Sync / Async Bridge without BPM

Hi All,
I was trying to implement the Sync / Async Bridge without the BPM. I am trying a HTTP to JMS Sync / Async Bridge. I have followed the following link and done exactly the same as shown in the document
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/EN/45/20d2b4c20a0732e10000000a155369/content.htm
I have used a Java application which will poll the request queue and then place the message in the response queue with the same correlation ID frm the request queue.
After following the above link the response message was not appearing, the message were going to deilvering status and after some time i found that they were cancelled without errors
I searched in the forums for many solutions but what i found was this thread which stated that since the XI message ID is 32 bytes and Correlation ID is only 24 bytes its difficult for Modules to identify the response since the correlation is truncated.
JMS: Synch/Async bridge - how to configure
I tried changing the configuration in the reciver JMS channel to XI Conversion ID instead of Message ID and this also doesnt give me fruitfull results. The message was not being placed in the request queue, it gave an error saying that the conversion id was null. Though in the thread it seems to have worked for him.
After this i planned to dynamically generate a Correlation ID (a dummy one) of 24bytes and i sent it to the request queue this time the message was retrived from the response queue only to find that the correlation ID this time has been converted to some other format
Corrletion ID sent to the request queue: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWX
Corrlation ID coming in the response queue : 4142434445464748494a4b4c4d4e4f505152535455565758
Can anyone put some light on what i exactly need to do or tell me why the conversion ID worked for Daneil in the thread and it gave me an error saying that the Conversion id is null
Rgds
Aditya

Hi Prateek,
This is what was tried in my first case. I did exactly what was given in that link.But since the Message id being 32 bytes and length of correlation id is 24 bytes id is getting truncated.
So its not working fine.
@ke i am having a look at the note will update you on this
Thanks for your response
Rgds
Aditya

Similar Messages

  • Async-Sync-Async Bridge Without BPM

    HI Folks,
    I have a requirement as
    u201CAn Asynchronous SOAP request is triggered to PI and then should get records from a (JDBC)database and write the result to a fileu201D
    It is of Aync-Sync-Async Bridge and i have to do without BPM
    I know by using some module parameters at sender communication channel we can do this.
    But my query
    1)Is that for SOAP sender communication channel can we provide the same module parameters
    Number - ModuleName - Type - ModuleKey
    1- AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean - Local Enterprise Bean - 1
    2- CallSapAdapter-Local Enterprise Bean - 2
    3-AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean-3
    Parameters
    ModuleKey - ParameterName - ParameterValue
    1 - passThrough - true
    3-receiverChannel - Receiver File Adapter Name
    3-receiverService - Receiver Business Service/ System
    2) Does the SOAP support the without BPM scenarios
    3)Scenario is like Soap --> JDBC -->File (Async - Sync - Async) and how abt for Soap --> RFC -->File (Async - Sync - Async)
    Thanks in Advance
    Lemon

    For your requirement , you can handle this scenario without BPM in two ways.
    1) Async sync bridge without BPM.   You are going to use request response bean and one way response bean module to achieve this. very simple. See this [link|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/File-RFC-File(Without%20BPM)]
    In the sender SOAP channel you have to configure first request response bean, second callsapadapter and third onewayresponse bean. Refer this link. Simply follow file sender configuration for your soap sender or RFC sender.
    Note: one receiver agreement , one receiver determination, one interface determination. only two receiver channels one jdbc and one file.
    2) You can create SOAP  to File asynchronous.  Using quality of service  EO and creating service interface asynchronous mode.   In the mapping area do JDBC lookup.  If your version is 7.1 then this lookup is available. This is pretty simple no need to do async to sync pattern.
    Hope that helps.

