Synchronization problem MoH in CTI port

Hi
I have a problem with the synchronization of  User Hold Audio Source and Network Hold Audio Source in the CTI Ports. The callmanager cluster is 6.0.1.2121-1 and UCCX 5 versio.
After doing a Data Resync the result is User Hold Audio Source-- UUID changed from {AC0250B0-6F23-4D91-A73B-A733B011C5CE} to {31E8EA9C-57832-43F7-8384-4C6351A97110}.
Attached is a picture about the result of Data Resync process.
Thanks in advance.
Regards.

MOH issues can be tricky, but let's start with a couple of assumptions:
1.  You are running a single CCM cluster
2.  The callers coming into the UCCX system are all using the same MRGL
3.  If you're using Multicast for MOH, then you have multicast properly set up. 
4.  You have the MOH audio source files loaded on all the servers where it needs to be (must be loaded on each MOH server individually, these do NOT replicate).
I make the above statements because if any of the above are not true, you can have issues, and while they may manifest on UCCX, they are not UCCX problems.
If you have the data resync/check coming up clean, and it's still misbehaving, open up the call control groups and make some small modification to them...change the description or something so that it will delete all the ports and then rebuild them.  Make sure you open up the more info and confirm the settings are where you want them to be.  The existing ports will get deleted and then rebuilt.  This will resolve any issue where someone modified something directly on CCM that could potentially cause your issue. 

Similar Messages

  • Problems to registering CTI ports

    Hi to all,
    I'm trying to do a upgrade from CUE 2.3 to CUE 8.6. The installation was ok, but the CTI ports and route point isn't registering in the CUCM server, this server is a 8.5 version.
    Before we had a CCM 4.2 and CUE 2.3 with the same configuration and the all was working fine, but when we did the upgrade all is working but the CTI port isn't registering. The GW and the CUCM are in two diferents subnet and have open access for all ports....
    Any idea??
    Thanks..
    P.D.: Sorry but my english is very bad,

    Hi David,
    You english is perfect my friend so, no worries
    When you move past CUCM 5.x the integration with CUE changes as well, did you
    follow the steps in this good doc?
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5520/products_configuration_example09186a0080289ef0.shtml#cm5andlater
    Cheers!
    Rob
    "Show a little faith, there's magic in the night" - Springsteen

  • Multiple MoH files IPCC CTI Ports

    Is there a way to specify which MoH file to play within the IPCC script?
    I need to be able to Accept the call and while searching for an Agent play a ringback wave file. After a predetermined amount of time play a recorded message which can just be a step in the scipt, but I then need to play a different MoH file with actual music.
    I know that I can change the MoH for all CTI ports associated with IPCC but have not figure out a way to change the MoH file that is supposed to be played depending on what point in the script the call is at. Thank you in advance.
    Ryan

    I may not be following you here, but I will try. 
    If I follow, you are looking to do the following:
    1. Accept call
    2. Play ringback (using moh)
    3. Do some workflow
    4. Play message (using play prompt)
    5. Play music on hold using the CUCM MoH server and audio source file
    If this is indeed your script flow, then you may consider the following:
    1. Accept call
    2. Start ring back loop:
    :RingbackLoop
    play prompt "ringback"
    do some workflow  (item 3 from above)
    if goto NextStep
    Delay sec
    goto RingbackLoop
    :NextStep
    play prompt "message"
    queue caller
    Call Hold  (this will engage CUCM MoH)
    etc.
    HTH.
    Regards,
    Bill
    Please remember to rate helpful posts.

  • SIP trunk call to CTI port media endpoint problem

    Hi, I have the following scenario:
    CUCM ---SIP-----CUBE----SIP----ITSP
    CUCM cluster has two servers 10.1.9.5 and 10.1.9.6 (subscriber), we have a CTI application running on 10.1.9.8, we got a bunch of SIP DIDs from ITSP and those SIP DID numbers are mapped to CUCM internal DNs on CUBE through translation, inbound SIP calls to mapped SCCP phones work fine, media stream of internal call leg is established directly between SCCP phone and CUBE as expected. However, when inbound SIP calls to the number which maps to CTI extention, there is no audio, debug on CUBE shows that the media stream of internal call leg is between one of the CUCM servers. I want to understand why CUCM is telling CUBE to use the IP address which is NOT CTI port is registered from (in this case 10.1.9.8)? why would CUCM treat a CTI extention differently from a regular SCCP phone extension. For regular inbound call to SCCP phones codec between CUCM-CUBE and between CUBE-ITSP are both g11ulaw.
    Thanks,

    "debug on CUBE shows that the media stream of internal call leg is  between one of the CUCM servers" ==>
    debug on CUBE shows that the media stream of internal call leg is  between 10.1.9.5 (happens to be MTP) and CUBE

  • UCCE 7.5.1 - CTI Route Point and CTI Ports not registering in UCM 7.1

    We are in a middle of a new installation of UCCE 7.5.1. The customer will use it only for Outbound calls. The design is to have on PROGGER and one AW, with a cluster of two CallManagers. All the setup has finished regarding the UCCE. Also, the CallManagers have been configured, regarding the CTI Route Point and the CTI Ports. All of these are associated with the PG USER which is CTI Enabled. Configuration on UCCE has been done, including the DIALER, except for the agents and the campaigns.
    The problem is that the CTI Route Point and the CTI Ports on CallManager are not registering. Is this normal, since the agents and the campaigns have not been configured yet or there is an error somewhere?

