Synch-asynch scenario without bpm's?

Synch-asynch scenario without bpmu2019s can any one help me how to configure this scenario without bpms?

hi ferocious,
That is possible with standard functions and standard module beans.
Possiable1:
From pi 7.1 v , sap provided standard functions like RFC and jdbc of the conversion function group.
Possiable2:
sap provided Standard module beans those are RequestResopnceBean and OnewayResponceBean.
thanks,
bhavanisankar.

Similar Messages

Error handling in File - XI - SOAP scenario without BPM

Hello!
We have a File -> XI -> SOAP scenario without BPM. The problem is that if the Web Service sends back an error XI tries to reprocess the same message again and again instead of taking the next one.
We do not want set the retry interval to NULL because most error cases are temporary connection problems and then also those messages would not automatically be reprocessed any more.
We also have to use BE instead of EO, otherwise the Web Service will not return a response. But we need the response to be sure that the processing was successful. The message volume in this scenario is quite high and we do not want to use BPM only for the error handling.
I know that from SP19 some additional adapter modules are available for async - sync scenarios without BPM. I tried to configure it like described in File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19. but it did not solve the problem. Does anybody have any other ideas? Thanks.
Regards, Tanja

Hi Tanja,
>>>The volume is 3000 messages/day on business days and 700 messages/day during weekends but the traffic will increase in the future
I think, you should check that out. It is assumedly only 2 days work to build a scenario:
IDoc -> BP
BP <-> SOAP/HTTP
BP -> IDoc (Acknowledgement)
In the process you need a condition branch, where you decide success or not. You need 2 Interface Mappings for filling the ALEAUD.
Just send 1000 IDocs to the Test-XI and look to performance monitoring at Runtime Workbench, to find out, how many message will be processed in one hour. Assumedly 3000 and more per day should be possible. The advantage would be to reduce number of systems (no file system) and messages (better monitoring) and using the standard (better maintenance).
>>>So you are suggesting I should use HTTP adapter and then add the SOAP header manually in a mapping?
Yes, build the SOAP envelop during the mapping. Most easy is to use XSL or, if your mapping is ready, an additionsal XSL. You can put the error into the Acknowledgement to see it in ERP transaction WE02.
Filling of ALEAUD fields:
E1ADHDR/MESTYP: original message type
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/DOCNUM: original IDoc number
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATUS: 68 in case of error, 53 in case of success
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATXT: Short description for R/3 user what has happend
I ve done such a scenario several times. That works without any problems.
Regards,
Udo

Correlation issue in JMS adapter - SYNC/ASYNC scenario without BPM

Hi,
I am working on a SYNC/ASYNC scenario with JMS adapter without using BPM. My scenario is SOAP<>PI>JMS. I configured the interface as below:
1. SOAP Sender channel
2. JMS Receiver Channel writing to Queue A.
 Module used: a. RequestOneWayBean
 b. WaitResponseBean
 Correlation Settings:
 a. Set JMS Correlation ID to "XI Message ID"
 b. Store JMS CorrelationID of request (Checked)
 c. Set JMS Property to "JMS Correlation Id"
 d. Value = "XI MEssage ID"
3. JMS Sender channel reading from queue B ( I am exporting the message from queue A and importing into queue B)
 Module used: a. NotifyResponseBean
 Correlation Settings:
 a. Set XI MEssage Id to "GUID"
 b. Set XI Conversation ID to "Stored JMS COrrelationID of Request"
I can see the cid in the message from queue A. But I observed thhat the header format of the message in Queue A is "MQSTR".
ISSUE:
1. While writing the message to queue A, below adapter log details(part b) concerned me:
 a. Message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6' successfully processed by channel
 b. Could not create acknowledgements for message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6'
I am not sure why I am receiving the message that " could not create acknowledgements"
2. While reading the message from the sender channel,I consistently get the error message as below:
 a. XI message ID corresponding to JMS message with ID 'ID:414d51205341504449442e514d202020c67b954b20005602'
 will be created as a new GUID with value '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'
 b. Error while processing message '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'; detailed error description:
 com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
 found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
Below are the blogs which I have already gone through:
1. JMS Synchronous Scenario without BPM - Correlation Settings and Transactional JMS Session
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b028f6f6-7da5-2a10-19bd-cf322cf5ae7b
2. Note: 1086303
3. Sync / Async Bridge without BPM
In the note, they mentioned something about header being "MQRFH2". BUt in our case, the header is "MSSTR". Not sure whether it makes any difference.
Please help.
Edited by: GP on Mar 9, 2010 4:24 AM

