Syndication timeout - is version mismatch the reason?

Hi,
I'm getting an error
when i access the URL,
http://<server name>:<port>/webdynpro/dispatcher/sap.com/tcmdmenrichment~ui/UI
com.sap.tc.webdynpro.services.sal.deployment.api.WDDeploymentException: Failed to get deployable object part for application 'UI' of deployable object 'sap.com/tc~mdm~enrichment~ui'.
Moreover, when I check the status of the adapter in the Monitoring Systems:
i get a red flag under <i>Monitoring->MDM Enrichment Controller->Controller->Adapters->Adapter Bean Name->Services->Port Name</i> (that I've entered in MDM_EnrichmentControllerConfig.xml)
In the right frame there is an error message stating Availability Value->No
I don't understand the reason for this error, it would be very helpful if someone can clarify! I'm on SP05 Patch 2
Thanks in advance
Swarna Deepika
Message was edited by:
SwarnaDeepika

hi,
the workflow error is solved, when i directly uploaded the repositories instead of unarchiving them!! Now, there is a new problem, with
syndicating....i'm getting a timeout exception
Error occurred on-18 Sep 2007 16:28:05 Syndicate Exception - Timeout com.sap.mdm.framework.service.mdss.SyndicateServiceException: Timeout at
com.sap.mdm.framework.service.mdss.MDSS_SVC_Mng.runSyndicateService(MDSS_SVC_Mng.java:89) at
com.sap.mdm.enrichment.controller.ControllerManager.runMDSS(ControllerManager.java:847) at
com.sap.mdm.enrichment.controller.ControllerManager.manageService(ControllerManager.java:772) at
com.sap.mdm.enrichment.controller.ControllerManager.go(ControllerManager.java:541) at
com.sap.mdm.enrichment.controller.ControllerManager.runEnrichmentService(ControllerManager.java:109) at
com.sap.mdm.enrichment.workflowpolling.ControllerThread.run(ControllerThread.java:73)
1. my syndication server is running.
2. repositories' user name and password has been entered in mdss.ini
3. outbound port is empty.
I suspect whether version mismatch might be a problem, because my Server is on SP05 Patch 2 HotFix 1(5.5.42.57) while the
syndication and import servers are on SP05 Patch 2(5.5.42.48). Can you confirm if this might be the reason for timeout?
Regards
Swarna

Similar Messages

Version mismatch error in SOAP interface

Hi
Scenario is SOAP to SOAP.
Sending request by SOAP UI to receiver webservice.
Interface was perfectly done & tested successfully.
Then we have done some changes in Receiver soap channel ...due to some error the changes were reverted
but now i am getting an error while testing as " version mismatch"
The provider webservice is working fine as we have tested it without PI.
The complete discription of error is as follows
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
   <soapenv:Body>
      <soapenv:Fault>
         <faultcode>soapenv:Server.generalException</faultcode>
         <faultstring>senderChannel '54cfea9d7e9b3ad2895bbe47a9aaa877': Catching exception calling messaging system; nested exception is:
     com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Version Mismatch</faultstring>
         <detail>
            <ns1:hostname xmlns:ns1="http://xml.apache.org/axis/">usa42113</ns1:hostname>
         </detail>
      </soapenv:Fault>
   </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
Please suggest the reason for this error & the possible solution
Regards
Abhijit

Hi prateek
yes, we are using Axis Framework.
Earlier the interface was working fine with same configuration...But now its giving error as " Version mismatch"
Regards
Abhijit

AIR 16 Public SDK gets rejected by Apple [Minimum OS Version Mismatch]

Just tried doing a submission. It immediately gets rejected for Invalid Binary.
Invalid Binary Error
Minimum OS Version Mismatch - The minimum OS version (LC_VERSION_MIN_IPHONEOS) in the binary ('6.0') for architecture ('armv7') differs from the MinimumOSVersion ('7.0') in the Info.plist.

We are also seeing this issue. Even compiling a basic project with just the necessary items and no ANE's results in the following error when uploaded to the app store:
Minimum OS Version Mismatch - The minimum OS version (LC_VERSION_MIN_IPHONEOS) in the binary ('5.0') for architecture ('armv7') differs from the MinimumOSVersion ('8.0') in the Info.plist.
Minimum OS Version Mismatch - The minimum OS version (LC_VERSION_MIN_IPHONEOS) in the binary ('7.0') for architecture ('arm64') differs from the MinimumOSVersion ('8.0') in the Info.plist.
Reverting to Air SDK 15 bypasses the issue for now.