    Looks fine.
    Is the Dialer running? Maybe those 30VIP phones the Dialer uses as ports to dial from won't be registered until the Dialer starts.
    But they should also be registered if you start dialogictest over the full set.
    What's the "route point". Who asks for it? Is it a dialed number that runs a script?
    Regards,
    Geoff

  • Client Synchronization Problem

    Hi All,
    When I am synchronizing for the first time to get deviceid from mobile client
    getting the following error.
    • Synchronization started 
    • Proxy http://xyz:port/meSync/servlet/meSync?~sysid=ABC& 
    • Connection to server failed. 
    • Synchronization problems: Transport-layer (http) sync exception raised (root cause: Exception while synchronizing (java.io.IOException: Not in GZIP format)) 
    Could anybody tell what  I have to do please.
    Regards,
    Ameer Baba

    Hi Abhijit,
    Here it is.
    Trace   
    [20070219 08:57:53:791] I [MI/API/Logging ] ***** LOG / TRACE SWITCHED ON 
    [20070219 08:57:53:791] I [MI/API/Logging ] ***** Mobile Engine version: MI 70 SP 9 Patch 5 Build 200612061055 
    [20070219 08:57:53:791] I [MI/API/Logging ] ***** Current timezone: Indian/Reunion 
    [20070219 08:57:53:791] I [MI ] Trace severity: All (1000) 
    [20070219 08:57:53:791] D [MI/PIOS ] No implementations found. Error Code:(3) 
    [20070219 08:57:53:791] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:dispatch request to '/jsp/trace/trace.jsp' 
    [20070219 08:57:59:808] D [MI/Core ] Set current application to 'MOBILEENGINE_JSP' 
    [20070219 08:57:59:808] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:doGet(...) called 
    [20070219 08:57:59:808] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:getEvent() done with event name = '' 
    [20070219 08:57:59:808] I [MI/API/Sync ] Terminate connection feature is not configured 
    [20070219 08:57:59:808] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:dispatch request to '/jsp/home/home.jsp' 
    [20070219 08:58:01:569] D [MI/Core ] Set current application to 'MOBILEENGINE_JSP' 
    [20070219 08:58:01:569] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:doGet(...) called 
    [20070219 08:58:01:569] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:getEvent() done with event name = '' 
    [20070219 08:58:01:569] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:dispatch request to '/jsp/home/syncpassword.jsp' 
    [20070219 08:58:06:432] D [MI/Core ] Set current application to 'MOBILEENGINE_JSP' 
    [20070219 08:58:06:432] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:doGet(...) called 
    [20070219 08:58:06:432] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:getEvent() done with event name = '' 
    [20070219 08:58:06:432] P [MI/Sync ] Notify R3 called 
    [20070219 08:58:06:432] D [MI/Sync ] There is already a container for method WAF_REGISTRY and user AMEERB in the outbound queue 
    [20070219 08:58:06:432] I [MI/API/Sync ] Terminate connection feature is not configured 
    [20070219 08:58:06:432] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:dispatch request to '/jsp/home/home.jsp' 
    [20070219 08:58:06:447] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Create MEResourceBundle(com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine, en_IN, (null)) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:447] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Use classloader com.sap.ip.me.core.Startup@18fe7c3 
    [20070219 08:58:06:447] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED MEPropertyResourceBundle com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@d24e3f for bundleName: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine with Locale: _en 
    [20070219 08:58:06:463] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED parent MEPropertyResourceBundle for child bundle: com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@d24e3f using bundle name: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine 
    [20070219 08:58:06:463] I [MI/Sync ] Synchronize with backend called, Thread=Thread-27 
    [20070219 08:58:06:463] I [MI/Sync ] Thread=Thread-27 took lock for synchronization. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:463] P [MI/Sync ] Use following gateway for synchronization: http://cymobile:8001 
    [20070219 08:58:06:588] D [MI/SyncMonitor ] New synchronization process has been started 
    [20070219 08:58:06:588] D [MI/Sync ] Synchronisation: Fire SyncEvent 0 
    [20070219 08:58:06:588] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Create MEResourceBundle(com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine, en_IN, (null)) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:588] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Use classloader com.sap.ip.me.core.Startup@18fe7c3 
    [20070219 08:58:06:588] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED MEPropertyResourceBundle com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@10f41e9 for bundleName: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine with Locale: _en 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED parent MEPropertyResourceBundle for child bundle: com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@10f41e9 using bundle name: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncEvent[source=com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger@5bb966] skipped for User because he has not been installed on MW. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncEvent[source=com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger@5bb966] skipped for User because he has not been installed on MW. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncEvent[source=com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger@5bb966] skipped for User because he has not been installed on MW. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncEvent[source=com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger@5bb966] skipped for User because he has not been installed on MW. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncEvent[source=com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger@5bb966] skipped for User because he has not been installed on MW. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncEvent[source=com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger@5bb966] skipped for User because he has not been installed on MW. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncEvent[source=com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger@5bb966] skipped for User because he has not been installed on MW. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncEvent[source=com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger@5bb966] skipped for User because he has not been installed on MW. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncEvent[source=com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger@5bb966] skipped for User because he has not been installed on MW. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:603] P [MI/Sync ] Start updating data completeness flag for user all sync relevant users 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] P [MI/Sync ] Update data completeness flag for user AMEERB 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] P [MI/Sync ] Update data completeness flag for user (SHARED) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] P [MI/Sync ] Finished updating data completeness flag for user all sync relevant users 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] P [MI/Sync ] Repetitive sync is turned off 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] P [MI/Sync ] Synchronization started for user (SHARED) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Create MEResourceBundle(com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine, en_IN, (null)) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Use classloader com.sap.ip.me.core.Startup@18fe7c3 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED MEPropertyResourceBundle com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@b05acd for bundleName: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine with Locale: _en 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED parent MEPropertyResourceBundle for child bundle: com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@b05acd using bundle name: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] D [MI/SyncMonitor ] Sync monitor data file does not exist; use default values 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] D [MI/SyncMonitor ] Start sync cycle at 20070219085806 (1171875486634) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] D [MI/Sync ] PackageManager: old package file C:\Program Files\SAP Mobile Infrastructure\sync\(SHARED)\out\package.out was successfully deleted 