Hi,
detailed error description:
com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
This error would generally arose when there are multiple messages, got stuck in the outbound queue. Try to stop both the sender and receiver JMS comunication channels and clear both the inbound and outbound queues.
Once all the messages in the queue are cleraed, try posting the message again.
Regards,
Swetha.

SOAP to IDoc scenario without BPM

Hi,
I have 2 scenario's
1) IDoc-SOAP - -response -- IDoc scenario -- (have found some links to do it without BPM)
2) SOAP -- RFC request -- RFC response -- e-mail (no links found)
how can i achive both these scenario's without BPM. Currently i have these 2 scenarios in our 7.1 version with BPM. but our requirement is to migrate this scenario into 7.4 without BPM(No PO).
please help us to achive this scenario without BPM.
Your help is highly appreciated.
thanks,
Praveen

Hi Kiran,
Could you please let us know the exact requirement. How do you want to send the response back to IDOC?
ASync - Sync Bridge with IDOC sender is not possible in PI 7.0.
If It is something like IDOC --> SOAP --> IDOC , And If the SOAP request is small then you can use SOAP Lookup in IDOC to IDOC Scenario.
In The mapping You can do a lookup and get the response from SOAP(Webservice) and map that to your Target IDOC.
This is one possible way for you without BPM in PI7.0.
Please let me know if you need more details about this.
Thanks
Jyothi A

Message Split -- File to Idoc Scenario - ( Without BPM )

I have multiple records coming to XI in a File and I have to create Multiple Idocs to R/3.
Due to Complexity of mapping I'm splitting Maaping step into 2 message Mappings.
A-->B
B-->C
In the 2nd Mapping step I'm doing message Split meaning for each Source record I'm creating multiple Idocs ( To be precise each record on the source becomes 4 idocs in the Target.
2nd Mapping step is as follows
Source 1..1
Sourcerecord 0.. Unbounded
 field1 0..1
 field2 0..1
 filed3 0..1
Target
Message 1
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
 Idoc Structure..
Message 2
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Message 3
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
Message 4
 Idoc 1.. Unbounded
So based on some criteria each record of Source will be mapped to 4 Messages ( 1 each under each Message )
Is it possible to do this without BPM?. Iam sending all these Idocs to same R/3 System.
Thanks for any help..RK

Hi,
See the blog
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
Basicly we have 2 ways of handling such scenarios:
- we can use a block step and send multiple IDOCs from our BPM
- we can also do a little trick and send multiple IDOCs from the XI without a BPM
The first approach is a standard XI approach. It involves the use of a BPM
so the speed of this transfer many not be very good in case you'd like to send
hundreds or thousands of IDOCs in just one call.
The second approach uses a little trick that was mentioned several times
on the XI Froum by a number of XI developers but is still not very clear to the XI newbies.
It allows us to send multiple IDOCs without the use of a BPM. Most probably this will be your choice
if you'd like to use such 1:N (IDOCs) scenarios effectively.
Please see the bwlow threads also..
IDOC Splitting
File To IDOC Thru XI
Multi-Mappings in BPM (XI 3.0)
Please let me know , your prob..is solcev or not..
Regards
Chilla..

