Synch RFC--BPM --Sync JDBC

Hi All,
I am doing a schenario where in im using BPM.
Synch RFC from XI box will trigger the interface, then i will make a synch call to sql server & synch call(RFC) to R/3.
Can anyone please letme know the steps required in BPM.
Do i need synch-async bridge?
And also lemme know if i can map a ASyncronous Message Interface to a Syncronous Message Interface.
Can i Map source as Synch RFC & target as synch sql & synch rfc R/3.If not how do i map
Thanks
Sumit
Message was edited by: Sumit Khetawat

Sumit,
I just looked upo into one of my SYNCH AYNCH Scenarios and i have created my interfaces exactly like i mentioned in these steps,
<i>1. RECEIVE step ==> Opens SYNCH ASYNCH bridge and receives RFC request message.
( This will have a synchronous message interface associated with it. A synch abs interface and will be used for the PROPERTY ~~Synchrnous Message in the BPM) We would also need an ABS ASYNCH Message Interface created for the Request Message and this should be used in the MESSAGE ( after creating CONTAINER element) for the same. )
2. Transfrom step ==> Map RFC request message to JDBC request message. Mappinng between 2 abs Aynch Interfaces
( You will have container elements created for REq RFC as stated in the step 1 and another for JDBC request )
3. SEND synchronous ==> to send JDBC request and get the JDBC response.
( You will use a SYNCH ABS against MESSGAE INTERFACE , and also, a separate ABS ASYCNH for request and response )
4. TRANSFORM step==> Map JDBC response to RFC response . Mapping between ABS Interfaces
( same as step 2)
5. SEND ==> Closes SYNCH ASYNCH bridge and Send's response back to the RFC.</i>
Use the Container element created for the mapping in step 4.
In case of Split mapping, again you will need ABS ASYNCH Message interfaces.
Drop me a mail if you need screen shots.
Regards,
bhavesh
All you mapping in the BPM is between Asynch Abs Interfaces.

Similar Messages

BPM sync to jdbc produces No receiver could be determined

Hi,
I am sending a sync select statement from BPM to JDBC adapter but I get the following error: No receiver could be determined.
I checked in MONI and I can see the select statement, even the response but I get this error. I looked at the graphical workflow log and every step "executes successfuly" but in the XML messages list I have 3 messages, 2 with the successful flag and one with a red flag, the red flag displays this error.
Since both interfaces, the BPM abtract interface and the inbound interface for the JDBC adapter are BOTH SYNC, shouldn the response message arrive back at the BPM automatically ? or must I define another reciever determination ?
Cheers.

Hi,
How have you used the send step? In this case it should be used with sync mode.
Selcet the mode property of "send" step as synchronous. Then you will have to give two message types one for request and the other for response.
After this send step you can have a normal send step and you can use this to send response wherever you need.
Regards,
P.Venkat

In BPM sync/async Step , can you have different message schema?

Scenario:
File to XI to BPM to SOAP to RFC
In order to trigger the webservice , I use a dummy file which will be polled at a certain frequency- once in 30 minutes in Test mode - this will call the Webservice. The answer of webservice is sent to RFC Async.
so these are the Repository objects I created :
1. File Outbound Async Message Interface- Output Message (File_Request_MT)
2.File Abstract Message Interface-Output Message (File_Request_MT)
3.Async/ sync bridge Abstract interface to call the Webservice
4 Webservice Inbound Sync Message interface- with both input and output message
5.RFC Inbound Async message interface- input message (RFC_Request)
6 RFC Abstract Async Message interface-input message (RFC_Request)
BPM
a) Receive step which uses the the object 2.
b) Sync send which uses object 3
c) Send step which uses Object 5
I am using a BPM to Receive the file data/ "request " by using the File abstract message interface
Then use the the object 3 to call the webservice in BPM .
My question is on this step
Can I have for the abstract Interface(Object 3) the Request message as File_Request_MT and
response message as (RFC_Request) ?
I use a message mapping to map Input and Ouput message of Object 3 with Object 4.
Thanks for your insight

