through Component Monitoring. They seem to be exactly the same.
Is there some kind of setting we are missing on the ERP system?
Thanks
RiazHi Riaz & kesava,
RWB Proxy runtime setup can be seen from RWB->Component Monitoring under Components section Domain XI->Integration Engine.
Check the following
1)Can the SLD be reached? - RFC destination, ping, getLCR server, read cache, BS defined
2) Does the Integration Engine know the business system? - Business system name = BS_100, Role = Application System
3)Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent? - Role = Application System
4)Has an Integration Server destination been defined? Destination 'XIabcd100' to the Integration Server
Cheers
Veera -
Error "system not configured as xmb" in transaction "sxmb_moni"
Hi,
when I send an IDoc from R3 to XI I get this error:
system not configured as xmb" in transaction "sxmb_moni"
also, in the adaptermonitor of the runtime workbench there is an error in the integration engine.
"no rules for business-system are definied in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS"
This error refers from a another error in transaction idx. so, we have assigned the integration engine client 100, because we work with this client. So, we can start transaction idx5 but, we get the other error, as mentioned.
Can anybody help me please?
Regards
StefanHi Stefen,
try to chk SLD-->Business systems...and check the role of business system Web AS ABAP (tht was created during installation)...check if the role is integration server if not try sxi_cache and in the menu tool bar goto "GoTo" and click AE cache and see if the link is fine
pls chk for this links
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ceba9b90-0201-0010-9687-a8b279e388bb
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/909760cb-0ec8-2a10-4a96-ee8417acfbc9
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/909760cb-0ec8-2a10-4a96-ee8417acfbc9
if found worth pls do the req
Thanx
Sampath -
Integration Engine does not connect with SLD
Hi all,
We have an XI 3.0 system that acts as QUA system in our track. This XI 3.0 system is connected to a central SLD installed on a PI 7.1 system that acts as our DEV system.
Everything seems to be OK in the Java part. We refresh the caches successfully and enter the SLD in DEV system.
We have a problem, though with the SXI_CACHE transaction. It shows the following message:
"Unable to refresh cache contents.Error during last attempt to refresh cache"
And the detail of the error is: "LCR_GET_OWN_BUSINESS_SYSTEM - NO_BUSINESS_SYSTEM"
We have checked in the SLD and the Business system is created.
In transaction SXMB_ADM when checking the Integration Engine connection with SLD we get the following error: "No access to system landscape at present"
In the Runtime Workbench of the system, when checking the Cache Connection, the Integration Engine part shows a warning. In the RWB also the Self Status Check of the Integration Engine gives errors:
"Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent?"
We have already followed all the post installation guides, and the cache checks, and SLD checks guides.
Do you know which the soltion could be for our error??
Thanks!Hi,
We have checkes
SM59: TCP/IP Destination: LCRSAPRFC y SAPLSDAPI. check the program ID is correct.--> connection test goes OK
HTTP destination: INTEGRATION_DIRECTORY_HMI: do a test connection: result=500--> connection test gives us 500 result
SLDAPICUST: Check the user and password and the server defined. the PI server should be the main server.--> checked, OK
SXMB_ADM>Integration Engine Configuration: Check if the destination is properly defined. should be dest://http://<server><port>/sap/xi/engine?type=entry> checked. OK
Check RZ70: wich configuration you have there?--> The configuration in the RZ70 for the SLD is pointing to the DEV system, so it is correct
SLDCHECK results:
"Properties of RFC destination SAPSLDAPI
RFC host: %%RFCSERVER%%
program id: SAPSLDAPI_XXX
gateway host: XXXX
gateway service: XXXXX
Testing the RFC connection to the SLD java client...
RFC ping was successful
SLD server access settings:
host name: XXXXX
port number: 50000
user : XIAPPLUSER
Use transaction SLDAPICUST if you wish to maintain the SLD server access data
Launching the SLD GUI in a separate browser window...
=> Verify in the browser GUI that the SLD is in a healthy running state!
Calling function LCR_LIST_BUSINESS_SYSTEMS
Retrieving data from the SLD server...
Function call terminated sucessfully
List of business systems maintained in the SLD:
(...more...)
Calling function LCR_GET_OWN_BUSINESS_SYSTEM
Retrieving data from the SLD server...
No corresponding business system found for system XXX client 450
=> Check and maintain the SLD content for the current client
Summary: Connection to SLD works technically, but the SLD content may need maintenance
=> Check and maintain the SLD data content
*Unable to refresh cache contents.Error during last attempt to refresh cache" * this error is related with the RFC destination type HTTP. ( HTTP destination: INTEGRATION_DIRECTORY_HMI: do a test connection: result=500) -
Proxy Runtime errors in Integration Engines at RWB
Hi Experts,
We have configured the point to point configuration scenario in our landscape. I have two ABAP systems exchanges data using PI. I have configured both the ABAP systems as Application Systems and Corresponding Integration server as my PI system.