Two mappings in one scenario without bpm

Hi,
I am using two different mappings.
Output of one mapping is acting as an input for other mapping i.e source message for second mapping.
Is it possible to do this scenario without using bpm?

hi,
have a look how it works from my weblog:
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/01/xi-xml-node-into-a-string-with-graphical-mapping
you can use any mapping but you need to
be aware how to input and output structures look like:
https://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/weblogs/images/34500/1_xslt_pierwszy.JPG
BTW
target structure is only checked if you use
graphical mapping
if you use abap or java mappings your target structure
will not be checked (if it's valid) as it is with
graphical mapping
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions">XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</a>

Multiple IDOC to Multiple IDOC scenario without BPM steps????

Hi
Could you please give me the solution for this ???
I want steps for sending all IDOCs at a time- ---"Multiple IDOC to Multiple IDOC scenario without using BPM".???
thanks
3nadh

Hello,
Refer the below, for certain details!
/people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2007/01/22/ale-configuration-for-pushing-idocs-from-sap-to-xi ALE configuration for pushing idocs from SAP to XI
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change XI: IDOC bundling - the "trick" with the occurance change
Regards,
Jilan

IDOC to WS Synchronous Scenario Without BPM

Hi Experts,
I am dealing with Idoc to WS synchronous scenario. Can this be done without BPM??
ALEAUD can make IDOC to handle WS response??
Please suggest.
Regards,
Sushama

Please suggest since BPM involves performance issue
BPM surely has performance issue...only when there are a lot of steps/ logic implemented in it and when the processing load is too much for the XI/ PI server to handle.
The BPM design in your case will be just of following steps: Receive --> SyncSend --> AsyncSend .... excluding Transformation...and a BPM with these steps wont cause a big harm to processing of other messages.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Synch/Asynch with out BPM

Hi All,
I have a HTTP to webservice scenario currently running in production , i.e .,
From the HTTP Application user sends a request to XI . XI makes a SOAP call and sends the request back to HTTP Application .
now I have a new requirement to write the SOAP request message to a JMS channel also.
Let me know how is it achievable with out using BPM .
Thanks and Regards,
KLK

Thanks for the replies , I have to clarify my question
Yes my requirement is to send the soap - response to JMS .
The above blog is File - RFC - File ( Asyn/sync) but my requirement is
HTTP - SOAP -- JMS (Syn/Asynch) .
The current scenario in production my o/b and i/b message interface are synchronus .
I need a i/b asynch interface reciepent for the SOAP response .
Let me know your thoughts
Thanks
KLK

JDBC Sync - RFC Sync Scenario without BPM

Hi Experts,
I am using JDBC - RFC - JDBC Scnario. The concept is
JDBC is reading data from tables and send data to RFC, after updating RFC is giving response to JDBC to update its tables.
JDBC - RFC - JDBC.
Is it possible to do this scnario without using BPM?
Experts pls advise me.
Regards
Bala

Hello Bala,
These links are useful to you..
JDBC Sender/Receiver adapter
/people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/19/rdbms-system-integration-using-xi-30-jdbc-senderreceiver-adapter
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/jdbcTOJDBC&
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/7e/5df96381ec72468a00815dd80f8b63/content.htm
Thanks,
Satya