Raj,
Thanks for the feedback , but I have a question regarding your reply
Interface Objects
Object 1: File_Request_Abs
Object 2: Soap_Response_Abs
Object 3:Soap_Abs_Synch
Output Message:File_Request_Abs
Input Message:Soap_Response_Abs
Object 4:Rfc_Request_Abs
The question is about
a)SOAP_RESPONSE_ABS : could you please tell me why do we need an abstract interface -SOAP_RESPONSE_ABS?
I created a message type MT_SOAP_RESPONSE and used that in the BPM sync Send step as the Input message.
b)Soap_Abs_Synch- I am using message types
MT_File_request and MT_SOAP_Response From your reponse, it looks like you are suggesting to use
Abstract Interfaces as Output message and Input Message, am I correct? Could you please tell me whether this has advantages over using message types MT_file_request and MT_soap_reponse? I haven't used Abstract interfaces before as Input message and output message; infact, I wasn't even aware that it can be. Please confirm that it is possible. Thank you for increasing my knowledge !!!
These are the Objects I created
Message Type :
a) MT_Filerequest
b) MT_SOAPresponse
Message Interface
a)MI_Filerequest_out_async -
Output message
Mess. type MT_filerequst
b)MI_filerequest_async_abs-
Mess. type MT_filerequst
Used
i) used for BPM receiver step- container definition
ii) receiver determination
c)MI_webservice_sync_in - This is created from External definition
d)MI_webservice_sync_abs-
Input message - MT_soapresponse
Output message- MT_fierequest
Used:
i) used for BPM sync send step ,
ii)Interface mapping between MI_Webservice_sync_in and MI_webservice_sync_abs
iii)Container element-SOAP_response
e) MI_RFC_async_out
Input message
RFC_Request(This is imported from RFC definition)
g) MI_RFC_async_abs
Input message
RFC_Request(This is imported from RFC definition)
Mapping
Message mapping
i)Filerequest_TO_SOAPrequest
Source: MT_Filerequest
Target: SOAPrequest(Got from External definition)
ii)SOAPresponse_TO_BPM_response
Source : SOAPresponse(got from External definition)
Target : MT_SOAPresponse
Interface Mapping
i)IM_BPM_TO_SOAP
Source Interface : MI_webservice_sync_abs
Target :MI_webservice_sync_in
uses following message mapping
Request : filerequest_TO_SOAPrequest
Response:SOAPresponse_TO_BPM_response
BPM container element
i)Receiver_container TYPE MI_Filerequest_out_async
ii)SOAP Responsecontainer TYPE MI_webservice_sync_abs
iii)RFC_Request_container TYPE MI_RFC_async_abs
BPM flow
Receive---->Send Synch-->Transformation----->Send Asynch
Receive -
> receiver_container
Send Synch -
> receiver_container(Request Message), Soap_response_container(Response Message)
Transformation -
> Source(Soap_response_container), Target(RFC_request_container)
Send Asynch -
> RFC_request_container
Thanks for your help!!!