  • Correlation issue in JMS adapter - SYNC/ASYNC scenario without BPM

    Hi,
    I am working on a SYNC/ASYNC scenario with JMS adapter without using BPM. My scenario is SOAP<>PI>JMS. I configured the interface as below:
    1. SOAP Sender channel
    2. JMS Receiver Channel writing to Queue A.
         Module used:      a. RequestOneWayBean
                   b. WaitResponseBean
         Correlation Settings:
                   a. Set JMS Correlation ID to "XI Message ID"
                   b. Store JMS CorrelationID of request (Checked)
                   c. Set JMS Property to "JMS Correlation Id"
                   d. Value = "XI MEssage ID"
    3. JMS Sender channel reading from queue B ( I am exporting the message from queue A and importing into queue B)
         Module used:      a. NotifyResponseBean
         Correlation Settings:
                   a. Set XI MEssage Id to "GUID"
                   b. Set XI Conversation ID to "Stored JMS COrrelationID of Request"
    I can see the cid in the message from queue A. But I observed thhat the header format of the message in Queue A is "MQSTR".
    ISSUE:
    1. While writing the message to queue A, below adapter log details(part b) concerned me:
         a. Message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6' successfully processed by channel
         b. Could not create acknowledgements for message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6'
    I am not sure why I am receiving the message that "  could not create acknowledgements"
    2. While reading the message from the sender channel,I consistently get the error message as below:
         a. XI message ID corresponding to JMS message with ID 'ID:414d51205341504449442e514d202020c67b954b20005602'
              will be created as a new GUID with value '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'
         b. Error while processing message '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58';  detailed error description:
              com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
              found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
    Below are the blogs which I have already gone through:
    1. JMS Synchronous Scenario without BPM - Correlation Settings and Transactional JMS Session
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b028f6f6-7da5-2a10-19bd-cf322cf5ae7b
    2. Note: 1086303
    3. Sync / Async Bridge without BPM
    In the note, they mentioned something about header being "MQRFH2". BUt in our case, the header is "MSSTR". Not sure whether it makes any difference.
    Please help.
    Edited by: GP on Mar 9, 2010 4:24 AM

    Hi,
    detailed error description:
    com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
    found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
    This error would generally arose when there are multiple messages, got stuck in the outbound queue. Try to stop both the sender and receiver JMS comunication channels and clear both the inbound and outbound queues.
    Once all the messages in the queue are cleraed, try posting the message again.
    Regards,
    Swetha.

  • Sync/Async Bridge without Asynchronous Send / Receive Steps

    Hello together,
    we have a synchronous HTTP <--> RFC Scenario using a sync/async Bridge in BPM with the following characteristics:
    1. HTTP Payload is received (opens Sync/Async bridge)
    2.  lookup is done in an LDAP System (we use an UDF here)
    3. Customzied JCo is called which takes the XML String as input parameter (done by Java Mapping)
    4. Return Value of JCo then is delivered back to HTTP Client (closes Sync/Async Bridge)
    --> No RFC Adapter is used here as the provided JCo does all the parsing
    When testing the sync/async bridge is started but we receive an timeout after 30 sec.
    Could it be that the sync/async required exactly a pair of async send and receive steps (which we do not have in our scenario and which we do not need)?
    This would be a problem, as we have to use BPM in this synchronous scenario. Do you have any idea?
    Thank you very much for your help.

    Thank you for your reply, but I think you misunderstood me. Please let me try to clarify once more:
    1. Synchronous HTTP Sender Interface (Request/Response) opens Sync/Async Bridge
    2. LDAP Lookup is done by UDF using the Request Message in Transformation Step
    3. Switch is done based on result of Lookup
    4. Branch 1 in switch calls customized JCo with Java Mapping in Transformation Step (Request Message as input, Response message as output)
    5. Response message (delivered from JCo Call) should close the Async/Sync Bridge and be send back to HTTP Sender
    --> We have no async send / receive steps in this scenario.
    The customized Jco has been provided by an external partner as there is lots of parsing logic implemented. So we want to connect to the backend SAP system using this JCo and not via a  send step.
    My key qestion is therefore: Is it absolutely necessary to use exactly a pair of async send / receive steps in a sync/async bridge?
    In this case we have to look for another design concept without BPM which would make the solution very difficult I think....