    [20070219 08:58:06:634] D [MI/Sync ] PackageManager: create package with maximum 2147483647 items 
    [20070219 08:58:06:650] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Create MEResourceBundle(com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine, en_IN, (null)) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:650] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Use classloader com.sap.ip.me.core.Startup@18fe7c3 
    [20070219 08:58:06:650] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED MEPropertyResourceBundle com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@1989b5 for bundleName: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine with Locale: _en 
    [20070219 08:58:06:650] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED parent MEPropertyResourceBundle for child bundle: com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@1989b5 using bundle name: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine 
    [20070219 08:58:06:650] D [MI/Sync ] PackageManager: filled package with 0 acknowledge received container(s) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:650] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Create MEResourceBundle(com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine, en_IN, (null)) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:650] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Use classloader com.sap.ip.me.core.Startup@18fe7c3 
    [20070219 08:58:06:650] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED MEPropertyResourceBundle com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@a00185 for bundleName: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine with Locale: _en 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED parent MEPropertyResourceBundle for child bundle: com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@a00185 using bundle name: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/Sync ] PackageManager: filled package with 0 acknowledge container(s) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Create MEResourceBundle(com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine, en_IN, (null)) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Use classloader com.sap.ip.me.core.Startup@18fe7c3 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED MEPropertyResourceBundle com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@c3c315 for bundleName: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine with Locale: _en 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED parent MEPropertyResourceBundle for child bundle: com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@c3c315 using bundle name: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/Sync ] PackageManager: filled package with 0 container items or headers 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/Sync ] PackageManager: filled package with 1 notify container(s) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/SyncMonitor ] Finished outbound preparation at 20070219085806 (1171875486666) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/Sync ] Package file C:\Program Files\SAP Mobile Infrastructure\sync\(SHARED)\out\package.out exists and can be read 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] P [MI/Sync ] Synchronisation started 
    [20070219 08:58:06:666] D [MI/Sync ] Begin: Dumping file C:\Program Files\SAP Mobile Infrastructure\sync\(SHARED)\out\package.out 
    <ID>MISYNC</ID><FLAGS>0x1</FLAGS><VERSION>251500</VERSION> 
    <CONTAINER> 
    <HEADER> 
    <CONTAINER_ID>0110d938dbcae8b4c559</CONTAINER_ID> 
    <OWNER></OWNER> 
    <CONTAINER_TYPE>N</CONTAINER_TYPE> 
    <METHOD></METHOD> 
    <CONVERSATION_ID></CONVERSATION_ID> 
    <PARENT_CONTAINER_ID></PARENT_CONTAINER_ID> 
    <MESSAGE_INDEX>-1</MESSAGE_INDEX> 
    <MESSAGE_TYPE> </MESSAGE_TYPE> 
    <SERVER_ID>NEW_PROTOCOL</SERVER_ID> 
    <BODY_TYPE></BODY_TYPE> 
    <BODY_LENGTH>0</BODY_LENGTH> 
    <SUB_CONTAINER_ID>-1</SUB_CONTAINER_ID> 
    <SUB_CONT_MAX>0</SUB_CONT_MAX> 
    <ITEM_FROM>-1</ITEM_FROM> 
    <ITEM_TO>-1</ITEM_TO> 
    </HEADER> 
    </CONTAINER> 
    <SYNC_MONITOR> 
    <NEW_SYNC_FLAG>1</NEW_SYNC_FLAG> 
    <OUTBOUND_PREPARATION_TIME>0</OUTBOUND_PREPARATION_TIME> 
    <OUTBOUND_PREPARATION_FINISHED>20070219085806</OUTBOUND_PREPARATION_FINISHED> 
    <LAST_SERVER2CLIENT_NETWORK_TIME>-2147483648</LAST_SERVER2CLIENT_NETWORK_TIME> 
    <LAST_INBOUND_PROCESSING_TIME>-2147483648</LAST_INBOUND_PROCESSING_TIME> 
    <LAST_SYNC_CYCLE_TIME>-2147483648</LAST_SYNC_CYCLE_TIME> 
    <LAST_SYNC_GUID></LAST_SYNC_GUID> 
    </SYNC_MONITOR> 
    [20070219 08:58:06:681] D [MI/Sync ] End: Dumping file C:\Program Files\SAP Mobile Infrastructure\sync\(SHARED)\out\package.out 
    [20070219 08:58:06:681] I [MI/Sync ] Outbound file size for user (SHARED) is 131 
    [20070219 08:58:06:681] P [MI/Sync ] Do not use http proxy (system properties update) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:681] P [MI/Sync ] Use following gateway for synchronization: http://cymobile:8001 
    [20070219 08:58:06:681] I [MI/Sync ] GzipDataCompression: Gzip data compression is switched on 
    [20070219 08:58:06:681] P [MI/Sync ] Sending outbound file compressed to server. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:681] P [MI/Sync ] Outbound file was compressedly sent. 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] I [MI/Sync ] HttpSynchronizer caught exception java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://name:port/sap/bc/MJC/mi_host?sysid=XYZ&client=100&~language=EN&ACKNOWLEDGE=& 
    java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://name:port/sap/bc/MJC/mi_host?sysid=XYZ&client=100&~language=EN&ACKNOWLEDGE=& 
    at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:812) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.HTTPSynchronizer.getInputStreamViaTimeOutOrNot(HTTPSynchronizer.java:351) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.HTTPSynchronizer.synchronize(HTTPSynchronizer.java:258) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.HTTPSynchronizer.synchronize(HTTPSynchronizer.java:484) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.HTTPSynchronizer.exchangeData(HTTPSynchronizer.java:73) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSyncCycle(SyncManagerImpl.java:847) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.syncForUser(SyncManagerImpl.java:1304) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSynchronization(SyncManagerImpl.java:935) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:440) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:303) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncManager.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManager.java:79) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.apps.jsp.Home$SyncRunnable.run(Home.java:568) 
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] E [MI/Sync ] Exception while synchronizing via http 
    com.sap.ip.me.api.services.HttpConnectionException: Exception while synchronizing (java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://name:port/sap/bc/MJC/mi_host?sysid=XYZ&client=100&~language=EN&ACKNOWLEDGE=&) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.HTTPSynchronizer.synchronize(HTTPSynchronizer.java:334) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.HTTPSynchronizer.synchronize(HTTPSynchronizer.java:484) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.HTTPSynchronizer.exchangeData(HTTPSynchronizer.java:73) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSyncCycle(SyncManagerImpl.java:847) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.syncForUser(SyncManagerImpl.java:1304) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSynchronization(SyncManagerImpl.java:935) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:440) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:303) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncManager.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManager.java:79) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.apps.jsp.Home$SyncRunnable.run(Home.java:568) 
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] P [MI/Core ] original context restored 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] W [MI/Sync ] Synchronisation problems 