Doubt on Syn/Asyn Bridge scenario without BPM

I followed the how to guide How To Realize a sync-async and async-sync bridge within the Adapter Framework,but issue still exists.
Its a File(QoS:BE)<=>Idoc scenario
1 File adapter sends a sync booking request to idoc(MSG type: FLIGHTBOOKING_CREATEANDRESP)
2 The idoc creates a booking in its system and then sends a async confirmation response(MSG type:
FLIGHTBOOKING_SENDRESPONSE) to the sender(sync file adapter)
In ID, there are 2 receiver determinations and 2 IF determinations for the request and the response.
Sender business system: NWB_FileSystem_XML
Sender CC: Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML
 Parameters Tab
Qos:BE
Poll Interval(secs) : 60
Processing Mode: Delete (Successfully processed files are deleted)
Adapter-Specific Message Attributes: Select File name
Module Tab
Processing Sequence
 AF_Modules/DynamicConfigurationBean 0
 AF_Modules/RequestOnewayBean 1
 CallSapAdapter 2
 AF_Modules/WaitResponseBean 3
Module Configuration
 0 key.0 write http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File FileName
 0 value.0 message.correlationId
 1 passThrough true
 3 timeout 40000
Receiver CC: Dummy_ReceiverChannel_FileXML
 Parameters Tab
 Adapter-Specific Message Attributes: Select File name
Module Tab
Processing Sequence
 AF_Modules/DynamicConfigurationBean 0
 AF_Modules/NotifyResponseBean 1
Module Configuration
 0 key.0 read http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File FileName
 0 value.0 message.correlationId
 1 timeout 40000
Receiver business system: nwb_107
Receiver CC: GeneratedReceiverChannel_Idoc
Agreements
Sender Agreement for NWB_FileSystem_XML uses CC: Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML
Receiver Agreement for NWB_FileSystem_XML uses CC: GeneratedReceiverChannel_Idoc
Receiver Agreement for nwb_107 uses CC: Dummy_ReceiverChannel_FileXML
The problems is:
The scenario only executes once and there are 2 XML messages in SXI_MONITOR with status Processed successfully.One of the message from idoc to file has the Acknowledgement MSG status still awaiting acknowledgement
In the runtime workbench,the status of CC:Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML is correctly configured and started.The latest Processing Details of Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML is 3/13/07 9:13:12 PM Processing started
Regards
Ming

The trace of the message from IDOC to File in SXI_MONITOR:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_INBOUND_XMB" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">User: PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Language: E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">ALE-AUDIT-IDoc-Inbound Handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Inbound-Handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Syntax-Check-Flag X</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Tunnel-Flag</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queueid</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_IDOC_TO_XML">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get the Metadata for port SAPNWB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Convert Segment-Definitions to Types</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Make Syntax check of actual Idoc</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Set Receiver Routing-object</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Exit Function IDX_INBOUND_XMB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is expected by application !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:12Z UTC+8</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = DBD16497D8475CF186920017314ECFFB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0007</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0007</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start sender interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface FLIGHTBOOKING_SENDRESPONSE.FLIGHTBOOKING_SENDRESPONSE01*</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">no interface found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:12Z UTC+8</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO6___0001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:12Z UTC+8</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Interface Mapping http://sap.com/xi/XI/Demo/Agency FBOConfirmation_AirlineIDoc2Agency</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_OUTBOUND_BINDING">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV" />
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_CALL_ADAPTER">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_IE_ADAPTER-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_XMB-CALL_XMS_HTTP" />
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async processing completed OK.</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:13Z UTC+8</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
</SAP:Trace>

How to capture SOAPFault in an Async/Sync Scenario without BPM

Hello friends,
My scenario is ECC (async) to SOAP (sync) and back to ECC (async = ALEAUD). I'm using aync/sync bridge is receiver SOAP adapter.
My scenario works fine with a normal response but when I get a SOAPFault as a response I get the following error in de receiver SOAP adapter:
Message processing failed. Cause:
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.ConfigException: No sender agreement configured that matches the message's header fields (sender party: "", sender service: "NONSAP", interface: "urn:test, SII_Test_Sync", receiver party: "", receiver service: "BS_ECC")
The configuration of my receiver SOAP adapter looks like this:
Did I use parameters interfaceOnFault and interfaceNamespaceOnFault correctly?
Your help is greatly appreciated,
Kind regards,
John