Error with Asynchronous RFC call to JDBC

Hi all,
We are working on a scenarion where in we have to make an asynchronous RFC call to JDBC.
We have configured RFC sender adapter following this weblog
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/configuring-the-sender-rfc-adapter--step-by-step
We have created data types only for the database as RFC does not require any data types.
And also we have created message types,message interfaces accordingly.
In Message Mappping,we mapped the export parameters of RFC to the access fields of database message type.
Also we have created sender agreement,interface determinations etc.... accordingly
And for sending RFC request asynchronously we followed this weblog
/people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2006/12/28/send-rfc-to-sap-xi-150-asynchronous
Once done with all the above steps we could able to trigger the RFC call and caught with the following errors in SXMB_MONI and no errors are seen in communication monitoring
SOAP Error:
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>+
+- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">EXCEPTION_DURING_EXECUTE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>com/sap/xi/tf/_curr_exg_mm2_</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" /> <SAP:Stack>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException thrown during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_curr_exg_mm2_: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Also trace shows the following error thogh the interface determinations are properly configured
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start sender interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface BAPI_EXCHRATE_GETCURRENTRATES*</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">no interface found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start receiver interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Loop 0000000001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">no interface found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--no sender or receiver interface definition found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hence set action to DEL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
the above errors are shown as part of request mapping..
Can any one please let me know what other configurations do we need to do?
I did not map the RFC import parameters,do we need to do that
Any help in this regard is really appreciated
Rgds,
Santhosh

Hi,
I am really happy to hear that the problem with mapping is resolved.
Now as per your requirment It needs to be aynschornous RFC--> XI ---> JDBC call. In XI you should map the RFC Export parameters to the traget structure of JDBC.
then the question is to how to trigger the RFC Function Module in R/3 to XI.
Plesae follow below steps to trigger it from SAP R/3
1. Create a RFC in the R/3 system
2. Configure the SM59 and Sender Communication channle as given in the Michal's blog. Also test if it is succesful.
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/configuring-the-sender-rfc-adapter--step-by-step
3. Import the RFC in XI
4. Do the mapping to the target strucutre
5. Configure the JDBC receiver adapter
/people/sameer.shadab/blog/2005/10/24/connecting-to-ms-access-using-receiver-jdbc-adapter-without-dsn
6. You can trigger the RFC from R/3 sytem by using
Async Call - in ABAP program use below syntax to call RFC. Here the export parameters will be passed on to XI which further have mapped to JDBC.
CALL Function "RFC Name" IN BACKGROUND TASK destination <sm59 destination>
COMMIT WORK.
Sync Call
CALL Function "RFC Name" destination <sm59 destination>
Thanks
Swarup
Edited by: Swarup Sawant on Jan 27, 2008 9:14 AM

JDBC(Sender)-XI-RFC (Request) RFC (Response)-XI-JDBC(Receiver)

Hi All,
JDBC(Sender)-XI-RFC (Request)
RFC (Response)-XI-JDBC(Receiver).
Need some solution for sending email for successfully completion of scenario after updating SQL DB Table.
Let me explain the scenario:
We are pooling the SQL DB table to pull the records and map the records to RFC request parameters, after successful Posting the entries in R3 HR, RFC response contain the same with E (Error) S (Success) records status, we are updating the same in SQL DB table, I implemented the complete scenario without BPM with the help of module processor in Sending JDBC Adapter, scenario is working fine but now we have to send the successful mail to our support team with status contain Number of success, Error and total records as email.
I need the solution how to implement the same requirement in current scenario.
Is their way to do something with the RFC receiver adapter module addition to send the successful mail or generating Alert with all the description?
I am at PI 7.0 SP12 with HP unix box.
Thanks in Advance for creative idea
With Regards
Sunil

Hi Bhavesh,
Thanks for your help and your blog is really helpful. I implemented the UDF for generating Email Alert but this alert is generating before Updating the SQL Database, is their any way to generate alert after updating the SQL.
Actually in my scenario we are sending the data from SQL to R3 by RFC and again updating the SQL status whatever the RFC return, after successfully updating SQL we need to send success email to support people but if we are sending the email before updating the DB then their will be problem.
JDBC receiver after updating the SQL DB returns the response with No. of row updated but how to capture this response, if we can capture this response then we can send email through email adapter even their is one more problem, In my scenario I am counting the number of rows with status S and E and sending the same in alert email but if are sending email after updating the SQL DB where can hold the row count value and use it while sending the email.
Implemented the scenario without using BPM..i am using sender JDBC module processor for Syn-Asyn bridge.
Even I do not find the link to reward point. Please let me know how to do it.
With Regards
Sunil