2012 R2 - One server not applying two updates. Lists AD / SYSVOL Version Mismatch

So we have a bunch of servers running 2012 R2. On 1 or 2 of them I have a certain GPO that isn't applying. The specific one I'm having trouble with is our SNMP settings. The base settings applied but then we updated the GPO to add in an
additional IP address. Most servers pulled it down fine but 1 or 2 did not. Tried gpupdate /force and normal things and just can't get it to apply.
I can the gpresult /h and in the html file it says:
The following GPOs have special alerts
Default Domain Policy - AD / SYSVOL Version Mismatch
SNMP - AD / SYSVOL Version Mismatch
The only info I found on that error talks about a particular patch but we already have that patch installed. The change was put in over a week ago and is still not flowing to just these specific machines.
Anyone have any idea how I can figure out what the problem is? They are production machines so I can't reboot them until Saturday night when we are scheduled to do the Feb Patches anyway. I don't know if that will help or not so if there's something
else I can check in the meantime, that'd be great.
Thanks!

Quick note on this issue:
I was running RSOP against a user and server other than the local server, and the error would not go away, I tried installing the patches and rollups on the DC I was seeing the error on. Since these were already installed I tried installing
them from the stand alone download.
They complained about already being installed, so I was relegated to doing more research.
After some time, and while chasing a separate issue on the other server, I noticed that the updates on THAT SERVER were not up to date. I ran into issues updating due to corruption (another story altogether), but with the help of Microsoft Support,
I was able to get THAT SERVER updated.
I went back to troubleshooting the AD / Sysvol error, starting from scratch...trying to install the patches that were already installed...etc.
Just for grins and giggles, I re-ran the RSOP against the original user and the other server and viola, the error is gone.
Longer story than it needed to be, I know, but this leads me to believe that the error is NOT on the DC to DC but an issue with the server your running RSOP against. I am not positive that this is actually the case, but this may help someone out.
So if anyone can test and/or verify this please post.
Supreme executive power is derived from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. -- Dennis the peasant Les Waggoner WCC Internet Technologies

FEX state : AA version Mismatch

Hi,
Im quite puzzle with this problem. I have N5k connected with N2k FEX 100 using port eth1/32 :
sh run int eth1/32
version 5.0(3)N2(1)
interface Ethernet1/32
switchport mode fex-fabric
fex associate 100
channel-group 32
# sh int eth1/32
Ethernet1/32 is up
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
# sh fex 100
FEX: 100 Description: FEX0100   state: AA Version Mismatch
FEX version: 5.2(1)N1(1a) [Switch version: 5.0(3)N2(1)]
pinning-mode: static    Max-links: 1
Fabric port for control traffic: Eth1/32
Fabric interface state:
    Po32 - Interface Up. State: Active
    Eth1/32 - Interface Up. State: Active
What can I saw here is FEX and Switch is different version. So what is potential problem. Right now I facing link N5k to FEX keep repeatly lost between 10 minutes. Is that related with this mismatch version. I also detected below log :
%ETHPORT-3-IF_NON_CISCO_TRANSCEIVER: Non-Cisco transceiver on interface Ethernet1/32 is detected
Thanks and appreciate your comments

Hi,
The FEX operates as what you could consider as a remote line card of the Nexus 5000 switch, and when booted downloads software from the upstream switch. As you've stated, what you're seeing here is that the switch is running one version of NX-OS and the FEX a different version. When you have a version mismatch the FEX should download the software version of the parent switch.
What model of FEX are you trying to connect? My guess is that it's a hardware type not supported by your current NX-OS version on the Nexus 5000 such as the N2K-C2248TP-E-1GE which was supported from 5.1(3)N1(1), or more likely the N2K-C2232TM-E-10GE which was supported from 5.2(1)N1(1a).
If you're trying to connect one of the aforementioned FEX models then you have no choice but to upgrade the NX-OS on the Nexus 5000.
Regards

Upgraded to 8.2.1 now I have a version mismatch for the PDA module ver. 8.2

I just recieved a new laptop. I installed LV 8.2.1, then PDA module 8.2. Programs will not build. I get a "Mismatched Versions of Labview and the PDA module" error. Help.