In RWB of PI I can see both these systems as proxy run time under Integration Engines, but are in error status.
Path to the same is Component Monitoring>Components>Integration Engines (here I can my systems as Proxy Runtime BSAB200, Proxy Runtime BSID200).
When run the test got the below error.
Can the SLD be reached? RFC destination LCRSAPRFC does not exist
Does the Integration Engine know the business system?
Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent?
Why do we need to create the RFC destination again when we select the related integration server as PI.
Can any one throw some light whey are these errors are occured.
Thanks,
ChinnaCan the SLD be reached? RFC destination LCRSAPRFC does not exist
Reached to SLD but not to exchange profile.
Does the Integration Engine know the business system?
Yes.
Why do we need to create the RFC destination again when we select the related integration server as PI.
A central SLD scenario involves a central SLD, but not a central exchange profile.
The exchange profile used is always the one on the Integration Server the
application system connects to the exchange profile using the SM59 destination
LCRSAPRFC.
Regards
Pothana -
RWB Component Monitoring - Cache Connectivity Test failure
Hi,
I have done the Cache Connectivity test in RWB-Component monitoring.
For the Integration Server - Integration Engine XYZ.
I am getting error
Result of Self-Test
Can the SLD be reached? ... Details OK
Does the Integration Engine know the business system? ... Details OK
Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent? ... Details Error
Is Web service security available? ... Details
The error message os
Details for 'Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent?'
Inconsistent roles. System Landscape: Integration Server. SXMSGLOBAL: Application System
How to solve this issue.
Regards
FarhatHi
Use Tcode SXMB_ADM -> integration engine ,Assign proper Client to Integration Server.
look this similar thread
Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent? -
ECC Connectivity Error from RWB (SXMB_CONF_ITEMS)
We are able to connect PI 7.1 to ECC 6.0 on our QA server successfully however when we attempt to connect to the ECC 6.0 on Prod we get the following errors from the RWB
Errors:
Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD Consistant? RED
Has an integration server destination been defined ? RED
Function SXMB_GET_IS_ENDPOINT failed (return code = 1)
Resolutions Attempeted:
1) In PI 7.1 We have created TS and BS for the production ECC 6. We get the above error in RWB.
Result: Works in QA. Green Lights in RWB when we point it to QA ECC system (create TS and BS for the QA ECC 6 system).
2) We checked the corresponding role for the business system as Intgration Server in SXMB_ADM and SLD Pipeline URL in Integration_server_xxx BS.
We cleared cache and rebooted system twice. We have the same settings in Prod however for some reason its not applying successfully.
3) We have the appropriate roles and profiles set for PIRWBUSER on the ECC side and PI side.
Could anyone please give me some clues to fix. Thank you for your time in advance.Thanks.
We just fixed this.
We set the Role of Business system as Application System in SXMB_ADM in Production ECC system to fix. -
Component Monitoring Issue: Message: Unable to log on to system XYZ
Hi,
I have installed PI 700 with SID ABC and configured with R/3 system SID XYZ.
Now while checking Component Monitoring-->Integration Engines--->Proxy Runtime XYZ I am getting following error.
Message: Unable to log on to system XYZ in language en with user PIRWBUSER
Stacktrace:
com.sap.aii.rwb.exceptions.OperationFailedException: Unable to log on to system ID6 in language en with user PIRWBUSER
at com.sap.aii.rwb.core.XIAbapRTCComponent.getConnector(XIAbapRTCComponent.java:114)
at com.sap.aii.rwb.core.XIRTCComponent.selftest(XIRTCComponent.java:303)
at com.sap.aii.rwb.web.componentmonitoring.model.CompTestModel.doSelftest(CompTestModel.java:608)
at com.sap.aii.rwb.web.componentmonitoring.viewcontroller.CmDynPage.doSelftest(CmDynPage.java:304)
at com.sap.aii.rwb.web.componentmonitoring.viewcontroller.CmDynPage.updateTests(CmDynPage.java:375)
at com.sap.aii.rwb.web.componentmonitoring.viewcontroller.CmDynPage.selectNode(CmDynPage.java:388)
at com.sap.aii.rwb.web.componentmonitoring.viewcontroller.CmDynPage.process_treeClick(CmDynPage.java:339)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
And if I create user PIRWBUSER in my R/3 system XYZ, I get different kind of error.
Details for 'Can the SLD be reached?'