Error processing in non BPM sync process

I've created a sync non BPM process which is working fine. Data comes from several terminals via HTTP. My scenario is HTTP=>XI=>RFC
On the sending side, I use ABAP mapping or parser. I'm using this since I have to check some table data based on plant code and react accordingly.
However, its quite possible that this table does not contain data for a given plant code or invalid plant code in which case I need to send back an response instead of calling RFC like I would normally do.
Any idea how I can send back a message without going through RFC (receiver determination)....remember I have manipuated the RFC message in the ABAP mapping (in interface determination) and the only data I have available in receiver determination is original message which is not good.
This has gotten very tricky now. I cannot use BPM due to WF response time + added RFC time (6 secs). Using non BPM I'm down to 1 sec or so which the users are happy.
Thanks,
Very confused XI programer.

Michal, The table is in XI. Table has few different fields that are important to the interface esp. The R3 system to call. Based on the plant code, we decide which SAP system to send data to. And in XI, we store this info...ex: PIP3 plant goes to AI0 system. The terminals where is information is generated does not have this sophistication.
How would you accomplish this HTTP=>XI=>RFC non BPM sync process. BPM adds too much time and the users don't wait that long in today process which will be replaced by XI. Non BPM yields 1 sec which is what they want. Thousands of messages flow and they cannot wait that long.
Do you have suggestions.

Asynch-Synch without BPM

Hello,
We have an asynch to synch (File to RFC) which was successfully done using the blog (aysnch-synch without BPM). The interface works fine except when there are failures. Whenever there is a mapping failure, the module bean waits and does not process it which is a perfect synchronous behavior. However is there a way to make use of the asynchronous property of the sender file adapter (which is to read the incoming files, archive them and may be queue them after the archive step incase of failures). I tried the callsapadapter before the module bean call but it doesnu2019t seem to do the trick. Any advise is very helpful.
Teresa

Hi,
It seems your scenario is working fine as per the blog.
For archiving files in sender file adapter you have an option..in processing mode you can select Archive so that files that have been successfully processed are moved to an archive directory.
Under Archive Directory, enter the name of the archive directory.
If you want to archive the files on the FTP server, set the Archive Files on FTP Server indicator. If you do not set the indicator, the files are archived in the Adapter Engine file system.
Thanks
Hamja

HTTP-RFC(BPM)-FILE Scenario

I have a problem on using the 'http-RFC(BPM)-File scenario'. When i enter values using the Client http adapter, it displays message telling that "BPE_ADDAPTER.SYNCHONOUS_MESSAGE"
The error msg is displayed below:
Result:
<SAP:Error>
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code>BPE_ADAPTER.SYNCHONOUS_MESSAGE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:Stack>The process does not support the given synchronous interface or does not support synchronous messages</SAP:Stack>
</SAP:Error>
Also in SAP XI monitor, the sender services along with the corresponding sender interfaces.
Expecting this prob will be off soon.
thanks
vinod v

Hi Vinod,
your process is asynchronous (no sync async bridge). But you send "Quality of Service = Best Effort" (Url paramater qos=BE). You should send "Exactly Once" (EO).
Regards,
Udo

RFC Sender and RFC Receiver Sync Scenario . Help required.

Hi,
I need to make RFC Sender and RFC Receiver Sync Scenario.
Any docs/links for it.
Regards

Hi,
I have CRM (r/3) and DM (r/3)system.
Data from differnent tables of CRM system needs to go to
DM system different tables , data will be saved there and then return response back to CRM system.
For this I have given one RFC for CRM system
For this I have given one RFC for DM system
So I have to make Sync Outbound Interface
and Sync Inbound Interface.
So I think so no BPM is required.I am correct?
Adapter -- RFC Sender and RFC Receiver Adapter.
Regards
Edited by: Henry H on Jan 29, 2008 11:20 AM

HT1349 Why do i keep getting the following message when trying to sync my ipod to my itunes? The ipod could not be synched because the sync session failed to start....