  • Doubt on Sync-Async  bridge using BPM

    Hi Experts,
                     I had a doubt on Sync-Async  bridge using BPM,
       1. If sender system is SAP system and receiver system is non-sap system then while configuring in Integration Directory how many  Receiver Determinations should be done ?
    2.Plz explain if we have 2 receivers i.e one sender SAP system and 2 non-sap systems then what will be the no. of receiver determinations?
    3.How we have to count no. of receiver determinations if we have 2 receivers and 1 receiver system? If so what is the no. of receiver determinations in case of 1 receiver syst and 2 receiver systems?
    Plz clarify above questions  good answers will be definetly rewarded.
                                                                                    Regards,
                                                                                    Vinod.

    vinod,
    ... Sync-Async bridge and Recievr determination are not related....
    Sync-Async bridge means.. u r sending some request syncronously...and u r expecting the response also in synchronous way... but u r not getting the response  directly...u r getting it via BPM..i.e asynchornously.....
    see here what is the  Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
    /people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi
    and here if u have 2 reciver... u have to create 2 receiver determination and ofcourse for BPM one reciver dtrmination is required.... since in BPM related scenario BPM will act as a reciver...BPM(IP) wil first recive the message then it will be forwarded to Receiver system!!! so total 3.
    <b>3.How we have to count no. of receiver determinations if we have 2 receivers and 1 receiver system? If so what is the no. of receiver determinations in case of 1 receiver syst and 2 receiver systems?</b>
    r u telling that u r having two recivers and each receiver is receiving messages using 2 interaces???
    u have 2 use 2 receiver determination and 4 interface determination.
    regards
    biplab

  • Sync/Async JMS without BPM - No receiver specified in message object

    Hi All,
    My scenario is Proxy - JMS - Proxy.  I have chosen to do this without BPM and had followed closely to the instructions given in various help documents/blog/forum threads.  During testing, the proxy returns a system fault 'No receiver specified in message object'.  In RWB it indicates that the correlation is correct and the JMS Receiver adapter is getting the response, below is part of the audit log:
    2009-08-03 18:12:32 Information WRB: retrieving the message for de80831d-97f5-08f1-bdaf-00145e6883af ...
    2009-08-03 18:12:33 Information WRB: retrieved the message: ApplicationResponse
    2009-08-03 18:12:33 Information WRB: leaving WaitResponseBean
    2009-08-03 18:12:33 Information MP: leaving
    2009-08-03 18:12:33 Information The message was successfully delivered to the application using connection JMS_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
    2009-08-03 18:12:33 Information The message status was set to DLVD.
    When I check SXMB_MONI in XI-ABAP, I see 2 messages with status 'System Error - Restart not possible' and 1 with status 'Log Version'.  The message with status 'Log Version' is the respond.  The other 2 messages has the following error:
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Request Message Mapping
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="MAPPING">NO_RECEIVER</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:Stack>No receiver specified in message object</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    It seem to me that the system does not know where to go/what to do next after returning to the JMS Receiver adapter.  I am at a lost what could have gone wrong.  Here is how I've done my configuration.
    Repository
    - Sync Sender Interface for R/3 Backend
    - Sync Receiver Interface for MQ
    - Async Sender Interface for the reply
    Directory
    - 1 CC for JMS Recevier
    - 1 CC for JMS Sender (for the respond)
    - 1 CC for Proxy Sender
    - 1 Interface Determination
    - 1 Receiver Determination
    - 1 Receiver Agreement for JMS Receiver
    - 1 Sender Agreement for the reply
    Any help is appreciated.  Thanks.

    Hi Prateek,
    This is what was tried in my first case. I did exactly what was given in that link.But since the Message id being 32 bytes and length of correlation id is 24 bytes id is getting truncated.
    So its not working fine.
    @ke i am having a look at the note will update you on this
    Thanks for your response
    Rgds
    Aditya

  • Sync/Async bridge

    Hey
    My task is to have an Idoc sent to a Web Service. I have heard that this can be solved using a sync/async bridge in BPM, but from what I can read (help.sap.com) it always say that the first receive step is from a synchronous application. My question is then: Can I use the sync/async bridge to call a web service - i.e. changing from asynchronous (Idoc) to synchronous (WS call)?
    Anyone knows a blog that shows some good examples of sync/async communication? I have read the inital blogs on BPM, but not found anyone good at async/sync communiation...
    thanks a lot!
    regards Marianne