    com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncException: Transport-layer (http) sync exception raised (root cause: Exception while synchronizing (java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://name:port/sap/bc/MJC/mi_host?sysid=XYZ&client=100&~language=EN&ACKNOWLEDGE=&)) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.HTTPSynchronizer.exchangeData(HTTPSynchronizer.java:82) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSyncCycle(SyncManagerImpl.java:847) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.syncForUser(SyncManagerImpl.java:1304) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSynchronization(SyncManagerImpl.java:935) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:440) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:303) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncManager.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManager.java:79) 
    at com.sap.ip.me.apps.jsp.Home$SyncRunnable.run(Home.java:568) 
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] D [MI/Sync ] Synchronisation: Fire SyncEvent 1 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Create MEResourceBundle(com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine, en_IN, (null)) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] D [MI/API/Services ] MEResourceBundle:Constructor: Use classloader com.sap.ip.me.core.Startup@18fe7c3 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED MEPropertyResourceBundle com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@1328c7a for bundleName: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine with Locale: _en 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] D [MI/API/Services ] CREATED parent MEPropertyResourceBundle for child bundle: com.sap.ip.me.api.services.MEResourceBundle$MEPropertyResourceBundle@1328c7a using bundle name: com/sap/ip/me/awtapps/home/mobile_engine 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] P [MI/Core ] Thread Thread-27 switched context to MI414d45455242 / MI414d45455242 (User: AMEERB, MSD: Name: / MOBILEENGINE_JSP (V. 7095), Target=, Type=com.sap.ip.me.core.FrameworkApplicationType) (stack level 1) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] I [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent Performing com.sap.ip.mi.systemnews.SyncListener on ConversationId MI414d45455242 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] P [MI/Core ] original context restored 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] P [MI/Core ] Thread Thread-27 switched context to MI2853484152454429 / MI2853484152454429 (User: (SHARED), MSD: Name: / MOBILEENGINE_JSP (V. 7095), Target=, Type=com.sap.ip.me.core.FrameworkApplicationType) (stack level 1) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] I [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent Performing com.sap.ip.me.ccms.remotetracing.RemoteTracingListener on ConversationId MI2853484152454429 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] P [MI/Core ] original context restored 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] P [MI/Core ] Thread Thread-27 switched context to MI2853484152454429 / MI2853484152454429 (User: (SHARED), MSD: Name: / MOBILEENGINE_JSP (V. 7095), Target=, Type=com.sap.ip.me.core.FrameworkApplicationType) (stack level 1) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] I [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent Performing com.sap.ip.me.ccms.LastSuccessfulSyncAlert on ConversationId MI2853484152454429 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] P [MI/Core ] original context restored 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] P [MI/Core ] Thread Thread-27 switched context to MI2853484152454429 / MI2853484152454429 (User: (SHARED), MSD: Name: / MOBILEENGINE_JSP (V. 7095), Target=, Type=com.sap.ip.me.core.FrameworkApplicationType) (stack level 1) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] I [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent Performing com.sap.ip.me.ccms.AlertManagerImpl on ConversationId MI2853484152454429 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] P [MI/Core ] original context restored 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] P [MI/Core ] Thread Thread-27 switched context to MI2853484152454429 / MI2853484152454429 (User: (SHARED), MSD: Name: / MOBILEENGINE_JSP (V. 7095), Target=, Type=com.sap.ip.me.core.FrameworkApplicationType) (stack level 1) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:697] I [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent Performing com.sap.ip.me.sync.LogSender on ConversationId MI2853484152454429 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] P [MI/Core ] original context restored 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] P [MI/Core ] Thread Thread-27 switched context to MI2853484152454429 / MI2853484152454429 (User: (SHARED), MSD: Name: / MOBILEENGINE_JSP (V. 7095), Target=, Type=com.sap.ip.me.core.FrameworkApplicationType) (stack level 1) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] I [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent Performing com.sap.ip.me.services.os.AgentManager$AgentSyncEventListener on ConversationId MI2853484152454429 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] P [MI/Core ] original context restored 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] P [MI/Core ] Thread Thread-27 switched context to MI414d45455242 / MI414d45455242 (User: AMEERB, MSD: Name: / MOBILEENGINE_JSP (V. 7095), Target=, Type=com.sap.ip.me.core.FrameworkApplicationType) (stack level 1) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] I [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent Performing com.sap.ip.me.core.StatusUpdater on ConversationId MI414d45455242 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] P [MI/Core ] original context restored 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] P [MI/Core ] Thread Thread-27 switched context to MI2853484152454429 / MI2853484152454429 (User: (SHARED), MSD: Name: / MOBILEENGINE_JSP (V. 7095), Target=, Type=com.sap.ip.me.core.FrameworkApplicationType) (stack level 1) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] I [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent Performing com.sap.ip.me.ccms.configinfo.ConfigInfoListener on ConversationId MI2853484152454429 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] P [MI/Core ] original context restored 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] P [MI/Core ] Thread Thread-27 switched context to MI2853484152454429 / MI2853484152454429 (User: (SHARED), MSD: Name: / MOBILEENGINE_JSP (V. 7095), Target=, Type=com.sap.ip.me.core.FrameworkApplicationType) (stack level 1) 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] I [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEvent Performing com.sap.ip.me.services.os.ScriptManager on ConversationId MI2853484152454429 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] P [MI/Core ] original context restored 
    [20070219 08:58:06:712] I [MI/Sync ] Synchronization finished, Thread=Thread-27 
    [20070219 08:58:16:703] D [MI/Core ] Set current application to 'MOBILEENGINE_JSP' 
    [20070219 08:58:16:703] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:doGet(...) called 
    [20070219 08:58:16:703] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:getEvent() done with event name = '' 
    [20070219 08:58:16:703] I [MI/API/Sync ] Terminate connection feature is not configured 
    [20070219 08:58:16:703] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:dispatch request to '/jsp/home/synclog.jsp' 
    [20070219 08:58:21:317] D [MI/Core ] Set current application to 'MOBILEENGINE_JSP' 
    [20070219 08:58:21:317] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:doGet(...) called 
    [20070219 08:58:21:317] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:getEvent() done with event name = '' 
    [20070219 08:58:21:317] I [MI/API/Sync ] Terminate connection feature is not configured 
    [20070219 08:58:21:317] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:dispatch request to '/jsp/home/home.jsp' 
    [20070219 08:58:22:579] D [MI/Core ] Set current application to 'MOBILEENGINE_JSP' 
    [20070219 08:58:22:579] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:doGet(...) called 
    [20070219 08:58:22:579] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:getEvent() done with event name = '' 
    [20070219 08:58:22:579] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:dispatch request to '/jsp/trace/trace.jsp' 
    [20070219 08:58:24:684] D [MI/Core ] Set current application to 'MOBILEENGINE_JSP' 
    [20070219 08:58:24:684] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:doGet(...) called 
    [20070219 08:58:24:684] D [MI/API/Runtime/JSP ] AbstractMEHttpServlet:getEvent() done with event name = '' 
    Regards,
    Ameer Baba.