Hi Nilesh,
sorry for the delay. What I found every time i used the option "DO NOT use SOAP envelope is checked" is that the envelope is removed from request and response/fault messages as well. To solve those kind of errors I developed a module called ReplaceString. What this module does is to replace a string with another one passed as parameter. What do I archive with this? Well I sometimes use this module to include some parts in the xml message before it gets in PI. For example, lets say you receive something like this:
<FaultMessage>
<standard>
 <faultText>
 <faultUrl>
 <faultDetail>
 <severity>High</severity>
 <text>This is an error</text>
 <url></url>
 <id></id>
 </faultDetail>
</standard>
</FaultMessage>
and you are expecting something like this:
<soap:Envelope
xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope"
soap:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding">
<FaultMessage>
<standard>
 <faultText>
 <faultUrl>
 <faultDetail>
 <severity>High</severity>
 <text>This is an error</text>
 <url></url>
 <id></id>
 </faultDetail>
</standard>
</FaultMessage>
</soap:Envelope>
You could use this module to replace the following strings:
<FaultMessage>
by
<soap:Envelope
xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope"
soap:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding"><FaultMessage>
And
</FaultMessage>
by
</FaultMessage></soap:Envelope>
If you find it useful, I can paste the code of the module here.
Regards!

Rfc to rfc without bpm scenario

Hi,
I am trying to do RFC to RFC scenario without BPM.but in sender communication channel following error is coming.
Sender channel 'CC_RFC2RFC_SENDER' for party '', service 'BS_RFC2RFC11' (internal name 'RfcServer[CC_RFC2RFC_SENDER]')
Server data: {jco.server.gwhost=192.168.2.12, jco.server.progid=program_rfc2rf, jco.server.gwserv=sapgw00, jco.server.unicode=0}
Repository data: {jco.client.lang=en, jco.client.snc_mode=0, jco.client.client=000, jco.client.passwd=******, jco.webas.ignore_jdsr_error=1, jco.client.user=bcuser, jco.client.sysnr=00, jco.client.ashost=192.168.2.12}
Current pool size: 1, maximum pool size : 1
Can anyone please tell me the cause of this error.??
Thanks
Rabi

Hi Priyanka,
I did as you had told but it is again showing same problem.
Will you please help me to resolve it?
Thanks
Rabi

IDoc - Web service - File without BPM

Hi all,
I have asked some days ago how to do an asynch -> synch -> asynch scenario in XI without using BPM.
The solution with RequestResponseBean and ResponseOnewayBean modules in the File sender communication channel works fine.
But now I would ask you how can I do if my sender is R/3, with IDocs?
Because we cannot use modules in the IDoc sender communication channel, and I don't want to use BPM.
Someone has an idea?
Thanks in advance,
Gregory

Hi,
May be you can try a work around.
1. IDOC > XI-> SOAP Asynch Scenario(Scenario 2 exposed as Webservice from XI).
2. SOAP>XI->External Webservice>File
In second case you can use Modules.
I have not tried.Check if the solution would suit your needs.
Regards,
Sudharshan N A
Edited by: Sudharshan Aravamudan on Feb 1, 2008 5:31 PM

Want Scenarios for BPM

Hi All,
Can anybody pl. provide some BPM Scenarios, BPM Docs, or any related Docs for BPM.
i want some Scenarios for BPM.
Thanks in advance,
Shweta