Hello,
I was able to reproduce this version mismatch error on a test PC with LabVIEW 8.2.1 and PDA 8.2. This is expected behavior. Also, Matt called in on the phone, and I directed him to his internal sales representative to be shipped 8.2.1 of the PDA module.
I suspect the reason why I was not encountering this on my own PC was that I had already upgraded my LabVIEW Touch Panel Module to 8.2.1 but not PDA yet.
For all people reading this, the ultimate answer is that the PDA version number should match the LabVIEW version number.
Best regards,
-Sam F, DAQ Marketing Manager
Learn about measuring temperature
Learn how to take voltage measurements
Learn how to measure current

I have lightroom 5 and after I just tried to upload my wacom tablet 3 on laptop and, it's not compatable. The only thing a window box keeps apearing when I open lightroom it say tablet version mismatched.

I have lightroom 5 and after I just tried to upload my wacom tablet 3 on laptop and, it's not compatable. I've tried to remove the Wacom program. Awindow box keeps apearing when I open lightroom it say tablet version mismatched and it completely closes my lightroom on me. What do I do??? I need my lightroom

Hi,
/Users/sarahschadek/Desktop/Safari.app/Contents/MacOS/Safari
Move the Safari app from the Desktop to the Applications folder.
Restart your Mac.
That's why you see this:
When I try to do the updates my computer says it has ready it goes through like it is downloading them then at the end it says some of the files could not be saved to "/" files.
After your restart your Mac, click the Apple  menu (top left in your screen) then click: Software Update ...
Carolyn

Unable to load the OCFS due to kernel version mismatch

Hi,
I am using RedHat Linux ES 3.0 and installed the OCFS successfully but, unable to load the ocfs due to OCFS version conflict with the kernel version. following message displyed when i try to load ocfs.
OCFS was built for Kernel version --> 2.4.21-4.EL
KERNEL Version --> 2.4.21-9.ELorafw3.
================== message as follows ================
load_ocfs
/sbin/insmod ocfs node_name=linuz2 ip_address=1.1.1.2
cs=1803 guid=626147BF390EFFB6609900061BC97853
comm_voting=1 ip_port=7000
Using /lib/modules/2.4.21-EL-ABI/ocfs/ocfs.o
/lib/modules/2.4.21-EL-ABI/ocfs/ocfs.o: kernel-module
version mismatch
/lib/modules/2.4.21-EL-ABI/ocfs/ocfs.o was
compiled for kernel version 2.4.21-4.EL
while this kernel is version
2.4.21-9.ELorafw3.
load_ocfs: insmod failed
================== message ends here ==================
thanks & regards,
Jagadeswar V
Singapore

I have seen that error before, try using a different ip address for your machine, I'm not sure that the one you're using ( 1.1.1.2 ) is valid. Try ip an ip address using one of the following blocks:
10.x.x.x
192.168.x.x
load_ocfs will throw that error if it just doesn't like your configuration sometimes, or if you havn't generated an ocfs.conf.
Can you ping your other node ( 1.1.1.1 I assume )?

HT1476 Since I have updated to the new version, iOS 7, I have noticed the battery does last long as it was in iOs 6. Some friends have the same problem May I know the reason?

Since I have updated to the new version, iOS 7, I have noticed the battery does last long as it was in iOs 6. I have already updateed to 7.0.2 the latest version. Some friends have the same problem May I know the reason?

You need to update iTunes to 11.1 on your PC

After I chose a color with the eye dropper tool, the filler fills in a grayer version of the color, for some reason.

I have CS3 and after I chose a color with the eye dropper tool, the filler fills in a grayer version of the color for some reason. Everything was fine till I accidentally picked the color sampler tool instead of the eye dropper tool. I undid that, but then after that everything with the regular eye dropper tool and the fill tool got messed up. How can I fix it?