  • UCCX 8 and CTI ports in UCM

    Hi! I try to configure UCCX.
    First of all, how many CTI port shoul I setup in Call Controll Group? Is it anought to setup one CTI port for all 10 agents?

    Hi
    The system works like this:
    1) Call hits a 'CTI route point', which is shown as a 'trigger' in UCCX. Think of that as a pilot number.
    2) Before UCCX can do anything, it sends the call from CTI Route Point to a CTI Port.
    3) On the CTI Port, the call is answered, and the scripts you define run. The call will stay on the CTI port until it is transferred out of the system OR to an agent, or the call ends.
    4) When the call goes to an agent, the CTI port is no longer used.
    So - typically you would have at least as many ports as agents. What the number of ports affects is the number of simultaneous calls that the system can have queueing or being prompted or held at once. How many you need depends on a lot of factors...
    - If your agents take long calls, calls may come in several at once and queue for a long time
    - If they have low staff periods (i.e. the big team lunch in the pub every day) calls will probably queue a lot
    - If you have a lot of agents, and short call and queue times, you may not have a lot of calls queueing generally
    - if you have a complex menu system or a lot of prompts before callers get to an agent, your CTI ports will be used for a  longer time, and are therefore subject to more congestion
    Generally you license the sytem per agent, and try to over provision the ports as it's difficult to predict what is needed. Consider the number of agents you have, and the number of possible inbound calls (i.e. number of inbound channels on the PSTN circuits used for the Contact Centre numbers), and the capabilities of whatever system you are replacing.
    If you have 10 agents and a single PRI, and your license lets you add 20 or 30 ports, I would do it.
    Sometimes customers get new licenses and add more agents, but they will never remember to set up more CTI ports... if they have more to start with, that's not problem.
    Regards
    Aaron
    Please rate helpful posts...