    Hi,
    If you want to receive the response from Webservice means you need to use BPM here.
    Otherwise no need of any BPM,
    That too if u want to response from WS also u dont require any Sync/Async Step here.
    You can configure the BPM with Async receive-Sync Send-Async Send
    REgards
    Seshagiri

  • Sync async bridge configuration

    Hi,
    I am doing one sync to sync scenario using sync/async  bridge in BPM,I am posting one message from HTTP client.
    I am receiving the synchronous message inside bpm and opened sync aysnc bridge.
    Then I need to do some transformations,
    after transformation step I am closing sync/async bridge and sending the message back to sender system.
    I have created repository objects,
    while configuring directory objects,
    I have run wizard once between sender and BPM and do i need to run wizard again?
    please explain me about configuration (ID objects)?
    Thanks
    Best Regards,
    Harleen Kaur Chadha

    Hi Harleen,
       Check this below blog,its very useful for ur requirement.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10c73036-f019-2b10-20bc-f15a25be9588
    Regards,
    Skumar

  • REG : SYNC/ASYNC bridge

    Hi all,
                 I have a scenario where my sender is a syncronus and receiver is asyncronus. I have used sync/async bridge in BPM to acheive this.But when i send the input data from runtime workbench with QOS as BEST EFFORT i  got the following error " Error While sending the message". When checked in moni, the data has sucessfully sent to the receiver and in the BPM flow is failing at the last step (ie SEND step which sents syncronus respose and which ends the bridge)
    The steps i used in BPM are
    RECEIVE(start of sync/async bridge)--> SEND(which sends data to receiver)--
    >SEND(which ends the sync/asynbridge) The response that i send is same which i receive(input data) , so i didnot use any  step for response .
    I ran the wizard for 2 times :
    1) from my source to BPM in which is syncronus.
    2)from BPM to receiver which is asyncronus.
    Can anyone please provide me solution for the above problem.

    Hi Srinivas,
    In BPM second step,
    Send step it would configure the properties as a " Synchronous". then only response back to the sender.
    Regards,
    sateesh

  • Sync-Async Bridge with Acknowledgment

    Hello Everybody
    I have a Sync-Async Bridge (RFC <-> BPM -> File). I have defined my Asynchronous Send Step in BPM to request acknowledgment from the Receiver File Adapter. The File Adapter returns that acknowledgment but, I would like to check acknowledgment status to define the next step of ccBPM. For example, for negative acknowlegment status I would like to stop/cancel BPM. Is that possible?
    Thanks
    Julio

    Hi Julio !
    SAP Note 837285:
    "Permanent negative acknowledgements: If the BPE receives a
    permanent negative system or application acknowledgment, the
    asynchronous send step waiting for it triggers a system error for
    which you can define an exception handling."
    Put your async send step inside a block and create an exception branch..I think that for the file adapter ack you will need a deadline branch also because if the ack is not received, the BPM will keep waiting for it endlessly.
    Regards,
    Matias.
    Message was edited by:
            Matias Denker

  • Async Sync Bridge without BPM (Proxy-Soap-Idoc)

    Hi,
    I have read some blogs how to do the Async Sync Bridge without BPM for JMS adapters. I have a requirement that I am getting a Async Proxy message to PI and then PI makes Sync Soap call then the result need to send through the Idoc adapter.
    Proxy - Soap- Idoc
    Here Proxy is a sender so no adapter required in the Config and also Soap is java based adapter and Idoc adapter is a ABAP based so I am not sure this is possible but I just wanted to check with you.
    Please let know if this is possible or not?
    PI 7.1 with EHP1
    Thanks,
    Laxman
    Edited by: Laxman  Molugu on Oct 14, 2010 2:15 PM