Sorry, I am new to the forum, and a novice with not much knowledge about computers. Sorry if some terms that I use here may not be entirely correct, as I am ignorant of terms of the trade. My Operating system is Mac 10.6.8. I am using Photoshop 10.0.1. I am doing a many layered color RGB setting artwork from scanned and photo images, 8 bits/channel. I have been working on this project for a month without any problems. I was using the eye dropper tool. I selected a color in my artwork and it showed up in the background color box, in the tools window, as a match from the sample that I had taken. Then I selected an area, with the lasso tool, and I accidentally picked the tool called "color sample tool", that puts a little target on the sample area and then a box pops up with numbers that move when the tool moves. That wasn't what I wanted, so I got out of there and chose the eye dropper, I selected the color, it looked good in the box in the tools window, but then when I went up to the fill command and chose fill ( which was set at 100%). I filled the selection, but it was not the color I chose that is in box, it was a grayed and lightened version of the one that I chose. I checked the layers setting and the opacity and fill were at 100%, as was the fill setting. I can't figure out what is making it not fill in the color that is chosen in the tools color window. Does anyone on this forum have an idea of what might be happening and how to fix it?

I can not download the latest version of the shockplayer for some reason.

i have tried several times to download the latest version of the shockplayer and for some reason it will nit download. how could i resolve this issue?

The current version of the full installer for windows is always at this link

2 Problems while Distributing app Version Mismatch. Neither CFBundleversion ['1.1'] nor CFBundleShortVersionString ['1.1'] in the info.plist match the version of the app set in iTunes Connect ['1.1']

Since 2 days when I try to validate or distribute my app it says "Version Mismatch. Neither CFBundleversion ['1.1'] nor CFBundleShortVersionString ['1.1'] in the info.plist match the version of the app set in iTunes Connect ['1.1']". Today it also always says that the Network Connection was lost. Can someone tell me how to solve this problems?
Thanks

Thank you Bob
Ian
Ian Bennett
Lecturer
Department of Communication, Film and Media,
Anglia Ruskin University,
East Road,
Cambridge
CB1 1PT
[email protected]

Dispatcher not starting up ::Shared library version mismatch

Hi,
System is SAP ECC 6.0, AIX and Oracle 10g.
We upgraded the Kernel Level from 201 to Level 221.
<hostname>/root$ su - <sid>adm
[YOU HAVE NEW MAIL]
.profile[30]: 1: not found.
<hostname>:sidadm> disp+work
disp+work information
kernel release                700
kernel make variant           700_REL
compiled on                   AIX 2 5 005DD9CD4C00
compiled for                  64 BIT
compilation mode              UNICODE
compile time                  Aug 23 2009 20:51:38
update level                  0
patch number                  221
source id                     0.221
supported environment
database (SAP, table SVERS)   700
operating system
AIX 1 5
AIX 2 5
AIX 3 5
After upgrading the kernel dispatcher is not starting. Kindly find the below error:
sysno      10
sid        SID
systemid   324 (IBM RS/6000 with AIX)
relno      7000
patchlevel 0
patchno    221
intno      20050900
make:      single threaded, Unicode, 64 bit, optimized
pid        778402
Wed Nov 25 12:20:08 2009
kernel runs with dp version 243000(ext=110000) (@(#) DPLIB-INT-VERSION-243000-UC)
length of sys_adm_ext is 576 bytes
SWITCH TRC-HIDE on ***
***LOG Q00=> DpSapEnvInit, DPStart (10 778402) [dpxxdisp.c   1287]
DwSLCheckVersion: shared library version mismatch:
        shared lib "dw_xml.so" version 201 <-> kernel version 221
        shared lib "dw_xtc.so" version 201 <-> kernel version 221
        shared lib "dw_stl.so" version 201 <-> kernel version 221
        shared lib "dw_gui.so" version 201 <-> kernel version 221
        shared lib "dw_mdm.so" version 201 <-> kernel version 221
DP_FATAL_ERROR => Version mismatch of dw shared libraries detected. See dev_disp trace for details.
Set environment variable SAP_NO_SLIB_CHECK=1 to disable version checking.
DISPATCHER EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN ***
NiWait: sleep (5000ms) ...
NiISelect: timeout 5000ms
NiISelect: maximum fd=1
NiISelect: read-mask is NULL
NiISelect: write-mask is NULL
Wed Nov 25 12:20:13 2009
NiISelect: TIMEOUT occured (5000ms)
ERROR => DpHalt: my PID is not the dispatcher's (778402/0) [dpxxdisp.c   10510]
Kindly look into the issue. Looking forward for your reply.
Thanks,
Soumya