  • CTI route point and CTI ports not registering - UCCX 10.5 and CUCM 10.5 - PARTIAL SERVICE

    I'm trying to integrate CUCM 10.5 and UCCX 10.5.
    For some reason CTI route point and CTI ports are not registering on the CUCM and the status of the UCCX is "PARTIAL SERVICE".
    On the UCCX Cisco Unified CCX Engine is in status "PARTIAL SERVICE" and the Unified CM Telephony Subsystem shows status "OUT OF SERVICE".
    I tried with completely new installation of UCCX twice and got the same result twice.
    But when I tried integrating UCCX 10 with the same CUCM 10.5 from above everything works fine and all the ports are registering right away.
    In all the cases I have done the same configuration.
    The versions of CUCM is 10.5.2.10000-5.
    The version of UCCX is 10.5.1.10000-24.
    The version of UCCX 10 with which it works fine is 10.0.1.11001-37.
    Does anyone have an idea what might be the problem?

    No I haven't. Unfortunately I don't have a 32bit Excel at the moment to try.
    Can you please tell me this: I'm installing a new BE6000 system that came with this problematic version of UCCX (10.5.1.10000-24). I have been testing during the weekend with 3 versions of UCCX:
    -10.0.1.11001-37
    -10.6.1.10000-39 and
    -10.5.1.10000-24
    I got the best results with version 10.0.
    Can I install that version (10.0) in BE6000 instead of the one that came preinstalled (10.5.1)?
    This is my first BE6000 installation and I'm not sure if this is OK?
    I installed a newer version of CUCM than the one that came preinstalled because I hit bug CSCup60269 but I'm not sure If I can go to a lower version for CCX.

  • Is anyone else experiencing problems with the thunderbolt port on their Mac Mini's regarding using it to connect a second monitor? I've got the Mini Display Port to DVI-D adapter along with a DVI-D cable and I can't get an image on the second monitor.

    I had an dual display image / setup working twice for a few seconds, but then it cut out. I think there may be a problem with the thunderbolt port.

    As far as I can tell you have only listed that you have a DVI monitor connected to the Mini Displayport socket (i.e. the Thunderbolt socket) via presumably the Apple Mini Displayport to DVI adapter and a DVI to DVI cable.
    You don't appear to have listed what the second monitor is and how it is connected (even though not working). As such I cannot tell what may be wrong.

  • Has anyone not working with .dv files had synchronization problems?

    Has anyone not working with .dv files had sound synchronization problems? I'm not exactly sure what the alternatives to DV are, but I think one of them is HD.
    The reason for asking this question is to help isolate the nature and cause of a very serious flaw in iMovie '11. In the original release of iMovie '11 (version 9.0) there was a small--but serious--synchronization problem. In the 9.01 there is a large synchronization problem. We know of one person who has not experienced the problem, and he is not working with DV files (media). So we want to find out if anyone who is using something other than .dv files is experiencing a lack of synchronization between sound and picture. Knowing the answer to this will help with figuring out where the cause lies. For the initial iMovie '11 release (9.0), you probably would not notice a problem unless you had very long event-clips, e.g., two hours long. Events get this long if you are transferring from analog 8 mm tapes. Even then, it would have to be in scenes in which the connection between event and sound is obvious, e.g., close ups of people talking. It isn't until the 9.01 release that most people would notice anything. All we need to do is establish one case of a synchronization problem in which the person is using something other than DV.
    Message was edited by: Paul Bullen

    Hopefully, the 9.0.2 release will make my question moot. Zyfert must have posted the announcement of the release just as I was formulating my question. Still, if you have information on the subject, it would be interesting to hear.

  • How to avoid synchronization problem in a  JSP webpage

    HI,
    In my web page im facing a problem like if two user are workin, by that time one's page is getting reflected in other's page.
    Can anyone tell me how to avoid this synchronization problem?
    Thanx a lot

    Hi Rajesh,
    we Have Configured LDAP tree Successfully....the Problem is the Role Assignment iview under Portal Admin is not appearing....if we check the Test Connection with the  users Configured with LDAP in Authentication server TAB under user configuration,it is showing success message...but at the same time we are unable to login with the same user in to the Portal..we are working with EP 5.0....any help can be appreciated
    Regards
    Sudhir

  • UCCX8 Is there a log or report that shows IVR/CTI port availability over time

    Question:
    Is there a log or report that shows IVR/CTI port availability over time?
    Objective:
    We are trying to determine if, when doing a Call Redirect step, the IVR/CTI port stays the same or the port is made available by the first script and the second script, where the Call Redirect is redirecting to, has to reserve its own IVR/CTI port.
    What we have done already:
    We limited the Call Control Group to 1 CTI port and ran the scripts that do the Call Redirect step and it worked fine, so we are assuming that there is not a point where the transfer takes up two IVR/CTI ports at the same time.
    -Lauren

    Hi,
    if it's UCCE, then if I remember that correctly, there is a webview report that would tell you Network Trunk Group utilization. Or, actually, you can extract this information yourself from the HDS table named Trunk_Group_Half_Hour.
    G.