    The mapping programm can be defined as a user defined function. As sample of mine is "getGoogle()", which is doing some kind of address validation. The input parameter URL[0] contains source address. For that you need to import:
    org.apache.commons.logging.*;
    org.w3c.dom.*;
    javax.xml.parsers.*;
    org.xml.sax.SAXException;
    org.apache.commons.httpclient.*;
    org.apache.commons.httpclient.methods.*;
    org.apache.commons.codec.*;
    org.apache.log4j.*;
    Example code for UDF "getGoogle()" is:
    String sUrl = "http://maps.google.de/maps/api/geocode/xml?address=" + URL[0] + "&sensor=false";
    HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
    GetMethod method = new GetMethod(sUrl);
    byte[] responseBody = null;
        try {
    //      int statusCode = client.executeMethod(method);
    //      byte[] responseBody = method.getResponseBody();
    //     result.addValue(new String(responseBody));
    String sResponse = "initial";
    int statusCode = client.executeMethod(method);
    responseBody = method.getResponseBody();
    ByteArrayInputStream bis = new ByteArrayInputStream(responseBody);
    DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
    DocumentBuilder db = factory.newDocumentBuilder();
    Document doc = db.parse(bis);
    doc.getDocumentElement().normalize();
    NodeList nodeLst = doc.getElementsByTagName("formatted_address");
    Node formAdr = nodeLst.item(0);
    NodeList nlFormAdr = formAdr.getChildNodes();
    sResponse = ((Node) nlFormAdr.item(0)).getNodeValue();
          // Deal with the response.
        result.addValue(sResponse);
        } catch (Exception e) {
          result.addValue(e.toString() + "######## exhrenda - googleResponse:############### URL=" + sUrl+"###########"+new String(responseBody));
        } finally {
          // Release the connection.
          method.releaseConnection();

  • Need help with scenario BPM Http-RFC Sync/async bridge

    hi all!
    i've got the following scenario: HTTP-BPM(XI)-RFC synchronous both of them. for that, i'm using S/A bridge in the BPM, but i'm getting the error 'Timeout condition of pipeline reached'. i think the problem is that the process gets lost in the sync/async communication, because in the trace level shows CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV" and after that every message are 'wait time starting'.
    don't know the reason of the error. Maybe I missed something to configure?
    the BPM is like this:
    Receiver(Open Sync/Async bridge) -> Transformation (mapping from http request to RFC request) -> SyncSend (RFC request and response) -> Transformation (mapping from rfc response to http response) -> Send (Close S/A Bridge)
    the IR is configured like this:
    Message Types u2013 External Definitions u2013 Imported Objects
    mt_cxml_request -> contains xsd of xcml request template.
    mt_cxml_response -> contains xsd of xcml response template.
    zintegracion_pedidos -> imported RFC from R/3
    zintegracion_pedidos.response -> imported RFC from R/3
    Message Interfaces
    mi_cxml_request_async_abs
    mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
    mi_cxml_request_sync_out
    mi_xcml_response_async
    mi_rfc_request_asyn_abs
    mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
    mi_rfc_request_sync_in
    mi_rfc_response_async_abs
    Message Mappings
    mm_cxml_request_to_rfc_request -> mapping from http request (cxml) to rfc request.
    mm_rfc_response_to_cxml_response -> mapping from rfc response to http response (cxml).
    Interface Mappings
    im_cxml_request_async_abs_to_rfc_request_async_abs
    im_rfc_response_async_abs_to_cxml_response_async_abs
    and the ID is configured like this:
    Business system DES -> created business system for RFC adapter with interface mi_rfc_request_sync_in as receiver. Comunication channel u2018RFC Receiveru2019
    Businnes service VW -> created businnes service for HTTP adapter with interface mi_cxml_request_sync_out as sender. Comunication channel u2018HTTP Senderu2019
    Receiver Determination
    two receiver determinations. One for BPM and the other one for RFC(R/3):
    |VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out:
    |BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs:
    Interface Determination
    two interface determinations:
    |VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out | | BPM_PO:
    |BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs | * | * :
    Sender Agreement
    VW
    mi_cxml_request_sync_out
    Receiver Agreement
    |BPM_PO| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_in

    hi all,
    i've removed the transformations from the BPM, and i've created:
    in IR:
    - interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                    source interface: mi_cxml_request-sync_abs
                                    target interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
    in ID:
    - receiver determination: |VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                      sender service: VW
                                      interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                      receiver: DES
                                      interface mapping:im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
    - interface determination: |VW| mi_cxml_erquest_sync_abs ||
                                         sender service: VW
                                         interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                         inbound interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                         interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
    - receiver agreement: |VW| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                   sender service: VW
                                   receiver service: DES
                                   receiver interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
    not sure these are the steps i had to do for mapping xml to rfc. but the result is the same error as before, the timeout.
    i couldn't test with RTW because i'm getting an error 401 unauthorized.
    i'd do it without BPM but the issue is that i wanted to add another step that would be to send the response from rfc to mail too once i got this BPM running. i mean, the response from RFC would be sent to http response and mail both.
    the only way i can imagine to do it is with BPM but i'm really fed up with it.
    thank u very much folks