SLD ping gets exception: Error when opening an RFC connection
Under Message Monitoring below is the error:
com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.UnexpectedException: Internal Error: An unexpected error occurred (java.lang.NullPointerException: null)
Can anyone have a look and guide me how to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
ManishHi Prateek,
I have already created PIRWBUSER in my R/3 system as I have mentioned in my first post. After that I am getting error for Proxy Runtime XYZ as below:
Result of Self-Test
Can the SLD be reached? (Failed) ... Details
Does the Integration Engine know the business system? ... Details (Successful)
Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent? ... Details (Successful)
Has an Integration Server destination been defined? ... Details (Successful)
Details for 'Can the SLD be reached?'
SLD ping gets exception: Error when opening an RFC connection
What else I have to do in this case?
Thanks & Regards,
Manish -
Hi,
I'm trying to publish idocs from SAP HR to XI, but I can only see the Idocs in HR with status 3(Data passed to port OK)and not in XI environment.
I already confirmed:
at SAP HR,
- RFC destinations(SM59),
- Transactional port(WE21),
- Partner agreement(WE20),
- Logical System for above Partner agreement(BD54),
- EDIDC header recipient port & LS name is OK(WE19).
at SAP XI,
- RFC destinations(SM59),
- Transactional port(WE21),
- technical and business system for sender SAP system(System Landscape Directory),
Do you guys know what could be missing? or what I should check?
Thanks in advance,
LuíHi,
At WE19, when we do a standard outbound processing, it retrieves the following warning:
"IDoc 0000000000200079 was saved but cannot or should not be sent"
I already confirmed that transactional ports and partners are OK. At SM58 in both machines, don't have records.
At Runtime Workbench, I find out, that Result of Self-Test retrieves the following messages:
- Can the SLD be reached?
"RFC destination LCRSAPRFC does not exist"
- Does the Integration Engine know the business system?
"Function LCR_GET_OWN_BUSINESS_SYSTEM failed (return code = 1)"
- Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent?
"No role for business system defined in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS"
Do you guys know what means the above warnings/errors? Could be missing some environment configuration?
Thank you
Luí -
Runtime Workbench - Proxy Runtime
In the Runtime Workbench, I got an error status in the component "Proxy Runtime".
Result of Self-Test:
Can the SLD be reached? (successful)
Does the Integration Engine know the business system? (error)
Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent? (error)
Details:
Tested: RFC destination, ping, getLCR server, read cache, BS defined
Function LCR_GET_OWN_BUSINESS_SYSTEM failed (return code = 1)
No role for business system defined in System Landscape
Can anyone tell me how to solve this problem?Hi,
This basically means that your back end system where you generate your proxy, was NOT registered in SLD properly.
Proceed as follows in SLD:
1. If your system has not been registered as a technical system, you will have to register it using transaction RZ70 (Prior to that, you also need to make sure the RFC destination SLD_UC has been properly configured to point to your SLD program registered in PI gateway )
2. Create your business system referring to the technical system above, pointing to the client where you want to generate your proxy.
Hope it helps,
Lim... -
Hi,
I am using a ABAP Proxy to push the data into the BW system. In the RWB, the following listed is <b>RED</b> in colour.
Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent?
pls can anyone help in solving this.
Thnkz n regards,
AnupHi Manish,
Thanks for your response. I did re-generated it and activated it .. initially after seeing that its inactive and everything looked fine..
The interesting part is I am able to see the output properly in the Response tab but the same isn't sent to PI ..
Pls advice
Regards
RK
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I display a constant 1 hour of data in my VI
I am currently designing a VI which reads data from a spreadsheet which is being updated from another source. I currently have my VI reading the information and displaying it on waveform charts. I have 13 sample points each of which has a chart of it
-
Hello, I have noticed that my Firefox has been crashing quite often over the last 2 weeks. Now as of this morning my several Book Marks that I use daily have disappeared ... Please help me to restore this . Awaiting a response Thank you
-
Migrate Starter Album to Element 12
I have Adobe Photoshop Element 12 installed on my new computer (Windows 8) but how do I import the album structure organizing my 4,000 photos in Adobe Photoshop Album Starter Edition 3.0 from my old computer (Windows XP)?
-
Select data from tab 1 that are not in tab 2
hi, i want to select data (mnr, date) from tab1, which are not in tab2! what would be the best select-statement for this problem. select mnr, date from tab1 where ...???
-
WD MyBook or My Book unmounting randomly
I work for a Mac Support company in NYC, where we setup/teach/troubleshoot for homes or small businesses all over the city. However, I'm stumped by some recent issues with the WD 1TB My Book drives we've been purchasing for clients. In the past, WD h