Soumya Saha wrote:
ERROR => DpHalt: my PID is not the dispatcher's (778402/0) http://dpxxdisp.c 10510
The system appears to think that the dispatcher process may already be running. Stop all the SAP processes and run cleanipc to clear out the shared memory. I've seen this on AIX before where the shared memory will prevent SAP from starting back up and clearing these resolved the issue.
Hope that is helpful.
J. Haynes

EP Version Mismatch

I've been noticing an odd occurrence on my system lately. I have an ADR setup to deploy Forefront Updates, set to install outside of MW and not prompt the user for anything. All has been well. For whatever reason, we now have a version mismatch between the
clients and SCCM. The ADR still seems to be pushing updates, even though they don't install, but is also notifying users of updates constantly.
I checked my endpoint log, and see this:
EP 4.2.223.1 is installed, version is higher than expected installer version 4.1.522.0. EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 7:23:00 AM 7816 (0x1E88)
Check and enforce EP Deployment state. EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 7:23:00 AM 7816 (0x1E88)
EP Client is already installed, will NOT trigger reinstallation. EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 7:23:00 AM 7816 (0x1E88)
Sending message to external event agent to test and enable notification EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 7:23:00 AM 7816 (0x1E88)
Sending message to endpoint ExternalEventAgent EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 7:23:00 AM 7816 (0x1E88)
EP Policy Antimalware Policy is already applied. EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 7:23:00 AM 7816 (0x1E88)
Firewall provider is installed. EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 7:23:00 AM 7816 (0x1E88)
Installed firewall provider meet the requirements. EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 7:23:00 AM 7816 (0x1E88)
start to send State Message with topic type = 2001, state id = 3, and error code = 0x00000000 EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 7:23:00 AM 7816 (0x1E88)
Skip sending state message due to same state message already exists. EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 7:23:00 AM 7816 (0x1E88)
Endpoint is triggered by message. EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 10:39:00 AM 6356 (0x18D4)
File C:\Windows\ccmsetup\SCEPInstall.exe version is 4.1.522.0. EndpointProtectionAgent 6/27/2013 10:39:00 AM 6356 (0x18D4)
If I install the EP client off of my distribution point, the version is correct. One of the windows updates pushed out by SCCM is a newer version of the EP client, as I see it in the installed updates. Since it pushed this new version out, I get constant
mismatches.
How should I go about correcting this? I haven't had much luck finding others with the issue yet.

It does. For whatever reason, my ADR isn't pushing updates correctly anymore. I get constant (and I do mean constant) pop-up notifications stating that an update is available. It's always an EP definition update. There's an endless number of updates. Some
have the same KB number and install multiple times. My updates should automatically install without any user notification according to the ADR.
I had assumed the version mismatch in the log was telling me the definitions were not installing b/c of a version mismatch.

Version Mismatch for Kernel and CPU after 10.6.4 update

I had a kernel panic in both Mac Pro and MacBook Pro after a usually no-brainer software update OS X 10.6.4....I tried all of the shortcuts (zapping PRAM, booting from other drives, safemode, etc) and I get the dreaded gray screen and restart message immediately,,,what can I do short of purchasing a new board for each machine?
I did disk verification and repairs via target disk mode from a third laptop, but the pro macs never get past the grey screen in order to give me the chance to update! The screen text says:
"panic(cpu 0 caller 0x2x096e6) Version mismatch between Kernel and CPU PM"@/Source Cache/...
Debugger called: <panic>"
What can I do to GET PAST the "version mismatch" and "ned to restart" screen to be ABLE to update?

Just tried installing the 10.6.4 update on my iMac i5. It began the usual shutdown, and I was expecting the install to begin. That never happened. 10 minutes went by at least. I forced it to shut down, and now it won't boot. Same as the OP - "Version mis-match between Kernel and CPU PM"
There is no option to boot from anything else, either. The machine won't boot from an original install CD, or from an install image I keep on USB. I tried zapping PRAM, and resetting SMC. At this point, I consider it bricked. Fortunately, I have a reasonably recent TM backup.
Won't have time to take it in until Monday. Sure hope someone has some insight before then.

Syndication timeout - is version mismatch the reason?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for