  • Can't import CTI Ports in CUE 3.1

    Hi Everyone,
    I have recently migrated CallManager 4.1 to CUCM 7.1. Everything is working fine but CUE is not able to integrate with CUCM 7.1
    I have provided the new credentials for Admin User and JTAPI user in CUE 3.1 and also made a new application user in CUCM 7.1.
    When I verify CallManager Admin User in CUE web interface it shows Admin login successful, JTAPI login successful.
    But when I try to search and import CTI Ports from CallManager, it shows me the error IOException: No such attribute.
    Can anyone please help me with this issue?
    Thanks,
    Amit.   

    Hi
    See this compatibility chart:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/compatibility/cuecomp.htm#CUCM
    To run CM7.1, you need to be running 3.2.1 of CUE as a minimum.
    Regards
    Aaron
    Please rate helpful posts...

  • Call Rejected error when Using CTI Port to call out

    Hello,
    I am using Cisco Call Recording feature that is enabled on a phone that has a CTI Port and number assigned to invoke a call recording session to dial out a Long Distance number. I used JTAPI tool to invoke a call and then used the CTI that was invoked by the BIB to dial a long distance number. The call leaves the phone and gets to the gateway (MGCP) with 2 T1 Pri's and in the debug I see this error:
    KNOW Good call:
    001679: *Sep 20 14:39:53.005: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x5069
            Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
                    Standard = CCITT
                    Transfer Capability = Speech
                    Transfer Mode = Circuit
                    Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
            Channel ID i = 0xA18395
                    Preferred, Channel 21
            Facility i = 0x9F8B0100A1080201010201008400
                    Protocol Profile =  Networking Extensions
                    0xA1080201010201008400
                    Component = Invoke component
                            Invoke Id = 1
                            Operation = CallingName
                                    Name not available
            Calling Party Number i = 0x0080, 'XXXXXXXXX'
                    Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
            Called Party Number i = 0x80, 'XXXXXXXXXX'
                    Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
    001680: *Sep 20 14:39:53.009: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8  callref = 0xD069
            Cause i = 0x8081 - Unallocated/unassigned number
    001681: *Sep 20 14:39:53.097: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x506A
    FAILED Call:
    001685: *Sep 20 14:39:56.509: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x1DA8
            Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
                    Standard = CCITT
                    Transfer Capability = Speech
                    Transfer Mode = Circuit
                    Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
            Channel ID i = 0xA98384
                    Exclusive, Channel 4
            Calling Party Number i = 0x0183, '2678'
                    Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown
            Called Party Number i = 0x80, 'XXXXXXXXXXX'
                    Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
    001686: *Sep 20 14:39:56.537: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x9DA8
            Channel ID i = 0xA98384
                    Exclusive, Channel 4
    001687: *Sep 20 14:39:56.557: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- DISCONNECT pd = 8  callref = 0x9DA8
            Cause i = 0x8295 - Call rejected
    001688: *Sep 20 14:39:56.585: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> RELEASE pd = 8  callref = 0x1DA8
    001689: *Sep 20 14:39:56.593: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8  callref = 0x9DA8
    001690: *Sep 20 14:40:07.001: ISDN Se0/0/1:23 Q931: RX <- SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x4200
    Anyhelp appreciated.

    Hi,
    I have looked into the issue. If you are trying to create the BP with general role 000000, i think it might not be possible via LSMW.
    The error message is correct, because role 000000 is indeed not relevant for update because if you can see in the customising Tx BUSD, 'FLAG - Do not update' will be active. This is the reason why you are getting the error message of 'No update is defined for the role 000000'.
    When you insert a partner in role "000000 General Business Partner",the error message "BP role cannot be updated" will be returned. This error message is very specific for this issue. You can create BP in different roles apart from the general role.
    Indeed if you try to change the 'Do not update' flag to inactive state and process the LSMW project you will be able to create the BP but it is strictly not recommended.
    This role is a technical role which exists for the creation of BP, and immediately you will fall back to other roles available for the partner.
    So i feel you need to change the role before you create BP with this role via LSMW.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Venkat