Everytime I try to sync my iPod Touch with updated music from my iTunes library, I get the following error message: The iPod could not be synched because the sync session failed to start.
Please help!

Hello easbda,
Thank you for providing the details of the calendar issue you are experiencing with your iPhone. I recommend following the steps in the section titled "Troubleshooting on Microsoft Windows (Microsoft Outlook)" in the following article to assist with syncing your calendar events between your devices:
iCloud: Troubleshooting iCloud Calendar
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3999
Thank you for using Apple Support Communities.
Best,
Sheila M.

RFC Send (Sync) --- XI -- RFC Rec (Sync) scenario. Pls help

Hello All,
There is one scenario
RFC Send (Sync) --- XI -- RFC Rec (Sync)
Now I want to make it to async as I do not need response
RFC Send (Async) --- XI -- RFC Rec (Async)
1. I know about Abap Client and Server Proxy that can be
    async but the RFC's are very complex in nature. I am not
    and abaper also
    Can there be a way that Sender and Receiver RFC can be
    made Async. Or any other simple way.
Regards

Hi Swarup,
I have done the same thing.
I have removed the export parameters of both the RFCs
In interface mapping I used the request message mapping. and kept the response mapping part blank.
Now when I run this scenario it works fine but also
in sxmb_moni I see two messages.
One for my request mapping. -- ok .
Second empty message for response mapping.
I do not want this second message in my sxmb_moni.
Pls advice
Regards

BPM FILE-- JDBC-- RFC

Hi All,
I am doing the File to JDBC(Sync) to RFC through BPM
Start->Receive(Ansc)>Send(sync)>send(Anyc)>
I have created like this:
DT and corresponding MT
1. File
2.JDBC_Req
3.JDBC_Req_response
i have created Message interfaces bellow
File outbound
File outbound Abstract
JDBC sync inound
JDBC Sync Abstract
JDBC response Asyc Abstract
I have created Mappings like this
File to File outbound Abstract
File Abstact JDBC_req
JDBC_Req Abstact to JDBC_Req
JDBC_res Abstact to JDBC_res
JDBC_res Abstact to RFC
I have created Interface Mappings like this
File to File Abstract
JDBC_req to JDBC_res
JDBC_res to RFC
while i am doing in BPM i am getting error like this:
Message File Abstact to be received and synchrounous interface MI_JDBC_req_Abstact are not of the same type
Pls suggest me how i can map the File Abstact and JDBC Abstact.
Thanks,
Venkat

Hi,
According to my understanding your scenario is:
1) Pick a file from some file server
2) Send it to a BPM
3) Send this file as a request to JDBC and get back the response....i.e synchronous..
4) Once you get the response from JDBC map it to a RFC structure and send it to the specified destination.
If the above flow is correctly understood by me then the following design won't work....
Start--Receive--Receive--Tranformation--Send(Sync)--Send--End
Your design should be:
Start --> Receive (async) --> Transformation --> Send (Sync) --> Send (Async) --> End
1)
a) Define an Outbound-Async MI for File Sender
b) Define an Abstract-Asynch MI for BPM ....(include in first receive step of BPM)
MT for (a) and (b) shoulde be same...
2) Define an Abstract-Async MI....this should have the request structure for the JDB
3) Create a mapping between MI from step 1a and 2...(include in the Transformation step of BPM)
4) Create an Abstract-Sync MI for BPM_to_JDBC....include the same message-type as that in step2....in the input message (request) part of the sync MI.....(include in the Sync-Send Step of BPM)
5) Create Inbound-Sync MI for the JDBC receiver...again both the message type should be same as that in the Abstract-Sync MI of step4
6) Create Abstract-Async MI for the RFC receiver....(include in the last Send step of the BPM)
I hope that you are defining the MIs with proper message-types and with proper direction...same applicable for container variable definition...please note that all the MIs involved in the BPM should be abstract
The error that you are getting is bcoz of the mismatch in the message-type in the MI....please check it.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Sync JDBC call from ParForEach block in BPM (XI 3.0)