Hi Shwetha,
BPM is used for Stateful communications,suppose u have to delay message processing,or wait for other messages to arrive and then semd them all together,in that case use BPM.
We will use BPM when ever we want to do the following:
1.Controling or Monitoring of messages in XI
2. Collect or Merge the messages in XI
3. Split the messages in XI
4. Multicast a Message
5. Need to send an Alert
6. Transformation
With its BPM capability, SAP NetWeaver:
Exploits business-process efficiency by giving your business
users the ability to directly model, manage, monitor, and
analyze business processes
Enables continuous process improvement and the dynamic
modification of business processes
Extends the value of your companys core business investment
and maximizes the return on its strategic assets by providing
the ability to change process rules without additional IT
investment
Provides greater visibility into critical business operations for
better decision making by delivering the right information at
the right time
Allows the integration of people, applications, and internal
and external resources
Process step types:
Message relevant:
Receive: We use it to receive a message. By receiving a message we are sending the data into process. We can use it to start a process. We can use it for activating or using correlations.
Send: We use it to send either an asynchronous or synchronous message or an acknowledgement.
Receiver Determination: We use it to get a list of receivers for sub sequent send step. It calls the receiver determination that we configured in the integration directory and returns receivers list.
Transformation: We use it to change a message inside the process. E.g. bundling multiple messages into 1 or splits a message into multiple.
Using this we can create N:1 or 1:N or 1:1 transformations. In general scenario 1:N transformation is possible.
Process flow control Relevant:
Container: We use it to set a value for target container element at runtime. Target container element and assigned value must have same value.
Control: We use it to terminate the current process and to trigger an exception and to trigger an alert.
While Loop: To repeat the execution of steps within the loop.
Fork: We use it when you want to continue a process in branches that are independent of each other. E.g. to communicate with two systems that are independent to each other
Block: We use it to combine steps that you want to execute one after the other and which are to access the local data.
Empty: It has no influence on the process flow. We use it as a place holder for a step that has not yet been defined, and as a step with no functions for test purposes.
Wait: We use it to incorporate a delay in the process.
Switch: We use it to define different processing branches for a process
T.Codes for B.P.M:
SXMB_MONI_BPE
SXWF_XI_SW11
For Example a Small Explanation reg BPM for this Req we used BPM
A background program should be scheduled to run every 10 minutes to analyse any material records that have been created or changed or deleted that have occurred to the material master records in the last minute.
There are two Message Mappings involved in the whole scenario. First mapping is N:1 Mapping which will be used in BPM and second Mapping is 1:1 Mapping:
1. First Message Mapping  N: 1 u2013 Mapping between IDoc (occurrence u2013 0...unbounded in u201CMessagesu201D tab) to IDoc with changed occurrence of its top node (IDOC) as 0...unbounded. This message mapping will be used in BPM u2013 transformation step.
Description: This BPM collects all Idocs for 10 minutes which are of Message Type (ZMATMAS05) according to Receiver Partner Number (Field u2013 RCVPRN) and calls N: 1 mapping to bundle the collected Idocs in a One External Definition for that IDOC.
Use
You use a wait step ( ) to incorporate a delay in a process. Usually, you use a delay to define when the next step in the process is to start. You can define a delay as either a point in time or a period of time.
At runtime, the step waits until the specified point in time is reached or the specified period of time has passed. The system then continues the process by proceeding with the next step.
Expalined clearly how to do a file to file scenario with BPM :
/people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm
it is File>RFC>File using BPM then refer this blog.
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
BPM-1 /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm
BPM-2 /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2006/04/08/reconciliation-of-messages-in-bpm
BPM-3 /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
BPM-4 /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/11/xi-how-to-retrieve-messageid-from-a-bpm
Integratio Scenario
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2006/02/17/companion-guide-to-integration-scenario
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/08/27/modeling-integration-scenario146s-in-xi
Schedule BPM
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/22/schedule-your-bpm
Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
/people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi
Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
without BPM
/people/henrique.pinto/blog/2007/08/02/syncasync-scenarios-without-bpm
without BPM1
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2007/01/18/syncasync-communication-in-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp19
IDOC BPM
/people/pooja.pandey/blog/2005/07/27/idocs-multiple-types-collection-in-bpm
To deal with Multiple sender and receivers based on the conditions we could use BPM. Its one of the feature of BPM, but its not mandatory to go for BPM for each n every case. Its depends upon scnenario.
/people/marilyn.pratt/blog/2007/10/12/clubhouse-las-vegas-a-bpm-roadmap
BPM Process Patterns:Repeatable Design for BPM Process Models
http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/05%2D06%2DWP%2DBPMProcessPatterns%2DAtwood1%2Epdf
BPM Steps link : http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
Regards,
Vinod.

Synch-asynch scenario without bpm's?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for