  • BPM Design using sync-async  bridge

    Hi Arpit,
    Below mentioned is an overview of the process flow which we are trying to implement.
    1. A synchronous interface takes in the request
    2. After the mapping, a file is created
    3. Another file adapter reads this file and sends a message back to the sync interface. This step is to make sure that the file is created
    I'm using a sync-async bridge for this process, since file creation and reading processes are asynchronous and the request/response is synchronous.
    Can somebody help me by telling how to design the BPM. How many send and receive steps are required etc?
    Thanks,
    Sandeep
        | Request  |    |    |       |    |     |    |       |
        |--------->|    |    |       |    |     |    |File   |
    HTTP|          |Sync|--->|Mapping|--->|Async|--->|Adapter|
        |<---------|I/f |<-  |       |    |I/f  |    |(write)|
        | Response |    | |  |       |    |     |    |_______|
                          |                              |
                          |                              |
                          |                          ____|___
                          ||      |   |        |    |        |
                          -|Async |<--|File Adp|<---|Folder  |
                           | I/f  |   |(read)  |    |________|

    Hi
    <i>>>I have to map the incoming xml from HTTP to another format before creating the file.</i>
    Ya then u can use the transform Step in between the
    sync Recv ---> Transform ---> Send to File System
    <i>>>Once a file is read, that interface has to send an acknowledgement message telling the status.</i>
    Wht type of acknowledgement msg telling the status.
    I think u can add another element in ur created file payload like <b>Status</b>: Created (ConstanT)
    Then u can map the payload of the readed file with tis payload having Ststus init.Fo this u need a <b>Transformation</b> Step.
    BTW i was searching some previous blogs and i got this and it is bit related to ur scenario.Go thru this
    /people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi
    Hope it helps.
    Regards
    Arpit Seth

  • BPM - Receive Sync/ASync Bridge Problem

    Hi,
    I am creating a scenario for an inbound Synch request to be serviced by a BPM process.
    Here is the problem that I am facing while trying to configure the Receive Step
    - I created a Message Interface defined as Abstract Synchronous.
    - I created a process model and put in a Receive Step: Mode - Opens S/A Bridge, Synchronous Interface - defined as above.
    - I define a container with Abstract type. But when I try to locate the above defined Abstract Synch message interface, I cannot find it.
    - As a workaround, I create another Abstract Message Interface defined as Abstract ASynch.
    - I create a container with this Abstract ASynch message type.
    - I use this container in the Receive Step.
    But activating the Business Process gives the error:
    Message to be received and Synchronous Interface do not have identical types.
    Can someone give me the correct procedure to configure the Sync / ASync Bridge ? thanks,
    -Manish

    Dan,
    This is the link you are looking for?
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/83/d2a84028c9e469e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm

  • Doubt on Aync-Sync Bridge without BPM

    I created a scenario using Aync-Sync Bridge without BPM:
    File(Asyn) => Rfc:BAPI_PO_CREATE1(Syn)
    1 which mode of message interface should be used in IR for File(Asyn)?
       Asyn or Syn?
    2 if syn MSG interface should be used in the above question,how can i return BAPI_PO_CREATE1.response which includes PO number to the sender?
    BTW:I had maintained the modules and their parameters(AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean and AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean)
    in RFC CC.
    Regards
    Ming

    Hi,
    1) You have to use synchronous interface.
    2) There will two message mappings(one request and one response) and one interface mapping between synchronous interface.
    3) All the corresponding modules should ve added in File sender communication channel not in RFC CC.
    Regards,
    Sudheer
    Message was edited by:
            Sudheer

Maybe you are looking for