Has anyone tried the following scenario:
My BPM flow starts with a single message that I split using a message map into a list of messages to be sent synchronously to an Oracle stored procedure via the JDBC adapter. After the mapping step, the flow goes into a ParForEach block that executes the sync Send step to the JDBC adapter, and then has a Container Action that collects the responses.
My problem is that BPM seems to not like executing a synchronous send from inside a block. The first execution of the send step will produce an error in the BPM flow. The adapter framework, however, shows that the JDBC call executed normally and that the response message was sent back to the integration server. There is no error indicated in SXMB_MONI, which inidicates to me that the response message was delivered successfully business server (the BPM flow).
If anyone could shed any light or share any experience, it would be greatly appreciated.
Chris

Hi Chris,
I am facing same situation how you configured BLOCK step for Sync response.Please let me know the flow how you configured.
Srinivas.

"No Receiver Determined" in BPM Sync RFC Call

My scenario is xml file -> XI BPM -> RFC1 -> RFC2 (will call RFC2 if RFC1 is successful).
I am still just trying to get the RFC1 call working properly. I have been using blogs 1822, 1403 and 1926. I have also used some related BPM threads. It seems to be making the RFC call properly, but failing on the response.
<SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_BE
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
These docs show my IB Repository and Directory setups. Can anyone look at them and tell me what is missing? Thanks in advance!
http://webpages.charter.net/kpwendel2/bsmDir.jpg
http://webpages.charter.net/kpwendel2/bsmRep.jpg

Keith,
the problem is quite clear.
In your BPM, you have a synchronous interface in your sync send step.
However, in configuration, you have configured two asynchronous interfaces.
To be able to use sync send step in BPM, your RFC needs to be able to send a response back. Then you need to have two message mappings (one for bpm->rfc messages, and other for rfc_response -> bpm_response messages) and a interface mapping between the 2 sync interfaces (bpm_sync_int -> rfc_sync_int) using these 2 message mappings.
Also, some hints:
1. Don't do these mappings in BPM transformation step. You can execute them outside of BPM. Doing this, you will get better performance and also won't need to create abstract interfaces for RFC messages.
2. Use configuration wizard in Integration Directory (first, remove and reimport your BPM in Integration Directory). This way, you avoid different interfaces errors.
Regards,
Henrique.

File-RFC-File Sync-- BPM error..

Hi All,
My scenario is File -- RFC -- File, synchronous scenario, The scenario needs to be designed using BPM its clients requirement, and i have used Receive step, BLOCK and in the block Transform, Sync Send, Transform and with in the block i have used control step with cancel process.. and out of block send step .. when i execute the scenario, in sxmb_moni i can able to see the response message and when i see in SXMB_MONI_BPE the flow was blocked in the BLOCK1 Step and i am not getting the response file in my target ftp directory.. so request you to post any links how to debug this issue..
regards,
sai

BLOCK and in the block Transform, Sync Send, Transform and with in the block i have used control step with cancel
process.
when i execute the scenario, in sxmb_moni i can able to see the response message and when i see in SXMB_MONI_BPE the flow
was blocked in the BLOCK1 Step and i am not getting the response file in my target ftp directory.
The BPM is working perfectly as designed....you have a maintained a Cancel Process step....how in such a case will the BPM proceed? The BPM is bound to stop in side the block itself the BLOCK1.
What is the reason of having a Block over Transform --> SYNC Send --> Transform?
Your BPM should be:
Receive --> Transform --> Sync_Send --> transform --> Send.
If you want to have a block then have it for the individual steps with an Exception Branch and then in this Exception Branch have a Conntrol Step cancelling the process.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Synch RFC--BPM --Sync JDBC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for