  • Problems with the USB Ports

    Hi there,
    I writing this because I'm having some really big problems with my USB ports.
    A few days ago I plugged in an USB-Hub that was quite cheap. Suddenly a window popped up saying that a USB device was deactivated because it "needed" to much power. Since this happening, two of those windows keep popping up everytime I boot the MacBook. I called Apple and got some help: I had to delete some .plist files and clear some caches. The man who helped was able to find the error and deactivate the notification, he also told me to make a PRAM- and a SMC-reset. The man said that it's just a software problem and that I have to reinstall the system if we don't find a solution. So, one day later I reinstalled the system (Lion) and not only didn't it help, the two notification windows were popping up again...everytime I booted the Mac. So I decided to formate the whole hard drive and install Snow Leopard -> still the problem with the USB ports. After that I installed Lion  -> still the problem with the USB ports. I even tried to extract the .kext files that are important for the USB functionality from an earlier Combo Update, but it didn't help either. The point is, that the Mac doesn't recognize my external hard drive or any of my iDevices. Sometimes it recognizes USB sticks, but only after 20 seconds. The data transfer on both USB ports is also very slow. If I'm lucky and Mac recognizes one of my USB sticks, it takes like an hour for 1GB to be transfered on the USB stick or from the USB sticks to the Mac.
    I really don't know what to do and need help, especially because my backup data is on my external hard drive which I can't access because of this problem.
    I really hope that someone can help me, I'm very thankful for every answer that could help me!
    PS: Sorry for my bad English, I hope that everyone understands what I mean, please tell me if you don't get what I'm trying to explain in the text above.
    Sincerely,
    iLoud
    [UPDATE] I downloaded "USB Prober" and copied the Output file, maybe it helps:
    Timestamp Lvl            Message
        0.698 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::DecrementOutstandingIO(7316), outstandingIO(0), _interruptReadPending(false) - rearming read
        0.698 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMCreateInterruptTransfer - root hub interrupt transfer - clearing unneeded memDesc (0x5073080) from dmaCommand (0x506a100)
        0.735 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMAbortEndpoint - endpoint 1:1,1
        0.735 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::RHAbortEndpoint - Interrupt pipe -  noting status change
        0.735 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::InterruptReadHandler error kIOReturnAborted (expected)
        0.739 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - Host controller resume detected - calling EnsureUsability
        0.739 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - deferring further processing until we are running again
        0.761 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::DecrementOutstandingIO(7320), outstandingIO(0), _interruptReadPending(false) - rearming read
        0.761 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMCreateInterruptTransfer - root hub interrupt transfer - clearing unneeded memDesc (0x5073080) from dmaCommand (0x506a100)
        0.798 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMAbortEndpoint - endpoint 1:1,1
        0.798 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::RHAbortEndpoint - Interrupt pipe -  noting status change
        0.798 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::InterruptReadHandler error kIOReturnAborted (expected)
        0.801 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - Host controller resume detected - calling EnsureUsability
        0.801 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - deferring further processing until we are running again
        0.823 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::DecrementOutstandingIO(7324), outstandingIO(0), _interruptReadPending(false) - rearming read
        0.823 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMCreateInterruptTransfer - root hub interrupt transfer - clearing unneeded memDesc (0x5073080) from dmaCommand (0x506a100)
        0.860 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMAbortEndpoint - endpoint 1:1,1
        0.860 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::RHAbortEndpoint - Interrupt pipe -  noting status change
        0.860 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::InterruptReadHandler error kIOReturnAborted (expected)
        0.863 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - Host controller resume detected - calling EnsureUsability
        0.863 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - deferring further processing until we are running again
        0.885 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::DecrementOutstandingIO(7328), outstandingIO(0), _interruptReadPending(false) - rearming read
        0.885 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMCreateInterruptTransfer - root hub interrupt transfer - clearing unneeded memDesc (0x5073080) from dmaCommand (0x506a100)
        0.922 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMAbortEndpoint - endpoint 1:1,1
        0.922 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::RHAbortEndpoint - Interrupt pipe -  noting status change
        0.922 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::InterruptReadHandler error kIOReturnAborted (expected)
        0.926 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - Host controller resume detected - calling EnsureUsability
        0.926 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - deferring further processing until we are running again
        0.947 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::DecrementOutstandingIO(7332), outstandingIO(0), _interruptReadPending(false) - rearming read
        0.947 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMCreateInterruptTransfer - root hub interrupt transfer - clearing unneeded memDesc (0x5073080) from dmaCommand (0x506a100)
        0.984 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMAbortEndpoint - endpoint 1:1,1
        0.984 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::RHAbortEndpoint - Interrupt pipe -  noting status change
        0.984 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::InterruptReadHandler error kIOReturnAborted (expected)
        0.987 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - Host controller resume detected - calling EnsureUsability
        0.987 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - deferring further processing until we are running again
        1.009 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::DecrementOutstandingIO(7336), outstandingIO(0), _interruptReadPending(false) - rearming read
        1.009 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMCreateInterruptTransfer - root hub interrupt transfer - clearing unneeded memDesc (0x5073080) from dmaCommand (0x506a100)
        1.045 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::UIMAbortEndpoint - endpoint 1:1,1
        1.045 [3]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::RHAbortEndpoint - Interrupt pipe -  noting status change
        1.045 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::InterruptReadHandler error kIOReturnAborted (expected)
        1.049 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - Host controller resume detected - calling EnsureUsability
        1.049 [2]          AppleUSBUHCI[0x4f97000]::HandleInterrupt - deferring further processing until we are running again
        1.071 [3]          AppleUSBHub[0x5076c00]::DecrementOutstandingIO(7340), outstandingIO(0), _interruptReadPending(false) - rearming read

    Oh, sorry, I meant "I'm writing this...".

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to process one message at a time on a distributed queue

    I have a situation where I need to execute/process a task of a type           asynchronously and this should be done one at a time. To do that I am thinking of setting           up a distributed queue (for load balancing and failover). Now I have    

  • Creating a Save As dialog box with Applescript for Excel 2008

    This is going to be part of a larger script. I'm trying to figure out how to make the default save location to where the file opened from and the default file name to the current filename in the dialog box. Here is what I go so far... tell applicatio

  • XP_DELETE_FILE NOT WORKING IN SQL SERVER 2005 SP2

    Hi All, I have one job in sql 2005 sp2 that deletes backup older than one week.It is not working.I have checked service account permissions on backup folder and all required permissions and authentications are in place.Please let me know how to troub

  • 8600 plus with mac osX, need to delete email addresses from scanner

    Have Mac osX snow leopard, need to remove/delete email addresses from my scanner list. Have tried to follow other posts to solve but they don't seem to help as I can't find the specific network folder. Thanks, Chuck

  • Data transfer schedule run error-object variable/with block variable no set

    I want to automate a Data Transfer Workbench routine. I created the appropriate xml file but when I run the .bat file I get the following error: "Object variable or with variable not set." I think that the problem resides in the xml file but there is